Speaking soon after Fox News delivered the breaking story of Pam Bondi assigning a prosecutor to start delivering evidence to a grand jury, attorney Jonathan Turley appears with Will Cain to say despite the length of time there is “hope” for criminal accountability. WATCH:
.
Posted in Uncategorized
I can’t even believe we have to “”hope”. Had this been one of us peasants there would be no statute of limitations. We’d be fitted with orange jumpsuits and locked up for good.
Spot on!
This is just how it works, unfortunately. On the bright side… we’re lucky to even have this opportunity. Realistically, nobody’s going to jail… but some serious, public Lawfare Blowback would be very welcome. Russiagate was exposed as a fraud years ago… now they/we have an opportunity to really twist the knife. More concerned with 2020, to be honest…
Watergate took some very unexpected turns. You never know.
Maybe they flipped Clapper…
Clapper knows for whom the bell tolls 🙂
I said yesterday that they should go after some low hanging fruit like Clapper and that person would be squealing like a PIG. The more sunlight and exposure there is, only helps make MAGA stronger.
Typical Fed approach is to go hard against low level functionaries with families, turn them, and use them against bigger fish. If it sounds like a mirror image of “da mob” that’s bc it is. It’s really not in Trump’s or most Republicans’ nature to be that ruthless, but it’s what this enemy calls for. Should bring Eric Dubelier in.
Prbly most effective would be to start leaking that some are ratting, then see how many defendants can be eliminated by just keeping up with obituaries. Maybe a big fish will bootstrap themselves into murder + witness tampering raps. We’re looking at some of the most entitled, emboldened, ego and avarice-driven, pure evil scumbags in the world.
Should also treat the perps like Demonrat DOInj did J6 tourists–move them from jail to jail every week or so. They could keep bouncing from FL to TX and parts in between for a long time without ever seeing a courtroom.
🔔One of your best!
The “Copper Clapper Caper” is famous!!!
Dragnet….
I saw what you did there, Wordman!! LOL!
The entire Obama White House and everyone in it, including Obama, can be charged with seditious conspiracy, the same charge they used against some of the J-6ers. There is no doubt in my mind that they are guilty of it, and I’m almost positive that a jury in Florida, hearing all the evidence, will find them guilty. That charge carries a maximum 20-year sentence, and there may be aggravating factors that could increase it.
Justice MUST BE DONE. And justice, in this case, means long prison terms in maximum security lockups – no country clubs in this case. If we don’t get long prison terms for those who called the shots – Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Jarret, Rice and others I have left out, we are not only NOT a nation of laws – we are a joke. This country can’t survive a situation where there are no consequences for these criminals, because it will happen again. Obama’s entire eight years were one long crime spree, and they MUST be locked up for it.
It will be hard to get Obongo because of Presidential Immunity (thanks to DJT) …. UNLESS … there is some evidence of him furthering or perpetuating the conspiracy AFTER he left office.
yes and no. remember …at the crux of the issue about presidential powers boils down to whether the action was official in nature, or not.
this really isn’t rocket surgery. A president for better or for worse has king like powers, but no one and I mean no one actually believes that committing criminal violations to defraud the election, to willfully subvert the those very powers of the presidency in order to protect, not the office and national security, but the interests of a political party and political power could ever possibly meet the definition of official action.
so yes, SCOTUS certainly did rule that president’s do have protections against frivolous lawsuits and even criminal charges, but they of course made it clear that the actions must be subject to a determination that the actions were official in nature, or not. And for that, they simply refuses to make any kind of qualification to address that specifically, because as SCOTUS has consistently developed such legal definitions, it would be inappropriate to do so, given the lower courts had no had the opportunity to address that part of the issue. and to this date, it remains unclear on the specifics about what makes an action, official or not.
but I think we are going to see specifics come into the debates as they will most certainly happen in lower courts when/if Obama and company are put on the spot and they defend against these charges with the typical and expected rebuttals: executive priviledge to Obama underlings…preemptive pardons exist as a result of the autopen via Joe malarkey…and entirely different universe of legal arguments that one..and then finally the actions of the president specifically..was the action official or not.
so no, it’s not settled…far from it.
now in terms of statue of limitations, I submit we are actually asking the wrong question?
sure it’s conspiracy…yes that.
but is it not also treason? while legally complex to prove, I think we all need to seriously consider the proper fit of treason as the definition of what has taken place. this was no ordinary criminal conspiracy…and neither was it a simple seditious plot.
there IS A REASON why treason does not contain a statute of limitation. Law makers were very clear that this special kind of very dangerous crime could not be treated in the same way as conspiracy or sedition. I submit that we focus on conspiracy simply as a reason to collect evidence and also to empanel grand juries. but ultimately the referral for formal criminal violations should contain treason as the proper charge…and not simply to avoid the statute of limitations legal arguments, but more aptly to add these people to the record books among the very few that actually were treasonous to the constitution, to the people, to the law they were supposed to obey, to the office in which they are sworn to enforce.
they were not simply bank robbers. they were thieves of the one thing most valuable to our nation….they stole powers that did not belong to them. they pretended to be law enforcement, protectors of law and order, and then took a giant sized dump on all of us….so that they could have power.
that is by definition, treason.
and yes, they should hang for this crime. It really is that big of a deal.
and not simply because it worked, that they were successful…that’s part of it. but mostly they should be convicted to a rope swing because of the scale and the boldness and the complete lack of any kind of contrition in doing this kind of crime.
No one is above the law. No one. These people subverted the very foundations of how the law is to operate. that is a very special kind of violation…
death sentences to each of the major players. life long prison sentences to the rest.
no quarter.
God Bless America
Jeff Childers from Coffee and COVID did an article where he showed how the SC decision actually made it easier to go after a President breaking the law.
Oath of Office. That’s the noose.
Powerful words that completely distill the reasons for going hard on these people.
The problem with treason is the legalize is steeped in ties to war.
Seditious conspiracy always seemed more likely to me as the upper bar.
Now, if they could add a RICO angle …
But that’s the ultimate end game. There’s a lot of low hanging fruit here in terms of perjury and classified document violations. Start there to get the heat going on smaller players who would likely flip for deals. And continue connecting dots to as many things as possible by the same conspirators — don’t just leave it at Crossfire Hurricane and Mueller. They already appear to be doing this with the Mar-a-Lago raid.
I doubt SCOTUS would view manipulating intelligence and collaborating with the media on that for political purposes an official presidential duty.
I don’t think we should assume nothing will happen here until it doesn’t. This is Trump and he’s had years to plan this. I don’t see him personally rolling over at this point but a lot comes down to the people he appointed.
I think it will be a good sign if we hear no leaks as it’s supposed to be for a grand jury. The grand jury process can take a long time of course, so many will get impatient. But you want it done by the book (not the same “by the book” Obama was using).
Comey Clapper Brennan
The “ignition” for a federal conspiracy charge lies in the agreement between two or more people to commit a federal crime or defraud the United States, followed by at least one overt act taken by one of the conspirators in furtherance of that agreement.
https://www.fletc.gov/audio/federal-conspiracy-law-mp3
Mentioned during https://www.fletc.gov/audio/federal-conspiracy-law-mp3
AI Overview
The Pinkerton rule, established in the 1946 case Pinkerton v. United States, holds that a member of a conspiracy can be held liable for crimes committed by their co-conspirators, even if they didn’t directly participate in or even know about those specific crimes, as long as the crimes were committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and were reasonably foreseeable, according to the Department of Justice (.gov).
Essentially, the Pinkerton rule extends criminal liability beyond direct participation in a crime to encompass the actions of co-conspirators within the scope of the agreed-upon illegal plan. This means that if a conspiracy involves a series of actions, all members of the conspiracy can be held accountable for the entire range of actions, provided they are part of the agreed-upon plan or were reasonably foreseeable consequences of that plan.
Here’s a breakdown of the key aspects of the Pinkerton rule:
Conspiracy: The Pinkerton rule applies when a defendant is charged with conspiracy.
Co-conspirator’s actions: It holds a conspirator liable for crimes committed by their co-conspirators.
Furtherance of conspiracy: The co-conspirator’s crime must be committed in furtherance of the agreed-upon conspiracy.
Reasonably foreseeable: The crime must be a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the conspiracy.
No direct participation required: The defendant doesn’t need to have participated directly in the specific crime or even have knowledge of it.
The Pinkerton rule is a powerful tool in prosecuting criminal conspiracies, as it allows prosecutors to hold all members of a conspiracy accountable for the entire range of criminal activity that occurs as part of the conspiracy. However, it’s also a controversial doctrine, as some argue that it can lead to unfair outcomes by holding individuals liable for crimes they didn’t directly commit or even know about, according to the UNH Scholars Repository.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-2482-pinkerton-vs-aiding-and-abetting
Please don’t post AI responses. Did you ever hear of the term garbage in garbage out?
AI has the same biases of the programmers.
On July 31 and Aug. 1, The New York Times ran two stories pouring cold water on the release of the previously classified “Annex” to the Report of Special Counsel John Durham dated May 23, 2023.
But the authors – Charlie Savage and Adam Goldman – misdirected their readers’ attention from the start to a non-issue, with the help of a literally false headline claiming Durham found certain documents in the Annex to have been “faked” by Russian intelligence.
That’s the basis upon which the Times, Washington Post, Politico, network news, and other legacy media have myopically focused their reporting on the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation of President Trump – which we know was “faked” by the FBI, CIA, and Obama White House.
Part of Durham’s investigation looked into why the FBI did NOTHING – literally – after first receiving the Russian intelligence information in late July 2016, as contrasted with how the FBI reacted to information nearly 60 days old received from an Australian diplomat about a meeting in a London bar.
_____
WILLIAM SHIPLEY: What the Durham Annex tells us about the Russiagate hoax
AI gets much of it’s info from mainstream government affiliated sources .
+1
Good to see Gregg Jarrett’s chubby face again. I just don’t watch Fox anymore.
Make the process the punishment. Let the fine wheels of justice bring them to their knees, financially brake them and public’s embarrassment. They will commit “process crimes”. Maybe we get a conviction but, if not, let the years weigh on them.
Plus you never know what turning over a few rocks might uncover that you didn’t expect. Perhaps millions in USAid money they don’t report.
I like the way you think…and that’s coming from a Wolverine!
Even if all you get is tax fraud or something for filing false tax returns, you can still punch them in the face.
The value of a GJ isn’t to relitigate the Russia hoax. Its value is compelling testimony that will uncover that the rolling coup never closed up shop.
They just pitched new tents called “Ukraine impeachment”, laptop lie, J6 impeachment, J6 prosecution (using an illegal special counsel, even), MaL documents hoax (including a smash and grab robbery), and both the GA and NY cases involved collaboration with the evildoers in Main Justice, the Autopen White House, and Congress.
100% accurate on how we should treat these TRAITORS. Expose them, embarrass them and ruing them FINANCIALLY.
Certainly, unlike the Russia Russia Russia claptrap, there are real reasons to spy on the conspirators communications for more evidence. Did Hilary really say, ” If he is elected we all hang” That is legal evidence.
Having worked the highest level criminal cases at the Federal level there is a near certain chance that you WILL uncover plenty of other wrongdoing as you delve into the minutiae….these are NOT good, scrupulous straight shooters. These are traitors who will do ANYthing to further their evil goals and here is betting they DID commit an abundance of unlawful acts along the way to their coup. Out the laser light on them and keep it on them. At a minimum some of them are indefensibly vulnerable and they WILL break and then…the cascade begins
Certainly. Many fields like the Mar-a-Lago raid and January 6th are rich in potential conspiracy evidence. January 6th is simply a continuation of ” get Trump.”
Agree Buck. And, for the first time, the ‘unlimited funds’ will be flowing from the side of justice instead of injustice.
The second best outcome is a stringer full of bankruptcies and humiliations; mostly though, the chance to create significant laws against politicized law fare and ballot fraud.
I think the key is to be relentless while the prosecutorial sword in in the hands of those who have been wronged for the past near-decade.
How about seizing and selling assets to pay back the American taxpayer who were forced to fund these illicit actions.
Monetary restitution and fines are part of justice and I would like a rebate check please.
Flopsy, Mopsy, Cottontail, & Peter were not to go to Mr, McGregor’s garden and were reminded their father was thrown in a pie by Mrs. McGregor. But, Peter, who was NAUGHTY went straight to Mr. McGregor’s garden. Though Peter missed baking in a pie, Peter sure as hell suffered for being naughty.
Anything in a federal building will be in Wash.DC.
Hilary stuff was all in Chapaqua so thats NY.
Comey Brennan etc probably live in either MD or VA so all look safe.
Best way is to appeal to the peoples frustration with the Deep State and have them all thrown out utterly.
The Mar-a-Lago raid was in furtherance of the Russia hoax conspiracy coverup: trying to recover the missing binder, and in the process violating a number of additional laws. That opens the Florida door.
I don’t understand why people don’t get this. If evidence shows that what they were doing somehow triggered the Mara Lago raid then you can go to Florida.
Everybody can think that collection of binder the purpose of the raid and even belive that was the purpose but can you prove that was the reason. Is that the reason given in the search warrant? The Binder is with his lawyers.
A persuasive argument can be made that everything that led up to the ML raid originated in Obama’s WH in December 2016. All the same people were involved, and the ML raid was a crime in itself. The Watergate break-in was a DC crime, but the Watergate investigation went far and wide, into other states and even into Mexico. I don’t see much of a difference here. It can easily be tried in Florida.
“Half DC lawyers went on retainer today”
THAT would be a great list to have.
Here’s the rub. The damage that will be done to this country if President Trump (that’s right!), Pam and team fumble this conspiracy will be GREATER than the conspiracy itself. This is very choppy waters we’re navigating here. They either get this air tight to drop some serious Justice or we lose the country and become a banana republic officially. Tread Carefully President Trump…
If the case is fumbled we become a banana republic. If not brought at all, we’d become a banana republic. Winner takes all so it’s do or die time.
bless both your hearts !
That’s quite a discouraging negative nelly claim, but you are likely more informed than me. What do you suggest? Give up because we might fail? Prepare better?
Thats a global claim. If we try but fail, the country is lost. I don’t think anything is that hopeless. Good has a way of Triumphing over evil when persistent.
It was the same possibility in 1776
Maybe not. If the law can’t be upheld under Trump maybe some fence sitters will realize that the republic is FUBAR and act accordingly.
The shouldn’t those same people act NOW?
Suspicious 🐱 remains… suspicious.
And there is still hope that I will win the Powerball lottery.
Only if you bought a ticket, 😂
I think both PB and MM are funding the CIA, only when they need to gin up the revenue and need a spectacular news item do they make a big public deal about Jo Blow winning in Canton Ohio or where ever winning.
I do buy a ticket every now and then, just in case I am wrong. lol
I would not be surprised at all if that were a truth, and quite frankly it makes sense and is something they would do.
Here, the lotto money is to go to the schools. Where and what does all that money do? I have been to state gov’t meetings where parents are complaining about mold in the walls and then some, w/the gov’t reps saying they don’t have enough money for the school system and the programs needed.
I was at Walmart the other day and conveniently Walmart had all the back-to-school items on sale, local high schoolers were out front handing out flyers for “Fill the Bus” w/school supplies for the poor kids. I won’t get started w/all that. What a win-win for Walmart. More supplies sold than kids that need the stuff. Quite the laundering scheme, but I digress back to your lotto theory. Plausible.
50/50 chance to win a lotto, you win or lose. The states w/the higher populations always win the lotto.
PB = Paul Bunion
MM= Marilyn Monroe
Right?
I be jiggered!
Never saw that coming!
Your chances are nonzero.
So, it turns out that someone (cough, Clapper) told the IC whistleblower to shut down his examination of alleged cyber intrusions because they were “something else” than Russian. In other words, the IC caught Joffe out of U of GA with the Alfa Bank Hoax and Brennan/Clapper covered for the hacking project by telling the analysts not to explore the Clinton’s campaign’s electronic hijinks.
https://x.com/patel_patriot/status/1950713850153652538
Whistleblowers, coming out of the woodwork.
Tell me about burden of proof/ how it works…. Say, 47 calls out barry about the birth certificate… could Barry sue for defamation? Would Barry have to produce legit doc?
…how to hack lawfare…/ kick em where it hurts
Bringing up the birth certificate only hurts the effort and allows the media to make everything out as kookery.
The best answer here is subpoenas, subpoenas, raids of households, more subpoenas, and arrests.
The birth certificate was proven fraudulent in the end .
I remember way back when Trump wanting to see the birth certificate.
Joe diGenova is reporting tonight that the grand jury will be in Miami.
For those who think this won’t happen, remember that it was the Biden Administration and special prosecutor Jack Smith who held the grand jury re: the Mar-a-Lago raid in DC instead of Florida, so the precedent has been set.
.
He did wrong, and got blasted for it.
.
Blasted by whom?
.
The judge, before dismissing his case.
.
He didn’t get blasted for the venue. She ruled he was improperly appointed.
Turley is likely just pedaling legal hope porn.
It seems like has been doing so since 2016.
When has he ever been right?
About as often as Bondì has ever arrested anyone!
When I see his name, I now ignore what he says.
Turley has a good grift going with his legal analysis o news media etc.
He doesn’t rock the boat but does usually bring a mostly constitutional law opinion to the discussion.
Exactly. I say the same thing about Turley and every time I do I get flamed – I guess by hopium addicts.
Prepare to receive the same treatment.
So? The Dems lowered the bar.
They indicted my president 200 times and put 34 false felonies on him in a Manhattan kangaroo court. We blasted them, if you count sheep bleating as “blasting”.
They have no room to complain. This is their own boomerang coming back at them.
It’s like a corner basketball game. The other side starts playing ghetto style, so do you. Or, lose every time. There’s no 3rd option
Meaningless blast, since the case was dismissed and not for that reason.
In this case two wrongs do make a right.
Blasted? How so? Do you mean scolded? As I recall, nothing was actually done.
I hadn’t read your post when I posted mine.
No need for precedent of Smith’s actions.
They can be tried in any jurisdiction where a portion of their crime occurred.
They raided Mar-a-lago in efforts towards the conspiracy. It’s perfectly legal with or without the illegal special counsel Jack Smith’s actions.
I am hoping we get military tribunals. But that’s probably too much to hope for. Bondi better not mess this up.
Who reads realrawnews?
This is an interview of Joe diGenova on Russiagate from several days ago. He thinks there will be indictments and the venue will probably be Florida.
Thank you.
What does Joe’s wife, Victoria Toensing, have to say about this? She probably has better judgment than Joe.
Brennan and Clapper keep digging a deeper hole. If these two aren’t convicted of perjury, we’ll know this inquiry is complete smoke and mirrors.
Yup.
Per Watergate…..”Let them twist slowly, twist slowly in the wind.”
Rope Springs Eternal 😉
Turdley must have been foaming at the mouth to get on camera tonight
How many people here have watched your local crooks union totally run amuck. That be elected official, businessman, lawyer and or judge. Only to have a little justice but not really much justice. A slow walked redemption tour and back in action two years out, as if they had accidentally run over the neighbors dog?
I can give you 40 years worth from the jurisdiction of a federal district. That goes for every federal district. Very seldom do certain people get served up in true justice. This will be no different. It all smoke and mirrors.
It has to be outside DC. Too many corrupt judges in the DC Circuit. Imagine if, during the GJ probe, they find the Judge Biasberg knew the FISA warrant was fraudulent, for example, and they had to arrest the judge.
If there are indictments it’ll be tied to the “rolling coup” which involves the exact same people again, and again, and again, using color of law to try and prosecute, impeach (twice), arrest (multiple times), and disqualify Trump.
Like any criminal conspiracy, you might get away with it once or twice.
But this is roughly FIVE attempts by the same people. Russia, Ukraine, J6, Docs, laptop, and also some of the same people involved in the Fani Willis and Alvin Bragg indictments.
We call it Lawfare, but in reality what it is represents a criminal conspiracy to deprive DJT and his family and allies of the Constitutional rights using the thin veneer of legitimate-looking legal maneuvers to achieve illegal ends.
In this case, the perps are responsible for the delay, so the statute of limitations should be tolled.
The conspiracy has continued to this very day, so there will be no statute of limitations problem.
That’s correct and good on Stephen Miller for calling it out on the TV the other morning
The cabal coup has never stopped
A prophetic voice in the Christian Pentecostal church declared the day after Sept 11 that a president would be raised up out of New York and serve a term for each of the towers that was struck. He has continued to speak to the nation about Trump and how God is using him to accomplish a greater thing in answer to prayers from persecuted Christian’s around the world who do not want to see America go down.
This man declared publicly after the 2020 election malfeasance that the Founding Fathers had seen into the future and had included VERY specific language within the Constitution to address this very crime and warned the criminals that GOD saw all and would hold them to account. There is no escaping Him who sees the end from the beginning. Keep praying for justice! Aug 4 is Obummer’s birthday – what a perfect day to start grand jury proceedings after the libs held protests on Trump’s birthday, Flag Day!
I agree! If the statute of limitations passed due to election malfeasance then it should be extended. Criminals should NEVER bel allowed to just run out the clock.
If that’s the case abolish all statute of limitations until we regain our republic.
The crime is in progress…
Conspiracy against rights statute 18 U.S.C. § 241.
Yep, another way to say color of law?
“By the book”
Give it to Pirro and place it in SF District.
Do not forget the Election Fraud in 2020 , 2022, and 2024.
Do not forget the Covid Shot Murders against Humanity by the Millions.
Do not forget the ActBlue Money Laundering.
Do not forget the Money Trail of the USAID, NED and others.
I believe the 2008 election was stolen as well. I had a brief flash of hope when Comey said in response to a question the the same malicious software that DNC computers were infected with , which Crowdstrike determined had not been exfoliated over the internet (Seth Rich probably downloaded the data to a thumb drive) Comey testified the same Malicious Software had been found on the RnC computers used in 2012 however the FBI did not check if that data had been exfoliated. Romney would have been almost bad as Obama
2012 was definitely stolen. I lived in FL that year, and I travelled the whole state (for work) and there were Romney/Ryan signs everywhere….even in commie Orlando….the GOP convention was in Tampa, home of SOCOM. Rick Scott….a very popular man was governor. With all that, how can anyone convince me that Obama won FL that year? Also, some of the precincts in cities like Cleveland, OH and Philadelphia had over 100% participation….and they went for Obama? Uh…yeah. Two things nailed this feeling for me…the fraud in Cleveland/Philly was never even challenged by the Romney team (paid off???) and the way FL went for Trump in 2016. Same amount of Trump signs as was for Rumney (ref Herman Cain)…maybe a bit more, but you get the point…and Trump runs away with FL. Methinks DNC hubris allowed Trump to win, i.e., they were so convinced the Hildabeast had it in the bag that they didn’t have to cheat….as much.
Now I agree….either Romney was a poser in 2012, or he was turned…but had he won we would have gone from worst to bad.
After 2020 with Biden declared victor, remember Hillary bemoaning, “I don’t know why they didn’t do that for Me!”
True, but stay focused. The laptop was central to the rolling coup, led by the FBI.
I would treat the election fraud as a separate thing because it’s too big for people to get their heads around if you try to combine it with other things.
Perfectly stated, Hokkoda. “Rolling coup” seems to be continuing to this day. Every single time these Obama “judges” ignore the Supreme Court and the Constitution to block President Trump’s executive rights, this seems to be another part of the original evil in 2016-Jan. 2017.
So lawfare.
No, we use Lawfare for legal means like FOIAs by Judicial Watch.
This is different. What the coup plotters did was try to overthrow the government using their badges as cover. “We were just investigating serious issues!” “National security, we couldn’t ignore it!”
They hid criminal activity behind a badge.
Color of law.
Hang Em’ High!!
The highest
Throw in some avenging Pale Rider for good measure.
If the Russia hoax culminated in President Trump’s rights being violated by the search for Russia documents at Mar A Lago, wouldn’t that give a reason for the case to be in Florida?
Yes, it would!
President Trump’s prosecution over the documents was also in Florida.
The question would be, were the documents the FBI was hunting Russia collusion documents.
The whole thing is part of the same plan that began with the Hillary campaign’s Russia Russia hoax, and extended to Obama’s White House in December 2016. It’s the same people and the same plan (to demonize Trump, according to the transcripts). This was a years-long conspiracy to deny Trump his lawful right to carry out his Presidential terms as provided by the U.S. Constitution, which still continues today. Florida is the appropriate venue for this case.
The raid was under Biden, who has plenty of culpability targeting Trump. He was in those early meetings with Obama Brennan and Comey, he continued the plot and may have been behind many operations including Butler.
YES
Well, if nothing happens then we will for sure know that democrats are above the law and we probably have a 3 or more tier justice system.
Maybe the news is fake but the DOJ wants both the public and the rats to think it’s real.
Better to get lower level people talking.
Bondi or someone WANTS to get people talking. Why else would there be a leak? It’s one way of ensuring some reluctant networks start talking about the scandal.
The segment kicks off with a Breaking News alert, drawing you in as Jonathan Turkey warns us not to succumb to fatigue. Keep hope alive and most importantly KEEP WATCHING. Because Jonathan and Jon Solomon have a forthcoming book that will reveal the full story.
Pre-order now for a auto pen signed copy.
Turdley and Shallowman
Drain the swamp
Bondi, hang this on your office wall, head board, shower door, fridge, bathroom mirror and every time you get the urge to play politics and go soft on the criminals so that justice is not done, take a good look at these innocent people and remember the liberals brought this on themselves.
That is a great poster. Thinking Roger Stone and anyone else whose home was raided by the “Nice Government Men” in the middle of the night should be on that graphic too. Oh and Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro.
I don’t have much “hopium” about how the exposure of these lying crooks and bastard/dess’s will turn out. But I am going to enjoy reading and watching how many crooks and liars faces have the feces of their actions rubbed and smeared into them. They won’t have a single day of a peaceful life again.
The Lord works in mysterious ways.
Stone, Bannon, Flynn, Page, Papadopolous, Peters, Melania Trump, Manafort, Lindell…
“I think we’re going to need a bigger refrigerator magnet.”
Any grand jury in Washington DC has a snowballs chance in hell of ever convicting any Democrat !! Would b total waste of time.
I want to write a play. It will be the sequel of another play. That other play is called ‘Waiting for Godot’.
This sequel will be called ‘Waiting for Indictments’.
Washington takes care of Washington. Where is the bill criminalizing this activity by intel and FBI?
Judicial Malfeasance
“While Chief Justice Roberts blathers about there being no “Obama judges or Trump judges,” district judges across the country are busily demonstrating that he’s uninformed, unintelligent, or uncandid. In the past six months, Obama and Biden judges have given a middle-finger salute to the Constitution and the voters by
telling Congress which private entities it is required to fund,limiting when and where the president can deploy troops,stipulating Executive Branch staffing levels, andwelcoming foreign criminal invaders into our country.Which party’s members appointed the judges who committed all these unconstitutional actions?
When the political affiliation of a judge is a more reliable predictor of his judicial decision-making than the language of the law, it is prima facie evidence that our government is broken. It’s still capable of legislation (Article I) and execution (Article II), but not unbiased adjudication (Article III). The United States is in a crisis, and the Dems have given Donald Trump his issue for the midterm elections.
However, the Donald still needs to personalize the issue. He needs a poster child for the crisis, the face of the problem — preferably a pompous jerk who’s easily disliked.
With that call to action, Judge James Boasberg stood tall and raised his hand.
Just like that, court malfeasance has a face. Boasberg has
imprisoned taxpayers for taking unauthorized selfies on taxpayer property, given an FBI lawyer a slap on the wrist for falsifying evidence against another American citizen (who happened to work for Trump), and ordered the president of the United States to break the law. But to win his audition for the face of judicial malpractice, Judge Boasberg did something even more outrageous. According to Margot Cleveland of The Federalist, he went to other judges and encouraged them to bias their decisions against a litigant in their courts before hearing the evidence. He even brazenly did it on the record at a judicial conference presided over by Chief Justice Roberts.Now President Trump has an avatar for the next 80/20 issue that the Dems are determined to be on the wrong side of.
Never being one to let an opposition tactical error go to waste, Trump through his Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint against Boasberg. A.G. Bondi posted this:
The complaint was filed with Judge “Sri” Srinivasan, the chief judge of appeals for the District of Columbia — an Obama judge. Did I mention that political affiliation is more predictive of federal judicial outcomes than application of the law? Hence, it is far more likely that Judge Srinivasan will provide additional evidence of Chief Justice Roberts’s foolishness than take any meaningful corrective action.
This will just reinforce President Trump’s point that the crisis is bigger than one unethical jurist…. doubt that President Trump is expecting a corrupt organization to correct itself. So why is he (or is he?) wasting his time with impotent posers who think a black robe is power?
The complaint about Judge Boasberg isn’t a plea for the system to redeem itself — even if that’s what the motion claims to be. The actual reason for the complaint is to make the crisis official and take it to the real power behind this republic: we the people. We demand it be fixed.
The district judges have been fooling around, testing how blatantly they can support the anti-MAGA resistance without consequences. Now it’s the master showman’s turn to convince the
audiencevoters that we must get the Judiciary under control or lose control of our government — and he’ll be using Judge Boasberg as his visual aid – Boasberg – the face of judicial malfeasance.Will 2026 be the year that our megalomaniac judges find out about consequences?
Will we show them that lower courts have no charter without congressional consent, no power without executive consent, and no legitimacy without our consent?”
Eventually the people, the ultimate source of legitimate government authority, will have to decide the issue.
SOURCE : https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/trump_s_next_winning_issue_judicial_malfeasance.html
The author, Mr. Green, does an excellent job in getting to the route of our major problems in this country. So, why is Sen. Thune NOT putting the Senate in recess so our President can appoint judges while they go on vacation?
this is why I read CTH comments. fantastic update and explanations…on point.
God Bless America
Sooooo much Hopium…..
The problem with indictments is that nothing will come of them and the bad taste of unaccountable corruption will just linger and linger.
I am very pessimistic about any Commie actually being held accountable, but didn’t the Communist, Democrat Party just open the door to trials being held in other jurisdictions during FJB’s “term”.
.
So many know-it-all Negative Nellies.
If I were an assigned prosecutor, and read some of the crap coming from some of you, it sure as hell wouldn’t inspire me to put my ass on the line…
I hope none of the pessimistic whiners here have responsibilities in which they have to lend support or encouragement to anyone.
.
Just a few days ago everybody was telling me this time it will be different so the negativity is surprising to me .
A watched pot never boils.
Turley said Obama would be protected because of the immunity ruling from the Supreme Court. So question is creating a conspiracy to frame a political opponent and President an official duty of the president of the United States? I thought the Supreme Court said that the president would be immune for official duties. This makes no sense that Obama would be immune for an actual crime.
.
I think Turley is wrong. But he’s a Dem. Wouldn’t do for him to say anything else re Obama.
.
He has to say that to keep the panicans from going apoplectic.
It’s controlling the masses who are not up to speed yet.
You know what I think but just in case here it is again
Unfortunately for the battered Conservatives, Lucy always gets the last laugh
It’s long past time for the battered Conservatives to bypass the football and give Lucy a sudden and swift kick in the arse…….
Even at 100 years old Hannity is going to be a handsome man.
He’s looking like Newt Gingrich here!
If convictions are probably not on the table, I’d settle for some good ol’ life and fortune destroying 4 years of lawfare that end in acquittal. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander!!!
I’d settle for some good ol’ life and fortune destroying 4 years of lawfare that end in
acquittalbankruptcy and a future of abject poverty.
“Jonathan Turley Says, “There’s Still Hope” for Indictments”
While Jonathan Turley’s opinion on the matter is of substantial value to me, of greater importance is Sundance’s take on these potential indictments.
And, the battered conservative in me keeps asking: “How many times was Trump indicted?”
I would just love to hear Biden, Obama etc. say they hate America. Just to codify the Democrat position.
Sundance has been wrong before
Not very often.
Could you cite any, or maybe just the most egregious examples?
I can’t remember when he’s been wrong and I’ve been here on and off for many years .
The crime was so large in the number of people involved, so complicated with the number actions taken, stretched out 10 years, encompassing at leather 3 foreign countries the Federal prosecutors will have use the spreadsheet compiled by loyal Americans and show the Grand Jury how the participants recruitment the day Trump announced his candidacy and President called Trump. When people make ad hominem attacks their losing and start doing crazy things to protect their image and cover up the evil they’ve done by doing wore things
Correction. President Obama called Trump a Clown.
AKA, accusation in a mirror
(1) For conspiracies under statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 371 that require an overt act, the five-year Statute of Limitations begins to run from the date of the last overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, as conspiracy is considered a continuing offense; AND
(2) There is no Statute of Limitations for the crimes of Treason.
Therefore, embrace the POWER OF *AND*: Conspiracy to Commit Treason has no Statute of Limitations AND every new day there is an overt act by The Deep State Criminals in furtherance of The Conspiracy to Commit Treason.
Make Treason Executable Again!
I was sick to my stomach when O.J. got away with murder thirty years ago!
But did he really get away with it? The former football star and Naked Gun budding actor lived out the rest of his life in disgrace. Decent people shunned him and even his children must have known in their hearts what he did to their mother.
Russiagate may be the new O.J. case, with all the MSNBC talking heads staring into the cameras with dead eyes, claiming Obama, Clinton, Brennan, Comey, Clapper and Strzok didn’t do it because the glove didn’t fit!
QJ may have skipped out on justice in front of our courts, but in the end did he skip out on Judgement?
@julie_kelly2
As I predicted.
And word of caution—beware of alleged MAGA influencers and or/former feds who claim this is a nothing burger going nowhere.
This is all new territory.
Biden regime set the new lawfare rules 2021-2025. Now it’s game time but we are the home team.
TheStormRedux
John Solomon is reporting that his sources are telling him that the Grand Jury for the Grand Conspiracy will likely take place in Florida
Half of the lawyers in Washington just went under retainer…and it seems like the other half are retaining them.
John Solomon is now reporting (if you believe him) that his sources are telling him the Grand Jury will likely be impaneled in Florida.
See:
https://x.com/TheStormRedux/status/1952492451014332859
This is becoming comical , Sundance drops one article that explains why he thinks there will be no accountability and a few hours later he drops another article that has opinions saying there may very well be accountability lol. This has been the norm the last few days .
No criticism from me because everybody has their own opinions , I’m just glad that we can hear opinions from Sundance and other highly respected people in one place.
I can’t figure out how Obama has immunity when none of what he did was “Official business” or considered in good faith .
Hey Merritt Garland! We see you 👀
Western Lensman
@WesternLensman
🔥
@MZHemingway
: Russiagate revelations “explosive” — Democrats involved in the conspiracy “should be scared.”
Video linked…
i’m sorry, but I don’t get all these so-called legal authorities who are so assured and sanguine with the idea that Barack HUSSEIN has immunity. Since when is plotting sedition against the current POTUS part of his “presidemtial duties in office” where such immunity exists?
Also, who made Turrley an authority? He seems to be quite a milque-toast and probably a bit light in the loafers, to my mind.
The x post is a bit clickbait…but in the video interview Gen Flynn says the DOJ may have shown VP Pence a fake (or manufactured) document about him which led to him having to resign.
Either that or Pence lied. He wants that document declassified to determine which it is..
Joe Dan Gorman
@JoeDanMedia
🔥Col. (Ret.) John Mills. “2 days after the election in 2016, I was called up on the NSA phone. The person said I had to be on the intelligence community assessment … we were going to prove Trump was a Russian asset, and we were going to delay or block the inauguration…”
Video linked…
Take the time to listen to the video above of John Mills. He boils it down as it happened in real time. Very succinctly too. Thanks for posting this, Troublemaker! I like the trouble you make!!
Wow, love me some Col. John Mills
Who was on the other end of the NSA phone call?
Video does not work.
Worked for me.
I hope Andrew Weismann and Marc Elias are having to wear diapers by now.
Shipwreckedcrew
@shipwreckedcrew
Me — I see a connection:
Saturday’s Confirmation of Jason Reding Quinones as U.S. Attorney for Southern District of Florida
AND
Today’s https://foxnews.com/politics/doj-launching-grand-jury-investigation-russiagate-conspiracy-allegations-source
The Fox News items is quite explicit in saying that Bondi’s Memo did not specify the District where she ordered the investigation to be opened.
Cont…