How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time. (Fifth Bite)
There is so much inconsistency, and fabrication, surrounding the “life story narrative” of Obama it can be overwhelming to try to absorb. So even though we will continue the comprehensive discovery we are also going to add a new daily section to our blog. Each day we will highlight a discrepancy.  Just one. Each day. Are they lies? You decide. The objective is just to show the disconnected narrative, not to try to figure out how it got into place or why it is there. We will just point out one specific narrative or discrepancy every day. Feel free to engage your progressive friends in trying to explain why they exist.   The key to discovery is always asking why?   “Why” is a powerful word because it eventually reveals the truth. So today we’re off with example #5.
Todays example of Obama “Dissimulation” is regarding his Selective Service Registration, informally known as “registration for the draft”, or “draft registration”. Credit for this research, discovery, and FOIA record release belongs to Debbie Schlussel, you can visit her website HERE.   Below is an exact scanned copy of the Selective Service Registration Card filled out by Barack Obama and the accompanying “electronic copy of the inquiry screen” straight from the Selective Service System Headquarters.
Did President-elect Barack Hussein Obama commit a federal crime in September of 2008? Or did he never actually register and, instead, did friends of his in the Chicago federal records center, which maintains the official copy of his alleged Selective Service registration commit the crime for him? It’s either one or the other, as indicated by the official release of Barack Obama’s official Selective Service registration for the draft. A  retired federal agent, spent almost a year trying to obtain this document through a Freedom of Information Act request, and, after much stonewalling, finally received it and released it to Debbie Schlussel.

His name is Stephen Coffman. He retired in 2007 from the position of the Resident Agent in Charge of Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Galveston, Texas office.  He has over 32 years of government service and has held a Secret or higher security clearance for the majority of those years.  He filed the FOIA with Selective Service and has the original letter and the attachments. He first notified the Selective Service of his findings and they ignored the questions.  He can be reached via email at [email protected].

But the release of Obama’s draft registration and an accompanying printout document, both posted below, raise more questions than they answers. And they shows many signs of fraud, not to mention putting the lie to Obama’s media claim that he registered for the draft in June 1979, before it was required by law.
Barack Obama’s physical Selective Service registration card and accompanying documents show that questions about him are not only dubious,  but if the signature on the document is in fact his, our Commander-in-Chief may have committed a federal crime in 2008, well within the statute of limitations on the matter.   If it is not his signature, then it’s proof positive that our Commander-in-Chief never registered with the Selective Service as required by law.  By law, he was required to register and was legally able to do so until the age of 26.  Registration with selective service is a requirement for holding any federal office.
The Selective Service System registration (“SSS Form 1”) and accompanying computer print-out (“SSS Print-out), below, released by the Selective Service show the following oddities and irregularities, all of which indicate the document was created in 2008 and backdated:


First Problem:  The  Document Location Number Indicates Obama Selective Service Form was Created in 2008
First, there is the Document Location Number (DLN) on the form. In the upper right hand corner of the Selective Service form SSS Form 1, there is the standard Bates-stamped DLN, in this case “0897080632,” which I’ve labeled as “A” on both the SSS Form and the computer printout document. On the form, it reflects a 2008 creation, but on the printout, an extra eight was added in front of the number to make it look like it is from 1980, when it was actually created in 2008.
As Federal Agent Coffman notes:

Having worked for the Federal Government for several decades, I know that the standardization of DLNs have the first two digits of the DLN representing the year of issue. That would mean that this DLN was issued in 2008. The DLN on the computer screen printout is the exact same number, except an 8 has been added to make it look like it is from 1980 and give it a 1980 DLN number. And 1980 is the year Senator/President Elect Obama is said to have timely registered. So, why does the machine-stamped DLN reflect this year (2008) and the DLN in the database (which was manually input) reflect a “corrected” DLN year of 1980? Were all the DLNs issued in 1980 erroneously marked with a 2008 DLN year or does the Selective Service use a different DLN system then the rest of the Federal Government? Or was the SSS Form 1 actually processed in 2008 and not 1980?

It’s quite a “coincidence”, that is, if you believe in coincidences, especially in this case.
Far more likely is that someone made up a fake Selective Service registration to cover Obama’s lack of having done so, and that the person stamping the form forgot (or was unable to) change the year to “80” instead of the current “08”.   They either forgot to fake the DLN number or couldn’t do so.
And guess where the Selective Service registrations are marked and recorded?  Chicago, Illinois.   We learn more about the internal processing from an article entitled, “Post Office Registration Process”, on the Selective Service website:

When a young man reaches 18 he can go to any of the 35,000 post offices nationwide to register with Selective Service. There he completes a simple registration card and mails it to the Selective Service System. This begins a multi-step process which results in the man’s registration.

Each week approximately 6,000 completed registration cards are sent to the Selective Service System’s Data Management System (DMC) near Chicago, Ill. At the DMC these cards are grouped into manageable quantities. Each card is then microfilmed and stamped with a sequential document locator number. The processed microfilm is reviewed to account for all documents and to ensure that the film quality is within strict standards. After microfilming, the cards are keyed and then verified by a different data transcriber.

The Document Locator Number (DLN) is an automatic function (Selective Service record-keeping, specifically the DLN is described on pages 7-8 of this Federal Register document), with the first two digits comprising the year, and it was not changed to “08” in error.   So if the form was filed and processed in 1980, how did it get a 2008 Document Location Number ? 

By itself the first problem is enough to prove beyond reasonable refute that there is a problem.   The DLN on the registration card specifically designates that it was filed in 2008… period.  end of statement.  Done.   But alas there’s more. 

Second Problem:  – Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form is Apparently 1990 Form Altered to Appear Like 1980 Form
On the SSS Form 1, in the lower left hand corner is the form number (SSS Form 1) and the month and year version of the form, labeled as “B”.  On this particular Form 1, it clearly shows the month as “FEB” (February), and the year is either “80” or “90”. The retired federal agent investigated further:

Magnification of the form both physically (with a 10x glass) or with different image software does not reflect a clear cut result of either a “80” or a “90”.

But, checking the history of SSS Form 1 (see https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=198002-3240-001#), it’s apparent that in February 1980, the Selective Service agency withdrew a “Request for a new OMB control number” for SSS Form 1 (see also, here)–meaning the agency canceled its previous request for a new form, and one was never issued in “FEB 1980”.
Since under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. No. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (Dec. 11, 1980), codified in part at Subchapter I of Chapter 35 of Title 44 a federal agency can not use a form not approved by OMB (Office of Management and Budget), it’s nearly impossible for Senator/President-Elect Obama’s SSS Form 1 to be dated “Feb 1980.” And since that makes it almost certainly dated “Feb 1990,” then how could Barack Obama sign it and the postal clerk stamp it almost ten (10) years before its issue ? Simply not possible.
The lower right hand corner reflects that the Obama SSS form 1 was approved by OMB with an approval number of 19??0002, labeled as “C”. The double question marks (??) reflect digits that are not completely clear.
Third Problem:  Barack Obama’s Signature is Dated After Postal Stamp Certifying His Signature.
Barack H. Obama signed the SSS Form 1’s “Today’s date” as July 30, 1980, labeled “D”. But the Postal Stamp reflects the PREVIOUS day’s date of July 29, 1980, labeled “E”. Yes, Obama could have mistakenly written the wrong date, but it is rare and much more unlikely for someone to put a future date than a past date.

(Also note how Barry made such a “cute” peace sign with the “b” inside the “O” of his signature. Touching.)

Fourth Problem: –  Postal Stamp is Incorrect, Discontinued in 1970
Then, there is the question as to whether the Postal Stamp is real. The “postmark” stamp–labeled “E”–is hard to read, but it is clear that at the bottom is “USPO” which stands typically for United States Post Office. However, current “postmark” validator, registry, or round dater stamps (item 570 per the Postal Operations Manual) shows “USPS” for United States Postal Service. The change from Post Office to Postal Service occurred on August 12, 1970, when President Nixon signed into law the most comprehensive postal legislation since the founding of the Republic–Public Law 91-375. The new Postal Service officially began operations on July 1, 1971.
Why was an old, obsolete postmark round dater stamp used almost ten (10) years after the fact to validate a legal document . . . that just happened to be Barack Obama’s suspicious Selective Service registration form?
Fifth Problem: –  Form Shows Barack Obama didn’t have ID
The SSS Form 1 states “NO ID”, labeled “F”. Since that’s the case, then how did the Hawaiian postal clerk know that the submitter was really Barack H. Obama, who may have been on summer break from attending Occidental College in California. How would they determine whether the registrant was truly registering and not a relative, friend, or other imposter?  And who would go to register for Selective Service without taking ID with them?  Seriously?
Sixth Problem: – The Selective Service Data Mgt. Center Stonewalled for Almost a Year on Obama Registration, Until Right Before the Election.
The retired federal agent Stephen Coffman who submitted the Freedom Of Information Act document request for Barack Obama’s Selective Service Registration Form notes:

Early in 2008, when I first started questioning whether Obama registered I was told:

 Sir: There may be an error in his file or many other reasons why his registration cannot be confirmed on-line. However, I did confirm with our Data Management Center that he is, indeed, registered with the Selective Service System, in compliance with Federal law.
Sincerely,

Janice L. Hughes/SSS

Then, they suddenly found the record on September 9, 2008 (prior to my October 13, 2008 request), and stated that his record was filed on September 4, 1980. Did they temporarily change the date on the computer database?
On the previous FOIA response, they stated that it was filed on September 4, 1980. In my second request I mentioned that Obama could not have filed it in Hawaii on September 4, 1980 as he was attending Occidental College in California, the classes of which commenced August 24, 1980.
Other Problems: –  Missing Selective Service Number, FOIA Response Dated Prior to FOIA Request, Missing Printout Page

• Where is Obama’s Selective Service number (61-1125539-1) on the printout?
• And in a really wierd twist agent Coffman notes the Selective Service Data Management Center prepared its response to his FOIA request prior to the request having been made:

The last transaction date is 09/04/80  labeled “G”, but the date of the printout is 09/09/08 labeled “H”.   My FOIA was dated October 13 so why did they prepare the printout BEFORE I submitted my FOIA?   I gave them no “heads up” that I was sending it.  In fact it was not mailed until late October, around the 25th.

• Also, notice the printout was page 1 of 2  “I”.  Hmmm . . . where is the other page, and what’s on it?
• Also note that the Document Location Number (DLN) in upper right corner (labeled “A“) has only ten (10) digits  with the first two being 08 , but the DLN number shown on the computer screen printout has eleven (11) digits with the first two being 80.  This  clearly indicates that the “8” was added at the beginning of the DLN number, in order to appear that it was issued in 1980  and wasn’t simply a reversal of the first two digits as the retired federal agent noted.  This in itself appears questionable.  I would think there is a standard number of digits in all Document Location Numbers.

Really not a lot of questions here:

• Perhaps evidence that this government-released, official Barack Obama Selective Service registration was faked.
• Either he signed the fake backdated document, or someone else faked his signature and he never registered for the draft (and lied about it).
• Which is it?
• It is not a matter of whether the false submission occurred, it is more a matter of who was involved in creating the documents and then trying to manipulate them to make it look like they were older than truthfully evident.
• Think about the damage this would have done to Barack Obama the candidate.  If it was discovered he did not register for Selective Service, it would also prove that he lied on his qualification paperwork for his Senate seat.
• You cannot hold federal office, not even a little one, without having registered as legally required for Selective Service.  Your eligibility to work for the Federal government is contingent on compliance with this law.

It’s incredible that our Commander-in-Chief either didn’t register for the draft, actually became a United States Senator, and then registered belatedly, choosing fraud as a manner to cover the prior decision.   The documents indicate it’s one or the other.  This discrepancy really is not a matter of opinion.  The documents clearly speak for themselves.
You would think this would be an easy one for the media to solve.   After all, it is what it is..