President Trump reacts to the Supreme Court ruling with much the same perspective of many MAGA supporters.
For most of us the core of MAGA policy surrounds economics; specifically, GDP growth, jobs and wages. Economic security is national security. Immigration enforcement, border security and other priorities come after MAGAnomics.
PRESIDENT TRUMP – “The Supreme Court’s Ruling on TARIFFS is deeply disappointing! I am ashamed of certain Members of the Court for not having the Courage to do what is right for our Country. I would like to thank and congratulate Justices Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh for your Strength, Wisdom, and Love of our Country, which is right now very proud of you.
When you read the dissenting opinions, there is no way that anyone can argue against them. Foreign Countries that have been ripping us off for years are ecstatic, and dancing in the streets — But they won’t be dancing for long! The Democrats on the Court are thrilled, but they will automatically vote “NO” against ANYTHING that makes America Strong and Healthy Again. They, also, are a Disgrace to our Nation.
Others think they’re being “politically correct,” which has happened before, far too often, with certain Members of this Court when, in fact, they’re just FOOLS and “LAPDOGS” for the RINOS and Radical Left Democrats and, not that this should have anything to do with it, very unpatriotic, and disloyal to the Constitution. It is my opinion that the Court has been swayed by Foreign Interests, and a Political Movement that is far smaller than people would think — But obnoxious, ignorant, and loud!
This was an important case to me, more as a symbol of Economic and National Security, than anything else. The Good News is that there are methods, practices, Statutes, and other Authorities, as recognized by the entire Court and Congress, that are even stronger than the IEEPA TARIFFS, available to me as President of the United States of America and, in actuality, I was very modest in my “ask” of other Countries and Businesses because I wanted to do nothing that could sway the decision that has been rendered by the Court.
I have very effectively utilized TARIFFS over the past year to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. Our Stock Market has just recently broken the 50,000 mark on the DOW and, simultaneously, 7,000 on the S&P, two numbers that everybody thought, upon our Landslide Election Victory, could not be attained until the very end of my Administration — Four years! TARIFFS have, likewise, been used to end five of the eight Wars that I settled, have given us Great National Security and, together with our Strong Border, reduced Fentanyl coming into our Country by 30%, when I use them as a penalty against Countries illegally sending this poison to us. All of those TARIFFS remain, but other alternatives will now be used to replace the ones that the Court incorrectly rejected.”
“To show you how ridiculous the opinion is, the Court said that I’m not allowed to charge even $1 DOLLAR to any Country under IEEPA, I assume to protect other Countries, not the United States which they should be interested in protecting — But I am allowed to cut off any and all Trade or Business with that same Country, even imposing a Foreign Country destroying embargo, and do anything else I want to do to them — How nonsensical is that? They are saying that I have the absolute right to license, but not the right to charge a license fee. What license has ever been issued without the right to charge a fee? But now the Court has given me the unquestioned right to ban all sorts of things from coming into our Country, a much more powerful Right than many people thought we had.
Our Country is the “HOTTEST” anywhere in the World, but now, I am going in a different direction, which is even stronger than our original choice. As Justice Kavanaugh wrote in his Dissent:
“Although I firmly disagree with the Court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a President’s ability to order tariffs going forward. That is because numerous other federal statutes authorize the President to impose tariffs and might justify most (if not all) of the tariffs issued in this case…Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232); the Trade Act of 1974 (Sections 122, 201, and 301); and the Tariff Act of 1930 (Section 338).”
Thank you Justice Kavanaugh!
In actuality, while I am sure they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court’s decision today made a President’s ability to both regulate Trade, and impose TARIFFS, more powerful and crystal clear, rather than less. There will no longer be any doubt, and the Income coming in, and the protection of our Companies and Country, will actually increase because of this decision. Based on longstanding Law and Hundreds of Victories to the contrary, the Supreme Court did not overrule TARIFFS, they merely overruled a particular use of IEEPA TARIFFS. The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a Foreign Country’s ability to conduct Trade with the United States under IEEPA, has been fully confirmed by this decision. In order to protect our Country, a President can actually charge more TARIFFS than I was charging in the past under the various other TARIFF authorities, which have also been confirmed, and fully allowed.
Therefore, effective immediately, all National Security TARIFFS, Section 232 and existing Section 301 TARIFFS, remain in place, and in full force and effect. Today I will sign an Order to impose a 10% GLOBAL TARIFF, under Section 122, over and above our normal TARIFFS already being charged, and we are also initiating several Section 301 and other Investigations to protect our Country from unfair Trading practices. Thank you for your attention to this matter. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP

The trials of our Donald J Trump remind me of the sufferings of Christ. He was humiliated by his enemies. A Judas Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society got Gorsuch and ACB nominated and went on to the sue US on tariffs. Our enemies tried twice to kill Trump and tried to imprison him for hundreds of years. Yet here he stands. Remember in November.
Job.
The wonderful and interesting thing about Job is that the Lord restored the lives of the young people who died when the roof caved in on them – when that had happened, Job was already at a pretty low point but then that was the very worst thing of all of the things that happened.
Well, not restore, rather the LORD gave Job seven new sons and three new daughters
Dear Jim,
As I understand it, the LORD did not restore his wife to him. He restored his sons and daughters. As in resurrection. As in that is what is going to happen to the sons and daughters in the coming time when those who believe in the risen Jesus Christ will be restored to Him, even if they are dead.
What a tremendous thing to give hope and joy.
Our Job just wants to create jobs.
Interesting read on getting a SC ruling on IEEPA Tariffs reference used by Obama and his planeload of cash to Iran. Still digesting that analysis, but, if true, it again speaks to the maneuvering used by PDJT and team to limit future Presidential abuses.
(1) Supreme Court Ruling On Tariffs – Joe Lange
caution Q drops within
🙏
It was the Gorsuch nomination that enabled McConnell to nuke the filibuster for SCOTUS nominees. Gorsuch was centrist enough that the Dems had no argument against him, except for “we don’t want Trump to get SCOTUS picks.” The Dems’ extreme position was enough for Collins and Murkowski to vote to nuke the filibuster, which enabled Kavanaugh and ACB to get through.
While ACB has been a disappointment, she certainly is a vast improvement over RBG. Trump had to pick someone who could get through the confirmation fast, and get 51 votes before the 2020 election. A vacancy would have allowed Biden to make this pick as well as the Breyer replacement.
With such a small majority in the Senate, Trump has had to choose nominees who are “confirmable.” A larger majority would mean that the votes of the likes of Collins or Murkowski wouldn’t matter.
Trump has parted ways with the Federalist Society, BTW.
And yes, in November, or in your GOP senate primary, if you have one, do remember the need for a larger, more conservative Senate majority.
Yes, they were compromise nominees, and certainly not Alito-Thomas conservatives, but in cases like Dobbs, Roper-Bright (struck down Chevron), and US v. Trump (presidential immunity), they have voted conservative.
Good reminder.
Thanks.
A voice of reason
With all due respect…seriously? This raising up of Trump to God like status is unhealthy and needs to stop. And I voted for guy three times.
We can only hope that the court redeems itself with the Birthright citizenship case….
Wish in one hand…
My Mom’s favorite saying.
Yeah, no. I’m not holding my breath on that one. You know Robert’s will get a phone call telling him how to vote on that one by the DS. I just wonder what they’ve got on ACB. Maybe they don’t have anything, they’ll just threatened to harm her children.
Maybe ACB is just one of them.
SDOII
As Robert Barnes told us, she is, above all, an institutionalist.
His office is filled with Leftists well positioned for years.
I doubt it; I am wishing for the best but I think Roberts will interpret the Constitution in the Democrats favor
I think that if the Supreme Court is a stickler for wording, birthright citizenship should be gone.
I’d kike to think that would be the case, but Roberts decision on Obama care says otherwise.
No sense in letting any inconvenience go to waste by not making money on it.
Why is this guy smiling? The superemes and sketchy tariffs are a money making machine!
https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/friday-news-briefs
It doesn’t matter which party is in power…….you can always be confident that you will get war and grift!
Ya, MAGA!!!!!!!
Nope.
Shades of Pelosi insider trading. Or maybe Omar.
“Companies take the quick cash rather than wait years for the legal process”
So the companies analyze the situation and make their own decision. Are we supposed to feel bad for Amazon? You do realize they have corporate lawyers who review and sign off on any deal. Also, we’re not in any war.
It’s trading on inside information!
No it is not. They purchased the rights to a potential claim. There was no trading at all. The corporation was not forced to sell its rights to any claim. It chose to do so. Corporations make decisions on whether to pursue a claim over years or take a settlement all the time.
Earlier a commenter described it as hedging.
Its more like a settlement. You can have X now or you can wait three years and get Y and there is a chance Y could ultimately turn out to be worth nothing.
MAGA. Endless loyalty, zero reflection. How does this benefit the main street????????
Tariffs, War on the High Seas, Kidnapping, Russia BAD-Ukraine/AZOV Forever, Zionist Insanity Forever, Regime Change, Bombs Away, Greenland-Grab…….yada, yada, yada…….Oh and lets not forget Epstein or Aliens (the outer space kind, and the ones crossing borders and now IN the homeland)………………eventually, MAGA will agree/defend the use of tactical nuclear weapons to “protect our Zionist allies”. An open nuclear exchange will eventually quiet things down………eventually, but no one will be around to hear the sound of silence.
Endless loyalty with zero reflection with willing blindness to the real world IS INSANITY!
This Cantor Fitzgerald slight of hand is a perfect example of transferring money to friends, while producing NOTHING for ordinary Americans. Pure financialization – create nothing of value for Americans or the world, just money changing hands to the current friends-in-power.
Sure, technically legal? Likely? Ethical – dubious at best! Make-A-Great-Again?, NO, unless you are part of the Lutnick family.
Again, these financial scams CREATE NOTHING OF VALUE FOR AMERICANS!
MAGA. Endless loyalty, zero reflection.
Transferring money to friends? What if the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of tariffs? That would have been a loss for Lutnick and he is in the business of speculation. That was his career.
We have had endless grift from the Clinton Foundation, the Obama’s, the Biden Family and their ties to China. Presient trump does not even take a salary.
Trump thinks outside the box because he is trying to MAGA. Greenland is strategically important to our defense. Release the Alien files? Finally! I think we can handle the information.
Epstein is a Democrat Party donor problem and a problem in the UK. Let’s not forget that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar a Lago and aided police in his prosecution.
You have TDS.
MAGA isn’t envious of other people or corporations. Yes, MAGA does have endless loyalty for those who have shown their loyalty to us. You, obviously, don’t have any loyalty at all. Which makes you very similar to DeSantis whom I’m sure is the reason you’re here.
Trump is improving the economy more than any of your Sea Island candidates would. You’re alleging insider trading. Who on the Court told Cantor Fitzgerald what the decision would be? If they didn’t know what the court would decide then there’s no insider trading. Reading the tea leaves is not insider trading. You’re a typical retarded Doomer. Your lies won’t work here.
So, was the ‘bet’ on a SURE THING? Did Cantor know the SC’s decision in advance? If so then that would be unadulterated insider trading. If not, then it was a speculative ‘bet’ based on the OPINIONS of those involved for a ruling not yet known and for monies which may or may not be returned if that ruling went the wrong way. Cantor may ‘win’ big or possibly lose ‘big’. But you’ll be unhappy either way, right?
Lutnick did not know how the Court would rule.
Fake news:—-https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cantor-fitzgerald-slammed-over-tariff-trades-which-never-happened
As Commerce Secretary, Lutnick has direct visibility into the government’s legal strategy, how their lawyers rate their odds, and what arguments they’ll make.
Lmao. The government’s legal strategy and arguments were set forth in their legal briefs that were available for anyone to read right on the Supreme Court website.
Refunds (if any) will be tied up in courts for years.
Nice try, troll. Please remove your tinfoil hat.
Untrue!
Personally, I doubt your story is true.
If it is, then companies who paid tariffs would be crazy not to tell the government to give them credit from those tariffs against the new tariffs.
Cantor never bought up any of these tariff refund rights. Yes, there was a salesperson that recommended they do so, but they declined to do so. As a result, Cantor lost out on this opportunity.
Not true. Cantor Fitzgerald took no positions on the refunds.
This is typical anti-Maga propaganda. Don’t fall for it.
Alas, ‘fake news’:
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/cantor-fitzgerald-slammed-over-tariff-trades-which-never-happened
The TDA is fully embeded in those black robes that never seem to consider the LAWS, only their ‘feelings’.
If that’s an update to Trump Derangement Addiction, it’s a good acronym to describe the people who initially caught the Syndrome but are now incurable.
This was so apparent that the Administration was prepared for this ruling either way. Change nothing if it goes your way or be ready with steps B, C, & D if it doesn’t. Nothing to prepare for or strategize about if it goes your way so nothing to spend time on, rather the Administration has spent the last several months preparing to hit the ground running if the ruling went the other direction.
I believe the press conference was a required step in that strategy in order to signal to International Leaders that nothing is realistically going to change. it’s was also potentially needed to provide SCOTUS some cover for future rulings to illustrate that they are “not in the tank for PDJT”. While this was a significant ruling, it wasn’t a “blow” to the Administration’ posture or function, as media outlets would have everyone believe. There are far more significant rulings that are set to come out & I don’t think it was a coincidence that SCOTUS elected to release this ruling first. “Birthright Citizenship” is still yet to be released. Let’s see how that one goes? If it gets ruled on & goes in the direction of POTUS, it will probably be released post the SOTU address?
Either way nothing changes, now instead of the convenience of paying at the pump we have to walk into the station & pay at the counter. Moving on.
USSC had to ‘throw’ the case so they can rule against anchor babies. Fingers crossed.
Maybe so. That’s what this writer thins about tariffs and birthright citizenship and redistricting.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/tariff-turnabout-saturday-february?publication_id=463409&post_id=188725668&isFreemail=true&r=ck852&triedRedirect=true
So the fools and foreign influence remarks are hyperbole and they are all in on it.
Go ahead a strike it down. I’ll call you traitors. Then we kick out the birthers and go for some burritos and beer!
Haha, not insinuating it was that streamlined a process that you outlined or even that there’s been ANY coordination between POTUS & SCOTUS, simply remarking that it’s part of the Swamp Playbook…
Also, while it would be highly unethical to believe there’s any coordination between the two branches, it’s not hard to imagine some mid-level staffer(s) from both sides having back channel access to each other with a wink, nod or a smile to let the other side know what’s happening upstream of the rulings. Nobody in Washington is or likes to be surprised. They all know what’s going on & act surprised & shocked in order to maintain the Kabuki theatrics.
If you knew what you were talking about,you would not repeat that left wing dribble.we are not paying either place.
Educate yourself then get back to me!
God, why don’t you idiots just stick to X.
God bless President Trump! 🙏🦁 👑
Such a warrior! 🪖
He just keeps dodging those arrows! 🛡️
❤️🤍💙
I agree. If the Supremes’ don’t like him using that Emergency Act, well these are other laws President Trump and his team
keeps on dodging the arrows, and delivering their own punches.
Its a great time to be alive and bear witness to the Universe unfolding the way that it is. God Bless Donald J. Trump! He is surely doing his best to make America Great Again in so many ways!
If you read Kavanaugh’s dissent, he practically gives the President a road map to other federal laws that would authorize Trump to order tariffs. Hint, hint, hint…although I expect the White House attorneys were already scouring the United States code for such laws during the past months.
Well i guess i wont be getting those texts asking me info so i can get a tartiff check from trump now.
I would bet that prior to the election a lot of planning occurred.
Being persecuted via Lawfare offers a great education against the nation’s internal enemies.
Being a planner / developer Trump’s process would most likely move from a single “how do we get there legally” to how do we legally back this up….how many other legal ways to accomplish the mission?
I am not surprised that Trump was ready with..”.no worries, we have these other authorities. Thanks for additional suggestions.”
Perhaps the IEEPA was chosen as this vehicle for this very reason?
While that is true, Scott Bessent and Lutnick already had those sections figured out as backup plans.
The main reason these were not used from the outset, is that those sections take longer to put in place.
I still give Kudos to Kavanaugh for pointing it out.
I wonder how long it will take the moonbats to figure out that their “win” will be very short lived.
Aaand…I am still not tired of winning!
I always come back to this .
JB. Williams
According to democrat politicians, judges, lawyers, and the news media, “there was no election fraud in 2020.” This claim is made entirely on the basis that no court in the country has agreed to review any evidence of the fraud in their courtrooms. Every court has taken the Sergeant Shultz “I see nothing, I hear nothing, I know nothing” position, as if ignoring the evidence somehow discredits the evidence, or makes it vanish.
What the courts have actually done is deny due process of law on the most critical case of political corruption in our 244-years. They have violated their oaths, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and every legal American and in so doing, they have all but guaranteed the total collapse of the USA.
The courts, all the way to and including the U.S. Supreme Court, have eliminated themselves from the equation. They are no longer a legitimate active part of our constitutional form of government. They have removed themselves from the process of justice and placed justice in the hands of the American people. The Article III branch of the Federal government (the Judiciary) no longer holds any constitutional authority over anything! They have totally abdicated any lawful authority over anything at this point.
And the implications of this? And what does that give We the People or any segment of the population a right to do to remedy this wrong? When can we start? What plans to you have to take advantage of this opportunity?
There was a recent decision that gives standing to many who were denied it in 2020.
Changes the battlefield.
We are so fortunate to have DJT as our president and leader.
❤️🤍💙🦁👑🇺🇸
Tarriffs are one way to encourage American re-industrialization. (Destroying the dollar’s reserve currency status is another.)
No president has even made the slightest attempt to re-industrialize the US before Trump. Not one.
This must be that decision Roberts was saying he didn’t want leaked a while back – couple weeks ago.
Not so sure, birthright citizenship / anchor-baby ruling will be the one with the greatest consequence. Tarriffs are still on solid footing with today’s ruling of little to no consequence.
Just pulled in from Texas. I’ll have to look at this tomorrow, after Caturday viewing.
Sheesh……
Maybe don’t embarrass them before they rule on the anchor baby case?
If we lose that case that’s all she wrote. We get 50M grifters in a millisecond.
Remember , CONGRESS can fix this. Just pass a law that includes tariffs in the language of the previous law.
The truth is that winning with tariffs while removing foreign labor competition inside the U.S. are two cornerstones for ushering in a new American renaissance for U.S. citizen workers not seen since the end of WWII.
But the legislative grifters will never oppose the corporatists, the wealthy elitists who hold most of America’s stock, and foreign interests that contribute to their campaign funds, give them stock tips, and provide revolving door opportunities.
The majority of both houses of congress, and both political parties, could not be trusted to spell tariffs correctly let alone tell you what they are and how they are being used by the President to promote the interests of our country.
One of our founders, maybe it was Benjamin Franklin, maybe one of the others, stated that the future of the American republic depends upon a moral and educated citizenry. Well, leaving morals aside, we certainly are not an educated citizenry and that goes double for the members of congress.
For those of you who you proclaiming how this court ruling is a victory for Americans, I’d like an explanation on why you would want to turn this all over to the likes of AOC, Ilhan Omar, Nancy Mace, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Rand Paul, Thomas Massie, the departed MTG, Lindsey Graham or countless others.
What a pathetically unserious bunch. Nancy Mace never pronounces on any subject without a proclamation on her personal sex life, al of the democrats would eliminate all tariffs today simply because they hate Trump. Lindsey Graham would have to travel to Israel to get directions from Netanyahu on how to proceed, and the Kentucky delegation in both houses and both parties would need to check with their donors. And lastly, there’s the GOPe, as exemplified by Mike Pence who proclaims this a great day as it returns free trade amongst free nations.
Let’s all go read another Andy Hardy book. For goodness sake
It was John Adams and he said the Constitution was for a moral and religious people and that it was wholly inadequate for any other people. Back then they just expected that people would continue to be as well educated as they were. But the point is the same. We are no longer a moral and religious people and thus the Constitution and our elected representatives no longer work for the benefit of the people.
AOC is such an ignoramus she may think tariffs are a form of racism, if not a new type of cocktail that’s come out since she used to tend bar in Manhattan.
Or as Louisiana Senator Kennedy stated this evening “Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez announced categorically today that she is not a moron, and she went on to say she hasn’t even been to Utah, much less embraced their religion!”.
Nice one, Sunne.
or rush out and buy some silver.
The dissenting opinions of thomas & kavanaugh say it all…. illogical and egregious overreach in the 6-3 ruling. I agree w The President’s statement that the 6-3 ruling was made by foreign influence. The money changers are domestic and foreign, all evil. Roberts know he’s untouchable and above the law in all things judicial and political…
Untouchable … Except for God, and on that day when he stands before the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, and Jesus shows him all the sins of his life, not as Robert’s might recall them, but as the sinless Savior sees them, through His eyes …
Roberts will throw himself to the ground, weeping in shame, fear , & self-loathing, his soul stripped, his life consigned to hell forever, begging for mercy. Sold his birthright for a mess of unimportant, rotten stuff.
Jesse Waters….
Fabulous!
I love you President Trump. The Court is Supremely Wrong in this case. And all of us Americans with a Sane mind know it !
Thank you sir for all you are doing to make America Best Again ❣️
Alan Dershowitz says Trump’s legal team blew the tariff ruling by making an economic argument instead of a legal argument. He feels a winning legal argument could have been made.
By “Trump’s legal team” do you mean the US Department of Justice? Dershowitz will say anything to get on TV. The lawyers made all the appropriate arguments. The court is corrupt and incompetent and actually has one judge who cannot even define the word woman. You should read the legal briefs rather than relying on paid TV “experts”.
Correct. Dersh is a butthead
Did he have his underpants on while he said it
The Solicitor General’s office represents the US in SCOTUS. Its overall win rate is impressive during this administration (SG is appointed by the president).
EZ, it wouldn’t have mattered what argument was presented; the verdict would have been the same.
Our wonderful President – God bless you, President Trump!
Thank you, Sundance!
Many politicians, Democrat and Republican, are owned by globalists. So are many on the Supreme Court, especially the Jesuit and the Chief cuckold. Whence the economy collapses and violence consumes everything, these charlatans will not be immune. These are wicked people.
This is called the Supreme ability of a President to Kick Azz and Take Names. Have a Nice Day!
Will they ever learn ,
FAFO !
I don’t want to hear any more crap from the Left that the SCOTUS is compromised to the Right, that the SCOTUS is illegitimate, etc. when the next ruling goes against the Left.
My President!!
He led with his best offer: IEEPA tariffs. SCOTUS pissed him off, and now he’s going nuclear. He also established that SCOTUS (and the federal judiciary) is as compromised as Congress. Roberts “suddenly” changed his mind on Obamacare at the last minute, handing the globalists a 5-4 victory. And now this mess of a decision about tariffs.
I am convinced that Roberts has been legally compromised. Notice that Trump stated: “It is my opinion that the Court has been swayed by Foreign Interests, . . .” using a lawyer’s gloss “it is my opinion” to minimize charges of defamation. But I think we will see shortly how filthy the exalted SCOTUS is.
My dream? During the State of the Union address in a few days, Trump enters the room, goes to the podium, and the first thing he says is: “Please stay seated. Federal marshals are outside the chamber and will be entering to issues warrants for the arrest of many members of Congress and SCOTUS for crimes and corrupt acts”. Well, it’s a dream, anyway . . .
Keep the faith, everyone! The fact that Trump and Bessent and Vance were so well-prepared on a moment’s notice to rebuke SCOTUS and move forward with even more onerous tariffs means they had planned this contingency.
AMAZING. Trust Trump. He’s just getting started.
Zurich Mike
i would LOVE that!
Domestic interest too, through knowledge of foreign held collateral.
Dear sir! That’s a lovely dream bringing a smile to light! Sure do miss those Tom Clancy novel moments, where truth is stranger than fiction! “ we have it all…”
Correction: SCROTUS. There, FIFY.
My President! They thought they could take away one of his favorite word from his arsenal. He is even more determined and I trust and love him for everything he does for this country.
Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸
@Tablesalt13
🚨Here is a list of all of the investigations Trump had underway BEFORE his IEEPA tariffs got stuck down
these investigations are REQUIRED to switch the tariffs to S.232 tariffs
HE WAS READY AND PREPARED!
Cont….
This President doesn’t stop at a mere Plan B.
Behold Plans A through Z!
https://x.com/Tablesalt13/status/2024872583800160666
John E Deaton
@JohnEDeaton1
SCOTUS TAKEAWAY –
The Hidden Victory
The MOST IMPORTANT takeaway – for me – from today’s SCOTUS decision on the Trump Tariffs has nothing to do with trade – it’s about precedent.
During oral argument – Justice Gorsuch asked the administration’s lawyer an extremely important question.
He cornered the administration and simply asked: If the Court upholds these tariffs, can a future President unilaterally declare a “CLIMATE EMERGENCY” to bypass Congress and impose their own agenda?
The administration’s lawyer was forced to reluctantly agree and say, “yes.”
Cont…
Howard Lutnick may be doing a fine job for President Trump but he’s also a big fat liar.
In what sense?
Fake News!
My president doesn’t even let male patriots kiss him. On the other hand, Obama……
This energy and focus so rightly applied to our economic challenges should also be directed against the socialist/communist/Islamic traitors who have weaved their ways into our local/state/ federal governments. If we don’t begin to hold those accountable -at the high test levels – for stealing from the treasury, selling out our critical national advantages and interests, and thwarting our vital elections, than it won’t matter how much money is in our treasury or how positive our trade accounts are. No accountability, no country.
Okay now that the tariff issue has been put to bed (4 now)
PASS THE SAVE ACT !
It is beginning to look like we are going to have to put McConnell in his eternal bed before that happens.
Of course, the senate could get off of their compromised butt and change some rules to get it done.
It is a body blow, but it was reassuring to hear Trump say that he’s already got some other irons in the fire. The globalists will not win!
It is a swing and a miss, but the counter punch lands solid.
I’m sorry, on this one, I wish the President played this differently and he could’ve. He didn’t need to blast the court. It has become clear with section 201 and 322, I believe, that Cavanaugh gave him a back door to do whatever he needed. Scott Bessent gave a minute and a half yesterday about how he didn’t even change his speech regardless of the Supreme Court decision. They, yes, the President had a plan. Gorsuch’s question was right and using the climate was right on especially with what the President has done to undo their crap.
I continue to not see the need for him to continue bashing a court that has agreed with him, what , 22 out of 26 times? OK, go ahead and disagree if you must. I just thought this was totally unnecessary.
Why wouldn’t the POTUS make a statement?
Au Contraire, Mi Amigo. I suspect DJT’s response was long planned and was strategically made for effect. It played very well.
On this ruling, our FATHER has a better plan. Just like the election of 2020…
May The LORD continue HIS Plan and Purpose for/with President Trump! Amen and AMEN
Once again it was politically stupid to attack the court over a meaningless ruling. The President will need the goodwill in upcoming cases like the birthright case and tweaking their noses publicly will not help him in any way. It was obvious that he had many other tariff options open as he announced and he simply could have have went with that approach but he always has to go with personal attacks. It makes him look petty and vindictive.
Yay the Concern Trolls are here!
🤣🤣🤣🤣
What good will? There’s naught to be favoritism, rather facts and logic and constitutional merit—I thought justice is (presumed) blind.
I disagree.
I love my President!
Our country has been infiltrated all the way up to the Supreme Court….and they are compromised including and specifically Roberts!
This has been out there for years.
Goes all the way back to Obamacare…..to why and how Chief Justice Roberts bent over backwards to ensure Obama’s unconstitutional law was enacted!
Unbelievable to me that there are still so many that do not really understand the moment we are in.
Although….I do believe that what’s coming……ought to open a few more eyes!
And Nothing Can Stop It!
I am sure everyone sees mitch and the senate retaliation by refusing to vote on the save act.
IMO Learning Resources have won a pyrrhic victory. The Supreme Court will rule that the money must be paid back, but task Congress with working out the details (SCOTUS has neither the resources, the time, nor the expertise to figure that out). Congress will eventually decide to approve Trump’s tariffs ex post facto, Their other option would be to try to find the money in the budget which a divided Congress would not be able to do.
The ruling was goofy, but POTUS will use sections 232 and 301 to recover most of this “loss”.
The challenge is that both of these require more time to implement.
IIRC, section 232 requires 270 days of process by the Commerce dept. Hopefully much of these processes have already been happening for some time.
Actually seeing posts that the 270 day review process started on day one of the Trump admin!
Amen Sir 🫡 Thank you President Trump!
TRUMP NAMED THEM: The Real “Foreign Interests”
Susan Kokinda argues Trump’s response to the Supreme Court tariff ruling points beyond China to “foreign interests” tied to the British Empire’s Adam Smith free-trade ideology, defended by the US Chamber of Commerce and Cato Institute. She cites Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Ambassador Jamieson Greer framing the administration’s approach as Hamiltonian economic sovereignty, and says tariffs will continue under other laws, including a new 10% global tariff. She contrasts this with Thursday’s Board of Peace meeting, where 60 nations backed “peace through construction,” funding housing, security, and development, rejecting Kissinger-style managed conflict. She warns midterm demoralization risks ending Trump’s agenda.
“…our Supreme Court has reaffirmed that the Constitution grants Congress – not the President – the power to tax.”
I’m so confused. For Obamacare justice Roberts affirmed that the Constitution grants the Senate – not Congress – the power to tax.
“Affordability”
The Main thing that American Citizens want to KNOW, IS; What is MY Refund Amount%. AND WHEN DO I GET IT.!?!?!?
The Actual “Tariff Tax” was Paid: 100% by the USA IMPORTER in order to get the Items Thru US Customs.
Exporter Doesn’t Pay ANYTHING to USA… Only the Company Importing pays the “Tariff Tax”
The US Custom Dept. then Deposited that in USA Account.
Overseas Company DID NOT “Legally Pay” a Tax. Whatever arrangement the Exporter made with their Importer IS NOT USA GOVT PROBLEM.
As for REFUND; If the Importer can PROVE: that they Didn’t RAISE THEIR PRICE, and Pass the Tariff Tax on to Customers;
Then they are Entitled to Full Refund.
BUT, As NY FED “Insinuates”; 90% of the Cost was PASSED ON to the USA Citizens.!$!$!$
So, What Trump should Do Is…. (Accept the NY FED Statement){They will Probably Retract Their Findings, If Trump uses them to make Refund, according to my PLAN}
Here is the Plan;
ADD Up the Total “Take” on IEEPA…. REFUND that 90%; to EACH USA CITIZEN
{Divided Equally… ID Required for Pick UP at ICE OFFICES.!!!}
If the Importer Already Passed ON the Cost: Then it Would be “DOUBLE DIPPING” to Give it Back To The Importer.!!!
They already Made ONE Profit…. They are NOT Entitled to Another via Refund.!€!¥!£
And Again…. Exporter Gets NOTHING From US Govt.
Trump should announce this at the State of the Union…
And then “Sock it To Them” with the Tariffs that He Can Use.!!!