“The Cleaner” Part II – Cleaner Identified – The Plot Thickens…

Unfortunately, this post is going to be severely fragmented.  Our apologies in advance.  However, if anyone can clean up these videos please notify us ASAP in the comments. You’ll see what I mean.

Earlier during our initial review of the debate we identified something that looked entirely suspicious because it is only evidenced for one specific candidate, and one specific lectern. We initially drew attention to it as “The Cleaner”:

debate-cleaner

Well, this intrigue just got a whole lot more interesting.

See “The Cleaner” at work here immediately following the debate:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

The Cleaner has been identified as Brady Williamson, a long time democrat operative and three-decade member of the democrat debate negotiation team:

brady-williamson

Watch:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

(link)

Here’s where it gets even more interesting.  And again, unfortunately no-one is putting these disparate segments together into one cohesive story.  First this video where something electronic is clearly visible on Hillary Clinton’s lectern at the conclusion of the debate. Notice it is not present on Donald Trump’s lectern:

There is definitely something going on there, and we already know these were custom built lecterns (podiums) for each candidate.  Whatever that is on Hillary’s lectern is not seen operational on Donald Trump’s.

Now here’s another video which delves into both “the cleaner”, and the activity in/around the lectern. Unfortunately the uploader’s narrative makes him sound like a loon. Annoyingly, this is a problem we often run into when there is indeed something very important in the content, but the person creating the video’s narrative is over-the-top. This is where CTH really misses having Diwataman as a frequent YouTube contributor.

Watch the video, at least the first 10 minutes, because it is indeed important. [Ignore the entire last 10 minutes] You have to ignore the barking conspiratorial aspects of the person who created it. Focus on the content, not the narration per se’.

It’s the over-the-top conspiracy narration makes videos like this too easy for people to dismiss.  As a result the important facts and truth get hidden or ignored because the creators sound like moonbats. It is frustrating because these videos could be extremely valuable for truth finding.

All of that said, the essential elements remain.  The cleaner, Brady Williamson, was trying to remove, and did eventually remove, something much more than just notes atop the lectern.  Another person also is seen removing something.  All of the key players are very aware of, and very cautious of, the people around them when they are in “cleaning mode”.

POINTS BELOW UNRELATED TO DEBATE – JUST GENERAL ONGOING OBSERVATION

Additionally, there’s entirely too much historic evidence of two things which somewhat relate to what we are seeing in these issues:

#1)  Hillary Clinton has no lower visual field.  We’ve pointed this out for well over a year, her eyesight is compromised in the lower part of her eyesight.   Stairs are a serious issue. Her eyeglasses contain prism lenses, everyone accepts that – however, there’s something beyond that aspect regarding her vision.   More than likely she wears some kind of contact lenses to assist her eyesight.  This might be the issue with her lower field of vision problem when wearing them.  Once you are aware of it, it becomes very noticeable.

hillary-steps

#2)  Again, as pointed out for well over two years – When Hillary Clinton is in a public forum where she will be answering questions, or giving a speech with the potential for follow-ups, she uses a very specific single cordless microphone.

Anytime there is a possibility for her to have an unscripted moment, she always has a single cordless microphone.  Never, even during press events, does she have a bank of microphones or multi-microphones on a podium, pedestal or palate.

Go look for yourself, there’s thousands of videos and pictures.  Even at all Clinton’s recent pressers, even the tarmac ones, it’s always – ALWAYS – a single cordless mic.  Media microphones are never used. EVER.

She uses a double mic for speeches when there’s no risk of “off script”; but when there is a risk of “off script” need, it is always the single cordless mic.  With or without the flexi mic-holder.  Often she chooses to hold the mic in her hands.

Speech:

hillary clinton stroke 1

Press Conference

clinton-presser-tarmac

Always a single cordless mic….

Always.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Clinton Health, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

710 Responses to “The Cleaner” Part II – Cleaner Identified – The Plot Thickens…

  1. Jon says:

    Crooked demorats pulled a head fake on “Clinton’s Americans”, (you know, the ones with the “deer in the headlights” transfixion, about to become their disaster if they don’t wake up before it’s too late?), by the magician’s fraudster’s trick of diverting attention with the classic “now I direct your attention (to the lesser of two evils, that you don’t know about) to this “understandable, you see” podium custom made, please note the subtle size difference, so that “little illary” doesn’t have a disadvantage of looking like the little rat she really is, but rather looks just as big as her opponent!

    She, he, they, provide exemplary example of conduct for the weak, the atheist, and the un-American (no virtue, no ethics, no values!). For the unbecoming Americans. Replete with triple x rated first family (allegedly both), even the public’s children should be kept from debates (of course far too many won’t, to their and our harm!), because of the past and current, according to some.

    (They think at least to themselves, ‘Of course you American suckers, will be stuck mentally on digesting, this strange ‘never been seen before’ sleight of hand diversion of attention “shell game” style, (ala the infamous shell game fraudster “Soapy Smith” and his team), of worrying about our specially engineered, custom podium, but not our slick electronic tricks of medicine and/or communications compartment), that are to keep illary under control, until we finish putting her over on you ‘dumb trusting naïve “hick” rubes’ as our secret Manchurian candidate. ‘Potemkin village’ style, all over again. (Another project of their ‘behavioral psychologists’ no doubt, think deeply upon Russia, soviet, communist style….)

    No question something major, the true back story, is ongoing, far more tricks committed than just this trick, and many demorats are well in on the ‘secret’, though compartmented as to what each team knows, perhaps, to limit the knowledge of the giant, over the top, degree of fraud and deceit clintonians are committing. Among many alinski principles, no question that the advice of “never give a rube a break” is totally operative. How else would you make money, in the government, but lie cheat and steal. A successful corporation founder(s) or head, can sell and become well off, but in a government job, all you can sell is your government to get rich, sell your government and Americans, down the river to hell, by un-American traitors. And there are way too many of them.

    So much for the ‘service’, in ‘government service’. Corrupt, crooked ‘self-service’.

    Clintonians, democrats, are 100% untrustworthy, ever………….Wily Willie, illary, Abedin, wiener, the list is unending…..We are dealing with a professional team of confidence men fraudsters, abetted by chemistry and technology.

    Like

    • Jon says:

      In the no question paragraph, it should have included:
      …many demorats are well in on the ‘secret’, including Howard (‘coke sniffles comment’)Dean (wherein the outgoing public signal video-audio feed, had been tampered with to insert sniffle sound, prominently, and frequently, to sound like a cold, but Dean had to lead the “hick” audience….), but not inside the live studio, as attendees so commented on it, ….

      Like

      • Jon says:

        Could Trump’s ‘mike’ signal tampering be involved with the clearly furtive removal of devices from illary’s podium so surreptitiously demonstrated, in video, by several operatives, post ‘debate’? Wonder if anyone thought to bring a portable scanner or signal analyzer-recorder? Digital or analog style?

        Like

      • Jon says:

        for clarity, should have added: but not inside the live studio, as attendees so commented on it, in Fox TV interviews on the matter, ….where at least two attendees, reported no such sniffles were heard in the live audience feed, inside…….

        Like

  2. Walt says:

    You know what caused this man to be caught on camera was Mr. Trump refusing to immediately shake Lester Holts hand. That is what they needed for their illusion was Trump to go and shake hands knowing the camera would have followed him but his hesitation kept the camera on Hillary’s podium….

    Liked by 8 people

  3. John says:

    Here is one video who covers a bit more of the incident and cleaner man https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os5fe-ADtZA

    Like

  4. facebkwallflower says:

    So, what is up with this? What was thrown in the basket. Why the hand-to-neck gesture?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. entagor says:

    The bulky security lady looked like a guy with a bad black wig. Just saying

    Like

  6. pam2246 says:

    I’m surprised that Steve Bannon didn’t plan for and anticipate this. We brought him up to Alaska to host his film about Sarah Palin, “The Undefeated” in Sarah’s hometown of Wasilla in 2010. He’s a super sharp guy on the tricks of the Left.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Coldeadhands says:

      Good assessment.
      I still have to wonder what the details of the first debate strategy were. I do think something is up. Bannon IS too smart for Trump’s performance to not have been intentional. Perhaps keep a low profile and get a solid read on lefty shenanigans. They did have some success as Sundance & others have demonstrated. Can’t argue with the online polling results from day after.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. Diane says:

    “The Cleaner” looks to me like the same guy as the one in this photograph. That is, he is reportedly a member of Hillary’s campaign staff that she met with in violation of the rules during her prolonged break in the Univision debate (see short, white haired man next to Robby Mook):
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3486497/Did-Clinton-cheat-Univision-debate-Hillary-accused-speaking-campaign-staff-Trump-guilty-offence.html

    Liked by 3 people

  8. sunnydaze says:

    Lou Dobbs is talking about media/moderator corruption at the debate right now….Fox Business News (FBN)

    Liked by 3 people

  9. QuiteContrary says:

    Assuming Hillary’s health problems don’t affect her ability to think and remember, why would she need to cheat using hi-tech equipment? She’s a Yale-educated lawyer who’s been questioned ad nauseum after a lifetime of scandals and investigations. I’ve heard some suggest she got the questions in advance, but there’s no proof of that. It would be extraordinary and would literally FINISH Lester Holt and NBC for all time, so I question that.

    IMO, the most notable thing about this debate was that the moderator didn’t ask this woman who wants to be commander-in-chief about her lying to the country and the families of the dead about the cause of the Benghazi terror attack. After all, e-mails turned over to the courts prove that she told her daughter and a foreign dignitary that it was terrorism even as she pushed the LIE that it was caused by that Internet video.

    Holt also failed to ask her about the multiple requests for increased security from the ambassador ADDRESSED TO HER that she has claimed she never saw. Why didn’t she read these important messages? What did she do with her time that she didn’t see EVEN ONE OF THEM? Then there’s the whole thing about the e-mails and the Clinton Foundation. I’m probably leaving some other highest level questions out, but these certainly should have been asked.

    Imagine that they had time to discuss Trump’s food fight with Miss Universe but not those far more important issues! Perhaps that’s the real scandal of this debate and not the speculation about how Hillary might have cheated. A couple on this thread have said they don’t think cheating would help Hillary. I’m inclined to agree, unless we’re talking about vote fraud in early voting and on election day.

    Liked by 2 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      It’s ironic, but the UniParty is now in a fight with G_d. They want to get Hillary over the finish line to keep their hold on the White House, but she is literally falling apart. All Trump has to do is get up and speak from his heart. Hillary is unable to do much more than read what is put in front of her.

      Liked by 5 people

    • George says:

      He didn’t ask her anything. I believe the final tally on direct questions was 15 to Trump and only 2 to Hillary. No bias there…

      Like

  10. Diane says:

    This YouTube poster (RustyTV, I’ve never heard of it before) has a YouTube video that appears to show a “bar of light” at the top of Hillary’s podium that is not on Trump’s podium and that light turns off shortly after Hillary leaves the podium to head toward Trump. Then, the video shows repeated visits by “The Cleaner” to Hillary’s podium, as well as a late visit by another taller man, who removes something. That taller man also appeared to remove something from the same area under Lester Holt’s table as the area where one of the videos you have here shows Lester dropping something with his left hand after manipulating something with his right hand behind his neck.

    Liked by 3 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      THIS is the money shot. It’s a frigging lens.

      Liked by 2 people

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        Look at the end. The Cleaner is unable to get the thing, so the younger guy gets it. Watch him walk with it. You can see light from the backdrop screen passing through it or reflecting off of it. It is hard to visualize because it seems like it’s relatively clear over most of its surface. He handles it somewhat gingerly, like it’s glass or breakable.

        There is another explanation (clear plastic receptacle for used kleenex in the trash bin), but it’s the wrong size, IMO.

        Hope some better shots emerge. Maybe an enhanced video.

        Liked by 2 people

    • GREENMIRROR says:

      Definitely was several things there.

      Notepad and box removed by Brady with maybe looking to make sure cleaned up. He nods to Lester when Holt leaves. I noticed Hillary crossing out something on notepad after one of the nose signals shown in other youtubes. Also Brady looked like he was going for the glass of water area when run off by camera.

      Brown shoe guy gets two water glasses and then a third, oral emergency meds? I don’t think she took a drink all evening.

      Like

    • R. Craigen says:

      First time “cleaner” picks up “folder” he pauses to look intently at the floor as if something tiny might have dropped.

      Like

  11. Diane says:

    There is also this video, in which a debate attendee captured Hillary repeatedly making small movements on the top of the podium with the index finger of her right hand. The person who posted the video reported it as an example of a hand tremor, but to me it looks like she is manipulating something, as though she is using a touchpad:

    Liked by 6 people

    • auscitizenmom says:

      I agree. It didn’t look like a tremor to me, her hand isn’t moving, just her fingers.

      Liked by 4 people

      • ladypenquin says:

        Agree. Not a tremor (I’m an RN) – but deliberate movement with her finger. Scrolling? Hillary spent her prep debate time learning how to use the cheating equipment.

        Liked by 5 people

        • auscitizenmom says:

          Yep. That’s what I think. Next time, Trumps’ people need to be all over that podium. If they can’t touch it, they can hover………..alllllll around it.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Coldeadhands says:

            Remember when the US built a new embassy in Moscow (during Reagan’s tenure?)and the place was teeming with listening devices that Soviets had built into the structure? That witch learned well from her leftist tutors; all that hoopla over a specially built podium to complement her height… They were wiring it for telemetry.

            Liked by 4 people

          • Boudica says:

            But how would she read it? She was looking at him.

            Like

            • ladypenquin says:

              Hillary looked down often during the debate and had the appearance of reading something. She only looked up at Trump when he spoke. I think she was reading quite a bit that night.

              Like

            • Joan says:

              Look at the video and you will see she never loos at Trump when she is talking but is always looking down at the podium ….

              Like

          • Kintbury says:

            I personally think that Preibus should go on all of the networks with this and say no more debates. If we have a townhall, she always uses plants and they end up being discovered to be Democrat operatives. We can see that Lester Holt removed an something at the end of the debate and he is not supposed to be wired. They were all involved in it. I expect they rushed to her podium to get the questions she had ahead of time.

            Liked by 1 person

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Interesting. It’s bad either way. It’s either Parkinson’s, or a motion designed to be picked up by a camera to scroll something, like (my current theory) a projector to the light-box.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Looks involuntary to me, like a rhythmic spasm

        Like

        • ladypenquin says:

          It would be more than one finger if it was spasm. The fingers actually have nerves affecting the last 2 digits, 1st 3 digits and so on. Even if one finger cramps, adjacent fingers have trouble acting normally. Think about a toe cramp.

          She is using her index finger in a controlled manner; the one people used for “intentional” movement.

          Like

    • justfactsplz says:

      It looks to like she is manipulating a button to make the contraption scroll down for her.

      Liked by 1 person

    • TheLastDemocrat says:

      But she is not looking at the podium while doing this hand movement – she is looking at the next president of the US. You cannot scroll while not looking.

      Liked by 1 person

      • i'm just sayin'.. says:

        It could be a mechanism to keep her calm

        Liked by 1 person

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        I noticed that, too. The only way this would work for an interactive scroll would be that it’s going straight to her contacts, like an advanced version of Google Glass for the display, and a hand-motion monitor for the “mouse”. Don’t think so, personally. That would be rough, even for a young trainee who learns fast. She needs simple and old-school. I think it’s an involuntary finger motion being suppressed.

        Like

      • ladypenquin says:

        That’s exactly when she’d be doing the scrolling, when she is looking at something else and not down. She had an ability to read with downward glances, knowing questions in advance could have easily given her timing of, “ok, now onto the next answer.”

        Look, some of these details may seem like nothing, but putting them together paints the correct picture. There was secretive and furtive behavior by her staff on that stage after the debate, and it all was surrounding that podium. Lester Holt had no business going up there BEHIND to make any eye contact… when all he should have been involved with chatting up the VIPS with whom he had just moderated a debate.

        Bill Clinton was involved, nods here and there, and glances among the participants in the scam. Any law enforcement officer would tell you this is suspicious behavior, going back again and again to remove what? Nothing should have been in there… Then the “didn’t get it all word” then the “all clear.”

        Like

    • Kat says:

      When I made it full-screen it looked like her finger was on top of a pen or pen-like device. My husband has a neurological disorder and sometimes has arm and hand tremors relating to that. The twitchy movements he has don’t look quite the same – these seem to be more controlled. It would help to know if this was in real-time at all or if the video was fully slowed down. It’s hard to tell how natural-like a tremor really is if you can’t see it in real time.

      One other thing I noticed, and again it’s harder to tell for sure if I’m seeing what I think I’m seeing because I’m unsure about the speed of this recording, look at the arm closest to us (the audience) around the 45-50 second mark. The very subtle, almost rhythmic flutter right around the elbow there do seem very similar to the types of muscle twitches my husband suffers from. He often tightens the muscle to try and stop the twitches, which with her elbow flexed would also be similar.

      Maybe it’s all wrong, but interesting regardless!

      Liked by 2 people

    • nobaddog says:

      Theres to much going on and she needs to really think about whats shes doing. Maybe a teleprompter, notes or microphone but she cant do all these things. If she knows the questions and i believe she did, that really helped her look better than she should have.

      Like

  12. Only other thought is maybe it was a list of pre-fed questions from Holt matched with her talking points.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. auscitizenmom says:

    Lou Dobbs mentioned the cleaner tonight and showed the video near the end of his broadcast. (I tried to find a clip, but it is too early).

    Liked by 2 people

  14. vexedmi says:

    Hmm …….The Cleaner said he was in California and Hillary’s sometime double said that maybe she was or wasn’t in California. The plot thickens.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Pat64 says:

    Watching other videos after the debate, a handler comes out right away and removes her water glass and what looks like a water bottle!!! why???? No ones is rushing to get DJT’s water glass, what’s in it that has to have someone retrieve it ASAP! ..also maybe the light is to block out any flashing lights ( seizure precautions)

    Like

  16. H.V says:

    Freaking weirdo how she opens her mouth so wide

    Liked by 2 people

  17. GREENMIRROR says:

    This morning she had microphone in hand during rally.

    Studying some reasons why she does not use wired or multiple microphones…led me to RFI/EMI transmissions looking for antenna and that mic cables can make good antennas. Maybe this little info can trigger some thoughts.

    This explanation provides the general concept.

    Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) in a sound system can be defined as an unwanted audible signal that invades the sound system via a radio frequency (RF) signal. Typical sources of RF signals: FM radio station, AM radio station, walkie-talkie, cell phone, Blackberry PDA. If the RFI is audible, it can take many forms: buzz, noise bursts, speech, or music. The common element is that these sounds are not desired in the sound system.

    A modulated RF signal (i.e., carrying information like an audio signal or digital data) travels through the “air” looking for a receiving antenna. Any piece of metal that has the appropriate length can be an antenna: a piece of wire, a metal beam, a sheet of aluminum foil, a trace on a printed circuit board, or a nail. Most of the time these metal items are not connected to a circuit that can “detect” the radio signal. Detection means converting the signal from RF into audio. A detector can be very simple: a diode, a transistor, an integrated circuit, even a slightly imperfect (“cold”) solder joint, all are potential detectors.

    Let’s look at a microphone and its cable as seen by an RF signal. The microphone cable has a long length of metal, called the “cable shield”, just under the outer plastic jacket. The cable shield protects the cable’s inner conductors from outside interference (such as electrostatic buzz/hum) and also is part of the phantom power circuit for condenser microphones. However, the RF signal sees the cable shield as an antenna. One end of the cable shield goes to the microphone; and if the microphone is a condenser, the cable shield eventually connects to the printed circuit board inside of the microphone. The other end of the cable shield goes to the microphone mixer or to a wireless transmitter; both have a printed circuit board. These boards are covered with diodes, transistors, integrated circuits and many, many solder joints…and all can be detectors. So the cable shield intercepts the RF signal, carries the RF signal to a printed circuit board where the signal is detected, transformed into an audio signal, and heard in the audio system as unwanted noise.

    There are multiple reasons why RFI is not always a problem. The microphone may have a dynamic element and thus no printed circuit board. The mixer might handle the cable shield in a way that sheds the RF signal before it can reach the mixer’s circuit board. The RF signal might be so weak that the detected audio signal is too quiet to hear, though moving closer to the interfering RF signal transmitter will increase the RF signal level and the RFI could become audible.

    A cell phone or Blackberry PDA is an RF transmitter – – a local source of RFI that can be extremely strong. Audible RFI is quite likely when an active cell phone or Blackberry PDA is located close to a microphone or its cable.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hindsight2020 says:

      With wired mics, rf is a rare problem. However, a wireless system can be susceptible up all sorts of interference. If you are trying to minimize interference, the wireless mic is NOT your best option.

      Like

  18. Dean says:

    This photo of Sanders & Hillary debate when Sanders accuses Hillary of cheating and Mr . Cleaner is working that debate also…

    Like

  19. Dean says:

    Photo of the Cleaner at work during Sanders & Clinton debate…

    Like

  20. Co Gal says:

    Congrats Sundance. Yesterday I googled “The Cleaner” and came up with a cleaning product and a movie. Today first up comes your article!

    Liked by 1 person

  21. GREENMIRROR says:

    So wandering through pacemakers and internal defibrillators and their interference with EMI/RFI I found this…

    http://www.neurologyadvisor.com/movement-disorders/brio-neurostimulation-system-parkinsons-disease-essential-tremor/article/420770/

    hmmm.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. LKA in LA says:

    As I tune into tonight’s Sundance cliff notes I find myself thinking “wth.” The lengths these corrupt people are covering and propping her up are really scary. I am truely amazed they are getting away with it. They really are getting away with massive fraud on so many levels thanks to the commie media. Cold anger here. I hope the next debate someone from Trump team will film from behind. Catch her. Stop debate in mid sentence and call her out on live air.

    Like

  23. @XYennial says:

    Great article! well put together. I agree, often times loony over the top conspiracy junkies undermine actual relevant non-partisan issues with these canadaites that rational people should be paying attention too but often dismiss. I think you are onto something please keep digging.
    A Comment on your observation of “single wireless mic” – Its is a safety protocol, she has been under secret service safety protocols for most of her middle-aged life. That single wireless mic comes straight out of Secret Services pocket and onto the podium or if provided by venue it is taken and scanned and wiped down. You will be hard pressed to ever find anyone under secret service detail jump in front of a bank of unchecked outside microphones, especially wired ones. Too easy for an outside threat to plant one laced with anthrax, rigged with a 12 gauge shotgun shell or wired to a higher powered detonator. You can see the correlation of the wireless mic in the public Q&A setting because of the SS lack of full control over the venue setup and situation, nothing really more. If it were wired it would only be one as well and SS would have all connections traced and tested before candidate put their head in front of it.
    In a prepared speech the SS have been involved in the entire venue setup and know where the Mic wires trace. The wired mic is more reliable and the two mic setup is better for delivering speeches so the candidate can pivot their head and eye contact around the room and not have any volume lose or fluctuation. Fielding questions and responding is a more linear dialogue and one microphone is fine for that. As far as her holding it, that’s just speaker preference probably makes her feel less nervous and her handlers likely think it gives her uptight ass a small resemblances of appearing laid back. Twitter me: @XYennial

    Like

    • genxyennial says:

      And remember there is nothing this women does that is not scripted! If she ALWAYS uses and holds a single wireless mic when responding in public settings you can be assured she and her handlers have spent a fortune of donor and tax payer money on focus groups that have concluded they find it more appealing when she holds that single wireless mic. Nothing is unscripted with her… Nothing…

      Like

  24. Notice when Trump gives her a pat on the back, pulls hand away, then rubs her back a bit lower. Did he feel something in the pat, and did the rub to confirm? Look at his facial expression.. as if he felt something? He was sidetracked enough to momentarily forget to shake the moderators hand. He felt something. There’s a video of Trump leaving the debate.. where he looks pissed.. like he knew.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Mrs.Pie says:

    Preibus and/or Conway should be the last peopl on the and off the stage before the candidates next time. Inspect both podiums and compare beforehand.

    Like

  26. Natasha says:

    This guy is like “Uncle Pete” from the TV Show “Damages.”
    He’s the clean up guy… Dirty dirty… The look on his face told you he was up to something dirty.

    Like

  27. Do away with podiums have them sit in wooden see through chairs or stools so that all of their body reactions can be seen by everyone..They can have lapel microphones . Same with the person who is asking the questions he or she knows what he or she is going to ask so no need to have any papers.

    Like

  28. kathy says:

    She is a scumbag. Trump should back out of upcoming debates UNLESS 1) someone from his team along with someone from the election committee check her podium for electronic devices right before they go on stage; 2) she is checked for an earpiece and 3) moderators are checked for electronic devices.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s