Yesterday Hillary Clinton was campaigning in Miami, later she attended a fundraiser in Miami Beach. At Clinton’s rally several hundred enthusiastic supporters were reported in attendance.
Today, literally less than a few miles north, Donald Trump holds his campaign rally in the BB&T Center, Sunrise FL, home to the Florida Panthers. Thousands of enthusiastic supporters are in attendance:
This is a continual pattern that appears to be entirely by design. Trump is shadow-campaigning Clinton to draw a contrast to the visible support and work around the media.
The Main Stream Media is a filter-block to the Trump campaigning. The “Media Polls” are entirely structured to give a false impression. [ Not all the polls, the “media polls“ ].
Think about this statement carefully:
If you take away the “Media Polls” what evidence exists that Hillary Clinton is even remotely close to a similar level of support in this election?
Shadow campaigning is what allows Trump to highlight the contrast; not only the optics, but also the level of support within both campaigns.
If the “Media Polls” were accurate, then both attendees to the same exact neighborhood would hold a similar attendance level.
Actually, Clinton should be out-drawing Trump by 10 – 15% (at least occasionally) if the media polling were factual. She’s not, because the “media polling” is no more accurate than the bias exhibited in the print and broadcast presentations by the same media outlets:
Donald #Trump arrives at the arena. Crowd chants "USA, USA" pic.twitter.com/rujQJKurJP
— Rajini Vaidyanathan (@BBCRajiniV) August 11, 2016
Monday evening Hillary Clinton campaigned in Kissimee Florida; you might remember the rally attended by Orlando terrorist’s father Seddique Mateen. Tomorrow, Donald Trump is going to the exact same Kissimee neighborhood, again – shadow campaigning, only Trump is using The Silver Spurs Arena.
[Kissimee Florida is not a large town – although it’s a metro suburb of Orlando.]
However, you’ll note how the media is entirely ignoring the continual comparative optics. American corporate media have their narrative, their media polling, and they are entirely sticking to the promotion of that reality.
When we say “media polling” we are specifically referencing: CNN/ORC (Turner), ABC (Disney), New York Times (Carlos Slim), CBS (David Rhodes), NBC (Mark Murray), Wall Street Journal (Rupert Murdoch), FOX News (Daron Shaw), WaPo (Jeff Bezos), Reuters, and the fellowship of Monmouth Polling (Patrick Murray).
Each of these Wall Street media outlets, or organizations that is paid by Wall Street media outlets, are generating polling that is no different in ideological intent to the broadcasts and journalism they espouse on a daily basis. They each have a vested interest in the creation and promotion of false data to support Clinton.
Again, if you remove these specific media polls from the bloodstream of U.S. political discussion what evidence exists that Hillary Clinton is even remotely viable as a presidential candidate? Factually, very little evidence exists.
That’s not to say that some polling by Quinnipiac or Rasmussen, if the methodology and samples are appropriately distributed, are not correct – they very well can be. Heck, even PPP polling who intentionally describe themselves as left-leaning (sample Dems), is more dishonestly accurate than the above “media polls”.
The psychological use of media to construct a false narrative is the heaviest it has ever been. This election is breaking multiple records beyond the candidate factors.
Forcing this visible contrast, between false and reality, appears to be the reason why Team Trump are shadow-following Hillary Clinton and her campaign. Watch the upcoming campaign geography of Hillary Clinton and then follow the campaign geography of Donald Trump and you’ll see the approach.
https://twitter.com/aeronautic1/status/763538885972557824