October 15th – 2019 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #999

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.


This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Stephanie Grisham Twitter @StephGrisham45

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

859 Responses to October 15th – 2019 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #999

  1. iswhatitis says:

    New Official survey by President Trump:


    (The questions are, ahem, “leading”; but it was still fun to answer them and to do that little bit of showing support).


  2. linda4298 says:

    Bingo : https://hollywoodlife.com/2019/10/15/cardi-b-donald-trump-winning-2020-election-president-interview/ Cardi B predicted, with dismay, that Donald Trump will not only not get impeached, but win the 2020 election. She explains why in a new interview on T.I.’s podcast.

    Cardi B is an enthusiastic Democrat who once interviewed Senator Bernie Sanders, but she doesn’t believe any Democratic candidate can win the 2020 presidential election. Cardi, 27, said during her October 15 appearance on T.I.‘s podcast expediTIously With Tip that Donald Trump‘s bigger pool of supporters is going to land him a second term in the Oval Office. “I really hate to say it, but sometimes I do believe that Trump will be winning just because… every single time, I don’t see nobody saying that they love a Democratic candidate. There’s no Democratic candidate that people say, ‘We love. We want them to win,’” Cardi explained.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The Democratic Party, Inc. does not have a viable candidate.”

      In their so-called “debates,” 100% of them are bashing the existing POTUS, but 0% of them are talking about what they would do – and, how they would actually get it done – if they were sitting in that “the buck stops here” chair.

      Frankly, I think that I am witnessing the self-destruction of an American political party. Which, by the way, has happened many times before: “times change, the country changes, and the party in question does not.” Buh-bye!

      Donald Trump is holding up a candle. And, inexorably, every one of his opponents is flying ever closer ever closer ever cl phhhphht! 🙂

      Liked by 4 people

      • CNN_sucks says:

        What is so sweet about it. Piglosi is commandeering the ship. Slow motion titanic. All aboard.

        Liked by 1 person

        • In a real world without constant media propaganda, which demrat should win? Stop, take a deep breath, and try to picture any/ each candidate sitting in the oval office. Picture anyone of them mixing it up at a G-20 conference. A Summit with Putin, Kim, or China? Then, exhale that deep breath……and gag!


  3. CTH Fan says:

    So the Coup Committee has changed the rules and now instead of just closed door testimonials from witnesses they are now closed door depositions. Leaky Schiff can reveal whatever he wants and everyone else has to keep quiet.

    Since when did a Congessional Committee become a court of law within the bowels of Congress?

    Does this mean that the Senate cannot call these same witnesses because they would be prevented from asking questions in view of the ongoing Coup Committee Kangaroo Court?

    We are not just heading toward Communism, we are in fact witnessing a Communist takeover. A gift from George Soros.

    Nobody, and I mean NOBODY in the Senate or Justice Department is willing to stand up for the Constitution of the United States. It seems civil liberty and constitutional rights can be denied to the President and Commander in Chief at the whim of a senile Speaker and her cohorts.

    The Dem debates are just theatre. They all know what Pelosi and Soros is up to.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Publius2016 says:

      You make a valid point which shows you that the Senate is Deep State Central…any true Republican would defend 45 from “Presidential Harassment” but the fact three Senators can flip to Independent on a moment’s notice shows the UGLY TRUTH!


  4. linda4298 says:

    WAIT – IF THEY WON’T HOLD A FORMAL VOTE TO START THE INVESTIGATION, HOW WILL THEY VOTE TO ACTUALLY IMPEACH?! – Pelosi Informs Democrat Caucus There Will NOT be Formal Floor Vote to Launch Impeachment Probe – It’s a Scam! https://thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/just-in-pelosi-informs-democrat-caucus-there-will-not-be-formal-floor-vote-to-launch-impeachment-probe/ via


  5. Reserved55 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Reserved55 says:




  7. linda4298 says:

    Hugh Hewitt column https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/15/trump-should-hit-reset-next-falls-debates/ Oct. 15, 2019 at 3:35 p.m. EDT
    Last week, the Commission on Presidential Debates announced the schedule of 2020 presidential debates. President Trump should quickly dismiss that schedule as unacceptable and announce that if any debates will be held at all in 2020, it will be only after extensive, direct negotiations between him and the eventual nominee of the Democratic Party and their respective designated representatives. And those negotiations should begin from a premise that the Republicans will no longer play by the biased rules of a deeply unbalanced Manhattan-Beltway media elite. Explicitly articulating this declaration of intent now, along with the possibility that, as in 1968 and 1972, there won’t be any debates, would do both the public and the elite media a great service

    Liked by 4 people

    • jrapdx says:

      True, given the current crop of potential Democrat candidates, American citizens don’t need any debates to know how they’ll cast their votes. Especially true if the format and moderators are inherently biased against the President—no purpose would be served in going ahead with debates.

      I’m sure PT won’t agree to anything that’s unfair toward him. If the media insist otherwise, the President would simply not participate.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Reserved55 says:


    • It is not merely “antithetical,” but Unconstitutional!

      The Founders left many records of their debates on the Impeachment issue. We know that they purposely omitted “maladministration,” a thorn in the side of English law which is very-vaguely defined as follows:

      The definition of maladministration is wide and can include:

      Incorrect action or failure to take any action
      Failure to follow procedures or the law
      Failure to provide information
      Inadequate record-keeping
      Failure to investigate
      Failure to reply
      Misleading or inaccurate statements
      Inadequate liaison
      Inadequate consultation
      Broken promises

      They specifically intended their wording to mean that “the offender is either now in trouble with the law, or is about to be.” They debated but stopped short of requiring an actual judicial indictment to be present (thus injecting the Third Branch explicitly), but explicitly indicated that an indictment … and everything else that goes with it … would clearly and immediately follow.

      What they did not(!) want to create was what the Democrats now seek to apply: “a purely political process,” where the Legislative Branch can exert arbitrary power to remove(!) the Executive.

      By including “high crimes and misdemeanors,” they [documented that they …] intended to expressly involve the Judiciary, but to do so implicitly. The Legislature was not bound to act until the Judicial Branch had acted (thus possibly being thwarted by that Branch), but it was restrained from acting except when a Judicial act was imminently forthcoming. (Thus, both of the other two Branches are party in the ultimate decision.)

      Yes, more than two hundred years ago now, the Founders did(!) anticipate “what the House is up to.”

      Liked by 2 people

  9. bessie2003 says:

    Is John Bolton the “whistle-blower” who isn’t really a whistle blower but is working with Schiff et.al. to set up the narrative there’s a whistle blower because Mr. Neocon got fired? And in their kitchen cooked up two or more committed deep state workers to be the front, or faces, for their scheme?


  10. Troublemaker10 says:

    Bolton is a realist and a warhawk. He was really tough when he was the UN Ambassador. He was just not a good fit for the Trump Doctrine agenda. However, I seriously doubt he is one of Schiff’s whistleblowers. It would be totally out of character for him.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Troublemaker10 says:

    Trump is on his way to an easy win in 2020, according to Moody’s accurate election model


    –President Donald Trump will win reelection easily in 2020 if the economy holds up, modeling by Moody’s Analytics shows.

    –“If voters were to vote primarily on the basis of their pocketbooks, the president would steamroll the competition,” the report states.

    –Three models show Trump getting at least 289 electoral votes and as many as 351, assuming average turnout.

    –The Moody’s models have been backtested to 1980 and were correct each time — except in 2016, when it indicated Clinton would get a narrow victory.


  12. Troublemaker10 says:

    US manufacturing entering a ‘golden era’ under Trump, says auto parts billionaire and NFL owner


    Shahid Khan, an auto parts billionaire who also owns the NFL’s Jacksonville Jaguars, is extremely encouraged by the state of manufacturing in the United States.

    “I’ve been in an auto parts factory for 50 years. Times in the U.S. have never been better,” Khan said Thursday on “Squawk on the Street.” “We’re entering the … golden area for American manufacturing right now.”


  13. sunnyflower5 says:


  14. meadowlarkspring says:

    Interesting backstory….the writer faults the Ukranian AG rather than the US ambassador for the diplomatic-politcal brouhaha in March of 2019. That’s being too generous, in my opinion. It seems to me okay to be pissed off in a Ukranian election season if a US ambassador wades into the mix.


  15. sunnyflower5 says:


    • listingstarboard says:

      Virginia Red? not so sure. Sad story about Nevada.


      • Janie says:

        And Colorado. Was an organized and effective takeover now being implemented in other states. This book explains it “The Blueprint: How the Democrats Won Colorado (and Why Republicans Everywhere Should Care)
        by Adam Schrager


  16. jeans2nd says:

    Anyone up for some Wilburine tonight?
    Sec Ross discussed the latest US-China trade deal with Lou Dobbs tonight.

    The discussion is interrupted by Adam Shitt’s talking in tonight’s Pelosi/Shitt press conference, and Sec Ross comments on the Socialist democrats latest hoax and witch hunt. Then Lou gets back to dressing down Sec Ross on China’s treatment of the US (not a criticism, am lovin’ some Lou Dobbs).

    Sec Ross is surprised when Lou says the Chinese have already reneged on last Friday’s deal to buy 40-50 mil of soybeans.

    Sec Ross says Chairman-For-Life Xi and Pres Trump should be meeting in a couple weeks at the ASEAN conference, and expresses hope that things will be worked out there.

    Actually a good conversation and back-and-forth between Lou and Sec Ross. 11:13


  17. lieutenantm says:

    dennis morrisseau
    Fire Wray today if he does not relent today.

    Make TULSI GABBORD YOUR VP………after the Dems freeze her out….”healing the country” and UP with women!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s