
She Doth Protest Too Much…
Rand Paul Hammers Hillary Clinton Over Benghazi During Senate Hearing, “I Would Have Relieved You Of Your Post”

She Doth Protest Too Much…
Rand Paul Hammers Hillary Clinton Over Benghazi During Senate Hearing, “I Would Have Relieved You Of Your Post”
People are dead and Ms. Bass is asking Clinton questions about letting contracts in Africa!!!!
Disgusting. The Rose Law Firm debacle should have ended Hilary’s political career.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/arkansas/docs/recs.html
The protective slobbering of some versus the truth seeking of others happens at ALL levels of government. This is hard to listen to.
One only needs to look at how much the Democrat Committee members are having to heap praise on to The Liar, to understand how much they consider this testimony to be dangerous.
There is a massive, intentional coverup afoot. The Dems are desperate to sweeep this under the rug…..
This is one place where I agree that there is a huge coverup going on.
Gop’s are restrained due to the nature of the operation. The coverup is under color of law I would bet.
sundance, if there ever was a blatant example of what is wrong with Washington, D.C., we saw it today. There was so much glad handing and back slapping, I thought I would loose my lunch. “Good job, Hillary. We all think you are fabulous. Nevermind that four Americans were slaughtered on your watch. What a good job you have done.”
We are expected to believe that a commuication from Chris Stevens, in the hottest of the hot spots in the Middle East, requesting additional security, did not make to Hillary’s attention? Yeah, I’m buying that one, along with some ocean front property in Lubbock, Texas. Call it the “Deliberate Deception of Denial” policy, all being pushed by the most deception, non-transparent administration in modern history.
Maybe someone can tell me if Charlene Lamb, who in earlier testimony said she was the one responsible for assigning security to the Bengazi compound, still has a job? If so, why? Whose head will roll for this? Hillary is padding her account for 2016.
Last I heard, Charlene Lamb and three other State Dept. employees did still have jobs. They were put on paid leave for a few weeks, the press reported they were gone, then they quietly returned to work. No one was fired.
I’ve been listening in the background all day, I’ve heard a lot of that didn’t come to my attention, I wasn’t aware of that, I wasn’t involved in the talking points, etc.
The most hilarious thing I’ve heard though is that the terrorists or whatever they call themselves (her words not mine) in Africa have no interest or the ability to attack our homeland.
Today was nothing more for some members of congress to give Clinton a bon voyage party. This q & a session (that only allotted 5 min total per committee member) should have only focused on BENGHAZI. Those members that blamed bush, championed women rights or other selfish political desires should hold their heads in shame. Those 4 brave men that died on THEIR watch deserved so much better.
Disgusting political circus.
I think the House is giving her more of a hard time than the Senate.
Regarding all these cables her Department receives? I would think there would be protocols re: the urgency level of the cable. geeez, even in email you can red flag something. Are all the cables asking for security cause they are under attack, or perceive an attack? Of course not. If so, we are in bad shape. Don’t these people know how to pick up a telephone? Don’t telephones work in 2013? No cellphone with hotline number ready to go? It’s funny tho how through all the communications sent by average joe citizen they can pick out the one that needs immediate attention cause it may involve the life of the president, or some other phoney politician. I bet if it was about her life she would have known about it pronto. I’m just not buying this “do you know how many cables we get” business. Please, spare me. Nobody could buy that argument and why she is going there is beyond me.
Someone please photoshop a big cheeseburger in her hands. Maybe a couple of cigars instead…
Cigars wouldn’t go in her mouth. (sorry it had to be said)
They didn’t in Monica’s, either.
“What difference does it make?”
The entire White House and State Department narrative is based upon lies…lies that the American people knew about two days after the incident occurred. There was no protest and no one watched the movie.
And her crocodile tears about the “flag-draped caskets” was infuriating, as was the sorry performance of the fawning senators thanking her for her service. The thanks she gets for her service is her salary. Rather than waste time with false praise, they should have been grilling her about Benghazi.
You want that too?
“Rather than waste time with false praise…”
Their praise is not false.
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/nbc-news/50564712/#50564712
Adam Kinzinger – from Illinois of all places!
Clinton’s description of “violent extremism” is what exactly?
Let ‘er have it, Wolverines. She said we could and therefore, we will.
OMG, that is downright scary. Wonder how many times Chelsea heard her scream like that. Mommy dearest “I said no wire hangers”
Key notes so far, and I need to review everything better.:
The reason for lower security (no marines) in Benghazi, is there was no “secret” information contained in Benghazi.
Yes and according to Clinton the Congress only allows State Department to hire the cheapest security available.
“The reason for lower security (no marines) in Benghazi, is there was no “secret” information contained in Benghazi.”
By all appearances, Benghazi was nothing more than a storage and way point for the transfer of weapons from Libya to Syria, with assistance from Turkey.
So what were the former SEALs doing there? (rhetorical question) And I guess a U.S. Ambassador doesn’t need a good personal security detail?
In the “hotspot” of Benghazi on anniversary of worst terrorist attack on US citizens in world history.
They are really giving her what for.
SOME are but not enough of them…
? We watching the same thing? I say less than 10% of the members in total today from both committees have asked her any relevant questions with ZERO valued response.
I agree with your analysis, ctdar
my 10% response was re Ottawas comment no confusion on yours Josh
Understood
Is she reading prepared responses? Has she been given their statements and questions prior to the actual hearing?
Yes I believe she had and the woman in the poncho has been feeding her
other info as the hearings have progressed.
Yes, according to Ulstermann’s source, all the questions were provided beforehand.
Mayday, Mayday, Mayday. That is the Secretary of State. #1 contender for the next POTUS. Mayday, Mayday, Mayday.
Committee just cut time from 5 min to 3 for Q&A
Nice, way to get to bottom of Benghazi murders and answer question for those 4 men’s families and our country.
Seriously, why bother with this if they are not going to even TRY.
Why bother with this?
So that, from this time forth and forevermore, when any person living or dead DARES to raise a question about Benghazi, the progs can adopt their most offended posture and tone of voice and say, “On January 23 of 2013, the Secretary of State voluntarily appeared at a Congressional hearing and answered every single question put to her regarding this matter. It has been exhaustively investigated, Mrs. Clinton has addressed the matter, and it is highly insulting that at this late date, you feel you must persist in your witch hunt. You are a cad.”
That’s why.
Yes
and on its face absolutely disgusting these kinds of people are running our Country. Has anybody seen Wee? Maybe she can open up the bar a couple days early?
She should be around in a bit….I’ll stick a note on her branch and see what she thinks…
Thx, tell her I’ll wash the glasses & lock up
Exactly right, Sharon.
Clinton throws out “Boko Haram” like we’ve all heard of it.
What Is Boko Haram?
http://www.usip.org/publications/what-boko-haram
“Boko Haram is an Islamic sect that believes politics in northern Nigeria has been seized by a group of corrupt, false Muslims. It wants to wage a war against them, and the Federal Republic of Nigeria generally, to create a “pure” Islamic state ruled by sharia law.”
“Since August 2011 Boko Haram has planted bombs almost weekly in public or in churches in Nigeria’s northeast. The group has also broadened its targets to include setting fire to schools. In March 2012, some twelve public schools in Maiduguri were burned down during the night, and as many as 10,000 pupils were forced out of education.”
Lots more in the link posted. I’m feeling too sick to continue… “setting fire to schools…”
Al-Shabaab
http://www.cfr.org/somalia/al-shabaab/p18650
“…is an Islamic organization that controls much of southern Somalia, excluding the capital, Mogadishu. It has waged an insurgency against Somalia’s transitional government and its Ethiopian supporters since 2006. Originally the militant wing of the Islamic Courts Union, the group that controlled Somalia prior to the country’s invasion by Ethiopian forces, al-Shabaab leaders have claimed affiliation with al-Qaeda since 2007.”
Clinton said she never blamed the video? She blamed it 3 days after the 9/11 attack during the service when the caskets came back in the hanger.
Oh, now you’re just being picky. (and accurate–but that’s what they consider being picky)
Um, methinks people forget the Hillary and Barack commercial, we paid for, and they ran in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the M.E, apologizing for the U-Tube video. They, State Dept, produced and distributed the apology commercial one week after Benghazi.
Guess none of the congresscritters thought that would have been a rebuttal to that nonsense from Shrillary…..
5 min than cut to 3 is no where near amount of time needed for a serious inquiry/rebuttal into Benghazi. Committee of like minded members should have streamlined pertinent questions in y/n format and if anyone missed getting the question in or answer, it should have the next member pick it up on their time slot.
Good luck on getting their answer back via “written format” from Clinton, like that is going to happen in our lifetime.
I had to run out for a bit during the house testimony, did Issa or Gowdy speak?? If not I wonder why not.
House Foreign Affairs Committee. Issa and Gowdy not on this one, they are on House Oversight Committee.
so they ran the initial Benghazi inquiry because of oversight on the agencies State & DOD.
Wish they had run today’s hearing as well.
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2013/01/23/wapo-and-cbs-reporters-yeah-actually-it-makes-a-difference-hillary/
Check out the quotes that Ed Morrissey has gathered….it’s too late to matter, but at least some are speaking up.
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/01/23/video-us-air-force-airlifting-french-military-into-northern-mali/
Good catch. They are using this “distraction” to their advantage.
Keep an eye on the OTHER hand, people.
you mean the one that is giving tanks to Egypt whose leader has openly expressed his hatred of Israel?
Not to mention the F-16′s.
I watched the entire hearing today and I really was expecting more questions than that big old love fest. What happens now? Will we get to hear her written responses to those who asked, will those anwers even matter. Still seems like nobody is or ever will be held responsible.
I did take note of Hillary copying Obama’s Newtown tears effect.
House Chairman Ed Royce (R-CA) is a worthless piece of dog poo. No substance whatsoever to that House Hearing of any value…. Millions of Americans are pissed off that this opportunity was missed.
After watching that, all I could think was “were doomed”. If these people can’t stand up to known lies spewed by Hillary, then how are they ever going to stand up to defend our rights. They will cower from Obama just as they did with Hillary.
Hillary is just damn glad she didn’t have to submit to Treehouse questioning.
This was just a circling of the political wagons. These politicians, RINO or Democrat, are not going to upset their own applecart by asking hard questions. They have no intention of getting to the bottom of Benghazi. They and Hillary are on the same team: politicians. And politicians stick up for each other to keep the money and power flowing. Sorry to be so cynical, but that’s how I see it.
That’s not being cynical. That’s being in touch with reality.
RON JOHNSON DISCUSSES HIS CLINTON Q&A
Wednesday, Jan 23, 2013
U.S. Senator Ron Johnson discusses the fiery exchange he had with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton earlier today during the congressional testimony about the embassy attack in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Johnson reacts to Clinton’s answers and details the questions he would have liked to ask had he been allotted additional time for Q&A.
[audio at link]
http://www.620wtmj.com/podcasts/talk/charliesykes/188079951.html
According to our old friend Ulsterman, the fix was in when Hilde-beest went to the Senate.
http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/01/23/white-house-insider-hillary-clintons-benghazi-testimony-complete-bullsh-t/
This is DISGUSTING. She also needs to be impeached and convicted and serve time!
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/01/23/John-McCain-Bring-Benghazi-Survivors-to-Capitol-Hill
Ah! So the Senator actually is capable of identifying potentially worthy targets who might, possibly, maybe, actually have some information????? Gee, I’m all impressed. At this rate, along about April 43, 2059 they should be ready to transcribe some specific information about The Murders at Benghazi. Maybe.
Thanks for this information Sharon. One of his important constituents must have got to him because he was pathetic yesterday. Let’s see if he can get them on the Hill! This is what the press should be clamoring for, ,,,David Gregory, Andy Cooper, Pierce Morgan, lol,; where are the witnesses?. Not one sold-out talking head has asked, and if the repubs do, then they say it’s all a repub plot. They have turned into mindless dweebs without an independent thought in their sold-out, shallow heads. As long as Obama says being gay is okay, that’s all they care about, and that is the gist of it! It’s funny that even pretty boy Andy isn’t outraged about Stevens death not being covered, as Stevens was gay himself, just like Andy. Putin has it nailed lately with regard to his recent actions, including imposing a huge ban of public gay activities in Russia. Bravo Putin!
When McCain does actually string words together as he did yesterday in a specifically bold and timely fashion, I just get so frustrated with his apparent inability to function that way during–say–the 2008 campaign? He can’t be depended on to be bold or timely with his truth-telling.
I agree with Putin’s perspective on “public gay activities” but I sure don’t wish on gay Russians the officially sanctioned punishments that Putin probably has in mind for them if they don’t do what he demands: those who openly oppose Putin have a way of ending up dead. Nor would I want American gays (including those who enjoy the Treehouse) to have to live the threatened life that obama would design for them the instant he saw it to be politically advantageous.
What a farce…Senate inquiry was led by Menendez/NJ who remember had an illegal alien sex offender working for him but oh that info wasn’t released til after M was re-elected in November and now released YESTERDAY, yes the day after Clinton testifying, that the FBI is investigating for his prostitution connections with girls as young as 16!!!!
http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/25/emails-show-fbi-investigating-sen-bob-menendez-for-sleeping-with-underage-dominican-prostitutes/
Both the senate & house need clean sweep/extermination of vermin in 2014 elections