There is an aspect in the Callais decision that will make it almost impossible for a state to have a racially gerrymandered district. The Court required a “strict scrutiny” analysis of any such state action.

The importance of the strict scrutiny standard, which is applied to claims of racial or religious discrimination, is that it shifts the burden of proof.

Burdens of proof determine what presumptions are made, such as the presumption of innocence in a criminal case. The presumption puts the burden of proof on the prosecutor. A smart defense lawyer can sometimes win a case just by attacking the prosecution evidence, while introducing none of his own.

In other kinds of discrimination lawsuits besides race or religion, the plaintiff has the burden of proof showing that the law is discriminatory. If a 19-year-old wanted to challenge a drinking age, he would be faced with a legal presumption that the distinction between age groups was proper. If a non-resident wanted resident tuition at a state university, she’d have to show that such a distinction was improper.

But when you get to strict scrutiny, the presumption switches, and the law is presumed to be discriminatory, and the state has to prove otherwise. This is a very high, almost impossible standard to meet. The state must show that there is a “compelling state interest” (very serious government goal) in sorting out people by race or religion.

That’s why Kagan complained that while the majority hadn’t struck down the provision of the VRA in question, but the majority had made it so difficult to prove at case that the racially-defined district was valid that the majority might as well have.

A very clever move by Alito. .He may have taken this narrowing approach to get to six votes. Just striking down this section might have lost him Roberts…or more.

Take it as a good win, even if Section 2 was not struck down in its entirety.

This was a pretty simple ruling, in summary:
The only colors you can use to gerrymander your state are for Red & Blue. Also another tip, looking at you Virginia, you need to follow your state’s constitution. I expect their recent election efforts to be overturned by either their Supreme Court or if necessary SCOTUS.

The Light Bringer is gonna lose it. GOOD!!!

Racists are most particularly aggrieved by this decision.

MNN BREAKING…

* OBAMA SAYS AFTER TODAY’S AWFUL DECISION, HE MAY HAVE TO START SHOOTING AT JUSTICES, TOO

Two Wins today:

SCOTUS Just Ruled in Favor of a Pro-Life Pregnancy Center Targeted by New Jersey’s Attorney General
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/amy-curtis/2026/04/29/scotus-first-choice-womens-resource-centers-n2675247?fbclid=IwY2xjawRfZtpleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFWbHdaSWYyZzFMUzNvMHlkc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHvtKyq75-UvnaerptniX1YpPj62u3Uxpgm2Ga475OROG9mPHQZ1VSyW0fVww_aem_q-5Zyu7tbPXcTvb1XqZL_A

Obama and his “democracy”..

(Ladylike spit)

Where his 50.5% percent (through gerrymandering and cheating) can exert tyranny over the 49.5% rest of us.

And will.

Now, where are those Blue State voter rolls stuffed with illegal aliens and dead folk…

Will this end up tossing any of the insufferable POC in Congress, the ones who specifically target whites in their vitriol?

Well its racial discrimination so……

Thank goodness for a common sense ruling that eliminates discrimination against the whole voting electorate and allows for more fair elections and representation.

States need to eliminate all unconstitutional racially gerrymandered districts forthwith otherwise the election outcomes of those districts are subject to being thrown out in court after the election when challenged in court.

It is a good week.

U.S. Supreme Court upholds Texas’ newly redrawn congressional map

Maybe Trump can get Cuba and the Iran deal put away by Friday. Save Act by Monday.

Two observations from today’s decision:

One, Elena Kagan finally penned something I agree with: “The consequences are likely to be far-reaching and grave.” If you believe in a colorblind society of equal justice under the law, then today’s decision is a matter of weeping and gnashing of teeth because it’s a game-changer that removes a pillar of Democrat governance – dividing society based on inherently artificial characteristics. But if you believe that the Constitution actually advances the cause of equal justice, and that in the eyes of God we are all of equal dignity as His image bearers, then not dividing people according to “race” is to be celebrated as it actually advances King’s vision of a society where we are not judged by the color of our skin but the content of our character. Kagan, as a justice of the court, should be ashamed of herself. Her opinion hearkens back to antebellum times, when the court treated people as inherently different based upon skin color. Thank you, Elena Kagan, for exposing at the highest levels of politics the endemic racism of the Left. The late Robert Byrd, in full Klan robes, could not have made this more clear than she.

Two, and I’ve posted about this before – “Barry” Obama just cannot shut up to save his life. His appalling narcissism and need for attention are unbecoming of one who once held our highest office. It’s a given that, as a creature of the Left, he’ll still be voting for the next 100 years – that’s baked into the corrupt equation of life in America. But I believe that even then he’ll buck tradition and we’ll be reading afresh his snarkish commentary from the grave.

J

Oh my so many years of using racism to short change those that don ‘t has now been brought to a halt.

Alito’s opinion was 36 pages long. Kagan’s dissent (Sotomayor and KBH joined in) was 48 pages long.

One would think in a nation of DEI there would be a 9-0 decision against racccissmmm.

This decision should have been put forth in 1965.

Democrats complaining about this ruling effectively admit that they think all black voters “belong” to Democrats regardless of policies nor how terrible a candidate might be.

It’s good that Barry is just a remnant of the past. He’s trying hard, tho.

What part of not using race as a discrimination factor in government related activities, like elections, doesn’t compute for morons like Kagan?

Lately we are sure seeing a plethora of appearances and tweets from the marxist left’s half black savior. He must be worried.

So the number one question of the day, IMHO, is if the three harpies delayed long enough to prevent States from rectifying their districts prior to the upcoming election?

If the Democrats could actually lose 20 seats in November, it will be significantly harder for the Rinos to turn the house over to them in the fall, which we all know they are dying to do!

Finally high court comes with true justice rather than disguised politics. Truth wins one for the KIng.

This ruling by the Supreme Court is progress toward a colorblind society with equal protection under the law. It should also be interpreted to prohibit the Federal Government from asking people their race. Every federal form asks for race. People hate having to answer the question to be able to interact with their government. There should be no registration by race.

The current congressional map has been found unconstitutional by U.S. Supreme Court.

The plaintiffs should seek to enjoin the ongoing election process so that a lawful map can be implemented, rather than being required to vote under a map that has been determined to be a racial gerrymander.

I believe that the timing of the Court’s opinion effectively forces the upcoming election to proceed under the existing map, raising concerns about whether the Democrat Justices delay the availability of a constitutional remedy before voting occurs.

“The leftist/activist justices (Kagan, Sotomayor and the DEI Justice Brown-Jackson), had intentionally been slow-walking their dissent opinion
[…]to stop ‘Republican’ states from using the majority ruling for redistricting purposes prior to this year’s midterm federal election.”

If Republicans on any court were guilty of this sort of radical activism, the nationwide Dem screams for their impeachment would be deafening.

But we will have to settle with this dishonorable tactic being yet another example for posterity of what the Democrats really are.

Winning one fight at a time……

NO MERCY!

John Roberts describing a snake stretching across the country. Priceless.

Chickens coming home to roost, Hussein.

Did Sean Spicer’s outing of the dissenters’ alleged slow walk affect the timing?

https://headlineusa.com/liberal-justices-meddle-in-midterms/

Couldn’t have hurt.

SCOTUS ruling could shift up to 19 House seats from blue into red corner

I. Justice Thomas: “Today’s decision should largely put an end to this “disastrous misadventure” in voting-rights jurisprudence.”

He nailed it in his short concurring opinion (pp 43-44), joined by Justice Gorsuch [1]:

• SCOTUS should never have interpreted §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA) to ef fectively give racial groups an entitlement to roughly pro portional representation. Blacks were drawn into ‘black districts’ and given ‘black repre sentatives’; Hispanics [we]re drawn into Hispanic districts and given ‘Hispanic representatives’; and so on.
• As I explained more than 30 years ago, I would go further and hold that § 2 VRA does not regulate districting at all.  The words in §2 instead “reach only ‘enactments that regulate citizens’ access to the ballot or the processes for counting a ballot’; they ‘do not include a State’s .choice of one districting scheme over another. Therefore, no § 2 VRA challenge to districting should ever succeed

II. Changing Colors
A joint report (10/8/25) from Fair Fight Action (Stacey Abrams) and Black Voters Matter (LaTosha Brown and Cliff Albright) estimated that an overhaul of the VRA could swing an estimated 19 Democratic-held House districts in favor of Republican candidates. [2] If the processes are quick enough to influence results of 2026 midterms has to be seen.

[1] 24-109 Louisiana v. Callais (04/29/2026)
[2] 19 New GOP House Seats: Supreme Court Case Could Gut Voting Rights Act, Cement One-Party Control — Black Voters Matter

The idea that a black citizen has to have a black representative or they are being disenfranchised is in and of itself racist.

Elena “Fred Flinstone” Kagan, Sonia “Wise Latina” Sotonayor, Ketanji The Remedial Law Student, and Barack The Flamboyant Kenyan Muslim can all go suck an egg.

Each one of those cretins is a low IQ Marxist Revolutionary. They are mad that the revolution is sputtering. President Trump and the MAGA movement are winning.

Even with all of the turmoil, this is a glorious time to be alive. Almighty God is working in magnificent ways to save our constitutional republic.

Pray continually and God will bless us!

Sotomayor surely peed her underwear. The pee was very sweet because she is a diabetic.
Kagan contorted her face in anger which made her look uglier than she already is.
Brown Jackson’s face turned purple and she tore up her pack of race cards.

Trump has been tearing it up lately. The leftists really hate this cartoon.

When Obama says “such setbacks can be overcome”, he is referring to the strategies laid out by some of his former and current advisors for the Democrats to get back control of both houses of Congress and the White House so that they can pack the Supreme Court.  

For them, it is about political power and has nothing to do with race. They are going to make this decision the only thing (other than bad-man orange) that minorities and their AWFL activists hear about until the mid-term elections. And if that doesn’t do the trick, they will throw in a healthy dose of election and voter fraud. It will be all-out warfare from now until November. Of course, that is what it already is, even if many GOPe types like Thune don’t want to know about it.

Reading between the lines, Barry was signaling his brain-dead minions to vote early, often, and especially if they’re no longer alive.

Now if the Supreme Court rules correctly in Watson vs. Republican National Committee, that election day means votes must be received and counted on election day, this will neuter the mail in voting of counting until desired outcome is reached. The Supreme Court doing, piece by piece case by case, what the Senate will not do in passing the Save America Act.

Multiethnic and even more so multiracial democracy is just tribal raiding parties formalized with paperwork and in slow motion. There isn’t a shred of legitimacy left in the broken bleeding corpse that used to be called ‘America’.

Now, shut down birthright citizenship and the Haitian TPS crap! 🤔

Now do Illinois. Ya wanna see a snake😖?

Good.

“ Race should not be a consideration in the drawing of district boundaries.”

Unless it benefits the democrat party, of course.

Great news! If Obummer is against it, I’m 100% for it.

This evening I will raise my glass to the SCOTUS majority, and give thanks to God for another win.

Again, obummer is a has-been. Shut up already. I think he is the one that wants to be a king.

The leftist/activist justices (Kagan, Sotomayor and the DEI Justice Brown-Jackson), had intentionally been slow-walking their dissent opinion in order to delay the release of the high court ruling released today. The delay tactic was intended to stop ‘Republican’ states from using the majority ruling for redistricting purposes prior to this year’s midterm federal election.

Well, isn’t that political of you……….

So what I’m reading is that it’s okay to gerrymander based on political party, right?
Like Massachusetts, where there are nine democrat Congressional representatives and zero republican even though 25% of the voters are Republican.
Or California where democrat voters versus Republican is 45% to 25%, the rest independent, but Congressional representatives number 43 versus 9; whereas if seats were distributed based on political party, there would be 25 democrat, 13 republican, and 16 independent.
Perfectly legal to gerrymander based on political affiliation, huh?
This seems unfair.

This decision is potentially more far reaching than just the South.

It may impact many urban areas throughout the northeast and rust belt. Traditional Democrat strongholds.