For several days the pontificating media have been parading around the various jurors in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial, using the mostly white women to frame the deliberations as sexist and insensitive to the emotional plight of a woman who strangled her three children to death with an exercise band.
Millions of middle-age, suburban, angry white females have proclaimed that American men should not have an opinion in the case while simultaneously using toxic sympathy as a weapon to defend the murderer. The previously described “one male holdout juror” who created a mistrial by failing to find the murdering mother not guilty, has been criticized directly or by implication by an aligned leftist media.
Today, things changed. Today, all the toxic, murder-supporting, leftist feminists found out the lone male holdout was a black man in his 30’s. Suddenly, you can hear a pin drop as silence falls upon the professional AWFLs (Affluent, White, Female, Leftists).
Gayle King was interviewing juror Paula Devlin on CBS Mornings today, and as she was maneuvering through the narrative to hold the progressive banner in a certain direction – she asked the questions that froze her.
The Juror, Paula Devlin explained the jury panel consisted of nine women and three men, with 11 white jurors and one person of color. “Was the person of color a woman or a man?” King asked. After Devlin said the juror was a man, King sought clarification. “Is the holdout juror … a Black man?” she asked. “Yes,” Devlin replied. “A Black man is the holdout juror?” King asked incredulously. “Yes,” Devlin said. Stunned with disbelief and now incapable of formatting the DEI agenda, “Woah, I have to sit with that for just a second,” King said. WATCH:
.
That explains why the media newsrooms, producers and media executives have not put the holdout juror through the traditional gauntlet of doxxing, vitriol, isolation, ridicule, personal targeting, marginalization and hate-filled public shaming. The professional left doesn’t know what to do.
If the holdout was a white male juror, he would already be under attack. Now, they’re stuck.
“Well, I have to sit with that for just a second…”
Yeah, you sit with that Gayle, and try to whip it into something it is not.
It is not anything your stereo typical leftist mind can control.
It is not anything your sick perverse hearts can conceive.
It is a man — no matter his race, creed or color — who is a man of character, something all your sitting will never understand.
Thank you for your comment Raven. It put a tear in my eye.
I will always remember Gayle king from the CBS 2016 election coverage. When it became apparent that Hillary was in trouble, she said lots of people she knows are on their knees praying to sweet Black Baby Jesus.
I love it when liberal heads explode. There’s nothing up there but it’s still entertaining to watch!
I guess he didn’t get the memo that murder is OK when:
You just feel sad.
It’s a conservative who says things you don’t like.
It’s a conservative who looks like they might say things you dont like.
It’s a CEO of an “evil” corporation
It’s a President you don’t like
It’s a child born or not yet born that might inconvenience your life in the future.
It’s an adult that is just kind of inconvenient to anyone, and you think you can talk them into “assisted suicide”
They are a death cult.
And in his 30s. Just dang. This ain’t supposed to happen.
I salute the lone juror. He, obviously, knew the difference between right and wrong, black and white.
Looney-Left Presstitutes
Is it possible the majority white older female(likely leftist) jurors are racist, and the single black man saw this and said “screw you too”?
From what I’ve heard this majority feminazi jury demeaned the one holdout juror while questioning his understanding of the evidence, at the same time telling him what to do. Doesn’t this sound like how a slave owners privileged wife might treat a slave?
He should have questioned their understanding of the evidence. Oh wait, apparently he did. Bravo!
That information slapped the Jackson Five right out of her.
I laughed much too much at that
Stop the presses. Another one got off the plantation.
This woman being interviewed. She says I want her not to be held responsible but, is against dismissal of this case entirely.
Emotion over logic.
Bless the individual who has morals over emotions.
I was wondering why the juror had not been publicly outed, harassed, and terrorized.
This makes perfect sense. Having a young, black man venture away from the Black and Young Plantations has got to destroy their messaging.
My guess is that this story will be buried unless they can find out that the juror is a Christian, Trump voter.
Nope, in the leftist mind if you are black you can’t be Christian.
That would be a triple whammy to the left: an man who thinks that murdering 3 children is wrong, he’s (uh oh) black, and even worse he’s a Christian. If they find out that he’s a Trump voter then they can breathe a sigh of relief because that will explain his “wrong think”.
Then they can all look at each other and understand where this young man went wrong.
You ain’t black if you don’t vote DemonRat.
“‘Woah, I have to sit with that for just a second,” King said.'”
Removing the professional restraint which is the result of her training as An Important Media Personality, King had exactly the same emotional response the foreman had when she began filling out the forms and discovered that there was not a consensus to her preconceived outcome.
Such individuals presume others will reflexively express deference both to themselves and conformity to the social order which they believe themselves to be an ideal representation of. When it is not shown and both their status and their social order is challenged, they do not know how react at first. Then they get violently angry like toddlers do, because that is the level of their emotional development.
It might have something to do with their intelligence and integrity, too!
She loved her children to death.
Good grief these people (the media, the AWFLs, the jurors, the defense attny, the judge) are all so ridiculous. The case never should have been televised.
And the jury should have been sequestered over a several weeks long trial with such emotional testimony.
Agreed! Now we’ll have to deal with the resulting social contagion fallout of other demonic psychos wanting to emulate Clancy.
That juror made sure not to elaborate that the only black man was the holdout. She only said it when pressed. Otherwise it would have never been mentioned.
Because to mention it would be racist and can’t have that from a modern feminazi.
I haven’t been following this at all, but I’m completely shocked that 11 out 12 jurors were willing to let this women off for killing her 3 children. I could care less the color or gender of the one holdout sane juror.
Gayle King cares about the color and the gender as long as he was a white male. This revelation rocked her racist, man-hating world.
She had to regroup and go in another direction.
Initially the vote appears to have been 8-4 in favor of acquittal. One juror admitted that during deliberations three changed their vote not guilty by reason of insanity.
Translation: the most radical, loud, obnoxious, and shameless jurors, whom we can safely presume are the ones basking in their 15 minutes of media fame and the blood of three children, successfully ganged up on the vote changers and bullied them into submission.
The social and racial dynamics of this are very interesting. Black men generally don’t give two s***s about the Liberal White Woman and her Opinions, and are not intimidated by either. It makes sense the one hold out would be a black guy.
We’re living in the end times.
Will the MSM treat this Black juror the same way they would treat a White juror making the same decision? If not, THEY are the racists.
I think we all know the answer to that!
“Holdout”, an interesting word choice. The left media may be using it to connote a malicious, spiteful, or dishonorable intent of the juror rather than principled courage. Supreme Court justices who disagree with the majority opinion are said to dissent. This juror should simply be referred to as a dissenter.
Yesterday one of the white male jurors said that it was extremely upsetting to the jury when the holdout juror used the exercise bands on a water bottle to show them what Clancy had done to her children. Now knowing the holdout juror was black makes that statement even more disgusting with racial undertones. They were more upset that a black man demonstrated to them what Clancy had done than what Clancy actually did to her babies.
That dude gets major props. I’d give that guy a hug and buy that guy a beer ASAP.
So, the jurors that have spoken out have all admitted to trying to pressure this black man into their way of thinking???
When will they be labeled as racist??
The rabbit hole just gets deeper and deeper. 🐰
Curiouser and curiouser…. 🫣🙃
May not be Wonderland— but it does make one wonder about this land. 🤔
She should go ahead and spin while she’s sitting on it
Moving past that the holdout juror was a black man, look at his age! Described as “in his 30’s.” That actually surprised me more than his race. Can’t help but wonder if he has children of his own.
Ha…Ha-Ha…HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Curious of his age now. Must be >35.
Wow, the left is serious about their racism. I have never seen it so glaringly. And the fact that there’s been none of the extreme shunning and humiliation, which I myself have been subject to from the press, as a white female. In fact they made sure to bring up that I am not poor (though more like upper middle class–especially in comparison to their abundances of wealth). You can’t hate the press enough. As President Trump said at the RNC, that in order to have a healthy country, you must have an honest press. That we do not have.