December 10th – 2018 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #690

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.


This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Sarah H Sanders Twitter @SHSanders45

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,076 Responses to December 10th – 2018 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #690

  1. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Liked by 3 people

  2. ARW says:

    The dems/MSM, like spoiled children, keep upping the ante because nothing is working. Russia, collusion, impeachment, jail…I suppose the next levels are life imprisonment and then lethal injection.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. kinthenorthwest says:


    Liked by 3 people

  4. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 4 people

    • avi says:

      yes we do


    • youme says:

      “The U.S. Attorney claimed that redacting the search warrant application “is not practicable” because the warrant is “interwoven with sensitive investigative information.”

      Some of the best redactors in the world work at the Justice Department


      • California Joe says:

        Almost every federal search warrant is laced with varying sensitive information including confidential tax, banking, investment, and proprietary business transactions, secrets and formulas. On top of all that there will transcripts of emails, text messages and phone conversations as well as information from confidential informants and other law enforcement sources. I have never seen the affidavit for a search warrant that wasn’t turned over to the defense!


  5. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  6. linda4298 says: Asked if he had any concerns that Trump was implicated, Hatch told CNN: “The Democrats will do anything to hurt this President.” Informed it was alleged by federal prosecutors in New York, Hatch said: “OK, but I don’t care, all I can say is he’s doing a good job as President.”

    Other senators questioned whether the allegations from Cohen that Trump was involved were credible, given the source was a known liar. Trump on Saturday denied that he directed Cohen to make the payments.

    “As long as Cohen’s a liar, I shouldn’t give much credibility to what he says,” said outgoing Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, who will run the Finance Committee next year.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. linda4298 says: Was Chris Matthews suddenly struck by some semblance of fairness? Or is the Bill Clinton fan, and the man who has described notorious womanizer JFK as a “hero,” reluctant to condemn presidents for their peccadilloes?

    On his Hardball show this evening, Matthews suggested that impeaching a President over sexual misbehavior would be a “witch hunt.” Said Matthews, posing the question to Dem Rep. Hakeem Jeffries:

    Liked by 1 person

  8. linda4298 says:

    But The New York Times today quotes the incoming chairman of the House Judiciary Committee saying – Jerry Nadler saying, “if the campaign finance case as laid out by prosecutors is true, Mr. Trump would be likely to meet the criteria for an impeachable offense.”
    Mr. Nadler said he was not convinced that Mr. Clinton committed perjury or obstructed justice, but that even if the President did, the offenses would not be impeachable.

    “An impeachable offense is an abuse of Presidential power designed to or with the effect of undermining the structure or function of government, or undermining constitutional liberties,” No-Nads told several hundred people at the recent town hall meeting at the Fashion Institute of Technology.

    1998 – Federal judge Susan Webber Wright begs to differ with No-Nads, the fat lying gasbag from New York:
    In a biting, 32-page opinion, U.S. District Judge Susan Webber Wright of Arkansas said Clinton gave “false, misleading and evasive answers that were designed to obstruct the judicial process” in Jones’s sexual harassment lawsuit.

    In other words, perjury and obstruction of justice.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s