After the strangest of conversations – perhaps it is time to outline the ruse a little better. Just so investigators don’t go thinking the target of their “gotcha” has too much value.
Yeah, we are going into W8 territory. Clarifying the perhaps Unclarifiable.
If you want to understand the Dee Dee scheme. You must first re-wire your previous definitions. So for the sake of this post let me eliminate names and instead replace with numbers.
On March 19th, 2012, the Scheme Team interviewed an ear witness. They labeled her Dee Dee. On April 2nd, 2012, the State of Florida interviewed an ear witness. They labeled her W8, and later Rachel Jeantel.
But for the sake of understanding what really took place, we need to reset definitions.
DeeDee is 319 (three nineteen) and W8 [Rachel Jeantel] is 42 (forty two). Got it?
OK, here we go…
First you must remember what the goal was during the week of 3/11/12 to 3/16/12. The Scheme Team was being told by Police Chief Bill Lee, along with Seminole County SAO Norm Wolfinger, there was no basis for an arrest of George Zimmerman. The homicide detectives/investigators had found nothing to dispute the basis for what Mr. Zimmerman had asserted. Yet, the Scheme Team were demanding an arrest. All they wanted was an arrest. Why?
Well to understand that aspect you must reconcile yourself to understanding their prior victory in the Martin Lee Anderson case. The primary coordinators of the Scheme Team, Daryl Parks and Benjamin Crump, extorted $7.4 million in wrongful death lawsuits from the state and county. They achieved this without any criminal finding of wrongdoing on behalf of any entity. The Scheme Team did this merely by politically pressuring for an arrest of the Boot Camp employees.
In the Martin Lee Anderson case they got their arrest, they did not get any conviction, but they did successfully extort the County and State.
So in their frame of reference, when they applied the principles for how to win money toward the Trayvon Martin shooting this was what they proclaimed:
“…we are not asking that he is convicted. We only want to have him arrested, so we will have the day in court, and this won’t be swept under the rug. That’s just simple justice. That is all his mother and father have asked for from the very beginning. We are not asking that he [Zimmerman] be convicted; We are asking that he be arrested” (Ben Crump on CNN)
You see, in their mind, they only needed an arrest. If they could get that arrest, then they would be able to apply political pressure against any litigant to give them wrongful death damages. In their mind, during that mid-March timeframe, this is what matters. It is important to understand this aspect, because the rabidity of their sequential process blinded them to some really troubling decisions.
We simply wanted an arrest; we wanted nothing more than an arrest. We wanted nothing more, nothing less; We just wanted an arrest, and we got it, and I say thank you. (Sybrina Fulton 4/11/12)
The intensity for that “arrest” is what brought them into Mayor Triplett’s office on Friday 3/16/12, desperate to find something to assist them in moving forward toward that goal.
At the time we called that something “media evidence”. Media evidence need not be real evidence, or even legal evidence, it just needed to accomplish the goal of “arrest”. And there were plenty of media types more than willing to assist them in selling that media evidence. (See Matt Gutman and Candace Smith – ABC)
So to try to make a seriously long story digestible, let’s just accept for now that an arrest was job #1. Or as Crump said, first base.
So, immediately following the 911 call tape meeting in Mayor Tripletts office, the Scheme Team placed the narrative into the media that Sybrina Fulton had positively id’d Trayvon calling for help. The hearing scheduled for Monday to determine the legality (Earnhardt Law) of releasing the 911 audio became moot because of pressure by City Manager Norton Bonaparte applied to Mayor Jeff Triplett. The Scheme Team had their 911 audio narrative.
On the weekend that followed, they expanded the narrative to include an “ear witness”. Supposedly on Saturday 3/17/12, late at night, Tracy Martin discovered a phone call made on Trayvon’s phone while checking his phone records on-line. We now know this aspect to be false because Trayvon’s phone was on his mothers account, not Tracy, but again for the sake of exhaustive text I’m going to include the lies into an honest descriptive of the narrative at the time – so don’t get distracted.
The story was that Tracy then called Crump, who told him to reach out to the “her”. On Sunday 3/18/12, Tracy supposedly called the number and reached a person later identified by the Scheme Team as “Dee Dee”. On Monday, 3/19/12, a conference call was established with “Dee Dee” and she gave a recorded interview. Matt Gutman from ABC news was present and also recording. Gutman wrote his first story that night for broadcast the following day.
On Tuesday 3/20/12, Ben Crump delivered a now famous press conference to claim that “Dee Dee”, Trayvons girlfriend, his puppy love, had been talking to him for 400 minutes that day and had heard the encounter with George Zimmerman. Crump proclaimed that this witness connected the dots and proved that Zimmerman had shot Martin in cold blood. (Crump’s CNN PRESSER Transcript HERE)
OK. Well that’s the official version sold by the Scheme Team and the media. From here on out Dee Dee is now 319 (three nineteen).
319 formed the basis for the Probable Cause Affidavit, and for the longest time everyone, myself included, thought that 319 was 42. But there were just too many odd disconnects.
Not the least of which was the whole damned story about: Only Crump was allowed to talk to 319; 319 never calling anyone post shooting to report her knowledge; 319 being unknown to Tracy or Sybrina; 319 being on the phone for 400 minutes – I mean seriously, what teen “talks” for 400 mins; 319 missing the funeral because of she was in the hospital; the whole darned story just stunk to high heavens. Then this picture:
Rut roh’, does the name Tawana Brawley ring a bell.
People, mostly me, began to query this 319 person. And assemble ALL of the talking points being told about her. First she was 16-years-old. Then Daryl Parks and Natalie Jackson said she was 17 ; And many more odd disconnections surfaced – But the media stayed willfully blind.
There were so many inconsistencies from the Scheme Team themselves that it became obvious this was fishy. Then we got word of 42. Forty two is the person the state of florida based their Probable Cause Arrest affidavit around.
But the PCA did not have what 319 supposedly told ABC/Crump. Instead it had a really obscure aspect toward the entire account:
Even detective Gilbreath admitted as such on the stand when questioned by new defense attorney Mark O’Mara at the first bond hearing.
O’Mara – “Do you know who started the fight?”
Gilbreath – “Do I know? No”
O’Mara – “Do you have any evidence that supports who may have started the fight?”
Gilbreath – “No.”
O’Mara – “Do you have any evidence, any evidence at all, any witnesses, any statements, anything that would contradict Mr. Zimmerman’s assertion?
Gilbreath – Err, no. Well, do I know who punched first? No.
WHAT? If 319 heard what she said she heard, then how could Gilbreath not know who threw the first punch? Again, something really odd.
It was from sitting down looking at all of these dots, that two categories became brutally obvious. There were two totally differing stories. But why?
Why would there be two differing stories? One outlined in the 42 statement that led to the PCA (no audio available at the time), and one outlined in the 319 audio interview. They just didn’t match. Why?
BINGO !
They are two different people.
WHISKEY – TANGO – FOXTROT ! You gotta be kidding me? No way. Impossible. How?
Again – what you need to do to gain an understanding is reset your cognition. You, me, the media, and everyone else kept reconciling 319 and 42 as the same. They are not.
The state of Florida never met 319. They only met 42.
So the State of Florida could only use the information provided by 42. To them, 319 never existed – she does not factor into their process. Not yet anyway.
Here is where you have to understand that if 319 and 42 walked into a TV studio, everyone would immediately think OH SHIT, THE STATE IS IN BIG TROUBLE NOW. Not so fast, as I recently told an investigator who had the same immediate reaction.
You see, 319 being different than 42 only matters for the embarrassment of the Scheme Team and the Media they duped. It really does not pertain to the prosecution, because they have plausible deniability. They can simply say, that 319 has no bearing on their case because they only ever met 42, only ever proceeded with 42, and only ever used 42 as evidence in their case.
To the state, the existence of a 319 giving an interview to the media on 3/19/12 does not matter. They never used that interview. They used the 4/2/12 affidavit she swore under oath. Nothing about 319 applies to the State.
Nothing that is except one sticky detail.
Sticky detail: On 4/2/12 – If you accept that even though the State never met 319 (at this point) they had to go and get her, pick her up, and bring her for an interview. Now, they were doing this based solely on the information being provided to them by the Scheme Team. And… as was told in court by 42, and supported by our research and analysis of the pre-trial events, she was picked up by TC O’Steen, Bernie De La Rionda, and Sybrina Fulton (car #1).
So on 4/2/12 the State was under the impression that 42 was 16-years-old. This was, after all, the original narrative. Yet they picked her up (TC driving, BDLR passenger seat, Sybrina and 42 rear) and took her for an affidavit, without parental permission?
Then upon arrival at Sybrina’s apartment, they took the affidavit while 42 was sitting on the couch next to Sybrina, and never ASKED FOR ID?
Didn’t anyone watching the trial wonder why the two state investigators who spent a year on this case, O’Steen and Gilbreath, never took the stand?
Here’s where it gets really interesting – WITHOUT US, THE STATE WOULD NEVER HAVE KNOWN THERE WERE TWO PEOPLE.
That’s right. Without what we had written about the ongoing irreconcilable differences the state would have been no wiser.
But as a consequence of us pointing out the issues, many of them from social media, the state flew 42 to Jacksonville on August 2nd 2012. Along with a girl named “Francine”, who we identify as 319.
So on August 2nd, 2012, the state had 42 and 319 together. What came out of that interview was the admission/discovery that 42 was never in the hospital. 42 was not 16-years-old, she was actually 18 – and more.
Now, if you reset your thinking with this in mind, not only does the state’s approach from that moment forward make sense, but it all reconciles. Remember BDLR in court (pre-trial) saying:
“is she 16 years old”?, “Is she a minor”? We’ve never told you that…
BDLR/The State was talking directly to O’Mara. And indeed, if you take 319 Crump out of the picture, BDLR is correct. HE never told anyone that, Crump did. And the state is not using 319 they are using 42.
319 is not a risk to the state, she is a risk to the Scheme Team. 319 wrote the letter that 42 signed, 42 even admitted as such on the stand. Crump tries to avoid his own ass in a sling by saying he never asked for 319’s last name or parental permission either.
319 is a person. She was on the phone with Trayvon, but she did not want to be involved because her testimony would never have helped. It would have hurt.
319 was also told by the Scheme Team she would never have to testify. Just get them to an arrest. The problem arose when Crump, acting as spokesperson for 319, said she would not talk to police, and so Seminole County District Attorney Wolfinger said fine, he would subpoena her for the already impaneled Grand Jury on 4/11/12.
What was Crump going to do? He told 319 he only needed a statement, and now he had investigators demanding to interview her, and a State Attorney ready to subpoena her for testimony. Yikes.
Whip up the BGI quickly, call his buddy Al Sharpton, and then call Pam Bondi ASAP to go in another direction. That led to Angela Corey, and more importantly bought Crump time to coordinate 42.
Remember 42 on the stand saying she did not know what Trayvon was doing between the 7-11 and the Sub-Division, nor did she remember talking to him between the 7-11 and the Retreat at Twin Lakes.
Between 319 and 42 Sybrina said she met Trayvon’s girlfriend in December 2011. Yet 42 says she only met Trayvon on 2/1/12 at her 18th birthday party. And she most certainly was NOT his girlfriend…. NO_LIMIT_NIGGA will step up on outta that grave and put a whoop ass on anyone who would even think such a thing…. {{{yikes}}}
Trayvon’s friends are SERIOUSLY bent about this person, who looks like Precious, who they did not know, being on TV and telling the world she was their friend’s BFF. And getting NO_LIMIT_SCHOLARSHIPS to boot, not to mention the buckets of $$$, new braces, and an upcoming lower jaw bone reset.
The Scheme Team transferred the phone from 319 into the name of 42; Then coached her up on what to say; Assigned her a handler from the outer scheme team ring; And she is delivering a scripted message.
But, like I said previous, there are some chinks in the construct. Those chinks are what people are noticing as irreconcilable differences in the storyline. However, they are not a risk to the State per se’, they are only embarrassment risks to the Scheme Team from the perspective of the public finding out. The State has plausible deniability, because they only *used* 42.
