IG Report: Footnote #124, Page 164 – Clinton Email Investigation: “The Fix Was In”…

Within the Inspector General report into how the DOJ and FBI handled the Clinton email investigation, on Page #164, footnote #124 the outline is laid bare for all to witness. The Clinton classified email investigation was structured to deliver a predetermined outcome.

John Spiropoulos delivers the first video in a series of reports on the Department of Justice Inspector General’s review into the investigation of Hillary Clinton. This segment focuses on DOJ’s legal interpretation that virtually assured Clinton would not be prosecuted. And that, as the IG reports states, the FBI and DOJ knew that “by September 2015″…

…”The Fix Was In”

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, CTH Video Series, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, media bias, propaganda, Secretary of State, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

269 Responses to IG Report: Footnote #124, Page 164 – Clinton Email Investigation: “The Fix Was In”…

  1. Sayitaintsojoe says:

    I thought Clinton testified to having been instructed on how to handle classified documents when she first became sos. So how can she suddenly plead ignorance on the server and emails?

    Liked by 8 people

  2. Perot Conservative says:

    Other items we still need:

    1. Original, unredacted OIG report.
    2. FISA applications
    3. Page-Strzok texts – 65,000
    4. Real Huma laptop investigation

    Liked by 11 people

    • billsbowl says:

      They’ve got the guy who did Barry’s BC working feverishly creating #2 right now.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Cheesehead54016 says:

      I agree with all of the items needed but the biggest question of all right now has to be what was on the Weiner laptop that was said to be deleted Yoga emails that really weren’t Yoga emails. Those emails prove the willful destruction of govt records, and intent of destroying govt records. Also I’m sure there s plenty of Pay-for-Play Clinton Foundation stuff in those Weiner laptop emails. Dontchathink????

      Liked by 1 person

    • George says:

      Other items we will never see.


  3. redtreesquirrel says:

    I wondered when and if we’d ever see the day the Justice Dept had the goods on Hillary.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Ned Zeppelin II says:

    The private email server is a tougher case to make than pay-to-play at the Clinton Foundation, which leads to a subpoena for the entire contents of the Weiner laptop. Go for the easier target. All avenues should be pursued, but with all of the lies being difficult to challenge, better hunting in the Foundation and Uranium One fields of opportunity, Think.

    Liked by 2 people

    • softunderbelly says:

      Actually no. It IS the easiest case to make as that server was clearly illegal. However since Obama and the other Dept. Secretaries WERE communicating with her through that server and illegal emails, they couldn’t very well indict ALL of the White House. The case of the sailor who was pardoned by President Trump underscores the FACT that there was a double standard in play.

      Liked by 7 people

    • Clarioncaller says:

      There are mega-Deep State gatekeepers like Henry Kerner who are embedded in positions that control the flow of information and decide if any unlawful act will EVER be prosecuted.

      Liked by 2 people

    • MTK says:

      The classified material on HCR private email server is crime for every single piece, that is if there was 70 classified, secret and top secret documents each everyone of them is a separate crime and by definition every single one them that found their way onto the Weiner laptop are another separate crime.

      Having said all that, the Weiner copies of HCR Huma and HTC communications, HRC state department emails and emails that HTC would claim as private communications but any reasonable person would associate as off the book official communications to HTC official State Dept capacity.

      All these should be evaluated for RICO charges as related to Clinton Foundation. If in the course of discovery further more serious charges can be leveled such as treason, then so be it.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. WSB says:

    Huh?! Clinton’s conduct WAS gross AND criminally negligent. As was Huma’s.

    That was easy.

    Liked by 8 people

  6. peachteachr says:

    But General Petraeus.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. DeWalt says:

    Trump can just pardon anyone jailed in Club Fed that they never proved intent on. That would P.O. some fed judges, prosecuters, and agents.


  8. All Too Much says:

    I wonder if Horowitz has the legal research memo the FBI relied on for its ‘interpretation.’
    Who wrote it?
    Sally Yates?

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Clarioncaller says:

    The obvious question for Hillary’s lawyers must be, “Did you EVER use an official State Dept. sanctioned email address”? Because all indications show she NEVER set one up.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Right. And since the SOS deals a lot with classified info, that tells us that all of it came in and went out on that unsecured server.

      Where are the 30,000 missing emails Jeff Sessions…..You know.

      At least Comey used gmail–LOL.


      • Cheeshead54016 says:

        Weiner laptop……. how come there hasnt been a big announcement about the HRC content on Weiner laptop ? To me that holds key about missing emails, obstruction, pay for play, Uranium, Benghazi, and is Gross Negligence all wrapped up into one place. I wanna believe Sessions will still be known as The Silent Executioner.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Armchair Quarterback says:

      It is amazing how far this basic question goes towards illustrating her intent and purposes for the setting up of her “private unsecured” server. It would further indicate that all who communicated with her knew what she was doing. Think about it.


  10. stringplayer55 says:

    Even with this “fix” in place (which is also seen in the executive summary specification of what “charges” Hillarious would face), Clinton should have been charged criminally. In June 28, 2011, Hillarious affixed her name to a memo about email security which read, in part:

    “(d) Avoid conducting official Department business from yourpersonal e-mail accounts”

    That document from her should be enough to find that even with the restrictive parameters that the FBI and DoJ required, Hillarious should face charges that she was criminally negligent in handling emails.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. DeWalt says:

    This is interesting. Discovery would be interesting. Looks like the libs see a threat here. Maybe Judicial Watch should take his case. He’s not saying he isn’t guilty, just proving double standards.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. IMO says:

    Paul Sperry on Twitter: “BREAKING: Comey had SACs retaliate against field agents who spoke out about his mishandling of the Clinton email investigation. Some critical agents had OPR investigations opened on them.”

    SAC (special agents in charge)

    Liked by 4 people

  13. Lemmy says:

    Russian company asked for Mueller case to be thrown out because his appointment was unconstitutional. Pass the popcorn: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/indicted-russian-company-in-junk-bot-case-argues-appointment-of-mueller-violation-of-constitution-files-motion-to-dismiss-case/

    Liked by 3 people

    • C. L Roemke says:

      Great post, Lemmy.
      Wow, this really puts a clear focus on how Mr. Mueller runs an investigation.
      Now he’s going to get thrown out of court. Maybe out of ALL courts???
      Judges just don’t like to be made to look the fool.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. JAS says:

    Problem is, if they prosecute, and they can without a shadow of a doubt, Obozo will be caught in the dragnet, and them pols can have that.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. lieutenantm says:

    Hillary thought –and still thinks–she is God.
    OBAMA is sure she cannot be, because he is.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. Hillyard says:

    Of course Hillary could not be prosecuted. If she was, Obama would have had to have been as well. He used the same server and was one of 13 identified government “officials” who knew what she was doing with the server and her email and was just as guilty is she was/is.

    Liked by 2 people

    • margarite1 says:

      I suspect our side doesn’t want to take on the magic negro and the perennial victim and make martyrs of them. Unfortunately the truth is that could work against us – at least in the short term – like the mid-terms.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. Roy says:

    These were only the emails that FBI received from Clinton. All the marked classified emails were deleted and wiped (not with a cloth).

    Liked by 1 person

  18. zimbalistjunior says:

    judge Mukasey has been on cnn and fox and maybe others tonight…sounds reasonable, and well-informed
    am thinking he is on short list for some new role..what u say, treepers?


  19. Cathy M. says:

    “Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

    Translation: “No reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case” because a prosecutor would reasonably believe that they would be Fired if he/she did bring such a case.


  20. czarowniczy says:

    Soooooo…can the people in the press lately who’ve been caught at home with classified information use this Bureau decision as an affirmative defense?

    Liked by 1 person

  21. cajunbug says:

    So setting up the email server to traffic information to Clinton Foundation supporters is not intent?

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Sayitaintsojoe says:

    This isn’t her first rodeo when it comes to taking documents. She got a pass on travelgate and whitewater so why would this time be any different? Makes me wonder what she did with documents when she was carperbagging for the state of ny. Does anyone really believe she didn’t take documents then?

    Liked by 1 person

  23. William says:

    Truth, and you know it in your hearts: NOTHING will happen. Hillary will never ever be indicted or tried for crimes. Nothing is going to happen and nothing has happened. Dog and Ponny show is all we got. Sad.


  24. Donna in Oregon says:

    Dear AG Sessions,

    Hopefully you’re still reading thru the IG Report on Hillary Clinton’s emails. Not exactly cliff notes, but here is what I read this week:

    “Within the Inspector General report into how the DOJ and FBI handled the Clinton email investigation, on Page #164, footnote #124 the outline is laid bare for all to witness. The Clinton classified email investigation was structured to deliver a predetermined outcome.”

    Perhaps you will take some time with Christopher Wray and watch these videos I read about here:

    John Spiropoulos delivers the first video in a series of reports on the Department of Justice Inspector General’s review into the investigation of Hillary Clinton. This segment focuses on DOJ’s legal interpretation that virtually assured Clinton would not be prosecuted. And that, as the IG reports states, the FBI and DOJ knew that “by September 2015″…

    …”The Fix Was In”

    Still no justice. There is no reason given why there has been no justice. Waiting for years. Still waiting.

    Was Hillary Clinton a friend of yours from the Senate too? I see nothing has happened to the Senator’s involved in punishing the Tea Party I wrote you about last week. Must still be on your To Do List….all those US Senators that weaponized the IRS, FBI, DOJ, and other government agencies against the Tea Party members. Punished purely for their political beliefs, they were persecuted by your peers. Have you persecuted them too? Yes, by failing to act. Failure to act is an answer.

    If you truly love our country, please resign and take Rosenstein and Wray with you.



    Liked by 4 people

    • Nightstand says:

      Dear Donna, thanks for your concern. As to your request that I resign from being the U.S. A.G. No thanks. I enjoy the job fighting for you and representing the president. And the benefits and prestige is just to good to pass up. Jeff Sessions


  25. Justbill says:

    Here’s a good article from the Daily Caller that ties in with what we learned earlier from a CT
    H article. Also, correc5 me if I’m wrong, but I believe the email investigation has been reopened. If this gets buried, the NYPD needs to release their copy and just blow up the whole Clinton Crime Syndicate.



  26. OldSaltUSNR says:

    One thing for certain, Secretary Clinton’s precision with words about “marked classified’ clearly demonstrates that there was collusion between Clinton’s attorneys and the (apparently) anonymous Justice attorneys who reinterpreted Section 793 (f) (1) to mean the exact opposite of what Congress intended when the law was originally passed. It is not accidental that Clinton’s “understanding” of 793 (f) (1) mirrors the exact wording of the Justice finding.

    By the way, while there is no legal crime called “collusion”, there is a crime called “obstruction of Justice”. The reason why no one seems to know who wrote that Justice finding, is because it would be politically damaging to either Rod Rosenstein, or possibly Sally Yates or Bruce Ohr, to know that they wrote the legally obtuse finding to guarantee Hillary’s exoneration. Since I believe that Sessions and Rosenstein would throw Yates or Ohr under the bus in a second to protect themselves, my money is on Rosenstein as the great law reinterpretator at Justice, in behalf of future “President” Hillary.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. It would appear to me that Hillary “Rottentothecore” Clinton choreographed this entire seditious behavior on her own. She’s been absolutely corrupt her entire legal and political life, going all the way back to Watergate, where she was removed due to Constitutional and ethical violations, with no recommendations for referrals to benefit her career advancement. She’s rather like an “idiot savant” in many ways, I think. She knows exactly what she’s doing, yet is incapable of the worry of being caught in her dirty deeds or the guilt that naturally follows. She’s devoid of remorse for anything. In addition, due to the fact that she’s been involved in politics since Watergate (again), and has learned to the letter of the law(lessness) how our systems works, or will not, with the proper set up and wording. She knows precisely what the meaning of “is” is, as it relates to the law, in every endeavor she undertakes. To her, it matters not whether it’s constitutional or not. … My sincerest apologies if this difficult to read or understand. It’s very late, and I’m extremely tired. My eyes have been propped open with toothpicks, and it’s time to relieve them. Sleep sounds heavenly, so I’m all for that. Good night, all.


    • Jedi9 says:

      Your apparently just described the text book definition of a sociopath! There is no other way to describe HRC! Plain and simple! The sad part is our government is infested with these types of people!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Indeed. She is the epitome of a sociopathic narcissistic personality, with some added psychopathic tendencies to boot! Satanette is one evil swamp critter I’d like to see with some hemp around her neck. She certainly deserves it.


  28. JoeUser says:

    Just came across this article which, if what is reported is factual, could be the real reason for the Comey action for re-opening the Clinton email investigation:


    Feinstein is a real piece of work. She’s the roadblock for getting Lynch subpoenaed.


  29. Chilidog says:

    Did the IG determine whether or not this action taken by the doj was appropriate?


  30. Any current of former US Govt or US Military member who has had or currently holds any or all of the same level clearances KNOWS what BS this whole fiasco has been. I’m not going to plow old ground here. What I want to emphasize is, the position of Sec of State is by definition a “Classification Authority” position! So while feigning ignorance, HRC herself had the ability by spoken or written word to “classify or De-classify” everything she touched. Let that sink in


  31. Carolyn Dare Wilfred says:

    I am posting this in response to all of the democrats and others complaining about Trump taking children away from their parents who enter the US illegally. Look what the Clinton’s have done to us, through three countries (US/CAN/NZ) for over 20 years!

    Please pray for and help reunite Harmon and Carolyn Dare Wilfred (of Dare Foods, Canada)…forcibly separated by Clinton political retribution for almost 3 years now! (married for 20 years) And reunite Harmon with his estranged children who were taken from him and placed back into child abuse as the Clinton’s revenge…Harmon has no father’s rights what-so-ever! Gregory Greg, Bill Clinton’s attorney, said to us in a private meeting in Toronto 20 years ago, that “if you take your evidence on the Clinton’s to the US Justice Department (Horowitz), you will never see your children again”…they made good on that promise!

    Harmon Wilfred is a Clinton/CIA financial contractor/shadow government whistle-blower & Vietnam veteran (stateless & exiled in NZ; Carolyn in Canada) Follow the embezzled money taken from third world countries and US citizens, all the way to the Clinton Foundation. We need a miracle breakthrough! We are both Holy Spirit filled and pray in tongues…Praise God!

    Below are “Harmon Wilfred, America’s First Refugee” closing arguments to his 16 YouTube documentary case interviews (by CrowdSource the Truth, NY) posted on http://www.luminadiem.com (includes interviews with written outlines and evidential links)

    As Edmund Burke said, much more than 100 years ago: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil was that good men should do nothing.”

    Coincidence or Preponderance of Evidence – Closing Arguments

    – These are my Closing Arguments to the Court of Public Opinion – You be the Judge!

    – Wilfred v Canada PM Justin Trudeau, Clintons’ CRA “Financial Assassin”

    – Wilfred v New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern, Clintons’ “Jailer”

    – Wilfred v US President Donald J Trump, Clintons’ “Enabler?”

    Please join “Friends of Harmon & Carolyn” for progress updates: https://www.facebook.com/groups/225876718220946

    Twitter: @harmontweets #AmericasFirstRefugee #GetemAllFired #GlobalShadowGovernment #ExclusiveWorldCitizen

    Harmon can be contacted at: harmon@harmonwilfred.com
    Carolyn at cdw.wilfredinvest@gmail.com


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s