Yeah sure. The Supreme Court of the United States asserts today that after a nine-month investigation [SEE HERE] they just cannot find the person who leaked the draft of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
The draft opinion on the abortion issue was leaked to Politico from inside the court in May 2022 in what the court calls “one of the worst breaches of trust in its history.” However, despite their efforts to get to the bottom of the leak and find the leaker, they cannot find out who it was.
The court then delivers a two-page memo explaining the situation, and a 23-page report from former Secretary of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff.
(Source)
This reminds me of the Carter Page FISA leak on March 17, 2017, when the FBI investigator found the leaker, James Wolfe, but when push came to shove into court the DOJ official position evolved into the FISA was never leaked. Obviously, Senate Intelligence Committee (SSCI) Vice-Chair Mark Warner (D-VA) breathed a sigh of relief. Similarly, whoever the leaker of the Dobbs decision was/is also safe now.
It’s odd how DC always finds a way to protect itself. Something akin to “prosecution was declined” whenever FBI unlawful conduct is discovered.
In the SCOTUS leak example, we are supposed to pretend every possible avenue of investigation was exhausted and yet the rascal leaker couldn’t be found. The “Marshal of the Supreme Court” did her earnest best but came up empty. Probably because the leaker is hiding with the January 6th pipe bomber. Yeah, gottabe.
Something is rotten in Denmark. How can the highest court in the land, the ultimate purveyor of Justice be ok with not getting Justice? That of course is sarcasm. It blows the mind that the court absolutely could find out if they wanted to know. Are they all corrupt? How can they just let this go? This was such a violation of trust. It sullies what’s left of the public’s trust in this sector of our government. I gave up on them after refusing the election fraud cases, but gained hope with R v W being overturned.
1 step forward, 5 steps back whenever “the government” is involved.
That is part of their aim. Sully any thing to do with Americas system of gov.
Wray is too busy looking into pre-crimes.
In the private sector, everyone is given a polygrah and anyone who refuses or fails is fired. Leak fixed. They have had more than enough time to have given them all by now, which makes me suspect it was a liberal judge who leaked it, and there is nothing they can do about it.
yeah, that’s my question – can Court employees be compelled to polygraph examinations as part of an investigation?
anyone?
The Supreme Court makes its own rules, so yes, they can require it and Congress be damned.
This^ or a liberal judge stonewalling the investigation.
I would bet sotomayor or kagan.
I believe it is the one who does not know who a woman is. She was not yet on the court but either was fed the information or got it in some way.
Craven self-righteousness is a disgusting thing.
Yeah, I’m looking at you Roberts.
Put everyone in jail until thire memories improve.
Give’m the J6 treatment?
The whole thing reeks of a cover up by Roberts.
You’re missing the obvious here.
“unable to identify a person by a preponderance of the evidence.”
In other words, they know who did it, but they can’t (don’t want to release the evidence that would) prove it.
You are right on target, T.P. It was one of their own, and now it’s CYA time.
‘…unwilling to identify a person by a preponderance of the evidence.’
There…fixed it. It is really the only word that fits.
Or they are routinely leaking and they have identified many leakers but just can’t pin down which leaker did this leak.
Hey, Get That FILTHY WIFE Beater, OJ Simpson to look while he is searching for the ” real killer “of Nicole Brown & Ron Goldman.
OJ checked a pile of golf courses and so far he came up empty. Sometimes those pesky criminals are smarter than the Cops.
Sure, a woman couldn’t find the leaker of an abortion ruling. Let me see, I think the leaker was probably Sotomayor or Kagan, or perhaps even the tranny Roberts himself..
Bingo! The likely leaker is Roberts himself. He ordered an ineffective investigation by an unqualified S.C. Marshal so he would not be found out. He did not want the majority to reverse Roe so the leak was the only way to put pressure on them. Roberts has proved himself to be a weasel in the past.
They are “unable to identify” that can mean two things:
1: they have no idea who it was.
2: They know who did it, but for reasons unstated cannot identify that person to the general public.
Classic weasel wording.
So instead, the ENTIRE SC takes a hit in their collective integrity.
Hmmm must have been someone important…. Too big to identify.
If one domino falls, a lot more go with it!
I have never trusted the SCOTUS. It is probably a bit more corrupt than the DOJ and they hide it well behind those imperious doors. They have no intention of saving America and anyone who would believe otherwise is a fool. Just examine the liberal side of the court one by one. Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson are all three radicals. Kavanaugh and Roberts really don’t seem to have any principles that one can view as dependable in making decisions. Gorsuch seems conservative but then he will often rules out in left field like Barrett. The other two seem dependable justices but I wouldn’t bet the farm on any decision they would make.
I think the leaker is a justice.
Immediately felt that after seeing the leaker was being protected. Ridiculous to believe this at face value.
Sounds to me like they are afraid of being called racist. It don,t take a super sleuth to figure out where it came from. Just axe what a woman is and figure it out from there.
This was part of the election fraud. This provided cover by saying women came out in record numbers for Roe and Democrats. Witnesses of the crime said the suspects were wearing black.
The leaker is likely a known leftist.
The leaker is known by the court.
If it were anyone on the right, the media would have been all over it since the other leftists on the court would leak who it is.
The leftists would be screeching night and day for that Justice to be removed. In fairness or some such tripe.
So a demented pervert could put another nitwit leftist on the court.
So, it wasn’t Clarence Thomas or Alito. I do not trust anyone else.
I read recently that “rumour has it” that the top Demoncrats rats want that really old wizened judge Sotomire(?) to retire so they can replace her with an even more leftie.
Look there……
“this Court consulted Mr. Michael Chertoff…”
Really? REALLY????
They may as well have hired a fox to count eggs in a vacant hen house!!!!!
I did see Molly Hemingway on Laura Ingraham’s show tonight, and she discussed a couple of questions I have had for awhile.
Apparently, some employees lawyered up and few said they had told spouses about the opinion. Which is VERBOTEN!
SO, were the Justices and their family or friends questioned? Were any of the employees’ family or friends questioned?
I guess it is now up to crowd-sourcing…
Meet Mrs Chertoff:
https://fedsoc.org/contributors/meryl-chertoff
Is the “Marshal of the Supreme Court” the same height as the January 5th pipe bomber?
Johnroberts…
Chertoff.
Honestly, I’m surprised they just didn’t say they’re not going to tell us and we can’t make them. That’s what this is even if they don’t admit it.
Lie; lies, lies.
The Federal Government could not exist without lies.
It is an essential element in its blood.
Without lies, the Federal Government dies.
All this means is that the leaker, who is known, was someone VERY important. Sotomayor? Chertoff is a highly payed mercenary.
Leftists just can’t leave it alone
They lost the fight over Kavanaugh’s appointment
But that doesn’t mean they can’t continue to litigate it in the public square
‘Bourne Identity’ director says new Brett Kavanaugh documentary ‘picks up where FBI investigation fell short’
‘The film examines our judicial process and the institutions behind it,’ director Doug Liman says
Roberts or Kagan.
tell me again what was the crime here?
breach of trust – maybe: if there was mutual trust among the justices and their clerks/agents which I doubt.
crime – no
people talk about trust-society, but America is so broken that does not apply anymore.
Has anyone seriously expected anything else from the Robert’s Deep State court?
Every action they took so far has been politically motivated, from Obamacare to Texas V Pennsylvania and the most recent Roe rulings. Misdirection was always at the heart of the SCOTUS’ actions, much like in theatrical magic where managing audience attention is the key. Don’t kid yourself for a second—none of these decisions was made with the constitutionality in mind; rather every single one of them has been made to help the permanent D.C. to consolidate and amass more power.
Chief Justice Roberts appoints judges to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that has publicly admitted multiple times that the national security agencies, particularly the FBI and their “contractors,” have been abusing the NSA database spying on thousands of Americans and yet still refuses to reject their requests and never even considered referring a single national security official (or contractor) for prosecution.
The idea that the Madisonian institutional arrangements still obtain today—especially that of checks and balances based on the separation of powers—is a nostalgic fiction. What the Federalist describes about the functions of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches has no connection with current reality.
The job of the Supreme Court and the entire judiciary today is to ensure that prosecution is waived and laws are intentionally misapplied to protect a gigantic criminal enterprise that is the modern-day U.S. government.
I can’t believe they don’t know who leaked the opinion. The pool of people having access to it was so small that it should have been easy.
I think the leaker was a son or daughter of someone of importance in DC. The Court didn’t want to ruin this young person’s career or incur the wrath of the parent.
The IRS, the FBI, the scotus, the Capital police, the congress, the Senate, voting, ………….All corrupt.
We are the only thing that can fix this.
But without a vote it will be ugly.
Signs point to John Roberts or his staff as the leaker. He couldn’t save Roe by siding with the liberals, so he went the route of intimidating justices.
That rascally traitor is in here somewhere, but we just can’t find ’em.
Oh well. No big deal. Back to what we were doing before….. as all the justices walk up the steps of the supreme court, stop, lift up their robes, bend over, and moon the masses.
my money is on Roberts, his wife, or some bimbo hes dickin.
And this is what a “captured state” looks like; owned lock, stock, and barrel by the bankers of the world.
I hate da gubmint
In reality I believe the leaker was correctly identified not long after the incident – it was a female clerk for an outgoing “liberal” (Fascist) Justice, who was fanatically pro-choice (anti-life). Her husband (a biological male) just-so-happened to have worked with the journalist who revealed the information. As I recall they had collaborated previously on stories and had a personal friendship.
So that had to be Breyer who retired in June 2022. Now we just need a list of Breyers female clerks.
Ketanji Brown Jackson, 116th Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, clerked for her predecessor Justice Stephen Breyer during the 1999–2000 term.
Cannot find or do not want to out one of their own?
It’s ALL corrupt.
The country is in grave and immediate danger. The revolution is being televised on smartphones and laptops.
The internet makes them stronger, but vulnerable. They will have to control it and restrict access.
John Roberts — Deep State asset.
February 1993, newly sworn AG, Janet Reno fired 93 of 94 assistant AG, all except Michael Chertoff. This ended Mena Airport and Iran-Contra investigations and positioned Chertoff for his 9/11 coverup career
Lou Dobbs doubts the results of the SCOTUS leak investigation
By Just the News, No Noise
19 Jan 2023
https://rumble.com/v26ce8i-lou-dobbs-doubts-the-results-of-the-scotus-leak-investigation.html
Fire them all!
This doesn’t surprise me at all.
I remember when Jeff Sessions was looking into leaks coming from the White House. Whatever happened to that investigation? Crickets.
I reviewed Chertoffs 23 page report. Here are some takeaways:
Except for Thomas and Alito, this Supreme Court is not a dependable institution.
They know if they expose who leaked Dobbs, that the FBI and DOJ will completely turn their back while the “woke” mob goes from protesting to lynching …
One of the justices was the leaker.
Well, you can be sure the perp was not a conservative! The two-tiered justice system at work again.
Lifetime appointments and no accountability. Another government branch gone rogue.
They know exactly who the leaker is : Johnny Roberts . He was trying to get the opinion changed to his liking .
It was the low IQ radically stupid Sotomayor, of course. Cannot identify her because nobody questioned the Justices, nor did they need to ask the obvious leaker. However, there would be no benefit to disclosing what they know to the public. It would only cause strife and division on and for the Court.
Did the “investigators” administer any lie detector tests?
Bet not…
They probably know who the leaker is but simply won’t tell us.
To me, this is proof the leak came from the newest Commie on the court.
Divide and Conquer.
That is what the leak provided. What was needed was an easy way to keep the country split, quick and easy mark for them to do.