Trump Wins – Supreme Court Reinstates President Trump VISA Travel and Immigration Ban – (Full Ruling pdf)…

So much winning. The Supreme Court is letting a version of the Trump administration ban on travel from six mostly Muslim countries to take effect, a victory for President Donald Trump. In the decision to lift the stay the court outlined temporary limits to the ban based on status.

The court said Monday the ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen could be enforced as long as they lack a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.” The justices will hear arguments in the case in October. President Trump said last week the immigration and travel restrictions would take effect 72 hours after being cleared by courts.

#1: Agree to hear case:

[W]e grant both of the Government’s petitions for certiorari and consolidate the cases for argument.

#2: Agree to allow ban to continue:

We grant the Government’s applications to stay the injunctions, to the extent the injunctions prevent enforcement of §2(c) with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.

Thomas, Alito and Gorsuch said they would have let the complete bans take effect without any limits.

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, said the government has shown it is likely to succeed on the merits of the case, and that it will suffer irreparable harm with any interference. Thomas said the government’s interest in preserving national security outweighs any hardship to people denied entry into the country.

Here’s the ruling:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, Dept Of Justice, DHS, Election 2016, Election 2017, Election 2018, Illegal Aliens, media bias, President Trump, Supreme Court, Terrorist Attacks, Travel, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

419 Responses to Trump Wins – Supreme Court Reinstates President Trump VISA Travel and Immigration Ban – (Full Ruling pdf)…

  1. Troublemaker10 says:

    How come there’s no video anywhere of “cryin’ Chuck” tears over this?

    Like

  2. yzest5121 says:

    Please read the dissenting opinion which should be the majority opinion. Once again appellate judges don’t get the trial court problems they create by out-of-the-blue creating a new standard for evaluating something. “Bona fide” connection has no precedent or prior analysis and you should have heard the left like NPR speculating what constitutes a bona fide connection, with some almost suggesting that having once farted in airport on US soil was sufficient “bona fide” connection . . . the raft of claims will start the day the ban goes into effect.

    Like

  3. br howell says:

    Nations are defined by borders and laws.
    The previous administration respected neither.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s