Professional Political “Gaslighting”…

To understand or remind yourself of the concept, first watch the video:

Then consider:

ted cruz 1It was CNN who said that Ben Carson was exiting the race, not us.  You must be mistaken.

I didn’t know I was a Canadian citizen all of my adult life.  I never supported Trade Promotion Authority, I’ve always been against it. You must be mistaken.

I’ve never supported taking away ethanol subsidies.  You are mistaken.   I never voted for the Corker/Cardin amendment, I am against the Iran deal – you must be mistaken.  I’ve never take money from Washington DC lobbyists, nor do I want it – you must be mistaken.  I didn’t want 500,000 more H1B  immigrant work visa’s, you are mistaken.

I never said ‘birthright citizenship’ was guaranteed in the constitution.  I’ve never supported amnesty, or legal status, or a pathway to citizenship for illegal aliens, you must be misremembering.  We didn’t fail to disclose anything on our Federal Election Commission filings, you’re just remembering wrong again…..

sheeple crop

#CruzCrew

 

This entry was posted in Christian Values, Election 2016, Ted Cruz, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

465 Responses to Professional Political “Gaslighting”…

  1. kallibella says:

    I never was in Ted’s camp. I always had my suspicions about him. And especially now after he so connivingly play that dirty trick on Carson, the little respect I may have had for him is all gone.
    Trump has to fight hard to expose fake Ted AND Rubito, who is currently the GOPe favorite to knock Trump out of the race.
    Well, no surprise. This election is so important to vulgarians that it is literally We the People against THEM!

    Liked by 9 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      I will not gaslight you and say I was never gaslit by Cruz. I was.

      Gaslighting is viral, and gains credibility by the reputation and mental machinery of those who were gaslit. Cruz is gaslighting personified. He has gaslit tens of millions of honest conservatives.

      Cruz is yet another borderline American, lifted up to gain control and take down America. Between leveraged Canadian Cruz and Bubble Bath Rubio (also ineligible), the globalist controllers want to take charge of America via people who are fatally flawed in a political sense, and totally dependent upon their silence to stay in the power track. Trump really does scare them.

      These people want the very idea of America to go away.

      “You were never an American. You were always a citizen of the world, just like us.”

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Travis McGee says:

    Gaslighting=lying. A trait commonly found in professional politicians to fool the electorate because they know they will never be held to account for it.

    Liked by 7 people

  3. Lulu says:

    Gaslighting is playing with another’s mind. Telling them that they “misremembered”. That they didn’t hear what they heard, or they misunderstood what they heard, didn’t see what they saw, didn’t experience what they knew – or thought they knew – they had experienced.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Adam Rush says:

      I had a girl who did this to me telling me she never liked me…we never had anything…after trying to snuggle with me…hold my hand….all so she could go back to her ex! Funny thing is she said you didn’t talk to me in weeks. Oh so you did like me….lol. Women commonly use gaslighting to just plain out lie to guys and that my friends is the state of the country, a country that is mentally ill and sick! And yes I am included that too…..we have a serious problem and most of the fault lies in Washington DC.

      Like

    • mo says:

      That sounds like what Charles Boyer did to Ingrid Bergman in the movie “Gaslight”.

      Like

  4. $20 Trillion in short term real debt.

    $200 Trillion in long term welfare never to be done debt on that fraud.

    Democrats and Republicans voting for omnibus funding bills.

    Not enough gas to gaslight these lies, in fact the deflation of the money will happen real time in view, the rest of the fall will be loud crashing sounds.

    They can not lie out of it now, they can stall the knowing, have some look away from the real , but they can not stop that which is real.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Take the Bush family buying up the land over the huge underground water supply in Uruguay.

    They know, and they build places to hide.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Gail Combs says:

    Keep an eye on the pea under the shell folks:

    The PUPPET MASTER STRATEGY PART I
    If Trump is a very popular candidate, how are the elite going to get the candidate THEY want and not the candidate we choose?

    It is very simple. Field a lot of candidates use divide and conquer to make sure no one get 50% or more of the delegates and go for a brokered convention where the GOPe can harass and threaten the delegates into supporting the candidate THEY have already chosen.

    N.H. Republican Power Broker Says NO Trump, NO Cruz – Promises Brokered Convention That would indicate they want Jeb Bush or maybe Rubio.

    WIKI has a simple sxplanation of a Brokered Convention.
    “….If no candidate has a majority of the delegates’ votes, the convention is then considered brokered; thereafter, the nomination is decided through a process of alternating political horse-trading, and additional re-votes. In this circumstance, all regular delegates (who, previously, may have been pledged to a particular candidate according to rules which vary from state to state) are “released,” and are able to switch their allegiance to a different candidate before the next round of balloting…..”

    Here it is spelled out by the GOPe
    “In 2014, the RNC approved selection rules that govern how each state’s delegates are portioned out from the primaries. Under one of the changes, states holding their primaries between March 1 and March 14 will have their delegates doled out proportionately with election results, a change that will likely stymie a movement candidate.

    States that have primaries on or after March 15 will be winner-take-all states.

    That’s important because another RNC rule change requires that a candidate must win a majority of delegates in eight or more states before his or her name may be presented for nomination at the 2016 Republican National Convention.

    With 18 GOP presidential candidates, for now, it will be that much harder for any candidate to win a majority in any state, let alone eight…”. (Article July 2015)

    Liked by 6 people

  7. TwoLaine says:

    I learned the hard way, teenagers are VERY GOOD at this.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Gail Combs says:

    Keep an eye on the pea under the shell folks:

    The PUPPET MASTER STRATEGY PART I
    If Trump is a very popular candidate, how are the elite going to get the candidate THEY want and not the candidate we choose?

    It is very simple. Field a lot of candidates use divide and conquer to make sure no one get 50% or more of the delegates and go for a brokered convention where the GOPe can harass and threaten the delegates into supporting the candidate THEY have already chosen.

    N.H. Republican Power Broker Says NO Trump, NO Cruz – Promises Brokered Convention That would indicate they want Jeb Bush or maybe Rubio.
    Here the game plan it is spelled out by the GOPe
    (Article July 2015)

    Liked by 2 people

  9. wodiej says:

    Love Bill Whittle. Thanks for the post and the real truth about Cruz.

    Liked by 1 person

    • chiavarm says:

      I guess you did not see Bill’s latest afterburner, where he talks candidly about trump and implies support for Cruz.

      Liked by 1 person

      • gainny says:

        Feh. No, worse than feh. So Trump supprters are fawning worshippers. No, no division there, just friendly name calling. Kumbaya, y’all.

        Those “mystic chords [cords?] of memory” will shortly be extinct if we don’t control the immigration of people with alien, adversarial memories.

        This election is our last stand against globalism. Nothing is more importand than nation-destroying immigration and sovereignty-destroying trade treaties.

        Trump not conservative enough, Bill? Tell it to Phyllis Schlafly and Jeff Sessions.

        So who are you supporting, Bill? Any of them will do against the dreaded Hillary? They’re all good, eh?

        Thanks for the concern trolling, pal.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gevoy says:

        Thank you for bringing this up. I am greatly disappointed with Bill’s adoration for Cruz and admonishments of Trump. Evidently, he doesn’t realize the he, too, has succumbed to these same tactics.

        Like

        • chiavarm says:

          My position is Trump/Cruz or bust. I will take either and in that vane, the two candidates and their supports better come to the realization that to defeat democrats will eventually need to coalesce behind one.

          Liked by 1 person

      • andi lee says:

        Chia, your comprehension of the english language is sorely lacking. Bill Whittle said no such thing as to supporting Ted Cruz, nor did he imply it.

        In fact, quite the opposite, Bill Whittle will support Trump provisionally, providing Trump’s “impeachable promises” to support and defend the Constitution of America.

        Those are my concerns as well.

        Like

  10. Gail Combs says:

    A case can be made that Ted Cruz is not eligible to run. This gives the GOPe the ability to grab his delegates and hand them to someone else.
    CRUZ ELIGIBILITY:

    Ted Cruz’s Mother Was On Official List Of Canadian Citizens Eligible To Vote [and so was his father]

    Sen. Ted Cruz’s birth certificate shows he was born in Calgary Canada in 1970. At that time Canada DID NOT have dual citizenship.
    Canada and Dual Citizenship
    “…Prior to 1947 and the introduction of the first Citizenship Act, there was legally no such thing as Canadian citizenship. Both native-born and naturalized citizens were British subjects. In 1977, the current Citizenship Act came into force, making extensive changes to the law. … The Act also provided that Canadians could hold dual citizenship, reversing the previous situation in which citizenship was lost upon the acquisition of the citizenship of another country.…”<?b>
    http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp445-e.htm

    From WIKI since the US government pulled their page on Dual Citizenship that I have referred to earlier
    “…Although the U.S. government does not endorse dual citizenship as a matter of policy, it recognizes the existence of dual citizenship and completely tolerates the maintenance of multiple citizenship by U.S. citizens…. [29] A U.S. citizen may lose his or her dual citizenship by obtaining naturalization in a foreign state

    One circumstance where dual citizenship may run counter to expectations of government agencies is in matters of security clearance….”
    [29] “US State Department Services Dual Nationality.: travel(DOT)state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.htm

    Sen. Ted Cruz only gave up his Canadian dual citizenship on May 14, 2014 roughly 9 months after he learned he wasn’t only an American.

    Ted Cruz, like Obummer has sealed his records.
    There are some other nasties such as
    Interviewer: “What is your understanding of how one becomes a natural born Citizen?”

    Cruz: “Two citizen parents and born on the soil.” ”

    And Cruz writing the forward for the book
    “US Constitution For Dummies” The book reveals Cruz not eligible as natural born citizen per the US Supreme Court case United States vs Wong Kim Ark 1898,

    Actual wording at (wwwDOT)law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649
    ….Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.

    Liked by 2 people

  11. Gail Combs says:

    From WIKI since the US government pulled their page on Dual Citizenship that I have referred to earlier
    “…Although the U.S. government does not endorse dual citizenship as a matter of policy, it recognizes the existence of dual citizenship and completely tolerates the maintenance of multiple citizenship by U.S. citizens…. [29] A U.S. citizen may lose his or her dual citizenship by obtaining naturalization in a foreign state

    One circumstance where dual citizenship may run counter to expectations of government agencies is in matters of security clearance….”
    [29] “US State Department Services Dual Nationality.: travel(DOT)state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.htm

    Sen. Ted Cruz only gave up his Canadian dual citizenship on May 14, 2014 roughly 9 months after he learned he wasn’t only an American.

    Ted Cruz, like Obummer has sealed his records.

    Like

    • Gail Combs says:

      I really hate WordUnimpressed. This is the first part of that.

      A case can be made that Ted Cruz is not eligible to run. This gives the GOPe the ability to grab his delegates and hand them to someone else.
      CRUZ ELIGIBILITY: part i

      Ted Cruz’s Mother Was On Official List Of Canadian Citizens Eligible To Vote [and so was his father]

      Sen. Ted Cruz’s birth certificate shows he was born in Calgary Canada in 1970. At that time Canada DID NOT have dual citizenship.
      Canada and Dual Citizenship
      “…Prior to 1947 and the introduction of the first Citizenship Act, there was legally no such thing as Canadian citizenship. Both native-born and naturalized citizens were British subjects. In 1977, the current Citizenship Act came into force, making extensive changes to the law. … The Act also provided that Canadians could hold dual citizenship, reversing the previous situation in which citizenship was lost upon the acquisition of the citizenship of another country.…”<?b>
      http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp445-e.htm

      Like

  12. That video is going up on my Face Book page for sure. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Bull Durham says:

    The most important part of the video is at 4:36. The Definition and Description of Sociopath.
    Ted Cruz is a classic Sociopath. And the fact that true believers have to suspend their disbelief, reverse their gut reaction, contrive an excuse, project on others Cruz’s guilt and refuse to accept the facts are merely the process that results from the Sociopathic Event(s).

    Even the victims (Carson, the other candidates, the American people, Iowans) cannot accept the truth. This is the dynamic of the process that sociopathy produces.

    America was duped at Peal Harbor, Dallas, 9-11, (I’m skipping the fairy tales of Malcolm X, MLK, Jr, Bobby Kennedy, Andrew Breitbart, and others), and now right in the wide open spaces of Iowa we saw it and there is written, time-stamped proof of Fraud and Theft and Conspiracy and Cover-up.

    Add the name Steven King to the deception. Last night on Rachel Maddow, she had the proof with King’s tweets, early on. The Cruz campaign began the plot before 4pm. The CNN time stamp is 6:42. There is mammoth evidence of the plot, the execution and the conspiracy.

    Should take a boy scout fifteen minutes to assemble it all for a grand jury and indict.

    This one cannot be covered up.

    And beware,America. Cruz has been uncovered. The criminal and diseased mind and corrupt character is out in the open. Another Fraud is running for the President and he had huge amounts of money and powerful Puppetmasters with him.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. KBR says:

    Remember Rush called Rubio a “full throated” conservative?

    Psalms 5:8-9
    Lead me, O Lord, in thy righteousness because of mine enemies; make thy way straight before my face.
    For there is no faithfulness in their mouth; their inward part is very wickedness;
    THEIR THROAT IS AN OPEN SEPULCHRE; they flatter with their tongue.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. Gail Combs says:

    VERY IMPORTANT—
    CRUZ ELIGIBILITY: part ii

    Ted Cruz’s Mother Was On Official List Of Canadian Citizens Eligible To Vote [and so was his father] in 1974
    talkingpointsmemo(DOT)com/muckraker/ted-cruz-mother-canadian-voter-list

    NOTE THAT DATE. 1974 is BEFORE 1977 when Canada did not allow DUAL CITIZENSHIP!
    Canada and Dual Citizenship
    “…Prior to 1947 and the introduction of the first Citizenship Act, there was legally no such thing as Canadian citizenship. Both native-born and naturalized citizens were British subjects. In 1977, the current Citizenship Act came into force, making extensive changes to the law. … The Act also provided that Canadians could hold dual citizenship, reversing the previous situation in which citizenship was lost upon the acquisition of the citizenship of another country.…”
    http://publications.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp445-e.htm

    Liked by 1 person

    • WeeWeed says:

      ONCE! We DO eventually dig things out of moderation! 6 times is ridiculous.

      Liked by 6 people

      • Gail Combs says:

        Sorry,
        I am new here and have had major problems with Word press completely disappearing posts. Forget trying to post a link to John Kehr’s website. Jo Nova, Steven Goddard and E.M. Smith have all told me the posts never made it into moderation or even into the spam bucket. Others at E.M. Smiths and Steve Goddards also found the links cause the post to be completely disappeared.

        The word T r o t s k y also gets posts disappeared.

        This started about a year ago.

        Liked by 3 people

        • amwick says:

          I had a problem with Jesse Jackson…. I mean writing in a post, I do not know the gentleman personally. So yes, wordpress happens…. 🙂 As to this thread, I love when I learn a new word or phrase. Gaslighting is a doozy!!!

          Liked by 1 person

    • Jack Long says:

      It was on the books but never fully enforced.

      The law addressed, specifically, Canadian citizens who naturalized in another country, to begin with.

      Loss of Canadian citizenship generally occurred in the following cases:
      naturalization outside Canada

      Acquisition and loss of citizenship under the Act”>History of Canadian nationality law – Acquisition and loss of citizenship under the Act

      Please look carefully at the last paragraph in the section linked to. I have the key sentences in bold:

      Although Canada restricted dual citizenship between 1947 and 1977, there were some situations where Canadians could nevertheless legally possess another citizenship. For example, migrants becoming Canadian citizens were not asked to formally prove that they had ceased to hold the nationality of their former country. Similarly children born in Canada to non-Canadian parents were not under any obligation to renounce a foreign citizenship they had acquired by descent. Holding a foreign passport did not in itself cause loss of Canadian citizenship.

      The only way Ted Cruz could be not a US citizen, as I see it, is if mother Cruz voluntarily renounced her US citizenship before Dec. 1970. That is, simply, of her own free will.

      Mother Cruz did not have to renounce her US citizenship in order to receive a Canadian passport, nor did she have to give up her US passport when she became a Canadian citizen.

      Like

      • Jett Black says:

        The fact that Mama Cruz may or may not have retained U.S. citizenship in 1974 does not depend entirely on Canadian law. Evidencing the intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship by registering to vote in Canada may have been enough to cut off her U.S. citizenship, though no action was likely taken to document that fact. However, none of that Rafael Edward being considered a NBC, because even giving the benefit of he doubt to Mama Cruz, that’s only one parent and not on U.S. soil. Cruz is, at best, a statutorily naturalized citizen, not a constitutional natural born USA citizen. He, awesome constitutional scholar that he is, knew this a long time ago; he’s only taking advantage of the public’s ignorance and the sad degeneration of the rule of law that has been the overwhelming hallmark of <0bummer’s ersatz presidency. Rubio, too–he’s nothing but an anchor baby, not a natural born U.S.A citizen.

        Liked by 1 person

        • gainny says:

          My guess is his mother never did the paperwork to register him at the U.S. Consulate. He keeps his records sealed because he can’t produce that one.

          Incidentally, I left a comment above on our fine conservative friend Bill Whittle. Evidently, it is no longer conservative to care about the citizenship status of presidential candidates.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Jett Black says:

            Agreed. When the rule of law becomes, “Laws for thee, but not for me” there is no rule of law. Anarchy and tyranny naturally ensue. We should all boost our precious metal (lead, brass, and steel) investments.

            Like

    • Michael Wassil says:

      Don’t get too attached to this argument. Cruz is not natural born because his father was not a US citizen and he was not born on US territory. End of story. Natural born = both parents citizens of the country of birth at the time of birth. That’s all there is to it.

      A natural born citizen is a citizen of the country of birth forever. No one can renounce it and no one can revoke it. Simply because ‘natural born’ is a description of the circumstances of birth, not status conferred by statute. It precedes all statutory laws. ALL other forms of citizenship are by statute and can be renounced and/or revoked. This is the unique feature of ‘natural born’.

      This is not rocket science. Until Obama openly flouted his ‘non-natural born’ citizenship by conflated ‘native born’ with ‘natural born’, it hardly warranted a second thought. It’s a sorry commentary on the state of education that anyone even attempts to argue that Cruz and Rubio (and Obama) are natural born and that anyone takes them serioulsy.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. blaze says:

    I just want to make a statement. SUNDANCE has abandoned “TRUE” Americans in Burns, Oregon while YOU Treepers drop the ball along with Sundance. This has to be the saddest week of my life and NO ONE has a F’ing CLUE what is now taking place in Burns!!! Americans have abandoned patriots!! I can’t believe this is taking place!!

    Like

    • blaze says:

      ITS NOT about Trump and Cruz Sundance its OREGON right !!

      Like

      • Notmeagain says:

        We’re sad too, but it isn’t just Oregon, it’s Nevada-Montana-Arizona-Wyoming-New Mexico, it’s all over because the fish rots from the head. The battle that has to be won first before there will be justice for anyone ripped off by the Feds is that the head has to be cut off. Oregon isn’t going to be forgotten, it’s a skirmish that can’t be won right now.

        Liked by 2 people

      • lineabirgit says:

        maybe there should be a new Burns-Oregon thread? there is an existing thread but maybe it’s too far down on the page now. maybe the monitors (whatever they’re called) should create a new thread every couple days for those people who are passionate about it. i don’t know anything about it but i can see that there are people who are and who need a place to thrash this out. (smile)

        Liked by 1 person

    • benY says:

      I don’t believe anyone has dropped anything.. This going on all over and the only way to stop it is TRUMP 2016! A band aid will not stop it, it requires major surgery.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jett Black says:

      Your statement is wrong and your hysteria is unwarranted. What has happened in Burns is very unfortunate, but it is a distraction and probably one manufactured by the regime. Chalk it up, for now, to poor strategy and stay tuned for more info when real info becomes available. You can also look at Sipsey Street Irregulars for excellent, knowledgeable info on that situation from the 3% community. As said above, the rotten head needs to be replaced, before significant headway can be made in reforming federal land management (aka, extortion and theft).

      Liked by 3 people

  17. Gail Combs says:

    VERY IMPORTANT—
    CRUZ ELIGIBILITY: part ii

    Ted Cruz’s Mother Was On Official List Of Canadian Citizens Eligible To Vote [and so was his father] in 1974

    NOTE THAT DATE, 1974 is BEFORE 1977 when Canada did not allow DUAL CITIZENSHIP!
    Canada and Dual Citizenship

    QUOTE
    …Prior to 1947 and the introduction of the first Citizenship Act, there was legally no such thing as Canadian citizenship. Both native-born and naturalized citizens were British subjects. In 1977, the current Citizenship Act came into force, making extensive changes to the law. … The Act also provided that Canadians could hold dual citizenship, reversing the previous situation in which citizenship was lost upon the acquisition of the citizenship of another country…
    .UNQUOTE

    (I can not post with links)

    Like

    • Gail Combs says:

      There are some other nasties such as
      Interviewer: “What is your understanding of how one becomes a natural born Citizen?”

      Cruz: “Two citizen parents and born on the soil.”

      And Cruz writing the forward for the book
      “US Constitution For Dummies” Ironically the book reveals Cruz is not eligible as natural born citizen per the US Supreme Court case United States vs Wong Kim Ark 1898,

      The Actual wording at (wwwDOT)law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649
      QUOTE
      ….Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States….
      UNQUOTE

      Like

    • Lulu says:

      If you post the full url it should become a link.

      Like

      • stella says:

        A URL has to be on it’s own line with a blank line before and after.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Gail Combs says:

        I am intentionally not putting in the full url. Generally you get two live links with wordpress. SInce I use a lot of links to back up what I say**, I gave up waiting for mods to fish them out.

        **When I was at WUWT several years ago trying to wake people up to the globalist plans and Agenda 21, I had a guy who was always calling me crazy. To counter his attacks I changed to carefully documenting every point I make. The mods would leave his attack up for hours before fishing out my rebutal with live links thus leaving the impression in the causal reader that I couldn’t back up what I was saying. So I made the second change to not using live links.

        Like

  18. Gail Combs says:

    The other set of facts to point out is we are being told who to vote for by a bunch of foreigners/globalist who have not vested interest in this country. Actually they want to control our laws and twist them to our atvantage.

    #1. Martin Sorrell, a British citizen and head of WPP, the single most influential and prominent marketing firm in the world said at the Davos Economic Forum:

    Quote
    “It doesn’t matter who the Republicans put up…Hillary will win.”
    UnQuote

    WPP and its myriad of affiliates, represents up to HALF of all Fox News ad revenue. WPP’s clients include such corporate giants as Ford, Glaxo Smith, IBM, Microsoft, Nestle, Walmart, Unilever, etc. – clients who in turn represent tens of millions of dollars in monthly ad revenue that keep the lights of Fox News
    From : http://dcwhispers.com/is-fox-news-preparing-proverbial-kill-shot-against-trump-campaign/

    Statistics showed in 1990, before WTO was ratified, Foreign ownership of U.S. assets amounted to 33% of U.S. GDP. By 2002, just after Clinton left office this had increased to over 70% of U.S. GDP. source: (wwwDOT)fame.org/HTM/greg%20Pickup%201%2010%2003%20report.htm

    This is a sampling of the media, advertizing and related industries with over 50% foreign ownership, according to Source Watch ( 31 October 2008)

    * Sound recording industries - 97%
    * Motion picture and sound recording industries - 75%
    * Motion picture and video industries - 64%
    * Database, directory, and other publishers - 63%
    * Book publishers - 63%
    * Advertising and related services - 41%
    

    (wwwDOT)sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Foreign_ownership_of_U.S._corporations

    Like

    • Gail Combs says:

      That should read
      The other set of facts to point out is we are being told who to vote for by a bunch of foreigners/globalists who have no vested interest in this country. Actually they want to control our laws and twist them to their advantage.

      If you read The Trans-Pacific Partnership Synopsis FROM THE US GOVERNMENT

      It point blank say the control of the USA is given to foreign corporations.

      The Groniad says this about the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement:
      QUOTE
      Leading arbitration lawyer, George Kahale (chairman of Curtis, Mallet-Provost, Colt & Mosie LLP, an international law firm) says there are critical loopholes in the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s investment chapter that leave Australia wide open:

      ….an MFN clause is tantamount to a classic wipeout move. It would enable foreign corporations from TPP states to make a claim against Australia based on the ISDS provisions in any other trade deal Australia has signed, no matter which country it was signed with. That means it does not matter how carefully the TPP is drafted: foreign investors can cherrypick another treaty Australia has signed, and sue the Australian government based on the provisions included in that treaty…..”
      UNQUOTE
      http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/nov/10/tpps-clauses-that-let-australia-be-sued-are-weapons-of-legal-destruction-says-lawyer

      In the US Government synopsis we find:
      QUOTE
      DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
      The Dispute Settlement chapter is intended to allow Parties to expeditiously address disputes between them over implementation of the TPP. ….TPP Parties aim to have these disputes resolved through impartial, unbiased panels….Panels will consider requests from non-governmental entities [NGOs like Greenpeace] located in the territory of any disputing Party to provide written views regarding the dispute to panels during dispute settlement proceedings.

      Should consultations fail to resolve an issue, Parties may request establishment of a panel, which would be established within 60 days after the date of receipt of a request for consultations or 30 days after the date of receipt of a request related to perishable goods. Panels will be composed of three international trade and subject matter experts independent of the disputing Parties, with procedures available to ensure that a panel can be composed even if a Party fails to appoint a panelist within a set period of time. …

      To maximize compliance, the Dispute Settlement chapter allows for the use of trade retaliation (e.g., suspension of benefits), if a Party found not to have complied with its obligations fails to bring itself into compliance with its obligations. Before use of trade retaliation, a Party found in violation can negotiate or arbitrate a reasonable period of time in which to remedy the breach….
      UNQUOTE

      The WTO agreement on Agriculture, now backed up by the Food Safety Modernization act allows diseased cattle across the US border. That is an example of how this works for foreigners and agains the interests of US citizens..

      Liked by 1 person

  19. LaBonBon says:

    Has anyone read Lame Cherry today? She’s talking about the Trump plane engine problem and claims it was an assassination attempt. Does anyone know if Trump is aware of the few good blogs that support him??? This needs to be looked into. Please read and respond: http://www.lamecherry.blogspot.com/

    Like

  20. Generik Broderick says:

    GaslighTED

    Like

  21. darcy says:

    Pertaining specifically to the subject of gaslighting, I wish to direct your attention to pages 14-15 of Stephen Coughlin’s report titled “Burning Down the House: A Strategic Overview of the Threat, the CVE, and Strategic Incomprehension in the War on Terror.”
    Please note the term above: Strategic Incomprehension.
    The 34-page report is here: http://vladtepesblog.com/wp-content/uploads//2016/02/Strategic-Overview-Coughlin-010216.pdf
    I can’t recommend strongly enough that you take the time to study the report.
    Stephen Coughlin’s web site is: unconstrainedanalytics.org.

    Like

  22. truthandjustice says:

    Great article and yes, so true. Has dual purpose I suspect — not only to further a sinister agenda as they’re doing by making people start believing their lying “version” after repeating them long and often enough (revisionist history, the pro-Islam stuff, etc.), it also DOES tend to make many “lose their minds” which I’m sure the wonderful Marxist/Commie Professors use in college to brainwash the vulnerable kids. I often refer to all these sociopaths and devoted followers “crazy people”. And of course that’s who they want – weak, insecure, uninformed, dependent, drug addicted, unhealthy both physical and mental and spiritual – all easier to eliminate and/or control.

    You can’t reason with them using common sense or facts…..irrational. They’re all in some degree of mental illness, instability, etc. It’s really frightening and the saying “the inmates are running the asylum” is quite true.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Gail Combs says:

      It does make the victim doubt their sanity. I have had it done to me three times and when ‘reality changes’ you are really left wondering what in hades is happening.

      Like

  23. amwick says:

    Gaslighting video reminded me how I lost my nice little individual health insurance plan. I would give $1000 to look POTUS in the eye and tell him just what that means to me personally.

    Like

  24. CrazyWorld says:

    Questions people should ask Ted ; Do you agree with your friend Glenn Beck that’s acceptable to cheat in politics ? Why did you hide some of your records ? Do you have a problem with the lack of transparency with the Obama administration ? Do you as a man of faith believe that it’s ok to gaslight the voters ?

    Like

  25. dj patton says:

    I was saying this month’s ago. Geopolitical gaslighting is what is controlling the masses. Thank you for putting this out.

    Like

  26. Johnny D says:

    CTH used to be the smartest group of true conservatives I knew. But now this page is all Trump thumpers. How can you guys start the day with the Lords Prayer and push for a candidate that truly believes in abortions in the 9th month? Christian? Nope. Trump is a progressive who witnessed what Obama did in 2007. Obama lied through his teeth and then attacked America and got away with it. Trump will commit more crimes against the Constitution than Obama when “elected”. Even the so called “war against Trump” is an illusion. Just another control measure like Gowdy and Fox. My brothers and sisters on this page have fallen asleep in their desperation. Trump disciples act just like Obama supporters of ’07 in every way. That fact alone sends cold chills down the necks of the awakened. Sundance and all the rest please read up….http://annavonreitz.com/. Good day.

    Like

    • Gail Combs says:

      That is a complete and utter LIE. I have Donald Trump’s book from 2000 and he point blanks says he talked to doctors about abortion and decided he was against it.

      SEE top of page 32.

      …I consulted two doctors I respect and upon learning more about this procedure, I have concluded that I would indeed support a ban.”

      I want to say a bit about this issue and about the environment that Trump, his sister and I grew up in. (Ia am a few years younger and was also a teen growing up in the NYC area.)

      Roe v. Wade reached the Supreme court in 1970 (Trump was 24) but the arguments pro and con were going on for several years before that. In the 1960s in NYC there were several cases of ‘coat hanger’ abortions that left women dead so It was a matter of discussion among my Mother Gandma, my aunt and me.

      The clincher for our views was my Grandma and Aunt’s neighbor. She was in her twenties, unmarried, had been raped by a nasty brutal murderer and ended up pregnant. She was not allowed an abortion. She lost her job as the pregnancy became apparent. Some of her friends and family turned on her. Long story short. This nice young woman who I knew commited suicide.

      So there is no black or white with this issue because it changes lives. That is why the Globalists LOVE to use it as a major diversion. We can not allow that to happen this time round.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Johnny D says:

        If I was wrong Ann Coultier would not be making statements that she wouldn’t care if Trump did abortions on the white house steps as long as he wins. This statement was not a book in 2000. Everyone including his sister knows his true views. I know God does too. I will not be counted with the damned.

        Like

        • Gail Combs says:

          So do I believe the words writen by Trump about his soul searching on the issue in 2000 and in his later book or do I believe the crap put out by the MSM who we KNOW LIES.

          Go do what I did. ORDER HIS BOOKS and see what TRUMP says and not what the Spin Meisters say he says!

          Repeating spin without citation is nothing more than trolling.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Notmeagain says:

          Coulter was making a stupid joke!! If you thought she meant he was an abortion supporter you need serious help with social interpretation.

          Like

      • Johnny D says:

        By your time frame Donald was done with killing the unborn by his late 50’s or even 60’s?? He did right that early in life did he? Swell guy y’all got there.

        Like

        • Gail Combs says:

          JohnnyBoy,
          I am in agreement with Ann Coultier.

          WHY?
          Because DEMOCIDE: Death by Government, murdered 6 times more people than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the 20th century.

          **************************************************
          1,883,000 Murdered: Turkey’s Genocidal Purges ( 1900 to 1923)
          61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State (1922 – 1991)
          20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State (1933 – 1945)
          38,000,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill (1947 to present)
          2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State (1975 – 1977)
          1,670,000 Murdered: The Vietnamese War State
          1,585,000 Murdered: Poland’s Ethnic Cleansing
          1,503,000 Murdered: The Pakistani Cutthroat State
          1,072,000 Murdered: Tito’s Slaughterhouse
          1,663,000 Murdered? Orwellian North Korea
          ******************************************************

          The 20th century total of citizens killed by their own government = 262,000,000 people “… tortured or beaten to death, hung, shot, and buried alive, burned or starved to death, stabbed or chopped into pieces, and murdered in all the other ways creative and imaginative human beings can devise, I have never been so happy to conclude a project. I have not found it easy to read time and time again about the horrors innocent people have been forced to suffer. What has kept me at this was the belief, as preliminary research seemed to suggest, that there was a positive solution to all this killing and a clear course of political action and policy to end it. And the results verify this. The problem is Power. The solution is democracy. The course of action is to foster freedom.” – Dr R.J. Rummel

          Liked by 1 person

          • Johnny D says:

            Johnny boy? Lol, yup you went ad hominem on me first which points you out as either a progressive Obama supporter or a progressive Trump supporter. Both do the same first. BTW I agree and liked your post about the international bankers and the deaths they cause. I just don’t believe Trump will stop the next great Culling. How on earth can you and your ilk?

            Like

            • Gail Combs says:

              We have ONE last chance Johnny or we will all be wearing one of those. That chance is Trump warts and all.

              Actually I am pretty sure it is already way too late because Duke Energy is a big supporter of Obama.

              I already posted this before. But a quick summary.

              Duke Energy was formed in 1997 just after the WTO was ratified. It owns most of the mid to east coast power stations.
              Obama and Soros have spent eight years riling up the Blacks and the cops. DHS has Fusion Centers that coordinate the local cops who now have military equipment. DHS and other agencies are now armed to the teeth with Ammo for a twenty year war. In Feb 2008 the USA signed an agreement with Canada that Canadian Military can be used here in the USA in the times of crisis.
              Posse comitatus Act 1878, U.S. federal law that makes it a crime to use the military as a domestic police force in the United States. Is dead.

              All Obama/Duke Energy has to do is pull the plug on the electric grid and we have no elections the USA is dead with its cities burned to the ground. (See the 1977 power outage in NYC) The eltie have already packed up their factories and their wealth and moved out of the USA.

              AND THAT IS WHY I TRUST TRUMP. His wealth is in the building that will be burned down, gutted and vandalized and he knows it.

              “… NERC estimates that nearly a quarter of our coal-fired capacity could be off-line by 2018 and that as many as 677 coal-fired units (258 gigawatts) would need to be temporarily shut down to install EPA-mandated equipment.[ii] These EPA regulations must be implemented within a 3-year window and the mandated equipment takes about 18 months to install. Because EPA’s three year timeline is so tight and the regulations affect so many units, utility companies are not sure that they can meet the standards and ensure reliability of the electricity system at the same time….”

              Liked by 2 people

          • Excellent commentary, Gail. I’m enjoying your posts. You appear to me to be rational, knowledgeable, caring and careful. I particularly appreciate your posting of links to back up your comments!

            Liked by 1 person

          • Johnny D says:

            Gail, it’s my job to play devils advocate til the faithful stand and and at least a little light is shown about the worldly higher game is exposed a bit. I know what we face. A life few can even conceive. Thanks for your diligence. Truly…JD

            Like

        • Gail Combs says:

          And while we are at it look at John Holdren, Obama’s Science Czar, says: Forced abortions and mass sterilization needed to save the planet that is from 1977 and he and the Elite have not budge and inch on the issue that the human herd needs culling.

          “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and the UN Foundation

          And who is President of Turner’s UN Foundation? Former Senator Tim Wirth.

          Below is part of an interview with Tim Wirth who organized the 1988 Senate hearing at which James Hansen addressed global warming. Wirth led the U.S. negotiating team at the Kyoto Summit. These are his words about how he scammed Congres. Notice how PROUD he is of his lying.:
          …Believe it or not, we called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer…

          …. Dukakis was trying to get an edge on various things and was looking for spokespeople, and two or three of us became sort of the flacks out on the stump for Dukakis, making the separation between what Democratic policy and Republican policy ought to be. So it played into the presidential campaign in the summer of ’88 as well….

          So a number of things came together…

          … What we did it was went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right? So that the air conditioning wasn’t working inside the room and so when the, when the hearing occurred there was not only bliss, which is television cameras in double figures, but it was really hot. …

          So Hansen’s giving this testimony, you’ve got these television cameras back there heating up the room, and the air conditioning in the room didn’t appear to work. So it was sort of a perfect collection of events that happened that day, with the wonderful Jim Hansen, who was wiping his brow at the witness table and giving this remarkable testimony. …
          http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/hotpolitics/interviews/wirth.html

          This is the SAME Tim Wirth that said: “We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”

          Liked by 1 person

        • Gail Combs says:

          Let me repeat. ABORTION IS A DIVERSION. We have a heck of a lot more important things to worry about like the Serf collar snapping shut around our necks.

          Do you think you will have any RIGHTS once you are a serf?

          Remember China’s one child policy?

          Well guess what, this is what Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention just said last year in Brussels in October 2015

          “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution… democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China is the best model.

          And as I keep saying the Trans-Pacific Partnership has the TEETH to enforce other treaties and the USA already ratified the UN Framework Convention.

          ENVIRONMENT

          As home to a significant portion of the world’s people, wildlife, plants and marine species, TPP Parties share a strong commitment to protecting and conserving the environment, including by working together to address environmental challenges, such as pollution, illegal wildlife trafficking, illegal logging, illegal fishing, and protection of the marine environment….
          They reaffirm their commitment to implement the multilateral environmental agreements (MEAs) they have joined. The Parties commit to provide transparency in environmental decision-making, implementation and enforcement….. Finally, the Parties commit to cooperate to address matters of joint or common interest, including in the areas of conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and transition to low-emissions and resilient economies.
          Synopsis FROM THE US GOVERNMENT

          This treaty literally strips the USA of sovereignty and allows totalitarian rule by Corporations and bureaucrats with a bit of help from NGOs to add a veneer of ‘democracy.’

          Here is another political savy guy who repeats what the guardian quote said.

          From The Hill by former Bill Clinton advisor Dick Morris
          “The TPP, generally supported by pro-free-trade Republicans but opposed by labor-union Democrats, reportedly contains a barely noticed provision that allows for the free migration of labor among the signatory nations. Patterned after similar provisions in the treaties establishing the European Union, it would override national immigration restrictions in the name of facilitating the free flow of labor.

          The draft treaty, now under discussion among 12 Pacific Rim nations, including the U.S., Canada, Mexico, Vietnam and Japan, makes provision for needed labor to move across national boundaries without restraint. While much of the commentary on the deal has been focused on high-skill, white-collar migration, it could easily be interpreted as allowing farm workers and others to flow back and forth without legal regulation…..

          Curtis Ellis, executive director of the American Jobs Alliance, calls the trade deal “a Trojan horse for Obama’s immigration agenda” on The Hill’s Contributor’s blog. He notes that “one corporate trade association says bluntly that ‘The TPP should remove restrictions on nationality or residency requirements for the selection of personnel.’ ”
          http://thehill.com/opinion/dick-morris/239633-dick-morris-tpp-mass-immigration

          Liked by 2 people

          • Johnny D says:

            I whole heartedly agree Gail. The coming Great Culling. Serfdom. You are aware that there are others who champion American sovereignty don’t you? Don’t you? Again I agree with your anti-collective/anti-international banker posts AND you seem to cut and paste just fine. But why are you connecting Trump at the end like He is the solution when all facts point otherwise? Blind in your desperation this page has become….Blind.

            Like

            • Gail Combs says:

              Who the heck else is there Johnny?

              I went through every single republican that polled over 1%.

              As can be seen Cruz is a complete sleaze with connections to Goldman Sachs and CFR via his wife.

              Rubio is another sleaze with a lot of dicey stuff including a brother-in-law connected to the Drug Cartel.

              Cruz, Rand Paul, Carson & Rubio all support TPP which as I noted above is the end of the USA. Carson has made it clear that he is not a 2nd amendment proponent, wants to make the illegals already here legal. Also he said that he voted for Obama in 2008.

              I originally wanted a Rand Paul/ Carson ticket and then went to a Trump/Cruz ticket but now the only one left standing is Trump.

              Believe me I had pages and pages of notes on the candidates before I ended up here.
              So I can give you links to support my position above.

              If you have a viable candidate that is not FOR the Trans-Pacific Partnership, illegal aliens getting a free pass and AGAINST the 2nd Amnendment as written (most are squidgee) tell me who the heck it is because I can’t find him.

              Like

              • I am really sad that the America-haters you have cited, Gail, are for the TPP and against American sovereignty. Real free trade and free movement of labor is what enabled the huge wealth created in the UNITED States of America.
                However, the U.S. Constitution protected ALL of the other Rights of the individual States, thus giving us the best of both worlds – the world of small (nation) states and the world of a huge (nation) empire.
                When jobs disappeared in Oregon due to Clinton and the Enviros, loggers went to Washington and Alaska. When oil workers couldn’t find work in Texas, they went to North Dakota. But the only way we can retain our individual freedom is through the Constitution and rule of law.
                THIS is what the UN, CFR and other bad guys want to destroy. Keep on truckin’ Gail, et al! You are doing a good job of helping SD educate the world.

                Liked by 2 people

            • Jett Black says:

              Name the candidate, other than Trump, who will champion USA sovereignty. If you’re going to say Cruz, don’t waste your time. You’ll have to try again with someone eligible and who didn’t vote for or fail to vote against TPA and TPP.

              Liked by 1 person

              • Johnny D says:

                hope your right Jett…i really do. I love my country. I’ve just seen the light. Hell we are still working for the Crown…but Trump rock on! At least it will tear the GOPe a new one.

                Like

    • Jett Black says:

      Abortion is not a federal issue–a person’s medical care is a personal, private issue of individual rights. To the extent that regulation is appropriate, it is a power reserved to the states, as the U.S. Constitution does not confer that power to the feds. In short, this is not a POTUS issue.
      You’re wrong about Trump’s views. You’re using dated and/or opposition information, rather than Trump’s own published and oft-repeated statements. Trump has also said that he would seek to remove all funding for Planned Parenthood’s abortion operations–a good and workable first step (I think all federal funding for medical treatment of any kind should be stopped, as it is unconstitutional), though one that congress, not POTUS, would have to initiate.
      Every other candidate is at least as bad and/or those who take a position involving federal intervention in individual contraception/abortion or any personal medical decision are, despite having the moral high-ground, more dangerous and evil because they are denigrating the Constitution (see 1 above).
      You mad!

      Like

  27. Linda Ruth says:

    In regard to fobdangerclose’s reference to the Bush family. It’s “the family that preys together” WITH the Clintons. Their intention is to keep their clans reigning in the USA. But just what bigger power player are they serving in the intended subversion of America? All politicians have to sell themselves to someone to succeed politically. Integrity is tossed to the wind and is replaced with a lifelong swim in the political cesspool. We hope that Trump does not have now, nor ever will have that kind of political bondage. In other words, gaslighting is the process of slick lying which can only become exposed when the rubber hits the road, not before. Which is what Obama did to get elected. And now Cruz is doing the same.

    Like

    • Gail Combs says:

      ” But just what bigger power player are they serving in the intended subversion of America?”

      The answer is right here in black and white:

      This is the scientific paper:
      The Network of Global Corporate Control 2011
      http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025995

      This names corporations and the people uncovered by that paper.
      The Global 1%: Exposing the Transnational Ruling Class
      http://www.projectcensored.org/the-global-1-exposing-the-transnational-ruling-class/

      Realize these are the high level serfs.

      If you trace Shell Oil you find Shell oil VP Ged Davis wrote Agenda 21. You find World Wild Life Fund is run by those connected to Shell oil and you find the Dutch Royal Family, the British Royal Family, the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers own a healthy as in controling chunk.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Gail Combs says:

        A couple comments about that Shell oil thread link and link

        Warning, unlike JohnnyBoy, I do have a tendency to dig.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Johnny D says:

          I bare myself along with my dichotomy. A geologist and devout Christian. I love my country. I still remember that russian slapping his shoes on the podium saying he would tear us down from the inside. I’ve been watching it everyday since. If Trump is who “my people” have chosen” then so be it. I’ll cast my ballot and those with in my influence will do the same. Enjoy the day! My Father made this day! So be it.

          Like

      • Linda Ruth says:

        When Trump proclaims that he “knows” people, he means it– private, economic, political knowledge tucked away in his resource files. The circle he has spent his life involved with have been in the ranks of wealth and power, internationally and in America. The world realm is not-so-nice to be economically involved in. Influence and coercion go hand-in-hand in getting “deals” and concessions. Trump definitely has the “goods” to get actions done his way. As President he can’t legally just be a dictator making Executive Orders as Obama has been illegally doing. Congressional cooperation is mandatory under the Constitution, but Trump has had his influence invested there already. Think he’s making people anxious, maybe a little fearful? Yes!

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s