Tucker Carlson Interviews Goofy Jill Stein Campaign Manager About Election Recount…

Oof…  Take a large dose of obtuse double-speak, blend in a batch of cognitive dissonance, and bake at the highest possible level of moonbattery.

Soylent Green

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

213 Responses to Tucker Carlson Interviews Goofy Jill Stein Campaign Manager About Election Recount…

  1. sansa2016 says:

    It’s not a recount that they want.
    They want to get their hands on some of the voting machines and then make the claim that
    there is evidence they were hacked.
    Then they find a sympathetic (liberal) judge to rule the states vote is invalid.
    Then they take it to the SCOTUS which is 4:4 since Scalia is gone… what a coincidence!?
    The SCOTUS hangs and the lower court ruling stands… the states votes are invalidated.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thorfinnr says:

      I was thinking like you at first, but then why Michigan which has no voting machines? I think it’s more likely the other scenario I’ve heard. They’re trying to delay by drawing out recounts to make states miss the Electoral College due date. They want to remove the pressure of a mandate from voters, and put the selection in the hands of politicians and judges, establishment types who will be more susceptible to seeing the chaos as an opportunity rule or vote against Trump under cover of a ‘unique’ situation.

      Liked by 3 people

      • phantom3D says:

        I have a theory involving the electoral college Suppose Trump is under pressure to appoint romney and other elites in order to secure the EC vote? I believe this is why he is dragging out the secretary of state decision, he does not want romney but depending on how these recounts go he may not have enough solid EC votes without the establishment elites. If the establishment (Both repub and dems in this) can tie up Michigan, Wisconsin, and PA, Trump starts out with only 260 votes to clintons 232 votes, and the establishment may have enough “faithless” votes to give it to clinton unless Trump plays ball. If the establishment is not able to tie up those votes in a recount, Trump will have enough true votes that he does not need the establishment.

        Liked by 2 people

  2. Lanna says:

    Stein and Cobb should be asked about the Green Party’s open letter.

    “The decision to pursue a recount was not made in a democratic or a strategic way, nor did it respect the established decision making processes and structures of the Green Party of the United States (GPUS). The recount has created confusion about the relationship between the Green and Democratic parties because the states chosen for the recount are only states in which Hillary Clinton lost. There were close races in other states such as New Hampshire and Minnesota where Clinton won, but which were not part of the recount. And this recount does not address the disenfranchisement of voters; it recounts votes that were already counted rather than restoring the suffrage of voters who were prevented from voting.”

    http://www.flowersforsenate.org/greens_speak_out_recount

    Liked by 3 people

  3. dbobway says:

    Tucker is showing some good interview skills.

    I wonder how long his boss is going to let him seek the truth.

    He stated a perfect example, be using the experts coming onto a perfectly good plane and checking if it is going to blow up.

    I have a pretty steady resolve.

    BUT, I must admit if a judge somehow gets to call this election the other way?

    It is a dark and foreboding place my mind takes me.

    Obama, staying away from this may be the most comforting thing he has ever done for me in 8 years.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Sunflower says:

      Obama is notorious for saying one thing and doing the opposite (I’m shocked you haven’t figured this out yet). Nothing about that spitball is comforting to me!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Kenyon Hull says:

      Tucker is showing his ignorance of fraud in voting. Tucker, educate yourself and go to http://www.blackboxvoting.org. Then you will, at least, understand how easily the vote can be turned at will by evil people.

      Like

      • Smplyamsd says:

        Since the right has been pointing out the risk of these machines for a decade and the left has been fighting/ignoring the claims that whole time, you would think this would be a perfect opportunity for a bi-partisan effort to put systems in place, like a paper trail, like drivers license before voting, elimination of vote by mail, etc…. The right should be jumping in with both feet, and saying: ” we all have concerns and lets join together to fix it so that it CAN’T happen in the future”. This will require the leftists to put up or shut up.

        Like

  4. EarlPHolt3rd says:

    Why would a good Irish girl like Jill Stein want to expose the “Democrat” Party’s heavy reliance on the electoral strategy of voter fraud…?

    Like

  5. Rob says:

    Just as “Kennedy” failed to point out to Stein, Carlson failed to point out to Cobb that Michigan USES PAPER BALLOTS.

    That means even imbeciles like Stein and Cobb recognize that Michigan does NOT HAVE VOTING MACHINES.

    And yet no one has pointed this out to either one of them.

    Liked by 3 people

    • joshua says:

      don’t confuse idiots with FACTS…..it makes them crazier and louder. This too will pass…like a national bowel movement.

      Liked by 1 person

    • NC Patriot says:

      Why did Michigan agree to do a recount? From what I’ve heard, there is no legal reason for doing so in Michigan. Also, I wish there was some pushback from Trump’s legal team. Where are they?

      Like

  6. Christine says:

    Jill Stein Perpetrating Election Fraud By Jander Research: http://janderresearch.blogspot.com/2016/11/there-will-be-no-recount-in.html

    Jander’s Report clearly describes all laws that were broken by Jill. It’s time for Trump to drain the Swamp and apply the “Rule of Law” to Prosecute Jill in a Court of Law and in the Press.

    To Prosecute Jill will insure that no one will ever try to alter a Presidential Election in the future. If you do not prosecute; this will happen again…maybe in 4 years. Hillary/Soros/Globalist is going to work really hard in the next 4 year to steal the Election in 2018/2020. Now is the time to implement Voter ID for all elections. That is why the Hillary Investigation must continue for her Emails/Clinton Foundation, to make sure it will never happen again…maybe Hillary’s involvement in trying to Alter an Election.

    Since Jill/Hillary/Soros opened the door to election fraud; it’s time for Trump to drain the Swamp and investigate several of Hillary’s States including California for illegal immigrants voting Fraud; if not Now, when. Voter Id must be implemented.

    Wisconsin GOP files federal complaint alleging illegal Stein-Clinton coordination yesterday:
    http://wbay.com/2016/11/30/wisconsin-gop-files-federal-complaint-alleging-illegal-stein-clinton-coordination/
    I was waiting for this….excellent move.

    PA…Attorneys still has several Legal Hurdles to stop the recount. Monday a Judge will decide if there will be a state wide recount. Unfortunately, it appears Jill will be able to count many precincts in PA to divide the country which feeds into the corrupt media.

    Jill’s Recount is beyond any reasonable doubt: based on speculation and is conducted as “fishing expeditions.” Jill Knowingly is creating false arguments to request recounts. (FRAUD)…Trying to Alter a Presidential Election. Jill and her representatives are on the News Circuit telling the Press she has the right to all these recounts. There has not been one News Broadcast that takes this to task like the Jander Research….which is just like the press not reporting the Hillary’s emails or the Clinton Foundation.

    I appreciate all the help by “Posters at CTH” in pointing to several Recount update Articles.

    Liked by 4 people

    • olderwiser21 says:

      Thank you for the explanation……I appreciate all you smart people at CTH!!!

      Liked by 1 person

    • Smplyamsd says:

      Yes. I have been thinking the same thing: this is an opportunity to force the leftists to allow voter ID and other vote integrity measure to be taken. Am I missing something ? Is this a clever leftist setup that is going over my head ?

      Like

  7. laurelmarycecilia says:

    Cobb gives all it at 5:50……….. the $$ collected is for current recount and “…future recount…” or “…election integrity…” OR in plain language… for Jill Stein’s next campaign. Stein didn’t get the necessary minimum of 5% of the popular vote to be eligible in the future for federal campaign funds. ta-da

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Bob Thoms says:

    Drudge Breaking News Headline: Megyn Kelly may be leaving Fox !

    Good riddance……………………………..

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Kenyon Hull says:

    To see how voting machines are subject to tampering and fraud, go to http://www.blackboxvoting.org. Not that I agree that these people ought to be doing this recount when they have no chance of becoming president. The voting systems in America are controlled by four companies with software that cannot be checked because it is proprietary. One company’s software is called GEM and controls 25% of the vote systems and can be changed at will in about 60 seconds if a company employee or surrogate can get their hands on the voting system. Easy enough to do. There are weaknesses in the voting system but this is not the time or place to address the issues.

    Like

  10. Christine says:

    Someone here posted: BOMBSHELL: 15 electors will refuse to vote for Trump and are lobbying other electors to follow suit! https://www.youtube.com/watch?

    HELP…
    I have no understanding how this works. Someone stated these are probably Hillary’s States…Are we sure the 15 electors are not part of Trumps 306 total…and therefore his electors would only be 291???? I hope this is a fake story…

    Like

    • Christine says:

      Researched Elector Votes:
      Several Sources has validated that 15 electors will not vote for Trump…the electors will be fined and they are willing to pay the fine of the laws of the state they represent. (Maybe Hillary will pay) Maybe this is a fake story…

      There are 7 protect electors who are supposed to cast their elector vote to Hillary; but will cast their vote to another republican voter…anyone but Trump. They are also going to pay the fine.

      This of course will reduce Hillary’s Elector votes.

      Hillary plan is to reduce Donald Elector’s vote combined with a possible elimination of MI, WI or PA to get him below 270. They are working on different in conjunctions with electors and recounts to get Trump below 270.

      They are trying to cause Constitutional Crises

      I hope my thought process is incorrect…connecting the dots all point to this.

      Like

  11. I don’t know if David Cobb is a child molester or not, but perhaps I should file a report with his local authorities, just in case, so they can investigate. Should they find he is not actually a child molester, I’m sure he and everyone who knows him will be even more happy and satisfied, perhaps grateful, that I initiated this investigation.

    Like

  12. EWSoCal says:

    I feel kinda “tin-foil hat” for just thinking this but when he mentions thousands of transactions averaging $47 (exceeding the amount raised for the Jill Stein campaign itself), is it possible that hackers have sold credit card information to a shadowy bundler who processes “thousandsoftransactionsaveraging$47” on behalf of this recount? Why would a grass roots group of real humans all spend an average of $47 to perpetuate something they have no stake in?

    Like

  13. skyborn78 says:

    If, by some wild chance, Jillary steals this election, what you saw with the snowflakes will be a tornado with patriots. They better leave it alone.

    Like

  14. UKExpat says:

    How does somebody who only got 1% qualify to call for a recount what possible benefit to THEM would a recount give even if their vote DOUBLED it would still only be 2%.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s