This is quite remarkable and brilliantly done. While we don’t need anything to confirm what our eyes and ears clearly heard/saw, a guy uploaded the entire transcript of the ABC debate into ChatGPT and asked the artificial intelligence system to review the content for the presence of bias. [Source Link] ChatGPT then analyzed the transcript and gives a summary opinion. The result is pretty amazing.
...”So, this guy put the entire debate transcript in ChatGPT and asked ChatGPT to analyze the moderator bias and every single person needs to hear this because oh my God is it right on the money.”
So this guy put the entire debate transcript in ChatGPT and asked ChatGPT to analyze the moderator bias and every single person needs to hear this because oh my God is it right on the money. pic.twitter.com/aRyythOB6V
— Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) September 12, 2024
.
As previously mentioned, do not negate the ability of the American public to see through the manipulation by media. This is not 2015.
We are now in an era where institutional biases have been in the public spotlight for almost a decade. The gaslighting no longer carries the same impact or value. Unfortunately, politicians in a bubble are usually the last people to understand where the American public stand on any issue.
This is also a dangerous time. The most dangerous time in the lifecycle of any victim is that moment when the abuser realizes all of the prior behavioral control mechanisms no longer work.
Think Poland circa 1985, We The People have been in an abusive relationship with govt; President Donald Trump has led people to the streets and now a significant majority fully understand the scale of our assembly.
Thanks in part to the COVID-19 overreach, the govt (mostly DHS) is left controlling social media platforms that have lost their ability to constrain the free expression narrative. Alternate communication networks are now plentiful; hence we see the U.S govt and Intelligence Community trying desperately to control Telegram, TikTok, Rumble and other venues.
Be thankful that God has allowed you to see what is unfolding. Others that remain asleep are not as lucky as you. Ask yourself in prayer, why you. Why now? Then, think about this daily in your quiet time.
Affirm your spirit and allow this sense of fortunate knowledge to elevate your faith and confidence in a loving and purposeful God. You have the unique gift of discernment. Ultimately, you have been chosen.
Be thankful. Remember, Romans 13:12
Live a positive, affirming, purposeful and incredible life.
Within every battle, challenge and contest we encounter, always remember to be thankful and continue living your best life.
Thank you, Sundance!
LMAO — Careers of Muir and Davis are over. Same with that dumass Walden (Harris’s college bud).
These three have earned the fate of Crowley after her moderator fail in the 2012 Prez debate (sorry, can’t bring myself to type the names of either man — hurts my fingers).
Crowley’s career went down the tubes after 2012 (well earned). And the same will happen to Flopsy, Mopsy & bimbo.
CNN Debate #1 knocked Biden out
ABC Debate #2 might knock out ABC News
I look forward to seeing if the Vice Presidential debate has JD Vance knocking out Tampon-Tim Schmaltz.
Yes. Thank you, Sundance. Beautifully written.
Problem is that AI is a hundred times smarter that the typical voter….
Not smarter, bigger memory. Two different things.
More memory and probably more analytical.
AI is not burdened by political correctness when undeniable patterns are recognized.
Never fear, AI will be tweaked by Big Brother if it isn’t already.
Just change a few decision points in the hierarchy tree and sky net will be bent to suit whomever.
Wow. No.
AI does not think. It is a complicated set of look up tables and a natural language front end. It is as biased as its “training material”, which is almost exclusively far left wing. On occasion, you can find a gap in its creators training, such as Sundance’s example. Rest assured, the left is retraining its silicon child as we speak.
Do not elevate AI above anything more than a tool. Just as humans can never be greater than God, AI can never be greater than humans.
Thanks CattleDog!! It’s a machine programmed by a human. Nothing more.
Yep. Don’t allow Hollywood propaganda to make you think there’s more there than actually exists. Remember movies are entertainment and propaganda.
Well done, Eliza.
Just like election machines, as imperfect as the programmer….
AI “is as biased as its “training material”, which is almost exclusively far left wing.”
Very likely true. Maybe AI didn’t realize that Trump was the Republican candidate.
I’d be interested in whether AI can be used to identify IF KH was wearing an audio earring – being fed her lines.
And … maybe add into the assessment re: bias the fact the owner of ABC is a close friend of KH.
And …the whitleblower’s affidavit saying KH received the questions b4 the debate and demanded that only Trump would be fact checked and she would be permitted to spew any lie unchallenged.
The manufacturer of said earrings studiously avoided confirming or denying if she was.
They said they looked remarkably like them…
I bet sales numbers of those earrings have exploded. The manufacturer is laughing all the way to the bank.
AI is unburdened by any moral code.
AI repeats any concept which 50.00001% have posted, even if the sample space of that AI was 99% left wing woke progressive.
If I sample 100 walkers on 5th avenue and madison in NYC , I’m likely to find a bias.
And that’s where the favorite and frequently posted polls come from.
Chat GPT will not give that analysis for very long. The program will be enhanced to give a correct answer. This one slipped through the cracks.
A Google search a few years ago on CO2 would give that increasing quantities of CO2 increase plant growth and plants transpire less water. Do a search on CO2 now and you would think it is some kind of poison. AI is just a socialist’s name for do what you are told.
Unburdened by what has been……?
I see what you did there. 😉
Marx in the Machine.
AI is a computer program. The old adage “garbage in, garbage out” still applies.
AI can be made woke, ignorant, racist, marxist and stupid. It all depends on what the organization developing the AI presents to the neural network for training.
Yep, as a former programmer, exactly right!
there is the potential for bias and political correctness to be built into any AI system…and it usually is!
From what I’ve read it actually is – its original programming at this point is severely tainted by the left – all those pictures of historical white people rendered as black was the giveaway…
Nay. It may be powerful programming but it is still constrained within the limits of its programming. Dullards are programmed too, however if you can lock up a dullard’s programming their mind has to function whereas a computer crashes.
I have no idea, but I would guess that about 1/3 of US citizens are ideologically demoralized to the point where they are trained to react to the government run media. They are reliable in their reactions to media programming. That makes them very dangerous to those free thinkers dedicated to protecting our Natural Rights. we saw that in covid. you cannot live in a society with them and have any expectation of safety.
CUT THE CORD
Yes, but we have lots of dumb voters who do have the ability to watch a Tik Tok video. Tik Tok is full of MAGA memes that are moving young people toward Trump.
🕯 TY
Thank the young Barron Trump for telling his father about the social media and podcast world.
The problem the Democrats have is people go shopping at least one time a week and get slapped in the face with the Truth.
They cannot help see all the gasoline signs. We may be dumb but we are not that dumb. FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT
😂
AI doesn’t have to purchase food, clothing, cars, insurance, gas
AI has NO EMOTION
I don’t care how many different permutations there are for AI to predict a human being’s reaction to a dataset; the fact remains that human beings are emotional and carrying varying degrees of scars on their lives.
NO AI Can ever replicate the HUMAN experience.
Especially if your pet cat Fluffy just got snatched up and eaten by a Haitian.
Only as smart as the nearest coder…
Yep
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer and Stephen Gardner both had different focus groups highlighted from their podcasts from the debate showing President Trump winning over independents after the debate by two to one yet the media was going with Harris winning. Always gaslighting all the time.
You know, think about it . . . with all the gaslighting the politicians, political parties and news media perpetrate on the citizens, they must have one hell of a big carbon footprint!
Yep. One heck of a methane gas bubble.
ROFL
There should be an investigation and the results should be released in Oct. You know it was rigged.
And who would do that?
Lolol
ABC should investigate themselves. Just like all the others do so we can have a big laugh.
Believe it or not, I think they did announce they were going to or already have investigated themselves.
😃 😀 😄
Actually, fact checking isn’t part of a moderator’s role, IMHO.
No, it is not. Fact checking is up to the listeners. God gives us the gift of discernment for a reason.
AKA critical thinking!
Not necessarily “critical thinking,” since discernment includes wisdom, taste, perception, and discretion, among other things.
Wasn’t that in short supply during the scamdemic.
He gives that gift to who?
To anyone who asks with sincerity of heart.
And believes that God is who He says He is — i.e., anyone who believes His promises.
The gift of critical thinking accompanies the gift of a rational mind.
Some people don’t use it. It requires discernment and some effort.
Critical thinking, like critical race theory, is a term the left came up with to replace common sense or logical thinking. As always, with the left every thing is ‘critical’.
Uh…no, not quite.
The term critical thinking has been around a very long time and was not originated by the left.
Perhaps some of them have somehow appropriated and twisted it into some other meaning. Happens all the time these days.
But it does not belong to the left.
“Fact Checking” is one of those knee-jerk reactionary tropes that excuse individuals from the responsibility to check for themselves claims made by politicians.
Yes. But even more, “”fact-checking”” is a powerful means of propaganda used by the media for the benefit of those who have bought them.
(It needed an extra set of sarcastic quote marks around it.)
Yes; it’s not like the “fact-checkers” are unburdened from BIAS.
Note how the ABC team did not so much “fact check” as check to attack any deviation from official regime narratives.
For example on the “eating cats and dogs” issue they positioned a town official’s statement as unquestionable fact but totally dismissed and sneered at the actual witness statements from ordinary people in Springfield. Of course the media has done zero actual on the ground investigation. Whatever the official government person said was the only acceptable story.
This is the media’s mode of operation in today’s Regime Media era.
And, computers…many are too lazy to look it up, however!
Of course it isn’t. You are correct. The very idea of “fact checkers” everywhere the truth can escape their censorship should tell us something. Fact checking is a fancy term for censors.
Only communists bent on censorship and propaganda need “fact checkers” to disrupt or block the discernment of real information. It is communist terminology.
Future debates should be conducted like a church bingo game – or like they used to have at the movie theaters –
but in this case, have all kinds of questions by the citizens in the audience written down on scraps of paper and directly put into the barrel that would be spun around – no “review” by any moderators – citizens from the audience would be randomly chosen (from another spinning barrel with their ticket stubs) to take turns spinning the questions barrel – then the question slip would be handed to the announcer at the microphone who would ask the question posed by the citizen. The questions would go all over the place and would not be grouped into areas before being asked.
My proposal:
Each candidate submits 20 questions. They are placed in sealed identical envelopes and brought to the debate.
On live TV, those envelopes are placed by each candidate into a raffle tumbler and mixed. They are then removed one at a time and numbered. The numbered envelopes are placed on a wall.
40 bingo balls are placed into a bingo hopper. The “moderator” calls the number and then grabs the corresponding envelope, opens and reads the question. The moderator then becomes a time keeper only.
Sounds like much more fun than the usual Bingo game my wife drags me to.
But it’s a great idea,
The Moderators should merely be question readers.
I volunteer to be one, please.
Great idea. Moderators should not have any ideological skin in the game.
You ever think how useless a person is who watches these “debates” and agrees with either one of the candidates? Or the moderator?
These are on a screen, scripted, edited, nothing is real yet a decision is made by the showing of it. It’s like believing the actor in a Superman show or movie has real powers. None is real.
What is real? You have illegals all over, your money is almost worthless, the banks run everything and soon will own everything. We work day and night to pay for others to not work.
We have distanced ourselves from freedom by group thought and……isolation. We are almost all the same, want the same. Some people are just insane and we allow them to have a voice, power, influence. DEI, a perfect example.
All of our thoughts cannot solve this, it has to be by the manual, it’s why we were given the Bible. When we all realize this and put it into practice, we will walk out of this mess.
They were not fact checking. They were Narrative Pushing.
Bingo
On the money. Which “fact checkers” actually calling themselves fact checkers are, in fact, fact checkers?
The appeal to “fact checkers” is a sop to low-information, low IQ listeners/viewers — so typical of “debates” these days, that organizers would just naturally assume that their audience is comprised of lightweight rubes.
Fact checking is the job of the debate opponent. These scripted productions that we call “debates” don’t allow for actual debate.
Fact Checking is something an interviewer might do, not a debate moderator. In a debate the other debater is the only one who should make any checks or comments about their opponent’s statements.
Also both debaters should need to answer the exact same questions. The question should be sufficiently neutral so that both debaters would need to answer based on their own policy positions. There should be no putting cherry-picked targeted questions to each debater. Kamala got softball (or T-ball) type questions but Trump got brushbacks and beanballs aimed at his head.
The ABC crew showed their lack of professionalism by failing to understand what their task was supposed to be.
Au contraire, they fully understood what their task was suppoed to be.
>” The most dangerous time in the lifecycle of any victim is that moment when the abuser realizes all of the prior behavioral control mechanisms no longer work.”
This is how it always is when dark personalities are confronted with imminent exposure and suffer permanent damage to their carefully concocted public personas.
Expect their explosions of fury to be white hot and direct. Which may or may not be publicly visible. But the pressure on their minions to do drastic things will be off the charts.
I’m not talking about media personalities per se, but the controlling interests upstream from them.
Societal domestic abuse and political domestic abuse seriously mirror each other.
Definitely concur. Dark personalities are dangerous. Scale is the only meaningful difference between domestic abuse and political abuse. The numbers of people affected and the amount of damage is obviously far greater when Dark personalities take control of governing institutions as they have in America.
Yes! Anyone who thinks the current globalist leftists will quietly admit defeat are part of the problem. The trash currently destroying America will gladly burn it down to rule over the ashes. That is where we’re headed
That’s what I’m thinking too. But there is an upside: The curtain that our pathological elites use to cloak their machinations won’t survive the flames. Pretending will suddenly become almost impossible for the rulers and the ruled alike.
We, of necessity, must therefore appeal to the highest authority by bringing our petitions before the LORD of glory, who ever lives to intercede for us.
Paraphrase of Hebrews 7:25
https://biblehub.com/niv/hebrews/7-25.htm
Also Psalm 46:1 Martin Luther’s Psalm which inspired him to write, “A Mighty Fortress is Our God.”
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=a+mighty+fortress+is+our+god+youtube&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D8XUYZoguhEQ
When Trump wins the election, we should expect in a controlled almost scripted method 1,000 terrorist events simultaneous around the country.
HOW we patriots , and the gummint, respond to this event will be in the history books forever.
I think people need to be very very smart, very careful, and very determined about how and what they do in response.
Nothing the Democrats engage in is not manipulated by them first…they cheat at 100%
of every action they are involved in.
I’ll give a double thumbs up if you’ll strike Democrats and replace with ‘Uniparty’ politicians.
<smiles>
They simply cannot win if the do not lie cheat, and steal and they know this very well.
They are of their father, Satan.
People of the Lie.
What would you expect from the party of satan.
That’s funny. Frowney faces abound at ABC HQ. 😂
Bet they didn’t want this to get out either…
A tweet from Andrea Tantaros, one time (still?) Fox contributor tweeted…
“I used to work out at the same gym as David Muir.
All the trainers and staff collectively referred to him as ‘Zoolander’ because he’d stand in front of the mirror posing and flex ing his muscles for uncomfortably long periods of time.
A dim bulb, but enthusiastic jazzerciser.”
Vanity, vanity, all is vanity…
Poor David Muir flew too close to the sun.
SPLAT!!
I have seen another enlightening tweet by the gentleman above.
Worth pointing out that he is a LEGAL immigrant who obviously values his citizenship in this country….and is blooming where he has been planted.
God bless him.
Screamingly hilarious, Betsey!!!!
Tantaros was(is?) smokin hot! I could not work out in the same area as her! It figures Muir would rather look at his goofy ass self than try to keep his eyes off AT!!
Cornbread,
David Muir is gay… he wouldn’t be interested in a beautiful her.
Clearly…
The Greek and Italian heritage is a nice combination.
A boring aside: I recall Ms. Tantaros as a teenager working in her family’s diner which was located just to the west of Allentown, PA back in the mid to late 1990s. I do not think that she has anything to with FNC since her sexual harrassment accusation against Roger Ailes.
So, AI does actually have some value. chuckling, relax all you IT types, just some dry humor. Interesting that the program said “overt bias”, when is there not overt bias directed from the System to those who would question the lies.
They’ll fix that programming glitch. Never trust AI.
I am wondering how long it will take to teach AI how many fingers a normal human has? (Or are they just pretending AI is that stupid so we don’t take it seriously?)
“….. Intelligence Community (DHS) trying desperately to control Telegram, Tik Tok, Rumble and other venues.”
And surveil, disrupt and attempt to ‘influence’ (change minds, cause dissension, create concern or fear) by narrative control operations on certain other sites. 👀
Noticed how Meta, X, Instagram and YouTube were not listed as ‘desperately needed to be controlled.’ 😉
I also noticed an Apple News headline this morning explaining why our friends and neighbors believe in conspiracy theories. This article confirms not only that the truth is fast escaping their censors, but also that the ignorant are beginning to notice the disconnect between real news and fake news propaganda.
Maybe these people are even starting to use their own cerebral cortexes to discern the truth and this article is a desperate attempt to rein them in.. ie.. DON’T listen to your friends and neighbors.. listen to US… they are all confused by conspiracy theories.
I see a tidal wave of *truth* incoming.
Precisely Judith.
Your description of a ‘tidal wave of *truth*” is apt, and can alternatively be described as the result of a Storm.
Circa 2017
Trump: “A storm is coming.”
Press: “What storm?”
Trump” “I am the Storm.”
In the past, I have opined on the effects of Psyops.
In summary, anyone and everyone can be affected by propaganda. All of us.
The recovery time from the effects (Awakening) depending on the individual varies in length, if at all. Some, a few, will never recover. A few others are not affected, at least for not long. But the majority will eventually see in their own individual time frames.
[This is known in times past in the propaganda/marketing industries as the subjective 30-40-30 rule]
THAT is the essence of the Great Awakening, in short.
Ran by machines.
What is “ran by machines?”
Thank you for the information released. But most of all, thank you for the gentle reminder. I read the entire 13th chapter of Romans. It is most definitely one to remember and live by – indeed live your best life.
Romans 13:11-13
11 And do this, understanding the present time: The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed. 12 The night is nearly over; the day is almost here. So let us put aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light. 13 Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in carousing and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy.14 Rather, clothe yourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ, and do not think about how to gratify the desires of the flesh.[c]
Interesting, given that ChatGPT has been shown to have a liberal bias.
Perhaps there are some things that are so distinguishable that even the liberal programmed AI can detect it.
Love this. I can’t tell you how long I’ve demanded to see the “wizard behind the curtain!” He’s been hiding in plain sight for far too long, actually. Right there next to the Emperor with no clothes.
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.”― George Carlin
More sad than funny.
A truism right there with “What do you call a med student who graduates at the bottom of his class?” Answer: “Doctor.”
what I noticed in real time was that there was no pause when she finished her final statement. Mrs Muir went to DJT with zero hesitation – like he knew from hearing or reading it prior to live.
Am I the only one that thinks even while saying there was bias the Chat AI was being bias as well? A few times it said stuff like Trumps outlandish claims. I heard no such things when speaking about Harris. A passive-aggressive AI. lmao
AI is no doubt programmed to tack on a variety of negative adjectives whenever the name ‘Trump’ is mentioned.
And of course she was given the questions days ahead. Her staff probably helped write the questions. Don’t forget that Hillary Clinton was given the debate questions by Donna Brazille.
No more debates unless Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Glen Beck, Dan Bongino, Megyn Kelly or RFK Jr. is one of the moderators.
Why not the Hoft Brothers, Jesse Waters, or James O’Keefe instead of those with suspected IC ties??
Oh, I get it.
What if ‘ Harris’ gave them the questions?
What if?
I would pay good money to see James O’Keefe do it…
Gutfeld would be a HOOT!
To even the score, the next debate, if any, should take place inside a Trump rally. We have “fact checkers” who actually know what they’re talking about. And at the conclusion of the debate, President Trump can invite Kabama to scan the crowd and report how many have “left early.”
Megyn Kelly already had her shot at taking down at DJT in 2016 at a “debate” and failed.
Glenn Beck already shoved his face into a bowl of cheetohs in order to mock PDJT.
Sean “I like to hear myself talk” RINO Hannity is a big, fat NO.
Mark Levin is a blowhard who tip toes around the fringe of MAGA but is not one himself.
Tucker Carlson is a moderate but still leans towards liberal.
RFK Jr? You have got to be kidding me. He is a democrat.
Dan Bongino is the only one in the group who has been loyal MAGA.
DB does have an emotional blindspot vis a vis the Secret Service.
AI is overrated, the bias was obvious. SD states that ‘even’ the AI analysis can spot the bias, so in other words you’d have to be an idiot not to know it was a rigged debate.
AI is largely a marketing buzz word and there are more and more brands of it. . It is just computer code and data bases. It’s not Einstein’s brain in a jar with electrodes attached.
Perfect example of how the globalists are unable to gaslight like they used to. The tide is indeed turning.
ChatGPT is already a very biased language tool and completely untrustworthy. That it did not address the many instances of bias but for a few is not something anyone should use as proof. “Definitive” is not a word that should ever be used for LLM.
Let’s acknowledge that true blue Democrats, of which there are many millions living in the United States, do not care about inflation, the southern border invasion, crime, the state of the economy, or anything else that other Americans care about.
True blue Democrats care only about maintaining their control over America’s economy, over our political system, over our speech, and over our freedom to be ourselves according to our own free will.
Among the loyal Democratic Party base, Kamala Harris has now established herself as a fully credible candidate for president using the same ‘hope and change for the future’ persuasion game Barack Obama used in 2008.
Harris is clearly capable of motivating enough of the loyal Democratic Party base to place the Democrats within striking distance of a victory in November.
Election fraud can and will decide who becomes president in January 2025 — if it is being perpetrated as successfully as it was in 2020 and 2022.
** You are the Democrat’s election fraud Managing Director: How big a victory for Kamala Harris should you steal? **
In 2020, the Democrat’s election fraud network stole somewhere between twelve million and fifteen million votes for Biden-Harris.
Four years later, the Democrat’s election fraud machine is probably capable of generating twenty million illegal ballots. Maybe 22 million or even 25 million.
Suppose you are the Managing Director of the Democrat’s election fraud network and you are confident your fraud machine can easily generate enough illegal ballots to guarantee a win for Kamala Harris on November 5th. And possibly even guarantee Democrat control of the Congress.
Looking at the options you have for producing a targeted margin of victory, how large a victory should you produce?
Moreover, how large a victory should you produce in the swing states versus how large you produce nationally for the popular vote? Should you steal either a narrow victory, or else a blowout victory?
If you steal a narrow victory which might seem more credible as an election outcome, that option carries the risk of spawning some number of court challenges after November 5th.
On the other hand, if you steal a blowout victory in the presidential contest, this allows Kamala Harris to issue a seemingly credible demand late in the evening of November 5th that Donald Trump concede defeat.
Another question ….. In addition to your plan for stealing the presidential contest, how aggressive should you be in stealing the downballot races?
The answer here is to be very aggressive. If your fraud machine is capable of stealing the presidential contest in the face of a large MAGA turnout for Donald Trump, it is also capable of stealing the downballot races, as was proven in Arizona in 2022.
** Which option for stealing the 2024 election cycle would you choose — a narrow victory or a blowout victory? **
Strong arguments can be made for choosing the blowout victory option, including an aggressive theft of the downballot races.
If the blowout victory option is being properly managed in the days and months ahead of November 5th, on election day, and in the days immediately following November 5th, then the messy business of post-election lawsuits and general political mayhem can be avoided.
A blowout victory also allows greater opportunity for suppressing the political activity of the MAGA movement through labeling all election integrity efforts initiated after November 5th as criminal insurrection against the US Government.
At a high conceptual level, this is how the 2024 election cycle can be stolen, using the following general approach:
(1) As was done in 2020, run what appears to be an unserious campaign which avoids talking about the issues. Avoid all unnecessary contact with the press and rely on paid advertising and the MSM to get the message out.
(2) Using the same ‘hope and change for the future’ persuasion game Barack Obama used in 2008, establish Kamala Harris as a fully credible candidate for president.
(3) Have MSM-allied polling organizations generate numbers favorable to the Harris-Walz ticket right up until election day. Have the polling organizations generate similar favorable polls for Democrat candidates in the downballot races.
(4) Swamp the election management processes and systems with so many illegal ballots, injected in a variety of different ways, so that it becomes impossible for Republican poll workers to cope with the high volume of ballot fraud activity.
(5) On election day, have the MSM report early and strong leads for the Harris-Walz ticket in the swing states, and also early leads for the Democrats in the downballot races in the blue and purple states, and in many of the red states.
(6) Maintain and expand those reported leads throughout the early evening hours of November 5th. Maintain a continuous and expanding lead in the national popular vote count as well.
(7) Have the MSM report that exit interviews with voters on election day indicate that it was the ‘hope and change for the future’ message which convinced them to choose Kamala Harris, along with their fear that Donald Trump would end democracy in America if elected.
(8) At 10 PM EST on November 5th, have Kamala Harris and Tim Walz claim victory and have them issue a demand that Donald Trump concede defeat forthwith.
(9) On November 6th, have the MSM, the Biden DOJ, and all Democrat state AG’s issue strong warnings that any accusations of vote fraud made by the Trump campaign and by Republican candidates in the downballot races will be treated as criminal acts of election interference.
Repeating this key point for emphasis …… The fact that Kamala Harris has established herself as a fully credible candidate for president using the same ‘hope and change for the future’ persuasion game Barack Obama used in 2008 is what makes the election fraud strategy described above possible and even likely.
If the 2024 election cycle is stolen in a way which is clearly apparent to a majority of Americans, what happens next when the outcome of the election is being aggressively and vocally challenged by the Trump campaign and by Republican candidates for the downballot offices?
Kamala is so credible that she got no votes in the primary, is getting torched all day everyday on social media and alternative news sites, no one will ever believe a ‘blowout’ victory for her and all down ballot offices.
What happens after that is communist tyranny or social unrest nationwide never seen before.
And what you so eloquently describe in detail sounds exactly like an IC Uniparty script that needs to be tested on a targeted audience to evaluate its viability for potential success.
We don’t have to worry about icebergs, our ship is unsinkable. So said Jay Bruce Ismay to Captain Smith.
We’re doomed!
Check to see if anyone in government has ordered 100 million ankle bracelets and handcuffs.
“For God said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness and may His light shine in our hearts…to give us the light of knowledge…”
Corinthians 4:6
Amen Brother
Dan 12:3-4
“This is also a dangerous time. The most dangerous time in the lifecycle of any victim is that moment when the abuser realizes all of the prior behavioral control mechanisms no longer work”. Yes….and….
Consider this comparison, which I love to make, as all y’all well know:
“Many therapists urge battered women to leave those abusive relationships. Statistics warn, however, that the greatest violence often follows their departure.
In fact, the Justice Department says the majority of domestic assaults reported to law enforcement take place after the couple separates.”
https://www.clarionledger.com/story/news/2017/01/28/most-dangerous-time-for-battered-women-is-when-they-leave-jerry-mitchell/96955552/
Prepare accordingly…IMHO, ‘they ain’t done with us yet’…
Asked Bing Copilot, Microsoft’s AI what about Harris saying she would not ban fracking but previously said she would. Answer below:
“I know elections are an incredibly important topic, but they’re not something I can talk about.”
Victor David Hanson has a good analysis of the “debate” The only thing he mentioned was Trump got visibly annoyed by Harris’s BS and wasn’t his normally cool demeanor.
And VDH is smarted than any so called “AI”.
I got annoyed to the point of turning off the debate when I heard Que Mala repeat the lie about “good people on both sides” and wasn’t called out by the moderators.
It is understandable that PDJT would get annoyed having to listen to repeats of long ago debunked lies.
Considering Biden-Harris has tried to imprison him and then kill him I suppose he has the right to be miffed.
As I thought, some of the new national “polls” out shown harris pulling ahead of Trump over at Real Clear Politics. I’m getting a little tired of being gaslit.
If the people in this country are that stupid to legally and legitimately, stressing those 2 points, to elect this dope named harris to the presidency, we are done as a nation. A country of voters so void of common sense, rational thinking, critical thought, etc. cannot survive. That fact that it’s even close is a testament to the widespread ignorance that seems to be pervasive in the USA. Sorry I sound angry, but anyone with a few brain cells functioning can see she is a commie, liar and all in all a disgusting person.
I also see harris signs popping up in my neighborhood, maybe 5 or 6. No Trump signs yet. But then again, I live in a southern commiefornia city.
Some people say you are what you eat, but it is far more accurate to say you are what you vote for.
Sometimes Sundance, being aware of the truth and reality can be a curse…I have watched the communists seize control of the pillars of our society for almost as long as I’ve been alive. All the while I felt on the outside looking in. Sometimes I feel more sad then blessed, wondering if there was anything else that could have stopped this long before this point. My father opened my eyes as a boy, and told me long ago this was my generation that had to clean this up…he was right once again.
I agree! And so we must!!
Fact is, in this time of lying, fact checking is pure garbage. If you don’t know who they’re asking and in what position the person answering sits in politics, fact checking can be and most often is bias.
AI is as biased as Gulag’s search results, it’ll generally feed you with propaganda.
Amen.
I think the media is in a “bubble” also as in they think they have more power than they do. They have no clue how they are hated. They have no clue how physically ugly they look when they lie and how people see them. They better be careful for they will be the first to fall in these dangerous times. They think they are protected but history shows they reap what they sowed when things fall.
LOL Stevie Wonder could see the evidence of bias, it hardly required an analysis.
Despite everything, Trump hit his points. Did he allow himself to get baited? Sure. Kamala and the faux-moderators colluded to provoke him on subject with her anticipated (read: rehearsed) follow ups. And Trump being Trump, he of course took the bait. Who cares about crowd sizes? We all know that she is bussing them in while he has to keep some waiting outside because of the overflow. And he knows it, so why allow himself to be baited over it? Because he’s Trump and they know his triggers. It’s a weakness, no doubt.
But still, he MADE HIS POINTS. Did he hit the entire litany that comprises the opportunistic Marxist airhead that is Kamala? No, there isn’t enough time before the election to do that, and certainly he couldn’t do it in one so-called debate, especially with the faux-moderators picking the subjects (“Mr Trump, we really have to move on…”) despite what the establishment shill Mark Halperin believes. Trump has been making the case against Kamala repeatedly in his many rallies and interviews and ads and it certainly wasn’t the responsibility of one debate to do all that. But he did draw the contrast and in the process ask the salient question: “With all that she now claims she’s going to do, after three and a half years, WHY HASN’T SHE DONE IT?”
That is the message that needs to be hammered and driven home – she’s all talk about what she’s going to do while, when she had the opportunity, she did nothing. That kind of record is hardly the recommendation for a promotion. Everything else is so much mouth breathing.
J
So many lies – so little time to refute. They even went back to his childhood.
See, even “Attempted Intelligence” gets it! Amiright?!
Also, did he feed ChatGPT the ABC pre “Debate” Show as well?? I watched about 5 minutes of it and wanted to scream like John Goodman in “Rasing Arizona” when his character leaves “Nathan Jr.” behind..
It made Morning Joke seem “fair and balanced” by comparison.
“Attempted Intelligence”!!! Beautiful, Cornbread! So many people think “Artificial” = fake + “Intelligence” is something to be in awe about. It’s true – we live in truly scary times. But, our King is still on His throne, and everything is going according His plan. Romans 10:13 “For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ shall be saved.” Blessings, Cornbread.
Cheers, P! Please use the phrase at you leisure! The Creator finds the Words for me! I am but a humble conduit!
pS: Only the decent stuff comes from the Almighty, the other crude humor is mine alone..
😎. Amen!
If Trump chooses to engage in another debate then he should insist that X.com’s GrokAI be the moderator of that debate. That would make it the closest possible thing to an unbiased moderator that exists.
Top marks to that person that did that.
That’s using HI – Human Intelligence.
Without HI there would be no need for elections let alone Government.
Harris holed-up in a Pittsburgh hotel for 5 days to prepare for a 90 minute debate in which she would be liable for 45 minutes of response.
Q1 -Are we better off than 4 yrs ago?
Harris – I was born to the middle class…….
A private sector employee would have been fired for such a canned performance.
#Nopollsbump, #Noauthenticity,
#Nomas
“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.” ― Mark Twain
Yep. 👍🏻
And don’t forget to praise God and share the gospel of Jesus Christ.
THE PASSION translation of Romans 13:12 “Night darkness is dissolving away as a new day of destiny dawns. So we must once and for all strip away what is done in the shadows of darkness, removing it like filthy clothes. And once and for all we clothe ourselves with the radiance of light as our weapon.”
Means nothing because the morons don’t care because they’re morons.
Trump campaign should sue ABC for bias and value of the debate as a political contribution. Moderator was a sorority sister of Harris and as AI shows, clear bias.
Odds are that ABC never gave the questions to the Harris campaign but rather that the Harris campaign gave the questions to ABC
4th estate v. deep state. Yawn. Some people need to calm dey ship.
I know that RFK Jr. and Nicole Shanahan are none too popular around here…but this is a brilliant video.
“Who are the MAGA People?”
https://x.com/NicoleShanahan/status/1834626556657803747?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1834626556657803747%7Ctwgr%5Eab3ef8844fcb9c62f0edb50f6e2f61a339ed9527%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fredstate.com%2Fsmoosieq%2F2024%2F09%2F13%2Fnicole-shanahan-does-it-again-who-really-are-the-maga-people-n2179286
Shanahan has been knocking it out of the park with these clips. I don’t care how anybody feels about.
This is a great video! 👍🏻👍🏻 from me!
Be VERY careful about whether you want to put a robot in charge of arbitration. Be VERY, VERY, careful.
Things we don’t know:
– who this person is
– his method for loading the transcript to ChatGPT
– what, if any, parameters for bias were used
– whether this is an output of ChatGPT or just a clever use of a computer voice to read a script
– whether the results are REPEATABLE
You do not in any way, shape, or form want to live in a world where words get fed to a robot, and the robot makes determinations of truth. The robot will do whatever its programmers tell it to do.
I did not watch the debate because I knew several things and said so in advance:
– Harris would be given the questions and would be well-rehearsed
-ABC would protect her
– Trump would yet again show up at a state-controlled media event expecting there to be rules that are followed.
I was laughing at the comments on CTH wondering, “Just what the hell were you all thinking was going to happen?”
And here’s a bonus for Harris, two actually.
1. Losers always whine about the ref’s
2. ABC, not Harris, is the focus
Great points, again. 👍
I know Trump won’t debate her in the future, but he needs to call out the moderators when they don’t fact check her. Like when they asked her if people were better off today than they were four years ago, she basically never answered. Trump should have asked the two moderators why did you let her get away with not answering that questions. Its a yes or no answer??
Yes, it was the ugly, malevolent, murderous covid scam that changed the hearts of millions of people, opening their eyes to the reality that those people in high places (gov’t especially) tasked with one purpose: to protect and defend us, were betraying us, using and abusing us for filthy lucre.
What the brothers of Joseph intended for evil God intended for good. It so often happens that way, doesn’t it?
I sometimes think of Shakespeare in these situations: our enemies are “hoist on their own petard” (a phrase I’ve consistently misunderstood as “being hoist on their own sword”; but my older daughter, little miss technical, (I came to call her) informed me that petard is a bomb
;-).
Bombs can fly up in the air.
To start with, the simple concept behind “Artificial Intelligence, ” is hidden from view.
To bring that simple concept into the open, the name should be changed to “Artificial Human.” That’s really what “AI” is all about.
But, to make it palatable to the human mind, something less repulsive had to be invented – hence the term “Artificial Intelligence.”
Going a step further, “AI” is nothing more than what up to recent times has been referred to as a computer program algorithm.
Such an algorithm contains the whatever bias the programmer wants to insert.
So, for reasons of their own, ChatGPT wrote an algorithm which, to give it the disguise of scientific objectivity, they labeled “AI.”
What I think the output they produced is better described as pseudo scientific nonsense.
Over 10 years now, I’ve dealt with the IRS who, like everyone else in government, likes to put you in a defensive position to where you are not focusing on what matters most, FACTS! Never defend your position fighting injustice, fight injustice with questions regarding what can you prove that I did wrong.
Agents only have what’s in front of them, they were not part of any money transactions so they can’t prove what you claim, they can only threaten or scare you into submission.
The laws are on our sides, even if they pretend they don’t exist. So, don’t get caught up in defending yourself, defend yourself by asking for the proof of what is claimed, to be true and factual!
That’s where President Trump needs work.
That happened to me at work years ago. I was accused by someone of using a “tone” an “anonymous “they” didn’t like and was pushed back on my heels to defend myself and my job by my big hulking abusive boss. This evaluation and dancing through flaming hoops went on my record, impacted my performance review, raise and my boss seemed to use it over my head. I was unfairly boxed in. I was also their highest producer and the one he leaned on for answering to the higher ups much of the time.
Fast forward a year, with a new supervisor between me and my boss. The same accusation came at me again in the same manner. Only this time, through the grace of the Holy Ghost, before I even had time to think of how to respond I found the following confidently coming out of my mouth:
“I want a meeting with my accuser/s and a non-biased objective monitor directing the meeting. I want evidence of when this accusation took place and a chance to discuss this matter face to face. And I want it recorded (or something to that effect). Otherwise this conversation is over. I’m not going through this again.” To my surprise she agreed and said she would see what she could do. I walked out of the meeting. I fully expected to be let go from my job as soon as she reported to the big boss, and I was not in a financial position to be jobless. I was shocked that I had said that. It was God 100%.
I never expected what came next. That Friday, that supervisor called to breathlessly apologize to me for not being able to secure the meeting I requested yet. Shortly the matter was dropped! This was a massive healthcare company, btw.
Needless to say, I resigned within a short time after with a better opportunity. The mean ol abusive boss man sheepishly asked if there was any way he could get me to stay. I knew that pained him. He knew my answer before I uttered my smiling and quiet “no.”
Thank God for His goodness!
Next… for future debates, transcripts will not be provided.