Skip to the 04:45 mark for the “button conversation”

The following is a new article written by Jeff Weiner and picked up by The Los Angeles Times regarding Florida’s Stand Your Ground Law.   Over the next several days I am going to put together an outline for further discussion/investigation/research on the various entities with expressed interest in defeating the Stand Your Ground law and how they have come together.   However, for now here is what Ryan Julison’s Orlando media pal has put into the media fray 
ORLANDO, Fla. — The nation’s fixation on the shooting death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin has led many to question whether an impartial jury could be found for the trial of his killer, George Zimmerman.
But it’s possible a judge, not a jury, will decide Zimmerman’s fate. Zimmerman says he fired in self-defense, and many expect his lawyers will eventually ask for an immunity hearing under Florida’s controversial “stand your ground” law.

Often described as a “minitrial” in which the judge serves as jury, such hearings are unlike other criminal justice proceedings. (more…)

The sheer volume of rabid pro-Trayvon ideologues at the TreeHouse gates is staggering.  Seriously, I’m not kidding, it is staggering.  What is also unbelievable  is their level of complete disconnect from reality or fact-based information.  It goes to show how strongly embedded the initial portrayal of a false media narrative can be.
We can thank Trayvon Family media consultant Ryan Julison and ABC’s Matt Gutman for the primary false fabrication.  They, along with the ready enablers  in Orlando Sentinel’s Jeff Weiner and Rene Stutzman have really done a number on the factual psyche of millions.

Jeff Weiner and Rene Stutzman – Orlando Sentinel

Ryan Julison – Family Media Consultant – and – ABC Matt Gutman 

That said, if you ever wanted to give Ryan Julison or Matt Gutman the benefit of doubt, for whatever ridiculous reason, after reading this historical article from March 16th it would be virtually impossible.  But first, before revisiting, we need to set the stage in the form of a fact based reminder timeline. (more…)

The following article was written by Modesty Avian and appears in the Orlando Sentinel –

It was said of Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester that he would not be moved by emotional hysteria, but rather view things within reason and the law. However, after his decision last week to revoke George Zimmerman‘s bond, I doubt whether anyone can remain uninfluenced.
Humans have discovered that good wishes are essential to life. Imagine then, if groups of people, organizations, churches, politicians and media were to vilify and demonize a single individual. (more…)

Kyle Rogers from Examiner.Com deserves major credit for having the fortitude and courage to track, investigate, research and write about something the media refuses to discuss.   Hate Crimes.   Specifically, Black Hate Crimes.  Kyle even assembles an interactive map of the known hate crimes from the month of May.   This is a must read for any Truth Seeker willing to confront the rabid and insufferable culture of political correctness.

Over the past couple years major media bosses have publicly admitted to censoring black crime. Editors from the LA Times, Chicago Tribune, Washington Post, New York Times, and the Associated Press have all publicly confessed to censoring black crime. Recently I’ve personally been able to obtain statements from two media outlets admitting they have a policy of censoring black crime. This includes the Newark Star-Ledger and WYFF, the Greenville, SC NBC affiliate.
This censorship is all about politicizing the news. In 2007 the LA Times made an official statement saying that accurately reporting crime would “unfairly stigmatize racial groups.” In other words, politically correctness trumps public safety. This censorship is most blatant when the crime involves a black perpetrator and a white victim. Especially if racial hatred was a motive.
Since the media frenzy over Trayvon Martin, there have been a few sizable public scandals over the censorship of black on white crime. A few major media outlets have discussed the censorship of black on white crime including World Net Daily, The Blaze, Daily Caller, Rush Limbaugh, and Bill O’Reilly. However, as I am about to show you, the censorship has not slowed down. (more…)

HatTip to Sharon who followed up on the previous assertion from Ryan Julison about his company Facebook website posts showcasing his false racist storytelling mysteriously disappearing.   Here is what he posted earlier last month:
“User error”, pffffttt.  So it appears Mr. Julison deleted his own incriminating articles with his own words bragging about how he sold the racist Zimmerman narrative to the media.
For those of you not familiar with Ryan Julison or Julison Communications, Julison is the media consultant hired by Trayvon™ family attorneys Natalie Jackson and Benjamin Crump.
It was Julison who fabricated the entire narrative about the white 248 lb Neighborhood Watch Vigilante, George Zimmerman, hunting down the innocent Trayvon™ Martin and shooting him murdering him in cold blood just because he was black.
Julison was hired on March 5th a few days after Trayvon™ Martin was buried March 3rd.  We have outlined with great specificity how Ryan Julison specifically and intentionally lied when he fabricated stories sold to ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and various newspaper outlets including the New York Times.
It was Ryan Julison’s narrative that you find at ground zero for the racist nuclear blast that eventually led to at least one death, and dozens of brutal race based beatings and assaults on behalf of Justice For Trayvon™.  (If you want more details just enter his name in the site search box on the right side of the page, there is a lot). (more…)

WOW,  You simply must watch these videos – ALL OF THEM – for how the players engaged in the narrative during this Monday March 26th City Commission Meeting.   It is obvious how much pressure the city commission was under.   Listen to the speakers, the intensity, and look at the council members faces, including the mayor.

This is an example of how old school Lynch Mobs were created.   It is stunning, simply stunning.  Filled with lies and false statements including from Benjamin Crump.  The meeting minutes are available HERE.
The following media excerpt is from the New York Times “Lizette Alvarez“:

[…] On Monday evening, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Sharpton and the Martin family attended a City Commission meeting, which drew so many people that it was moved from City Hall to Sanford’s civic center. About 500 people sat on folding chairs inside and hundreds more stood outside watching on a jumbo screen, many wearing T-shirts saying, “Do I Look Suspicious?” or “My Hoodie Does Not Mean I’m a Criminal.”

“Something will change because of this,” said Tasha Barnes, 26. “It’s got to change. Police don’t want a riot, and if justice is not made, there will be a riot.”

Mr. Jackson, members of the Martin family and Mr. Sharpton spoke at the meeting, with Mr. Sharpton telling the Sanford city commissioners that the city is risking going down in history as Birmingham and other infamous cities did during the civil rights era

More information came out earlier in the day about Trayvon’s 10-day suspension from high school, a topic the family has been reluctant to discuss but that led to his being brought by his father to Sanford in the days before his death. (more…)

We originally shared the story of the Virginia Mob beating over a month ago. By then the original incident was already several weeks old because it was intentionally hidden from the public by the employers of the attacked, The Virginia Pilot.  Then a few weeks later, mid-May, four teens were arrested in the case.   Since then? (((crickets)))
Thank you Treeper CR for sending a reminder email to the TreeHouse tip-line.  Last night on Bill O’Reilly he brought up the issue of the 911 recordings again. The Norfolk Police Dept. still refuse to release the audio from the 911 call.  Even now, more than two months after the initial incident. Why?
Obviously there is something in the 911 call the Norfolk police are concerned about the public hearing.   Personally, I believe, in part due to the timing of the attack, and in part due to the method deployed, the mob attack was specifically related to racial anxiety drummed up by the Trayvon Martin Case.   It would not surprise me at all if on the audio of the 911 emergency call you could hear some of the attackers using the name Trayvon, or other racially toxic expletives.
But regardless of supposition, the police reasoning for NOT releasing the audio has never been clarified.   What are they hiding?  and Why are they hiding it?

(excerpt from BOR) The initial police report described the assault as a bias crime and a  16-year-old has been arrested. But now, the Norfolk police say it was not a bias  crime and are refusing to release the 911 tape saying that would hurt their  investigation. How? How could that be possible?

In addition, both victims have filed complaints against the Norfolk Police  Department alleging the investigation was mishandled and the cops didn’t really  want to arrest the assailants or even find them.  (more)

Police in Norfolk, Va., have arrested three more black teenagers in connection with a mob assault last month on two white reporters for the local newspaper, a case which has sparked national public outrage but little media attention.

Two 16-year-olds and one 13-year-old were taken into custody Saturday, each charged with two counts of simple assault by mob and one count of participation in a riot, both of which are misdemeanors. (more…)

Bond Hearing Scheduled for June 29th

HatTip Sibilj SANFORD, Fla. (WOFL FOX 35) – An attorney for the former neighborhood watch volunteer charged with killing Trayvon Martin has confirmed with FOX 35 that there will be a new bond hearing for his client later this month.

George Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark O’Mara, said a new bond hearing date is set for June 29.

Zimmerman returned to the Seminole County jail on Sunday, two days after his $150,000 bond was revoked. Prosecutors say Zimmerman and his wife misled a judge about how much money they had to put up for the bond.

SEMINOLE COUNTY, Fla. –  The legal team for the man  accused of shooting 17-year-old Trayvon Martin paid their client a visit Tuesday  evening.
George Zimmerman sits in  the Seminole County jail in a protective custody cell awaiting his next bond  hearing.
According to Mark O’Mara,  Zimmerman’s bond hearing will be June 29.
The bond hearing was  pushed back a couple of weeks because of scheduling issues with Judge Kenneth  Lester and the other attorneys.
Lester revoked Zimmerman’s  bond after the state alleged he and his wife conspired to lie to the court about  their finances.
Zimmerman’s attorney, Mark  O’Mara, said his client has learned his lesson that he has to be completely  truthful when he presents himself to the court.
O’Mara said he is happy to  have the time to prepare Zimmerman’s testimony, but said Zimmerman is worried  about his wife’s possible legal issues for not telling the truth during the  first bond hearing.
Shelly Zimmerman could  face perjury charges along with her husband for lying about the money, according  to veteran defense attorney Jeff Deen.

“He’s worried now because  the judge is now worried about their lack of candor,” said O’Mara.  “The focus  is going to be on Shelly, because Shelly is the one that didn’t state  affirmatively that the money was available when she knew it was there.  So, yes  we are going to have to deal with that.”

Zimmerman was fearful to  disclose the fact that he had more than $100,000 in a legal fund that he raised  on his website, according to O’Mara.
O’Mara said he is  confident he can keep Zimmerman’s explanation under oath to the judge limited  which limits the amount of cross examination he may face at the next  hearing.  (read more)
(more…)

By Alan Dershowitz:  State Attorney Angela Corey, the prosecutor in the George Zimmerman case, recently called the Dean of Harvard Law School to complain about my criticism of some of her actions.
She was transferred to the Office of Communications and proceeded to engage in a 40-minute rant, during which she threatened to sue Harvard Law School, to try to get me disciplined by the Bar Association and to file charges against me for libel and slander.

She said that because I work for Harvard and am identified as a professor she had the right to sue Harvard.
When the communications official explained to her that I have a right to express my opinion as “a matter of academic freedom,” and that Harvard has no control over what I say, she did not seem to understand.
She persisted in her nonstop whining, claiming that she is prohibited from responding to my attacks by the rules of professional responsibility — without mentioning that she has repeatedly held her own press conferences and made public statements throughout her career. (more…)