Quite Revealing – Obama proclaims his bi-partisanship regularly, but in 2010 he didn’t have Speaker Boehner’s phone number….

This is just reflective of something any substantive political watcher already knows; but it is affirming to find supportive evidence nonetheless.

President Obama continually sells the story of his across the aisle outreach as an excuse for why his policies failed.  He claims he tried too hard to work with the other side.

This is a regular talking point for the institutional leftists.   However, the truth is divergent in the extreme, and Bob Woodward hits on it within his new book “The Price of Politics”.

In an example Woodward shares:

The failure of Obama to connect with Boehner was vaguely reminiscent of another phone call late in the evening of Election Day 2010, after it became clear that the Republicans would take control of the House, making Boehner Speaker of the House.

Nobody in the Obama orbit could even find the soon-to-be-speaker’s phone number, Woodward reports. A Democratic Party aide finally secured it through a friend so the president could offer congratulations.

Can you imagine how “full of himself” President Obama must have been with his majority holding of the White House, The House of Representatives and the Senate in 2009/2010?

So internally focused on his own party, and ignoring of any other perspective (evidenced in the Obamacare fiasco) the entire White House did not even have a phone number for the #1 Republican leader in congress.

Kind of hard to sell the story of bi-partisanship when the truth is you don’t even know how to contact the other side of the aisle, no?

This entry was posted in Election 2012, Obama re-election, Obama Research/Discovery, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Quite Revealing – Obama proclaims his bi-partisanship regularly, but in 2010 he didn’t have Speaker Boehner’s phone number….

  1. cajunkelly says:

    If someone said of my side of the aisle:

    “if they bring a knife to the fight, we’ll bring a gun”

    I wouldn’t call that an “outreach”, and I wouldn’t be inclined to work with the side making that threat.


  2. cajunkelly says:

    “If you get hit, we will punch back twice as hard,”

    Another of his oh-so-conciliatory (cough) comments.

    Lemme find the other one I’m thinking about….

    oh yeah…to the Latinos

    “If the Latinos sit out the election instead of saying ‘we’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us”

    Sounds like he’s clinging to violence, while we cling to our Bible, eh?


  3. czarowniczy says:

    ‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

    ‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’

    ‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.’

    Apparently Lewis Carroll foresaw the Obamas of this world. Wonder why the MSM doesn’t ask the Karing Kenyon what his definition of ‘bi-partisanship’ be?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s