Whether Mark O’Mara will seek another attempt to delay trial now the Fifth District Court of Appeals has ruled in his favor -regarding the Benjamin Crump deposition- is an unknown variable. However, after numerous person to person conversations today it would be a good thing if he did. A very good thing.
After confronting roadblocks head-on, we are close to bringing forth a super-nova blast of sunlight, perhaps as early as late tomorrow. (cautious optimism) If we’re lucky, and God Willing, the information we should be able to share will lend a whole new perspective toward events scheduled to occur on Thursday / Friday. {{fingers crossed}}
Regarding the District Court of Appeals, we can confirm, with specific certainty, the three judges involved in the decision/ruling for the Writ of Certiorari: Lawson, Evander and Cohen, are considered the three absolute best. They are not only isolated from pressure they are highly likely to know exactly what is going on with the Zimmerman case as a whole.
As expected they each have multiple law clerks who do extensive research for them. Not only on technical legalese, but also toward the background facts surrounding ‘in-real-time’ events. This is one situation where the high profile of alignment against the accused actually helps the defense. People are indeed paying attention.
[Paraphrased] “An appellate court clerks primary job is to make sure “their individual” judge is not embarrassed in their rulings. While the substance of the arguments in this case -which reach their level- are viewed through a microscope, those judges, and those who diligently prepare for their response, are also fully ‘engaged’ and situationally aware of what is going on through binoculars”.
It is now painfully apparent trial Judge Nelson, and by consequence her clerk, are both awkwardly incompetent. From this and other prior issues/rulings, on a broad stroke she is not well thought of as a judge. The people who would lend to speak “highly” of her, or afford a “positive perspective” of her judicial prowess are doing so out of an anticipation of need for courtroom favor. Quote: “kissing ass for courtroom favor”.
Judge Nelson was a former prosecutor in Broward County for a number of years before moving up to central Florida. Her tendency toward the prosecution side of criminal trial helps explain her favor toward Corey, De La Rionda et al. In essence she is over-indulging, (quote: “helping”) a fellow prosecutor; And unfortunately her constitution, as many have pointed out from external review, does not position her to believe, or accept, that she is being “bamboozled” by the 4th district out of Jacksonville.
Consequently Nelson’s name was part of a long list of DCA candidates in the last selection go around. But, as predicted, and expected, she didn’t even make it out of Judicial Nomination Committee.
Additionally, on another matter – I have been too generous with the extension of timing for the phone data afforded to the State of Florida. Without knowing any different, and without hearing from any source, I had projected the State “must have” known the phone contents prior to, or in, the June/July 2012 timeframe.
[carefully parsed paragraph warning] The content of Trayvon Martin’s cell phone “may” contain information not only pertinent to the George Zimmerman defense team – but also for Miami-Dade SO. The phone video(s) “could” be of value outside of trial. AND it is more “appropriate” to lend awareness to the State of Florida well before my prior estimation.
Indeed – given the profile of the case, the investigative resources available throughout March 2012, and other variables not previously considered, it is “most likely” the State was well aware of all phone data content PRIOR to the affidavit for probable cause. In short “they” (whomever you would assign ownership value) knew from “the beginning”, with specificity, what was on that phone.
Lastly, as you can tell, we are not yet prepared to concede a trial is a forgone conclusion. However, the entire financial enterprise of all aligned interests are now directly in opposition to such a consideration. Not only does the Scheme Team have a vested interest, and ALL the numerous political escape artists, but now additionally we face the ire of a Legacy Media complex with a vested interest in trial viewership. Expenses to be paid, tickets to be sold, subscriptions to be delivered upon, advertising contingencies etc etc.
But, we ain’t yet at that point.
Trial is not something to fear, but with a trial true moral justice will have failed – and perhaps it could be considered a win, at least, for the media.
With thousands of hours of research behind us, we feel cautiously optimistic we have identified the actual location of the buried truth. The focus getting narrower and narrower as the race against the clock has continued. Our shovels have finally hit a dull “thud” and we are in the process of carefully intensely scraping the last few inches of dirt to identify and validate our endeavors.
This last part is the most nerve-racking. Deliberate we must be. Hopefully, tomorrow we will have much more to share – if not tomorrow then {with fingers crossed on bended knee} within the next 72 hours.
Wolverines!
Lastly, (yeah I know I said that once before but this is the last lastly – swear) can anyone identify the name on this “bling necklace”?
(*note* the original image was mirrored – I have flipped the image horizontally (mirrored it) to assist in identifying the name or logo created in the necklace)
UPDATE: This appears most likely: “B-f-f-l”



