Apparently the DOJ is very worried about the ongoing movements to audit U.S. election systems and identify voter fraud issues. Attorney General Merrick Garland announces today that the Justice Department will double the number of federal employees inside the DOJ civil rights division and scrutinize any post-election audits for evidence of voting law violations.
Obviously the first set of inquiries into U.S. election systems is discovering multiple flaws and ways that vote outcomes can be manipulated. More states are taking note of the myriad of election integrity issues as an outcome of the 2020 election which was transparently flawed. The groundswell is picking up and several states are reviewing the audit procedures currently underway in Arizona.
Not surprisingly, today the DOJ Attorney General announces the federal government is prepared to intervene in order to retain the status quo. WATCH:
.
Just one more criminal in the long line of democrat criminals.
Will this be ‘the spark’?
Hmmm. I was just thinking of that myself.
It could be the stolen election!
There should be a call from federal and states’ legislators for Garland publicly to enumerate just what federal election laws he thinks might be being violated by an audit.
Arizona has plenty of expert legal counsel which knows exactly what the laws are at every level. This is just a bluff.
A legislature can ask any legitimate question relating to an employee’s job performance … and compel an answer. It has every power that a court does, and then some.
Right, Mike.
To be effective, though, they have to have the fortitude to ask the right questions and to pursue the answers to wherever they lead. Looks like the AZ legislature has it all. They’ll make history and set an example for all. I have my doubts about some of the states that have sent delegations to AZ. I fear that GA is doing it for show.
He really is a bitter, scared old man. He is still hoping for the SCOTUS gig and is counting on Groping Joe to get it for him (or Kommie Kammie if Joe doesn’t get out of trouble and stay out of trouble). Moderate is what Bathwater Barry wanted us to believe Garland was. I guess maybe in a world of Marxists he was moderate. Not he’s a card carrying Marxist member of the Communist Party too.
Imagine weaponizing the DOJ against Republicans. Where have we heard and seen that before? I would be willing to bet that Herr Andrew Weissmann will head up that “tusk” force (you know, stick it in deep before they can see anything).
Weissmann already runs the DOJ, or at least he did during the Mueller fiasco. Garland is just frosting on the cake. The DOJ has been severely compromised since Barry’s wingman Holder filled it with radicals.
There is another side to this that we should be keeping an eye on. As more information comes out in these forensic audits, the more the crooked election officials in other states know what to hide/bury/add back to their “safe and secure” machines and boxes of ballots.
For example:
They now know to ‘replace’ the routers that were used during the election.
They now know to go back and make creases in mail in ballots.
They now know to go back and put serial numbers on ‘duplicate’ ballots.
They now know to replace machine marked ballots with hand marked ballots.
They now know to ‘post create’ chain of custody records.
They know to yank all modems or connections from the machines.
Etc.
The list goes on and they are watching, learning, and surely taking preemptive actions before they are audited. If one believes there was fraud in so many places, then one must recognize that fraud will continue now to cover up the fraud.
Auditors will have to be prepared to go deeper, when it is even possible, to root out these changes that have been made in the past 6 months and assuredly continue now.
That’s the whole problem with being transparent in everything. Just like President Trump though I applaud him for it it was a glaring light to the left for fighting. Notice how the democrats are shadows and only let out what they want ‘us’ to believe.
GREAT points. Current and potential future election fraud perps watching the forensic analysis to know what to go home and take care of and what to do and not to do next time, just as the various “Gate” perps during the “investigations” of anti-Trump activities learned from revelations of some of their mistakes.
They can do these things but they will have to ensure dates and times and logs are there.
And keep in mind ROUTERS shouldn’t have ever been connected to the internet. It wasn’t just those routers but many of the systems themselves had wireless communications devices within them.
This on top of all of the other details which are already know? That their own states laws and constitutions were violated? All we need is decertifications of results. Then the president who never conceded the election can make his move.
Must protect the narrative.
Whoa there Merrick! The history below has some relevance. Substitute Dems for North.
From Free North Carolina: Secession Was Not About Slavery : “President James Buchanan disagreed with secession as the prerogative of a State, but admitted that he as president held no authority to levy war to stop it — and his attorney general concurred. Both were well-aware of Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution: “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying was against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.” Buchanan could not use military force against a State without committing treason.
“The States of the deep South dissolved their connection with the voluntary union of the United States with marked legality at the beginning of 1861. For a quarter of a year no one knew that there was to be a war. Then Lincoln (unauthorized by the Constitution) called for troops; and the upper South, led by Virginia, seceded.
The point is, Lincoln could have chosen to let the South go in peace on the grounds that a just government depends on the consent of the governed, and the Southern States had withdrawn that consent.
But, said the North, the majority do consent, since there are more people in the North. Even if most of the people in the South do not consent, we in the North are the majority of the whole nation. Thus, the rights of a minority, although a minority of millions, mean nothing.
This is precisely what [Alexis] de Tocqueville warned against: the tyranny of the majority. And Lord Acton was deeply convinced that the principle of States’ rights was the best limitation upon the tyranny of the majority that had ever been devised.
Thus Lee did represent the cause of freedom, and Lord Acton broke his heart over Lee’s surrender because the principle of States’ rights was finally and forever denied.
The South did not secede to “preserve and extend slavery.” Its “pro-slavery“ arguments were not in response to any major political party in the antebellum period calling for emancipation. There was none! Southern secession was a result of 70 years of defending itself against Northern economic exploitation, Northern unwillingness to abide by Constitutional mandates and restraints, and a more recent Northern inclination to centralize sovereignty in the general government. Slavery issues were only the latest “occasions” regarding Northern Constitutional infidelity. Therefore slavery issues were a derivative of a more fundamental concern over the North’s history of disregard for the Constitution in its quest for political and economic control of the US. “
I guess the AG , Drew his line in the sand. Anyone who denies that this election was not free and fair, Is in a group of people who are so attached to the status quo ,That they choose to ignore reality and create thier own Shang~~Gra ~~La.
But when they stop and think someday they no doubt will realize they were FOOLS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Evil is as Evil does
He can threaten all he wants. We’re still going to get as many audits as we can.
as a Brit who does not understand the mechanics of US politics or law I have a question.
If the AZ proves fraud to the extent that Biden did not win AZ then I assume tge AZ state folks will decertify their election result.
I also assume in the very safe assumption that DC is corrupt this will be poo-poo’ed by the DC folks and media and will in effect be totally ignored.
Just what power does a STATE have when fighting FEDERAL corruption.
Can a state ignore federal law /
Can a state from a militia to defends its elf against federal corruption ?
Yes. ANY right not expressly given to the federal government as stated in the Constitution is a state right. States hold MUCH more power under the Constitution than the federal government. This was intentional in design. Of course, there exists many federally overreaching laws have been added to the books over time, and states have not pushed back hard enough against these. Greedy state leaders allowed this to happen because additional state funding from the federal coffers was tied to implementation of these federal laws as an incentive. When the states challenge the federal government, the ultimate deciding factor should be the Constitution and perhaps a few noteworthy precident-setting cases decided by the Supreme Court that aim to clarify the meaning of things in the Constitution. Should states decertify their elections, our country will find itself in a crisis–there is no provision for this. How could the Founding Fathers have ever imagined such large-scale, thorough cheating using such complex technology? This is why the second amendment exists–so that in a crisis, the American citizenry can take back ultimate control of their country and rid itself of those seeking to destroy it. The Founding Fathers may not have been able to conceive of this situation, but they already knew what the solution was.
I thought it would be a cold day in Arizona before I said this but here goes: Thank you Senator Mitch McConnell for blocking this socialist/communist/democrat from becoming a Supreme Court Justice. Thank you Thank you.
The federal government declined to exercise what very limited constitutional authority it has for investigating elections regarding the November, 2020, election – despite numerous and loud pleas. The Congress declined on January 6, 2021, and the federal courts repeatedly declined to hear evidence-based complaints of election fraud, including a complaint filed by the State of Texas on December 8, 2020 – which, as a complaint against other States, was a complaint that, per the Constitution, had to be brought as a first-instance to the Supreme Court.
So, sod off, Mr. Garland.
Dodged the bullet keeping Garland, who is nearly as senile as Biden, off the Supreme Court.
The problem for the DOJ is simply that State Legislatures have “plenary” powers within their States. And this is, strictly speaking, “a personnel matter.” Did these state officers, being employees who report to the Legislature, do their jobs “under penalty of law?”
They were given the duty to ensure that the election was freely and fairly executed. “Well, did they?” ?♂️
Too little, too late. What are they worried about, this was the most secure election in American history?
Isn’t the Government supposed to take up cases of fraud when the evidence leads to criminal behavior? What’s this garbage of threatening States who investigate voter fraud?
AZ audit must be over target… Got the rats in D.C. really scared. Watch them scurry in all directions.
That said, be prepared for some highly illegal moves by the FBI, DOJ and the compromised, Deep State–owned SCOTUS.
Over *the target
Guys: We need no civil war 2.0, only to remove top 150-200 D.C. national security and law enforcement bureaucrats who have been running the country in an increasingly removed manner from constitutional limits and restraints.
The politicians will swiftly fall in line!
When they act this guilty…
When I ask most people I know to be conservative or voted for Trump about the Arizona audit they are not aware or have not heard about the audit. This tells me less people than I thought know what in the he’ll is going on.
Merrick Garland, a real he-man with nothing but love and dedication to gaining the best for the Republic and its citizens. Not. These spineless bureaucratic toads are fearless in their pride and in their lies. The truth is not in them. See Gospel of John chapter 8, verse 44.
Check the recount fir fraud…. Not the original count.
Riiiiiight……
“Doubling the size of the Civil Rights Division” — Someone please take note of statements like this about expanding bureaucratic offices. The resulting list will be a guide where to cut first and deepest at 12:01 on inauguration day.
That means we’d best secure our ham sandwiches. The CRD will try to indict them given an opportunity.
Garland is making it obvious that this is a Lawfare-led “search and destroy” offensive, NOT an investigation of any already-committed crimes.
SCOTUS was pretty clear. The Federal Government does not have jurisdiction over the way the states run their elections.
HOWEVER. President Trump NEVER conceded the election. As states begin their decertification of the 2020 election results, this leaves open the challenge of the election. I still think August is a bit optimistic but the taste of their fear is in the air.
Dog Whistle!