There are various points of view on a controversial section 219 within the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) bill that passed the House of Representatives last night and is heading to the Senate.
Section 219 (formerly Section 224) is part of the Fiscal Year 2027 NDAA. It directs the Secretary of Defense to designate a Pentagon executive agent responsible for overseeing the United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative, which aims to accelerate joint research, development, testing, evaluation, and industrial cooperation between the U.S. and Israel in defense technologies; specifically: missile defense, counter-drone systems, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, quantum computing, directed energy, biotechnology, and autonomous systems.
Many people are mistakenly viewing this section as a merge of the military; that’s not the case. The issue is specifically about joint collaboration on missile defense systems and drone technology. Secretary Marco Rubio was asked about it today. Rubio’s response is outlined below:
QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, you know the Senate better than most anybody. They’re debating the new military policy bill right now after the House passed it. One of the more controversial topics is about fusing the U.S. and Israeli military when it comes to co-production on things. Do you have any sovereignty concerns about that, if there are situations where the United States wants to send weapons? Iron Dome came up with Ukraine when the Israelis —
SECRETARY RUBIO: You’re asking about NDAA? Yeah, I mean, that – largely the Department of War manages that legislative portfolio, so I’m aware of the provision you’re discussing that involves cooperation on technology. And look, at the end of the day, the truth is we do that with countries all over the world.
QUESTION: So you support it?
SECRETARY RUBIO: I mean, if somebody – well, I haven’t read the specific provision in terms to tell you in detail. I understand – I understand the topic, though, because it’s not new. On air defense, for example, we’ve long cooperated with the Israelis. Look, if we have a breakthrough in our system or they have a breakthrough in theirs, we could share that in a way to improve our own systems as well. So if they’ve come up with some novel way of defeating drones, for example, of course we would want to have that and benefit from it. By the way, they’re not the only country in the world that we would do that with. We do that with other countries as well.
So I think that’s the provision you’re referring to, and that’s something we’re already doing. I mean, that’s something that already exists. But I don’t think there’s – that’s different from sovereignty. I mean, it’s not like U.S. forces are going to come under the command and control of a foreign general or anything of that nature.
QUESTION: But when Ukraine was asking for Iron Dome, the United States and some lawmakers, including Lindsey Graham, wanted the U.S. to send Iron Dome battery that was in the East Coast. Netanyahu vetoed that – that was co-production – he vetoed that —
SECRETARY RUBIO: Well – yeah, yeah, but any time you enter into co-production, we have those restrictions too. I mean, if we provide weaponry to a country and it’s part of an agreement, they can’t transfer that to a third country without our approval. That’s – we do the same thing. And Israel’s not the only country in the world that does it. Other countries do it with their systems as well. That’s just a normal way – when you do arms sales, part of the restrictions is you get to veto them passing it on to a third country. That’s not just us or Israel; it’s every country.
{SOURCE}
Wha?? Very interesting… take a listen. In fact, listen to this twice.
Rep. Lauren Boebert addressed why she missed a critical vote on the (NDAA) Section 219, US-Israel Defense Integration Into the annual defense bill.
Boebert said unnamed GOP staffers “lied to her” during…
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 23, 2026
I believe it’s incredibly naive to believe that once the door is opened slightly that it won’t be kicked all the way opened later. The bottom line is this is a bad idea that will have consequences we’ll pay for later. Same as it ever was…
Unfortunately another step towards peonage. Regarding the USS Liberty our troops were killed and Jonathan Pollard, the most consequential spy according to IC, gave Israel our most sensitive secrets and now Section 219/224 will not be a benefit to the US. Finally, if you disagree with Israel/AIPAC, you’re a racist/antisemite.
We do the same thing with multiple countries and have been for decades.
Even assuming you are correct, two wrongs don’t make a right. Something, something foreign entanglements. Americans ought to be demanding our government pull out of them all.
Something, something foreign entanglements…
Sadly, the entanglement has been progressing since the day those words were spoken.
Though prudent, we must accept the world as it now is.
Stated differently
“that train has sailed” ~Austin Powers
I respectfully disagree; we do not have to accept the world as it is now. That pervasive attitude is what got us where we are now. I would rather I and my children die with honor and dignity as human beings, and Americans, fighting on their feet than be beggars on their knees as our treasury is looted constantly for the benefit of others, regardless of whom they may be.
I must have missed the part about emptying our treasury.
Look around you and observe.
Lol
It’s a big planet.
Can you be more specific?
Sure:
https://www.usdebtclock.org/
I don’t put any weight into paying it back, BTW. At this point the average American should just repudiate it.
N/M
What ever makes us think that any “foreign relationship” will remain intact or even the same? I don’t care WHAT the explanation is, the United States of America should NOT be sharing research, development, testing, etc.
As far as cybersecurity, the division of israeli intelligence known as Unit 8200 operates here and has employees AND their technology embedded in many companies already.
International relations can change on a dime…this is the wrong time to tie any administration to this agreement.
Didn’t AOC jump in on X and tell people it was a merger? She was soundly corrected.
Time will tell. I don’t trust Israel and our government’s fascination with being subservient to them.
Israel being but a piece of the puzzle, how about we don’t do this with any country? I dont trust any country out there, unfortunately my own also. Even if I did trust Trump, why would I want this legislation knowing another different intentioned administration could interpret things or do things differently? There is absolutely no need for this in the NDAA, especially if we already do this with other countries outside of the NDAA
Logical & well reasoned response, thank you.
You do realize we do this with multiple countries and we have been for decades?
I could care less. Let’s not share with any of them. Given what we spend on R&D and defense compared to, say our European counterparts, why should there be such likely lopsided sharing? Let’s not send billions in actual money, or inversely give away billions in R&D. Someone explain, explicitly, what we have benefited on and what the exact perceived benefits to gain for the USA. This isnt even about humanitarian giving or being greedy. This is purely about items defensive in nature
How do we know it it would be lopsided?
What is the definition of “lopsided?”
If another country finds a “novel way of defeating drones”, and we have a distinct disadvantage wrt defeating drones, would it not be prudent to have access to such technology before those drones set American defense infrastructure ablaze?
How do we know there are not 1000’s of said drones hiding away in sea containers in Des Moines? Or, Denver? Or, LA? Or Shreveport?
What price does one pay to have a fighting chance of preventing dozens of 9/11’s?
You have obviously not had to “work” with Israeli’s. You would stop posting on the subject.
you’re welcome,
Pogo
Israel is way ahead of us in defense technology.
That’s a bit of an overstatement, we are ahead in some areas but won’t be after this.
“So I think that’s the provision you’re referring to, and that’s something we’re already doing. I mean, that’s something that already exists.”
So then we don’t need Sec. 219. It already exists. Get it out of the NDAA.
It was previously Sec. 224 and has been in every NDAA for years.
Why just call out Israel then and not other countries?
Because they have the best tech??
Still do not need to call out just one country….especially if we have this relationship with other countries as well.
What if only one country has the technology we need; and said country will only share with US with explicit “restrictions” wrt 3rd party sales?
Exactly — how the HELL is this possible?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO country ought to have more advanced materiel than we —
ABSOLUTE national security!
Because Israel, unlike many so-called allies, is wealthy enough and has the defenses to defend itself. Why so many refuse to acknowledge this is beyond me. Christians are supposed to help the poor and downtrodden, not those with the abilities and resources to help themselves.
From the article:
”SECRETARY RUBIO: I mean, if somebody – well, I haven’t read the specific provision in terms to tell you in detail…”
If true, maybe he should get the details before giving a generic response…
I don’t know, just makes me not quite trust that he knows the answer if he doesn’t actually have the facts.
What do ya’ll think?
I think we’ve been doing this with Israel and other countries for decades and that this is just another pressure point for the leftists who have infiltrated the MAGA movement to try to drive another wedge.
If we’re already doing it what’s the point of section 219?
You’re revealing much in this statement. I find it curious and telling that you’re using the red-herring that if one doesn’t fall into lock-step they must be a Leftist and not MAGA. Who is the real divider here?
The same could be said of you.
I suppose one could but that would require intellectual honesty and show the error in my thinking. Simply saying something doesn’t make it so.
Back at ya
Damn joos.
Indeed
Does the CIA approve of this? No other opinion matters.
“Does the CIA approve of this?”
If the CIA didn’t approve of it then it wouldn’t exist. The question to ask is if this was this the CIA’s idea all along. Ultimately the sale of weapons is central to the conversation. Whether the sales are covert or not, it’s also a prime revenue stream for the CIA.
Just as lucrative patents for “vaxxxines” et al are to the CDC…very.
Source?
Dr David E Martin, patent expert.
Which are also weapons.
I can’t stand Boebert! She’s as fake as Luna!
So if we do this with other countries, why do we need a special section for “Israel” called out in an NDAA?
If someone wanted to “trial balloon” the House and Senate on Israel’s behalf to see who they can count on in an election year, this would be one way to do it. Forced to take a public position on a policy that is already executed in reality and would change nothing if stripped completely from the NDAA.
Bingo! That is the tell.
I don’t trust Israel.
What Rubio says is true, for many prior years …
‘…I understand the topic, though, because it’s not new. On air defense, for example, we’ve long cooperated with the Israelis….’
There have been people, defense contractors, associated with Offut air force base (Omaha), that have met with Israel
and vice versa…for many prior years.
And furthermore, that provision that someone is giving sunlight, has been within d c, congressional approved funding agreements for a long, long time.
p.s.
the biotechnology part of the provision, is new to some people
p.s.
it is better to cooperate,
than to have technology stolen [ which some countries do ] or
to have some people in the usa sell it to other countries – without people knowing.
p.s.
and yes, when an armament, or technology is used vs. an opponent,
that also opens up the opportunity for the opponent to reverse engineer the armament from the remnants.
( i.e. the russia hyper sonic missiles will not be unique, forever… )
p.s.
does anyone wonder why automobiles, bicycles, planes, trains, pencils, computers look and function similarly across the world?
hmmm…
yet, europe does have its castles from a prior era …
and other countries do have some unique architecture to their buildings etc.
imho
“it is better to cooperate,
than to have technology stolen [ which some countries do ] or
to have some people in the usa sell it to other countries – without people knowing.”
Israel will steal it anyway is a poor argument.
“Israel will steal it anyway is a poor argument”
That was your comment.
imho
For instance,
developing a technology that allows a moving missile,
to hit another moving missile,
was far, far from an easy task.
p.s.
for practice, simulation,
toss a baseball high into the air,
then take another baseball and try to throw and hit the baseball that you previously tossed into flight.
[ then, try to get that to happen 40 times in row…
…then try to do it in the rain, the wind, the dark etc. ]
At Mach 2
Noticed comments on twitter/X the other day about the US supposedly turning over our military into a subsidiary of Israel’s and thought someone left the looney tune gate open so put it into the 72-hour before thinking about it category.
Now reading this glad it was put into that 72-hour box as this makes perfect sense so the U.S. agencies can openly work with Israel while our agencies can learn and incorporate Israel’s technology for creating our own version of their Iron Dome protection system.
I’m sorry but I care about America and Israel can bless itself.
No, I do not support it. The United States should operate completely independent of any country in our military and Intelligence affairs. We should design and build all our defensive and offensive military weaponry ourselves, and everything including all components and spare parts should be manufactured in the Continental United States by United States citizens.
The issue here is that regardless of realities of this legislation, the optics reinforce the rapidly growing public sentiment that Israel exerts too much influence over the American political system.
Whether you or I agree or disagree with that sentiment, and whether we are correct or not for doing so, is irrelevant to that observation.
Let me fix that for you:
Boebert said “… unnamed GOP (Deep State) staffers “lied to her” during …”
There’s a friggin’ surprise! lol
Speaking of which, I haven’t watched my “Yes Minister” and “Yes, Prime Minister” DVDs lately. If anyone wants true insights into how governments actually function (and are manipulated), they would be well advised to watch these “comedy” episodes …. and then cry afterwards, because you know deep down, that this is how deep state operatives actually work.
It would be treasonous for any country to come up with a tech that revolutionized/breakthrough warfare or defense and then immediately share that with any other country – regardless which country. This is an unstated truth that runs both ways.
Once again “chicken little, the sky is falling”.
If your one of those who is screaming at the sky over this than just look at who’s screaming with you, Ocassio Cortez.
This is nothing new with military tech collaboration with other nations.
All leftist/Rino news outlets need to to create MAGA friction is to mention Israel or Epstein in a pejorative way in their reports or questioning.
If you read the bill it explains the bill.
It doesn’t say integrated military it says integrated technology. Kind of like we do for all of our other allies, and they with us, via weapons systems, radar, platforms, software, aircraft. Etc. Allies share tech…this has been going on forever but because people can’t read or think for themselves they’re easily manipulated into “omg unified and integrated us/Israel miltuhtarry!”
Its stupidly frustrating that no one just reads the text or happens to look up anything from a historical context anymore.
well one way to consider this is that IF the US has pledged to assist Israel against the Islamic horde, which we have and there is no denying it is in our best interests to do so (I happen to believe this true in the national security interests…because we do have a common enemy and we have not had hostilities and only cooperation mostly, as reasonable as can be expected given the circumstances of what drives the Israeli’s to strike palestine terror groups and also the Iran state and it weapons programs….which happen to be the same targets in kind that the US is also striking.
If that is the plan for securing some years of peace from Iran..I call that winning…expensive…yes, but winning a kind of peace from the everyday threat that did exist before that Iran was on the path to its stated death cult annihilation.
sharing technology for military effective weapons systems only seems logical and a plan to make sure our defenses are in tune with and match the threats that exist in that region. We also happen to be doing the same thing with Ukraine by providing an enormous level of very technical and secretive sensors, guidance, intercept and anti drone, drone technologies…as well as the standard conventional weapons. In return, the US gets to have first pick over the weapons systems effectivness and in what direction ukraine is choosing to utilize it hybrid military arsenal. This intelligence is worth billions in research and development. By proxy, the US benefits in refining the sharp edge of our weapons and doctrines….that is how the modern war industry in the US operates. It has served us well. We should not be so nieve to assume the US did all of this in a vacuum. No, we had and paid for plenty of systems design and information sharing about that.
Making this part of law makes it legally credible and also carves out most likely a budget allocation that focusing solely on the US-ISRAELI arsenal co development. I am not against such a provision. It is good we state what priority we make in allocating money to proven results.
God Bless America
I concur in large part. However I sincerely believe we have zero national strategic interests in Ukraine. We should not provide them anything. They’ve been at it with Russia for hundreds of years. It’s a corrupt dump of a nation. Not a single national strategic reason we have any business with Ukraine.
Agreed!
Israel is a one-way check valve for weapons tech.
What we don’t ‘share’ they steal. What PRC and Russia want, they sell. Example?
https://usahitman.com/patriotmissiles-china/
Just say NO to military support to Israel.
THE WAY we lost ” OUR ” Tech on RADAR and SONAR …
WELL
1) WE KNOW that SHE TAKES COUNCIL WITH ” UNKNOWN ” STAFFERS
2) HER STAFFER Did NOT MONITOR a FLOOR VOTE ( blamed for HER MISSING the VOTE )
3) she GETS BOTOX Injections…
4) imo – DEFINITELY HAS ” GONE Native ” District of Columbia
FIRE HER also
ALSO —> WHY WERE the Representatives of Guam and Territories EVEN ALLOWED to VOTE in COMMITTEE ?
https://moylan.house.gov/media/press-releases/moylan-advances-nearly-19-billion-for-guam-as-house-armed-services-committee-approves-fy2027-ndaa
So commenters are against this technology sharing arrangement? Israel is one of our closest allies and may I remind everyone what group of individuals (Jews) are namely responsible for the US producing the Atomic bomb and Edward Teller being he father of the H-Bomb. The Israeli’s are very smart and very skilled at weapons of war. It’s in the best interests of the US to he technically aligned and partnered to believe otherwise is simply naive. Any nation that can use pagers to blow your dicks off then blow your head off when you switch to a phone for safety for fear of pagers is a nation I would partner with on advanced weaponry any day.
Sundance, Have you ever actually worked with the Israelis on sensitive SCI and SAR/SAP programs and their related issues etc? I have and it (even its current form) is WAY more than just the Camel’s nose. The moment you say ITAR once this actually happens and goes forward, you will be ending your career even if you are a GS or GM 14/15. This is insanity on a scale I have never seen before and my career was from 1969 – 2013.