It is difficult not to notice the strategy of how certain Trump administration officials are targeted.
Any cabinet member that looks inward to reveal the status of corrupt activity within the information silo itself becomes a target. Cabinet officials who focus externally, meaning the majority of their effort looks outside government, are seemingly left alone.
HHS Secretary RFK Jr and Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, are examples of those receiving the worst ideological targeting from operations within HHS and the Intelligence Community respectively.
Conversely, CIA Director John Ratcliffe faces almost no scrutiny or targeting by the Intelligence Community as the silo operators frame narratives almost exclusively against DNI Gabbard.
The latest effort surfaces as embeds within Main Justice and the CIA frame a storyline that Tulsi Gabbard’s action in removing the security clearances of 37 current and former officials, has now resulted in those same officials being incapable of testifying against former CIA Director John Brennan (and others).
The premise of the narrative is ridiculous. If we are to accept some current or former IC officials are willing to testify against Brennan (or others), regardless of whether Tulsi Gabbard has revoked their security clearances, their retroactive knowledge is still pertinent. They are completely free to give statements and testimony based on their prior conduct.
What the leakers to Axios and the New York Times are trying to establish, is groundwork for the removal of Tulsi Gabbard. This stops her objective of investigating internal corruption. I suspect most of the people trying desperately to undermine Gabbard are from within the CIA Directorate of Analysis, or at least in alignment with the directorate’s agenda.
The narrative’s author, Marc Caputo, claims AG Pam Bondi is hampered in her effort to criminally indict John Brennan because the witnesses Main Justice would use have lost their security clearances. Again, the game of leveraging internecine friendships in/around the office of Trump becomes an overlay.
It is certainly true that AG Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have refused to look internally; and it is also true that DNI Tulsi Gabbard has spent much of her focus time looking internally. Bondi and Patel continue the preferred game of institutional blame-casting in Main Justice. Meanwhile, Gabbard is busy focused on cleaning up her IC house.
The Fourth Branch embeds do not fear the approach of Bondi/Patel, but the Fourth Branch embeds are petrified by the approach of Tulsi Gabbard. That reality underpins the baseline of opposition against the Director of National Intelligence.
As the dynamic unfolds, CIA Director John Ratcliffe is certainly not corrupt; however, nor is he brave. Director Ratcliffe is willing to let Director Gabbard clean up his house, and then he takes credit for the reform. As the weeks unfold into months, this is becoming increasingly obvious.
Mark Zaid is the current anti-Trump Lawfare operative likely seeding the narrative to Axios/New York Times.
Mark Zaid, a Trump administration critic who represents six of the intelligence professionals whose clearances were revoked, said administration officials fretting about the Brennan case have “valid concerns.”
“This seems to be, as usual, an unforced error by Trump administration officials who don’t think things through in the long game in favor of a quick-pass completion,” he said. “If I were the defense counsel [for Brennan], I would raise the revocation in an attempt to undermine the credibility of the witnesses.” (more)
Mark Zaid knows the game-changing process that DNI Tulsi Gabbard is using.
Gabbard is directly going into each IC agency to review and retrieve information. When she finds something that connects to the overall plots being used by the Fourth Branch, the DNI takes that information directly to President Trump who subsequently declassifies it and then she releases it.
Zaid and the Deep State operatives he represents, want to stop Tulsi Gabbard with urgency. They are throwing every available IC narrative into the media flow in the hope that something stops Tulsi’s effectiveness.
The fourth branch of our government must be broken, burned with fire and the ashes stirred so that no embers remain.
And we do This how?
Prayer war is ongoing, join in.
Sunlight is disinfecting the DC swamp more and more each day. Sundance and this site is I believe a source of encouragement to Director Gabbard.
How? By all of us being Andrew Breitbart/ Charlie Kirk within our social circles. Be tenacious about refuting the lies that friends and family members are being told by the MSM and leftist sources. Never give up. Speak the truth with compassion to the best of your ability. Sundance is providing us with the ammunition to counter the lies. The Evil One attempts to wear us down and discourage us, keep fighting.
This.
If the claim that the revoking of their security clearance in no way affects their ability to testify on past events (when they had security clearance) of what use is this claim if it is simply ignored, and their testimony demanded?
The way I read that article is, he’s suggesting that because their clearances were revoked, it makes them look like flawed witnesses to any jury.
But that’s just my take.
Hum? “embeds within Main Justice and the CIA frame a storyline that Tulsi Gabbard’s action in removing the security clearances of 37 current and former officials, has now resulted in those same officials being incapable of testifying against former CIA Director John Brennan (and others).”
I should read the link, as “incapable” is different then tainted. And of course it is not tainted, they are not active and so on a need to know basis, the no longer need security clearances as they no longer need to know.
“This seems to be, as usual, an unforced error by Trump administration officials who don’t think things through in the long game in favor of a quick-pass completion,” he said. “If I were the defense counsel [for Brennan], I would raise the revocation in an attempt to undermine the credibility of the witnesses.” (more)
Well I see and thank you. However it appears to be weak tea to me for the reasons stated, and leaving those yahoos with a security clearance makes no sense to me.
Absolutely agree. Very weak arguement. Criminals rat on other criminals all the time!!
Weak argument but great for clucks and gaslighting.
It’s the public opinion battle; IDK, maybe I’m off here, but, to me the comments on X are trending in a direction that is removing the teeth of these operations. As long as the Trump Admin isn’t serving up pudding- the 4th branchers have nothing.
Yes, it also implies that these are the only people who are able to testify against him which I find humorous.
They worked for him too in his processes.
Does anybody really think those whose clearances were revoked were going to be detrimental witnesses for Brennan? It’s the prosecuting attorneys who will make hay of their revoked clearances.
According to Axios’ leakers anyway.
Who cares? Having them appear as liars is a benefit to this process.
Well Brennan’s was revoked too so… his testimony is no better than theirs.
Which is all BS, IMHO.
Somewhere there has to be a 4th Branch version of a “Sammy The Bull” Gravano; a top former insider and confidante of the big bosses who turns State’s Evidence and testifies in explicit detail about all their many crimes he was personally witness to.
I hope it’s Reid Hoffman and he gets Linked In to everyone else going to prison.
A/k/a unindicted co-conspirators.
Or, reinstate their security clearances temporarily to testify?
It looks like anyone who is called to testify now , that doesn’t have a security clearance is golden !!!
It seems that simple anyway.
No
No! Once you no longer work for the govt you no longer need security clearance. You should lose your clearance as soon as you walk out the door on your last day. By now shouldn’t everything they know be declassified, over with, or out in the open anyway?
I say we start a GiveSendGo to send every employee of the FedGov their very own Pocket Constitution With The Bill Of Rights.
I carry mine every day. Maybe they should carry theirs around, and before they make any decisions, they can can scan the Instructions from The Founding Fathers to make sure that what’s being done comports with The Mission Statement.
Plus there are a few stickler clauses about what happens when these people don’t do their jobs, that seem to have been overlooked as of late.
If these people loved this Republic it wouldn’t be this difficult.
“If you ain’t helping US, you are hurting US”
A Massive and ruthless purge relentlessly pursued. That is how. Someone with the ruthlessness of a Joseph Stalin without the murder, the gulag, or torture. But just as unrelenting and ruthless in pursuit. Neither Bondi nor Patel have it. Or, at least, they have not demonstrated it so far. Sad to say, but I question whether Trump would demonstrate the requiste ruthlessness.
A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week.
-George S. Patton
As Ms Gabbard is doing, even through massive resistance and media gaslighting.
Bow before the King of Kings first and foremost. Recognizing Jesus for who he is empowers us to see ourselves and our own lives more clearly.
Exalting Jesus over all other thrones and powers displaces other powers.(This is foundationally a spiritual war) It also positions us to understand our personal and corporate marching orders.
Be a good dad, run for school board or city council, keep being faithful in your marriage. In so many ways, it is way less complicated than we make it.
Jesus is Lord. Start there.
Slowly, patiently, and completely. To move too fast is to fail.
Church Committee 2.0
Maybe I’m missing something but I don’t remember our founding fathers saying anything about a “CIA.” Why can’t the President do away with the entire cabal?
“And we do This how?”
An enormous task, no doubt. Sorta like trying to eat an elephant.
And how do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.
Keep chewing away at the deep state. It takes time, but eventually it will be consumed.
…then salt the earth after.
There can be no Phoenix this time.
Precisley. Make it like Carthage.
Indeed Betsy.
Remember Christ and the fig tree?
In the morning, as they went along, they saw the fig tree withered from the roots. 21 Peter remembered and said to Jesus, “Rabbi, look! The fig tree you cursed has withered!”
22 “Have faith in God,” Jesus answered. 23 “Truly[d] I tell you, if anyone says to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and does not doubt in their heart but believes that what they say will happen, it will be done for them. 24 Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours. 25 And when you stand praying, if you hold anything against anyone, forgive them, so that your Father in heaven may forgive you your sins.”
I do remember it, Monti.
I especially appreciate this Scripture this morning for personal reasons, dearest friend.
And I thank you for it.
You are Welcome
Buried face-down with a wooden stake through the heart and a brick in its mouth.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
Root and branch and salted! That should fix it……
Earth salted. Amen
“The fourth branch of government”, .A.K.A., “The Blob”
Salt the earth around it so it remains barren for millennia.
In a phrase, we have too many “intelligence agencies,” who * …are…not…intelligent!
It is high time to reinvent how our spying agencies are operated and to repopulate them with Constitutional patriots!
It is also high time to eliminate some of them!
* Yes, “who,” and not the impersonal “which,” since all parts of governments are run by people!
Using “which” to refer to government or its subdivisions is a grammatical mistake removing responsibility from people by depersonalizing them.
Just totally eliminate them all!
Start with firing Marc Caputo.
reckoning Is coming Barack Hussein Obama and his minions and THAT is why the cockroaches are up in arms here.
Clearly, over the target.
Problem is that, so far the only guys taking flack are, Tulsi Gabbard ,Kennedy ,Tom Holman , Caroline Levittown and Trump.
Where is everyone else.
Exactly why Barry is putting himself out there to whip up his minions. Good for the quick response team to point out previous videos, actions, etc. to display his lies. Just go away Barry and Hiliary.
I love Tulsi.
Mo, Tulsi has a large group of satisfied followers. I love Tulsi too…bill
Isn’t there an outpost in Guiana, that needs Mark’s urgent attention
Just fire him. Downsizing and all.
The rats are afraid someone is going to do some Weasel moves. On a tangential note….how in the hell did the FBI keep secret they had 275 agents present at J6?
Well then Wray committed perjury also. The docket is going to be rather full soon.
Yes Wray sure did lie.. he was asked outright by Rep Clay Higgins…
And Higgins, doesn’t ask questions. He doesn’t already know the answer to; Christopher Wray knew this but lied anyway.
Truth isn’t in Wray’s vocabulary.
Wow I had not heard that. Can you share the source?
Yeah , no sh*t
I’m guessing many more than that. Give it time.
Apparently there are good actors in the FBI, from Zweohedge today…
?itok=6I0AfJD-
The FBI deployed nearly 300 plainclothes agents to the US Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 riot, in an effort that became so chaotic it caused an internal schism within the agency that led many rank-and-file at the bureau that core competencies had been lost to “wokeness,” and that employees had become “pawns in a political war,” according to an after-action report hidden from the public for over four years until it was obtained by Just the News.
Anonymous complaints were sent to the after-action team by scores of FBI agents and other personnel – many from the bureau’s premier Washington field office (WFO) – detailing how agents were sent into a dangerous situation without proper safety equipment or even the ability to identify themselves as armed officers to other police agencies.
Most common among the complaints was that under former directors Chris Wray and just-indicted James Comey, the bureau had become infected with political bias and liberal ideology that treated the Trump-supporting Jan. 6 protesters much differently from Black Lives Matter rioters from the summer of 2020.
I personally believe that Trump in his second term has hired excellent staff. Gabbard is unquestionably one such person. But, unlike Sundance, I also consider Bondi and Patel(!) to be excellent in their roles. Which are very different in the legal constraints that are applied to them.
Gabbard is not “directly Law Enforcement.” She is a custodian of information, and she is finding and releasing that information in order to prepare for subsequent criminal indictment and so forth. She is therefore very free to act – and “acting,” she is. But both Bondi and Patel are constrained by Fifth Amendment safeguards designed to protect the “presumed innocent.” They cannot(!), for example, tell you what they are doing until the Grand Jury acts.
The DC Attorney said it best in an interview: “The difference between you and me is that I don’t tell you what I’m doing. When I have a case, I will be very loud.” That’s what the Law says regarding people in that peculiar position.
“But, unlike Sundance, I also consider Bondi and Patel(!) to be excellent in their roles.“
Do Pam and Kash have someone posting in the comment section under an alias?
I can’t name one thing of significance Kash has done I his role. Can you?
Nor Bondi. The Justice Department is a huge disappointment.
Found lots of burn bags full of incriminating evidence that Tulsi used??
Mike Robinson provided his rationale for why he still supports Bondi/Patel. However, you obviously disagree.
Dissenting opinions is what makes this site so important to me.
Guess you didn’t see or read his testimony recently enumerating the many arrests, etc. in the past 7 months. Look it up.
Perhaps Mike. It is very difficult from outside to be certain. I have More confidence in Patel then in Bondi. I asked this above… “If the claim that the revoking of their security clearance in no way affects their ability to testify on past events (when they had security clearance) of what use is this claim if it is simply ignored, and their testimony demanded?”
However after years of stonewalling it is difficult to be patient. I know changing the culture of a company is very difficult. Changing the culture of a corrupt government actively resisting is a hundredfold more difficult. For instance, if Comey has a Biden judge, will the evidence even matter?
By the way, I wish they would not leak upcoming indictments. Just do it. To me it appears all the cases are one massive RICO corruption and sedition.
Thank you for sticking up for these two. I’m tired of the Bondi bashing. Trump likes her and has said several times she’s doing a good job. Patel seems timid, but I’m not going to bash him.
Oh ya, Trump said great things about Erdogan yesterday too … and VOZ a few days before that. Compared to Gabbard both have proven to be worthless and weak.
I dont post this as an accusation or with rude intent, so in I apologize if it comes across that way.
However
Are you aware she framed an innocent man in George Zimmerman, using a known false witness in Genteel (or however her name is spelled), claiming to be both his girlfriend and on the phone with him at the time of the attack?
That bondi deserves nothing. That Trump is either unaware or complicit makes me seriously scratch my head until I consider Susie Wiles. Those 2 will wreck T47 because ultimately the buck stops with him.
That GZ claim has been posted on this site several times…bill
SD himself has addressed it, if anyone is curious and wants to search archives
Just one – I want to correct myself. I believe Jeanteal was the real girlfriend and Dee Dee the fake one. I only went back about 5 pages, but there’s reams of evidence on this site
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2015/03/24/never-before-outlined-details-of-false-racially-constructed-case-against-george-zimmerman-while-zimmerman-gives-first-interview-since-doj-drops-civil-rights-charges/
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2014/07/23/do-you-remember-dee-dee-march-20th-2012-if-so-unaccompanied-alien-children-is-analogous/
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/?s=Dee+Dee
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/?s=Pam+Bondi+George+Zimmerman
Trump “likes” a lot of people. Doesn’t mean we have to like them too.
Thanks for that
Just a little bit from the Comey story which you my want to read………..
“Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are afraid of the organizations they lead. Their fear stems from a desire to be viewed as effective, and yet their ineffectiveness at correcting the problem is driven by their fear. Thus, the loop.”
“may”
I don’t measure success by somebody’s intent or how well they follow the process, or saying the right things, or what obstacles the needed to overcome, or how many hands they shake, or how many TV appearances they get. Nobody should get a pass just because they “tried hard.”
Success means results — concrete, measurable, delivery of results.
“Either do or do not, there is no try” said Yoda.
Gabbard is delivering. Bondi and Patel are not.
(That said, the IC is still there. No departments have been eliminated. Some clearances revoked and a handful fired. But the overall machine goes on. It still has covert funding and tentacles everywhere.)
Gabbard is rare in DC.
I hope she is armed and wears Kevlar. The Antifa foot soldiers love the roof sniper position, and they are happy to go on a Kamikaze mission. How can the people immobilized by fear be made to act?
Can we use X to ask them in a public forum? Do we hold up signs outside some fancy DC restaurant where they go and indulge themselves
Can ordinary citizens help them take those toddler steps ? Be kind and encouraging.
Help them find some inner strength.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Preference is that she does exactly what she is doing. Its better to clean house than kill one louse if it comes to that. Well done Tulsi.
“Meanwhile, Gabbard is busy focused on cleaning up her IC house.
The Fourth Branch embeds do not fear the approach of Bondi/Patel, but the Fourth Branch embeds are petrified by the approach of Tulsi Gabbard. That reality underpins the baseline of opposition against the Director of National Intelligence.”
Tulsi, if you see this….you’re doing a good job.
DRIVE ON!!!
God Bless Tulsi Gabbard, and please Lord keep her safe from harm.
I wonder if Dir. Ratcliffe has an ounce of self awareness relating to what a coward he really is?
I’m sure he does. Remember he was one of the few that saw everything unredacted in President Trump’s first term. He was a regular on Bartiromo’s show playing the tic-tok game. Then, when he was ODNI, he curled into the fetal position when 4th Branch (mainly CIA Director Haspel) stonewalled his requests.
I personally believe there are individuals working under certain PDJT appointees that are not seen but effectively working hard.
Agreed, you don’t fully expose your hand in a poker game.
Agree Chris, I believe all the actions by all of these appointees Bondi, Kash, etc., are the result of a deeper plan that can not be exposed to the public. Does anyone really think our President is going to explain his plan??? For heavens sake, this is WAR! It is way past politics, we are facing dire consequences and a loss of our nation as we know it and what our founding fathers fought and sacrificed for. Please pray for patience, it is a virtue and can be had with prayer!!
Yes!!!
Interestingly, I don’t think anyone under attack / being targeted by the deep state is at risk of losing Trump’s confidence.
If anything, those that aren’t targeted are more at risk of Trump’s ire … aka his recent post to Pam about no prosecutions of previous bad actors. Tulsi is safe RFK Jr. is safe. Thankfully!
Micheal Scott really sucks as a CIA Director..
I call him Brisco County Jr. You’re my age, you should remember the reference. That actor is a dead ringer for Ratcliffe.
I guess there are no “Office” fans around today. I had to look up Steve Carell’s characters name to make a joke that bombed.. better luck next time.. and yeah, you are right..
I thought you may have meant Michael Scarn. Michael Scott’s homemade movie character. But I wasn’t sure if you thought he looked like Steve Carell.
“THREAT LEVEL MIDNIGHT”
All I know is Steve Carell reminds me of Ratcliffe.. I gave up on network comedy long ago.. thanks for the assist..
God bless, Tulsi. She is doing all she can to inform the American people. It is up to us to decide (and act) on this information.
Gabbard is directly going into each IC agency to review and retrieve information. When she finds something that connects to the overall plots being used by the Fourth Branch, the DNI takes that information directly to President Trump who subsequently declassifies it and then she releases it.
“I love it when a plan comes together.” -J.K. Rowling/Robert Galbraith
Just a note: The current Dem candidate for Governor in Virginia, Spanberger, worked in the CIA Directorate of Analysis. In fact, she boast about it in campaign ads.
She worked in the domestic postal division. Just some low level flunky. And she is a complete moron, see her covid mask contraption.
Yes, but, my BIL/SIL live in Leesburg and that place has thousands of Spanbergers. Thousands.
Several former CIA connected/employees have been running for office in the recent past. Deliberate?
BTW, it’s been all over conservative news about Spanberger’s cheating scandal while at West Point…was shut out of graduating ceremonies because of it. Funny how that’s not been in network news.
I think you are confusing Spanberger with Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ, candidate for governor) who was barred from Naval Academy graduation amid a cheating scandal.
So many democrats. So many ethics violations.
Our government corruption is getting old. Wish someone would end this shit. I’m really tired of nothing being done to end it.
If we don’t fall into the totalitarian abyss Tulsi will go down as one of the great American patriots.
Rat won’t even be a footnote.
Pray for protection.
Basically the two onetime Democrat members of Trumps Team are the ones who’s are most carrying out Trumps objectives.
That tells us everything we need to know.
The apparatus of the Republican Party is either ,corrupt, incapable , inept or unwilling to carry out the promise to clean house.
I say all of the above.
In this order
CORRUPT
INEPT
UNWILLING
INCAPABLE.
I fear that we Treepers have to prepare for the fact once Trumps term ends not only will progress being made but the Republican establishment will instantly enable the Democrats to undo everything he has accomplished.
Just look at the judicial system ongoing corruption.
Crickets from the corrupted bum named John Roberts.
How was he able to adopt two kids froM Ireland when they don’t allow children to be trafficked out of the
country ?
Yes I use that word trafficked on pourpose.
Sorry guys . I tried to edit but I couldn’t.
Meant to say , progress being made will end but
It is the cost of being a hero. So far, not many heroes have emerged in the Trump administration. Gabbard and Kennedy are true heroes as predicted by Strauss and Howe. Let’s hope that more heroes emerge.
I think it’s because they are very vocal about what they are doing . Because they can be be . There are others getting things done that aren’t vocal. Because they can’t be .
I’m gonna take it on faith that things are getting done even if we don’t see it .
I had faith that the hardest part about all this happened . President Trump got elected .
There are thousands and thousands of major issues that have to be dealt with .
I think we all have our little pet issues that we stomp our feet about , release the Epstien files. Put Hillary in jail etc etc .
Take for example how much good came from stopping the USAID money .
We were all looking at other things when that was being taken care of .
” I want it now ” culture comes out in all of us once in awhile .
I’m not beating up on you in particular Professor !!! Sorry !!!
Thank you, Jeff….well said!
Let’s PRAY that more (of God’s) heroes emerge!
I consider Stephen Miller a hero.
So the Deep State lawyers know their clients are corrupt, but they’re holding the “they don’t have clearances anymore so they can’t testify” over Director Gabbard’s head? Lol
Director Gabbard: Keep cleaning house, and let the chips fall where they may.
It is MORE important to get these creatures out of government. Let the Dufus-looking-stupid-grin Radcliffe keep pretending that he’s relevant.
Removing their security clearances should make it even easier for them to testify, not vice versa.
Get the pitchforks.
–€
Agree. And why would these folks make or break the prosecution?
I had forgotten about the pitchforks – thanks for reminding us …..
Exactly.
Gabbard is directly going into each IC agency to review and retrieve information. When she finds something that connects to the overall plots being used by the Fourth Branch, the DNI takes that information directly to President Trump who subsequently declassifies it and then she releases it. – Sundance
With all the leftist snipers shootings I pray and hope Tulsi has great private security protection not just the DEI hires of the Secret Service!!! JMO
President Trump needs to have Tulsi Gabbard’s back. Hold firm Mr. President.
With every post by Sundance outlining the power of the IC, I become more convinced we are being ruled/controlled by said agencies–not our elected officials.
What I don’t understand is why and how they continue to do it unfettered.
Is it because all of our politicians fear what the IC may do to them, either exposing their corruption or manufacturing some?
The why: The need for control is a reaction to fear.
The how: Follow the money.
Agree 110%.
YES
They are technically correct that it makes it more complicated for the prosecutors to depose witnesses when they can’t ask questions about classified info, but the Russiagate stuff has very little national security relevance and Trump can just declassify the pertinent information if DOJ brings him a list of what they need declassified.
Same logic as granting a witness immunity, but even weaker and silly. Q: Your clearance was revoked, the government no longer trusts you with its secrets, is that true? A: Yes, my clearance was revoked. Q: So why should we trust your testimony? A: The same way someone should trust any witness, testimony backed by corroborating documents, and objective evidence. Like a clearance means anything at all.
C;earance was revoked because they no longer have a need to know. Period
Yes; they know this but they also know a large majority of the population are either really uniformed or just outright stupid.
There am again reading about Radcliffe, Bondi and Patel. C’mon Mr. President, you can do better. It’s as if Gabbard is being hung out to dry.
We will be hung out to dry along with her if some-damn-body doesn’t get serious quick.
For Patel to clean house at FIB, would be the equivalent of a new ship captain boarding a pirate ship announcing he was going to rid the ship of pirates.
I’d like to like to see 4 major political parties next election. RFK/Gabbard v. AOC/Sanders v. Vance/Rubio v. Newsom/Shapiro. Party lines splintered – perhaps a real debate would ensue.
The Uniparty and their media allies work very hard to make sure that never happens. Ask a Libertarian, Green, or Constitution party member how that works.
Donald Trump ran for president in 2000 on the Reform Party ticket. Got off to a good start winning the CA primary (California went first for Reform Party) with ~35% in a 3 way race. He dropped out shortly after because he hit the Uniparty-media political machine head on. Wasn’t worth his time and money in 2000. I’m sure it’s a big reason he doesn’t form an official 3rd party.
Love our Tulsi!
Blessings to her and prayers for her continued success. God is working through her agency to help clean up the corrupt government!
Ridiculous doesn’t even begin to accurately describe floating the excuse of losing a clearance being an impediment to testifying on anything !!
No one would ever have to testify!
These drips are just trying to corroberate their stories with the other drips still undermining our gubmint.
The more they scramble, the closer Tulsi gets.
The more she is attacked, the greater is our support for Tulsi the true patriot!!
Just like Trump, she is strengthened and emboldened by the attackers! Tulsi is a modern day Esther!
God Bless Tulsi!
I think the deep state’s assassination of Charlie Kirk has opened the bad boys up for reigning down fire and brimstone on the perpetrators. The spiritual revival needs to be ramped up so We the People become motivated to go after these people. Start at the bottom of the food chain and work upwards. It may result in a kinetic battle but we are better off with open warfare than letting them pick us off one by one. IMHO.
I’m curious. Does info from Gabbard, Stephen Miller have to go through Susie Wiles also or do they actually go directly to President Trump? I hope it is the latter.
The Signal seems to be lost in the Noise..
Same here.
Well, they certainly can express themselves at Cabinet meetings.
As Sundance states …. “They can testify on their past conduct” … and … if necessary the President or an authorized designated representative can literally AUTHORIZE an “ON-OFF switch” for the security clearances of those being called to testify
Also, if necessary there is the declassification route available as well. I believe Tulsi G is already authorized to declassify anything dealing with Russiagate and Crossfire Hurricane .. if she has not done so already.
Look at this way … Another DoJ mole and landmine has been outted … to be fired. The downside is that Bondi has to be kicked in the ass to fire one of these exposed moles every time they appear.
It’s time to break up the DOj by distributing the prosecution function to the cabinet department that covers the criminal statute, Allow Trump to staff with MAGA aligned attorneys and neuter the DOJ.
The issue with the DOj is that the chose not to prosecute based upon the built in Obama bias. So reconstitute it.
As someone who has cleaned out many silos I can tell you that the most stinky and nasty stuff is at the bottom. It is a dirty job but is very necessary and must be done. Good luck to Tulsi and to the rest of the others. I doubt they will accomplish the task but I am hoping for the best.
It is no doubt a major task. I’ve done it successfully at 3 different companies, in 3 different industries of 3 different sizes. And the guiding principle in all 3 clean ups was logic, followed by accountability.
I only had to fire 1 person, but through holding people accountable for their duties made many quit. Lots of free loaders and lazy scum.
The firing was for a person being duplicitous and giving contracts to their former employer. I forced them to bid the work, and they then said the former employer was able to match the lowest bid. I said give it to the company that had the lowest bid first. He said no, I said you’re fired get out of here.
And each time I only brought in about half of the people’s replacements. We got more efficient with less workers. It’s not rocket science. And I can promise you, all these 3 letter agencies, have waaaaay too much dead weight. They could use a massive RIF. Around 65% from the outside looking in.
Agreed, and I have been there. However multiply that by 10,000 with attorneys the DOJ, and every 3 letter agency of the March through the Institutions actively resisting and plotting. Man, I respect President Trump more then I can say, and hesitate to judge any of his appointments facing this.
Agreed, it’s a MASSIVE task. But that’s part of being a leader. You have to understand the org chart and know the inner workings of the department. That’s step one in knowing how to chop away at the waste etc while also not screwing up operations drastically (unless that’s the intent).
“…the most stinky and nasty stuff is at the bottom.”
Indeed it is. In my (long ago) childhood I used to climb the silo associated with the barn across the road and yes the bottom was the worst. (I should not have done it! don’t recommend)
I’m curious. Is it possible that Gabbard and Ratcliffe are set up in a “good cop, bad-cop” arrangement? If both of them played the role that Gabbard presently fills, the IC might go nuclear if they don’t see a preferred distinction between the two.
If this is the case, Gabbard is cast perfectly as the bad cop from a political perspective. As a former Democrat, a woman, and service member, it is difficult for any congressional Democrat to support IC efforts to tarnish Gabbard publicly.
Thoughts?
Pretty good idea.
This old 1968-70 soldier thinks that Joan of Arc was a very effective French warrior. Just as Tulsi Gabbard is now my hero in these intense “political wars” for truth and justice in America…bill
Hold the line Tulsi. Brave and smart and willing to do her job. So far anyway. Keep going and expose them all.
I pray daily for Tulsi and entire Trump cabinet. With God all is possible. Go Tulsi Go!!!!
Were the clearances revoked or simply withdrawn? The significance of this is revocation implies some wrong doing by the member. Withdrawn means they simply don’t need it anymore because their job has changed. I suspect the clearances were withdrawn (making appeal difficult) because they didn’t require a clearance any longer and if in the future they did, the clearance could be reinstated (assuming their background investigation was still within scope).
No need to reinstate I would think, as they are testifying about the past when they had a clearance. Either way it is an easy work around.
Sundance mentioned Bondi, Patel and Ratcliffe as Cabinet members who are not facing any attacks from the Deep State.
Unless I have missed something, it seems that Rubio should be on that list too, while acknowledging his accomplishments as SOS.
May God continue to bless and protect Tulsi Gabbard. It doesn’t appear that she is getting much support from the rest of the administration, but if God is with her, that will be enough.
Well define attacks, as all have been heavily criticized.
Google news on “Tulsi Gabbard Controversies” and then Google News on “Marco Rubio Controversies.”
Compare results, focusing on 2025. It’s not even close. ODNI Gabbard clearly has a target on her back.
“the witnesses Main Justice would use have lost their security clearances”
As if confidential sources need security clearances to provide information that will be, itself, classified…
Yeah, even the facetious arguments may serve to cloud the issues. Tulsi, do NOT let them!
Blondi, Patel and Ratcliffe are all three roadblocks/ speedbumps that need to be removed.
Their actions do not help America. They are no better than Brennan, or Comey or Wray.
We need people to pay consequences. Start taking away pensions at the least. Jail or hanging is needed. Penalties being made visible to this behaviour is entirely necessary.