Section 90.404(1)(b) allows evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim of a crime to be offered by an accused; or by the prosecution to rebut the trait; or evidence of a character trait of peacefulness of the victim offered by the prosecution in a homicide case to rebut evidence that the victim was the aggressor. (more…)
Use this thread as an open thread just for Zimmerman Case stuff. A place to just dump, collect, or discuss general information about the Trayvon Martin VS George Zimmerman Case.
REMINDER – Please WATCH THE TONE and CONTENT of Commentary. Please be respectful, courteous and considerate of other readers and contributors. Please avoid hatespeak, angry rhetoric, vulgarity, personal attacks and condescension. If you wish to engage in vitriolic, racist, or bitter angry rhetoric, there are alternative sites on the internet more than welcoming to such considerations. But not here. Thank You.
Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. THY WILL BE DONE, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but DELIVER US FROM EVIL.
For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, forever and ever. Amen †
This is unreal. Seriously, unreal. Everytime I think the Obama administration cannot go any lower on the intellectually honest scale they find new ways to lower the bar. There is no longer daylight visible between the bar and the dirt.
WASHINGTON (AP) — The State Department said Tuesday it never concluded that the consulate attack in Libya stemmed from protests over an American-made video ridiculing Islam, raising further questions about why the Obama administration used that explanation for more than a week after assailants killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans. (it goes on)
Stop – Wait… wha? The State Dept never concluded the attack was from protests? Huh?
(more…)
Massive unemployment, an economy contracting, exploding deficits, the flag of al-Qaeda being flown over U.S. embassies, and U.S. Ambassadors arriving home in coffins.
What is President Obama focused on?
Is it really any wonder why he, and his like-minded followers are circling the drain?
Meanwhile The Obama Campaign is focused on Big Bird….
The State Department is coming under more scrutiny ahead of anticipated hearings scheduled for tomorrow. Request for additional security fell on deaf ears, and despite State Dept claims there were no protests in front of the consulate in Benghazi. The Democrats are petrified of the impact on the election, desperate to protect President Obama, and are attempting rabid obfuscation:
The Congressional Hearing will be streamed live tomorrow at noon on the web – AVAILABLE HERE
(Reuters) – A U.S. security officer formerly stationed in Libya has told lawmakers he sent two cables to the State Department requesting more security agents for the American mission in Benghazi but received no response.
The officer, Eric Nordstrom, also said that a State Department official, Charlene Lamb, wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi “artificially low,” according to a memo summarizing his comments that was obtained by Reuters. (more…)
This is good for a chuckle. Remember our discussion thread about the Pro-Obama SuperPac pulling out of Ohio? Well, the public polling is confirming why. Mitt Romney winning in Ohio.
Keep in mind, this poll is D+9 – Giving 9% turnout advantage to Obama and yet Romney still wins the poll.
OHIO – The good news in today’s ARG poll of Ohio is not that Romney’s leading 48-47%, it’s that the party ID breakdown doesn’t reflect anything nearing reality, D+9. There’s just no way Democrats will enjoy a nine-point turnout advantage over Romney in Ohio. But in order to believe Romney’s only up by one, that’s exactly what you have to assume. […]
The poll also shows Romney is also winning Independents by a full 20 points, 57-37%.
Romney’s winning men by four points, 50-46%, and only losing women by three, 48-45%. (more)
Obviously Benjamin Crump does not realize this statement directly contradicts the previous public assertions by his clients Tracy Martin and Sybrina Fulton. Or maybe he does, and he is intentionally tormenting his team with his insufferable ineptitude.
Also, considering this essentially boils down to a physical confrontation between a Six Foot two-inch 160 lb 17-year-old, Trayvon Martin, and a Five Foot seven-inch 170 lb 28-year-old, George Zimmerman, how can Benjamin Crump think the only relevent aspect is the behavioral psychology of only one party ? (more…)
Just go read THIS. I’m not smart enough to determine the value or importance.
Let me know what you think. Thanks.
