Many of us are watching the story of a woman, Lindsay Clancy, who is accused of murdering her three young children in 2023 in their Massachusetts home. The widely discussed case is being tried in Plymouth Superior Court, and after five days of jury deliberations the jury has again told the judge they are hopelessly deadlocked.
Clancy killed her three children [Cora (5), Callan (8 months), and Dawson (3)], that aspect is not in question; she strangled them with an exercise band. However, the defense has argued that Clancy was suffering from postpartum psychosis, and she is not criminally responsible. Prosecutors argued Clancy knew right from wrong and acted deliberately, pointing to evidence of her planning, and the fact she hid her thoughts of harming the children from doctors because she knew they were wrong.
The jury is made up of nine women and three men. The jury cannot decide if Clancy is criminally responsible for killing her children. The jury has deliberated for five days and has reported twice before they are deadlocked. Superior Court Judge William Sullivan responded with a Tuey-Rodriguez charge, an instruction that urges deadlocked jurors to keep working toward a verdict while reminding them not to abandon their own honestly held views.
Rather than declaring a mistrial, the judge allowed the jurors to go home for the day. It looks like tomorrow a mistrial will be declared.
(Via Fox News) – The instruction that Judge William Sullivan gave to the Lindsay Clancy jury on Wednesday takes its name from two Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court decisions.
In Commonwealth v. Tuey (1851), the court approved an instruction encouraging deadlocked jurors to re-examine their views with an open mind. More than a century later, in Commonwealth v. Rodriguez (1973), the state’s highest court revised that language to remove pressure on minority or holdout jurors, creating a neutral instruction that asks all jurors to carefully consider one another’s views while maintaining their own honestly held convictions.
Receiving a Tuey-Rodriguez charge does not mean a verdict is imminent. The instruction is generally considered a necessary step before a judge declares a mistrial because of a hung jury, although it often results in jurors reaching a unanimous verdict after further deliberations. (read more)
The trial has gathered considerable national attention because a remarkably large number of women support Ms. Clancy and claim that many women suffer from extreme hormone imbalances and are not responsible for their conduct or behavior. The supporter group has a lot of commonalities with the women who previously wore genitalia on their heads.
Many American men are, for the first time, looking at the hormonal claims of the Clancy defenders and asking themselves some very serious questions about the mental stability of a large swath of American women. Meanwhile another significant group of American men remind them this is not new.
The ramifications of a “not guilty” decision are considerable.
“Prosecutors argued Clancy knew right from wrong and acted deliberately, pointing to evidence of her planning, and the fact she hid her thoughts of harming the children from doctors because she knew they were wrong.”
She HID her thoughts because she knew.
Pslam 106 v 37-38
They even sacrificed their sons
And their daughters to demons,
38And shed innocent blood,
The blood of their sons and daughters,
Whom they sacrificed to the idols of Canaan;
And the land was polluted with blood.
https://biblehub.com/search.php?q=innocent+blood
not following the case
however
there are too many similar incidents over the decades
it is time the pharmaceutical companies
psychiatric drugs be evaluated more thoroughly
(if in fact they ever were evaluated in any true sense)
along with the doctors that prescribe them
She admitted to killing the children. 3 innocent children which SHE brought into this world. No sane person could do this, voices or no voices. There should be an option that says Guilty but Insane, Temporarily or Permanently and it should carry a penalty of life in prison if it is deemed to qualify as first degree murder. It should take the death penalty off the table and time should be served in a maximum security mental institution.
As for the women supporting her, I am inclined to question their sanity as well. What has happened to women in the last 20 years? After fighting for equality and passing Title IX, now they suddenly are unclear on what a woman is and are willing to cede their gains to the whims of men posing as women. I completely understand why so many people are calling them the AWFuLs now. At this point, and looking at the most prominent women in Congress, it makes you wonder if a mistake was made giving women the vote.
no woman should be President EVER. Also, will you feel comfortable in the future with a woman pilot of an airplane? Battleship? even a car?
While the post-partum issue is making the headlines most frequently, and that is the issue which the political organizers have pushed, there are other important facts in this case, and one big glaring elephant in the room: those horrible psychotropic drugs which the pharmaceutical pushing doctors gave her. A big question in this case is: to what extent are we going to hold people responsible for their actions after they have taken so many of those – doctor-prescribed – mind altering drugs ?
That question which lingers in the air after the presence of those drugs in every school shooting and plenty of other mass murders and horrible crimes has never been squarely confronted in the courts. Our common law has evolved into a framework to handle people who get drunk and commit crimes, or get drunk and drive, or most recently – consume marijuana and drive. But what about people who consume those psychotropic drugs prescribed by their doctors and then – literally – go crazy ?
To what extent are we going to hold these people culpable ? Dr. Peter Breggin’s book Toxic Psychiatry is a sobering start.
I do not know the answers. I do know it is a tough question.
Massachusetts just celebrated a law that allows abortion up until the day of birth. The people of Massachusetts overwhelmingly support baby murder – so how is this any different?
If there was any decency or justice in our society and institutions, she would be convicted and given the death penalty.
We need to mainstream the language – “TOXIC WOMEN.”
Well, this womans supporters have guaranteed there will never be a female president…because of hormones, and on the other hand, all the psych drugs shes been on AND her ‘hormones’, proves the case for trans people being nut jobs too…because of ‘hormones’ & psych drugs they are on, making it ok to murder….and blame hormones. Come Jesus, come….please…
Postpartum Depression and anxiety is real and increases with every birth for the mother. End period.
The list of psychotropic drugs prescribed were a cesspool of junk science and junk psychology, the care plan was as useless as throwing spaghetti at the wall to see if it is cooked. I thought the female psychologists themselves looked and acted like they were mentally ill.
Lindsay’s fan club wants desperately to implicate Patrick, the Husband and Father, like half the blame for the deaths is his. And insane finger pointing that he did’t love her, or his children, and knowingly let her kill them.
The ‘Tulip Mania Feminists”, society is puking up at the moment, look to have a particular type of Mass Psychosis, sypathizing with murderers.
I get stuck grabbling with the ‘hearing voices’ and the spinal cord injury. Hearing voices was either real or her get out of jail card. Throwing herself out the window, which you can see when you drive by the house, always makes me think that throwing herself out the window was an act of desperation. She knew what she did, in that moment and wanted to die. In my mind that was a half sane decision, instead of facing what she just committed in the basement.
When the Detectives spoke to her she admitted it, with shame.
Lindsay murdered the children and the Fan Club saying otherwise, are Big Pharma’s mindless client base.
That base of vacant hearted females is endless, as long as they have the transponder in the hand and a comment section somewhere to share the insanity and misery of their collective delusional rationalism together on Instagram. They only see victims, zero responsibility taking is one of their motto’s. Everything is everybody else’s fault.
I was a juror for a civil case in Texas where a contractor was shorted the final payment and his earth moving equipment was stolen. The multi million dollar contract was done with a handshake. A liberal woman juror refused to believe that a contract that large was done with an agreement and a handshake. The two parties even admitted they had an agreement. The super wealthy land owner had his crew steal several large earth moving pieces down the road to another property. The contractor found them with his small airplane on land owned by the same land owner. The final payment was 800k and millions worth of dozers and dumpers were hidden. This lady wanted to dismiss the case because she couldn’t believe such a large contract wasn’t notarized in triplicate, signed by the mayor and held in a vault. The terms were written down and signed followed by a handshake. The land owner claimed anyone could have faked his signature. But over 1.5 million was paid out by the land owner to the contractor over 7 months as progress was made clearing 50 acres of forest into a McNeighborhood. Even with all that she refused, saying there’s no proof of an agreement. Emails, payments, permits all with the land owner and contractors names on them but she thinks that because he didn’t get “a certified contract” whatever that means, she didn’t agree that the contractor was owed money. She’s an er nurse and thought she knew better than the parties involved. I was the sole voice of reason saying nothing here is contested except the final payment and the mysteriously moved equipment. The contractor won but I couldn’t believe how adamant she was in thinking any large deal is always laid out by lawyers and signed by officials or it didn’t happen. I informed her that it is common in construction for deals to be made man to man on a handshake and the details are recorded later. Especially in larger ground clearing and earthmoving operations between two private parties.
The land owner said “Well I had to try lol”.
It was just a game to him, ruining the life of the contractor was an acceptable outcome to save a few million.
Sigh. Why does everyone have to take every aspect of this tragedy and amp it into a ridiculous conclusion?
Let’s give Clancy the benefit of the doubt and say it really was caused by postpartum depression.
So okay. What is the right solution. The argument we should be having is how long do we put her in a mental institution.. or prison.
No the real issue we should be noting here is who is hyping and organizing these women to CHEER for Clancy? This isn’t organic as the media covers it nonstop.
well, it looks like they found another use for their pu*** hats.
What a stupid sign that woman in the foreground is holding. These people are willfully ignorant. No wonder women had no right to vote, nor could serve as jurors!