Oh My ! – Ann Dunham “Pictures” surface – President Barack Obama’s Mom…..

Not quite reflective of the *cough* Mid-West Kansas family values the Institutional Legacy Media were selling.    The photos were apparently taken at Frank Marshall Davis’s home in Honolulu. The photos reveal an intimate relationship between Obama’s mother and his childhood mentor.  Perhaps, just perhaps, her teenage years in Marxist Schools in Oregon will soon surface?   Ya, never know…..

(from the video) Racy photos of Barack Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, have recently surfaced in vintage fetish and bondage magazines. The photos, taken at Frank Marshall Davis’ house in Honolulu, appeared in Bizarre Life, Exotique, Secret Pleasures, and Battling Babes. They help illustrate the intimate relationship between Dunham and Davis. “My father was from Kenya, he grew up herding goats,” Barack Obama told the cheering crowds. Did Obama build his political career upon a fairy tale? Was Obama misdirecting Americans away from a deeply disturbing family background and a Marxist political foundation?

Obama’s version of his early childhood is false — the family did not split up when the Kenyan Obama went to Harvard as he claimed. In fact, Ann Dunham, took “Barry” to Seattle a few weeks after his birth, in late August 1961, and began studies at the University of Washington, while the Kenyan remained in Hawaii. All evidence points to a “sham” marriage to cover up an illicit affair. Barack Obama began regular visits to Frank Marshall Davis’ house at the age of 10, and Obama refers to Frank Marshall Davis throughout his autobiography as his childhood “mentor.”

About these ads
This entry was posted in Communist, Election 2012, media bias, Obama re-election, Obama Research/Discovery, Socialist, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

96 Responses to Oh My ! – Ann Dunham “Pictures” surface – President Barack Obama’s Mom…..

  1. Sentenza says:

    I which characters in his work of fiction these went into.

  2. Ace says:

    No wonder this guy’s so screwed up. Kind of the same scenario as Charles Manson. Except “Obama” has killed more people.
    If he was an ordinary, decent person, I’d feel real sorry for him. No wonder he doesn’t talk about her much.
    Considering that this was his orientation, does anyone doubt Larry Sinclair’s story now??

  3. Roscoe P. Soultrane says:

    The First Mother/Mater Dei appears to have been a bit of a whore.

  4. ctdar says:

    This is just the “leader” that keeps on giving…wonder what story he is gonna spin today?

  5. Michell says:

    The media usually likes sex stories, I wonder if they’ll pick up on nude photos of Obama’s Mommy? Who am I kidding, Obama will say they’re not his Mother and how dare someone sully his Mother’s memory and the media will blame Conservatives for attacking a dead woman.

  6. kinthenorthwest says:

    So how are they going to spin this its popped up in 2008 but not this many times

  7. Sharon says:

    Now the bad dreams are going to start. :( Fetish. Bondage. POTUS’ mother. Yet another artificial social barrier broken and blasted to smithereens by Teh Won.

  8. Scoots Knuck says:

    I think it’s time to post this little gem once again…
    “The truth is incontrovertible; malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.” ~ Winston Churchill

  9. Sharon says:


    Why is it that the horrible, delusional “right wing” of the citizenry is being vindicated these days, on item after item after item? Guess what??? Turns out there WAS no “nuclear family” from which His Royal Ass sprang. But we knew that, didn’t we? Lies. All lies.

    But those who are willing to be deceived in order to be allowed in HRA’s presence will continue to be deceived. He pimps for them. They pimp for him.

  10. Dawn says:

    I’m somewhat new to this blog (found out about it following the GZ case) so I’m not sure if the link below has already been posted and discussed, but thought I’d go ahead and share it, just in case. The resemblance between Davis and Obama is uncanny!


  11. eah says:

    On the one hand, I don’t think it’s fair to hold the doings of a person’s parents against him. No matter how much I dislike Obama. On the other hand, his background is nothing less than unseemly, and I find it somehow ghastly that a man with such a heritage is President.

    • Chuck says:

      I don’t really care what his Mother did or didn’t do, I just hate being lied to then being ridiculed for having the audacity to mention it.

      • tnwahm says:

        Exactly. I believe that as parents, it’s our responsibility ~our privilege~ to give our children the best possible chance with a loving family; however, our children have individual free will and choice. We all make our own choices. There are countless example of people coming from horrific “families” and still becoming productive and loving citizens.

    • James Crawford says:

      Agreed that the Obama Mama’s prostituting herself (she was taking money to pose nude then having sex with the photographer) doesn’t disqualify him from office. However; these photos that proove that Obama’s narrative is false which only confirms that he has been severely affected psychologically from his unorthodox upbringing. His obvious resentment about not having a normal childhood and parents whom he could respect no doubt explains his unrelenting hostility towards respectable, middle class married people with children who work to support their families rather than live on government hand outs.

  12. howie says:

    Was Davis a KGB agent? I think a lot of KGB were on the loose in Chicago. They were everywhere back then. Now they run the show but there is no Soviet Union. Day late and a dollar short.

  13. Chuck says:

    Obama will once again proclaim that his family is off limits, and he’ll bode no further commentary of them. At which point ISPs will start closing accounts due to TOS violations, and the media will bury all references to the subject just like in 2008.

    It wouldn’t matter if you had signed affidavits from Jesus Christ and the Pope attesting to the authenticity of the information. The media would ignore it, and his liberal supporters would proudly proclaim “so what! He’s the President and there’s nothing you can do about it.. Nana, Nana, Boo Boo!

  14. Krystal says:

    I had read in the past that Marshall may have been his dad, and even the theory that his white grandfather had sired a child by a black woman (O looks a lot like his granddad) and they pretended Anne was the mother and used Obama Sr as the father. Either way – this may be the reason he will not release his original long form certificate, the doctor’s name, hospital etc. Or why the media did not go down to Hawaii and do some vetting as they overdid in Palin’s case up in Alaska. Have any pictures been shown of Anne actually pregnant ?
    All O had to do is be honest and not make up these ridiculous stories about his life. And I am sure DNA would prove whether he is an “obama” or a “marshall”.

    • Dawn Doe says:

      I can definitely see the resemblance between Obama and Ann Dunham. Mostly in the lines around his mouth. You can see it in the video linked in my comment above.

    • garnette says:

      The fact that there are so many theories out there tell me that Obama was such an empty suit in regards to not only his political views (voting present) but also to his true life story. It is sad that there are so many blanks and confusing periods of time with contradictions in what he has said about his life that we still don’t know his life story.

  15. James Crawford says:

    And they dismiss Governor Palin as being unqualified for being VP or POTUS because she is a MILF? (okay, she is being foolish by choosing to be offended by the truth)

    Obama could of course argue thatch has nothing to be ashamed of because his mom looks really good, darn good.

    All joking aside, what in the he’ll were Obama’s grandparents thinking when they allowed their underage daughter to pose for a pornographer?

  16. Guess that means Zero was born in Hawaii, after all. All this time everyone was chasing the birth certificate, chasing for the wrong reason while it was being concealed – for a different reason. Wow.

  17. Ignatius J Donnelly says:

    What was he, 30 something years older than her? Gimme a break.
    Why is this so important to you guys? LOL!

    • Dawn Doe says:

      It goes to credibility and ideology. It shows obama’s true agenda and confirms what many of us have suspected and/or known all along about what he intends to do to this country.

    • Patriot Dreamer says:

      IMO it is important because it shows (yet again) the bias of the lame stream media. They sent a horde of investigators to Alaska trying to find anything negative about Sarah Palin and her family – even making stuff up about her. BHO, on the other hand, they just accepted everything that he said about himself as fact without any effort to objectively investigate whatsoever. The man who is currently occupying the White House was not vetted by the LSM for the voters. He was just given a pass.

  18. Ignatius J Donnelly says:

    The source for this is one Youtube video?

    • mwsomerset says:

      Sure….you really didn’t expect to see anything official now did ya? It doesn’t matter that all these “myths” were debunked in 2008…might as well run it up the flag pole again and see if anybody salutes…apparently some still do. I’ve never seen such disrespect shown to the President during a time of war….very unpatriotic. It seems there are quite a few unhinged amongst us.

      • Sharon says:

        “I’ve never seen such disrespect shown to the President during a time of war….very unpatriotic.”

        Death of a President, the fictional account of the assassination (specifically) of George W. Bush, was filmed in 2006 and broadcast in 2008. It probably was done with the greatest respect, since that was during a time of war.

        Has anyone heard how the fictional account of the assassination of the current POTUS is coming along? If it’s going to open while he’s still in office, they’d better step on it.

      • Menagerie says:

        You slept through Bush’s last term and the way he was treated then? Welcome back to the world, Rip van Winkle.

        • Aussie says:

          I second that comment…. indeed these people had to have slept through the disgusting manner in which GWB was treated.

      • DizzyMissL says:

        So, are you saying that is not his mom?

      • garnette says:

        F the President was one of the most degrading bumper stickers I have seen. But, it was against Bush so it doesn’t count, right? I love when I hear comments being said that we should call Obama President. What gets me is that those that say that are the same that wouldn’t show Bush the same respect. Of course, considering how Obama has dressed and acted in the White House, I don’t think he shows the office that much respect.

        • WeeWeed says:

          When I think of Him in the WH, I think of feet on OUR furniture. Total disrespect for the office, the Home, and the People who support/pay His way in the world right now. He despises us all.

        • Aussie says:

          I will stick to calling him stupid and a number of other names. The man does not deserve my respect… not after his outburst against the Daily Caller journalist.

      • texan59 says:

        For IJD and mws – why is it always conjecture and speculation and slandering when things like this are brought up against a D, but when Dubya was POTUS you all KNEW he did this or he did that. Condescension is not pretty. Neither is hypocrisy. BTW, who exactly “debunked” all of these “myths” about your exalted leader. I think the issue with the BC was not debunked as you say. It’s pretty easy to see that the BC presented to the public was a fake. FWIW, I believe he probably was born in HI. The question is, why the trickery? What exactly does the man have to hide? Is it his lifestyle? Is it his actual lineage? Why no college transcripts? Why did he voluntarily give up his law license, as well as his wife doing the same? IMHO, those are legitimate questions. I await your learned responses with bated breath.

      • Aussie says:

        Creepy deserves no respect anywhere in the world. He is worse than Carter.

      • Aussie says:

        Nothing was debunked in 2008. That site with those two old people does not prove anything since they are nothing more than paid Soros shills. The minute they did that their credibility ended up in the sewer.

        Anything that comes from Media Matters or anything linked to Soros is immediately suspect.

        Yep, nothing was debunked because whatever it was that was posted on the Internet was a fake. On top of that the “birth certificate” released last year was a fake.

        The real reason has nothing to do with FMD but everything to do with the fact that he became an Indonesian citizen when he was adopted by Lolo Soetoro and attended school in Indonesia.

      • Ed says:

        Talking about disrespecting a President (during war) how about the disrespect for George W. Bush? You are a hypocritical POS.

  19. thesitrep says:

    We knew nothing about this fool when he was elected. That was his only redeeming quality and that was apparently refreshing to the electorate that voted for just Hope & Change.

    Now, not only have we a record of what an amateur and narcissistic Marxist he is but, his self-imprinted narrative is unraveling.
    After this Obama (or what ever his name is) is ejected from office, the truth will finally come out.

    The flood gates will open and vast amounts of dirt or I should say, “truth” will flow.
    When the media and administration sycophants rush to be the first to get their stories out, things like his grades, Origin of birth, biological parentage, communist associations etc will be produced.

    Hopefully this experience will wake the American people up to the biased nature of the media and the real goals of the Democrat party.

    The tea party will hopefully grow and have a great effect on both political parties and that will be the greatest of Obamugabes achievements.

    • ctdar says:

      many people knew what BO was like, they just just to ignore the facts that have been known about him for 20 years

  20. Plum Crazy says:

    This guy is always good for a chuckle.

    • solaratov says:

      Yeah. Pastor Manning’s always very good…and straight to the point.
      And he saw through the ‘mackdaddy’ obama right from the start.

  21. Ignatius J Donnelly says:

    Marxist? He’s not even much of a Liberal.

  22. Irish Eyes says:

    It’s always been one of the socalled “birther” theories that there’s something else on Obama’s BC that he’s hiding, such as someone else named as father, or no father named. Marshall has long been suggested as an alternate father candidate. If true, this makes him natural born, but means he lied about everything else. Awkward, so he doesn’t want to admit that. Perhaps BHO is not his legal name (or was not at the time) & that was the real reason for the private swearing-in do-over. The name on the original BC may have been Barry Dunham, and then there’s the complication of the Soetoro adoption, making him Barry Soetoro until he decided the Kenyan scenario was even cooler.

    • Irish Eyes says:

      Oops, sorry, meant Frank Marshall Davis, not Marshall. No a/c, my brain is melting.

    • Aussie says:

      There is an alternate that has nothing to do with all of this garbage about FMD. It is the Indonesian connection.

      When Østupid went to Indonesia he was adopted by his stepfather and was given the name Soebarkh, which is an name that appeared on his mother’s passport application.

      This means that when he was adopted his previous birth records were wiped, and a new certificate was issued. It also means that he became an Indonesian citizen which was something that was not reversed.

  23. Sausage Boy says:

    It is likely that Frankie the Freak is Barry’s daddy.

    Edited by Admin…

  24. 2ntense says:

    Pffft! To all of you, I say PFFFT! The “O” will use this to PANDER to yet another group. Nothing else to see here….

    We have sunk so low as a nation….

  25. DizzyMissL says:

    That’s nasty.

  26. DizzyMissL says:

    All the libbies will think she is great.

  27. Susiejoe says:

    This piece is analyzing a poem Obama wrote entitled Pop. I think most assume it is about his grandfather. The author here is saying that the poem is really about Marshall. Just gets more interesting.


  28. DizzyMissL says:

    I wonder if Rush has seen this?

  29. CRussell says:

    Thanks for the informational post *and* the equally informative comments, which all seem to prove my long-held theory that BH MaObama was not born of a virgin birth after all…
    No, oh no, , MaObama was actually hatched.

  30. Aussie says:

    I am going to be contrary. I am not convinced that the woman in those pictures is Anne Dunham. She looks too old to be Stanley Ann Dunham who was no more than 18 when she gave birth to the stupid one.

  31. nobody says:

    notice…under the tree …a box of 1960’s vintage Hawaiian Host brand chocolate covered macadamia nuts….hummm?

  32. Vic says:

    They should make a copy of the nude photos of Obama’s mommy and distribute them to all attendees at the DNC Convention.

  33. stuven farlow says:

    i just find it disgusting how obama gets a pass on everything. I had a friend the other day call me racist cause i was criticizing the potus, this “friend” has used the “N”-word quite often before. I never have, my ex is black, and my best friend is black/mixed. Sickens me how brianwashed people are, cant think for themselves so lets watch bill maher! hur dur!

  34. Dee says:

    It’s amazingly informative to observe how low fear will take us when we lather in it. Suppose when we lack the ammunition for intellectual debate of his failed policies, we have to stoop to hoping his mom was a whore because THAT will surely disqualify him. Does anyone care that there are two children living in the White House who have nothing to do with this? I wish there WAS someone qualified to sensibly debate his Afgan policy, expansion of powers or use of drone attacks against American citizens and innocent foreigners abroad. But there isn’t because both parties sign off on these failed policies and then systemically defraud the likes of Ron Paul who tries to challenge the status quo. But nevermind habeas corpus and other big ideas that cause us to empathize with one another and think. Let’s just call him and his mama names because that will create jobs, prevent the erosion of liberties and reign in presidential powers. Smh…. 3 min of my life I will never get back.

    • Mark says:

      Bad Afghan Policy?

      You mean the policy which led to Osama Bin Laden being killed and AQ being demolished to the backwaters of Yemen?

  35. Mark says:

    When the republican party have nothing else to complain about, they go and criticise their dead family? How sick is that?

    Just stop for a second, and think ‘What if someone said that about my parents? Would I be comfortable with all these lies coming out?’ If you’re ok with this, then you have no conscience..

  36. soat says:

    With a socialist/communist agenda, don’t you think “his” agenda is more important or where he got the ideas, funding, backing, and purpose? His history is what has brought us to this point. His family and their history is what has brought us to this point. Someone needs to wake up and smell the coffee. I can assure you none of us in America would ever for one moment think something this big or deceitful could “happen in America” but it is happening as we speak. The movie where this stuff came from “Dreams from my Real Father” is very powerful and full of actual evidence but we find ourselves not wanting to believe it because we are in America.
    My question to you is simple. Don’t you think China and Russia would love America to become a Socialistic form of government? Don’t you think they believe Capitalism is a scam and are dying to prove it? Wouldn’t they love for one moment, America wasn’t as strong as we are (soon to be were) so they can “do whatever they want” with “whomever they want”? How nieve are we? History proves it works, look at Germany, Japan, Russia, and China.
    My question is why are the other 535 co conspirators (Congress), who should be diving into this, not diving into this?
    Someone said once “it’s not the vote that counts, it’s the person counting the vote that counts”. WAKE UP AMERICA AND PAY ATTENTION.

    • Mark says:

      Do you even know what a communist/socialist agenda is? It sounds a lot like you are just repeating the same old junk that I’ve heard from every other Romney Lover.

      What is even more disturbing for the women in America is his own personal beliefs on women. He says he wants to ‘reduce legislation on everyone to make them more free.’, except womens vaginas. He is using a personal religious belief to change political legislation that affects millions of people and that is plain WRONG.

      • soat says:

        Re distribution of wealth brings to mind one socialistic agenda. Dah. But the fact you believe freedom of a woman’s vagina is anything about abortion you need to take an anatomy class. The unborn child in a woman’s “womb” is what is at hand. A life is a life, a soul is a soul, whether it has been born or not, it is still “alive”.
        Personally, how ever the “life” was created should be a responsiblity to allow it to live. Rape is a an extremely violent crime but murdering a life is a cruel way of attempting to “make it right”. No one can make rape right, but killing an innocent life doesn’t make it right either, legislation or not.

        • Mark says:

          America has its very origins in re-distribution of wealth or as its more commonly known; ‘Tax’. You know when you eat food, it has to pass regulations so it can be sold and consumed by humans. These regulations are enforced by local and federal government. This all costs money, which is where this ‘Redistribution of wealth comes in’ (Tax), so, you should know what your taxes go towards; which is making sure that you have safe food to eat, good roads to drive on and electricity in your homes as well as giving veterans a helping hand in many different ways.

          When you don’t want to pay taxes any more, stop using all of these services as using them and complaining about taxes is completely hypocritical.

          Let me guess Soat, you’re a guy? I can tell because only men have this kind of psyche about abortion, where the innocent life should be protected. This decision affects millions of women, for which such a difficult choice is beyond your understanding of the reasons for abortion.

          • soat says:

            What tax to collect and how it is spent, better yet, who gets to spend it is the difference. We both know we arent’ talking about roads. Welfare, Food Stamps, Unemployment, Free Phones, etc. All have a place and purpose but to be used to “discourage” personal repsonsibility is wrong. Look at the numbers.
            Did you read what you posted?
            “This decision affects milions of women”. Like it doesn’t affect “millions of babies”. Lives that will not get the chance at life because “the mom” thinks she is in this decision “alone” and she should make the decision to “kill the baby” because it will “affect her” the rest of her life. Nine months but really the rest of her life. Like abortion goes away and doesn’t affert her the “rest of her life”. Really.
            Understand the violence of Rape or incest never disappears, ever, birth of a baby or not and I don’t need to be a woman to know that. The only person whose life is affected “forever” is the baby’s life.
            Look at Dave Thomas of Wendy’s. What if his life had been taken away? What a tremendous loss to us all, not to say his daughter.
            Ask her if adoption is a bad thing? Read what Dave thought of adoption.
            The mother has “a choice” without abortion and that is to give up the child for adoption. That should be the only “choice” in this equation since the only one who will speak for the child in this equation is “Me”. I don’t see you speaking up for the child but only how bad the next nine months would be for the Mom.
            I was pro choice until it affected our family directly and you are faced with the innocent murder of a child, a human being, a soul, a life gone forever, all in the name of giving the woman a right to choose whether to spend the next nine months having a child.
            Sorry the child should be given a voice in this decision. The woman is not making a decision about “her” body but the “baby’s body”. Plain and simple.
            I’m sure there are plenty of famiies who whould like to adopt, even gays.
            Why not allow the child to have a chance to live?????? Who knows maybe they will turn out like Dave Thomas.

            • Mark says:

              Well you may not be talking about Roads etc. but I am.
              Romney has said repeatedly that he would like defence spending increased dramatically. He’d probably spend this on something like war (What else could you spend $2t on) more war means more veterans. Veterans need more support than the average Joe on the street. They have seen the worst of civilisation and many are scarred for life. But in the Veteran Jobs Bill, many republicans voted against a bill, that the republicans built. This spells out the Romney ethos perfectly, ‘Will send men to war, but won’t care for them when they get back’.

              You can think whatever you like, but a foetus is NOT a baby. There are two distinct properties of both. One is usually made up of a clump of cells no bigger than a little finger. A baby is an independent living organism that is outside the human body.

              Well, in your argument, you want to take away many areas of social welfare, I can only assume social care falls under this, so the mother and baby would be left on their own.

              If a baby doesn’t get the right care in its first few years, there is no end of problems which the baby could end up in. I’m sure when the mother is at the critical point, she considers what life for her baby will be like. And yet you make out that she is being totally selfish. You have no idea what is going through her mind at that point.

              Can you see how your pro-life argument is hypocritical?

              • soat says:

                First off. Tell Scott Peterson that and all the folks who convicted him for “two murders” one for his wife, Lacy and his “un-born” son, Connor. He would love to hire you as his attorney for an appeal. Did you notice they called her fetus Connor.
                How can you have your cake and eat it to? One minute it is a murder and the next it isn’t a “baby”. How hypocritical are you?
                A Life is a Life. How it is delivered and when doesn’t matter. Watch a partial birth abortion and tell me whether the doctor is performing an abortion or a “delivery”.
                How can it be anything else? What is wrong with you saying a “fetus is not a baby”?
                As soon as someone finds out they are pregnant, they “always say” “WE ARE HAVING A BABY!” not “We are having a “FETUS”. If it wasn’t alive and growing it wouldn’t need to be aborted. Why doesn’t the mom just control her body by diet to wish it away like “fat” (a clump of cells), because it is alive and growing as a “baby” not a clump of cells.
                Some babies who have been aborted have “lived” through the ordeal. What Now Tonto?
                Someone needs to get a grip on reality and realize Pro Choice is selfishness by the mother or family of the mother. The baby is not considered a child by your standards but as I said earlier, Scott Petersen would agree with you and all of your Pro Choice buddies.
                Adoption or Not Adoption is the “ONLY” choice needed. So if you want Choice- Choose LIFE Always.
                As far as jobs, taxes, etc. Someone has to pay for government jobs. Teachers, Firemen, Bridge builders and all the other jobs being offered by Obama are “government paid jobs”. It doesn’t grow the economy.
                For every dollar you pay in wages, they pay back .30 in taxes but the original dollar comes from the government to begin with. Only by creating jobs outside of government does the economy grow. How simple is that?
                Where did the government get the dollar to pay these people? Oh, they can borrow it or print it whatever comes first.
                Your concept falls apart as soon as the government “can no longer borrow” the money to keep things going. Try using your credit card when it is “maxed out”. BIG PROBLEM.

                • Mark says:

                  The exact moment of conception is when a sperm enters the egg, FACT. This is still one egg with a sperm inside it, FACT. This does not make it a baby.

                  If your argument was hypothetically correct, then a woman would be murdering 3 babies every time she had a period, (Life can now be created with one egg and any other cell from the human body http://tinyurl.com/nqewb) or will you ban these as well?
                  And at this point, a woman doesn’t say I’m having a baby, she just says “I’m pregnant.” Big difference.

                  In Britain, abortion is allowed at 24 weeks and before. This is because at this stage, the baby does not have a central nervous system which will allow it to feel pain. After this time, if an abortion is carried out it is only done if the mothers life is in danger somehow. This is the right way to go.

                  But if you think that when a woman has an abortion and she jumps out of where it took place and she suddenly throws a big party, then you are sadly mistaken. That moment is the most scarring in a womans life, which she will have thought about for massive periods of time in which she questions the babies quality of life as she may not be in a fit state to take care of it. That is not being selfish and you are being offensive to every woman who has had to go through such an ordeal.

                  I would totally agree with your adoption drive, if it wasn’t for the fact that Romney would probably cut that as well and there would still be no improvement in the quality of life.

                  You know what happens when a ‘Government Paid Worker’ goes to do his shopping? He pays for it with money given to him by the government. This will happen thousands of times an hour in thousands of companies. This money then goes to pay the cashier in Wal-Mart, the Wal-Mart driver and the floor manager. If this happens enough, Wal-Mart need to hire new people to serve the extra demand. Wal-Mart pay the new people and it all starts again with some other company like 7/11. That is how an economic recovery happens, not just through the old conservative motto of ‘Privatise it’.

                  And btw, you know who else is a government paid employee? Soldiers. But Romeny wants to increase these. How will he pay for them as well as pay for a 20% tax cut on EVERYONE and pay for a deficit reduction program?
                  That would be like you moving to a bigger house and then asking for 20% less pay from your employer and asking your bank not take as much money every month for the massive mortgage costs.

                  • soat says:

                    First, when a woman has a period it is without sperm. Life doesn’t happen without “two parties” involved. One the egg donor and the other the sperm donor. Periods don’t count.
                    We should not be pushing Pro Choice only Pro Adoption not Pro Abortion. Why is the woman going through so much turmoil making a decision about abortion? Because she knows she is killing her baby. Calling it anything else is just ridiculous. Why do they “grieve” over the decision for years after, probably their whole life?
                    You say because “she was looking out for the quality of life for the child” it was not a “selfish” decision on her part? Really. Adoption contests that statement.
                    The child is dead and doesn’t have “any” life forget the quality.
                    I think if you could have asked the child what their “choice” would be “Quality of Life or No Life”, I think you would know the answer. Quality of Life is irrelevant.
                    Excuse me if I offend any woman who has made this choice including my own daughter. We know we killed the baby, not a bunch of cells and yes we have all been “grieving” ever since as well as every woman who has ever done it. I was for her choice when in reality I was being selfish on my part in that decision. It is not a decision to make it is a responsibility to accept.
                    The decision was made when the “two” parties got together to make the baby. That’s when the decisions should have been made. Not after the fact.
                    Attempts at making it something it isn’t doesn’t change the FACT as you say. The baby is dead, no life, not by any means or any quality of Life.
                    Abortion when saving the woman’s life is another issue. Whose life do you save? Both by any means in my opinion. Fortunately, they are saving many more Premees with new technology and I’m sure the idea of when Life begins will ratchet back further as more and more are saved.
                    As far as government jobs, remember this, there is only .70 cents left to spend and “save” out of the $1.00 the government spent. It can only spiral downwards from there.
                    It takes private money invested in “new businesses” and “new jobs” with NEW MONEY injected into the economy to crank it up. History has proven that time and time again.
                    Obama has already spent “Trillions” of injecting money into the economy which has been lost “never to return” into anyone’s economy. How many more Trillions or years can we take this?
                    It is a simple fact, “If he’s not doing the job, it’s OK to LET HIM GO”. At least with Romney we have a chance at a new direction, CHANGE AS YOU CALL IT.

                  • Mark says:

                    Did you not read the link? Life can happen with just one woman, no sperm. READ THE LINK.

                    The problem in your scenario is that the mother often finds the situation of bringing up a foetus inside her difficult. This could be for infinite number of reasons. Such as she will get abused in many different ways if she shows signs that she is pregnant. This isn’t being selfish, as any damage to the womb at later stages increases the chance of either the female or the baby dying.

                    Once again, you can’t understand the turmoil that a woman would go through when coming to this decision.

                    You have your sums wrong, Bush in the 2 TERMS spent trillions of dollars going to war in another country in a mission to kill Osama Bin Laden, defeat al-Qaeda and find WMD in Iraq. He did none of them in 8 years. Osama managed to kill Osama, erase al-Qaeda in the middle east and exit from Iraq in in 4 years, which makes him infinitely more successful than Bush. If you compare Bush’s economic policy with Romneys, you find some stark comparisons.

                    Bush – decreased taxes, while paying for 2 wars, increased defence spending.
                    Romney – Wants to decrease taxes, wants to defend the ability to wage 2 wars at once and wants to increase defence spending

                    At least Obama only spent money on making sure that the American people had jobs (Latest job reports show employment rates are up) making sure that the people had healthcare (reforms to come in soon).

                    Personally, I respect Obama more than any other American president in history, except JFK and I don’t even live in the USA.

  37. ftsk420 says:

    That’s Obama Mama? with a mom like that there’s no way Obama would have a son that looked like Tryavon Martin. Just sayin :)

  38. I just don’t know what to believe in anymore. But, “Ye who is without sin, cast the first stone.” That sinless person is certainly not me.

Comments are closed.