Maria Bartiromo Interviews John Podesta About House Intel Committee Testimony…

John Podesta is a long time Clinton political operative and all around political ‘fixer’ for both Bill and Hillary.   After Hillary left the role of Secretary of State (2013), there was an agreement between Hillary and President Obama that John Podesta would join the Obama White House team as a Senior Advisor to represent Clinton’s ongoing political interests.

What Valerie Jarrett is to Barack Obama, so John Podesta is to Bill and Hillary Clinton. In his role Podesta sat in on every meeting held by Senior White House officials, and had unlimited access to every aspect of the Obama administration until his exit in 2015 to work on the campaign.

During the 2016 presidential campaign Podesta worked as campaign chairman, overseeing the larger campaign and continuing his long-term role as a guardian, positioned to watch out for anything damaging to the Clintons.  John Podesta has always been the ‘fixer’.

Maria Bartiromo interviewed John Podesta earlier and inquired about his testimony to the House Intelligence Committeel and also the connections between himself, Hillary Clinton and various Russian groups.  Watch:


Podesta’s emails were targeted by hackers because the content therein was valuable intelligence.  Remember, from 2013 through 2015 Jon Podesta was a recipient of the President’s Daily Briefing (PDB).

This entry was posted in Conspiracy ?, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, President Trump, propaganda, Russia, Uncategorized, White House Coverup, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

169 Responses to Maria Bartiromo Interviews John Podesta About House Intel Committee Testimony…

  1. Noah says:

    Something I want to research is what happened to the media organizations that were revealed to have been infiltrated by various intelligence agencies such as FBI/Mockingbird, and further back, were bought out by some the early 20th century banksters, by placing editors in all the important papers of that day. Does anyone know of research that follows this lead? I don’t think these companies are operating for profit, and as many people suspect, I think it is likely there are still deep state groups directly controlling the editorship or other important positions within these organizations, but it would be great if that could be proven with hard evidence.

    Liked by 4 people

    • What needs to happen is that the propaganda law needs to be re-instated… I read that the budget for advertising went up to approx 5 billion a year during the Obama admin.

      Liked by 4 people

      • A lot of that advertising was public service radio ads on right wing radio companies. The Ad Council teamed with various professional associations was and is responsible for many of the ads – about Ocare, environmentalism, even nagging young people to save money. I used to wonder about that.

        Some of the newer talkers were very liberal, but I think they got tossed out when listeners complained. One guy was so bad, I turned the radio of at the first sound of his voice. Kinda how some of you are about Megan Kelly.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Kaco says:

      I don’t know but somebody posted that a bill had been passed that said government can lie to the public.

      Liked by 1 person

    • G. Combs says:

      Noah, I looked at that back in 2012.

      My research is HERE
      Essentially the Banksters via loans etc OWN the MSM and have their people on the board of directors.

      The Banksters also control most of the international Corporations. Academic Paper: the Network of Global Corporate Control

      This article, Financial Core of the Transnational Corporate Class, takes the above paper a step further and looks at the Top 35 Asset Management Firms and names names “[…]of 161 individuals represents the financial core of the world’s transnational capitalist class. They collectively manage $23.91 trillion in funds and operate in nearly every country in the world. They are the center of the financial capital that powers the global economic system. Western governments and international policy bodies work in the interests of this financial core[…]”

      The paper notes that the control is much greater than the $$$ would suggest. I figured out how this is done. It is done is via Pension Funds and Mutual Funds. The funds provide the $$$ but the managers VOTE THE STOCK not the owners of the $$$s.

      For instance when I looked at Monsanto, most of the stock, ~85%, is owned by Pension Funds and Mutual Funds. For example Divisions of Fidelity held total shares: 39,127,443 or 7.15% The founding Johnson family controls most of Fidelity Edward C Johnson 3rd is chairman of the group and votes that stock.

      Vanguard controls 37,496,850 or 5.7%, Another 6 investment firms like MORGAN STANLEY own between 2 and 5%
      So those ten people who vote 42.19% of that stock control Monsanto. AND they do not put up ANY of the money WE DO!

      Liked by 2 people

      • USMCLt says:

        Ordinary stockholders have seen their voting rights diluted by the mechanism you just described, much the same way we have seen our voting rights diluted by illegal aliens.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. deplorabledooku says:

    Pedodesta thought he could use the Bartiromo interview to spin his closed door meeting with the Committee. Funny how nothing has been leaked from that, which leads me to guess that there was nothing helpful for the liars to use against President Trump.

    Liked by 10 people

  3. Donna in Oregon says:

    Maria should have mentioned these two that tie together. 1) Podesta emails and State Dept conflict of interest, 2) Podesta Group and Uranium One.

    The Podesta Emails – Part 1
    Uranium Deal

    No One Mentions That The Russian Trail Leads To Democratic Lobbyists

    Thanks to the Panama Papers, we know that the Podesta Group (founded by John Podesta’s brother, Tony) lobbied for Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank. “Sberbank is the Kremlin…..

    That’s not all: The busy Podesta Group also represented Uranium One, a uranium company acquired by the Russian government which received approval from Hillary Clinton’s State Department to mine for uranium in the U.S. and gave Russia twenty percent control of US uranium. The New York Times reported Uranium One’s chairman, Frank Guistra, made significant donations to the Clinton Foundation, and Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 for one speech from a Russian investment bank that has “links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.” Notably, Frank Giustra, the Clinton Foundation’s largest and most controversial donor, does not appear anywhere in Clinton’s “non-private” emails. It is possible that the emails of such key donors were automatically scrubbed to protect the Clinton Foundation.

    Liked by 7 people

    • All Too Much says:

      Those would have been good. I’m just glad someone finally took a poke at the cabal.
      More will be revealed.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      More proof that Clinton colluded with Russia in cable from Wikileaks.

      In one cable sent to Clinton, U.S. officials in Brussels warned Russia was about to strong-arm U.S. ally Ukraine into a deal for “long-term supply of nuclear fuel” that could “shut” the U.S. company Westinghouse out of the market and extend Moscow’s influence over Europe.


      • Donna in Oregon says:

        Proof that the Dem Congress was involved too. They could have stopped it and didn’t, there was proof that Russia/Iran connection…..still let the deal go thru.

        This time, the proposed sale presents a test for President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton of their hopes to “reset” relations with Russia on a wide range of fronts.
        On one key issue, Rose Gottemoeller, the State Department’s assistant secretary in charge of arms control issues, confirmed in remarks to reporters in New York on Monday that the administration is pushing for ratification of a major new strategic arms pact with Russia in the Senate lame-duck session expected after the midterm vote.
        Some Republicans still have questions about the administration’s approach in the deal struck earlier this year, but Obama officials are pressing for a vote “as soon as possible,” Ms. Gottemoeller said.


        • Donna in Oregon says:

          This is the Russian Reset……this is the “flexibility” in 2012 hot mic. This is the scandal the Dims want to hide.

          By the way, Westinghouse bankruptcy…… Left our only nuclear company hanging out on purpose.


      • Donna in Oregon says:

        Proof that Loretta Lynch was asked to look into the sale of US uranium to Russia

        Senator Demands Top Cop Lynch Look Into Clinton Ties to Shady Uranium Deal

        Liked by 2 people

    • WSB says:

      The kicker is that Uranium One was not allowed to ship the goods out of the country. The clause was written so badly that they then hired an exporter who indeed did just do that.

      Collusion, indeed.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      Hillary Clinton Is Blaming Russia for WikiLeaks To Conceal John Podesta’s Russian Lobbying Ties
      10/24/2016 03:59 am ET

      Proof that John Podesta thru Tony Podesta was involved in the pay-to-play Uranium deal for Russia. The State Dept was lobbying for Russia while Hillary Clinton was SOS:

      The notion that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and John Podesta didn’t know Uranium One would eventually sell 20% of U.S. uranium to the Russian government ignores an inconvenient timeline. First, Podesta’s lobbying firm worked for Uranium One after half the company was owned by the Russian government. By 2010, Russia’s state-owned Rosatom controlled a 51% stake in Uranium One.

      Senate records show that The Podesta Group has lobbied the State Department on behalf of Uranium One — once in 2012, when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, and once in 2015.
      Uranium One paid The Podesta Group $40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service and the National Security Council for “international mining projects,” according to a July 20, 2012 filing.


      • Donna in Oregon says:

        Even the Huffington Post wrote about why the muh Russia scam really happened. I cannot believe anyone fell for the “because she lost the election”. That couldn’t be farther from the truth

        Liked by 2 people

  4. All Too Much says:

    Love it. He did not defend Hillary’s Uranium deal.


  5. Pam says:

    Liked by 2 people

  6. kyasgrandma says:

    One question I would like asked and answered: “Mr. Podesta, what exactly is your artistic appreciation of the painting you had hanging in your office? The painting that shows cannibalism?
    Is this a practice in which you participate?
    Do the words “pizza” or “pasta” refer to this practice? Or do they refer to pedophilia?
    I realize he would never agree to speak publicly with anyone strong enough to ask him.
    But I can wish.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. lisaginnz says:

    Podesta is so non believable it is laughable.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. skifflegirl says:

    That was difficult to watch. Knowing the despicable evil that man has caused and the horror those eyes have witnessed is not something I can stomach easily. God in heaven, please let justice prevail upon John Podesta.

    Liked by 5 people

  9. G. Combs says:

    Of interest from my 2010 notes.
    Remember the BP oil spill?

    BP hired Podesta group to do its lobbying and PR => John and Tony Podesta own Podesta group => Podesta (john) owns Center for American Progress AND Climate Progress.

    The Spill, The Scandal and the President

    June 2010: Politico: Poll for League of Conservation Voters
    by Benenson Strategy Group
    Oil Spill and Energy Bill Update
    The Senate may soon debate an energy bill that will limit pollution, invest in domestic energy sources and encourage companies to use and develop clean energy. It would do this in part by charging energy companies for carbon pollution in electricity or fuels like gas. Would you say you strongly support this bill, somewhat support, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this bill?

    » WSJ: BP Decisions Made Well Vulnerable –

    » BP’s Excellent Oval Office Adventure – Big Government

    » The Oil Drum | Deepwater Oil Spill – A Longer Term Problem, Personnel – and Open Thread 2

    Liked by 3 people

  10. Papoose says:

    He’s behind closed doors for one reason and one reason only: to protect the democrat representatives and senators that are involved with the swindle and corruption. Collusion.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Jay says:

    The old “17 intelligence agencies that know that Russia hacked dnc emails that aided Trump campaign” – the same old tired excuse that hilldog used. Notice he mentioned infowars – AJ diggin that!

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Beverly says:

    Podesta is vile, an absolute pit viper. It thinks it can lie, and lie, and lie, and get away with it. I love that Maria gave him no quarter and no mercy. What an odious little reptile he is.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Gueppebarre says:

    I notice that Bill Clinton hasn’t been asked to give another $500,000 speech to the Russians since Hillary bombed in the election. Hmmmmm….


  14. kirkreport says:

    Podesta’s attitude seemed indifferent at the beginning of the interview. But, Podesta went into high defense mode when Maria brought up his own affiliation with Russia. He became defensive. When she pushed the issue further, things got interesting. He adjusted his seated position sat up straighter and began to lie. As Maria continued to push Democratic ties with Russia, he then performs an insincere “laugh it off” technique. That’s when he bared his fangs (literally). When laughing it off didn’t work, he became indignant and began to fight. That didn’t work. He then tries to change the subject to Russia hacking emails. Podesta’s mannerisms changed as he developed a slight stutter, began to stammer, finding himself at a loss for words. He has nowhere to go. So he attempts to find a scapegoat.

    The modus operandi of a guilty man is plain to see here. First he was indifferent, then defensive, tried to laugh it off, became indignant, tried to change subject, then looked for a scapegoat.

    Guilty! Case closed! Great job Maria Bertiromo!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Scott says:

    Good interview, but I wish Maria had asked him two simple questions:
    “How were your emails hacked?”
    “Is it really true your password was baloney1?”


  16. Scarlet says:

    Hes the democrats ” fixer “.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s