“we found out [through discovery] some information we were not told before… – Mark O’Mara
George Zimmerman Case Hearing (Full Hearing Content) The Prosecution Team, along with Natalie Jackson, Benjamin Crump, Daryl Parks, Ryan Julison, and affiliated interests up to and including the Legal Prosecutorial Representatives of The State of Florida are now on notice…… There are serious legal consequences for intentional collusion toward Malicious Prosecution.
1
Many people jumped on this comment snippet as soon as it was tweeted by the media. I sensed something was off with the media lead on the comment itself, so I witheld opinion until I could see and hear the context. Having said that the term “optimal” was placed into the conversation by Jon Stewart.
However, Jon Stewart was talking about the poor presidential response, and the confusing explanations from the White House, Spokesperson(s), the larger administration per se’, and the President himself. In essence the “confused messaging” was not optimal.
If President Obama was responding to the poor “messaging” descriptive then any outrage would have been seriously misplaced, because we all agree the confusing messaging was far from optimal. Heck, it was absurdly ridiculous.
BUT…
…. When President Obama responded to Jon Stewart Obama was not talking about the “messaging”, he was talking about the “event”.
So therefore EVERY CINTILLA OF BACKLASH for this horrifically worded response is ABSOLUTELY APPROPRIATELY PLACED. (more…)
(From Complex ) Earlier today, [actually two days ago now] a website claiming to have potentially damning information about one of the presidential candidates appeared on the web: Calling itself An October Surprise, the site is pretty bare save for the text, “One of your presidential candidates isn’t being honest with you. Stay tuned to find out which one it is,” and a timer counting down to exactly 5:30 pm ET on October 22nd, which is when whatever possessed “evidence” the person behind the site has is set to be revealed. An official Twitter for the page, @OctSurprise, was set up as well to add more intrigue and mystery to the site, with tweets assuring users that the info they have is “rock solid” and “irrefutable.”
Turns out, however, the website may not be exactly what it seems. (more…)
This is a follow-up to our previous outlining of intentional media manipulation during the last Presidential Debate – Specifically with CNN and the Obama Campaign. Their coordination is beyond refute at this point. Backstory Here and History Here.
Previously I shared: Occam’s Razor – Ladka is a NY Dem minded ideologue. However, if he was “registered as a Democrat” the Alinskyites would have chosen a different front man. Bottom Line Ladka aligns himself ideologically with Dear Leader. Hence, his “handlers”, while known or unknown, will carefully guide him into the spotlight…..
Water follows the path of least resistance. So does ideology. This Kerry Ladka guy is beyond a doubt a David Plouffe coordinated OFA strategic manuever. Just watch…..
Many readers and commentators posted discussion about the Libyan questioner “Kerry Lakda” and the ideology behind the approach. Initial research into Ladka is available HERE.
As the days advance, the cloud covering intentions are removed. Today is no exception.
Why would random undecided voter, Mr. Kerry Ladka, of Long Island NY, be calling media outlets, media pundits, and requesting to be on their shows? (more…)
In the history books of wool-over-sheeple-eye-removal this might, just might, go down as one of the most obvious and over-the-top Machiavellian media manuevers ever.
Watching it unfold on live TV it did not seem right. It was awkwardly and comfortably scripted, and too smooth in execution. But watching it on replay the agenda filled manipulation was obvious. It appears Candy Crowley and CNN together with the Obama Administration scripted the Libyan injection into the Presidential Debate.
I’m not just talking about Candy Crowley interjecting on behalf of President Obama, and interrupting Mitt Romney, I mean the whole segment seemed like it was a set up.
So we did a little research:
Candy Crowley told Erin Burnett on CNN’s show Out Front, Monday Night 10/15, that she had collected the questions from the invited and vetted debate audience at Hofstra University and was reviewing them. This was Monday on the 7pm broadcast of Erin Burnett. The Debate was Tuesday.
When the question on Libya was asked by audience member Kerry Ladka, he prefaced the question by saying:
….this question actually comes from my, err, um, a brain trust of my friends at Global Telecom Supply in Mineola, yesterday we were sitting around talking about Libya…
If Candy Crowley already had the audience questions assembled the day before, how could Kerry Ladka and his brain trust friends have been writing one? (more…)
SNARE: a contrivance often consisting of a noose for entangling birds or mammals (1) : something by which one is entangled, involved in difficulties, or impeded (2) : something deceptively attractive…
WASHINGTON DC – President Obama’s campaign spokeswoman said that he “takes responsibility” for the security of U.S. diplomats, less than a day after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took the blame.
“President Obama takes responsibility for the safety and security of all diplomats serving overseas,” said Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki on Fox News today. “Secretary Clinton of course has a great amount of responsibility as Secretary of State.”
Psaki denied that Clinton’s remarks were a “coordinated roll-out” to shelter Obama ahead of the debate, as Fox’s Shepard Smith suggested. (more…)
Lying as a profession must be exhausting….. Trying to test the water temp on the media pool Cabinet Member, Ambassador Susan Rice, pokes head out. Briefly. Yet, doubles down on stupid.
WASHINGTON DC – U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, in her first public comments on Libya since her controversial account days after the attack, blamed intelligence community talking points for the faulty narrative.
The light-on-details explanation Monday came as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took responsibility for any security failures leading up to the consulate attack last month.
But with the accounts coming as both presidential candidates head into a debate Tuesday night that will focus in part on foreign policy, neither appeared to settle mounting questions on the Hill about how the administration got the story so wrong. (more…)
Probably because indeed he is. It is useful to remember this recent post about CNN as it pertains to covering up for the White House Cairo Embassy fiasco. Then watch the video:
Propaganda Panel. The 2012 U.S version of 1938/9 German media.
From March 8th, 2012 forward, the intentional manipulation of the media surrounding the Trayvon Martin shooting was evident. You know how it started and who started it. After 3 weeks of investigation, on March 16th, 2012, the law enforcement authorities stated there was nothing within their finding that disputed the statements and assertions of George Zimmerman. To the contrary their investigation was further supporting George Zimmerman’s account.
The “Scheme Team” (Benjamin Crump, Natalie Jackson, Ryan Julison, Daryl Parks, and the professional race-baiters) made a strategic decision.
At the time we described it as manufacturing “media evidence” in an attempt to draw distinction between factually based and lawful evidence, and a series of intentional evidentiary falsehoods perpetrated by a team of people, and facilitated by a willing media, who were more concerned with financial benefit than justice.
It appears the process of holding those folks to account has begun. As you can see from the recent discovery demand, there will be no effort spared to hold those person(s) of dubious intent to account; nor will there be any quarter provided. Sunlight is, as it has always been, the best disinfectant. (more…)
This was predictable. See the below Huffington Post article intended to create cover in advance of the Second Presidential Debate tomorrow. Their Goal is to make discussing the Benghazi attack seem like political opportunism, thereby stopping Mitt Romney from leveraging it against President Obama with honest questions.
(HuffPo) The father of Christopher Stephens, the United States ambassador who was killed in the attack in Libya last month, said Saturday that it would be “abhorrent” for his son’s death to be politicized in the presidential campaign.
In an interview with Bloomberg News, Jan Stevens said the attack on Benghazi and the ensuing investigation has no place in the upcoming election.
“The security matters are being adequately investigated,” Stevens, who is getting briefings from the State Department on the investigation, said. “We don’t pretend to be experts in security. It has to be objectively examined. That’s where it belongs. It does not belong in the campaign arena.”
Since the September 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Mitt Romney has been critical of President Obama’s response to the tragedy, slamming the president for lapses in security at the American compound. (more…)