01-02 George Zimmerman Case – Open Discussion Thread

Use this thread as an open thread just for Zimmerman Case stuff. A place to just dump, collect, or discuss general information about the Trayvon Martin VS George Zimmerman Case.

REMINDER – Please WATCH THE TONE and CONTENT of Commentary. Please be respectful, courteous and considerate of other readers and contributors. Please avoid hatespeak, angry rhetoric, vulgarity, personal attacks and condescension. If you wish to engage in vitriolic, racist, or bitter angry rhetoric, there are alternative sites on the internet more than welcoming to such considerations. But not here. Thank You.

About these ads
This entry was posted in George Zimmerman Open Thread, Trayvon Martin, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

189 Responses to 01-02 George Zimmerman Case – Open Discussion Thread

    • justfactsplz says:

      They were able to access the phone found at the scene with the heart sticker on it. You just have not seen any discovery about that. The state is not about to release information on a phone that would destroy the DeeDee narrative.

      Like

    • hooson1st says:

      you continue to amaze

      Like

    • recoverydotgod says:

      I would think the defense would want to know what’s on that phone before they depose Ben Crump.

      Like

      • crossdraw says:

        i would think the defense would at least want the voice mail of TM cell phone that way they would have a sample of his voice because didn’t TM mommy say thats the only way she could hear TM anymore

        Like

    • tara says:

      Wow, that is really interesting. First they state that they couldn’t get the info off of the phone because the battery was low and/or the phone was wet. Later on they claim they couldn’t get the info because they didn’t have the password:

      On March 1, 2012 I was contact by the supervisor from the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office that they could not do anything with the cell phone other than download what was on the memory chip because they did not have the password

      On March 1, 2012, I was contacted by the supervisor of the Seminole County Sheriff’s Office that unless they had the swipe code they could not access the victims cell phone

      Who had the Cellebrite device?

      Like

  1. arkansasmimi says:

    Mods you have mail ;)

    Like

  2. diwataman says:

    And yes, I’m still counting the days on O’Mara. He has until Friday to file anything he would like the court to consider at the Jan 8th hearing. I find it extremely difficult to believe there was nothing to be done in that area since the last hearing considering the history of this case and considering what remains to be done. My main consideration is the SYG hearing. This judge by her history in this case so far does not seem like she will be friendly to the defense in granting continuances so if O’Mara wants to push his luck in that with her that’s on him. I am seriously doubting he will be ready for an April SYG hearing and she aint going to be happy about that but I am of course happy to be proven wrong. I guess we’ll see in April. I’m just trying to get ahead of the game.

    Like

    • jordan2222 says:

      Isn’t there some unfinished business from the last hearing? If I recall, at least one motion, maybe more, were not filed on time according to her 48 hour rule.

      Like

    • jello333 says:

      Here’s what I figure is going on: All the complaints that MOM/West had about the prosecution have now been taken care of “behind the scenes”. The judge told Bernie that if he didn’t straighten up, she was no longer gonna protect him in open court, and would even entertain possible sanctions motions should it come to that. Same goes for Crump. And so those two FINALLY realized they had pushed it as far as they could, and have now FINALLY started to cooperate with MOM/West. That’s the only thing that makes sense to me, anyway. Oh, and we’ve talked a lot about Gutman and his copy of the first Dee Dee tape. Well, as I’ve been saying for a couple months now… I bet he has already voluntarily talked with Mark and Don, and maybe even already turned the tape over to them. Of course none of this would completely explain why nothing official has recently been posted on the GZ Case site, but…

      Like

      • justfactsplz says:

        No news is good news. The defense is getting what they need.

        Like

      • jordan2222 says:

        jello
        What do mean by this?
        The judge told Bernie that if he didn’t straighten up, she was no longer gonna protect him in open court, and would even entertain possible sanctions motions should it come to that. Same goes for Crump.

        Like

        • jello333 says:

          It’s just my opinion. But I have a feeling that Nelson is not nearly as out-of-touch and naive as she sometimes appears. When she says, “He [Bernie or Crump] is an officer of the court, and I’m sure he can be trusted to do the right thing,” I do NOT think she really believes that. But she puts on a show in court. I think she may have finally told those two (and maybe others) in no uncertain terms that she was done playing games. If they didn’t start cooperating with the defense team, she was gonna stop playing nice. Again… just my opinion.

          Like

          • jordan2222 says:

            Thanks for clearing that up because I do not recall Nelson actually scolding Bernie .. or Crump. She did however, seem to chide West.

            Like

            • jello333 says:

              A couple of lawyer types ( ;) ) here have mentioned this a few times, and it’s been my experience too: When you see a judge seemingly coming down hard on one side far more than on the other side, it’s usually bad news for the side who’s being treated “nicely”. That would be the case where a judge already pretty much knows which direction the case is headed, and so doesn’t want anyone to claim she was biased when she eventually makes her final ruling. In other words, if your side has been hammered throughout the case, but in the end the judge sides with you, chances are you’re not gonna mind all the hammering that went on earlier. Now on the other hand, if you get hammered and also LOSE… well then, you might be screaming BIAS! from the rafters.

              Like

          • libby says:

            Right, she said, i played games with you in open court for months but for once they would have to do their jobs as the LAW requires (she couldnt get away with being a persecution surrogate for the entire time she presided over this case as much as she might like to).

            Like

  3. justfactsplz says:

    Since nothing has been filed for the hearing, I am assuming the defense has been very busy behind the scenes. I certainly hope this is the case.

    Like

  4. eastern2western says:

    the arizona watermelon juice is sufficient to prove there was never any struggle and george zimmerman never attacked trayvon.
    Fact: the arizona melon juice was found in perfect condition in the center of martin’s hoodie pocket.
    Lets assume all possible scenarios.
    1) according to dd, she heard people rolling around on the grass and trayvon yelling get off. wow, if she told the truth, then the arizona can would had felt out of the hoodie jacket or could had been destroied.
    2) de la rionda accused zimmerman as the aggressor and he tackled trayvon. Okay, let me assume this was a surprise attack, then this imaginary tackle must be either coming from the side or the back. If de la rionda’s theory were true, then the arizona can would had either felt out of the hoodie pocket or smashed by the force of travyon falling to the ground.
    However, the can was found in a perfect condition and it slipped out of the hoodie pocket when the officer tried to turn over martin’s body to give him cpr. The arizona can should be use as a circumstantial evidence to prove that martin was on top of zimmerman during the whole fight until the gun shot. It is ironic that the arizona can was the symbol of camp trayvon and it could possibly be use to zimmerman’s advantage/

    Like

    • howie says:

      Juries pick things like this. At least some of them do. It is surprising what a juror might focus on. To me this seems minor. But if one juror seizes on it it could turn the verdict.

      Like

    • ejarra says:

      I found that evidence that surrounds the can to be much more damaging to the state. Ergo, Why was the can removed from the 7-11 bag? The can was found under his hoodie, yet the bag was several feet away from the initial altercation.

      My theory is that he removed the can from the bag to use it as a weapon while hiding between the 2 buildings east and south of the walk and the wind blew the bag out on the grass. I believe that the can of watermelon drink was in his hand, the hand that initially struck Georgie’s face/nose. Georgie said that he thought Mr. Martin had something in his hand when he had gotten hit. Mr. Martin then put the can back, sans bag, inside his sweatshirt before he continued his pounding.

      This is all conjecture on my part; but, I do believe that this is exactly what happened.

      Like

      • crossdraw says:

        i have been reading awile on here and i figure i might as well get in the conversation, i was thinking that TM had ahold of the top of the bag with the can in the bottom and swung the bag and hit GZ with it until the bag broke and then at some point when GZ was on the ground TM picked up the can and put in his hoodie to use it later on GZ or his lean. because if you look at the bloody pic of GZ there is a half moon mark on his forhead like a bottom of a can would make

        Like

        • tara says:

          Interesting. We know Trademark left the 7-11 with the watermelon juice and Skittles in a bag. We know a 7-11 bag was found at the scene but Skittles and watermelon juice were in Trademark’s pockets. Is the bag at the scene the same bag which had formerly contained Trademark’s purchased items? Do we know if the bag was intact?

          Is this the bag? http://www.wtsp.com/images/640/360/2/assetpool/photogallery/255685/DSC_0019.jpg

          Lying in the middle of the sidewalk. Why would it be there if the contents were already in Trademark’s pockets?

          Like

          • tara says:

            Just noticed in the evidence section of the discovery docs, the white bag is noted as having blood on it. But the white bag is the WalMart bag. Spray from the shooting?

            Like

            • crossdraw says:

              i think the walmart bag was bung out to put over the hole in TM chest while doing cpr by the cops or first responders

              Like

            • tara says:

              Police document indicates that one of the first officers to arrive requested a plastic grocery bag and vaseline from bystandards so that he could seal Trademark’s chest wound. Perhaps the WalMart bag is that bag, and that’s why it had blood on it. Sorry if I’m trying to work out things that you all know. :)

              Like

          • rumpole2 says:

            At 7-11…. Drink was in bag, but skittle he put in pocket. So he wandered off with a bag containing just the can… a possible swinging weapon?

            Like

            • tara says:

              I don’t think he’d have time or motivation to take the can out of the bag and put it in his pocket after swinging it. I’m wondering if the bag was even Trademark’s bag. There were two bags in the vicinity, maybe just random garbage?

              Like

      • rumpole2 says:

        Conjecture, but worth pursuing.
        I thought similar… only that he swung the bag with can in it… can dislodged from the bag but picked up again by TM

        Like

    • tara says:

      As a juror I wouldn’t find the can theory compelling. What I find compelling are 1) GZ’s notable injuries and Trademark’s lack of injuries, 2) statement by police that GZ’s back was wet and covered with grass, 3) DD2′s statement that it was Trademark who initiated the verbal confrontation, 4) Trademark’s location within the complex (not by Brandy’s house even though DD2 stated that Trademark told her he was “right by” there), 5) eyewitness statements placing Trademark on top.

      Like

      • eastern2western says:

        the can theory should be part of the circumstantial evidence that shows martin was on top of zimmerman and beating on him till the gun shot.

        Like

      • jello333 says:

        And the screaming. Far, far, FAR more evidence to suggest it was George, not Trayvon, who was screaming. Everything else makes perfect sense once you realize who was really screaming.

        Like

  5. arkansasmimi says:

    This is the latest I have been up in a long time, reading. Whew! glad I put on my hip boots! Went by Leatherheads blog and stepped in a few other muddy blogs~ Stinch still out there I see. Leatherhead and the dog pound still at it. Funny thing is Leatherhead nuts, seems some of them are resigned to the fact that Geo is going to go free, and dont know how to come to terms with it.

    Like

  6. arkansasmimi says:

    Wooop Woooop YOU HAVE MAIL

    Like

  7. rumpole2 says:

    Daily Daft Post from Justarse Quest

    Another great example of denial

    Reactions the analysis by Fred Francis (a former NBC senior correspondent)

    “Zimmerman will be acquitted because it’s a weak case, [Fred] Francis told host Howard Kurtz.
    “I’m telling you, this is the weakest case I’ve ever seen get this kind of national publicity,” Francis said.”

    Random Topics:

    http://randomtopics.org/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=584&p=19361#p19361

    Like

    • Chip Bennett says:

      I suppose that, for anyone who can divine the sounds of 4 accomplices and a cockatoo in the 911 recordings, it is logical to believe that the voice screaming in anguished pleas for help is Martin rather than Zimmerman.

      Like

  8. lovemygirl says:

    So far, George is still innocent ;)

    Like

  9. arkansasmimi says:

    Postes on Facebook, so guess no big secret…Looks like TrayDad and Brandi had a New Years Baby Boy!!! Congrats!! Hmm he has TrayDad initials just like TM did.. Wonder if they will get the first baby gifts at their hospital? ;) gotta get all them freebies ya can…
    ********
    LowwKeyy Kira
    8 hours ago via mobile.
    At 8:58 I Became Another Big Sister My Mood Right Now Is Filled With Joy I’m Very Anxious Too See My Little Brother ‘ They Are Going To Be Very Mad At Me I Am Going To Spoil That Little Boy Aw #Team Big Sister Too Tyler Brandon Martin And too Demetrius Martin.

    Like

    • arkansasmimi says:

      Posted on Public viewed FB :)
      *****
      Jalen Martin She had the baby
      4 hours ago via mobile..
      LowwKeyy Kira Yes ‘
      4 hours ago via mobile..

      Like

    • James Crawford says:

      Do a DNA paternity test!

      I suspect that TrayDad’s sperm got their little asses kicked, again.

      Like

    • tara says:

      Isn’t Tracy Martin still married to someone? And how many kids has he fathered with how many different women? Dude needs to “put a glove on it”.

      Like

    • tara says:

      Ahhh, “Kira” is Takira, one of Tracy Martin’s kids?

      Do I have this right?:

      Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton Trayvon Martin (born 1995)
      Tracy Martin and Larissa B Rozier Takira Brenae Martin (born 1999)
      Tracy Martin and Cindy Lopez Demetrius Jamal Martin (born 2000?)
      Tracy Martin and Brandi Green Jalen Martin? (born 2013)

      Or is Brandi’s new baby Tyler Brandon Martin? If so, then who is Jalen?

      Like

      • tara says:

        In a prior message by Takira, she mentioned brother Kevin. Who is that? Is he a Martin, or is this another kid of Rozier’s by some other dude? I think we need some complex math to sort this all out.

        Like

        • ejarra says:

          Same mom, different dad. They cant’t use a family tree, they need a bush!

          Like

          • tara says:

            Yes, and we shouldn’t forget that Brandy has at least one child by a different father. Nobody in the Trademark universe was monogamous, apparently.

            Side note: It appears Chad’s father is Chester Joseph. Articles always refer to Chad as “Chad Green”, but in one court document his name is listed as “Chad Joseph”.

            Unrelated to the family spaghetti bowl, but interesting IMO … both Brandy and Chester Joseph had taken someone named Marlita Williams to court. In Brandy’s case she filed a complaint on Chad’s behalf, “repeat violence”. In Chester’s case the complaint is “dating violence”. The year was 2004, Chad would have been 6 years old or so. Poor kid growing up in that environment! I’d like to whisk him away before it’s too late!

            http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=925190

            http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=902219

            Like

            • theparagons says:

              Per your link, Brandy has a felony conviction for Aggravated Assault in 1997.

              Case No. 1997-CF-008526-A-OSTATE OF FLORIDA VS. GREEN, BRANDY LATRESA §
              §
              §
              §
              §
              §
              Case Type: Criminal Felony
              Date Filed: 07/01/1997
              Location: Circuit Criminal Divisions – Felony
              Uniform Case Number: 481997CF008526000AOX

              Party Information Lead Attorneys
              Defendant GREEN, BRANDY LATRESA
              DOB: 06/27/1978

              Plaintiff STATE OF FLORIDA

              Charge Information Charges: GREEN, BRANDY LATRESA Statute Level Date

              Like

            • MJW says:

              Joseph is the surname Chad goes by. That’s how he listed in his football league (page 4).

              Like

        • jello333 says:

          I’m putting together a spreadsheet of all the relationships of the various members of the Martin/Fulton/misc clan. I think Excel has finally met its match!

          Like

      • tara says:

        Straightened myself out with help from CTH posts:

        Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton => Trayvon Martin (born 1995)
        Tracy Martin and Larissa B Rozier =>Takira Brenae Martin (born 1999)
        Tracy Martin and Cindy Lopez => Demetrius Jamal Martin (born 2000?)
        Tracy Martin and Brandi Green => Tyler Brandon Martin (born 2013)

        Still trying to figure out who Jalen Martin is. Tracy’s brother maybe?

        Like

    • tara says:

      I just realized … if Brandy just had the baby then it was probably conceived in April. Distraught father had time to bang gf during world trash basket tour. It’s a miracle!

      Like

    • theparagons says:

      Mimi – does this mean that Traydad and Brandi had a baby?

      Totally confused.

      Like

      • yankeeintx says:

        Yes, they did. Tyler Brandon Martin. Born yesterday at 8:58.

        Like

        • jello333 says:

          You know what I find so odd about that is the timing. I mean, not shocking that Tracy and Brandy managed to have a kid… that’s not what I mean. But if she’s just now giving birth, it means she must have gotten pregnant somewhere around late March, early April. I had kinda assumed that their “relationship” had ended right after the shooting. But if these dates are right, it means that Brandy and Tracy were still sleeping together even as the Trashcan Tour — starring Sybrina, Tracy, and Jaharvis — was going on.

          Hmmm…

          Like

          • ejarra says:

            She was told that she could be seen in public with Sybrina and Tracy. That’s why she was told to wait in the car and keep Alvira company while the two of them went around with their trash cans.

            Like

            • kathyca says:

              yep, and when she posted her pg on fb she was told to take it down. So she “liked” target baby instead. And, well, you can never keep the teenagers in check. Hence, the sister’s baby announcement. Welcome to Amoral Amerika — acronyms optional

              Like

      • diwataman says:

        “…This My Brother Not My nephew And This My Daddy Son” -Takira

        Good grief, it’s like The Days of Our Lives up in here, lol. Yes, it is Tracy and Brandy’s. Why is that confusing? They have been in a relationship for years now.

        Like

  10. arkansasmimi says:

    Ummmm this makes me Laugh hard! This same bunch of wacko’s constantly flap their lips about Geo asking for donations for his legal causes, and low and behold the TRASH CAN TOUR CONTINUES AT FULL SPEED! I would say Pot calling kettle black, but that would be RACIST wouldnt it?! Oh and wont they have to pay taxes on all that $ that they had donated that stated firmly not a tax deductable donation?
    *********
    Benjamin Crump, Esq.‏@attorneycrump Dec 28 2012
    @Change4Trayvon has big plans for the new year! Plz don’t forget 2 make your contribution today! @natjackesq @sybrinafulton @BTrayMartin9
    Retweeted by Natalie Jackson

    Like

    • rumpole2 says:

      Yes obviously the “pot” is Raciss….. clearly it has PROFILED that kettle, and sees only that it is a BLACK kettle… and by implication… not a very good kettle.
      It seems to me if that is allowed to continue then “shine challenged” kettles will never be safe in kitchens where there are shiny pots!!!

      Like

      • lovemygirl says:

        Unrelated but the black kettle got me laughing since I was just looking up the price I paid for a 1/2 Kettle you sit by the fire (humidifier in the old days) that a friend wants to buy. Maybe my $96 black half kettle is only half racist?

        Like

        • rumpole2 says:

          (BTW There is no problem with your account at RT… but email if you are still having problems)
          Kettles can’t be raciss…!!
          …… not even half-kettles… they are the kitchen containers who have long been profiled and attacked by the shiny pots who have all the power in the kitchen. I think affirmative action is required… there should be laws forcing people to boil some eggs in a kettle rather than a pot!!
          ( and half of the eggs must be brown)

          Like

        • arkansasmimi says:

          ;) I would say it has a 50/50 chance of being only half racist

          Like

    • lepanto says:

      The Kettles explain their accounting

      Like

  11. MuayTyson says:

    Please excuse me for my ignorance as I do not follow the case as closely as the rest of you. Who are the family members and their relationships and how many children are involved? Just curious as it seems Traydad has had another child and there seems to be very little supervision of children and I am wondering if there would be a case for child services to be called?
    Thanks

    Like

    • libby says:

      It is hard to tell how many kids are involved or their relationships since they lie about their relationships so much (traydad usually has at least one wife and one fiancee at any given time). traymom was the mom that wasnt (she prolly lost custody of trayvon when she couldnt get him to go to school-truancy court).

      Like

    • tara says:

      I believe that Tracy is the father of at least 4 children by at least 4 different women, and he was married only to one of them. Sybrina is the mother of at least 2 children by at least 2 different men.

      Not sure about the various children of Tracy’s and Sybrina’s partners, who would be related to Trayvon in some way.

      Like

  12. arkansasmimi says:

    I guess I had my own new baby to be dealing with when Tawana Brawley story was out, or had just forgotten about it til reading here. I just happen to see this after reading a TH tweet about her. Like the last sentence…. Seems like the right thing to do… doesn’t it? Sounds like something Oprah and Iyanla need to look into right away!

    Read more at http://bossip.com/701229/blast-from-the-past-hate-crime-rape-fake-tawana-brawley-still-hiding-her-shady-past-has-yet-to-pay-dime-of-430k-she-owes-for-lying-on-prosecutor/#PXss0qftk1ZfO3zY.99

    Like

    • libby says:

      See, there is little to lose and lots to gain from a case like this

      Like

    • John Galt says:

      Deja Vu: Sharpton & Mason — Brawley didn’t cooperate with law enforcement because of alleged coverup.

      Like

    • jordan2222 says:

      Even more incredible than her lie is that this lie made Sharpton famous and he has never backed down from it. When people show admiration for Al, as most blacks do, what does that say about them? How on earth can you respect a man who was a major player in the most twisted lie ever told? I don’t get it and I don’t want to get it.

      Like

      • John Galt says:

        “How on earth can you respect a man who was a major player in the most twisted lie ever told?”

        Dunno, ask Crump.

        Like

      • LetJusticePrevail says:

        Al Sharpton is a bloviating blowhard who insults the intelligence of anyone who bothers to listen to him. He has no manners whatsoever and cannot engage in a civilized conversation. His usual tactic is to lie lie lie, and when challenged he changes the subject, talks over anyone else who tries to speak,and then lies some more. How this fraud EVER got his own show on MSNBC is beyond me.

        Like

  13. lovemygirl says:

    I just realized the fiasco of the Zimmerman case makes far more sense than what is going on in our Government right now.
    I need a drink.

    Like

  14. margegunderson says:

    Hello and Happy New Year!

    Did y’all see the interview with Sybrina in Essence magazine? Wonder when they framed that picture? lolol!

    http://www.essence.com/2012/12/28/exclusive-trayvon-martins-mom-sybrina-fulton-reflects-2012-wants-justice-2013

    Like

    • That’s a good one. Sybrina quote shows she has hoplophodia:

      “….When I hear the NRA’s recent comments on gun control I think they probably won’t understand until it hits their home. Only then will they say something about needing tougher gun control laws. Nobody wants to take the 2nd amendment from anyone, but I think we do need to revise the laws….. 

”

      She would keep the 2nd amendment but allow flintlocks only.

      Like

  15. raiikun says:

    Heh my guess is that it’s an automated thing on the Seminole County court website, but George’s court docket is showing Alva as the judge for his case.

    Like

    • LetJusticePrevail says:

      Thanks for pointing that out. I see the same thing, and reach the same conclusion. It should be funny to see how the TrayHuggers react, though.

      Like

  16. Ron Callaway says:

    Sybrina there were 532 shot in Chicago in 2012, where guns are banned.
    Probably 99% of shooters looked like Obama.
    Kennesaw Ga. pass a law where every house had to have a gun and ammo
    and crime dropped 89%.
    More people need guns to shoot back when attacked.

    Like

  17. allhail2 says:

    Sundance, you have mail.

    Like

  18. manoncanal says:

    Oops
    I should have said 532 killed. There were hundred more shot but survived.

    Like

  19. jordan2222 says:

    send email and await response. Thanks. /SD

    Like

  20. sundance says:

    D-Man, I think Judge Nelson is actually NO LONGER the GZ judge.

    D-Man please send email (unrelated)

    Jordan222 – Contact treehouse via email…..

    Thanks.

    Like

  21. diwataman says:

    Like

    • rumpole2 says:

      Have I entered the Twilight Zone?
      Can other people see a Dman post quoting Tony Pipitone says Defence cancelled next week’s hearing because there are no motions pending???

      Like

      • howie says:

        Maybe the writ of quo warranto by shellie’s lawyer stirred up the pot. Alls quiet on the western front.

        Like

      • diwataman says:

        Dude, I am so in the same Twilight Episode as you. Apparently in this episode there’s a new judge and no hearings or motions in the George Zimmerman case and no one reports on it or files it in the docket. God knows how this episode will end but that’s the fun of entering the Twilight Zone.

        Like

  22. howie says:

    Hmmm. State maybe go away? Cant’t take defense investigation?

    Like

    • diwataman says:

      It’s like everyone went away, O’Mara, the judge, the state, the news. It’s like everyone just said “okay, we’re done”, lol. It’s truly bizarre. I have no idea what’s going on with this case.

      Like

      • howie says:

        Maybe they let him go if he keep quiet. That might be it.

        Like

      • margegunderson says:

        Except Sybrina is still around. Insisting upon” justice” $$$$$$$.

        Like

        • eastern2western says:

          I do not understand why they are still asking for more money. the funeral costs are probably already paid off and they no longer need legal expenses because the state has taken over. The only time they ever need some legal representation is when ever the lawyers decide to show up and have some kind of media conference.

          Like

          • theparagons says:

            They need money to go around the country and brainwash the black communities. They’re trying to get support for the trial – and I believe it’s working. Black people think George murdered TM because he was black. Most nights Sybrina sleeps in hotels.That gets pretty expensive.

            Like

      • John Galt says:

        Maybe trying to get the phone and social media info in hand before attempting to depose Crump and DD.

        Like

      • jello333 says:

        There’s a different kind of dark / The kind that stops the dogs to bark

        Like

    • jello333 says:

      Something is afoot…

      Like

  23. diwataman says:

    http://gzlegalcase.com/index.php/press-releases/76-zimmerman-defense-waives-january-8-hearing

    “On October 12, 2012, the Zimmerman defense filed a Motion to Schedule Standing Hearings to Address Discovery and Other Case Management Issues. In response to our motion, the Judge has pre-scheduled a number of hearings that can be used if the defense or the state has motions to bring before the court. The next pre-scheduled hearing was set for January 8; however, the defense and the state have agreed that there are currently no matters that can be appropriately addressed by the Court on that date, so we have chosen to waive the January 8 hearing. The next hearing is scheduled for February 5, and we anticipate there will be new motions put before the court in advance of that hearing date.”

    Like

    • howie says:

      Velly interesting. That CRS Motion.

      Like

    • brutalhonesty says:

      feb 5th huh? I posed on Insession earlier that I hope there is a massive evidence dump on either feb 5th or feb 26th, to silence any of their rhetoric on those specific dates. You know they will be cranking it up for his birthday and the anniversary of his death….hard to play victim when all the evidence of georges innocence is made public that very same day and the media jumps on it (hopefully).

      Like

  24. tara says:

    Do any of the idiots who write articles about gun control in regard to the Trademark shooting realize that if GZ hadn’t been armed that night he might have ended up dead and Trademark would have been charged with murder?

    It really scares me that many of these idiots vote. They are incapable of processing facts with logical thought.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s