FBI Frustrations – President Obama Trying To Influence National Security Investigation of Hillary Clinton…

obama-hillary-holding-hands-wh-photoWASHINGTON — Federal agents were still cataloging the classified information from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s personal email server last week when President Obama went on television and played down the matter.

“I don’t think it posed a national security problem,” Mr. Obama said Sunday on CBS’s “60 Minutes.” He said it was a mistake for Mrs. Clinton to use a private email account when she was secretary of state, but his conclusion was unmistakable: “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”

Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clinton’s email setup had in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.

Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said Mr. Obama was not trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time.

A spokesman for the F.B.I. declined to comment. But Ron Hosko, a former senior F.B.I. official who retired in 2014 and is now the president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, said it was inappropriate for the president to “suggest what side of the investigation he is on” when the F.B.I. is still investigating.  (read more)

Hillary - orange is the new black

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Election 2016, media bias, Operation Zero Footprint, Secretary of State, Sept 11, Susan Rice, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

99 Responses to FBI Frustrations – President Obama Trying To Influence National Security Investigation of Hillary Clinton…

  1. John Galt says:

    Kabuki. Hillary indictment soon.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. R-C says:

    The Narcissist-in-Chief once again tries to make the story all about HIM: “I don’t think this posed a national security threat…”

    Number one, Obama’s opinion on this matter is completely IRRELEVANT. It doesn’t matter what he “thinks” went on here, or what the exposure of data might have been. We have competent people–professional investigators–to determine that.

    Second, whether or not a foreign power hacked into that server, the simple fact is that breaches of security protocol (mandated by the Espionage Act) DID in fact take place–that much has been released to the public already. Emails containing CLASSIFIED information was exposed–sent on Shrillary’s illicit, unsecured private server. THAT is the crime–that Shrillary and her many minions did not properly safeguard the classified information entrusted to them.

    Third, Shrillary’s oft-repeated claim that the info “wasn’t marked” as classified is also IRRELEVANT. She was paid to KNOW the difference here: the markings do not make the info classified; the info makes the markings necessary. SOMEBODY took those markings off, thinking that made the info suitable to transmit over Shrillary’s server. WRONG answer. Whoever scrubbed the markings off that information is also guilty.

    Fourth, ever single person granted an upper clearance is required to attend briefings on their responsibilities for the proper handling and safeguarding of classified information and systems. We hear that Shrillary blew off her briefings–that she never attended them and never signed the acknowledgement forms. Now, she seems to be pushing “I didn’t know” as an excuse. To be clear: there IS no excuse–blow off your briefings and you’re still liable to adhere to the law.

    Fifth, every single properly-cleared person who handled these emails was under the requirement to REPORT the fact that classified info had been found on an unclassified system. Thus far, we haven’t heard of a single person who did. Each instance of that is another security violation. And, if we find out that somebody did report a violation (or violations) and it was covered up? Yet more violations and more charges.

    Those citizens among us who hold upper-level security clearance go to work each day knowing that they bear a heavy burden of responsibility regarding classified information. The vast majority of them do their jobs honorably and with extreme diligence. Some, however (Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, Hillary Clinton), clearly do not care. The Espionage Act exists to deal with the latter. To NOT prosecute Hillary Clinton (et al) to the fullest will only serve to dishonor the former, those millions of diligent citizens entrusted with upper-level clearances.

    Letting Hillary skate on this issue is simply unacceptable.

    Liked by 18 people

    • wondering999 says:

      Agree with you — except not so sure about the characterization of Snowden. Wonder if Snowden ever went into the Clinton server… suspect he could have. How is it that lower level people like Snowden are forced to flee — for violations that the administration considers OK if done at the very top? Doesn’t make sense to me

      Liked by 2 people

      • R-C says:

        With Snowden, the only difference is his “motivation”. He chose to leak massive amounts of classified data because he was moved by…what…”altruism”? With Shrillary, it’s arrogance; hubris.

        Whatever the motivation, both were bound to comply with the Espionage Act, and both failed to do so. Whether one’s motive was “good” or “bad” doesn’t factor into the breached data–the bottom line there is that “Top Secret” information, when breached, can cause “exceptionally grave damage”. Individuals have been killed over these types of breach.

        And, as to your question, it’s pure hypocrisy to differentiate between the lowest level violators–Manning, in my example, and Hillary at the top. “A breach is a breach” should be the philosophy, but isn’t.

        They’ll want Hillary to walk because she is the liberals’ Queen.

        Liked by 5 people

    • Sharon says:

      Letting Hillary skate on this issue is simply unacceptable.

      Not to everyone.

      Like

      • peachteachr says:

        I, too, see the rapt faces in Hillary’s crowd. I think her demons this cycle are so different from her last presidential run that she almost appears flat-footed with a deer in the headlights look. She is so disliked and this was to be the easy part of her campaign, and a time for her to bask in her party’s love…it’s not happening.
        Hillary gets a couple of good days of coverage and then something like the newly discovered “secret e-mail account” of Huma Abedin comes out. Couldn’t be happening to a more deceitful human alive today.Bring it on, karma!

        Liked by 3 people

    • winky says:

      What difference does it make??……she could be subjected to blackmail if she were president ..that is a problem…Our Mr. Trump has wreaked some serious havoc with all these low life scumbags…

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Southern Son says:

    Elijah Cummings said, The 4.5 million dollars that have been spent on the email witch hunt, has been a terrible waste of Taxpayer Dollars. The msm has NO questions about oblamo’s 4.5 million golf outings/campaign trips this spring. SD, I believe this is rich for you. I know this can be exploited by you, better than me.

    Liked by 6 people

  4. refjaf55 says:

    It blows my mind that so many are liberal are trying to make it seem like this is not a big issue. What Bernie did during the debate was absolutely absurd. The crazy things is, is that it actually gave him a boost possibly, while she is dropping http://newsdailynow.com/2015/10/16/bernie-is-catching-hillary/

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      The whole Hillary e-mail “scandal” is being pushed by the vast right-wing conspiracy at the New York Times. 😉

      Liked by 2 people

      • notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital says:

        Pardon me, but HILLARY’S TREASON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        Like

      • John Galt says:

        Leaks to NYT courtesy of ValJar.

        Liked by 3 people

        • 1hear2learn says:

          I hope she leaks some more – and I hope the Clinton’s fire back and in the end expose both “teams” for who they really are! Bill & Hill held back their fire last time thinking they would still get their just desserts, but this is her last shot this time and I don’t see them just taking all the hits this time without firing back. Best thing that could ever happen is for Hillary to get indicted, and not given a pardon by the O’s administration – can you imagine the stories that would some out then??? But they have her by the short hairs right now because if indicted, she will need O to pardon her and therefore cannot fire back at O and ValJar gang.

          Liked by 1 person

      • BitterC says:

        Indeed, Sentient. I find it very interesting that the NYT has been in the forefront of exposing Hillary.
        I scanned the comments in the NYT article above and again, found interesting that the “NYT Picks” on comments were 50-50 or 60-40 AGAINST the Grifteress.

        Liked by 2 people

    • sixmax11 says:

      i thought the same thing. he was given an opportunity to attack his rival and instead he takes her side! not the behavior you normally see in the primary.

      Like

    • Because they can’t HANDLE the truth!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Southern Son says:

    I intended to say, SD can Enlighten on this matter, far better than I can. RC proves again why I come here. Enlightenment comes from ALL the Treepers!! We are indeed, Engaged.

    Like

  6. emet says:

    Yeah, leave Hillary alone, she’ll be good. And look over there at those white policemen, the FBI should be seeing what they are up to. And what about that Arizona sheriff, got him yet?

    Liked by 1 person

  7. hocuspocus13 says:

    “Orange” pant suits…Hill will fit right in it’s the color of the prison fashion designers 👚

    Like

  8. Dems B. Dcvrs says:

    “Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months …”

    I am not buying their outrage. There is already more than enough evidenced, coupled to Killary Lying, and covering up, for F.B.I. to have arrested her.

    If any of us here had pulled what Killary did, Lied about it, tried to cover-up what was done, and hampered numerous investigations, we would already be in Federal Prison.

    Signs that F.B.I. had gone corrupt / rogue came in 2008, when F.B.I. refused to investigate Obama’s forged Certificate of Live Birth. If Trump does become President, he needs to clean house at F.B.I.

    Liked by 6 people

    • R-C says:

      So, if I were the Special Agent in Charge of this investigation, I’d want to be very meticulous indeed. I’d proceed with the ultimate care, crafting an absolutely unassailable case–we’re talking about Hillary Clinton and others in the administration.

      These investigations take the time they take.

      Liked by 6 people

    • regedit says:

      I d love that-void last 8 years of his presidency,repeal every action he has taken
      that would be dream come true

      Liked by 3 people

  9. truthandjustice says:

    It’ll be interesting to see what Biden does. Probably infighting within the Globalist Power Elites – the American ones and the European ones about who should win…goes back and forth. Seemingly the Obama bunch cartel lost and needs to walk back.
    Meanwhile “they” are moving full steam ahead with their gun confiscation goals. Hillary saying we need stricter confiscation laws like Australia, etc. – like a “permitting approach”, which ties in to the other things like Strong Cities Network, TPA, UN Arms Treaty, new Obama czar to hunt down “right wing extremists” (you know the anti-Government vulgarians like us)…………

    New Obama Czar – to hunt down “right wing extremists”.

    http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/new-obama-czar-will-hunt-right-wing-extremists/

    Hillary saying we need stricter gun confiscation laws —

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/16/hillary-clinton-australia-gun-ban-worth-looking-u-s/

    Like

    • Dems B. Dcvrs says:

      Can’t help but wonder if Elitists are not worried about Biden being Elected. He has proven to be a loose cannon. They don’t like unknowns and surprises. Bad for markets…

      Like

    • 1hear2learn says:

      Let them try. There’s a reason they cannot pass legislation on gun control like that even when the House and Senate are all Dem majorities. It would be a landslide election, even if Bush was the nominee.

      Like

  10. steve fraser says:

    If true, the Director should resign.

    Like

  11. jeans2nd says:

    And yet – another “watch what the right hand is doing so as to miss what the left hand is doing”? I wonder.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. AdukeLAXobserver says:

    FBI is going to get real mad… Then Lynch will do nothing.

    Liked by 5 people

    • 1hear2learn says:

      I agree with comment up thread – FBI needs to slow walk this until after the elections so all of their hard work does not go up in smoke. Just let the drips continue on to show they are working hard to be extra diligent… but I don’t know how long they can continue on in this matter before the press and Hillary demand the investigation draws to a conclusion.

      Liked by 1 person

  13. preppin247 says:

    Not surprising no one is stepping to the forefront to charge Killary….ARKANCIDE seems to happen to those who cross the clintons

    Liked by 4 people

  14. emet says:

    The only thing that makes the FBI mad, is when they are unsuccessful at claiming the work of other agencies as their own.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. auscitizenmom says:

    I am still of the opinion that the leaks about the emails has come from ValJar. I believe Obozo’s statements are just kabuki theater to help confuse the issue. If Hillery does as they want then she will get off. If she doesn’t she will be prosecuted.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I agree with you 100%. Obama is play acting for the public on this one. I suspect that he’s already put a bug in Loretta Lynch’s ear that is telling her to prosecute Hillary if she doesn’t drop out for a Biden win.

      Liked by 2 people

      • bofh says:

        And yet, I’m really starting to wonder if Biden actually wants it this time around. He chased it for so many years, but sometimes now seems like he’s done – no fire in the belly.

        Liked by 2 people

        • 1hear2learn says:

          I think he lost his chance now by not being in the last debate and Bernie handing her that gift. Only reason anyone watched that stinkin debate was to see if any of those bozo’s had the guts to call Hillary out on the emails.

          Also, been bugging me since the debate – When AC asked Hillary about her “email issue” and going before the committee to testify – the question was posed as if the purpose of the committee was to look into HRC’s emails – but it is a Benghazi committee! To look into why the proper security was not provided, to look into why no rescue mission was launched at the start, to look into why the administration and HRC blamed a stupid video, and continued to blame that video until after the election… the committee was not formed to look into HRC’s emails, THAT was a by-product of the investigation. We lost a US Ambassador for crying out loud, as well as 3 other Americans in that disaster of foreign policy, secrecy & bureaucracy. Those families, and all Americans, deserve a real investigation into how and why that happened – not some scapegoating for political scores or cover-ups. If the folks responsible for the multiple screw ups would just come clean, the American people can be quite forgiving – but the lies and cover-ups – that’s what is just unforgivable, in my opinion.

          Like

      • VegasGuy says:

        I kinda disagree with that. I will put my own handicapping on the line & say that Biden will not run. He has been posturing for months yet hasn’t pulled the trigger.

        Obozo’s hint that HRC did not hinder security was enough of a trip wire for me. That is support in an indirect manner for her. If Biden were to enter now, in order for him to be viable, he has to gain support of the Southern States Black vote, just like Obama did. And he has to do that quickly to gain any traction. Dispite the “fantasy” polls, he has an uphill battle getting in so late.

        To do that, win the Southern States Black vote, he has to be endorsed by Obama. Additionally, because HRC & Sanders have both moved so far left, for him to be in the run, Biden now has to go there as well. That would be counter to Obama & counter to the administration that Biden is currently still in. Won’t really fly with the Dem. base. He would be presenting a platform that is counter to his very own policy and against his current boss. Not a favorable position to be put in. Especially for someone with such a long political history looking for a legacy as a final hoorah.

        Would that be believable? I’d have a hard time buying that.

        He has been lurking to see if HRC “bombed” at the debate. If she had, he would have announced right after. But, it turned out that she was the “best if the worst”. So she is still solid in the run.

        The next gambet is her testimony on Oct 22. & Obozo, emboldened & assisted by some key GOPe’s, interjected enough executive “support” for her to potentially clear that hurdle. And it was after the debate, when & while MSM was touting her splendid performance & she while was basking in the glow of “partisan witch hunting”.

        So Obozo’s innocuous endorsement of her would be counter to his endorsing Biden at this point. And without his endorsement, Biden, dispite his general likability, can’t catch up & be competitive at this point with out the Black vote at the outset.

        So the Dems are hanging their hats on HRC to go all the way. But you know the addage….The best laid plans…….

        Time ( and the FBI) will tell. IMO, my money is on Biden passing the race, HRC not making it to the General, & a Trump/Sanders vote off.

        Silly me….No contest…..And AirForce 1 is a much nicer plane too boot….As Trump would say “..this plane is yuge…”

        Liked by 1 person

    • John Galt says:

      Yes, I think that the leak is for the purpose of posturing Obozo as the “good cop” — in spite of which Hillary will be indicted because the FBI is the “bad cop”. Look, it wasn’t for political purposes, Obozo thinks Hillary is just swell, but the nasty FBI insisted.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Chewbarkah says:

        Obama’s similar comments about Petraeus, followed by his indictment, back up your position. In both cases, Obama says something to the effect of “national security was not compromised”, but is silent on whether the law was violated (appropriately so, since Presidents should not pronounce anyone guilty before trial). A national security breach are his concern and would be seen as a failing of HIS administration, whereas Hillary’s email malfeasance is her personal problem (at least that’s how they want to spin it).

        Like

      • 2x4x8 says:

        there is also the Benghazi Committee report, it will state violations, the Democrats can’t control the narrative and in time call it a phony scandal

        Like

    • lilbirdee'12 says:

      I’m torn on this issue. Either way, Zero can say “I paved the way for Clintoon or Biden”. But, having loose lips Biden on the campaign trail instead of hidden away with duct tape on his mouth, Zero has no control over what could happen. Who knows, BillyBoy could have put some pressure on the Commander-in-Grief.

      Like

  16. regedit says:

    Obama wants Hillary out, to pave way for
    Bernie to complete his communist transformation of America

    Liked by 1 person

    • notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital says:

      Seems reasonable……..
      .
      But if Obama really wanted to bury Hillary, Obama would fully endorse and campaign for her. Obama has the Reverse Midas Touch. Everything he touches turns into….. ________fill in the blank________.

      Like

    • John Galt says:

      “to complete his communist transformation of America”

      and remove Clinton Foundation competition from his post-presidency schemes.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. mrscribbler says:

    As far as I’m concerned, arrest Choom Boy for treason (innumerable instances) and obstruction of justice (in at least the Shrillery Clinton matters) and let the FBI do their work. If the admini9stration and its former members are allowed to commit felonies with impunity, our nation is lost.

    The issue is larger than just the former SecState. It has become: can we again be a nation of laws, or are we doomed to third-world tin-pot dictatorship for eternity?

    Liked by 4 people

  18. TheTorch says:

    This is funny, just to lighten the mood (from another blog site), while the GOPe and other splodey heads are embarking on another it is the end for Donald Trump because of his 911 comments:

    poster 1: So this is supposed to be a controversy or something?
    poster 2: NOTHING COULD BE WORSE! NOTHING!
    poster 3: GOODBYE, MR. TRUMP! AGAIN!!!

    GOPe:
    Were always saying Goodbye

    Like

  19. What? Obama never took sides in an ongoing investigation before the facts were known! He only said:

    “If I had an off-site server, it would look like Hillary Clinton’s!”

    Liked by 3 people

  20. patinga4 says:

    Obama’s comment reminds of the “not a smidgeon” .

    Liked by 4 people

  21. goodoldboy66 says:

    Clinton walks, skates, slithers – into 1600.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. PatriotKate says:

    Trial date set for Racketeering lawsuit against the Clinton Foundation — January 20, 2016 right before the Iowa Caucuses.
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-orders-clinton-foundation-racketeering-case-to-trial/article/2565272

    Liked by 3 people

  23. JeremyR says:

    Barry, “This is not a situation in which America’s national security was endangered.”
    Translation: “nothing she did could make it worse than what he’s done.”

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Millwright says:

    Seems more of the President’s SOP when it comes to our laws. First Gates, then the TM debacle, to Sherrod, to the NBP voter intimidation, to OF&F, and now the Hillary stage show. But watch the hands, folks watch the hands. Our POTUS is opening a new “anti-terrorism” effort on the domestic front by credentialing that bastion of legal and social propriety, the SPLC and creating yet another “czar” administrative post. I feel confident they will become his “enforcers” in his new “war on guns” – those legally-owned by citizens and veterans – along with all the organizations and web sites they frequent.

    Liked by 1 person

  25. Juan says:

    Here’s the ticket …..

    Liked by 5 people

  26. steve fraser says:

    “National Security Breakdown”, not email…..

    Like

  27. Frank O'Pinion says:

    If the FBI was interested in doing their job, B.HUSSEIN Obama never would have been selected to usurpe the office of the POTUS. Instead, Obama would would have been incarcerated for the remaining years of his miserable life.

    Barack HUSSEIN Obama is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on the citizens of the U.S.A. by all of the cowards in Congress, by all of the traitors in the U.S. Supreme Court, by all of the brain-dead Democratic voters, by all of the white guilt insane Republican voters, and by all of the Communists in the main-stream media.

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2988968/posts

    The U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 states, in part, that a person who is competing for the office of the president of the United States (POTUS) must be a natural born Citizen (NBC). The Founding Fathers who drew up the U.S. Constitution KNEW that an NBC was an individual that was born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen parents.

    Neither Barack Hussein Obama nor John McCain are natural born (U.S.) citizens. U.S. Senate Resolution (SR) 511 was a sham and a scam to detract from Obama’s ineligibility. SR 511 was a useless political pat-on-the-back gesture with no legal standing. U.S. Senator John McCain was born to two U.S. citizens, but not on U.S. soil.

    You need to access this website

    http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

    in order to educate yourself on who a natural born (U.S.) citizen is and why the Founding Fathers of the U.S. Constitution singled-out this requirement only for the executive branch of the U.S.A. As you will know by reading the U.S. Constitution, Article I, you will see the distinct reduction of this NBC requirement to a ‘plain vanilla’ Citizen for members of Congress.

    The bought-and-paid-for complicit criminals in the Congressional Research Services (CRS) have convoluted the true meaning of NBC to suit the needs of the illegal and putative president Obama. I will not be swayed by the lies that the CRS feeds to the lawmakers to pass on to their constituents in order to quell their ( constituents) concerns about the ineligibility of Obama.

    Then access this website

    https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/announcement-thousands-of-sheriff-kits-mailed-to-every-county-sheriff-in-usa/

    to know that there are millions of U.S. citizens out there that are not fooled by the Obama regime that has created a Constitutional Crisis as of January 20, 2009, when the traitor and Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court John Roberts swore in the undocumented alien and ineligible candidate Barack Hussein Obama to the office of the POTUS. The truth of who Obama really is will eventually surface to the top. The truth will not be suppressed forever by the criminals in charge and by the Communists in the main-stream media.

    Indicting this enemy (Obama) of the U.S.A. and his enablers for high treason will provide a foundation to correct the evils and ills that have destroyed this Constitutional Republic.

    Congress protects Obama to protect themselves from misprision of treason.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. ctdar says:

    obama’s remarks almost seem like a quid pro quo. Bill told him you cover her or you will go down. Does anyone seriously think during all that time of her running a private server (s) including months leading up to, during and after Benghazi that the Secretary of State and the President did not correspond??
    Obama is up to his ears in that server.

    Liked by 1 person

    • John Galt says:

      “Bill told him you cover her or you will go down.”

      Clinton has zero leverage. Obozo / Biden have pardon power.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ctdar says:

        You don’t think Clintons held back incriminating Obama email correspondence?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Obama also has the protection of the office of president. He has to be impeached before he can be prosecute for anything.. Not to mention the fact that Obama has full control over every investigative agency. Think the stone walls that hinder the Benghazi Committee were high? Just wait until someone tries to investigate Obama. LOL Trump won’t need to have the Mexicans pay to build a border wall. They’ll just need to pay for moving it there.

        Like

  29. Millwright says:

    Just an “OTW” supposition, but what happens if HC gets elected, then indicted ? A lot depends upon who is VP. Seems to me a lot is flying “behind the scenery” in this run up to the primaries. A lot more could be “flown” during the run-up to the election. Thanks to Sundance we’re more aware than most, but even Sundance isn’t omniscient ! SD, I respect your opinions/judgements, and revere your dedication to exposing a lot of covert agendas to scrutiny ! Keep up your amazing work !

    Like

    • BitterC says:

      OMG. She gets elected w the Castro boy and then gets indicted for Xmas. That would be extremely cruel and I could see Zero/Val relishing that.
      Juan becomes prez and continues Zero’s American Transformation. Scare-y

      Like

  30. czarowniczy says:

    Let’s face it, the Clintons have never had any real interest in US national security unless it in someway profits them. Again I mention it – Bill had a raft of workers in the WH who NEVER had a security/background check and had access to sensitive information. the national PROFESSIONAL (as in ‘not political’) security apparatus had an 8-year fit about that but it didn’t bother Bill, he just bumbled on helping the Chinese increase the accuracy and throw–weight of their dual-use peaceful space exploration program missiles.
    My question isn’t so much about Hillary but the POtuS. While all of the smoke and dust surrounding her actions are filling the air how much, what kind of and to whom might the POtuS and his krewe have divulged/are still divulging sensitive US information? You 110% sure that all of those many minions he sneaks into his advisory staff at regular intervals aren’t feeding military/fiscal/LEA/political information to whom?

    Liked by 1 person

  31. I think it’s more smoke and mirrors from the FBI. Wouldn’t surprise me one bit if Clinton walks Scott free. Obama, the SCOTUS, IRS & the State Department don’t obey or get punished for disobeying the law and our Constitution, why should Clinton? This administration is rife with corruption and skullduggery from top to bottom and the harm will resonate for a generation!

    Like

  32. shipley130 says:

    Hillary Clinton was busy helping her pals get “work” in middle eastern companies. Gee, do you think that could be a motivating factor in using “private” servers? Hillary Clinton never expected anyone to ever see that.

    Like

  33. Mike says:

    Of course. This regime is guilty of endemic Robert Mugabe style corruption. Did anyone really expect less from a communist of Obama’s pedigree?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s