Kangaroo Court – Christine Ford’s Attorney Agrees to Testimony(?) – Michael Bromwich Joins Ford Legal Team…

The professional political-left have turned the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh into an absolute kangaroo court.  The latest reports are that Ms. Christine Blasey-Ford has agreed to a senate hearing next week, well, maybe.

A letter from Team Ford (outlined below) carried multiple caveats and vague terms for appearance that cast doubts on the seriousness of the accuser to appear.

Additionally, and with another level of bizarre overlay, Michael Bromwich is now joining Debra Katz to represent Ms. Ford.

Michael Bromwich was/is the legal counsel of fired FBI Director Andrew McCabe; and Bromwich’s appearance within the current scheme only serves to underline the political nature of the current resistance maneuvering to block a Brett Kavanaugh confirmation.   Bromwich is directly connected to the usurping Lawfare group leading the DC resistance. At this point, the fiasco is an embarrassment upon the Senate; then again, that’s likely part of the strategy.

Perhaps strongly plausible – Team Ford is paying off the legal debts of McCabe hence the hiring and representation of Bromwich as part of a reciprocity deal.  According to CNN insider Laura Jarrett, Bromwich has to resign from his law firm to join Team Ford.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Election 2018, media bias, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Supreme Court, Typical Prog Behavior. Bookmark the permalink.

905 Responses to Kangaroo Court – Christine Ford’s Attorney Agrees to Testimony(?) – Michael Bromwich Joins Ford Legal Team…

  1. IMO says:

    Kimberley Strassel on Twitter: “1) Breaking, and a big deal: Fourth person that Ford named as present at infamous event denies even knowing kavanaugh, much less ever attending a party where he was present.”
    https://mobile.twitter.com/KimStrassel/status/1043678175941677056?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1043678175941677056&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftruepundit.com%2Ffourth-person-christine-ford-named-as-being-at-party-just-said-she-doesnt-even-know-kavanaugh-there-was-never-any-party%2F

    Liked by 4 people

    • Enoch Root says:

      So why bother having a hearing? We don’t even know the extent of the allegations because the accusations are not under oath so can change without legal consequences. It’s all just delay tactics and Grassley swallowed it hook line and sinker.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Bogeyfree says:

        No it’s all about smear IMO with the TV cameras rolling.

        Just imagine all the disgusting questions they will ask Kavanaugh about his HS life as a minor.

        It’s the Deep States version of show and tell.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Bo Cat says:

          That’s why they want Kavanaugh up first, go full Dem retard making all kinds of claims to dirty him. Christine Ford will never appear, she has no plans to, she has nothing to gained be being challenged in public. It’s all about having a claim with no proof or witnesses, making it stick for pure DNC PR for in the #metoo culture

          Like

      • Elizabeth Borneman says:

        The accusations/ testimony is under oath, perjury lying to congress is against the law

        Like

  2. zooamerica says:

    Thank you ,Diane Feinstein.

    Thank you, Dr. Ford.

    Dianne got dissed by the DNC and now it’s time for payback.

    Honestly, I think Dianne and Dr. Ford are on OUR TEAM!

    They’re not stupid. They knew exactly what would happen….

    They knew it would backfire on the democrats….they’re not dumb!

    Like

  3. Troublemaker10 says:

    Excerpt:

    “Simply put,” Walsh said, “Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”

    The lawyer acknowledged to CNN that Keyser is a lifelong friend of Ford’s.

    Keyser is the latest person alleged to be at the party to say she has no recollection of it.

    “I understand that you have been identified as an individual who was in attendance at a party that occurred circa 1982 described in a recent Washington Post article,” a committee staffer wrote Keyser earlier this week.”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Convert says:

      If there was any sanity, any decency, any basic integrity left in DC, THIS NEWS WOULD SHUT THIS DOWN! It’s a travesty that Judge Kavanaugh, his family, and the American people are being put through this despicable mess.

      Liked by 4 people

    • CNN_sucks says:

      Good news. Who are they going to believe now? Four has already denied. Keg party girl is tossed. She just made a fool of herself and dragged her family to an embarrassment. Who needs a therapy now when the accusation blows up on her face?

      Liked by 1 person

    • ledygrey says:

      Did Christine Ford name these four individuals? Why would she do that without first insuring that each of them would back up her story?

      Liked by 2 people

      • TatonkaWoman says:

        Umm…because everyone is just suppose to believe everything she says. “Victim” doncha know.

        Liked by 3 people

      • G. Alistar says:

        Desperation, coupled with confirmation bias and a fatal case of TDS all combined to make them believe the lies. Perhaps the desire to be a heroine of the “viva la resistance.”

        Liked by 1 person

      • satenniskristy says:

        Exactly my question! I get TDS etc., but out of all vague details she could have given to boost the appearance of her story’s credibility, why give names of 4 people who could possibly deny the party even existed (and now all have denied it)? Like you said, without ensuring they would back her up. Seems very strange. Why risk something so very risky? Why be so stupid?

        You would think for a party where there was only five people in attendance and one abruptly left that the others would notice that her friends would notice something was wrong as she departed. If what Dr. Ford alleges is in fact true, why would she leave her friend— the only other female there— with alleged attempted rapists?

        Like

      • dayallaxeded says:

        One word:. delusional!

        Like

  4. Troublemaker10 says:

    At this point and time, with all four witnesses she claims we’re there saying it didn’t happen….

    Why is she even bothering to show for testimony?

    I think this establishes good reason for Grassley just to hold the vote Wednesday at the latest. Hopefully he’ll do it sooner.

    This also is going to destroy people like Gillibrand, Kamala Harris, and Spartacus if they run for president in 2020. They falsely accused someone with zero evidence of anything. Who does that?

    Liked by 7 people

    • mimbler says:

      Besides there being no point, she opens herself to legal jeopardy should she testify to something 4 other people will testify is untrue.
      Amusingly (at least to me) she is the only one she has named that was in attendance that refused to make a statement to Grassley’s investigators (those statements are subject to perjury penalties for lying).

      Liked by 3 people

    • Zorro says:

      Who does that? People who think that their actions will not result in karma returning to them because they, the enlightened elitists, don’t believe in God.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Troublemaker10, “Who does that?”
      Someone who knows that media is not going to ever question them and hold their feet to fire for this charade.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Jan says:

      IMHO, the Me Too movement is just getting started: to convict, prevent, resist, etc., any white man running for an office anywhere, at any level. You notice that Rep. Keith Ellison is not getting any negativity or air time, even though he may be on video abusing his girlfriend, has more than 1 girlfriend alleging assault, hospital records, etc. This is perfectly ok for Muslim men–it is part of their culture, soon to be ours. Kamala Harris slept her way into politics; she went to law school; she KNOWS that Kavanaugh is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But we are no longer entitled to the presumption of innocence if you’re a Republican; especially if you are chosen by Pres. Trump for an appointment. Judge Kavanaugh is just the latest on the list.of Dimms who they trash “for the greater good.” Once again, we have been had!! Unless Sen. MCConnell grows a huge set of b**ls, No Kavanaugh & 8 SCOTUS until 2020. WHY the RINOs favor loosing to give Dimms back both houses this fall, says how compromised they are by Soros and the like.

      Like

  5. Just Steve says:

    I see it’s being reported Flake will vote “present”.

    Like

  6. JoD says:

    With the extremely limited information that has been made public, it is impossible to formulate a fact-based opinion. However, Grassley and his team should have plenty of usable data.
    Perhaps, just perhaps, Chuck has info that would incriminate Ford and exonerate Kavanaugh.
    This could explain his eagerness to accomidate Ford. It would be imperative that Chrissie testify and under oath. Maybe, it’s a trap!……We can dream, can’t we?

    Liked by 3 people

  7. Liked by 1 person

  8. Golfbro11 says:

    She is not going to testify. It’s all a dog and pony delay show. She won’t recant and she won’t testify under oath. They were hoping Kavanaugh would withdraw. They got called by the VSG

    Liked by 4 people

  9. Bogeyfree says:

    I guess Bromwich doesn’t have to resign after all unless he represents clients in potential slander suits

    Like

  10. Bogeyfree says:

    Now we know what the Pro Golfer angle was. It was Leland.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. magatrump says:

    Is it too late for Kavenaugh to get confirmed by Senate rules if Ford testifies this Thursday?

    Like

    • Ken says:

      No. He might miss the first couple of cases on the SC docket as he won’t be able to vote on any cases that he missed oral arguments. If he is seated first half of October, he won’t miss much.

      Like

  12. Zorro says:

    Guess who this all comes around to? None other than Queen Conspirator Hillary Hamrod Clinton who started the “all women must be believed” narrative in spite of having a predator hubby for which NO accuser can be believed! This is in ADDITION to all her fine work in the Russian hoax.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Red says:

    Sorry if this is a repost, but Judge Jeanine said Kavanaugh’s Mom was the Judge the ruled in favor of foreclosure on roundheels girl’s parents home in the 90’s.

    Like

    • jbowen82 says:

      Not true. Yes, she was the judge on the case, but apparently the mortgage got worked out between the Blaseys and the bank, the case was dismissed by Judge Kavanaugh (the elder), and the Blaseys are still in the house.

      Like

  14. JX says:

    The left haven’t turned the hearings into a kangaroo court, Chuck Grassley has.

    Like

    • TimesUp says:

      Bingo, couldn’t agree more. An own-goal if there ever was one.

      Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      I was harsh on him yesterday but not so upset about it today. He’s going to call her bluff. She was the one demanding a hearing but then had to make up a bunch of laughable excuses for not being able to attend on Monday (email probs, Yom Kippur, can’t fly due to discomfort with confined spaces, dog ate paper, etc). Another small delay isn’t going to hurt. And this way the Dems cannot blame the GOP for shutting Blasey down. Kavanaugh WILL be confirmed. We will win again, as usual.

      Like

  15. iswhatitis says:

    Christine Ford: “I was assaulted by that man. I HAS WITNESSES!

    Every witness: Nope, never happened. I wasn’t there. In any case, that man is nothing like that and never was like that.

    Christine Ford: You can’t believe what the witnesses say!. Nothing happened to them! It happened to me, not them. I HAS WITNESSES!

    Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      The friend Blasey said was at the party said she was never at a party that Kavanaugh attended. Blasey’s attorney then said that the friend couldn’t recall the party because Blasey never told her about the assault. That doesn’t even make any sense at all. They are completely laughably pathetic. Email probs, Yom Kippur, can’t fly on airplanes, demand a hearing but then do everything possible to delay, and now hire McCabe’s defense attorney … even some Dems can’t put up with this stunt. lol

      Like

  16. Jimmy Jack says:

    The extent they’re going to go get to Trump is staggering.

    Like

    • TimesUp says:

      Close – the extent they are going to protect their racket against YOUR interests and MINE.

      President Trump is the messenger and their behavior wouldn’t be an iota different if another person was doing to them what he is doing to them. Bless him for what he is doing. He is a true “man for others” and through his ACTIONS he is showing who in DC are for the people and who are for themselves.

      More sunlight please.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. Jane Smith says:

    This boils down to a fight over abortion.
    The Left will lie, cheat, and steal.

    Like

  18. I would like to know whether or not Judge Kavanaugh will be presented with a written complaint. Also, will either side be able to call witnesses? If so, how long will the process play out? Can a criminal complaint be tried in a political venue? Any lawyers out there?

    Like

  19. covfefe999 says:

    Is Bromwich going to ride with the nutcase during her cross-country roadtrip? 🙂

    Be on the lookout for nutcase at airports in the future. But then I suppose she’ll say she was cured by therapy.

    Like

  20. covfefe999 says:

    I’m predicting a Blasey INJURY now. She’s going to fall off of a ladder or something thus preventing her from making her excellent adventure road trip this week. 🙂

    Like

  21. 4sure says:

    former DOJ inspector general Michael Bromwich has joined Christine Blasey Ford’s legal team.

    So much for IG’s being unbiased. Past or present.

    Like

  22. Oldskool says:

    The accuser’s insistence for the FBI to investigate would provide the cover for not answering questions during the hearing, remember the dem deflection, “can’t answer that question because of an ongoing investigation”. She just won’t show up Thursday unless we get news most likely Wednesday evening of the FBI opening and investigation, got a beer bet on it.

    Like

  23. DSP2 says:

    If she is not physically in a car by monday heading east then Mister Grassley needs to schedule the vote this week.

    Like

  24. gueppebarre says:

    They intend to depose Kavanaugh on a bunch more non-related peccadillos from HS, such as throwing up in someone’s car, in an attempt to “Douglas Ginsburg” him – remember Reagan’s nominee who withdrew because he admitted to smoking pot? That’s what I see shaping up here. They wanted BK to testify first and their goal was to trash him and then not have Ford testify thereafter, leaving everyone to conclude that a horrible person like Kavanaugh MUST have done it.

    It’s so easy to figure these jackasses out, the only thing worse is the republicans acceding to it…

    Grassley – #1 on demo(hypo)crite sucker list! They are laughing their collective ample asses off at Grassley!!

    Like

  25. Nancy Ogden says:

    This is the most disgusting thing the Democrats have done in my lifetime. If the Republican don’t rise up to this ridiculous show of partisanship they and we deserve to go down in flames in the elections!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s