June 19th – 2017 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #151

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.

trump-president-3

This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Sean Spicer Twitter @PressSec

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,188 Responses to June 19th – 2017 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #151

  1. Dora says:

    INFIDELS FIGHT BACK
    … as media struggle to give it a name

    The Finsbury Park Mosque, one of dozens in North London, has in the past produced more than its quota of Islamic terrorists including the shoe bomber and it was targeted for its deadly reputation.

    Did anyone believe the Poms would not eventually fight back after the slaughter of many UK citizens by mad Muslims over the past three weeks? The Infidels are also mad, this is war so how can they be blamed? But they will be!

    Muslims are calling this “White Supremacy Terrorism”… really? Maybe it’s just, “Enough is Enough Pom Terrorism”. CNN is struggling with what to call it under its PC rule book.

    http://pickeringpost.com/story/-/7268

    Liked by 9 people

    • JohnP says:

      When the players are reversed it doesn’t get the same coverage.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      There is no clear distinction between white supremacy and the multicultural mindset.

      Andrew Breitbart

      Liked by 11 people

      • I don’t know what he was trying to get at, but distinctions between those two are pretty clear to me. Maybe he was saying both are equally distorted views, but they are still different (distinct), and the distinction isn’t hard to identify.

        White supremacy has an orientation of “exclusivity” (this is better, the others are worse), which employs a linear hierarchy. The multicultural mindset attempts to be “inclusive” (all these are equal), and to reduce hierarchical structures by emphasizing similarities.

        The clear distinction is that they have opposite goals, and differing approaches to addressing conflicts between cultures.

        Like

        • Oldschool says:

          I think we fall into the trap of propaganda we are fed on multiculturalism if we believe their is no hierarchy. There most certainly is a hierarchy. They just don’t identify themselves with white robes.

          Liked by 6 people

        • mireilleg says:

          I think it goes further. Looking at community there is no distinction between the two. In a community of white supremacists (exclusive) if you do not subscribe to the ideals of the community you get excluded from it and asked to leave. In a globalist community (inclusive) when you fail to subscribe to the commun ideals, you will be rejected by the community and asked to leave (no longer inclusive, only inclusive if you agree with them). There is no distinction.

          Liked by 6 people

          • Perhaps. But the statement itself says nothing about “community”, and does not specify a behavioral context as you have. The quote is either incorrect, or poorly-worded and ambiguous.

            Like

        • LEET says:

          I find that the current progressive ideology on “multiculturalism” and “diversity” pushes the lie that these things somehow make societies “stronger and better” apparently just because they say so, as I have yet to hear a cogent argument as to how multiculturalism/diversity is inherently strengthening to societies. I see more problems than strengths. The first and foremost being those who refuse to assimilate into the society/culture that they are entering.

          Liked by 4 people

        • Aparition42 says:

          I think the difference between your argument and Breitbart’s is that he was addressing the actual course of what is being called “multiculturalism” while you are referring to what the words themselves should mean.

          Consider the way the left attacks “cultural appropriation”. They don’t think kids with different skin colors should wear the same clothes, eat the same foods, or listen to the same music. They are the new segregationists using Orwellian doublethink. When they say “multicultural”, they do not mean one group of individuals able to create their culture for themselves out of whatever aspects they choose. They mean that tribal groups should keep to themselves and not be allowed to share fashions, trends, recipes, and hairstyles across the lines of their arbitrarily chosen physical classification system.

          This “multiculturalism” is fundamentally the same as white supremacy because it preaches separation and animosity according to the false science of racism. Both fall under the blanket of collectivism where the individual must be subjugated to the specious concept of “society” as they pretend it to be. Their goals are the same. To keep individuals separated into distinct demographics for ease of categorization, antagonization, and politicization.

          Liked by 2 people

          • I understand your point, but again, Breitbart did not refer to any pragmatic or behavioral context in his blanket statement. He could have said, “White supremacists and multiculturalists have similar goals”, but he didn’t.

            Like

            • Aparition42 says:

              I didn’t say you wanted the quote defended, just explained. Brevity is the soul of whit. The initial statement is just a kicking off point for the discussion. It is designed to make people question what was meant by what he said. The following discussion causes people to ask for themselves what the two could have in common.

              Liked by 2 people

              • Aparition42 says:

                Thought of writing “you didn’t say” or “I didn’t think” and I ended up scrambling them.

                Like

              • I have benefitted from the explanations by those here, but still must agree to disagree about the effectiveness of the original statement. I find it misleading, and disagree that there are no clear distinctions between the two philosophic approaches. Their commonality of flaws does not overcome the differences, nor make them equivalents.

                Like

          • Grandma Covfefe says:

            Same with Islam (sharia radical) refusing to change to get along.

            By the way Breitbart died in 2012. He didn’t eyewitness the mass invasion of Europe and sneaky invasion of USA. Had he still been alive today, you can bet he would have clarify that statement and write up a newer one regarding what has been happening the last 3 years. No one forsaw this Islamic invasion, except for Deep State and their thugs. Because we were looking/listening to those’ shiny things’ (Hillary emails, Benghazi, etc.).

            White supremacy was the big news in the past. These days Islamic invasion is the big news and very scary.

            Liked by 1 person

            • 100% YOOPER says:

              Has anyone else noted that around the time Andrew B. died, there was an article on Drudge about a robot size of a fly (and could fly) could deliver and inject a poison? I have been mulling over this for years. Wondering if anyone else remembers this?

              Like

          • Jlwary says:

            My thoughts exactly. Well said.

            Like

        • indiana08 says:

          In multiculturalism the white liberals run the show and they want to rule over minorities because white liberals have “the bigotry of low expectations”. Look at who runs the EU for example. They want to eliminate other whites who challenge them and their ideas. White supremacist (like Hitler and the Nazis) wanted to get rid of anyone who wasn’t white. Both goals are the same, power for white liberals.

          Liked by 3 people

          • (See exchange with Aparition42.) I do appreciate the clarifications. It’s too bad AB isn’t around to explain what he tried (and failed) to say.

            Like

            • Grandma Covfefe says:

              No, AB didn’t fail. He, like the rest of us, didn’t see other extreme realities Islamic invasion, etc.) happening now which would have change his quote a bit. That is like scolding our Forefathers for not putting down laws about cars and airplanes back then. (I’m being extreme here, so don’t take it personally) It’s all ok.

              Nationalism and protectionism should be our number 1 concern and priority.

              Liked by 1 person

              • I don’t think it’s all that difficult to say what you mean to say, but blanket statements and provocative hyperbole don’t inform so much as inflame. That’s a problem with hyperbole, which is what I’m labelling the original quote.

                White supremacy and multiculturalism aren’t the same, and they don’t share the same worldview or use the same tactics. The two approaches may share some of the same flaws, but why not say so if that’s what is intended?

                Like

        • Donna in Oregon says:

          Please read the posts above. Interesting back and forth. Enjoyed reading all the different posts! 🙂

          Liked by 1 person

    • CleanhouseinDC says:

      They are trying to come up with a catchy “label” to trot out anytime there is a hint of “Islamophobia.

      “White Supremacy Terrorism” just doesn’t roll off the tongue like “Radical Islamic Terrorism”. They’ll no doubt have a few more to roll out if this one doesn’t catch on.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Grandma Covfefe says:

        CleanhouseinDC: White Supremacy Terrorism is old news. Radical Islamic Terrorism is the new reality.

        To others: Don”t be fooled by “White Supremacy Terrorism” labeling. It is nothing more than a ‘shiny’ statement to cover up the truth.

        Liked by 1 person

    • corimari2013 says:

      The media continues to whitewash the Koran.
      This morning on Fox & Friends viewers were told that the ‘violent extremist muslims misinterpret the Koran’.
      Not correct. Here is what an ex-muslim has to say:
      “…life under Islam is much different than the whitewashed version often presented by the Western media and Muslim pressure groups. That includes the Koran’s call to jihad, or “holy” war, against non-believers.
      It is basically a proscriptive demand found in the Koran when it comes to jihad – killing the infidels, spreading Islam until there is no other religion on earth except the religion of Allah…”
      http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2011/september/ex-muslim-speaks-out-about-the-koran-dilemma/?mobile=false

      Liked by 2 people

      • whuptdue says:

        The US developed a program to utterly and totally delegitimize political Shinto in Japan after WWII and the results speaks for itself. This nation as well as all Western civilization must accept that Islam is a religion as violent and dangerous as Shintoism and must be utterly and totally delegitimized to win the war for humanity and civilization as we know it. To continue to allow the practice of political Islam is the equivalent of legitimizing and legalizing sedition/treason as an act of faith. Enough already.

        Liked by 7 people

  2. missmarple2 says:

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/18/photos-melania-trump-caught-everyones-eye-in-this-outfit-after-returning-from-camp-david/?utm_campaign=atdailycaller&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social

    Lots of photos. Please go to the article so that they see a lot of people read it. Maybe they will get a clue and cover more of her fashion!

    Liked by 20 people

  3. A Russian canary on a string.
    Trump is dangling a Russian on a sting like a cat toy to make our enemies in the establishment reveal themselves, like a canary trap.
    They can not help but swat the Russian narrative, it is a cats nature.
    I hope he is surveilling them, making a comprehensive list, and they all go to jail.
    We may need to build some new prisons to hold them all.
    Or maybe we could release some less harmful criminals to make space, like some MS13 gangsters.

    Liked by 7 people

    • From Allen Dershowitz on Fox and Friends this morning, need to restrict the Special Counselor “scope” not only exclude PDJT obstruction of justice claims but also the Roberta Lynch obstruction of justice. Investigations/ snipe hunts may truly be a double edged sword and never know what information may be uncovered. It may be an honest concern or just getting too close to O&Clinton Inc. for comfort. A translation of a very old Chinese term for treatment (for necrotizing fasciitis), bear claw debridement, is very descriptive and instructive not only for dealing with major soft tissue infection but also major political malfeasance. In both cases you may have to cut broad and deep to remove the corruption so the patient can recover. In looking for a non-existent rational for “Impeach the President” it may have overshot the mark and emphasized the need to clean out the accumulated corruption from previous administrations. Now suddenly there are sharper minds trying to tone things down to save some swamp critters hides.

      Like

      • Kintbury says:

        I disagree with him completely. There is a big difference between imagining Trump may have committed a crime and what Lynch did. There is evidence she acted inappropriately and at the very least, she should have her license to practice law revoked. While your at it, take away Holder’s too.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Somebody says:

          I didn’t see the interview with Dershowitz, but he has staunchly defended POTUS and has been very critical of a special counsel being appointed. He’s been up front that he didn’t vote for, nor does he agree with POTUS on issues, it’s a constitutional thing. He has constantly asked where is the crime, special counsel is to be appointed to investigate a crime. He’s also said Russian “collusion”, if there were any is not a crime so why did Rosenstein appoint a SC.

          As I said I didn’t see the interview, but I would imagine his belief is including Lynch in the special counsel’s investigation would be expanding the scope of a SC he doesn’t think should be appointed in the first place. In this instance I agree with him. Let DOJ or a different special counsel look into Lynch or take the evidence before a grand jury, but DON’T find reasons to expand Mueller’s scope on anything…….quite the contrary narrow it or better yet get rid of the entire investigation.

          Liked by 2 people

          • rashamon says:

            Dershowitz also believes that Ted Cruz is a “natural born citizen” despite his father not being a citizen (and his mother’s citizenship is questionable). Dersh is not a dependable commentator on the law, but favors anyone and any comment coming out of HAHvard.

            Liked by 1 person

      • boot says:

        Mueller has assembled a large team because he must start from scratch in carrying out his own independent, comprehensive, thorough investigation of alleged criminal acts by the Russian government.to influence the election. He cannot accept the vague assessment by the IC that Russia acted illegally. He cannot blindly accept the results of the FBI’s investigations. Before he can prosecute any American individual for collusion he has to prove beyond any reasonable doubt that Russia committed a criminal act.

        One of the alleged criminal acts by the Russians was hacking the DNC server. Mueller cannot accept the DNC’s security contractor Crowdstrike’s view that the Russians did it. If he did accept Crowdstrike’s view then he would be considered to have failed to do his job as an independent SC. Therefore Mueller must conduct his own independent, comprehensive, detailed analysis of the DNC server “hack” …. the Leftists are probably starting to feel uncomfortable about what Mueller may find.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Somebody says:

          Lawyers are for indictments and lawsuits, investigators and cops are for investigating.

          Liked by 2 people

          • boot says:

            OK, but Mueller, a lawyer, previously headed the FBI. His team will include both lawyers and investigators including IT specialists. He must start his own investigation from scratch including analyzing and independently confirming every detail of any FBI investigations that have already taken place. As an SC, Mueller has no choice but to thoroughly, comprehensively and independently investigate and analyze every single detail in an unbiased manner. If Mueller fails to properly carry out these duties then PDJT can require the AG to remove Mueller as SC for one or more of the following ….. misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or other good cause, including violation of DOJ policies.

            Liked by 1 person

            • boot says:

              Possibly ….. but it’s also possible there’s a backup somewhere. However if the SC’s team cannot independently investigate the server hack then there is no evidence that Mueller can use to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Russia carried out a criminal act and therefore he cannot prosecute any American individuals that may have colluded with the Russians in this act.

              Like

            • RAC says:

              That’s the first I’ve heard about them being wiped. If it’s true then it’s the hillary MO all over again, destruction of evidence, guilty as sin.

              Like

        • mimbler says:

          I think the leftists are probably quite comfortable with the legal team of Obama/Clinton partisan donors Mueller has assembled,
          Mike

          Liked by 1 person

      • 4sure says:

        Dersdem is a liberal and a hard core dem. He will ALWAYS protect the Dimms and the Clinton/Obama corruption, no matter what. That’s why he does not want anyone looking into anything having to do w/Obama.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. NJF says:

    Terrible.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. NJF says:

    Trying to catch up this morning. Have they released the name of the van driver from last night? I haven’t seen it? Very suspicious.

    Like

    • The Boss says:

      It was a muzzie. Don’t expect much more from the PC London press or our propagandists.

      Liked by 1 person

      • El Torito says:

        Ah the Muzzies are finally reaching saturation there. Once this happens, it’s not only them against infidels, they kill each other over who’s vision of Islam is more correctly interpreted. Could be an encouraging sign.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Jim in TN says:

      Agreed, they tell us his age, but not his name. Suspicious.

      And, he rented a truck. Could have used a false I.D. and maybe they are double checking, or are trying to find and roll up co-conspirators before the media mess everything up. But there are enough pictures that somebody should have already called the media and told them ‘it’s my neighbor’, or coworker, or bar mate, or some such.

      Still, the longer it takes, the more suspicious it gets.

      Like

  6. Howie says:

    If The Left Wins Their Soft Coup, Everyone Loses – But Mostly Them
    Has anyone out there actually met a Trump voter who said something like this?

    I supported Trump, but now I don’t because his refusal to passively sit back and let a Washington insider with an obvious conflict of interest and his Democrat staff drive him out of office on the basis of a Hillary-driven lie far outweighs Neil Gorsuch, pulling out of the climate scam, beating ISIS, and repealing Obamacare.
    https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2017/06/19/if-the-left-wins-their-soft-coup-everyone-loses–but-mostly-them-n2342884

    Liked by 13 people

    • BAMAFan says:

      Well Kurt, don’t let the door hit you on the way out. 😎

      Liked by 6 people

      • You need to re-read the article. He didn’t say that.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Warrior1 says:

        You obviously have some reading comprehension issues.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Wiggyky says:

        Phil — I have said this and also that the families (parents, wives, brothers, sisters) of the media should be treated the same way they treat President Trump and his family. If they attack Barron then their own children should be included.

        Perhaps some who relish researching could start a list of reporters, their addresses and phone numbers. If it is good for the goose then it is good for the gander.

        Like

      • Wiggyky says:

        Oh my AbamaFan, what part of “Has anyone out there actually met a Trump voter who said something like this?” did you not understand? Kurt never said it himself.

        Like

        • BAMAFan says:

          I messed up by not going to click bait article, and instead relying on Howie’s interpretation. I have atoned for this sin and will take my punishment. 😩

          Like

    • Jim Smith says:

      Howie – did you miss the context of the quote?
      From the article…

      “Has anyone out there actually met a Trump voter who said something like this?
      …. “I supported Trump, but now I don’t because his refusal to passively sit back and let a Washington insider with an obvious conflict of interest and his Democrat staff drive him out of office on the basis of a Hillary-driven lie far outweighs Neil Gorsuch, pulling out of the climate scam, beating ISIS, and repealing Obamacare.”

      “Yeah, no. Not a thing.”

      Schlichter is making a point…. NOT dissing President Trump.

      Liked by 7 people

    • G. Combs says:

      Do not forget Salem Communications owner of Townhall is NEVERTRUMP GOPe

      “This week a Salem Communications insider steps forth (via email) to affirm all of the previous reports, and add details specific to the instructions from Salem Broadcasting and Salem Communications group:
      In 2014 (sorry, cannot recall the date), Salem Radio hosted a conference call with Senator Marco Rubio to address the Gang of Eight legislation and “set the record straight.” All national and local talk hosts were urged to take part. I am one of their local hosts, and what I heard that day was troubling.
      Moderated by Hugh Hewitt, it began with Senator Rubio offering a brief explanation of the measure and why it was so very necessary. Then Hewitt opened the call to questions. There were only a few, and they were exclusively from higher-profile, national Salem personalities, like Mike Gallagher, Katie Pavlich, and Mark Davis. No local host was permitted a question. Following the Q & A, Senator Rubio was cut loose, and that’s when things got weird.
      After Rubio departed, Hewitt introduced Salem V.P. Tom Tradup, who began by saying, “Thanks, Hugh. Now, here’s how I would like our talkers to be talking about this…” I exited the call in disgust at that point and have no idea what followed.
      The effort by the GOPe to co-opt the so-called “conservative media” is real, and it’s widespread. It also makes me gag.
      XXXXXX  (name intentionally withheld by CTH)”

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2015/09/03/transparently-predictable-political-maneuverings-within-msm-and-salem-communications/

      Liked by 3 people

      • PreNanny says:

        Exactly G thank you.
        I will never understand why otherwise good people continue to fund the enemy within.
        Oh well…
        MAGA

        Like

  7. BAMAFan says:

    Yeah, George Webb, super sleuth, now in Day 200 and whatever, really blew it in Charleston. I tried to warn readers here not to go down his pathways on Seth Rich. Now he’s developed quite a following who are chipping in to finance his quixotic adventures. BTW, we’re still breathlessly waiting for Kim DotCom to spill the beans on what he knows about Seth Rich and WikiLeaks. “Oh! What A Tangled Web We Weave When First We Practice To Deceive.”

    http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/16/media/port-of-charleston-dirty-bomb-conspiracy-theory-shutdown/index.html

    Liked by 3 people

    • Piper says:

      Bama- I was hoping to catch you in the treehouse-
      Remember I said some rude things to you, all over the ridiculous George Webb, (and I apologized), well, you were spot on and I have already eaten my crow.
      This guy is a total conspiracy theorist a’la Mel Gibson movie insane!

      Liked by 6 people

      • NC Mom says:

        I love Treepers! Willing to apologize. Willing to expose fraudsters and fake news. Remember: As Ronaldus Magnus used to say “Trust but VERIFY”. Keep Steve Scalise and the others in your prayers.

        Liked by 7 people

        • Corticram says:

          One of the reasons I was drawn to the Treehouse was the polite and courteous discourse amongst the people offering comments. There are other good sites but unfortunately the comments quickly sink into personal attacks. Huge turnoff!

          Liked by 1 person

        • cozette says:

          The two are totally different. Seth was murdered. There is alot to connect him with wikileaks and it is a fact that his murder shut down a court case into Clinton voter fraud. With russia there never was crime to investigate.

          Like

        • Grandma Covfefe says:

          Ditto! and still praying for Scalise.

          Like

      • BAMAFan says:

        You are redeemed. just trying to keep it on the up and up here.

        Liked by 2 people

    • ALEX says:

      It seems if you point out it would be nice to have some facts then that lone question infuriates ‘them’ even more. It happens on both sides. Here we are with a Russia/Trump hayride through conspiracy theories and others turn the Seth Rich murder into some vast conspiracy with no evidence to date…Just the Facts or maybe some evidence..Just a little please.

      Liked by 7 people

      • BAMAFan says:

        I’m with you Alex. I deal with facts and evidence. All the rest is sometimes interesting, but ya gotta go with what can be proved in a courtroom or other tribunal. BTW, a source deep inside a federal agency who knows a girl down the hall on the third floor says she overheard someone in the ladies room mention pizza. Think there’s a connection?

        Liked by 5 people

        • CaptainNonno says:

          There’s got to b someone who archives CCTV from that location. Nothing has even been intimated that video exists. Maybe when new FBI Dir gets on board?

          Liked by 1 person

          • I would like to know more about the DC police helmet cams and also about the whereabouts of Seth Rich’s computer. Nobody saying nothing it seems.

            Liked by 1 person

            • I also find it interesting that his own cousin believes he was murdered by the Clinton machine. There is a TON of things about this case that are, to say the least, “suspicious.” There are NO coincidences, IMO, and the either close or peripheral involvement of people connected to Wasserman-Shultz and the Podestas, the doctor’s wife/girlfriend’s involvement with the CGI, Podesta, and WH visits, are certainly troubling. Why are they not releasing the police body cam videos? Why have so many people who may have info on this subject not been interviewed by police? Where WAS Seth between the hours of 1:15 AM, the approximate time he left the bar to go to a different bar but never actually went there, and 4:18 AM, when he was allegedly shot? These issues bring up valid concerns, IMO, and I am purposely leaving out the other inconsistencies pointed out in anonymous posts. I am sure there are actions on-going behind the curtain and, from what I understand, Kim Dotcom said he would give his testimony directly to officials rather than continuing to speak publicly about the case. Considering that he has been charged with fraud, he has to consider his own legal situation.

              Like

      • thluckyone says:

        Oh, Alex – I LOVE it! Imagine Treepers “on a hayride” through conspiracy-land or through the “mardi-gras” with Trump-fans up on the hay-wagon or Trump-train throwing sweet-truth-candies out to cheering/ranting reality-hungry people. YES!

        Maybe it was you – maybe it was Nimrodman or someone else who said “Sundance, you need a bigger stage”. Well, I’m all for chipping in to the tip jar as often as possible until Sundance & crew are regulars on OANN or somewhere that has even larger exposure.

        AND, I think the CTH is doin’ pretty GOOD, as it is! Alex, THANKS for the inspiration!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Theoldbear says:

        Really, They took his wallet and cell phone you know LOL . Just one of those normal D.C. robberies that leave the victim with all his possessions and no investigation by the police. Give me a break! Probably just another suicide at Ft . Marcy Park…Move along Alex nothing to see here !

        Liked by 3 people

        • Bendix says:

          Someone (not on this site) got really irate with me the other day over the Seth Rich murder.
          He quoted to me from somewhere what the police guessed could have happened. As if the police constructing a possible scenario based on available evidence precludes any other possibilities. If that were the way things like this are handled, the police would have closed the case.
          This person argued that robberies were on the increase in that area. I’d have to check the source of that claim firsthand. I really don’t believe ARMED robberies were happening with any frequency, or Seth would not have been wandering around at night.
          Also, who do you know, when faced with an gunman demanding their valuables, doesn’t hand those things over, especially when those things aren’t worth much?
          That right there makes the “robbery gone wrong” theory not believable.
          Seth wasn’t a bad boy trying to hold on to his drug money.
          The lack of concern over what did happen, by people who should care, is a red flag.
          Remember when a nice young man working for Dr. Ben Carson’s campaign was killed in an accident? Remember the outpouring of emotion?
          THAT’S a normal reaction to a tragedy.

          Liked by 1 person

    • dizzymissl says:

      Another one is that Bill Still. He’s been proven wrong so many times and still his ridiculous videos get posted here. Drives me nuts.

      Liked by 7 people

      • BAMAFan says:

        Just listening to his hokey intro music drives me nuts.

        Liked by 2 people

      • K2P2 Ribbing says:

        And another one is that tweeting fool Jack Poseibic! VERY little (if anything) of what he breathlessly–and authoritatively–predicts actually comes to pass.

        And yet, people still post his tweets here left and right as if he’s spoutin’ the Gospel truth!

        SPIT!

        Like

    • WonkoTheSane says:

      Yeah, I hear you BamaFan. I was roasted for warning people not to hitch their wagon to Kimdotcom. The man is imho a criminal…indicted not yet convicted, and a publicity hoor.

      Liked by 1 person

    • rashamon says:

      My only question, BAMAFan, is why you would believe anything compiled by CNN? Especially on the structure of our port system and the surveillance (NOT) around the tonnage shipped in and out hourly — much of it the drugs used to pay for the CIA’s nefarious activities.

      As for Seth RIch, is Congress had spent 1/10 of the money pursuing “The Russian Collusion” on investigating the death of Mr. RIch, who had immediate contact with and responsibility for the DNC data and election organization, we might know something more about the multiple deaths beyond Mr. RIch and the manipulations of elections at the hands of the Democrats, which has been a notorious problem since JFK was elected.

      The RINO-led Congress shares much of the blame for the whack-a-mole tyranny that has become our government.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Wiggyky says:

      I’m curious about the sudden disappearance of Kim Dotcom. He was all over the news for a few days then suddenly after the cancellation on Hannity and his being forced to shut up all has been quiet. Or did I miss something?

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Dora says:

    Obama-Era FCC Caught Red-Handed Giving Preferential Treatment To Liberal Groups

    A high-level employee at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 2014 appeared to give leaders of liberal-leaning groups preferential treatment for posting and publicizing comments on the agency’s public forum for the net neutrality debate.

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/18/obama-era-fcc-caught-red-handed-giving-preferential-treatment-to-liberal-groups/

    Liked by 7 people

  9. daughnworks247 says:

    Rumpole, Rumpole where are you????
    We need a new Muh Russia countdown meme, pretty please.

    Liked by 1 person

    • H.R. says:

      IIRC, rumpole said he’d be headed out to sea on his catamaran (it’s a beaut!) and couldn’t post while at sea. It wasn’t clear to me how long he expected to be out of port.

      Liked by 2 people

  10. Martin says:

    Liked by 19 people

    • RunningOnEmpty says:

      Republicans could pass all of those things without a single Dem vote. Why don’t they? (rhetorical question since we all know the answer)

      Liked by 10 people

    • georgiafl says:

      32,551,672 followers @realDonaldTrump – increasing around a million per 7-10 days.

      Liked by 23 people

      • thluckyone says:

        LOL! ROTFL! So, georgiafl, you’re maybe sayin’ “Who NEEDS CNN/MSNBC/CBS/NBC/ABC/ESPEEN WaPo/Slop-o/NYT?” THE LION has his own ‘news agency’ (twitter account) and he will TELL you de-facts-o-de matter!

        HEY! EVERYONE INSIST THAT YOUR CABLE PROVIDER INCLUDE OUR LION’S TWITTER ACCOUNT IN YOUR CHANNEL PACKAGE OR YOU WILL CUT THE CORD IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY!

        Oh, Georgiafl, oh Treepers! You got me feelin’ GOOD this mornin’! THANKS, Everybody!

        Liked by 9 people

        • georgiafl says:

          President Trump’s Total media following hit 100 MILLION way back in March. I haven’t kept track because my adding machine died and I like a print-out to catch errors.

          I’m sure it’s probably around 110-115 Million by now. There are duplicates, global followers and of course enemies, but that’s still a lot of outreach power.

          Please keep on Tweeting, Mr. President!

          We count on you for bald-faced, brazen, unfiltered, fearless TRUTH.

          Liked by 10 people

    • Ron says:

      President Trump ain’t got time for these a**holes, he’s packing multiple, ground shaking ideas into a single tweet now.

      1. Slams the democrats
      2. Promotes Tax Cuts
      3. Promotes good healthcare
      4. Promotes border security
      5. Blames Obamacare on them
      6. Proclaims he has defeated Obamacare
      7. Slams Obamacare increases in premiums
      8. Endorses Karen Handel

      Libs BTFO before 8:30a.m. by the leader of the Free World, the God-Emperor is at full power this morning.

      Liked by 14 people

      • IndiaMaria says:

        1000 LIKES.

        Liked by 2 people

      • thluckyone says:

        RON! So THIS is what happens when our Lion gets a weekend away for some REAL refreshment with family? Good GRIEF! LOL! The man is already a Twenty-Locomotive MONSTER-hauler even when he’s TIRED! ROTL! It’s HARD to stop a Trump-Train! THANKS, RON!

        Liked by 6 people

      • Bendix says:

        Obamacare can’t be slammed enough. Poisonous people are trying to lay blame for the baseball shootings on the victims, because of health care.
        They’ve been pushing the idea that Trump is going to take away something that is falling apart and has to be replaced. Even Hillary said she needed to fix it.
        Yet I still hear people saying Republicans are taking something away.

        Like

  11. A2 says:

    Samoa has officially become a Christian state following amendments to the constitution in early June.

    https://www.premier.org.uk/News/World/Samoa-officially-becomes-a-Christian-state

    Liked by 13 people

  12. Martin says:

    Dang….. Hannity was kicking some arse last night on twitter:

    Liked by 19 people

  13. MaryLS says:

    Anyone else put off by the US bombing the Syrian plane in support of the rebels? This is one area where I am not happy with Trump’s decisions (if he is making them personally). He had promised no more “regime change”. They should back off of interference in Syria. It is a no win situation for the US. It also is moving towards a very dangerous situation as Russia is threatening to shoot down anything. We have nothing to gain in Syria.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Chuck says:

      You may want to do a little more research into that story. It has really been twisted around.

      Liked by 3 people

    • IndiaMaria says:

      Silly. Russia rhetoric is empty. They are working WITH Trump.

      We have ENORMOUS interests in stopping Assad from killing MODERATE opposition under the guise of “fighting” ISIS, as he has been doing. Trump has LEAD the ARAB FREEDOM ALLIANCE with Egypt, Jorgan, Saudi Arabia and 53 other Muslim countries. Opposing Assad is opposing IRAN, EVERYONE’s enemy. MAGA requires Peace, and Peace is coming with a quickness to the Mid East. And so is BILLIONS of dollars in Arab investment in AMERICAN jobs.

      Liked by 2 people

      • rashamon says:

        And exactly who are you going to install to run Syria when Assad is run off? No one is going to solve the tribal disruptions that have made the ME unstable since oil was discovered (with special thanks to the Brits and the French for trying to colonize everything that moves, breathes or can be traded for gold, not to mention the US for becoming everything the Founders determined they hated about being under British rule).

        Assad was elected because he brought stability to a territory established by a straight edge and a pen without any consideration of the peoples who actually lived there. Erdogen wants a Caliphate; Obama wanted to encourage that pathway by letting in the Muslim Brotherhood, long considered a terrorist group by other leaders of the ME. The issue is more around oil and gas and access to seaports than it is about human rights. Russia has some justification of working out the problems as the stray terrorists wander into its satellite to disrupt the Orthodox Christians’ and other religions’ political freedoms. They would also like to continue providing gas to Europe.

        Trump and Putin probably have a game plan, but meanwhile Congress led by McCain and Miss Lindsay is beating war drums to disrupt the projects that should be on their agenda — such as healthcare and tax reform.

        Liked by 2 people

    • RC says:

      ISIS NO MORE — — GOOD NEWS ? — — YOU DECIDE

      CBC Canada reports that al-Nusra, an ISIS al-Qaeda affiliate, has been renamed and taken off the US State Department terror watch list — even though its leader still carries a bounty of $10 million on his head.

      Confused? Well, back in 2012 self-styled ISIS Caliph, Abu al Baghdadi, began recruiting Sunni jihadi to “liberate” Syria from a terrible non-Sunni dictator, who protected Christians. One year later, in 2013, al-Baghdadi’s Syrian organization, called al-Nusra, declared independence. Enter al Qaeda Central’s Ayman al Zawahiri who attempted to mediate, but to little effect as Gulf States, al Nusra’s anti-Shia foreign backers, saw no reason drop their support.

      Since then, that terrible Syrian dictator handily won the Presidency of Syria (in Internationally monitored elections), the Syrian Army was trained by the Chinese in anti-insurgency tactics and Syria gained air and ground military support from Russia, resulting in major defeat of Turkish, Jordanian, Gulf State, British and US jihadi proxies.

      Such defeats in the field and consequent loss of personnel through death / desertion has forced the sponsoring states to re-organize and amalgamate their dwindling supply of terrorists. Since the US State Department found it embarrassing to remove al Nusra from the terror watch list, the miserable jihadi were given a new name, new respectability and newly made US jeeps, missiles etc as Hayat Tahrir al Sham. Since these don’t really want to fight the Chinese trained Syrian Army, the US now openly bombs their opponents when 30 miles away.

      Alas for Canada, CBC reports that al Nusra terrorists currently facing trial in Canada are presenting their newly acquired US legitimacy as a defense. So, what are the Canadian courts to do?

      Perhaps we should send our Supreme Court Chief Justice to sort out when a terrorist is not a terrorist — a much simpler task than explaining how an un-constitutional Obamacare FINE is really a constitutional TAX. If we sweeten the deal with an early retirement package, perhaps he might stay in Canada.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. David says:

    PROSECUTORS WHO WILL BECOME HERO’S TO THE UNITED STATEDS
    Each Prosecutors has an Opportunity to become a HERO throughout History and Around the World; by being Successful in Prosecuting: Hillary’s Emails, Clinton Foundation, Unmasking, Leaks ETC.

    HERO’S by bringing back the “Rule of Law” the foundation of the United States and the entire Planet. These Prosecutors would save “America” from Continued; Treason/Sedition/Espionage/Subversion/Perjury/Corruption by taking down the Biggest Criminal Organization in the World of all time and Saving President’s Trump’s “Making America Great Again” and ensuring it never gets reversed. These Prosecutor HERO’S will have stopped the destruction of the Constitution and the United States.

    Why wouldn’t a True Prosecutor Want This Extraordinary Opportunity?

    Liked by 6 people

  15. I just sent his email to Patagonia through their contact form on their website: https://www.patagonia.com/contact/ Oh, here is reason why: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/18/outdoor-clothing-giant-patagonia-pledging-lead-resistance-trump/

    I am a hiker in the mountains of NC and I purchase my hiking shoes and clothing at outdoor stores such as REI, etc. I recently read that your company CEO is vowing to resist our President. To me, this is an open invitation to overturn the free and democratically elected President of the USA. I cannot support any company that would encourage this type of behavior, which borders on sedition. Therefore, I shall never purchase another article of clothing from your company and I will share my beliefs with others. You should be ashamed.

    Liked by 39 people

    • G. Combs says:

      I too am in NC and shop at REI.

      Liked by 2 people

    • CDuran says:

      Thank you for the link. I just left my 2 cents…
      “Once again you retailers think you can interject your “opinion” into your business model. I am an avid outdoors woman and a consumer. Take note that I will go out of my way not to buy anything supplied by your company. I too will “resist” the incessant chirping of companies and affiliates such as yours that want to change our republic. Clean your own shop. Shame on you.

      Liked by 19 people

    • RunnerMom in Idaho says:

      I also just sent them an email. I’m a hiker/runner/skier in Idaho.

      Liked by 7 people

    • Ron says:

      Just a suggestion, in my opinion, the people at Patagonia don’t care if a Trump supporter doesn’t buy their stuff. They’re too liberal to understand that’s bad for them.

      However! REI does. The real play here, is to get in touch with REI, and outdoors world or whoever sells their stuff, and tlel them you’re not shopping there because they support, by selling their product, a company like Patagonia who is anti-American and is resisting the democratically elected president. You didn’t realize REI supports socialism, so you’re not going to give them your capitalism.

      If REI drops Patagonia, Patagonia goes out of business.

      Liked by 13 people

    • mireilleg says:

      Left them my opinion too. Thanks for the link.

      Liked by 1 person

    • quintrillion says:

      I just e-mailed them too. I do not buy from them but get their catalogs mailed here because of son’s ex-girlfriend put down my address when she stayed here a while back.

      I let them know I only use their mailings to line my birds cage and I would never buy their foreign made, over-priced crap. I Love my President Trump.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Bendix says:

      The baseball team shootings are on her, then.
      Look at cowardly Hillary, stirring up murder and then hiding from the fallout.

      Like

  16. delmarvajim says:

    Looks like Baron Trump is making news all by himself. Good for him. The comments that follow this article are a hoot too

    http://thedailychronicle.co.uk/2017/06/18/breaking-barron-trump-wins-national-academic-awa

    Like

    • dizzymissl says:

      I’ve never seen this website before

      Liked by 1 person

    • MaineCoon says:

      We all knew Barron was a brain, but this article really show a side of him I’ve never ready about.Excerpt.

      “Barron, who has been working tirelessly at his prep school, made his Science Awards debut with a brand new project centered around the regulation of thermodynamics in shale rock in the upper peninsula of Lake Porter, Arkansas.

      Trump won the grand prize of the festivities: a check for $150,000 to continue his education in the field of Thermodynamics.

      “I’ve never seen a smarter kid,” president of the Science Awards Teddy Rusker said. “Really, his project was incredible. He might end up being the next great American scientist.”

      Like

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      Fake news.

      Liked by 1 person

    • IndiaMaria says:

      Oops! There goes the “Barron Autism”, “Something WRONG with Barron” narratives…heh, heh

      Like

    • There are no national generically named “Science Awards”, nobody gives $150k prizes to 11 year-olds, and the colleges mentioned don’t allow prep schoolers to apply. There’s also no Lake Porter, Arkansas, though there is a Porter Lake in a rural community named Lucas Township, population 837. There’s no shale rock there. The shale rock in Arkansas is around Fayetteville, opposite side of the state.

      If this was a real story and not an attempt at hyperbolic satire, don’t you think it would also be covered elsewhere?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Canadiangeorge says:

      It’s fake news. I googled the name Teddy Rusker and this was the only hit. You would assume more websites would have the name, but no.

      Like

    • daughnworks247 says:

      Fake news.

      Like

  17. youme says:

    This man thinks we are stupid fools.

    Every DOJ settlement is public information having been approved by federal courts judges

    Senate Judiciary Committee chair wants answers on where all the mortgage settlement money went
    Sen. Grassley asks DOJ to consider clawing back funds

    https://www.housingwire.com/articles/40448-senate-judiciary-committee-chair-wants-answers-on-where-all-the-mortgage-settlement-money-went

    Liked by 1 person

    • Grandma Covfefe says:

      This is what I love about this site–you all are gifted in sorting out what’s real and fake.

      That is the first line of political defense-true or false.
      Stay the course.
      God Bless you all today.

      Like

  18. dizzymissl says:

    LMAO. One down

    Liked by 2 people

  19. StormyeyesC says:

    http://www.redflagpapers.com/2017/06/18/special-report-ex-fbi-agent-decided-to-talk-about-what-is-actually-happening-in-the-fbi/

    IMPORTАNT: FBI Аgеnt ЕXPOSЕD Jаmеs Comеy Аnd Sеnt This Еxtrеmеly Comprоmising List To Thе Аmеrican Nаtion

    SPECIAL REPORT: Ex-FBI Agent decided to talk about what is actually happening in the FBI. Cesar Paz was a top rated federal agent with 22 years of experience. He shocked the nation today as he posted his video in which he has some certain questions of a HUGE IMPORTANCE that need to be answered.
    Cesar Paz started his speech in a very cynical and original way. If you remember, James Comey in his last testimony claimed that Loretta Lynch told him to not to call Hillary’s email serves case an INVESTIGATION, but to call it a matter.
    She intentionally ordered Comey to call it a matter and, probably, she also did everything in her power as an Attorney General to protect Hillary Clinton and her accomplices.
    “I’m a retired agent from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, not the the Federal Bureau of Matter, or Matters.”-started Paz.
    Then, he continued warning us about the huge REVELATIONS that he is going to share with us.
    DEAR READERS, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION! These are extremely important revelations and you have to consider the fact that the mainstream media will NEVER publish this story, so please make your commitment and SHARE this story everywhere!

    THIS IS THE OFFICIAL LIST OF SOME OF AGENT PAZ’S QUESTIONS FOR JAMES COMEY that he needs to answer as soon as possible.
    SHARE THIS LIST EVERYWHERE-THIS BRAVE MAN DESERVES ATTENTION!
    Isn’t it true that you were an assistant U.S. attorney for a prosecutor between 1996 and 2003?
    In your official capacity at the Department of Justice, did you investigate and did you clear Bill Clinton of any wrongdoing for extending a presidential pardon to Marc Rich, a fugitive from justice, a fugitive of the United States?
    Isn’t it true that between 2003 and 2005, you held a position with the office of the Attorney General?
    Isn’t it true that in 2005, you resigned from the Department of Justice and accepted a job as the senior vice-president with the office of general counsel at Lockheed Martin, a company that is a major, major military contractor?
    Isn’t it true that in 2010, when you were employed with Lockheed Martin, Lockheed won 17 approvals for private contracts with the Department of State while Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State?
    Isn’t it true that in 2010, while you were employed with Lockheed Martin, Lockheed became a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation and non-profit organizations?
    Isn’t it true that in late 2010, after Lockheed was awarded those contracts by the Hillary Clinton State Department, you stepped down from Lockheed and received a $6 million payout for your services?
    Isn’t it true that in 2013, the largest bank of England, HSBC, was being investigated by federal authorities for laundering billions of dollars for the Mexican drug cartels, channeling money to the Middle East, specifically Iran, which is in violation of the law?
    Isn’t it true that Robert Mueller, former director of the FBI and now the special counsel to investigate the alleged “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia… isn’t it true that Mr. Mueller was the chief counsel at HSBC… the same bank that was laundering money for the cartels?
    Isn’t it true that HSBC was a significant Clinton Foundation contributor? That Bill Clinton was being paid about $200,000 for his speeches at HSBC events… and this is while Mrs. Clinton was the Secretary of State? No conflict of interest there?
    Isn’t it true that HSBC was basically let off the hook with a $1.2 billion fine – which was paid by shareholders – and none of its officers, managers, directors were charged criminally or let go? Isn’t it true that while all hell was breaking loose at HSBC, YOU, Mr. Comey, were appointed as a director and member of the board at HSBC to assist with damage control?
    THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT-SHARE THIS QUESTIONS, EVERY AMERICAN DESERVES TO SEE THIS!
    Isn’t it true, Mr. Comey, that your salary went from $206,000 in 2002 when you were a government employee, to $33.5 million in 2012…. And that you earned these moneys while working for entities that were major contributors to the Clintons?
    Isn’t it true that you worked for Bridgewater Associates between 2010 and 2013, and that they are also a major contributor to the Clintons?
    Isn’t it true that you worked for Columbia University in 2013 as a senior research scholar at the school of law, and that Columbia University is also a major contributor to the Clintons?
    Isn’t it true that you gave this memo that you wrote on Bureau time on a classified computer in a Bureau car… and you gave this memo to Daniel Richman, your friend, a liberal professor (at Columbia), and he gave this memo to the New York Times?
    Mr. Comey, you were appointed FBI Director by former President Obama in 2013, as Secretary Clinton was leaving the State Department. Isn’t it true that you were appointed by Obama as FBI Director because you had proven yourself to be of service to the Clintons and their associates and entities that contribute millions of dollars to the Clintons’ non-profit organizations?
    Isn’t it true that you, as Director of the FBI in 2013 did absolutely nothing in regards to the missing $2 billion from the State Department finances, and this happened while Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State?
    Isn’t it true, that while you were Director of the FBI, for over two years, nothing happened as a result of the FBI “investigations” into the Clinton non-profit organizations?
    If it had not been for the emails that were leaked involving Mrs. Clinton and her associates, all this would be unknown to everyone. But these emails were leaked… and fortunately, the truth is coming out.
    Isn’t it true that Mrs. Clinton and other subjects of the investigation were never advised of their Miranda rights, which is used by FBI agents during interviews… this form was never executed.

    Agent Paz really made my day. Nobody expected something like this, but the time has come. We witness TERROR every day. We see that people kill people on American soil just because of political/ideological differences.
    We can not allow them to continue with this. This was agent Paz’s duty and our duty is to share this everywhere. The ignorance ends here, the liberal tyranny and fascism will be destroyed.
    JOHN 8:32 “THEN YOU WILL KNOW THE TRUTH, AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE”

    Liked by 7 people

  20. ALEX says:

    This video is hilarious for the short two minutes. It really shows the support for the President has been deeply wounded in just five months and he probably will never recover. Millions were suckers..

    Liked by 15 people

  21. HOW IMPEACHING President Trump WILL PLAY OUT for the GLOBALIST CABAL

    FTA (Kurt Schlichter): The establishment hacks think they can undermine the foundations of this country and not have it collapse on top of them.
    • What progressives forget is that the rules, norms, and customs they ignore are not there to protect the normals, but to protect the weak and vulnerable elites who can’t go to their gun safe and choose from a half-dozen long weapons when things get real. 
    • If you end the rule of law, you begin the rule of power, and the rule of power means the folks with the most guns rule. Do they think the predominantly red state soldiers of our military are going to murder other Americans and risk their own lives to secure the unearned power of a bunch of Chardonnay-swilling liberals and their fakecon lackeys?
    https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2017/06/19/if-the-left-wins-their-soft-coup-everyone-loses–but-mostly-them-n2342884

    … But there’s SO MUCH MORE …

    GLOBALIST CORPORATIONS will EVAPORATE:

    American Patriots who elected President Trump know EVERY Globalist Corporation that has donated to EITHER wing of the Demo-Rino Uniparty, and will ceaselessly wreak RETRIBUTION:
    Think Macy’s and Kellogg times 1000.
    • Globalists’ Patriot CUSTOMERS will massively BOYCOTT.
    • Globalists’ INTERNAL operations will be massively DISRUPTED.

    Globalists’ lean domestic and international SUPPLY CHAINS will be massively DISRUPTED:
    Think Syria times 1000, with zero inventory to buffer the disruptions.
    • Imports and Exports at both ports and customs will be DISRUPTED.
    • Trucking will be DISRUPTED.
    • Distribution Center operations will be DISRUPTED.
    • Rail and highway movements will be DISRUPTED.
    • Electric Utility transmissions will be DISRUPTED.
    • Pipeline flows will be DISRUPTED.
    • All of the above will be HACKED.
    • Law Enforcement loyal to President Trump will NOT be there to protect Globalist operations.

    Globalists’ assets will be CONFISCATED:
    Think Venezuela times 1000, with zero capacity to stop it.
    • Tech Companies’ intellectual property will be appropriated in country after country.
    • Patent protections will become meaningless across international borders.
    • Countries will nationalize assets and operations and subsidiaries, ranging from oil and gas, to consumer and industrial products, to high technology.
    • All of the above will be HACKED.
    • The American Military – overwhelming loyal to President Trump – will resign en masse, rather than protect or recover the overseas assets confiscated from Globalist Corporate Cabal.

    Globalists’ stock value will PLUMMET … virtually OVERNIGHT:
    Think Lehman times 1000.

    … SO WHY WOULD CONGRESS PAINT TARGETS on both THEIR OWN BACKS and the BACKS of ALL WHO ASSOCIATE WITH THEM?

    After seeing the attempted mass assassination of their peers by an unprovoked Bernie supporter, what in their wildest imagination would make them think that ATTEMPTING an IMPEACHMENT COUP against the TRUMP ADMINISTRATION would secure their safety:
    Think TURKEY times 1000.

    Liked by 6 people

    • G. Combs says:

      YES!!! And that is what we have to call up and communicate to our Congress Critters.

      If you continue to DESTROY the Rule of Law then you return us to the Rule of the Jungle. If you think Christians (and we agnostics that respect Christian values) are going to just sit by and ‘turn the other cheek’ while you destroy our Republic after we have watched you destroy Europe, you have another thing coming.

      Matthew 21:12-13
      And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but you have made it a den of thieves.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Howie says:

      Duck and Cover.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ray Titus says:

      Sadly, this is erroneous thinking. I wish it were true that because the right has a lot of armed citizens that they would prevail. I wish it were true that the military would not turn against the citizens. But the facts don’t match the theory. Yes, many American own guns,but unlike during the American Revolution when citizens weapons were very similar to what the military had, today the military has far more advanced weapons than the public. They can do things you can’t even dream of. And the idea that the military wouldn’t turn against citizens defies world history. Over and over and over again we’ve seen military personnel throughout the world turn against their own people. Even in America we’ve seen police turn against our people. A large percentage of our military, especially the rank and file members, were Hillary voters. Don’t think for a second that many of them would stand up against orders and turn against civilians. Obama was clearly ineligible yet how many challenged orders he gave, which is their constitutional duty to do when there’s a question of the commander’s legitimacy? I only remember one and that was Lt. Col.Terry Lakin who lost his career and went to prison for asking a question. And the enlisted personnel would be far less apt to challenge an order.

      If all that isn’t enough, if the government thought they were about to lose in a conflict with the citizens you can bet they’d make a deal with other governments to bring in troops the help them. You’d see Chinese, Russian, Cuban, and all sorts of other military powers helping them clamp down on the citizens.

      This argument being expressed is a typical argument of those who think the citizens can win just because many have guns. If it comes down to that I would not be so sure it would be winnable. I think this has to be won peacefully through the political process because if it becomes a military process there is little chance the citizens could win.

      This is why this entire mess is the citizen’s fault. We should have voted these people out long ago. How we have an uphill battle that will take more than just a few years to win.

      Liked by 2 people

      • 4sure says:

        Yes. I and all of my friends own many weapons and know how to use them. But the overwhelming majority of them are only politically concerned about one thing…the 2nd amendment. Believe it or not some are liberal dimms who always vote for the dimms. Most of all of them, dimma and pub., would not use those firearms to save the republic.

        And the new military is not your father’s military or even the one we may have been a member of in in the 1960’s. There are many many liberals in today’s military at all ranks. Especially the upper ranks and in our police depts, esp. the large dimm controlled cities.

        Forget about saving this country through armed citizens while times are good. It is not going to happen unless people became so impoverished and were dying by the thousands or we were in a deep, deep economic depression with no hope for a better future.

        Even then the powerful would still control all of the military arsenal and personnel. And the globalists would not hesitate to unleash pure hell on us to quell any uprising. Remember, they don’t need to have any mfg. facilities in this country or even sell anything in America to sustain their business. It is a global business. W/O american consumers, they could still survive. Maybe not at the lofty profit levels, but they would still be making money. And the more immigrants they can bring in to dilute the pop. the more they can count on no resistance because the immigrants will owe no allegiance to the American way or the constitution. Flood the country with illegals who never intend to assimilate and you do away with patriotism. That’s the plan.And it’s working, so far.

        Liked by 2 people

      • M. Mueller says:

        I’m waiting for our President to remove the weapons and billions of bullets we’ve heard are stockpiled by the IRS, etc.

        If that whole deal was true, they should be removed and put in the hands of the military. I don’t like the thought of various government agencies being well armed.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Ray Titus, either you’re a progressive Troll or you’re absurdly ignorant of our military, their ethics and their commitment to government OF, BY and FOR the PEOPLE.

        … Not to mention foolish enough to think DISRUPTION requires armed action.
        Think Occupy times 1000.

        Like

      • I will admit to harboring some of the same fears, specifically the high tech weapons that would be trained against The People and the influx of foreign military, who are already here, ostensibly for “training.” However, as for the rank and file in the military, they overwhelmingly vote GOP as well as the vast majority of us veterans out here. I do worry about the PD upper echelon in the big cities but, out here in flyover country, we have more Constitutional sheriffs who will NOT go along with a war against the citizens.

        Like

    • thluckyone says:

      BKR, thank you for putting it into perspective. You help me to grasp things that my mind can’t quite get hold of. Those working against our President are seeking a goal that has no meaning to me. I can’t understand not wanting BILLIONS of peaceful people to prosper and rejoice together. That peace & rejoicing appears to me to be our President’s intention.

      I can imagine our military involved in something like a coup on behalf of our President. DOZENS of members of congress, the judiciary & the media arrested and held incognito. I sincerely believe President Trump is trying to avoid that. We see our President’s tweets. However, I wonder if he doesn’t already have HUNDREDS of “private channels” opened with local LEO’s and military commanders.

      I believe our Lion’s appreciation of our military is deep and sincere. And I think our military TOTALLY reciprocates that appreciation. NOBODY has enough money to buy that! You buy loyalty with loyalty – there IS no other currency for that purchase. Shucks, I’ve never even been military and I would follow President Trump into hell.

      Rule of power? Oh, s**t! The brutes ain’t never IMAGINED brutality like what’s waiting… just waiting… Let me just continue to pray that black gate is never opened any wider than it is already. I wouldn’t really enjoy watching the brutes get what they deserve (YES I WOULD!!)

      “Father, God! HEAL our land! Have mercy on us! NO, we don’t deserve it but we plead for mercy. Let the tares grow with the wheat – for now. Teach us to DO justice and to LOVE mercy and to walk humbly. Lord, heal our land!”

      Liked by 3 people

  22. missmarple2 says:

    https://amgreatness.com/2017/06/19/trumps-way-progressive-labyrinth/

    Victor Davis Hanson gives a good analysis of the situation and the way for the President to succeed.

    I particularly like the idea of Madonna on the “no fly” list.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Exactly what the neocons were hoping would happen.
    They want a proxy war with Russia and they don’t intend to let a little thing like the election of a new president stop them.
    They don’t mind where it is, The Ukraine, Georgia, Syria, it really makes no difference as long as it keeps funding the military–industrial complex.

    Russia Halts Cooperation With US In Syria, Will “Intercept Any Aircraft” In Russian Areas Of Operation
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-19/russia-halts-cooperation-us-syria-will-intercept-any-aircraft-russian-areas-operatio

    Liked by 1 person

  24. NJF says:

    Amazing.

    David Eubank runs through gunfire in Mosul to save a child | Daily Mail Online

    ‘I thought, “If I die doing this, my wife and kids would understand”,’ Eubank told the Los Angeles Times.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4614460/David-Eubank-runs-gunfire-Mosul-save-child.html

    Liked by 3 people

  25. wyntre says:

    Liked by 19 people

  26. Just Mind Boggling!

    “A data analytics contractor employed by the Republican National Committee (RNC) left databases containing information on nearly 200 million potential voters exposed to the internet without security, allowing anyone who knew where to look to download it without a password.

    “We take full responsibility for this situation,” said the contractor, Deep Root Analytics, in a statement.

    The databases were part of 25 terabytes of files contained in an Amazon cloud account that could be browsed without logging in. The leaky account was discovered by researcher Chris Vickery of the security firm UpGuard. The files have since been secured.”

    http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/338383-data-on-198-million-us-voters-left-exposed-to-the-internet-by-rnc-data

    Like

  27. rebel53blog says:

    Mosqueplace Violence in Londonistan, like the Khan says, ‘The price of living in a big city’

    Liked by 2 people

  28. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Western Europe in done.

    Germany: Police Powerless Against Middle Eastern Crime Gangs
    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10543/germany-crime-gangs

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      It’s even worse than I realized. Ransacking the police stations with. O consequences? Germany is finished.

      Liked by 2 people

      • The Boss says:

        Will check some sources there to verify.
        Might take some time though.
        They’re reluctant to email non-PC info.
        Some Germans are waking up.
        But still, too many hit snooze and sleep in.

        Like

      • Evelyn says:

        I will bless them that bless you, and curse them that curse you, and in you shall all families of the earth be blessed.

        Germany, indeed most of Europe, was not particularly hospitable to the first descendants of Abraham that God sent them. God has decided to send a different group of Abraham’s descendants instead.

        True and just are His judgments.

        Like

        • BakoCarl says:

          The angel of the LORD said to Hagar ” . . . you will give birth to a son. You shall name him Ishmael, for the LORD has heard of your misery. He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone and everyone’s hand against him, and he will live in hostility toward all his brothers.”

          Like

        • thluckyone says:

          Evelyn, we are in agreement regarding the justice of God’s judgements. But PLEASE don’t be misled by the false “3rd Abrahamic Faith” narrative. Yes, I know you’ve been hearing it for decades but NONE of the descendants of Father Abraham are in any way related to modern-day Islam or Muslims. ALL OF US need to learn this and share this!

          There is NO connection – whatever – between the idolatry of Islam and the faith of Abraham in the Only Living God. The narrative that says “Muslims are connected with the descendants of Ishmael” is a hoax for which I fell for many years. It is a lie – invented by Islamic apologists to try to give some credibility to their hateful, racist, misogynist Mohammedan-fascism. Islam must die and the precious Muslim people MUST BE set free from it. The faith of Father Abraham will live forever.

          We are ALL learning here and THANK YOU, Evelyn, for being here among us!

          Like

          • K2P2 Ribbing says:

            Whatever! You don’t even provide any evidence; you just shake your finger in people’s face and tell them, “Don’t say that!” because YOU don’t believe it’s true.

            NEWS FLASH: It’s YOUR OPINION!

            Liked by 1 person

            • thluckyone says:

              K2P2, you are correct. It IS my opinion. However, it is not just MY opinion. Please let me point you to a wonderful resource – one of many – but one of the most accessible resources you might find. However, I warn you that – even as accessible as is this resource – it is not an easy read. OTOH, it IS reliable and the authors have no reason to try to confuse you.

              http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/ishmael.htm

              From the article linked above:
              Quote:
              “Writer Camilla Adang, in a footnote from her book, Muslim Writers on Judaism and the Hebrew Bible from Ibn Rabban to Ibn Hazm, mentions:

              … Ishmael is considered the progenitor of the Arabs. Dagon (1981)
              has shown that this idea is an Islamic construction AND THAT NO CONNECTION
              BETWEEN ISHMAEL AND THE ARABS HAD EVER BEEN MADE IN THE PRE-ISLAMIC PERIOD
              . Already in the first Islamic century, however, Ishmael came to symbolize the
              Islamic Umma, and biblical passages about Ishmael were taken to refer to
              Muhammad, the Arabs, or the Muslim community.
              (Adang, p. 147, fn. 37: E.J. Brill Academic Publishers; August 1997
              ISBN: 9004100342; bold and capital emphasis ours)”
              End Quote

              And the whole article as linked above is WELL worth serious study.

              It has been one of the most heartbreaking realizations of my life to learn that the precious Muslim people have been so badly deceived – and in turn are themselves become deceivers. Muslims are hostages and slaves. Many Muslim people CAN be rescued however, while Islam must die. Islam is idolatry and is already under judgement. Not my call. The Christ of Almighty God is the judge and Islam has no connection with God, whatever. Islam is doomed in that it has never had any connection with Father Abraham or with the Divine..

              THANKS, K2P2!

              Like

  29. NJF says:

    Liked by 16 people

    • Katherine McCoun says:

      BOLD. Fight this political battle and take it to ’em! Say the obvious that everyone else is thinking but has been afraid to say. So glad more and more conservatives are speaking up. Maybe they see that this is a political battle that we actually can win with President Trump leading the charge!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Howie says:

      He did not like dodging democrat bullets.

      Liked by 3 people

  30. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  31. Tech Titans about to meet with President Trump at the White House:

    Time to start ESCALATING America’s CYBER SECURITY?]
    OR
    Time to REVEAL the complicity of Tech Titans in Obama’s Spying on Citizens?

    Time to start fingering the RADICALIZERS and RADICALIZED?
    OR
    Time to BREAK UP the Oligopolies that protect the RADICALIZERS and RADICALIZED?

    Time to start HARDENING America’s TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE?
    OR
    Time to start CHARGING Tech Titans who DON’T for an INFRASTRUCTURE RECOVERY FUND?

    Liked by 7 people

  32. JohnP says:

    To all the Treepers who have remembered by daughter in their prayers, a big thank you.

    We got the results of her bone marrow test today and her Hodgkins has NOT spread to her bones.

    Liked by 42 people

  33. Scotty19541 says:

    Looks like a car bomb at Champs-Elysees in Paris. No details yet….

    Like

    • Scotty19541 says:

      UPDATE: Paris authorities say a suspected attacker has been “downed” after driving into a police car on the Champs-Elysees – SKY

      Like

  34. stillers213 says:

    Did anyone else see right through Comey’s pathetic testimony? Note how the poor weakling former FBI Director played victim in order to garner public sympathy and obtain witness status with thoughts of getting immunity. It was his best remaining move since he knows the Trump administration has the goods on him after his unexpected firing while 3000 miles away. Trump’s bread crumbs are set and Mueller’s investigation will lead exactly where it is supposed to lead – right back to the former administration handling of the Hillary case, the leaking, and the unmasking.
    Like most of you, I was extremely surprised to see him randomly throw Lynch under this bus. Comey knows this investigation will lead back to the former admin and Hillary, so he was setting himself up for witness status in that potential future investigation as well. I’m probably in the minority, but I believe that Mueller will bring forth the truth.

    Liked by 5 people

  35. Moderators, there is something on this page – possibly an advertisement, that is always forcing it to the top of the page even as I type a comment. I can also no longer read most posts or articles due to these.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. The Red Skins get to keep their trademark.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Sherlock says:

      Good case, 8-0. Government suppressing speech using the trademark law a no-no.
      From Justice Alito, in striking down the law: “It is not an anti-discrimination clause; it is a happy-talk clause. In this way, it goes much further than is necessary to serve the interest asserted.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • RunningOnEmpty says:

      Alito also cautioned in his opinion that the government still “has an interest in preventing speech expressing ideas that offend.” If that is an accurate quote it is disturbing coming from a conservative justice.

      Like

      • G. Combs says:

        “[…]the government still “has an interest in preventing speech expressing ideas that offend.”
        GEEEEeee, do you mean like showing the decapitated head of our President, the brutal stabbing of our President, the former AG calling for marches, deaths and blood in the streets???

        NAHHhhh he only means Ag Lynch’s Over 1,000 Investigations Into Acts of Anti-Muslim Hatred, Including Rhetoric’ Hatred, assault and attacks on Christians and Conservatives don’t count in Obummer’s NEW USSSA (United Soviet Socialist States of America)

        Like

    • lisabrqwc says:

      Good thing — I would hate to think I’d have to cover up the prized possession hanging on my foyer wall 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

  37. Howie says:

    Hope we do not get in to a war with Russia over Syria.

    Liked by 2 people

  38. SCOTUS NEWS..
    Justices take on fight over partisan electoral maps

    The Supreme Court is wading into the thicket of partisan redistricting in a case from Wisconsin.
    The justices on Monday said they will decide whether Republican lawmakers drew electoral districts so out of whack with the state’s political breakdown that they violated the constitutional rights of Democratic voters.

    It’s the high court’s first case on what’s known as partisan gerrymandering in more than a decade, and the outcome could affect elections across the country.
    Democrats hope a favorable decision will help them cut into GOP electoral majorities. Election law experts say the case is the best chance yet for the high court to put limits on what lawmakers may do to gain a partisan advantage in creating political district maps.
    The case will be argued in the fall.

    A three-judge court struck down Wisconsin’s legislative districts in November and ordered new maps drawn in time for the 2018 elections. That work is proceeding.
    The Constitution requires states to redo their political maps to reflect population changes identified in the once-a-decade census. The issue of gerrymandering — creating districts that often are oddly shaped and with the aim of benefiting one party — is centuries old. The term comes from a Massachusetts state Senate district that resembled a salamander and was approved in 1812 by Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry.

    Both parties have sought the largest partisan edge when they control redistricting. Yet Democrats are more supportive of having courts rein in extreme districting plans, mainly because Republicans control more legislatures and drew districts after the 2010 census that enhanced their advantage in those states and in the House of Representatives.

    The challengers to the Wisconsin districts said it is an extreme example of redistricting that has led to ever-increasing polarization in American politics because so few districts are genuinely competitive between the parties. In these safe seats, incumbents tend to be more concerned about primary challengers, so they try to appeal mostly to their party’s base.

    “Partisan gerrymandering of this kind is worse now than at any time in recent memory,” said Paul Smith, who is representing the challengers to the GOP plan in Wisconsin.

    Defenders of the Wisconsin plan have argued that the election results it produced are similar to those under earlier court-drawn maps. They said the federal court overstepped its bounds and judges should stay out of an inherently political exercise.

    The justices should correct the lower court’s “flawed analysis before it spreads to other jurisdictions and interferes with the states’ fundamental political responsibilities,” Texas Solicitor General Scott Keller wrote for 12 Republican-dominated states that are backing Wisconsin.

    More at Link–> http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/justices-take-on-fight-over-partisan-electoral-maps/ar-BBCRL7H?ocid=iehp

    Liked by 2 people

    • redlegleader68 says:

      So, the question now comes into play: Will the court continue to allow for “historically black/hispanic/etc.” districts to be intentionally drawn or not? Just askin’ …

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sherlock says:

        They probably will as long as Kennedy is there. Can’t wait for him to leave. (Needless to say, the 4 leftists will automatically vote to maintain such racial districts).

        Liked by 1 person

    • wheatietoo says:

      The Democrats invented Gerrymandering.

      For decades and decades, the Dems have been doing exactly what they are suing the Republicans for doing.

      Republicans should argue that “We thought that this was a normal and usual practice, since the Democrats have been doing it, unchallenged, for the last hundred years.”

      It’s only because the Dems have lost power in so many states…and the Republicans are doing what they did for so long…that the Dems are now saying “You can’t do that!”

      Liked by 3 people

  39. NJF says:

    An argument I’m constantly making.

    Liked by 15 people

    • Katherine McCoun says:

      As I am teaching my son history I am making sure he has the perspective that the US citizens did not invent slavery and it was already here when we became a nation as well s the following.

      Europeans did not bring slavery to the shores of North America as various American Indians groups already practiced slavery. Europeans were not responsible for most of the capture and original sale of slaves coming out of Africa. Africans were involved in the slave trade against other Africans. Slavery in Africa began before Europeans came to Africa. North Africans and ME practiced slavery against the rest of Africa (and Europe!) before Europe adopted the practice. Slavery has been with human culture for 1000s of years. Europeans have lead the way in advancing civilization passed slavery. Just as many white Americans died to free the slaves as died defending slavery. Many (not all) “defending slavery” were actually defending their state and homes against invasion for a cause the didn’t uphold or practice (non slave holders, many of whom didn’t even approve of slavery!) and on the principle of states rights. America outlawed slavery before many other African and ME countries.

      America is today on the forefront of anti slavery laws and freeing those held in human bondage around around the world.

      Almost all countries and cultures have practices, events and even atrocities in their past. At what point decedents free of responsibility of ancestors crimes? What of those who are decedents of mixed ancestry? Where does their responsibility fall? What of those of African decent in America whose ancestors were both slaves and slave sellers back in Africa?

      “Where did the supply of slaves come from? First, the Portuguese themselves kidnapped some Africans. But the bulk of the supply came from the Nigerians. These Nigerian middlemen moved to the interior where they captured other Nigerians who belonged to other communities. The middlemen also purchased many of the slaves from the people in the interior . . . . Many Nigerian middlemen began to depend totally on the slave trade and neglected every other business and occupation. The result was that when the trade was abolished [by England in 1807] these Nigerians began to protest. As years went by and the trade collapsed such Nigerians lost their sources of income and became impoverished.”
      4 – See more at: http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/41431#sthash.yB4omkKb.dpuf

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/18/africans-apologise-slave-trade
      http://articles.latimes.com/2013/oct/17/world/la-fg-wn-slavery-africa-20131017
      http://discoveringbristol.org.uk/slavery/routes/places-involved/africa/slave-trade/

      Liked by 4 people

  40. Howie says:

    Recon Report from way put on the left flank..
    …It was just up on FOX Gorlick is recusing from repping Kushner due to her relationship with Muelley from Wilmer Hale firm….for what it is worth.

    Like

    • JohnP says:

      Gee, you mean she’s doing what Comey should have done during the investigation of Clinton emails?

      Like

    • Sherlock says:

      It will be Kushner’s call, not hers. It is an apparent conflict, which means it is waivable by the client. The situation does not fall into the category of non-waivable conflicts which require the lawyer to cease representation.

      Now, she may want out–there have been reports for months that she is under attack from the left for representing Kushner and others. Reports I saw today simply said she advised Kushner to consult with another attorney to decide whether he might wish different, or additional, information, and that she made this recommendation immediately upon Mueller being appointed special counsel. That sounds more likely than her backing off unilaterally.

      Like

  41. georgiafl says:

    Public Enemy # 1 – Islam

    Liked by 8 people

  42. Watcher says:

    Where is the mega database that zero built on us.
    Wacky maxi told us about it….Stay woke!

    Liked by 4 people

  43. daughnworks247 says:

    More evidence that MSM is dying.
    4Chan’s /pol/ now has something like 7-8 times the monthly page views over MSNBC (which had the most).
    At 6:00am this morning, I “tried” to tell my college age son about the most recent London attack. He was out of the shower and still getting dressed.
    He already KNEW all about it – via 4Chan.
    He immediately pulled up an interview by a guy in the next apartment building, who had live feed video, and was documenting the injuries, #killed, and so on.
    He pulled up the interview and handed me his phone.
    More accurate than anything on MSM.
    Amazing.

    Liked by 9 people

  44. http://www.zdnet.com/article/security-lapse-exposes-198-million-united-states-voter-records/

    A huge trove of voter data, including personal information and voter profiling data on what’s thought to be every registered US voter dating back more than a decade, has been found on an exposed and unsecured server, ZDNet has learned.
    It’s believed to be the largest ever known exposure of voter information to date.

    The various databases containing 198 million records on American voters from all political parties were found stored on an open Amazon S3 storage server owned by a Republican data analytics firm, Deep Root Analytics.
    Deep Root, which claims to be the “most experienced group of targeters in Republican politics,” uses that wealth of data to help its political clients make better decisions when buying television advertising air-time.

    That, the hope is, allows prospective Republican candidates and their committees to target pro-trade Republicans who might vote blue, and Democrats who want tighter immigration controls who can be convinced to vote red.

    Alex Lundry, co-founder of Deep Root, confirmed the company owned the Amazon S3 storage server, and said in an email that company has taken “full responsibility for this situation.”
    “Deep Root Analytics has become aware that a number of files within our online storage system were accessed without our knowledge,” said Lundry.
    “The data that was accessed was, to the best of our knowledge proprietary information as well as voter data that is publicly available and readily provided by state government offices. Since this event has come to our attention, we have updated the access settings and put protocols in place to prevent further access.”

    We accept full responsibility, will continue with our investigation, and based on the information we have gathered thus far, we do not believe that our systems have been hacked,” he said.

    This isn’t the first batch of voter data found by Vickery.

    Vickery, who we profiled on ZDNet earlier this year, found 87 million Mexican voter records in an exposed database in 2016.

    He was also responsible for discovering several US voter databases online totaling 18 million voters, and the state of Louisiana’s entire database of 2.9 million voters.

    Deep Root’s exposure also appears to be larger than the 191 million voter records exposed by i360, a data company, in late 2015, and another massive leak of 154 million voter records a year later.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. Martin says:

    Liked by 4 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s