WikiLeaks Releases Batch #10 John Podesta Emails…

Today WikiLeaks released another batch of emails from the account of life-long Clinton family ‘fixer’ John Podesta,  –AVAILABLE HERE

podesta-emailsPodesta and Clinton

FYI – The date of the release is 10-17-2016 as noted in the upload/release date.  However, there is not an accompanying announcement from WikiLeaks to alert of the release.

Apparently John Podesta, and Karen Finney, were very disappointed the San Bernardino shooters were not white.  – SEE HERE

wikileaks-4

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

339 Responses to WikiLeaks Releases Batch #10 John Podesta Emails…

  1. Trump campaign wants Kennedy step down!

    Liked by 10 people

    • Ziiggii says:

      @1:52:00 Assange talks about the UK & US putting ‘pressure’ on Ecuador” re upcoming @wikileaks releases. This was from the beginning of the month (10/04).

      Liked by 4 people

    • Linda Ruth says:

      Why doesn’t Assange just walk out on his balcony for all to see and hear? Probably because he physically can’t. Opinions he posts keep being updated, as he is able.

      Ex-pat in Mexico says:
      October 17 2016
      NO ONE CUT JULIAN’S INTERNET. FIGURE THIS:

      “Background: Julian is a programmer. That means that before heading to the embassy, Julian, by logic, had a cell phone, a tablet, 3 laptops and a desktop or two. He had, by logic, iternet service from no fewer than three different providers. Perhaps Julian was smart enough to ditch his cell phone as he headed for the embassy, but once there . . . . . .
      Julian has a window. A balcony. A direct outside link where you can look right at him. The embassy also has a front door anyone can walk through. Yet after 4 years of getting worldwide attention with Wikileaks, no one brought him a 3g laptop, cell phones, or anything else? OK, I AM GOING TO CUT TO THE CHASE:”

      “ON A BUDGET OF $500,000 PER YEAR, we are supposed to believe Assange depends on the embassy computers, embassy internet, a line, which can be cut and that he has no cell phone! COME ON NOW, Assange has other people in his organization that could walk right up to the embassy and give him a laptop, tablet, cell phone, EVERYTHING and HE DOES NOT HAVE ONE? HE IS A COMPUTER PROGRAMMER AND WITH THAT BUDGET HAS NO COMPUTER OF HIS OWN?”

      “CONCLUSION: ASSANGE IS EITHER ARRESTED, OR PAMELA TOOK HIM OUT, AND NOT ON A DATE. COME ON NOW, the ludicrousy of it all is beyond the pale, there is NO FREAKING WAY you could just cut his line and be done with it! And that is precisely why I have stuck with the obvious: He’s not online because he cannot physically be online. With all the hoopla he never picked up a phone or walked up to the balcony to say HI? YEAH RIGHT!!!!!! The hoakey bull**** getting spewed is pure comedy!”

      [Much more analysis]
      http://82.221.129.208/basepagem8.html

      Like

      • Ziiggii says:

        This ‘ex-pat’ does not have an effin clue; His ‘logic’ is flawed!

        Like

        • Linda Ruth says:

          Don’t agree, Ziiggii? Prove what you state with some facts of your own!

          Like

        • wasntme says:

          Agree. A lot of assumptions being made with no proof. For example, seems to me that if your a guest inside the embassy, you will get whatever Internet they have. I can’t see the Ecuadorians letting 3+ Internet provider’s in to hook up assange’s connections. And I know plenty of programmers, but don’t know any that carry around 3 laptops, 2 desktops, and tablet. That’s just a stupid comment.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Sandra says:

        I’m sure he has other devices and other means of communication. The wikileaks tweet said “We have activated the appropriate contingency plans”. Assange is laying low, I would too. But the leaks will still occur even while he is silent.

        Like

  2. unseen1 says:

    Trump now posting video chats on twitter. Going right over the head of the media. He just reached 12.5 million people in a heartbeat about the DOJ/FBI/Clinton collusion. Called is a HIGH CRime that means an impeachable offense. What will Speaker Brutus do now?

    Liked by 7 people

  3. Humble Soul says:

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Humble Soul says:

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Humble Soul says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • Keln says:

      Lol…the comments by Hillary supporters. They have the gall to criticize the turnout. Maybe they should worry about turnout to actually events with Hillary present…same size crowd.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. georgiafl says:

    Donald Trump comes up to bat again soon in Green Bay WI – 6pm Central – 7pm EST

    Wonder if he will bring up Wikileaks, Veritas and the Clinton campaign crimes, planned violence, etc?

    Liked by 2 people

  7. WeThePeople2016 says:

    While we are waiting for the rally, something to cheer you all up. Take a look at this newest release!

    Trump Campaign is NOT giving up on Virginia!

    Trump Virginia Office Announces Statewide TV Ad Strategy And Leadership Team

    Some names on the list:
    “John Fredericks – Radio Host”
    “Dave Brat – Congressman, 7th District”
    https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/trump-campaign-announces-virginia-leadership-team

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Humble Soul says:

    Liked by 5 people

  9. cactusclyde says:

    People talk about future civil war. The reality is that it has been going on for years. Most of us just haven’t realized it. We think in terms of mass-action use of firearms if a civil war were to be fought. The enemy thinks in terms that might be thought of like this: We are in a room with a single source of oxygen controlled by a valve outside the room. As different groups of people walk by, the valve is slowly closed. No single group is totally responsible for cutting off the oxygen. We either give in to the demands of the different groups or die from lack of oxygen. It’s easy for each group to deny they want to cut off our oxygen (liberty). They just want safe spaces and trigger warnings; they just want to convince people that white people with their privilege keep POC’s from success; they want people to believe cops are killers; they want us to believe that only the MSM tells us the truth and that giving up control of the internet is a good thing; …if bribes are handled right, it’s OK for politicians to take bribes;…if you don’t have a college education, you are stupid; … that only professional politicians should hold office. I could go on. We need to realize that each of the above actions is a turn of the valve. Our enemy is like a wolf pack – when one wolf darts in to take a bite of our freedom, we turn to look while another darts in from our rear. Stopping one wolf is not enough – the entire wolf back needs to be neutralized. Sorry for the mixed analogies. Oh, and by the way, the enemy occasionally uses a ‘stiletto strike’ like they did with JA. This is my first attempt at posting a comment.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. Abster says:

    I just want to cry when I think of the consequences related to all of this. God, I’ve always preached that you can’t paint a face on evil. Now I know you truly can. It comes w cankles.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Humble Soul says:

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Humble Soul says:

    Liked by 1 person

  13. I feel like skipping home. Finally someone with some backbone taking the fight to the media and the crooks in the uniparty. Top that off with all the wikileaks, O’Keefe, and soon Drudge and it makes this the BEST ELECTION EVER! Think about this. How many people after all this cover up by the media will ever really believe them when they start their ops on Trump when he’s president? Seriously, how many? You totally have to have your head in the clouds (stoned) and your phone up your a$$ to not hear the drumbeat of change.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Humble Soul says:

    Like

  15. amwick says:

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12538 Palmieri wondering about podium again for Mothers of the Movement stump.

    Like

  16. Cymrygirl says:

    So, probably dumb question here from someone who just got home a bit ago and hasn’t been keeping up with this all day, but does this mean that Assange got his internet back, or is this coming from another source connected with him? Apologies for the dumb question, and also if it has been answered upthread and I didn’t see it.

    Like

    • Concerned says:

      I think the data is stored in some secret locations and Assange isn’t needed to release it. But as the head of wikileaks he’s calling the shots. That’s my understanding.

      Like

    • Patriot1783 says:

      I think he also has safeguards in case someone tries to tamper or “bleach” his email disclosures to change their original text.

      Like

  17. amwick says:

    Ok this is funny… HRC wanted to hire and old friend and JPodesta said “Yup. Maybe we can rent the Queen Mary for the next 18 months and fill it with her brothers and assorted crazy hangers on sail around and around.” Can’t make this up https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12730

    Liked by 2 people

  18. wolfmoon1776 says:

    Like

  19. andi lee says:

    Subject: “Hillary and Isreal”
    Date: 2015- (I forgot, already)

    This email is quizzical. HRC is no longer SOS, yet there is urgent push for HRC to make a “statement” re deteriorating relationship spiraling out of control; Isreal’s unconstitutional law; an already in-place extreme border vetting; weak border guard; making contact w/….doesn’t this violate HATCH?

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2034

    Like

    • Concerned says:

      Hmmm. And that was March 2015. She didn’t formally announce her candidacy until April 2015. “The Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations” wanted her to make a statement. I wonder if she did. That would definitely be overstepping her bounds, infringing on Kerry and Obama. We know Obama hates Hillary … does Kerry too?

      Like

      • Concerned says:

        I went on a hunt to see if she had spoken to that group in 2015. I found that she had spoken to them in 2002, when she was in her second year of her first term as Senator. Here she is overstepping her boundaries again.

        I would also like to thank the JCRC and UJA Federation of New York for sponsoring my trip to Israel. And particularly, I want to thank my friends Susie Stern and Ezra Levin for their respective leadership role at the Federation and presidency of the JCRC. […] I have contacted the State Department with respect to its advisory for travel to Israel in comparison to its advisory for travel to Pakistan. I think, as you could hear from the Minister’s description of the difference between the two advisories, it is very out of line with what the reality is and what the prospects are for safe, enjoyable, tourism and business travel. We will continue to try to press the State Department for a more realistic assessment and advisory. You know, it occurred to me that rather than wait for the State Department to change the advisory, I would simply come to Israel myself.

        http://www.womenspeecharchive.org/women/profile/speech/index.cfm?ProfileID=65&SpeechID=356

        I wonder how much money the groups/people mentioned have donated to her and to her slush fund.

        Like

      • Concerned says:

        This article explains that she put out a statement on Mar 29 through Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice president of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. This was before she announced her candidacy! She wasn’t SoS then, she didn’t have any official position. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/30/us/politics/hillary-clinton-wants-to-improve-relations-with-israel.html?_r=0

        Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton told a representative of a group of prominent Jewish leaders on Sunday that she wanted to put the relationship between the United States and Israel back on “constructive footing,” the representative said.

        Mrs. Clinton’s comments, made in a phone call to Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, contrasted in tone from recent remarks by members of the Obama administration, who have publicly criticized Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel amid tensions over a nuclear deal with Iran and comments Mr. Netanyahu made in the final days of his re-election campaign this month.

        “Secretary Clinton thinks we need to all work together to return the special U.S.-Israel relationship to constructive footing, to get back to basic shared concerns and interests, including a two-state solution pursued through direct negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians,” Mr. Hoenlein said in a statement issued by his organization on Sunday evening. “We must ensure that Israel never becomes a partisan issue,” he quoted her as saying. Mrs. Clinton knows Mr. Hoenlein from her time in the Senate.

        A spokesman for Mrs. Clinton confirmed that she had spoken to Mr. Hoenlein, but would not elaborate on what they had discussed or say if he had quoted her accurately.

        So now we know this was all set up. These Jewish leaders didn’t like how Obama and Kerry were handling their situation so they called on Hillary. They must have known she was going to run for President although she didn’t announce it until the following month.

        Liked by 1 person

  20. ALEX says:

    Facebook is friendly. Of course we have known that…

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/13910

    Like

  21. ALEX says:

    Chief political correspondent for POLITICO touching base with Podesta to make sure Johnny liked what he was going to say about Hillary. This is boot licking on a sickening scale…

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12189

    Liked by 1 person

  22. ALEX says:

    Podesta saying maybe they could rent the Queen Mary for eighteen months to sail Hillary’s brothers around and keep them away…

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/12730

    Liked by 1 person

  23. ALEX says:

    Worried about the fact Clinton Foundation pays men way more money then women. HYPOCRITS!!

    https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/14473

    Liked by 2 people

    • Concerned says:

      Wow!

      > Attached is the equal pay hit pulled from the Foundation book. Essentially here are the key take aways:

      3 out of the 11 highest paid employees of the Foundation are women.

      Avg salary of the highest paid men is $294,157.50, while the avg salary of the highest paid women is $181,576.66 ($112K difference)

      Median salary of the highest paid men is $346,106, while the median salary of the highest paid women is $185,386 ($190K difference)

      Can you find the email with the attachment? It might show the employee names and salaries.

      Liked by 1 person

  24. Why is Melania Trump giving interviews to CNN Anderson Cooper.. again talking about women? why is the Trump Team allowing it? keeps focus off wikileaks.. smh

    Liked by 2 people

    • Concerned says:

      I imagine she’s trying to draw in some of the snowflakes who were deeply offended by the p-gate tape. 🙂 By the way, there is still focus on the fake sex scandal regardless of wikileaks. Every once in a while I land on the various news channels to see if they’re reporting on Trump, then I immediately switch. About 50% of the time they’re talking about Trump. They don’t want to report on wikileaks.

      Like

  25. ZZZ says:

    From:nmerrill@hillaryclinton.com
    To: bfallon@hillaryclinton.com
    Date: 2015-06-24 16:32
    Subject: Re: Proposed response to upcoming State Dept disclosure on Sid emails

    https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10258

    Like

  26. wolfmoon1776 says:

    Like

  27. Pam says:

    Liked by 1 person

  28. sDee says:

    The system has always been rigged. It’s just that before Trump stood up, the Republicans went along with it all.

    Like

  29. theduchessofkitty says:

    Here’s something: Journalists at the same table DINING with Clinton staffers right before the launch of her campaign.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/10/17/wikileaks-journalists-clinton-staff-homes-before-hillarys-campaign-launch/

    Like

  30. Lyn says:

    Sundance was spot on about the single microphone vs. microphone bank issue (eye problems).

    Like

    • Sandra says:

      Nothing to lean on and nowhere to hide the scripts she reads from.

      Liked by 2 people

      • And no cheating running teleprompter hidden inside of the podium. Did you notice the second debate, where she just rambled on and on…and I believe she walked up to the audience into Trump’s space trying to drag out the time…thinking that her proximity would wow the crowd and that maybe if she walked and talked…they wouldn’t notice that she said absolute CRAP. She fell apart.

        Liked by 1 person

  31. Concerned Virginian says:

    Gateway Pundit running an article right now about Julian Assange’s Internet access being cut by the Ecuadorian government at the embassy where Assange is living APPARENTLY VERY SHORTLY AFTER the WikiLeaks publication of Hillary’s speeches to Goldman Sachs.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Sandra says:

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Sean Hannity is covering O’keef’s video. He has the guts to do it!

    Liked by 2 people

  34. DNC and Hillary campaign have joint bank accounts. Illegal?

    Robby may be Robby Mook to Hillary Clinton.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Stein nails this.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s