For seven straight minutes Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat and listened to criminal alien apologist Chris Van Hollen blast him for enforcing immigration laws, supporting MAGA foreign policy and revoking the guest visas for criminal protestors on college campuses. Van Hollen was trying to blast Rubio and fundraise from his far-left communist constituents. Rubio listened respectfully.
Then came the moment, “may I respond” asked Rubio, and within the response Senator Van Hollen completely lost his cool, shouted angrily at Rubio despite being told his time has expired, and was forced to listen to Senator Rubio inform him that yes, Rubio not only plans to revoke the visas of the agitators, but that Rubio had just asked for an even longer list of campus protesters who were recently arrested so he could personally ensure those visas were revoked. WATCH (prompted):
.
Marco has traveled a long way from his deep state chair on the SSCI.
I like Wolverine Rubio.
If Rubio showed this kind of fire when he was running for election, he might have come far closer than he did in the past. Man I really love what I am seeing here.
It’s about time the GOP fight back and stand their ground. For far too long they would just roll their eyes and let it happen. Well the Democrats really jumped the shark during the pandemic until now. Keep them on their heels and do not let up. It’s the only way to expose them. Ideally when they are going for the sound bite / viral video clip. Take it away from them, make it your own. That’s how you win. They have no defense for it. At least not yet.
This is a great Marco Rubio right now!
Rubio wants to be president. I think this is all for show. He’s really a Rino
JD Vance will get Trump’s nod. Rubio should wait for 2036.
I don’t expect to be here to see it, but that’s my recommendation.
I love how the Senators voting on cabinet appointee confirmations were all about ‘competence’ and ‘experience’. Yet not one Rep / Senator need be qualified for the job. All they need to do is get elected and re-elected. Heck, even former felons have been elected.
There should be term limts, albeit longer ones. Senators are on a 6 year election cycle while Reps are 2 years. They do need to be in office long enough to accomplish things. So how about limited it to 3 terms for Senators and 5 terms for Reps. They should not be allowed to conduct insider trading and there needs to be serious reform over Lobbyists. We should end the ability to attach riders to bills. If you can’t pass your pet project or favor for your constituents that nobody else wants; you shouldn’t be able to sneak it in on a totally unrelated bill. You want it then submit it under it’s own bill. Another thing, bills should not exceed 500 pages. These 2500 page monster bills are the definition of insanity.
Can’t wait to see their Golden Parachutes!
If they and family members were required to undergo an annual audit of their income sources, I believe they would be completely exposed as grifters.
This will never happen, and that’s why so many (most) of them go into office at one net worth category, but come out at much, much higher net worth.
There are all kinds of tricks they play.
I have said the same thing, and I believe DOGE is doing it quietly, methodically. We don’t know it , but that’s doesn’t matter. Be patient, be optimistic.
“They go to Washington to do good… and instead wind up
doing well.”
When lawyers write laws, you get whole trees worth of paper no one can read before being voted on. Compare that with the US Constitution and the first laws written.
Law needs to be clean clear and simple. What qualifications would you prefer to see? I want to see a resume where they actually worked a f’ing job and had advanced from the bottom to get promoted. They can learn parliamentary process later.
I think the best qualification is not wanting to do the job but doing it anyway because it’s seems to be necessary if only to prevent someone evil from taking the job.
They don’t even write most bills these days. A K street lobbyist does. Ban lobbyists and see how slow and simple things get.
1. Bills limited to 10 pages.
2. Single subject bills.
3. For every new law, must repeal 10 existing laws or regulations.
Good ideas! I’d like to add to your list ‘sunset’ provisions. IDK, 4-5-6 years and the law expires unless Congress renews.
YES! Though I always thought 10 years…or maybe match Senatorial term limits.
True….who thinks 0Crazio or GhettoCrockett has the intelligence to write legislation? Or ChynaMitch? Or JihadiOmar ?
IF, no lobbyists, no bills would be longer than 1 page bc they can’t write a sensible thesis.
start with term limits
All their investments should go into the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP, the feds’ 401k). Index funds and lifecycle funds. No individual stocks. Designed to have no significant weighting for any one stock an FDA reviewer might be regulating, for instance. It does well and has low expenses. But no insider trades that make civil servants into multimillionaires.
I’ve always detested the term “civil servant” as it’s such a misnomer. Should be re-named “self servant”.
Independent reviewers from outside of Congress should regularly examine Senators and Congressmen/women’s net worth and the net worth of family members, including wives, children, grandchildren, brothers and sisters, and parents.
Friends, neighbors and business associates too
Don’t forget off shore accounts.
Excellent idea !💡
The TSP is pretty well- run, and you’re right – pretty low expenses, too.
No funny business.
Great concept!
James, make that 2 terms for senators and you have my vote.
Ineffective if there’s no time limits for their staff who control everything.
THANK YOU
Repeal the 17th instead …
Why increase term limits for senators? If they can’t get the people’s work done in 6 year increments they dont need to be there. PDJT has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that work can get done quickly in DC, even with only 100 days…single terns only!
Everything should be one bill per item, and they should all have to write out the bill in their own handwriting. If they had to do that the bills would be short, like one page. Sorry if that is too much work for them. It would be interesting to know who can actually write.
Lobbyists and PACS should not exist. Too much power and laundering.
2 term Senators and 4 for Representatives.
I know I am dreaming.
ALSO limitations on ALL FEDERAL JUDGES! 12 years and retirement at 75 years of age. Make up of any court should not be from all Ivy League schools; each justice should be from one of the circuit court law schools.
simple logic…
Repeal the 17th
1 term senators, 2 terms reps. See my comment above.
Also require cursive.
Bills should not exceed 100 pages!!! And should cover only one subject as shown in the title of the bill, (NO MORE OMNIBUS bills!) and bills should not include penalties by reference to other statutes or regulations written by bureaucrats.
And all bills should be written/drafted by a non-partisan legislative drafting office which is part of Congressional support, like the CBO is. No more laws written by lobbyists!
Oh, and ALL laws should have a sunset provision. Like mayonnaise, old laws can go bad! Make them come up for mandatory reconsideration every five years!
Texas has a very effective Sunset Law – every Agency & Commission has to face review & justifying its work and existence. It has saved Billions of dollars.
https://www.sunset.texas.gov/
All legislation should be a single issue bill imho. No multiple issues. As you pointed out, if it can’t stand on it’s own, then is doesn’t need to be blended into another bill.
Eliminate riders period.
Term limits don’t really work. The scum just slither to other elected or appointed positions; while the good ones get booted.
that is a great point
I don’t want the great ones out after two years
its better to vote out the criminals
if we can ever get the voting systems secure
Repeal Citizen’s United and those lobbyists will have to get a real job.
Sound like ‘sound’ points to me… many Thanks.
When they REALLY want to stick it to us, they create some crises, allow it to fester for YEARS, and then say the problems are so complicated that they can not be addressed “piecemeal” and so one COMPREHENSIVE bill must be passed; they did this with Obummercare, and have been pushing it fotr years with “immigration reform”.
Can there be anything more complicated, than regulating the traffic on our roads? Pedestrians, bycyclists, blind with canes, wheelchairs, passenger cars, delivery vans, semi’s all going ever which way.
And yet our body of traffic laws were written and passed, one bill at a time.
Remember this, whenever you hear “Comprehensive” in a bills title.
We do not have “3 co-equal branches of Govt. when one has literal lifetime tenures, one has virtual lifetime tenures, and one is limited to 8 years.
Repeal the 22nd Amendment.
AND the 17th
re: “There should be term limts, albeit longer ones. Senators are on a 6 year election cycle”
REPEAL the Amendment (17th) that made senators elected in the states; GO BACK to appointments by each state …
2 for senators and 6 for house; each gets 12 years. An amendment change is also needed to put selection of senators back to state legislatures with the proviso that a senator can be recalled and replaced by the state legislature.
Make sure we repeal the 17th Amendment.
2 terms for senators. 5 terms for reps.
Term limits for members of Congress won’t achieve as much as having term limits for members of the bureaucracy.
Couple of things: 2015 first primary debate Chris Christi tore up Marco IMO. Marco was answering questions with the same eloquent precision I see in him now. Said all the right things. Christi basically inferred that Marco was an empty suit spouting BS for public consumption. I went with Christi’s charge (also after Marco walked past Ben Carson who didn’t hear his name called).
Then after all the humiliation of trying to spar with candidate Trump, ‘Little Marco’ said he wouldn’t run for the senate again. Then he does run.
So I wonder now: Could Rubio have always had conservative core beliefs and values in him all along and had to be humbled back in 2015-16? Then made to wait not knowing if he would ever ascend to anything in a Republican administration?
Did Rubio gain humility?
Did President Trump give Marco an offer he couldn’t refuse?
… The Don? 😄
There’s no substitute for experience.
Mr. Rubio started out as a Tea Party fave…
Until he got elected…
And started learning…
No one else has this man’s experience.
SOS has more than restored my respect for him as a fellow countryman.
Rubio is a wolverine until he’s not.
no, he wants to run for higher office – presidency?
Although right now I can see a Vance/Rubio ticket for 2028
Removed by poster
I remember both how great Rubio was when touting the small entrepreneurial business community, but then the disappointment I felt when Rubio was a key part of the Gang of Eight with its atrocious proposal regarding amnesty for illegals. But now, wow, his transformation into a MAGA warrior on the foreign policy front is absolutely amazing. Will the real Marco Rubio please stand up?
This is him IMO — a chameleon. This is fine if the one directing him is MAGA.
Rubio wants (needs) the coveted President Trump endorsement for 2028. Nothing more…Nothing less. But the good news is: We’ll all benefit from the future candidates “toeing the MAGA line” for four more years! (After that, the “tigers” will regrow their Uniparty stripes).
Yes, Rubio does look like a Wolverine.
I like this Rubio too. I feel like a lot of people inspired to politics are seeking moments like these only to become broken by the swamp. I didn’t expect that from Rubio but I really wanted to see that from Cruz. Cruz is a truly intelligent legal mind. He should have taken a side and the right side at that. But Cruz is his own side… I know that personality well…I have a little brother like that… only he’s not as smart as Cruz.
Cruz is my Senator. Better than Senator Cornyn all day. I concur on his adept legal mind. It’s hard to play the “What If Game” while the game is still in motion. I am a little disappointed in Senator Cruz.
There have been whispers for years Cruz was seeking a Supreme Court nod. President Trump’s first term with three Supreme Court appointments were huge wins theoretically. I wanted to see Cruz step up and get one of those nominations. Alas, we are saddled with Supremes Gorsuch, Kavanaugh , & Barrett. Barrett being a neoliberal is a huge disappointment and betrayal. Senator Cruz would have been great new conservative anchor to the Supreme Court.
Will the opportunity present itself again? Maybe Cruz is a better servant to the Republic as a Senator. I lean towards the Supreme Court being his best and most consequential “what if”.
Or he would make a cgoid Solicitor General, but NOT A.G., as does not work well with others .
never forget his speech at the 2016 republican convention
I think the first sentence should be “listened to criminal AND alien apologist Chris….”
Rump roast is just easier to pronounce.
Unfortunately this is my senator. What a disgrace.
I’ll call you with Tim Kaine and raise you one, Mark Warner.
I fold
My take is that Rubio isn’t faking this. He’s the real deal. It just took him some time to discover that President Trump is the real deal as well. 47 saw it in him. Vance saw it in him. Now it is on display for the rest of us. Go get ’em!
My reaction is that I currently really like what I am witnessing.
Jesus changed his life. Many people have prayed for him.
I hope that’s true
Verify before trusting?
Good show, though.
Wolverine Rubio!
Indeed!
‘Bout darn time they get put in their place. Stop being nice and cordial with these repugnant traitors.
“Marco has traveled a long way from his deep state chair on the SSCI.
I like Wolverine Rubio.”
Someone must have pointed him to the CTH where he was able to learn (Sundance has provided the receipts) just how corrupt his SSCI silo really is. LOL
Wolverine Rubio indeed. This guy is a keeper. Van Hollen is my Senator and I absolutely LOVED seeing him reduced to worm food. This is how we are taught to fight. Wolverine R had his notes ready and smacked the bark off the tree.
This Maryland Man is happy tonight.
You are a triple M – MAGA Maryland man.
Van Hollen and his ilk must get compensated well from the cartels. they always seem to be from blue states surrounding DC, so it cant be the Real Estate lobby – these idiots will just contribute to the market crash in 2026 when they all get voted out and have to sell their houses. I’m probably overestimating the IQ of their voters, though.
I think Marco is looking for a USSC appointment down the road, more so that a shot at being prez….just my take.
Concur, Marco has the temperament and intelligence for such a role.
Holland is a piece of human excrement
Hollen has been trying to become a thing after coming up empty-handed by traveling to El Salvador to demand the illegal immigrant Abergo Garcia’s release.
Rubio was there for a hearing about the budget but got attacked by Hollen over student visas, illegal immigrant gang members, and USAID. Rubio gave Hollen his furious minute indelible fame; by reiterating the fact that “yes, they deported people to El Salvador, and all gang members, including “the one you had a margarita with”.
Van Hollen was shut down by Rubio during the hearing and later took to Twitter using video from the Tuesday hearing with criticisms which I think were what prompted Rubio to go off in the first place. But Rubio wasn’t done there. He also dismantled Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) and the Democrats’ obsession over the admission of the small group of 59 South African white people as refugees.
Instead of helping his case, Van Hollen made it worse for himself.
ChrisVanHollen
The Marco Rubio who testified today is not the one I served with in the Senate. He has had a full MAGA lobotomy. Today I directly told him about the many ways he has betrayed American values and interests:
People at X threw his arguments back in his face.
“Betraying American values and interests? Quite the projection given your defense of an illegal alien gang banger, wife beater and human trafficker”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/foreign-policy/3417334/marco-rubio-chris-van-hollen-lock-horns-senate-hearing-usaid-deportations/
Why didn’t they cut the mic on that Dem treasonous moron? Just turn off his mic.
It is because they can’t keep their lips zipped they reveal the swill out of their posturing guts.
Yes, I like this version of Rubio. But I will never forget how he betrayed the Tea Party people back when he was first running for the Senate. I’m just not sure Marco Rubio can be trusted. He seems to be a chameleon.
Maybe he has a vendetta against certain people. This is how he gets even
We have completely underestimated Marco Rubio.
I know I have.
Gawd….!
What a force of competency and confidence!!!!
He definitely is a contender for 2028.
Agreed Sundance, Rubin’s come a long way & I’m glad to see it.
But I would still critique him at least weekly, and I don’t mean weakly.
I’m so proud of Little Marco. He’s so grown up now.
He has been DOGEd.
Someone mentioned that Van Hollen was born in Pakistan. Went to look it up, yes, Van Hollen was born in Pakistan because Van Hollen’s parents worked in diplomatic services. This is bot a problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Van_Hollen
Interesting though that Van Hollen’s mom worked for the CIA and State Department. And that Pelosi created a special job position just for him. Pelosi seems very crooked.
Pelosi
seemsis very crooked.I will never trust Rubio but he is a great politician. That is not a compliment. He is not MAGA. He just happens to see which way the wind is blowing.
Wrongo.
Someone’s going full wolverine & gunning for Trump’s endorsement in 2028!
It’s like a high level episode of ‘The Apprentice’. Rubio. Vance, et al all hoping to win the grand prize.
These are fascinating times were living in.
Epic! It may even make SNL’s cold open…yes?
Maybe Rubio’s prior position was powerless to do anything about the corruption and had to stay quiet and take it.
I watched the whole hearing. Wolferine Marco did an outstanding job. Tammy Bruce was visible in her seat over his left shoulder. She kept a straight face the entire time.
My favorite part was when Senator Jacky Rosen blatantly shilled for Bill Gates’ pet project GAVI. That is his entity through which he pushes vaccines (including experimental ones) onto 3rd world nations. GAVI has been known to negotiate with foreign governments to make participation in a vaccine trial mandatory for infants.
Late last year, GAVI provided funding (probably from us) for Unicef to conduct a 2-step mass vaccination project in Gaza. Medical personnel administered a new oral polio vaccine to as many of the Gazan kids age 10 and younger as possible. This vaccine was distributed using an emergency use listing (EUL) from the WHO. This project was hailed as a great humanitarian effort. Maybe so but it was in fact a clinical trial. Now let’s see how the data collection goes.
Senator Rosen tried to get Rubio to commit to restoring funding to GAVI. Rubio took evasive action. Rubio said that the State Dept will continue with a vaccine program but through a program State will control, not through the “current stand-alone” situation. It seemed evident that Bill Gates has been cut off and will stay that way even though Jacky Rosen thinks Rubio has restored funding to GAVI.
So much winning. Sorry, Bill.
.
Marco Rubio may be the epitome example of “everything/everyone is not all-good or all-bad”. I’ve denigrated Rubio in the past. (I was going to list, confess to, some of it here, but I’ve reconsidered doing so as unproductive and irrelevant to judging the man on his actual record now.)
Two things.
(1) Rubio is the epitome of someone who is self-made and who has done what he’s had to in order to spend many years clawing his way up through the vicious political system. He doesn’t come from a fancy family. He didn’t attend fancy schools. He didn’t, pre-politics, have notoriety or celebrity gained from some military or business success, or other outside achievement that garnered him attention.
(2) There is no record anywhere of Rubio having “cashed in” on his political career; in fact, his net worth is decidedly scandal-free and nondescript for a lawyer with now decades of this kind of work and connections.
I’m also liking what I’m seeing. Go for it, Marco; you’ve won me over.
.
I’ve always liked Rubio & actually admired that he had the guts ( in our gutless Congress) to attempt to solve one of our most serious issues – Immigration Law.
I worried about it because he was so new to Congress – sworn in in 2011 as a Senator, tossed into a pool of corrupt Senators like John McCain, Jeff Flake as his “team” against Durbin/Schummer. Mike Lee hadn’t found his voice yet and was also steamrolled – not to mention that Texas was left totally out of the entire process.
It was a recipe for disaster- Rubio simply did not have the experience or institutional knowledge in that crowd. The Democrats encerted poison pills as they always do & Rubio paid the price for all of it.
However – don’t forget ( or at least I didn’t forget) that Rubio not only stopped advocating his own bill; he stopped supporting it. First, he signaled that the House should not take up the bill, saying that other matters, like repealing Obamacare, were a higher priority. Since then, he has said that though he still supports reform, the comprehensive approach he backed with the Gang of Eight was the wrong approach.
What we know now, a decade later is that the entire Immigration Law abuse has come close to destroying us.
At some point— somebody has to do something. The Rubio situation has made it clear why nobody dares to even attempt it.
Yeah loving Wolverine Rubio, little hands turned into big shoes.
It is somewhat interesting that of all of President Trump’s picks that we ‘lauded’, the one we questioned (Rubio) turns out to be the shining star. Whatever his motive, whether VP in 2028 or motives beyond, it is quite entertaining to watch him respond to the likes of Van Hollen, and watch Van Hollen totally lose his cool.
Also, sailed thru confirmation, getting nearly 100% support, HII
Let’s hope that this is a real and gut level transformation that is now set in concrete.
More evidence of “The Great Choosing of Sides”?
At this point, no one can believe this can be settled using the customary political process. It is theatre now, laying groundwork and precepts, building support, by displaying our righteousness. The left has been doing this for decades.
The left went “all in” decades ago, the right is only now realizing it enough to begin to push back. No one can believe the left will concede, under any circumstances. We have had ample demonstration of the fact that the covert political process no longer serves us, has not for some time, and likely never has.
Wake up. Time for clear thinking about the future.
If the liberals cared so much for starving kids in Africa why did they allow the agency charged with providing turn into such a cesspool of fraud, waste, and abuse of power?
This what political terrorists do, much like Hamas tunnels being built under hospitals to protect them. They use a few legitimate programs as cover for all the dastardly deeds they do and then scream when someone has the balls to cut them.
Van Holland screeching in the background is absolutely hilarious. No conviction in it at all. What little relevance he ever had is still back at that Margarita shack in Salvador. This new Rubio is bada$$!
From Grok:
Rumeysa Ozturk, is a Tufts University scholar mentioned by Senator Chris Van Hollen during a heated Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on May 20, 2025, where Secretary of State Marco Rubio testified.
Background: Rumeysa Ozturk is a Tufts University student from Turkey whose student visa was revoked by the Trump administration. The revocation was based on her co-writing an op-ed critical of Israel’s war in Gaza, which the State Department claimed indicated “support for a designated terrorist organization.” However, no evidence of links to terrorism or antisemitic statements was presented in court documents
The op-ed co-authored by Rumeysa Ozturk was published in The Tufts Daily on March 26, 2024, titled “Try again, President Kumar: Renewing calls for Tufts to adopt March 4 TCU Senate resolutions.” It was written by four students, including Ozturk, and endorsed by 32 others. The article criticizes Tufts University’s response to the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate resolutions, calling for the university to acknowledge the “Palestinian genocide” and divest from companies with ties to Israel due to the conflict in Gaza.
The piece does not mention Hamas or advocate for violence, focusing instead on divestment and acknowledgment of human rights concerns in Gaza, referencing claims of “deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide.”
The article aligns with broader student activism, citing the International Court of Justice’s assessment of a “plausible risk of genocide” in Gaza.
[snip]
Re: referencing claims of “deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide.” As Senator Van Hollen accused Rubio of presenting no evidence of support for terrorism, Ozturk’s op ed presented no evidence of “deliberate starvation or indiscriminate slaughter.” As Grok (regretfully?) notes: ‘However, based on the available information and analysis of the op-ed, it does not include specific evidence, photos, or direct testimonies from widespread reporting by reputable news organizations to substantiate the claim of starvation.’
As for genocide, I asked Grok if dropping leaflets, making phone calls and ‘roof knocking’ would be considered indiscriminate slaughter. (You can usually tell where Grok stands on an issue even though he tries to hide it). He (regretfully?) notes: ‘Dropping leaflets and making phone calls to warn residents of a targeted area are unlikely, in isolation, to be considered “indiscriminate slaughter” under IHL, as they demonstrate an intent to minimize civilian harm. However,…..blah, blah,blah.’
Grok has his talking points:
The hearing also heavily focused on the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran father from Maryland who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. Van Hollen criticized Rubio for flouting a unanimous Supreme Court order to facilitate Garcia’s return, and Rubio responded by falsely claiming Garcia was a gang member and human trafficker, referencing a debunked claim about Van Hollen having a margarita with him during a visit to El Salvador. This exchange further fueled the heated confrontation.
Since Grok is AI, the more that inaccurate talking points are repeated on the internet, the more weight Grok will ascribe to those talking points.
I tend to skip the AI articles because they are – by design – garbage in, garbage out.
Trump is setting up Vance/Rubio 2028 and it’s a good thing.
I like Wolverine Rubio too!
I was very, very concerned when Trump appointed Rubio as SOS. Needless to say, I have been more than pleasantly surprised, and this one responding to Van Hollen glorious!!!
I just hope he continues on this pathway!
So nice to see Rubio toss it right back at the disingenuous (grandstanding liars) who were his former equal perfumed princes. He’s w-a-y beyond them now and they know it!
You’d think with all the info that has come to light since his disastrous trip to visit Abrego Garcia, Van Hollen would slink away in shame..but the dems are just dead set on destroying themselves….and I am enjoying watching it happen……
I like what he did to that drunken poseur Kaine
As an observation probably based on a visceral mistrust I have with Sec. Rubio, I have noticed Sec. Rubio being covered a lot with primarily positive, even glowing praise lately. I have noticed a falling off of such coverage of Vice President Vance whom, by the way, I also don’t fully trust but whom I trust more than Rubio.
I am now wondering if Rubio is simply playing his part in the Potempkin Village production to fool us MAGA adherents. After all, Rubio has been fully indoctrinated in the corrupt DC machine whereas Vance has only just entered the production. Has Rubio ever revealed or even hinted at the corrupt handling within the SSCI during Russia-gate?
I would be interested to know if anyone else feels the same.
I must say, i recall an article written by Sundance telling to be wary of Rubio. I too was very wary because of his IC connections. I am glad to see the judgement change towards him, however, it is very early. I am optimistic, but like Ronny, trust but verify.
Ted Cruz opened a can of whoopass on Van Hollen. That poor little Maryland boy must not know that his party lost the White House in 2024. And that our first amendment does not guarantee speech protections to aliens here on visas.
I’ve always hoped that somehow, some way, the young Marco Rubio I saw in his first major campaign would emerge again.
Perhaps it has.
He could be playing us, yes, but my heart and now even my head says that he wished to leave the Senate so the real Marco could emerge, could be FREE.