Well, this is interesting… Or then again, well, it could be just another political Bondi bondo effort.
During a segment of Fox News, Attorney General Pam Bondi says she has the Epstein client list on her desk, and follows up with, “I’m reviewing that.” Meanwhile, like most non-pretending observers, Sandra Smith maintains a suspicious cat face the entire time. WATCH:
Every lib who accused Trump of being implicated in the Epstein case looks really dumb right now.
Pam Bondi just said that Trump directed her to release the Epstein client list. 👀 pic.twitter.com/wi4ayqUx7V
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) February 21, 2025
.
Bondi will also deliver the oath of office to FBI Director Kash Patel.

NOT into games Pam.
ok, we are DONE with this passive, Trey Gowdy, Jim Jordan, Marsha Blackburn…..TOUGH, BIG, WE GONNA…..crap….and DO NOTHING….
IF you lead with THIS statement, you best deliver.
Don’t, and your 4Y are history…..
I’m waiting to see how this comes out…..in blacked out dribs or the real deal. I think this will reveal how Bondi actually will perform. I’m still very skeptical of Bondi.
IMO Bondi will perform exactly the way President wants her to perform. These heads of Departments are not like the loose cannons of the past. If Bondi’s holding off on releasing anything it’s because Trump prefers it that way and is using it for some purpose. For to long we’ve thought government departments were separate entities with the ability to set policy and even law how ever they choose. No more. Every Federal Department that is under the Executive Branch is supposed to carry out the dictates of the President and President Trump has made it very clear what those dictates are.
A “Client List” could simply refer to the names of the people Epstein gave financial advice to during his career.
What I would like to see is the “Card Catalog” of the videos he surreptitiously recorded of the people he extorted
I’m thinking that Pam is being purposely vague in order to make someone “Sweat”
Who’s she trying to get to roll over? (Or maybe silence)???
How many desks has that list been on?
What a silly question. How about “Why does it need to be reviewed?” Doesn’t that lend itself to theories of protecting certain individuals and targeting others? Release the damn file!!
I believe in Bondi to the same degree that I believe in the Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Unicorns, Santa Claus, and free lunches….in other words, not at all. I hope she proves me wrong.
Bondi is Corrupt. She hasn’t addressed her fake witness Brittany Eugene.
Bondi’s fake witness and her corrupt DA were fine railroading an innocent man George Zimmerman.
BONDI IS RESPONSIBLE FOR BLM.
Pam is a FILTHY AG.
Pam will disappoint.
I’m a bit cynical.
This day was coming and she is actually the head of the FBI also.
The other thing being is another committee needed to release the JFK and other files like it?MLK etc?
Bondi and Patel are starting to smell a little swampy as they continue to break Patel’s promise to release the list on Day One.
Did someone get to them one of “six ways from Sunday,” so to speak?
I truthfully don’t care who shot JFK or MLK or RFK. Anyone who was involved in those crimes are either long dead or so old that they might as well be dead.
The scummy fish that Epstein hooked up to rape underage girls are still swimming in the human gene pool.
Which is of higher priority, decades-old conspiracies or living, breathing scum who ought not be above the law?
We need to care who was responsible for the deaths of JFK, MLK, and RFK. Not exposing these criminals, and prosecuting them to the full extent of the law, only serves to embolden others to try similar crimes knowing there is precedent that they will not be prosecuted. Creating an environment where people can think of themselves as above the law, and immune to prosecution, is what helps to fuel the Epstein types and their crimes, and what led to the deaths of JFK, MLK, and RFK.
If one of the conspirators was only 20 years old in 1963, he would be 81 today. Would someone involve a 20-year-old in a plan like that? Color me skeptical, but okay, root them out and punish them if they’re alive and expose them if they’re dead. Just prioritize the Epstein list first.
I hope I’m wrong, but I don’t think that list will ever see the light of day unredacted. It could nuke the uniparty. A lot of naive people would be shocked by who is probably on that list. I’m all for releasing it, but the fallout could be f**king ENORMOUS. A lot of people would be very upset that many important people, some of whom they voted for, were child predators. Not only do I think the people should know the truth, but the crimes against young people should not go unpunished. Let the chips fall.
All of this should be made 100% public – now. To hell with nuance – shine the white hot spotlight on every thing and everyone involved.
I don’t trust Pam Bondi.
When asked if she had seen anything that made her say “oh my gosh”, she said not yet. I suspect that means she hasn’t begun her review yet, or she’s lying.
A brave patriot would leak it unredacted asap.