The Tsarnaev Miranda – Who Exactly is Judge Marianne Bowler ? Who Directed Her, and Why?…. [We have her CURRICULUM VITAE Embedded]

The FBI works for, and falls under the authority of, the Federal Department of Justice, Eric Holder.   Which brings in a strange series of questions regarding the stoppage of questioning by the FBI of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.   Megyn Kelly outlines the initial issue:

Initially the feds proclaimed Tsarnaev would fall under the “public safety exception to miranda” which would have given them 48 hours to question him prior to the delivery of Miranda protection.   The feds didn’t even need to charge him with anything right away – but they did.   In addition, something, obviously unexpected by the FBI interrogators, was changed.  Who changed it? Why? and why was the FBI not notified of the intent to change direction?

Boston AP [excerpt] … Once Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was read his rights on Monday, he immediately stopped talking, according to four officials of both political parties who were briefed on the interrogation but insisted on anonymity because the briefing was private.

After roughly 16 hours of questioning, investigators were surprised when a magistrate judge and a representative from the U.S. Attorney’s office entered the hospital room and read Tsarnaev his rights, the four officials and one law enforcement official said. Investigators had planned to keep questioning him.

[...] District Court Judge Marianne Bowler arrived at the hospital where he is being treated to preside over his initial hearing Monday, when she read him his Miranda rights.

But Fox News’ sources say there was confusion about Bowler’s timing, with some voicing concerns that investigators were not given enough time to question Dzhokhar under the “public safety exception” invoked by the Justice Department.

Obviously if Judge Bowler walked into the questioning, unexpectedly, then you can infer the DOJ and the FBI were not sympatico on the Tsarnaev process.   Why?  What gives?

Perhaps a review of who Eric Holder sent to the hospital, Judge Marianne Bowler, will help us better understand what’s at play here;  AND make no mistake about it – it was Eric Holder who sent her in to that hospital, no DOJ underling would make such a high-profile decision on their own.  This was 100% an Eric Holder decision.

Back to Bowler –   Judge Bowler was a Clinton appointee, and it will probably not surprise readers that she is exceptionally versed in Muslim sensibilities.   So much so that she is the first female judge to have spoken in Kuwait (1997).  [See page 5 of her embedded resume' below]

(HatTip Front Page Mag) Apparently in that capacity, she visited and spoke on legal issues at a number of Muslim countries, becoming the first female judge to speak in Kuwait, appearing also in Egypt and in the United Arab Emirates.

But look at 2012.   Speaking/Lecturing in Egypt, Cairo University.  

If there’s one specific ME aspect we are familiar with, it’s Egypt and Libya 2011, 2012 and 2013.   

That 2012 trip is “Post Morsi” – Meaning she was delivering her speech at Cairo University after the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and the release from jail of Ayman al-Zawahiri.   Meaning…. she had to have the approval of The Muslim Brotherhood to be an American Judge in Egypt – delivering a lecture, at Cairo University in 2012.

Is it a coincidence that a well versed, perhaps one of the best Muslim versed, judges on the East Coast – stemming from an area steeped in liberalism, and having attended the fully vested progressive indoctrination education and legal career, was selected to walk unexpectedly in to a questioning session of an admitted Islamist Jihadist – and stop the interrogation in its tracks?

You decide.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev 2

For me personally, against the backdrop of fully advanced Political Correctness, intentionally designed by the current administration to deconstruct the Homeland Security safeguards surrounding terror profiling of Muslims, I now put Tsarnaev’s success on the same white-board as Fort Hood shooter, Major Nidal Hassan.

That’s what Eric Holder is sweeping away….  Period. 

*TIP* On an unrelated note keep an eye on CNN contributor and former CIA operative Bob Baer’s commentary.  He’s off the liberal range and annoyingly connecting dots on this one.  I think the post 9/11 Obama shredding of security has irked him.

About these ads
This entry was posted in A New America, Conspiracy ?, Death Threats, Egypt & Libya Part 2, Fabian Socialists - Modern Progressives, Islam, Obama Research/Discovery, Police action, Terrorist Attacks, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

103 Responses to The Tsarnaev Miranda – Who Exactly is Judge Marianne Bowler ? Who Directed Her, and Why?…. [We have her CURRICULUM VITAE Embedded]

  1. jordan2222 says:

    “investigators were surprised when a magistrate judge and a representative from the U.S. Attorney’s office entered the hospital room and read Tsarnaev his rights”

    Who let them into the room? Wasn’t it sealed?

    • PatriotUSA says:

      Even if the room was sealed, that means NOTHING to the traitors and jackboots.

    • unitron says:

      Do you mean like Hazmat “sealed”, or some FBI agents standing guard?

      ‘Cause I’m sure a Federal Magistrate Judge and a representative from the U.S. Attorney’s office could have brought along some U.S. Marshals to explain jurisdictional questions and chain of command to them if they thought they were there to protect the prisoner of the federal government from the federal government.

    • danielle davito says:

      I have no idea as to people’s shock and dismay over Mr.Tsarnaev being mirandized.For one thing it’s the law,and secondly, it was done in some foolish attempt to make a ‘confession’ look ‘official’.He couldn’t speak,hear,nod his head,or write at the time.Not to mention the morphine drip he was on.Lucid,my ass!Oh,and he agreed to ‘voluntary detention’.Hasn’t anyone(the court,lawyers,etc.) realized,that they never ARRESTED him!Duh!Anyway, the kid is innocent,and I can prove it.Why do you think they came up with the ‘boat confession’.I contacted the DOJ,and Mass.District court,and pointed out that the hospital ‘confession’ was inadmissable because of the reasons listed above. And wouldn’t you know it,within days, they had another ‘confession’ to take it’s place.He didn’t admit to anything in that note.He did thank Mr.Henneberry for “letting me hide in your boat”.

  2. PatriotUSA says:

    Cracking it WIDE OPEN and this smelled of Holder right away. Even as dopey as I am from lack of sleep and chaos, this one has red flashing lights all over it. Great jobs flinging away the layers here.

    So will this tragedy be labeled as a kitchen accident or dining room violence. Unreal, Now I need a few more nightcaps. Gotta step away before me language gets the better of me.
    Stepping outside to pray……….

  3. PatriotUSA says:

    Bob Baer connects too many dots and he will end up in a ditch someplace, dead. The Clinton’s and Obama’s have a way for people who get too nosy or deep to end up dead. Now I am leaving to pray. Jesus help us……….

    • sundance says:

      Yeah…. he’s annoying them, and you can clearly see it. For whatever reason, he’s speaking to the *common sense* of the entire construct and using his background to explain how, who, and why?….

      So far Baer has destroyed the “lone wolf angle”, the “untrained angle”, the “got it off the internet angle”, the “FBI ball drop angle”, and quite a few more…… The human intelligence aspect of which he is skilled is rising to the top as he is asked questions about the Tsarnaev brothers human interactions. Baer is doing really well on this one.

      I’m surprised that Susan Kelly gal hasn’t shown her face yet to deflect and protect the Obama/Holder administration like she did in Benghazi….. As soon as she shows her face on TV you know the questions are too close for comfort.

    • Jane106 says:

      Baer will not end up in a ditch. He joined the CIA out of college; spent 21 years with the Agency and QUIT. That was after he was recalled home from overseas and investigated by the FBI. He really can say almost anything he wants to about his time with the Agency as they will neither confirm or deny. I asked someone who I knew quite well about Baer’s time and was told that he was not too respected within the CIA but that was all he would say. The book Bair wrote was also a matter of contention within the ranks–probably because he painted a picture using some fiction. He is fluent in many languages; his career could have been that of merely a translator; we will never know for sure..

  4. Rick Madigan says:

    Thanks Sundance for keeping on this and for these juicy nuggets of information. What you are doing with this blog is simply amazing and so necessary for a time like this!

    Esther 4:15 “And who knows but that you have come to your royal position for such a time as this?”

  5. waltherppk says:

    When subversive un-American business is being conducted, birds of a feather flock together. The U.S. government is surreptitiously enabling terrorism while it proclaims it is fighting it, the ruse being employed to destroy civil liberties as the price which people must pay for imagined “protection” …along with a few trillion dollars “protection payola” of course. And the idea of “security and safety” being provided by “authorized protection providers” (agents of the state) is the pig in a poke that THE PEOPLE are being sold at gunpoint by the police state as the offer so good they simply can’t refuse. Why hasn’t the Fort Hood shooter been put in front of a firing squad? Because keeping the boogie man alive projects a veiled threat that they might turn him loose, which is useful as a psychological intimidation, but after he is dead he has no value as a psychological weapon. The U.S. government is actively engaging in psychological warfare against its own constituent citizens whom it is supposed to serve.

    • eweturn says:

      “The U.S. government is surreptitiously enabling terrorism while it proclaims it is fighting it”
      Why are so many drunk on the kool-aide?

      • waltherppk says:

        When the U.S. government is supplying arms to Mexican drug cartels and the muslim brotherhood while pursuing regulations and “laws” which enrich and empower those enemies while at the same time infringing the rights of bona fide U.S. citizens, it is a showing of OBVIOUS subversive, seditious, and treasonous acts being WRONGLY done by government as EVIL against its own people. It goes beyond lawlessness to criminality and enmity of a government that is being a predatory enemy upon those it supposed to serve. Will this ultimately end when the roads to Washington D.C.are lined with 30,000 crosses bearing the remains of crucified bureaucrats as food for the buzzards? Is every rebellious bureaucrat chanting “I am Spartacus” (and seeking a reckoning)? Those who fail to learn the lessons of history are destined to repeat it.

  6. boutis says:

    What the devil is the US-Ukrainian Association and the first woman judge to speak in Kuwait? This is no spring chicken as she graduated 1967 with an AB before an old dog like me graduated high school. And yes it sounds like Holder shopped for “special interests” to find one willing to do it. Flunkies in the US attorney office would be easy.

    • waltherppk says:

      We need an online map showing where all the stupid progs are located, to assist secret admirers when it comes time for throwing Valentines.

      • Jane106 says:

        Oh, I have every confidence you and your ilk will come up with the map you so desperately need; but finding progs is not your solution. As a matter of fact, you have many pieces of the problem right here…scan up to the top of the page where it begins…”The Tsarnaev Miranda – Who Exactly…”

        Beware of the half truths. You may have gotten hold of the wrong half. (unk)

        • waltherppk says:

          My “ilk” as you would suppose “my kind” to be are those oath keepers who don’t play by a double standard that some assert annoints a “designated elite” as bound by one set of laws, to live as subversives who hide behind the very laws they use to oppress those regarded to be somehow “beneath themselves”, while operating on a false premise of occupying some “moral high ground”. Bring that crap out of the star chambers and into the street and see how far that crap goes, your mileage may vary. The “designated elite” can’t all have an entourage of body guards and live in bunkers, but measured against their arrogance anyone would get the impression they believe they can do that or for no reason would ever have such need to worry. Some people are intimidated by corrupt authority because they are pacificist by nature. Others are only provoked by evil and will square off with it any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Have a nice day.

        • waltherppk says:

          The next time the Russians need to do some ethnic cleansing, instead of interfering we should probably deliver a gallon of chlorox and some tidy-bowl and a toilet brush to the Russian ambassador and wish them good hunting.

  7. AdukeLAXobserver says:

    Clinton appointee told me all I needed to know.

  8. michellc says:

    If we had a true checks and balance like the founding fathers meant for us to have all of these people would be charged with treason, Obama would be at the top of the list. Instead we have a congress who are just as guilty for their inaction. Then we have Islam infiltrated in the republican party as well.
    I’ll call it like I see it, mosques are full of radicals, any Muslim following their book hates us infidels and want to kill us.
    The solution to much of this problem at least in the U.S. is to call a spade a spade, it’s Muslims/Islam who are the problem. Revoke every visa from immigrants from Muslim countries and deport them, round up every illegal and deport them, Cut off any visas from muslims countries, cut off any refuge status from muslim countries. If that makes me racist or intolerant or an isolationist, well frankly I don’t care. I just wish we had a country that was racist, intolerant and isolationist if it meant they’d protect Americans.

    • waltherppk says:

      Um hmmm, and I would not be so kind as Sharon saying ever so politely we have a “lawless” government….when it is more to the point of fact we have a crime cartel operating under “color of authority” as a government while it actually is no legitimate government…but is a collection of gangsters and subversives, understanding the term “lawless” is a mild term for such thugs, and yes murderers. They are the ultimate “white collar criminals” who delegate their dirty work including “wet work” and “extreme prejudice” type of “operations” that are no different from what kind of stuff any organized crime cartel would do, and they do their dirt deeds under a departmental letter head which makes it “look official” as somehow being “legal and proper” when that is a scam.
      The “official seal” on a death warrant for a wrongly convicted man is no less cold blooded murder than that done by any mugger in an alley, and likewise for any corrupt processes of government where thugs are the administers of “due process” which is an obfuscation of the fact of what is truly occurring. Not all “public servants” are corrupt but certainly enough of them are that it makes the rest of them look bad. And people are rightly asking who in the hell is minding the store.

        • waltherppk says:

          Global caliphate operative mole embedded in government….like Obama. Another candidate for extreme prejudice. What goes around comes around.

          • Jane106 says:

            Ah, I just LOVE a good conspiracy story like the Holocaust never happened, man did not walk on the moon, and there are little green men housed in Area 51…what a great country we live in to be able to invent all these wonderful imaginative stories.

            • waltherppk says:

              I have seen some of these conspiracy stories underway. Smack talking raghead thugs act like they think islam is the only religion for a proper thug. The mafia and the rastifarians and assassins didn’t get the memo.

    • Jane106 says:

      Hi, Michelle, after we deport all the Muslims, what do we do about these people?

  9. Chip Bennett says:


    The question is: how many, and how high up the chain (where the lowest level is Eric Holder)?

    • PatriotUSA says:

      D.C. would be empty and this would be a fine thing. We are going to have to start over. Sooner is better but this country is going to take the long and bloody road, I fear. I pray I am in grave error here.

    • waltherppk says:

      This kind of crap comes right from the oval office. Just like a whole lot of other crap.

  10. John Galt says:

    First of all, the “public safety exception” is just a pretext for a thorough interrogation. I read the “public safety exception” case law last night, after listening to Dershowitz mention that it didn’t apply to this situation. I agree. When you have a suspect disarmed, strip searched, handcuffed to a hospital bed, intubated there is no public safety hazard beyond maybe some limited questioning like “are there more bombs” and “do you have any accomplices”. The big public safety exception supreme court case involved a finding the suspect’s shoulder holster empty and asking one question “where is the gun” and the response “the gun is over there”.

    So FBI was using a bogus “public safety exception” to justify extended interrogation. The FBI undoubtedly knows this. So why did they conduct a pretextural interrogation? Because they already have enough evidence to convict the defendant independently of his statements. The penalty is merely exclusion, the defendant’s pre-Miranda statements can’t be used against him. They can, however, be used against others. Others such as radicals in the local Boston Muslim community. With benefit of Sundance’s disclosure about the muslim leanings of the judge, and keeping in mind that Holder previously quashed the Holyland co-conspirator prosecution in Dallas and later stonewalled Congressional investigation of the matter, it all becomes clear.

    Quote from State v. Baum, a 2009 NJ state supreme court case:

    As to the narrow issue before this Court, however, an analysis of our own protection against self-incrimination yields the same conclusion as that announced by the courts that have interpreted the Fifth Amendment.   As with the Miranda warnings, the purpose advanced by our statute and rule is to protect the individual’s right against self-incrimination rather than to advance the goals of another who tries to claim the benefit of that purely personal right. Were we to part company with the federal courts on this issue and allow defendant to vicariously assert Baum’s right against self-incrimination, we would adopt an approach that would, in effect, read Miranda in a manner so inconsistent with the clear guidance of our federal counterparts as to be inappropriate.   As we have recognized, the United States Supreme Court “has advised against extending Miranda unless the holding ‘is in harmony with Miranda’s underlying principles.’ ”  State v. Boretsky, 186 N.J. 271, 278, 894 A.2d 659 (2006) (quoting Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707, 717, 99 S.Ct. 2560, 2568, 61 L.Ed.2d 197, 207 (1979)).

     We see no basis in this record on which to expand the protections against self-incrimination so as to permit a third party, such as defendant, to assert a violation vicariously.   Therefore, we conclude that, to the extent that defendant’s suppression motion was based on a claimed violation of Baum’s right against self-incrimination, it should have been denied.

    • howie says:

      Lets face it. IMO elements inside DOJ, the WH, and the DNC are corrupted. This corruption extends to their media based operatives. Connecting the dots is not that hard. Rooting out the corruption is. The Foxes are guarding the Henhouse.

    • BertDilbert says:

      Yeah they were abusing the Miranda from the start. There was no need to announce they were waiving the right in the first place, so it was political to begin with. Threats to national security are probably bogus claims as well. This was unfunded terrorism at best. Fireworks, BB’s and nails cannot be played off as national security or we are in big trouble.

      • mspencer50 says:

        Just in case you forget the context of why they mentioned anything about the “public safety exception”, one of the (presumably) reporters present when officials announced they had terrorist #2 in custody asked the official if they’d read him is Miranda Warning. It was NOT something the officials volunteered until they were questioned about it.

        Incidentally, the correct term is Miranda Warning and NOT Miranda Rights. The Miranda Warning is nothing more than a reminder to the person being arrested that they have 5th Amendments Rights against self-incrimination. And you are covered by that amendment whether you’ve been read the Miranda Warning or not.

        In fact, you’re perfectly free to carry an attorney with you everywhere you go in life to protect you from saying something to others that might be self-incriminating. It’s just that it would be quite an expensive approach to covering the fact you have no ability to filter the things you might say in the course of a day… LOL!

    • waltherppk says:

      The total purpose of Miranda is a countermeasure against COERCED “false confessions” being gotten by means of threats or torture……period….end of story on Miranda. The lengthy and plain language explanation of Miranda describes circumstances of what have been “alleged confessions” that were extracted under duress or reported by hearsay exception “police narratives” memorializing “alleged confessions” that were not tape recorded or videotaped, which are basically “confessions” manufactured by police as the outcomes of interrogations where all “suspects” are somehow persuaded to “admit their crimes” just like magic when subjected to “private questioning” by investigators in the “interrogation rooms” or “interview rooms” behind closed doors at the station house. Miranda casts a discerning eye at the circumstances to examine if the alleged “voluntariness” of a “cooperating witness” or a “suspect” actually exists …..or if police are making up a story as they go, where whatever the police allege has been an admission can then be substituted for a written confession in cases where a “suspect” has not been quite that “cooperative”.
      Of course Miranda can extend to those cases where a written confession has also been extracted but more generally it applies to those cases where police are simply making up a story that a suspect has admitted a crime, even though no such admission ever occurred. The biggest reason for a lawyer to be present at an interrogation is to serve as a witness to what may be alleged to be admitted orally in some unrecorded statement under circumstances where cops can otherwise claim that a suspect has fessed up somehow but just didn’t have the fortitude to actually provide a signed confession, and the cops wouldn’t you know it just forgot to tape record any of what alleged oral confession was made. Miranda is an extension of “rules of evidence” meant to discourage dishonest cops from making up stories about suspects who allegedly admit things that were never admitted, to encourage cops to get written releases and to tape record interrogations and not to play games with police authored “narratives” which summarize the results of interrogations where cops “invent confessions” for likely suspects. Cops always could and still can interrogate the hell out of a suspect or someone whose statements are not even needed to secure a conviction, without being concerned about Miranda. Miranda is not needed to somehow make an arrest “official” nor is any Miranda warning any prerequisite to interrogation prearrest or post arrest, with the only caveat being that those “unwarned statements” cannot be used against the accused because they will be subject to a “legal presumption” under Miranda that such statements were coerced ( with the inference understood ) that such alleged “admissions” which are almost always conveniently unrecorded, were simply invented whole cloth by the police. The FBI assuredly had digital tape recorders running while they were asking questions, and no reliance was being placed upon using those tapes as evidence at any future trial of the accused … Miranda is quite irrelevant. It is a total red herring being advanced by “political interests” as an EXCUSE for sabotaging an interrogation of a terrorist it was desired should STOP TALKING to the FBI. There was ZERO legal or security interest and there was ZERO “civil rights” issue involved here.

      • doodahdaze says:

        All interrogation should be videotaped. In this case the DOJ sent in a Muslim Judge for some reason. It may not be that certain people do not want him to talk. If so they will negotiate a plea bargain.

        • waltherppk says:

          Not only should all interrogation be videotaped, any unwarned statements made absent the signing of a “volntariness” affirmation and attesting to the accuracy of the written summary attached should be admissible as “evidence” in the form of unsubstantiated “police narratives” that allege what has been the substance of unrecorded oral statements witnessed only by police. That kind of investigative information ought to never be put before a jury, because cops make up stories with predictable regularity that make false representations about what they have allegedly been told “off the record”. When statements are made off the record, they should not go “on the record” as “second hand” recollections of the police who all have a memory problem that colors their recollections about what they have heard. The fifth amendment is made subject to great efforts to be rendered moot by the scheme where cops use the “2-man rule” where one cop lies and a second cop swears to it about something they allegedly heard and this is a “hearsay exception” that is used every day to nullify the fifth amendment. Nobody needs to ever confess to anything, except to save police the trouble of forming a team to confess for them, making the fifth amendment moot, the same as schemes have been devised to nullify the effect of other enumerated rights that makes the entire bill of rights moot. Whatever actual rights you end up having are only what rights the man with the gun says you have. That’s a brutal simple fact of life that only stupid people don’t understand.

  11. cali says:

    The purpose for this action was simply to silence this man which, I believe they hoped would not survive.
    There are more implications and connections to be sure, they do not want this man to expose what really took place; besides look closely at the timeline of questioning – he was in critical condition and, talking? Are they really so sure of themselves thinking we are that stupid?

    • ftsk420 says:

      No doubt he wasn’t supposed to survive they tried taking him out when he was in the boat and failed just like they failed to do it early on in the morning shootout.

    • yadent says:

      I have to agree with ya on this. After all, wasn’t it the FBI along with local law enforcement that claimed they were in a firefight with the boat suspect when the suspect turned out to be unarmed? Wasn’t it the FBI along with local LE that claimed the suspect’s neck wound was a result of a self-inflicted gunshot from said nonexeisent weapon? Wasn’t it the FBI along with local LE, after having shredded local resident’s 4th and 5th Amendment rights, essentially told local residents that they couldn’t find a supposed heavily armed and dangerous suspect, were tired of looking so, God’s-speed, good luck, call 911 if you see anything, we are taking our well protected butts outta here? Wasn’t it the FBI who released photos of the Boston bombing suspects and asked for the public’s help in ID’ing and locating them when the FBI had known about the bomber brothers since at least 2011, possibly since 2009? DC is full of liars, from top to bottom. It wouldn’t surprise me in the least that it was the FBI who called in the judge to stop said suspect from talking. I trust NO ONE in Wasington…….

  12. Jane106 says:

    This article states that she was a Clinton appointee. WRONG. in 1990, President George HWBush (41) was in office. Clinton did take office until 1993.

  13. popeye's spinach brand says:

    Jaktsar thinks he’s safe now. The best he could have done was spill the beans asap. He’s now caught up in a hornet’s nest under the auspices of BO/EH. He’ll get the death penalty. They’ll say he was a lone wolf.

    • auscitizenmom says:

      Nah. They won’t even make Hasan cut his beard.

      • waltherppk says:

        That would be “religious discrimination” to make him cut his beard and it would likely be claimed to be cruel and unusual “punishment” too. What about being able to pass inspection ……are the rules for being clean shaven and having a short haircut also being “waived” ….while the monthly pay for such a worthless murdering traitorous POS is continued? I think they should take the scumbag Hasaan out to the yard twice a day, every morning at sunrise, and every day at sundown for “firing squad practice” and tie that POS to a post in front of a wall with targets on the wall a couple of feet to the side of each of his ears…….you know just to make sure that when his “magic moment” arrives that the skill of the shooters will be acceptably mil spec. If there should be desired some respect to be shown his religious persuasion, then on Sundays forego the firing squad practice and have him stand beside the trap door on a gallows while they do “rope tests” using 200 pound sandbags. Do the routine like they do the watch at the tomb of the unknown, never fail rain or shine ……even if they have to duct tape Hasaan into ceremonial position to complete each “practice”. He can have his lawyer with him at each “duty” assignment.

        • auscitizenmom says:

          Walther, I like your thinking. :)

        • texan59 says:

          Mr. Hasan did not exercise his “right” to religious freedom with regard to his beard while on active duty. He is still a member of Uncle Sam’s army and I was unaware that just because you are in the legal system of said army, that you get to have that jailhouse conversion privilege. IMHO, his ruse has been nothing but an annoying stall furthering his intent to pke his finger into the eye of this country. I say we should send him to Leavenworth after trial and put him in general population. We wouldn’t have to waste a bullet. You can bet Big Sis wouldn’t let the army have any of hers.

  14. rovatek says:

    I think we should revoke his citizenship since it was likely fraudulently obtained.
    Then throw his rear in some dark hole till we get good and ready to execute him.

  15. saltwater says:

    If Eric Holder is an attorney general, then I”m a Mau-Mau fighter pilot!!! More of Ben Ghazi?

  16. man how will justice ever be served properly when we have a doj thats so corrupt and protects creeps like this. yet someone who downloads a bootleg movie gets slammed into prison for 25 years this guy will probably get off and deported

  17. michellc says:

    Okay this is not about the judge, but it ties into it. Just read on IOW that FOX is reporting they believe there was a 3rd bomber. I agree with BFH if it turns out to be the Saudi student, the Obamas should be tried for treason.

  18. In addition to michellec’s link:

    AoSHQ. and some excellent (if obvious) questions and points by ace.

    • taqiyyologist says:

      Q: Can you use a cell-phone as a RC controller?

      I know the newer ones have RF-emitters, which can be used to control your car stereos and your televisions, but what about RC cars, planes, helos and, say, detonators?

      If it is possible, guess whose phone won’t get examined?

      Gotta love the Saudis. And I mean, you gotta. As in, you have no choice.

  19. L Lancer says:

    Clinton couldn’t have appointed her as he was elected in November 1990 and wasn’t sworn in until 1991.

    • sundance says:

      Please look at her resume – it’s in the embedd pdf. She was appointed as district court judge in 1998. By Bill Clinton. Thanks.

      • Jane106 says:


        George H. W. Bush is an American politician who served as the 41st President of the United States from 1989 to 1993

        William Jefferson “Bill” Clinton is an American politician who served as the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001.

        Bowler, Marianne B.
        Born 1947 in Boston, MA

        Federal Judicial Service
        Magistrate Judge, U. S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
        First appointed to the Court May 7, 1990, former Chief Magistrate Judge.

  20. Michael Spencer says:

    What exactly don’t people understand about the Miranda Warning? All it amounts to is a warning to you that you about your 5th Amendment Rights which state that you have the right to not incriminate yourself, and that you have the right to an attorney to help you with that. The whole issue of the Miranda Warning didn’t even arise until 1966. The courts determined in their “magnificent wisdom” that American citizens must be too stupid to know their 5th Amendment Rights and so they developed common language (known as the Miranda Warning) which became a part of every police force as well as all movies and television shows which portrayed an arrest.

    The point is that you have that 5th Amendment Right against self-incrimination whether anyone reads the Miranda Warning to you or not! The Miranda Warning doesn’t give you any special rights or privileges at all! The only thing it does is restrict law enforcement from using any answers you provide against you in a court of law between the time you are charged/arrested and when they read you the Miranda Warning.

    Law enforcement can continue asking you all manner of questions A) prior to you being charged/arrested, B) after you’ve been charged and arrested but before you’ve been read the Miranda Warning, AND C) after you’ve been read the Miranda Warning. They simply can’t use any of the answers you provide in timeframe B) in the case against you in a court of law.

    Independent of the Miranda Warning, you retain your 5th Amendment Rights throughout the whole process: during A), B), AND C).

    The whole 48 hour limit for the “public safety exception” is a huge myth. Nowhere in the law is the “public safety exception” limited to 48 hours (or any other time frame).

    Since fugitive terrorist #2 was a US citizen, he is (whether we like it or not) entitled to due process. That means we can’t hold him in custody forever without charging him with a crime. Had we regarded him as an “enemy cobatant”, we could have held him until the end of the conflict (assuming that time will ever arrive!) without charging him.

    Technically speaking, he was not being held in custody while he was in the hospital. Due to his many injuries, he simply wasn’t able to leave the hospital. Law enforcement was there round the clock guarding him… but it was NOT to keep him there, it was to keep others (including those with “less than honorable intent”) from reaching him. Law enforcement did not actually need to take him into custody at the hospital until such time as he had recovered enough to leave there… and it appeared that was going to be a very long time.

    However, Obama made the decision to NOT charge him as an “enemy combatant” which meant he’d be travelling through normal criminal court proceedings (and rules and guidelines).

    And the president is the ONLY one who can reverse that decision and declare him to be an “enemy combatant” which removes a large number of his rights.

    Law enforcement already has enough evidence against him to proceed with their case against him tomorrow if they wished and secure a conviction as well as the death penalty. They don’t need any additional answers from him to seal their case against him.

    However, what they would like is to ask him questions to help them identify other co-conspirators and any other information he has about their organization, where they were receiving their financing, help, and support to both prevent other similar attacks and also to track down and apprehend anyone else involved before this all happened again.

    It’s a myth (albeit a popular one!) that the government needed to promptly barge in and read him his Miranda Warning (causing his mouth to clamp shut with any further helpful information to investigators). Certainly, it would need to eventually need to be read to him, just not that soon. There is no prescribed timeframe for it.

  21. bob e says:

    thanks sundance…perfection. round & round it goes..this judge looks fearsome.

  22. theebl says: It is not conclusive what motivated Magistrate Bowler to do what she did, but I do not trust Eric Holder at all. Holder does not have any control over a federal magistrate judge, but he certainly has potential political influence over her. So it is a legitimate question to ask and look into.

  23. “… Let all things be done decently and in order …”. — 1 Corinthians 14:40

    “.. 1.0 No Public Official may act in an UNLAWFUL MANNER To IMPEDE or SUBVERT a Lawful Investigation & UNDERMINE such Lawful Investigation that is undertaken to PRESERVE The Peace & Security of The Nation.

    2.0 State Machinery is held in Public Trust by Public Officials on behalf of The Nation To protect The Peace & Security of The Nation.

    3.0 Those who BETRAY The Trust of The Nation by ABUSING Their Public Office are not ABOVE The Law and may be INVESTIGATED for ABUSE of OFFICE.

    4.0 Any Public Official who BETRAYS The Trust of The Nation by ABUSING Their Public Office Forfeits their Legal Right to hold such Public Office

    4.1 No Public Official should BETRAY The Trust of The Nation by ABUSING Their Public Office to IMPEDE or SUBVERT a Legal & Lawful Investigation.

    5.0 The Peace & Security of The Nation should be of PARAMOUNT IMPORTANCE to all persons occupying all Legal & Lawful Offices of The Nation.

    6.0 A LAWFUL Investigation To Protect The Peace & Security of The Nation that is IMPEDED or SUBVERTED by any person cannot be FAIR & TRANSPARENT

    7.0 To Remain TRANSPARENT A LAWFUL Investigation To Protect The Peace & Security of The Nation should not be IMPEDED or SUBVERTED by any person

    8.0 State Machinery is ABUSED when it is “USED” To provide PROTECTION against PROSECUTION to THOSE who have committed senseless acts of violence

    8.1 State Machinery is ABUSED when it is “USED” To IMPEDE or STOP or SUBVERT a Lawful Investigation To Protect The Peace & Security of a Nation.

    9.0 No person, No Judge, No Prosecutor, No Politician, No Priest, No Bishop, No Citizen, No enemy, No Friend etc is Above The law of The Land.

    9.1 No one is Above The Recognised Law of The Land. Those who BREAK The Law must suffer The Full PENALTY of Breaking The Laws of The Land.

    10.0 The Peace & Security of The Nation is More Important Than any person that behaves as if the Law cannot touch them :There are No UNTOUCHABLES

    10.1 Those who INTERFERE with a Lawful Investigation to Protect The Peace & Security of The Nation are NOT above The Law & may be Investigated.

    10.2 Any person who INTERFERES with a Lawful Investigation to Protect The Peace & Security of The Nation is GUILTY of an OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

    11.0 State Machinery is there to Serve & Protect The Greater Good of all Peace Loving Citizens who have the Right To Live in Peace & Security.

    12.0 State Machinery should never be USED or ABUSED for Selfish Purposes by those who TEMPORARILY OCCUPY a Position of High Trust or High Office…”.

  24. Pingback: Judge Who Ended Interrogation Of Boston Bomber Without DOJ Knowledge Linked To Muslim Brotherhood, Muslim Countries

  25. Pingback: Inhofe: President’s Misguided Rush to Criminalize Terrorist Investigations Comes at Expense of National Security | Logan County OK GOP

  26. Pingback: Boston 's Judge Marianne Prematurely Ends Interrogation of Boston Bomber ~ Video ~ Linked to Muslim Brotherhood — Act For America Omaha Chapter

  27. Pingback: SHOCK: Judge Who Ended Interrogation Of Boston Bomber Linked To Muslim Brotherhood - ALIPAC


  29. Pingback: The Tsarnaev Miranda – Who Exactly is Judge Marianne Bowler ? Who Directed Her, and Why?…. [We have her CURRICULUM VITAE Embedded] | 4frespeech

  30. charlotta says:

    Judge Marianne Bowler is amongst the list of judges in Massachussets.


  31. charlotta says:

    Michael Boudin, Kathy Boudins older brother also a judge on the Massachussets circuit WITH MARIANNE BOWLER. Coincidence????? I think not. There are no coincidences with terrorists. Now I wonder if Bowler is married to a MUSLIM? Can’t find out who she is married to but am looking

    Holder sent Bowler to mirandize Dzhokar and now the 3 NEW SUSPECTS AS WELL. The plot thickens. This whole cabal are up to their necks with terrorists

  32. Pingback: Euroislam » Wokół Bostonu: krytyka, niejasności, dziwne działania władz

  33. Pingback: Chicago: Fed judge reverses ruling that would have released Muslim terror suspect | Creeping Sharia

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s