Throughout the trial the prosecution refused to outline the underlying crime that President Trump was guilty of violating.
Without telling the defendant what crime they committed, the defense did not know what point of specific law to refute. Then, in the closing arguments by the prosecution, the Manhattan District Attorney finally stated the crime that frames their case against President Trump. A federal campaign violation.
This context of surprise attack LAWFARE is egregious in the extreme because throughout the trial the court refused to permit testimony from expert defense witnesses, including testimony from the Federal Election Commission, that federal campaign violations never took place.
The court previously said the defendant is not being charged with federal campaign violations because this is a state case; ergo no FEC testimony is valid. Then in the closing arguments, the state says the underlying case which frames the state prosecution are FEC violations of law.
Jonathan Turley writes an op-ed in The Hill sharing the extreme nature of the judicial breach that has taken place. This is unmitigated Lawfare in the extreme and the American people can see it clearly.
(Via The Hill) – […] going into the deliberations, the court allowed the jury to be told repeatedly that there were federal campaign violations committed by Trump. That is not true. Putting aside that the federal government found no basis to impose a civil fine, let alone bring a criminal charge, the court barred a legal expert who could have shown that no such violation occurred. The jury does not know that. Instead, the judge allowed them to be repeatedly told a false fact that could make it difficult for anyone to acquit.
However, the instructions then went in for the kill and turned the jury deliberations into a canned hunt.
Consider just a few highlights from the curious aspects of these deliberations.
First, the judge has ruled that the jury does not have to agree on what actually occurred in the case. Merchan ruled that the government had vaguely referenced three possible crimes that constitute the “unlawful means” used to influence the election: a federal election violation, the falsification of business records, and a tax violation. The jurors were told that they could split on what occurred, with four jurors accepting each of the three possible crimes in a 4-4-4 split. The court would still consider that a unanimous verdict so long as they agree that it was in furtherance of some crime. (READ MORE)
The judge refused to give the jury a written copy of the 55-pages of juror instructions because the corrupt judge wants the jury to keep coming back to him for guidance. The judge wants to coach the jury to their guilty conclusion. [SEE INSTRUCTIONS HERE]
Additionally, the judge is doing everything possible to make jury deliberations extend as long as possible in order to create the impression of guilt which assists the lawfare narrative. Everything happening in this courtroom is corrupt and a bastardized abuse of the courts, ie Lawfare.
LAWFARE: Acting Justice Merchan is requiring Trump to remain in the courthouse while the jury deliberates. There is no reason he couldn’t wait at his home – no reason other than to punish him. pic.twitter.com/qScGMIy69G
— @amuse (@amuse) May 30, 2024
Trump’s defense was not told what the underlying charge was that makes this case a felony until after they rested.
Megyn Kelly is on fire about this miscarriage of justice.
Credit: @MegynKellyShow pic.twitter.com/YDMsPe6nYC— Big Fish (@BigFish3000) May 29, 2024
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1796233271879016820
Great new ad from the Trump campaign highlighting the number of people, from across the political spectrum, who see what is happening, and are horrified at the clear targeting of a political opponent!
Turley may lean right but he is definitely NOT a conservative, and he is only one of MANY, who are calling out this judge and this entire process!
Turley has no standing, just like the rest of us.
Before a conviction: no standing because no violation has yet occurred
After a conviction: Laches meaning now you’re too late!
❣️
do you think the judge cares…….. he has a mission and a big payday if successful.
already
These corrupt asshats are so blanton they’re going to set off a public backlash they never anticipated
Without question. The backlash continues to grow.
Beyond the obvious, I see so much more is actually wrong. The judge knew there was no case and I suspect is following direction. He’s not a stupid person. He was sharp enough to catch the Trump lawyer’s jab at the jury by saying “imprisoning” in his closing remarks in a split second.
I’m not saying he’s a “hostage” but I am saying he appears to be intentionally throwing this case by going so far over the top. There’s no way this survives appeal.
But I can’t draw any conclusions about what he expects to happen next.
We know there have been meetings with secret service. Just as there were meetings between the FBI and secret service. (And let’s be clear on the whole raid discussion. Yes, the FBI always carries weapons but not around a secret service protectee! That’s not something to negotiate. Further, authorization to use deadly force is, to my knowledge, always ASSUMED when police carry weapons. Why is that in a search warrant at all?… I digress.
Is the secret service planning to “give up” their protectee to the custody of Riker’s?
I think it’s CLEAR they don’t care if they lose on appeal. What’s not clear is if they plan to take Trump into custody where “things happened….”
We can also look at PDJT’s recent history with appeals in the NY state judicial system. That path is full of minefields too. It’s entirely possible, even with multiple appealable claims, the court won’t take the appeal. Also, there’s the reality of no bond during appeal being a possibility and I’ll lose my bet on the prison cell thing.
I continue to believe this is all theater as part of a larger mission to defeat our goal of MAGA for the next 12 years, at least. PDJT is key to that mission. Like with Covid, it’s tricky. Controlling masses of humans always is.
As outlined previously, the judge has already violated SCOTUS precedent when he said “4-4-4” is unanimous. This could go immediately to SCOTUS.
All they want for a win is to be able to label Trump as a “Convicted Felon.” They will run with this all the way to the election, even it is overturned on appeal (it will for sure). The Mockingbird Media will make sure this term is used and highlighted.
Democrats and leftists (I repeat myself) never learn from their mistakes. In exactly the same way “banned from Twitter/Youtube” was a badge of honor, becoming a convicted felon as a POTUS candidate will only get him elected “more bigly.” And let’s be serious. Democrat strategists KNOW this and are screaming to high heaven that what’s going on is only making things worse. So people in control over the party politics KNOW.
But the IC doesn’t really care about politics or politicians. Ken Paxton is a threat and now we KNOW what happened. It wasn’t just a bunch of RINOs. It’s was the IC behind it and the RINOs were following orders. If they want Trump taken out, they will see to it that it happens by any means necessary.
Calling Trump a convicted felon on TV isn’t going to do anything less that win more support for Trump.
They are MORE serious than that.
I thought that too. If it requires the Supreme Court to “save” Trump, then the Lawfare has worked. All the vilification thrown at the S.C. recently will play well amongst the stupid crowd.
If Trump does get sent to prison, even temporarily during appeal, I honestly think he would be better protected by the inmates than by the prison guards. Don’t know how Secret Service detail fits into it, unless they’re going to be standing guard outside his cell and following him around everywhere like they do right now. Pretty sure there’s never been a SS protectee in prison before so that’s likely why they were meeting with the prison people to hash it out, just in case it happens.
Ray Blanton,disgraced ex-governor of Tennessee?
lol. I think he meant “wanton.”
So much that was wrong with this case!
You need to know the charges
You will be judged by a jury of your peers – I hope the prosecution’s effort to make President Trump out to be a racist will backfire so badly as the members of the jury see how they themselves are being used to help railroad an innocent person –
then the jury members are pressured so blatantly, like being told how to vote, that they don’t know any better about how a jury is supposed to arrive at a verdict!
If my understanding is correct he needs just 1 juror to hold out on not guilty and he’s clear
I read yesterday that the ” judge” will remove any juror that doesn’t join, making a hung jury impossible.
According to Dershewitz he has the power to do this. It is almost never done, but if he can get the other jury members to claim that the juror isn’t “negotiating”, he could replace them.
If a juror has evaluated the evidence and has a firm opinion on the verdict, he doesn’t need to “negotiate.”
However, the jurors could get rid of him by claiming he talked about on-line research, news reports, or discussions with friends.
The reason we get hung juries is because the jurors have taken various positions, and no amount of arguing, persuasion or negotiation will get to unanimity.
That juror would be a hero, then go into witness protection, not commandeered by the FBI though.
Federal Witness Protection is ran by the Marshal Service
The FBI managed to compromise the secret service enough to stand down in Mar-A-Lago. I expect they will stand down if guilty is the verdict. The US Marshals services are not immune from this level of compromise.
Federal Marshals are just as politicized as the FBI IMO. Don’t let the word marshal snow you. It’s still part of DOJ.
don’t hold your breath…….. they have been advised what to do and just make it look good. The judge the jury the DA all New York scumbags capable of any type of wrongdoing.
They know a conviction would be overturned. The point is to put President Trump in jail.
No, the point is to give him the label “convicted felon”. They all know this kangaroo court will be overturned on appeal… but that will take time. Meanwhile, Biden and his minions will be able to shout from the rooftops that President Trump is a convicted felon. Also, the D’s in congress will try to pass a law specifically to exclude President Trump from election because…. he is a convicted felon!
Am vaguely worried squishy uniparty republicans would capitulate and go along with this also.
Same here!
I think you are correct which the lawfare buds would start lawsuits to disqualify President Trump from the Nov ballot again or even get the rinos in the RNC to pull a fast one and not nominate him
It would not take much time if they put him in Prison – That’s why they wont do that… If President Trump goes to Prison they will be in ruins and the Supreme court would act right away
This^^^^^^
you hit the nail on the head but left out a couple more GOP guys to retire early and let the House slip back to Nancy and Hakim.
True. The rsults of any appeal would likely be presented post-November 2024.
Let the Dems attempt to do just that. The Dems are hoping that the majority of people are unaware that since the Office of the President is created by the COTUS in Article II, the only legitimate way to bar convicted felons from holding the office would be to amend the COTUS. Imposition of a term limit on the POTUS was set by the ratification of the 22nd Amendment.
Joe Biden and his goons are communist trash and they must be defeated!
actually they are Islamomarxists
whatever label = evil pos
The New York bastion no longer belongs to these bastards. The wrath of hell awaits them outside their clique.
F around with an innocent man’s life, you are going to find out. FAFO!!!!
Suppose that one or two honest jurors decide to stand firm on principal in the face of intense peer pressure and vote ‘not guilty’. How long will the judge keep the jury imprisoned until the last holdout for ‘not guilty‘ caves in? A week? Two weeks? A month?
I’m praying. God who is above all can use their evil intentions for His good.
DD
Panic in DC!!!!
Make up a crime that never occured from another jurisdiction (federal), case, new rules, violate all legal decorum and civil rights violations under color of law (18 USC 242 & 242), bring in psyop operators to falsely report and intimidate, seal of building and exclude those who may tell the truth.
Beria could not have performed this better in our system.
Why?
“The need for control is a reaction to fear.”
I am tired about reading how the Lawfare is being conducted. Informative and serves to open more eyes about what is happening to our country, but obvious.
WHAT WILL BE DONE ABOUT IT? HOW CAN IT BE STOPPED AND THE TABLES TURNED?
DJT has said that we can never let this happen to our country again… and all that implies. The war for justice and reformation is just beginning.
MAGA!!
Thank you JT for breaking it down to its horrendous core and to SD for reporting it.
Remove PDJT and force Putin to defend his people with a tactical weapon: we are truly on the precipice. If certain sources are correct, US/NATO/Nazis have disabled 2 of Putins 3 advanced warning systems and their goal is take out the 3rd. Then what? He’ll have no notice and vulnerable. Has he really moved 11 subs into range?
God help us, all of us.
Joe Stalin is working for the EU/British royals….. they want the resources of Russia. That’s precisely why he is attacking Russia. He’s a traitor and risking American lives for the old Royals that wanted to enslave our ancestors!
The UK has had a major weed up its butt with Russia for two centuries. The globalist rape of the Motherland started shortly after the fall of the Soviet Union but was put on hold by the ascendence of Vladimir Putin. The One Worlders want Vlad out of the way so that they can finish the job.
The evil democrats just want a felony conviction. They do not care if it is appealed much later.
Norm Eisen. Barack Obama. Mary McCord. Andrew Weismann. Hillary. Susan Rice. The face of Evil.
I sure hope there is a civil rights lawsuit against everyone involved in this farce at some point.
Make that TWO lawsuits, the other for that ridiculously SLANDEROUS election ad that Biden’s handlers are pushing wherever they can.
As if a lawsuit is going to solve anything!
We Know it! — They know we know it! – THEY DON’T GIVE A S**T cuz they hold ALL the cards it seems.
This old geezer wants to know what the hell *I* can do??? Pissed/frustrated and VERY ANGRY.
I have lived way too long in this great country of ours to watch it become a sh*t hole for my kids, grands & great grands.
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Everyone awake and pissed off is now an unstoppable force. DJT has forced their hand and unmasked the enemy within. They will be defeated!
MAGA!!
I understand the Supreme Court could step into this proceeding because it is so bad.
WHY DOESN’T SCOTUS STOP THIS EMBARRASSMENT TO AMERICA!
Maybe they will wait for a verdict why risk the fallout if they don;t have to .
Because they are pu$$ies.
Exactly
I thought about it and deleted the part of this comment that used a term to describe your mental capacity.
The Supreme Court can’t “step-in”. Read the Constitution and you’ll learn the areas they have original jurisdiction (even that they just don’t “step-in”). Through the appellate process, the Supreme Court becomes the final step of the journey. The Supreme Court only hears a very small percentage of cases that request their intervention.
The key is a party much request the Supreme Court to hear their matter as either a case brought under the Court’s original jurisdiction or after exhausting other appeal methods.
Statements like this are ridiculous and do nothing to advance discussions. Justice Alito doesn’t sit around watching Fox News to find matters to get the Court involved in, that’s essentially what your statement is saying the Court does.
Gore v. Bush says you are wrong.
Now apologize to Grumpy.
There was an appeal from the FL Supreme Court in that case.
Yes, and it all occurred in a matter of a few weeks!
“On December 8, the Florida Supreme Court had ordered a statewide recount of all undervotes, over 61,000 ballots that the vote tabulation machines had missed. The Bush campaign immediately asked the U.S. Supreme Court to stay the decision and halt the recount.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore#:~:text=On%20December%208%2C%20the%20Florida,decision%20and%20halt%20the%20recount.
All done within 30 days of the election!
The Supreme Court can actually do something when they want to!
You should read this (below). It references SCOTUS “stepping in” (by invite) to “solve” the 2000 presidential election, i.e, “acting to preserve American democracy from an imminent threat” … empowered reportedly by the Judiciary Act of 1789.
https://x.com/marklevinshow/status/1795617859869061334
The “invite” was the SCOTUS granting of the appeal from the FL Supreme Court by Bush. The FL court had ordered a state-wide recount, and Bush argued that there was no way to finish it by the Electoral College deadline in the Constitution. SCOTUS agreed to hear the case on an expedited basis.
Perhaps someone with a legal background could flesh out how SCOTUS would inject itself into the NY state court system to right an alleged wrong in this case.
SCOTUS appeared to not get involved in state affairs during the Covid op and the stolen election even to settle disputes among states. Different events but same guy, PDJT, is involved here. Always willing to learn. 🙂
They can’t, Courts intervene in ripe controversies between parties.
Could you imagine the chaos if judges could insert themselves into whatever they wanted? And you think it’s bad now.
You seem to be overly motivated to keep the Supreme Court out of the public lynching of the President who nominated three of it’s newest members!
I think the Supreme Court can do whatever they are motivated to do with this.
I think the Supremes will do whatever they jolly well want. However, we the people, don’t forget, have no standing in fraudulent election matters for our own president.
The normal route to appeal would first be to the NY Supreme Court -Appellate Division either emergency now or after verdict, then to the NY Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals is the highest court. (Yes, the names don’t make sense.)
Then an appeal from the NY Court of Appeals to SCOTUS, arguing violations of Trump’s rights under the US Constitution.
An analogy may help. The court is in one sense an inanimate entity, like a hospital. It is in another sense comprised of judges, who actively “administer justice,” like a hospital is comprised of doctors, who actively “administer healthcare.” But, like a hospital, it can’t go out and do this on its own initiative. By design, it cannot function in this capacity. Help must be sought within by applicants. That is its nature. It cannot proactively go out and right wrongs. It doesn’t have that capacity. Just like a hospital can’t go out and treat gunshot victims on the street. And individual judges cannot do this on their own, either. Their power comes from their collective body.
Maybe a better analogy is a vending machine. It just sits, until activated, by putting a quarter in. A court sits, until a petition for relief is filed within. (Or an appeal is transferred from another court.). Otherwise, it sits.
I don’t know if this is helpful at all. But it is also why courts can be ignored (for example by Biden). Courts’ main weakness is they have no independent enforcement power. They don’t have an enforcement arm. Rather, people who hold judgments that aren’t being complied with must again seek redress in the courts by asking for enforcement orders that they then must take to an enforcer entity, like a sheriff or police officer or in the Supreme Court’s case, the Department of Justice.
IIRC, the judge did instruct them that all twelve had to agree there was a conspiracy between Trump and Cohen to commit one of these crimes.
It takes two to make a conspiracy, and the testimony of a co-conspirator (even an unindicted one), is insufficient to convict. The co-conspirator’s testimony needs corroboration.
I think that’s why the jury wanted Pecker’s testimony read back. The prosecution claimed Pecker corroborated the existence of a conspiracy.
Yes, all 12 have to agree that an underlying crime was committed. BUT, the judge told them they did NOT have to agree on what that underlying crime was. The jury can be split, evenly or unevenly on which of the 3 “crimes” were committed that led to the federal “crime” that Trump supposedly committed. You know, the “crime” that the FEC and DOJ both previously declined to prosecute because they found NO crime had been committed. Yeah, that one.
I was thinking (yeah I know a first for everything). When judges and prosecutors fail to adhere to a defendant’s rights, they typically infringe on fundamental civil rights, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to legal representation, the right to be informed of charges and have an opportunity to present a defense, the presumption of innocence, the protection against self-incrimination, and the right to equal protection under the law. These infringements undermine the integrity of our justice system and erode public trust.
To address these critical issues, I believe it is essential for President Trump to pass a federal statute that withdraws judicial and prosecutorial immunity in cases of proven misconduct.
This statute would allow for civil action to be taken by those harmed, ensuring that victims of judicial and prosecutorial overreach have a means of redress. By holding judges and prosecutors accountable through civil penalties, we can promote adherence to constitutional rights, enhance the fairness of legal proceedings, and restore confidence in the justice system.
Thoughts?
That’s a fleshed-out version of “loser pays”, and a good idea.
President can’t pass a statute – that would be congress, not an executive power,
Thank you. You know you’re right. I do recall studying Article I Section 7 in Con Law.
My point wasn’t that he cast a vote in either chamber of Congress. Rather he proposes legislation and lobbies for Congress to provide him an enrolled measure. Which he can then sign with a full box of pretty memento pens.
I can only wonder if you missed considering the merit of my broader point by my failure to properly articulate the role of the President found in Article I sec. 7.
I would truly welcome learning about those thoughts.
This is what eventually happened In Great Britain. And that is why there are less frivolous lawsuits.
I actually think this is the direction that we need to go in.
Our country is young and still has room to grow.
The objective is to get a guilty verdict no matter how. They then have President Trump convicted and then that is the platform to keep the TDS folks all hyped and mad and argue he is Guilty!!!
Psalm 35:7-8 NKJV
For without cause they have hidden their net for me in a pit,
Which they have dug without cause for my life.
[8] Let destruction come upon him unexpectedly,
And let his net that he has hidden catch himself;
Into that very destruction let him fall.
Amen
Joe Biden wants a conviction so bad so he can say there is no way he will debate a convicted felon.
A lot of this has to do with Hunter Biden’s legal woes that are popping even as this event takes place. Hunter’s trial for the gun violation starts soon. Biden had to go talk to his daughter-in-law who took the pistol from the crackhead (with whom she was having an affair) and whipping it into a dumpster outside a convenience store that was across the street from a high school. So far, no OBSTRUCTION charges have been filed concerning that incident. It is a big embarrassment, like that plea deal that went south that broke about the time Fani Willis filed her RICO indictment in Georgia.
Found in the bin… 🙁
Both Texas and California have 40% approval for secession.
Since the constitution is rubbish now I think it could be done with minimal hassle.
And stop pretending that a Trump admin can fix anything on the domestic side.
Is there no honest appeals court in New York? Criminal Law 101 must not have been required in the lawless school where Merchan got his JD (for him, it stands for Just Dumb). Never in the history of real law has there been a situation where jurors were allowed to pick one from an a la carte menu to say I choose guilty on plan A but you can choose any plan you want but it must be prefaced with guilty!
Apparently, the New York judicial system is okay with all of this. The Federales, too. Nothing has shown us, the American people, just how corrupt our judicial system is then this illegal persecution of PDJT. Michele Obama was ashamed of America? I’ll one-up you.
A Game of Thorns!!!
The ONLY reason this “trial” has a chance of being successful in any form at all, even as a so-called “moral” victory for the evil Dimwits, is because of the vast number of unabashed idiots running free in this country right now.
About 30 minutes ago I was picturing a herd of evil-idiot leftists as I read a (tongue-in-cheek) sign posted in my favorite mechanic’s shop: “Unattended children will be sold as slaves.” Would I not LOVE to do that with every childminded leftist I could lay my eyes on. Or even think about.
Me, too, but only if we can remove their tongues first so whoever buys them doesn’t have to listen to their commie BS whining all the time. OTOH, perhaps a few beatings would teach them not to speak unless spoken to, like they used to do with slaves?
And…no intelligent observer of the proceedings is the least bit surprised by Merchan’s blatantly egregious, personally malevolent, and politically motivated legal attack on PDJT.
Clearly, the Dems have concluded that the potentially compounded value of blasting PDJT as a “convicted felon” and possibly incarcerating him exceeds the shame of the case being rudely overturned upon appeal after the election. Moreover, they may be terribly mistaken about the potential harm to PDJT, but they have been all-in with this strategy for too long to change course now. Staubach’s pass to Pearson has been thrown and is in the air.
Anticipating the certainty of a conviction, Mark Levin is encouraging the Trump defense team to request an emergency appeal to the SCOTUS. However, the SCOTUS could easily insist that the usual appeals process be exhausted prior to its accepting the request, as is usually done, which would support the plot to damage PDJT prior to the election.
https://scnr.com/article/mark-levin-advises-trumps-lawyers-to-appeal-to-scotus-if-verdict-is-guilty_d9ffe5d41df111ef9c930242ac1c0002
This battle has degenerated into personal combat of the most vicious kind. This is the state of our country today, and deeper, lengthier tears of the national fabric are highly likely to be fast approaching.
Edit for spelling.
Staubach to Pearson.
The classic of classics!
It appears what you posit is already happening and, if I’m reading the room right, patriots don’t like it much.
The America I held dear generations ago is but a distant memory. Almost like another place. No almost, exactly like another place. Sad.
Well if it’s all out in the open, who’s gonna call it?
The minute there was no crime identified there should have been no trial.
Oh, I thought it was a stage show!
I don’t care how you get there (investigate, have a trial, etc.), but the results will be this.
The SCOTUS can see this same show. The real citizens, can see it, too.
So, will this generate another civil war or another world war?
MANUFACTURED OUTCOME.
This whore has been beat to death. A 6th grader who has 2 years of grade school civics, could tell you this.
You don’t have to be a adjunct constitutional law professor at the university of Chi…
Wait bad example.
No rule of law, no borders, no national defense, no nation.
The whole national election is just a formality, that will be dispensed with here shortly.
Found in the bin… 🙁
“You must convict him so we can tell you what’s in it.” Nancy pelosi probably.
From Turley’s article:
“Then came the closing arguments. Around the country, it is standard for the government to go first with a closing to allow the defense to respond. The government is then given the privilege of a rebuttal after the defense rests. In New York, the defense must go first, giving the government free rein over its closing with no risk of contradiction from the defense. With the exception of objections, any abusive or improper arguments are left to the judge to address.”
Wrong thread.
Mother fornicators…..
I wrote this on THCTH in 08/21/2020……I’ve been beating this drum on here and other sites for years….I’m glad that people are finally recognizing the Cancer is plaguing our Republic…..This is the repost and look at where we are today….
We are a Republic run by corrupt Lawyers and a corrupt Judiciary……
Virtually all of the exposed corruption at the FBI/DOJ and other Bureaucracies has been and
continues to be willfully committed by Un-elected corrupt Bureaucrat Lawyers…..Comey, Paige, Rosenstein, McCabe, Wray, Clinesmith, Mueller etc are all Lawyers…..
Essentially, D.C Law-Firms write the Legislation that the Lawyer politicians pass as “Bills”…..Most Lobbyist are Lawyers…..
Almost 50% of Congress are Lawyers……Most of those same Lawyers are connected to one of the D.C Law-Firms…..This includes Bill Barr…….
95% of D.C voted for Hillary Clinton…….This would include the D.C Lawyers……..
Law-Firms overwhelming donate to Democrats…It’s not even close……
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are both corrupt Lawyers….
Hunter Biden is a corrupt Lawyer…..
Politically connected Lawyers protect other Politically connected Lawyers regardless of Party affiliation……This is what you’re seeing play out today in real time…..
Corrupt Lawyers and activist Judges have brought our Republic to its knees…..
Getting President Trump re-elected is priority One…
Addressing the corrupt Law profession and the corrupt Judicial should be priority Two….
Does Jonathon not think Lucca Brazzi hasn’t already been to the jurors houses to deliver a fish wrapped in a newspaper. Come on they have been out and about for 5 days. heck Joe Biden and Hillary have prolly paid them a visit too to get the deal done. You trust the jurors….from New York….hahahahah they have to make it look complicated as part of the Kibuki. This is a totally correographed play and the juorors have definately been comprimized. How long do the scumbags get away with these bogus trials and indictments. Civil unrest will be inevitable if this keeps up.
There won’t be a hung jury because the Judge has refused to dismiss the alternate jurors. If one remains obdurate, he or she is replaced to get a verdict, simple as that.
Megyn Kelly is spot on:
https://x.com/BigFish3000/status/1795954928004796564?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1795954928004796564%7Ctwgr%5E1f03e525954437ef4f8d3792a933b040da0a9980%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconservativetreehouse.com%2Fblog%2F2024%2F05%2F30%2Fjonathan-turley-deconstructs-the-specifics-of-the-lawfare-witch-hunt-in-new-york-city%2F
Goldman Weissman Eisen Elias Tribe …aka the LawFare 5…..Same people who were in on Russia hoax… Know I know why Hitler did what he did …….Tribe members …..Sorry but its true these are bad peo0le for America…
Regardless of a Guilty or Not Guilty verdict, the trail has achieved its goal.
Force PDJT, to be confined to a courtroom for weeks on end, the goal has been achieved with possibly another court case to begin as soon as this ends, and this case has been so flawed if an appeal is needed it should be a given to be overturned.
The false conviction of Pres Trump in this lawfare miscarriage of justice trial will ensure his overwhelming victory in November, even if he is sitting in a jail cell. Anything less and the gloves will come off.
trying to listen to FOX but Shannon Brean is on and sounds like a chatty Kathy doll. If she is the smartest of the bunch..at least the blonds then FOX needs a change quickly…
“However, the instructions then went in for the kill and turned the jury deliberations into a canned hunt.”
Paging Kristi Neom.
Like I said before, if the purpose of lawfare is for “media consumption intended manipulate public opinion”, then why is Trump in real danger of being convicted in one of these kangaroo trials?
That quote in the image above is completely wrong.
The media manipulation is merely a secondary effect.
The purpose of lawfare is to destroy a person using corrupt actors in the legal system, with the goal of exhausting a target’s resources and ultimately securing a conviction.
Trump guilty on all counts.
How much sense does that quote make now? Zero sense.
The goal was to convict Trump in one or more of these corrupt rigged trials, a goal which they succeeded in spades.
He’s going to be sentenced on a NY State felony conviction.
This is not merely for “show” on MSNBC or for their audience
And he can’t pardon himself if elected – it’s a state law conviction.
Lawfare is to destroy political enemies, exhaust their resources, and send them to prison.
Not for the media.
Zzzzz….
Perhaps, when this is all over, they will crucify Jonathan Turley upside down.
There is no lack of jacks to wear the boots, is there?
To paraphrase the movie, Jaws: We’re gonna need a lot more rope!
THE SPEED of the river’s current has grown frighteningly… warning us of a narrow channel ahead – likely we’re gonna hit heavy white water rapids and the now growing roar of a huge water falls is less than reassuring… anyone want extra rain gear?
Oh and FJB!!
This is not the behavior of a constructional republic or the America we once knew. If we fail to accept this vital fact and act in some useful objective and collective way, it’s the final nail in the national coffin we permitted the left to build for us.
When Trump is convicted there will be people in the streets celebrating across the country. The only thing that would please them more is if he was assassinated. The left is being exposed more and more each day.