Hillary Clinton Tells House Committee: “I Did Not Say That It Was About The Video For Libya”…. “What Difference Does It Make”….

benghazi-liars-banner.jpg

undefinedWASHINGTON DC – Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testified at the House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing, answering questions on the attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-IL) pressed her on the anti-Islamic video that was originally blamed for the attack. “When you briefed us, you said unequivocally this was a result of a video and I remember in fact you got pretty upset about it when somebody suggested this was a terrorist attack.”

Clinton said, “I did not say … that it was about the video for Libya, it certainly was for many of the other places where we were watching these disturbances.”  (link)

She is a LIAR – PERIOD  She blamed the video the very next day. and beyond:

“What difference does it make”?

Benghazi bathroomambassador chris stevens collar bone injury

ambassador chris stevens collar bone injury

About these ads
This entry was posted in Benghazi-Gate, CIA, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Islam, media bias, North Africa, Obama re-election, Political correctness/cultural marxism, Sept 11, Susan Rice, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, United Nations, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Hillary Clinton Tells House Committee: “I Did Not Say That It Was About The Video For Libya”…. “What Difference Does It Make”….

  1. bob e says:

    descent into irrelevance..

    Like

    • cajunkelly says:

      This….b…witch should be FORCED to look at that photo and the one of the blood soaked urinal every day for the rest of her miserable lying filthy prog life.

      Like

  2. cajunkelly says:

    Add her to this list:

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1859513_1859526_1859515,00.html

    Top Ten Unfortunate Political One Liners

    Bill’s there: I did not have sexual relations with that woman.

    Like

  3. Eric says:

    I never thought people could be so blind but when you have the evidence right in front of you, idiots still go Derp Herp and deny the facts.

    Like

  4. west1890 says:

    I hereby nominate Billarysnake for the ‘Sarah Heartburn 2013 Feigned Outrage Award’.

    Like

  5. janc1955 says:

    I watched large portions of this mess today, but I never heard anyone ask Clinton this question. Given all the preliminary information she and many others had about the dangerous situation in Libya, why, when their fears were finally realized on September 11, 2012 (not an irrelevant date, obviously), their immediate position was that some random “disgusting” and “anti-Islam” video by a U.S. filmmaker had prompted the attack. How did they decide immediately that it was some random response to some random video and not the very planned, coordinated terrorist attack that had been feared, and in fact EXPECTED, for quite some time? To me, the answer is clear. It was spin, pure and simple, for political reasons and for ideological reasons. It is so incredibly offensive to me that the first thing Washington leadership does is turn around and point fingers inside their own country, placing blame for the death of 4 Americans on AMERICANS. Unless I missed it, no one asked Clinton why a random video and not the terrorist attack that had been ANTICIPATED.

    Like

  6. michellc says:

    She lied under oath, but what does it matter when she won’t be charged for lying under oath? Laws are only for us little people.

    Like

  7. LeChat says:

    From cattle futures to the cover-up at Benghazi, nobody will ever lay a glove on Hillary. The system is corrupt to the point that its very survival is in doubt.

    Like

  8. Josh says:

    The ultimate question I believe is: What did Ambassador Stevens know that they wanted him dead?
    His family and trusted friends must know something…

    Like

  9. stellap says:

    It appears that she also lied about the cables, or so says Elliott Abrams, and he ought to know:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/338607/hillary-clintons-management-failure-elliott-abrams#

    Like

    • ctdar says:

      Equate it to “the dog ate my homework”….if Clinton couldnt do her job because she had to travel so many millions of miles to visit hundreds of countries than she was obviously unqualified to be Secretary of State.

      Like

  10. WeeWeed says:

    “What difference does it make??”

    Like

  11. ctdar says:

    Clinton tearful script seem familiar?

    Campaign 2008

    Benghazi 2013

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s