Another Attack in London – Rented Vehicle Plows Into Pedestrians, Finsbury Park…

Another possible terrorist attack in North London as a large rented van has intentionally driven into a crowd of people in Finsbury Park, London on Seven Sisters road. The incident happened in front of a very well known mosque (Finsbury Park Mosque) where extremist cleric Abu Hamza was expelled earlier.

Multiple extremist clerics are identified with the Finsbury Park Mosque. The incident took place around midnight local time.

Initial reports of multiple people hit by the vehicle.  The Daily Mail reports: Several people were reportedly hurt after the van ploughed into a crowd on Seven Sisters Road near Finsbury Park Mosque. Eyewitnesses reported seeing bystanders wrestle the suspect to the floor and pin him down until officers arrived.

Twitter users claimed the victims were Muslims leaving late-night prayers being observed for the month of Ramadan.

A Metropolitan Police helicopter was seen circling overhead as photographs posted on social media showed a huge response from the emergency services. Dozens of police cars and vans cordoned off a large area of the normally bustling thoroughfare as stunned locals gathered at the scene.

More images on Twitter appeared to show a clean-shaven white man with black hair being detained by police officers behind a van, surrounded by a group of shouting onlookers. The incident follows two terrorist attacks in a matter of weeks at Westminster and London Bridge. (continue reading)

Here’s a picture of the van:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Cultural Marxism, Death Threats, European Union, Islam, Jihad, media bias, Police action, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

360 Responses to Another Attack in London – Rented Vehicle Plows Into Pedestrians, Finsbury Park…

  1. FanGirl says:

    I find it hinky nobody has good photos of the perp – they held him for police, why no pictures?

    Liked by 3 people

  2. Donna in Oregon says:

    Sixteen plus years of attacks by Muslims all over the world, Hey, government hacks people are getting tired of the problem. Solve this Islamist thing, or the people will.

    Name it the ‘ism’ of your choice….whatever. Guilt can only work if the populace doesn’t have major fight or flight going on.

    Liked by 5 people

    • al says:

      I found it remarkable that the muslim council of GB rapidly and vociferously denouncing this attack on muslims as islamophobia and as a racist attack. However as you point out for the seemingly endless murderous attacks on our streets we are defend by their silence, and never referring these murderous islamic cowards as christianophobic or racist attacks.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Donna in Oregon says:

        Andrew Breitbart was so far ahead of his time. He passed in 2012 but in times of struggle I always read his quotes. He was spot on. Every time. Take some comfort and read his stuff. He explains it beautifully.

        There is no clear distiction between white supremacy and the multicultual mindset.

        Andrew Breitbart

        Liked by 4 people

  3. LibertyVibe says:

    I believe this and the apartment fire were Muslim on Muslim. They have switched tactics. First of all, they have no moral compunction against misrepresenting themselves, if it serves Islam. Second: Any Muslim that they kill in these false flag events, can die a Martyr for Allah. Yet, they can blame their enemy for the kill. It is a “win/ win” situation…as long as the people fall for it.

    Liked by 10 people

  4. Wink says:

    One thing for sure, the next election for mayor of London will have a heavy turnout. Hopefully, London will survive the present mayor term.

    Liked by 6 people

  5. TakeBackOurRepublic says:

    The native population has finally reached their boiling point.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. mailmannz says:

    Watch how quickly the media will latch on to this as an example of right wing extremism. There will not be the same tip toeing around the media exhibited but a mere couple weeks ago around the guys motive for carrying out the attack!

    Liked by 4 people

    • nuthinmuffin says:

      compare the immediate declaration of terrorism for this attack to the decisions to slow walk former attacks by islamists

      Liked by 3 people

    • Maggie says:

      Just sayin…..
      The white van was hired from a town in South Wales, this area is a sewer of lefties –
      how that will fit with, ‘right wing extremism’, narrative we shall see.

      Liked by 1 person

      • nuthinmuffin says:

        if the u s media will make up the term “white hispanic”, they’ll come up with a similar construct to float their narrative. no doubt, it’s who they are.

        Liked by 1 person

  7. moe ham head says:

    let the games begin

    Like

  8. OS says:

    The last news about the revenge? attack spreading among muslims and leftists at twitter and more. Blatant lies.:

    From Sky News and a witness named Adhil
    “It doesn’t take anyone to work out what has happened. This is blatantly a response to what has happened in London Bridge. But, I would like to say that the response time by the police was ridiculous. It took the police one hour to come. I don’t understand why it took them so long to come.»

    “When the London Bridge attack happened it was a six-minute response time, when Lee Rigby’s attack happened it was a four minute response time and on top of that, the ambulance response time was ten minutes.

    “Today the ambulance took 45 minutes to come.”

    The Police and rescue people tells that: “Officers were in the immediate vicinity as the attack unfolded and responded instantly. Additional officers arrived within 10 minutes.” Instantly reaction. Ambulances arrived after 14 minutes.

    Leftists and muslims in usual modus operandum to create a false narrative of racism etc. They do not care about the the danger of the hate this create.

    Further – here is a leftist revealing the lefts double standards, lies, cognitive dissonanse and more:
    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCqAKk8UQAAf4CM.jpg:large

    Liked by 4 people

  9. JoAnn Leichliter says:

    Well, we shall see, I guess. “Eye witnesses” saw 3 guys with knives–nope, not so. The perp was heard to yell that he was going to kill Muslims; maybe, but no recording of that on the available videos. Perp was said to be on video waving to the crowd and/or blowing kisses as he taken into custody. Videos I see show him saying something we cannot hear, but from ground to police vehicle his hands never appear, seem to be secured behind his back. He never looks especially pleased.
    One version of story was that people were in the street, gathered around a man who had collapsed earlier. The collapsed man is, thus far, the only fatality and no one knows his cause of death. One wonders whether, perhaps, this was a nasty accident, understandably perceived by those involved, given recent London events, as a deliberate attack. Maybe, maybe not; maybe someday we will find out. Certainly it did not occur “just outside the mosque,” but rather a couple of blocks away, near an Islamic center of some sort.

    Liked by 3 people

    • James W Crawford says:

      I am wanting more facts too.

      Whilebwe can not yet be certain what happenned, there is no doubt that the native Britons are being attacked not just by the Islamic radical immigrants but by their own police and government.

      Like

    • I think many people routinely call such a center a “mosque” as a catch-all term.

      Like

  10. GSR says:

    London has been at war for a long time. English have now begun to fight back.

    See what mass immigration created by the globalists has started?

    Like

  11. Moishe Pipik says:

    I’m certainly don’t endorse this form of “justice” (assuming the alleged attack was what it has been reported to be.)

    But equally disturbing is the Left’s response! “See!” they say! “We’re just like them–maybe even worse!”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Don Monfort says:

      Well, there are a lot of comments here that seem to be celebratory, or yammering about false flag and the usual conspiratorial BS. A lot of hypocrisy. If this character plowed into a crowd of Mooslims and shouted that he wanted to kill all Mooslims, then this is by definition an act inspired by “Islamaphobia/racism”. Let’s be honest about it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Except the trend is your friend. And there’s no trend for this type of attack and there is a trend for a different perp. The fact that the media will lie to us doesn’t help. Doesn’t mean they’re lying now. Just means we can never be sure.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Don Monfort says:

          You are entitled to your prejudices and your assumptions, Mumu. And if you can never be sure, then you can never be proven wrong. A very comfortable position you put yourself in. Enjoy.

          Like

          • AM says:

            Yes, that’s liberal thinking in 2017. We can never rely on patterns that we see, so doubt and we can never be proven wrong. We can worship science, because past experiments always predict the future. But with people, who knows. It’s just all wild cards from generation to generation. Right.

            Liked by 1 person

          • dalethorn says:

            As an individual citizen you are entitled to think that way, but if police and sheriffs thought that way, we’d be overrun by criminals and barbarians. I read some lengthy press on this today, and this incident has effectively shifted the public’s concern about numerous radical Muslim attacks to sympathy for these Muslims, and by extension Muslims in Britain in general. That does not fit the long-term pattern, and we would be foolish to lower our guard on a one-off incident.

            Like

            • Don Monfort says:

              Some of you people are just as irrational as the Islamofascists. You are justifying what may well be a terrorist attack on random people, who may or may not all be Muslims, because they done it first. I am all for killing our enemies. Killed my share of commies in the old days, but I never murdered anybody. That is wrong and cowardly. I thought most of you folks here are Christians.

              Liked by 1 person

      • AM says:

        ” by definition an act inspired by “Islamaphobia/racism”. Let’s be honest about it.”

        Yeah, so what? At what point do we fight back? Tired of watching people die because we’re the “good guys”. We’re not. We’re cowards.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Don Monfort says:

          I commend your honesty, AM. Are you going to fight back, or just cheer others on to indiscriminately mow people down?

          Like

          • Don, I’m holding out to see who this guy is and what he is about…if we can get the truth out of the MSM. If they put him in general population, we’ll never know. Remember the guy with the ham sandwich on the mosque doors? He died for that stunt.

            No matter what it is, at some point the people of Europe are going to need to rise up to protect their way of life and countries. Their governments aren’t going to protect them and they won’t be able to vote out those in power. It won’t be allowed. What do you suggest those people do? Die like the Christians and the Copts in the ME?

            Liked by 6 people

          • AM says:

            “I commend your honesty, AM. Are you going to fight back, or just cheer others on to indiscriminately mow people down?”

            I’m waiting for you to tell me. You seem to be the “cheer others on to indiscriminately mow people down” side, aka Islam.

            How should I respond? Right now it’s teddy bears, candles, and ignore the blood in the streets from governments because “Islamophobia”. Even closing the borders, even travel bans are unthinkable because “Islamophobia”

            If a government fail to protect the native population, regardless of form, they are objective failure.

            So you tell me – what should people do? How should they react? More teddy bears? Cheer on importing more Muslims? Pay more taxes?

            Liked by 4 people

          • FanGirl says:

            I heard a military explanation a few days ago. You have perpetrator, co-conspirators, accessories, and bystanders. Which are you when it comes to Radical Islamic Extremism? What role is our government playing? Where is the acceptable ‘red line’ – is it ok for our government to be ‘bystanders’? ‘accessories’?

            Liked by 1 person

          • dalethorn says:

            Why not be honest and say what you think about radical Muslims? Because that’s the thing that THIS incident has the ability to turn people’s attention away from.

            Like

            • Don Monfort says:

              You are a winner, AM. Stick with that story.

              As for my friend dale, I would gladly go to Syria and kill a lot of Mooslem bad guys if I didn’t have a young son and I already did my time in the service of truth, justice and the American way, including my share of killing our enemies. I wasn’t averse to a little of the physical persuasion that they call torture now. But I draw the line at murder. A lot of the characters here seem to be fine with indiscriminate murder.

              This will be my last comment. I don’t associate with this type of people.

              Like

      • Nonsense! If, in fact, it is proven that he shouted about killing all Muslims (which we do not yet know) and if, in fact, it was not simply an accident (which we do not know), it cannot be termed Islamaphobia or racism. It would be a revenge attack, pure and simple.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Moishe Pipik says:

          Interesting about “Revenge Attacks!” On NPR this morning they were talking about how well behaved the Moslims who held the alleged attacker were, by making sure an angry mob didn’t kill him. It would be understandable if a mob did kill him, they reasoned.

          So if it’s “understandable” that a group of Moslems would attack a man who attacked them, why isn’t it “understandable” that a non-Moslem would attack Moslems to get back for Manchester, London Bridge, etc.

          (I’m not saying it’s moral or just to enact revenge like this, I’m just pointing out how inconsistent Lefty reporting is.)

          Liked by 6 people

      • Joe says:

        “Lets be honest about it.” Yes, he learned to use a van this way from the Muslims. Reminds me of what the last emperor of Rum said about everything good about Mohammedanism existed in the world before it arrived and everything that was new about it was evil.

        Liked by 2 people

      • 7delta says:

        I agree we should be honest about it. If the guy was drunk or he intentionally drove into the crowd, for whatever reason, he’s committed a crime. We don’t know yet.

        Also, since we’re being honest, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. It’s a made-up term, created in the bowels of the International Islamic Institute of Thought (IIIT) and pushed by a variety of Islamic organizations, such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and Muslim Brotherhood fronts. The IIIT is an Islamic think tank on how to advance Islam. They took their cue from the left’s revolving accusations of various fake phobias to silence opposition.

        Secondly, Islam is not a race. It’s a political ideology of conquest, achieved through deceit and “the sword”, veiled as a religion. 64% of the content found in Islam’s three “holy” books, Qu’ran, Hadith and Sira, is political. A mere 36% deals with religion. All three spend more time on killing infidels than on anything else. Its prime directive is to force the entire world into submission to Shariah Law. Islam is total life system. It covers everything from conquest, how to wipe yourself after answering nature, what to eat, how to have sex, how to dress, etc. Islam prohibits its followers from assimilation into non-Shariah compliant countries. There is concepts in Islam about free will or a Golden Rule. The differences between “good and bad” Muslims is another topic.

        If this guy attempted to harm Muslims specifically, then he was wrong, and was motivated by reasons known only to him, at this point. Running down random people with a van is not self-defense. Aerating a jihadist in the middle of a violent jihadist’s act, by emptying an entire mag of the caliber of choice, is self defense.

        Reality is that no one is Islamophobic, because it’s a fake diagnosis. Fear of, or disagreement with, any belief, idea or ideology is not an irrational fear, if the disagreement is founded in fact or a simple disagreement on the validity of the issue. Islam is what it is. Contrary to what the OIC said in its “Islamphobia Report”, Islamphobia is not the new racism. That’s fake too.

        Liked by 5 people

        • 7delta says:

          There is concepts in Islam about free will or a Golden Rule.

          That should read, “There are NO concepts in Islam…”

          Liked by 1 person

          • John Denney says:

            I doubt there’s a concept of, “God is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble”, either.
            Perhaps that is why many blacks in the U.S. turn to Islam – Black Pride meets a religion unopposed to pride.
            I was taught that a truly humble man cannot be offended. The haughty are easily offended.

            “The Few. The Proud. The Marines” is a different sense of the word; Marines are not haughty and easily offended.

            Liked by 1 person

            • dalethorn says:

              A marine would be offended by people who spit on a flag that millions of our people fought and died defending, so that others could be free. Marines understand that freedom comes at a price, but liberals/Leftists use those freedoms as a license to be a nuisance, or worse.

              Like

      • James F says:

        You certainly are a gullible one.

        Original eyewitnesseses interviewsed by Sky stated the witness said nothing.

        The “kill muslims” narrative did not appear until several hours afterthe fact in a buzfeed article.

        Witnesses also claimed there were two other attackers with knives and a muslim was stabbed.

        Scotland Yard verified these were blatant lies.

        These muslim witnesses can not be trusted.

        Liked by 5 people

  12. Ozzie says:

    You can’t believe anything in news or media anymore, maybe never could. I guess you could describe the media as a multiple headed beast devouring all it can in destruction. I even can see how someone could ride that beast into a place of power, and rule over all or much of the civilized world. I can also see how as this carnage grows, it can consume most of the population or all, if not stopped. And nobody seems willing or able to stop it.
    When our selfish desires rule, our appetite is never satisfied.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. robins111 says:

    Have the police charged the driver with Cultural Appropriation yet??

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Brant says:

    I can’t remember where I read it, but I think I read that a spokesperson for one of the London centers for the indicated religion had the title of, “secretary general”. What other religion in the entire world has a title like that? I’m familiar with more benign things like, secretary, secretary/treasurer, etc.

    Like

  15. It’s getting harder everyday to read CTH for some reason my computer jumpsaround and don’t want to scroll. The same thing happens on AT. It took me four times to write this because it kept jumping back up to story. Are there any of you having this problem.

    Liked by 1 person

    • dalethorn says:

      For me it varies with the time and the topic. If a really hot topic starts and I’m replying early, my iPad keeps aborting the page and everything I wrote. I imagine the CTH servers are under a heavy “watch” by some of its anarchist enemies.

      Like

      • mimbler says:

        Yes, my ipad does that as well, but never on my mac. The mac has an adblock on it but the ipad doesn’t. I need to see if there is a similar app for the ipad, as it is really frustrating to be way down in the comments and have it reload you back to the top,
        Mike

        Like

    • Molly Pitcher says:

      I finally put a free ad blocker on and it stopped mine from jumping around.Try that?

      Like

  16. Molly Pitcher says:

    Neil Basu, the Met Police’s deputy assistant commissioner
    He said: “The attack unfolded while a man was already receiving first aid from members of the public at the scene, and sadly that man has died.
    “Any causative link between his death and the attack will form part of our investigation. It is too early to state if his death was as a result of this attack.
    “At this early stage of the investigation no further suspects have been identified or reported to the police.
    ‘”There are no reports of any people suffering any knife injuries.(from express.co.uk)

    I wonder why they haven’t released the driver’s name? The eyewitness reports saying there were accomplices must have been lies.

    Like

    • yellowrosetx says:

      So this is definitely an “attack” and not an “incident”? Was it drunk driving or premeditated malice? is this pandering or strategic ambiguity while the investigation slowly slides into obscurity? The Met Police are being cagey—and can’t say that I blame them.

      Like

      • Molly Pitcher says:

        They are being cagey. It’s a hard place to be in, this incident has galvanized the idea that islamophobia is worse than any nail bomb, any street or club carnage, the sexual assaults…. All those super quiet peaceful muslims who wouldn’t speak out against radicals have now found their voice and are so afraid. I might add too if the comments at
        https://twitter.com/hashtag/FinsburyPark?src=hash are any indication ..the small minority that has the guts to still speak negatively about radical islam will probably be facing charges soon.

        Like

        • Worse even that Rotherham? Not hard to best that, considering the authorities conspired to cover it up and punished people who brought it to their attention. IIRC, there were no charges filed against those rapists.

          Like

  17. yy4u says:

    Some observations:

    I notice that the perp. is designated as a “white man”.

    Since when are perpetrators designated by color? When an African-American commits a crime, s/he is never identified as “black” — only by description (5’something, one hundred something, black hair, brown eyes, etc). Then maybe a photograph. If so the only way to know the race of the perp. But if the perp is white — right away, a “white man”.

    The Muslims who burned cars in Paris a few years back were described as “youths”. When non-white kids go on a rampage in America, they, too, are “youths”. Yet this guy is immediately identified by his race. Why?

    Why are Muslims identified by religion? Why not race? Muhammed Ali is African-American. If he had committed a crime, would his race have been mentioned? Cat Stevens (Yusef Islam) is white. If he commits a crime, will he be identified as “white”? Or has he atoned for his tone (pun intended) by converting to Islam?

    Who is the perp? Is he a Christian? Or more likely a Secularist since Europe is running out of Christians? Maybe a Buddhist or a Hindu? Or even a Pagan? Why is he identified by color when Muslims are identified by religion and blacks not identified by any designation but their description.

    Inquiring minds want to know.

    Liked by 6 people

    • CountryclassVulgarian says:

      Agree with your observations. We have thousands of dead people who were also just going about their lives when they were mercilessly murdered by practitioners of the religion of hate and rape and now one said practitioner may or may not have been kicked by a “white man” and somehow that’s the same thing?

      Didn’t the sultan of London say that this is the norm and Westerners must get used to there new reality? Well shouldn’t practitioners of the religion of hate and rape who live in the west “get used to it too?.

      I am highly suspicious of this “incident” and the fact that they are only referring to the perp as “a white man”. I expect the narrative that this is a “revenge act” to fall apart very quickly. That’s the reason no further details about this “white man” has been released.

      My spidey very fake news sense is on full red alert.

      Liked by 3 people

  18. dododo says:

    Time for muslims to grow up and take adult responsibility for the carnage in their awful name

    Like

  19. THE WRATH OF THE AWAKENED SAXON
    by Rudyard Kipling

    It was not part of their blood,
    It came to them very late,
    With long arrears to make good,
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    They were not easily moved,
    They were icy — willing to wait
    Till every count should be proved,
    Ere the Saxon began to hate.

    Their voices were even and low.
    Their eyes were level and straight.
    There was neither sign nor show
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not preached to the crowd.
    It was not taught by the state.
    No man spoke it aloud
    When the Saxon began to hate.

    It was not suddenly bred.
    It will not swiftly abate.
    Through the chilled years ahead,
    When Time shall count from the date
    That the Saxon began to hate.

    (My Kipling book calls this “Beginnings” and has “English” instead of “Saxon”)

    Liked by 4 people

    • Wend says:

      I have to get a Kipling poems book, One of the amazing experiences of my life was listeining to Marxist, anti-imperialist Chris Hitchens reeading Kipling poetry. Beautifully, of course! Miss ya Chris.

      Like

  20. ilovevictoriasbows says:

    Southern Poverty Law Ctr will try to pin this one on a white Christian. Allahu snackbar is hollered in every muslim attack. “Hoc maximum Iesu Christi!”, never. Never in the name of Christ. Big difference in the two religions, no?

    Like

  21. Ronny says:

    Jeremy Clarkson went from roughing up Irish mopes to mashing muzzers, go Jeremy!!

    Like

  22. Avi says:

    Was it a native Englishman?

    Like

  23. James F says:

    The Imam debunked the lies about the driver yelling about killling muslims.

    http://news.sky.com/story/live-driver-deliberately-headed-into-crowd-10919848

    “08:24
    Imam says the attacker did not speak to him – but another community leader intervenes to say the attacker did speak, before the imam arrived and said ‘I did my bit’ and ‘you deserve it’.”

    The “community leader” is obviously lying becaise the Imam also verified he was there the whole time.

    “8:26
    Imam says the deceased person collapsed, was being tended to, regained consciousness, and then the van drove into people. Does not confirm whether the van hit the deceased man – says a post-mortem will have to establish how he died.”

    Liked by 3 people

  24. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Hint to Muslim “refugees” living in Western lands . . . Don’t go wandering out into the street after midnight jihadi pep talks because you might get run over by a drunk driver … or someone just driving too fast coming around the corner.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Jim in TN says:

    They have identified the driver. Dad of 4 from Cardiff Wales. (Manchester suicide bombing was in Wales.)

    http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/19/london-crash-van-slams-into-crowd-leaving-mosque-one-arrested.html

    Like

  26. Molly Pitcher says:

    Wonder why he drove 3 hrs to commit his terror attack there. No mosques in Wales?

    Like

    • FanGirl says:

      Vehicle accident of opportunity. It wouldn’t have mattered who hit the people standing in the street, it’s Islamaphobia… just like everything that happens here is raycissss.

      Like

  27. the community would now see more police, including armed officers, in the area, “particularly around religious establishments”

    But, will this impact their ability to conduct jihad against the infidels?

    Liked by 1 person

  28. James F says:

    The suspect’s muslim neighbors speak kindly of him. This man is being framed as an “islamaphobic terrorist” by the media and politicians.

    Taxi driver Saleem Naema, 50, said: “I can’t believe it. I know him. I’ve lived here for five years, he was already living here when I moved in.

    “If I ever needed anything he would come. I just can’t believe that he did that. I am a Muslim.”

    A man is arrested and put in the back of a police van after the collision in north London. Pic: Isa Amir
    Video:
    Police arrest man amid angry crowd
    Khadijeh Sherizi, who lives next door to Osborne, said: “I saw him on the news and I thought ‘oh my God’ that is my neighbour.

    “He has been so normal. He was in his kitchen yesterday afternoon singing with his kids.

    “He was the dad of the family. He has kids. He lives next door. He seemed polite and pleasant to me.”
    http://news.sky.com/story/suspect-in-london-van-attack-identified-as-darren-osborne-10920634

    Liked by 1 person

  29. hellinahandbasket says:

    Daily Mail’s very first report of the incident stated “White male” as 1st two words of the headline, then within an hour, “White male” was removed. I didn’t think to screenshot it at the time, wish I had.

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Shaw Mar says:

    A rental vehicle? I’m sure he’s in violation of the rental agreement. There must be something in the agreement that says you can’t run people over.

    Like

  31. Anne says:

    My first impression is that the MSM are overplaying the “racist” card because the perpetrator is White. It seems that ALL lives matter, but MUSLIM lives matter more…

    Like

  32. average Joe says:

    All i want to know, is did they release the name yet?

    Like

  33. severance23 says:

    I’ve been following this story over here in the U.K. all day and the authorities and the media are really pulling out all the stops on this one because, finally, they think they’ve found an instance of ‘native Brit on Muslim’ violence. But the whole story doesn’t add up, and feels more like a minor road traffic accident in the early hours of the morning rather than a terrorist attack

    Like

    • Molly Pitcher says:

      Agree. I still want to know why he was in the area? He picked that mosque out of all the mosques between his home and there? Is there some history of hating muslims? Not so far. By now, his life should be an open book especially since he’s the poster person ‘proving’ the islamophobia monster under the bed.
      It blows my mind that not one pol is honest enough or brave enough to say the obvious.*.if * it was a deliberate attack…do any of them think that after one violent deadly gruesome attack after another that eventually somebody might say I’ve had enough and I’m going to fight the enemy that keeps killing my countrymen/women/children ?? That’s the only representation there is of the “enemy” ..the people who go to the mosques that crank out the terrorists. Even if it was to admit that maybe so much blood running in the EU streets could make a sane person snap?

      Like

  34. yellowrosetx says:

    I’m starting to feel a real Richard Jewell vibe to this story. Ugh.

    Like

    • Molly Pitcher says:

      One thing is certain..it’s been a lalapallooza for the politicians. The focus is all on them and how great they are and now finally the people can unite in hating hate. Funny, that shoulda been a no-brainer before now but…now it’s true.. and let’s forget about that disastrous fire . And where is the detailed report on injuries? Are they life-threatening? Broken bones? It’s as if the only fact is ..he’s white.

      Liked by 1 person

      • yellowrosetx says:

        Oh yes….the fire….in a government housing building. Dead muslims in London with voices crying for answers. Instead of giving them any, lets grab this bright shiny thing—the media will go along—it just dropped in our laps and will take the heat off. Damn, I’m cynical.

        Like

      • Maggie says:

        Also when you google Cardiff it has 17 mosques in it! Why drive to London?
        Another also – this all fits in with Theresa May promising to start clamping down in the internet – they will say it is to stop the “Far Right”.

        Like

  35. Ziiggii says:

    a lot of people think this is Taqiyya in full effect! Rumor has been going around that this guy was just driving drunk and also noted that 1) the mosque is 4 blocks away

    AND
    2) the person that died was already receiving first aid for an apparent heart attack when the incident happened

    Like

  36. severance23 says:

    That picture that Ziiggii has posted shows the main flaw in the whole terrorism angle – Whadcoat St. is a small cul-de-sac. If you’re going to run people over, it’s not the sort of street you’d choose to do it in.

    Like

    • Molly Pitcher says:

      The questioner was deliberately obtuse. The London Bridge “incident” was clearly a terror attack because ran over people then got out and ran down the lane stabbing people. Yeah..not too hard to call it terror right off the bat.. .

      Liked by 1 person

  37. Donna in Oregon says:

    Now that I’ve seen the picture of him. Is he drunk?

    Like

  38. Molly Pitcher says:

    We know that he’s white.^ We know he’s 47 ^…Where did he rent the truck? Was it in his name? What did he tell the clerk he needed it for? Was he familiar with Finsbury Park area? Did he hang out in pubs bitchin about politics and such?

    Like

  39. Realist says:

    Londonistan’s TERRORIST CONSORTING and DEFENDING MUSLIM ACTIVIST MAYOR immediately pronounced this a TERRORIST OUTRAGE before the bodies had even hit the floor and promised DRASTIC measure to protect MUSLIMS from future outrages. What a STARK contrast to his MUTED and reserved reaction to the three MURDEROUS MUSLIM TERRORISTS on a vehicular rampaging across Londonistan then jumping out screaming ‘Allahu Akbar’ and stabbing and slashing people with knives as they did so.

    Like

  40. Realist says:

    On BBC NEWS, the UK’s CNN, well of course that must be true then LOL

    Like

    • Realist says:

      Oh and the ‘WITNESSES’ were all MUSLIMS and we all know what TAQIYYA is don’t we , you can’t trust a word that comes out of a Muslim mouth especially when talking about something that will either be to their ADVANTAGE or to their DISADVANTAGE, Islam is the ONLY religion that not only ALLOWS its followers to LIE but actively ENCOURAGES them to do so.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s