September 20th – 2020 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1340

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.


This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Kayleigh McEnany Twitter @PressSec

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,110 Responses to September 20th – 2020 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1340

  1. WhiteBoard says:

    here is a slightly better image for the video

    rubio says FBI was told not to use the Steele Dossier

    SSCI report saying the ICA was done greatly (14-1) vote – Rubio had better been the 1.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. furtive says:

    It begins:

    The “district of corruption“ last night 10:40 PM

    Liked by 1 person

  3. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 5 people

    • joseywalesandtenbearsbarandgrill says:

      Adam has a track record of failing to deliver. Joe D seems to have backed off in these past couple of months himself.

      Liked by 4 people

      • WRB says:

        How silly is your post? You disagree this week is going to be very interesting. ?

        At a minimum we will see a SCOTUS pick, BLM/antifa action in DC, possible new signatories to the Abraham Accords, and who knows what other “surprises.”

        Oh, you think Durham will not announce something this week? We shall see.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Troublemaker10 says:

      Isn’t something from Sen Johnson on Ukraine/Burisma investigation supposed to come out this week? Didn’t Lindsay Graham hit at that also?

      Housley’s remark was pretty general. Could have just been a basic statement about scotus pick, etc.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Phalcon says:

      Also this


  4. WhiteBoard says:

    bill gates on sunday fox shows – he had hoped the covid supplemental bill would of had the 4 billion to buy vaccines for other poor countries.

    this guy…

    Liked by 6 people

  5. David says:

    Abraham Lincoln:
    On Jan. 27, 1838, Lincoln spoke before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois, about “the perpetuation of our political institutions.” During that address, he said: “At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide.”

    PDJT Paraphrased Abraham Lincoln:
    PDJT Tweet April 16, 2015 America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.

    Other Paraphrased Abraham Lincoln:
    America will never be destroyed from the Outside. If we Lose our Freedoms it will be because we have Destroyed ourselves from Within.

    PDJT will stop the destruction from Within America and Ourselves.

    Liked by 7 people

  6. Simple Citizen says:

    Every now and again I pass through Winter Watch, and I found this point an interesting hypothesis:

    “If eight SCOTUS justices (rather than nine) are called upon to decide the 2020 election and the decision is deadlocked, then what? A do over? Or is it possibly treated as a contingent election?

    A contingent election happens when the electoral count and popular vote is non-conclusive for some reason. In such a case, the U.S. House of Representative (currently Democrat-controlled) steps in to decide who becomes president, and the U.S. Senate chooses the vice president. Until such decisions are made, the current vice president becomes the acting president. This is my non-legal amateur interpretation of a possible scenario, for whatever it’s worth.

    SCOTUS justices are appointed by the Senate, which is currently controlled by Republicans by a narrow margin. If Republicans lose control of the Senate in the upcoming election, they will still have until Jan. 3 to appoint a new justice. If Republicans retain control of the Senate but lose the presidency, they will have until Jan. 20.”

    While I do not always agree with the site, I occasionally find something interesting. This point struck me as one of those times.


    • TwoLaine says:

      They should resign immediately, and hang their heads in shame. Cut off your noses too while you are at it.

      The only thing Congress is good at is kicking the can.

      I think they ALL owe the taxpaying citizens of this country a good clean quick nomination approval after their last sh1t show.

      Liked by 2 people

    • TwoLaine says:

      Sorry, that last post was not meant for you. The screen is hoppin’. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

      • Simple Citizen says:

        No problem, there is never an issue between us; I just thought you were venting. Always like seeing you here and always like to read what you have to say.


        Liked by 2 people

    • WhiteBoard says:

      a random federal judge from hawaii rules on the election and says Biden won.

      Liked by 1 person

    • allin4freedom says:

      If the Electoral College cannot select a president with a majority of electoral votes and the election moves to the House, then yes, the House decides by simple majority, BUT each state only has one vote. Trump won 30 states last time. The question is how the reps from each state decide what that vote should be, and what influence, if any, the voters or state legislatures have on House members in making the determination.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Simple Citizen says:

        Facinating…did not know any of this information previously.

        Thank you very much.

        Liked by 1 person

        • WhiteBoard says:

          our country has a volunteer military.

          to get trained – you have to be somewhat patriotic (inclduing which MOS you pick)

          we have the 2nd amendment..

          so this country is kept Honest not only by the 2nd amendment, but that most of the trained people are patriotic (and share that with their families)

          All usurpers know, the only way to overthrow us if through Trickery (Political correctness, making us feel alone, cause certain thoughts arent allowed in public).

          Hillary was set to knock this out the park, and Train Cart ship everyone of us away to be China Muslim Problem Solved.

          POTUS killed that plan. freeing us to speak in public again. SO now we know we arent the minority (and we include minorities).

          Liked by 1 person

    • Child of Morning says:

      This is why our President must push to seat the new pick for SCOTUS prior to Nov 3.


  7. 4sure says:

    Mitch the turtle could easily bring the commie pubs threatening to not vote for RBG replacement into line. The dems would never allow this to happen. Anyone going against the dem leadership would be punished and primaried out of office. And they know it.

    Get some balz, Mitch and do your job as majority leader. Any pub not towing the line on this SCOTUS vote MUST be politically destroyed. I don’t care who they are.

    Liked by 4 people

    • 4sure says:

      And PTrump needs to get the word to the turtle that if he does not bring his members under control on this SCOTUS vote, PTrump will do all possible to support a primary candidate and campaign against them. He will also see to it the republican party does not help or fund them in any way but will help and fund the primary candidate. PTrump is the head of the Rparty as POTUS.

      Time to play hardball. This is no time to go soft on the traitors.

      Liked by 4 people

      • WhiteBoard says:

        Mitch already won his primary, and has nick Sandman campaignign with him (he is set)

        only threat left is the China Shipping company his wife’s family owns.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Blue Moon says:

          Whiteboard, don’t be so sure about Mitch being set. Amy McGraef is hot on his trail. There is no one checking up on Kentucky’s voting setup for Nov 3. Here in our town there have made Covid19 a good enough reason to get absentee ballots. So they are sending them out as fast as they can. No one is stopping them. They have done away with all our voting precincts and made the locations to be at county park buildings etc. Reduced the number of voting locations which makes it hard for people to travel across town just to stand in lines backed up for hours. Still no one says anything. I contacted county clerk and complained and we had a knock down. She informed me to vote by mail and that solved my problem of waiting in line all day. I am 68 and she was clearly trying to discourage me from voting. I have emailed our attorney general (the one that spoke at the “Republican convention) and have heard nothing.

          Liked by 2 people

          • WhiteBoard says:

            my guess..

            Mitch’s seat is set. or he willl push the vote on the Supreme court.

            Liked by 1 person

          • An American says:

            Blue Moon, I too live in Kentucky. Where I live there are 3 ways to vote and voter I.d. is mandatory (ID with a photo and name of voter on the ID)
            1. Election Day 4 schools for In person voting. Voters can choose which one, voter I.d. required.
            Voting times 6am to 6 pm.

            2. Early in person voting, October 13 through November 2. Monday thru Friday 8:30 to 4:00 p.m., County Clerk’s Office. There are also 3 Saturday voting locations 8:00 to Noon.

            3. Mail-In Absentee. The deadline to request this is October 9th.

            To my knowledge, Kentucky is not mailing out unsolicited ballots. IMO Kentucky is doing an excellent job in handling the voting and eliminating the corruption therein. No one should have a complaint about not being able to vote. I just want the CTH people to know Lincoln’s birth state won’t let the Country down. MAGA 🇺🇸


    • Politically destroyed……I LIKE IT!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Guyski says:

      “For those of you who are unsure how to answer, or for those inclined to oppose giving a nominee a vote, I urge you all to keep your powder dry.” He urged them not to “lock yourselves into a position you may later regret.”


      Liked by 1 person

    • Dana Christianson says:

      I Wonder If Diane Feinstein Has Lisa Murkowski “Braced” Up Against The Wall Already?

      Liked by 3 people

  8. Perot Conservative says:

    Former 22-year Federal prosecutor Shipwreckedcrew has some pointed tweets this AM, I’ll just post a few.

    Liked by 2 people

    • alligatriot says:

      As I read through the thread, Hannity’s voice materialized in my head.
      Along with his two friends, “Tik” and “Tok”.

      Sure hope this guy is right.
      Sure hoped the last guy was right.

      Whoa, off to brew more coffee to counter my uncharacteristic cynicism.

      Liked by 4 people

      • All Too Much says:

        This thought came into my head: If Barr and Wray are trying to defend their respective institutions, would’t the SCO be a compromise each could live with? SCO as the renegade, adopted child the SCO could be painted to be. Sundance is explicit that SCO illegalities far outweigh the preceding events. Indictments of SCO would satisfy some of the demand for accountability, and allow preservation of the two institutions.

        Liked by 3 people

    • numbersixdance says:

      Hmmm…been down this road before. One sentence i like is “left is going hard after Barr”. If so that would indicate something positive is brewing.

      Liked by 2 people

    • WhiteBoard says:

      The FISA PAGE litigation also hints – its coming.

      Liked by 1 person

      • WhiteBoard says:

        Video 1 day before Brennen Interview with Durham:

        Carter makes comments of:

        – death threats (continued to this day – started in October 2016)
        • Carter Page says his Lawyers were in Communication with Mr. Clinesmith in April 2017

        • Carter Sent a series of letter to FBI Director Wray in February 2019 and May 2019

        • Continuation of the Cover Up by Director Wray
        • Starting to have accountability (huge overlap of Clinesmith activity and currently with Director Wray)

        • recently saw first sign the FBI and DOJ acting in accordance with the Crime Victims Right Act

        • Begged Director Wray to get to the bottom of this (answers still unanswered)
        • Wray was representing the FBI in February of 2018 when they “misled” the SSCI

        Liked by 1 person

    • Drogers says:

      Perot Conservative –

      I have been reading much more of his comments lately. I didn’t know he was a former Federal prosecutor. Nice tight writing style used to make his point. Figures now.

      Thanks for passing that along.


  9. David says:

    PDJT will stop America from Destroying itself from Within by;
    1. Winning the November Election.
    2. Implement Equal Justice
    3. Deal with “Liberal Judges” who don’t follow the Rule of Law or the Constitution.

    LIBERAL JUDGES (How will #3 be Accomplished)

    PART 1
    SHOULD JUDGES BE REMOVED/IMPEACHED when they Re-write the Constitution/Laws to be changed to a Globalist Constitution? (ALL IMO)

    In doing the Comparative of how historical Judges were impeached (degree of the crime) are deminimis compared with the Gross Intentional Negligence or rise to the level (or aided and abetted) of Treason, Subversion and Sedition in their Rulings, in the name of Globalism

    Liberal Judges Rulings are way beyond the interpreting of laws; they appear to ignore the Rule of Law and the Rewriting of the Constitution in favor of a Globalism (Globalist Constitution).

    I’m using the Historical 9th Circuit court of Appeals for my arguments (example).
    1. PDJT tweeted: “First the Ninth Circuit rules against the travel ban & now it hits again on Sanctuary Cities-both ridiculous rulings. See you in the Supreme Court!”
    2. PDJT tweeted: The Obstructionist Democrats make Security for our country very difficult. They use the courts and associated delay at all times. Must stop! Aug. 19 2017
    3. PDJT tweeted: Radical Islamic Terrorism must be stopped by whatever means necessary! The courts must give us back our protective rights. Have to be tough! Aug. 19 2017

    The Supreme Court “Agreed” in favor of PDJT travel ban.
    Liberal Judges do not interpret the Constitution and laws, they tend to rewrite them. Judges are supposed to apply the Law, not create Law. The Framers of the Constitution intended that the United States would be a government of laws, not of men, but each “activist” decision chips away at this design, bringing us closer to a robed oligarchy and a Globalist Constitution.

    Courts when dealing with Federal Constitutional rights—are bound by the precedents of the Supreme Court. To the extent that a case presents an unresolved question, courts should likewise give effect to the original public meaning of the text before them. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals seems to have decided the travel ban case based on personal preference of a Globalist Constitution. Did this personal preference cross the line into “Intentional Gross Negligence” or rise to the level (or aided and abetted) of Treason, Subversion and Sedition? If so, are there remedies?

    Are the 9TH Circuit Court of Appeals decisions “ALL political for a New Global Constitution” replacing the United States Constitution? Are the Liberal Courts applying the theory that the Constitution is alive and flows with the times? Are the Liberal Courts trading Nationalism for Globalism/Elitism crossing the line into Treason, Subversion and Sedition?

    Liked by 3 people

    • David says:

      PART 2
      Historically Judges removed were for obvious criminal behavior or unfitness, things like income tax evasion, bribes, being drunk on the bench. There’s “Never” been an impeachment over interpreting laws that clearly shows they are writing laws, or when dealing with Federal Constitutional rights—of being bound by the precedents of the Supreme Court (Flynn Case), AND to the extent that a case presents an unresolved question, courts should likewise give effect to the original public meaning of the text before them. Especially now, in large numbers, Globalist/Liberal Judges are creating laws that don’t exist, ignoring laws that are written and eliminating the U.S. Constitution in their rulings to “Intentionally destroy the U.S. Constitution. Fifteen Federal Judges have been impeached. Of those fifteen; eight were convicted by the Senate, four were acquitted by the Senate, and three resigned before an outcome at trial.

      These Courts/Judges goes way beyond interpreting the Constitution and Laws; they are rewriting Laws and the Constitution. The Courts/Judges have increased these traitorous tactics, of rewriting Laws and the Constitution to eliminate the U.S. Constitution, to be replaced with a Globalist Constitution.

      CASE-1: Trump’s Immigration Executive Order. (Future Case Sanctuary Cities)
      Should Judges be Impeached (or charged) if they Intentionally Ignore Law and the Constitution resulting in Intentional Gross Negligence, or rise to the level of Treason, Subversion and Sedition for the intended purpose of having a New Global Constitution.

      9TH Circuit Court of Appeals Judges (Travel Ban Example)
      1. Did Judges Intentionally put the United States of America at Risk?
      2. Did Judges Intentionally not look at the 4-corners of the Document Order?
      3. Did Judges Incorrectly use the President’s Tweets and Verbal Statements during his Campaign?
      4. Did Judges Know; Presidents are given primary responsibility for Protecting our homeland?
      5. Did Judges Know that the Law is Clear; The President is Granted the Explicit Authority to Suspend the Entry of all Aliens or any Class of Aliens for such period as he/she shall deem necessary, when he/she “finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens would be detrimental to the interest of the United States”?
      6. Did Judges Know; The Sworn Duty of Judges is to apply the law?
      7. Did Judges Know they should not second-guess the President Authority, especially if they are not even applying the Evidence to the Law?
      8. Did Judges Know Overreaching can put the United States at a National Security Risk?
      9. Did Judges Know the President received classified intelligence briefings about threats in which they don’t receive?
      10. Did Judges Know the Presidents primary responsibility is for protecting our homeland?
      11. Did Judges Intentionally not value the Rule of Law and Separation of Powers?

      Are the rulings of these Judges that Intentionally Ignored the Constitution and Laws, resulting in Intentional Gross Negligence, a GREATER CRIME than historical removal of Judges for Tax Evasion, Income Tax Evasion, Bribes, Being Drunk on the Bench. Are the Rulings of these Judges exposing the United States for Current/Future Threats that could endanger the United States? Are these Judges risking the on-going-concern of the U.S. Constitution?

      Liked by 4 people

      • David says:

        Part 3
        Theses Judges Intentionally/Knowingly Obstructed the President from Protecting the United States and its Citizens. These Judges intentionally did not apply law in order to aid and abet a New World Order under a New Global Constitution representing Globalism and Elitism.

        The Founding Fathers Intent was not for the Constitution and its Laws to be changed by Judges, and for the Constitution to be transformed into a New Global Constitution controlled by Globalist/Elitist.
        Liberal Judges (9th Circuit Court of Appeals) additional Actions in the name of Globalism;
        1. Applied the Rule of Law Governed by Men, Not the Law.
        2. Circumvented the Separation of Powers.
        3. Disparaged the Judiciary’s Constitution Function (Not impartial and independent of all external pressures of Globalism).
        4. Judges bypassed the Constitution to enhance their own power, sidestep the other branches, and reach the outcome they wanted (Eliminating the U.S. Constitution replaced by Globalist Constitution).
        5. Substituted their own Judgment for the Rule of Law; this is a nation of laws, not men.
        6. Liberal Judges had a sworn duty to uphold and evenhandedly apply our nation of laws.
        7. Liberal Judges created a system where they are above the President and above the Law.

        Liberal Judges picked which parts of the Laws/Constitution to comply to and which to ignore; this was their process of destroying the U.S. Constitution in the name of Globalism.

        Each Justice or Judge of the United States in part takes the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his/her office: and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as under the “Constitution” and “Laws” of the United States. Did the 9th Circuit Court comply with their Sworn Oath?

        Does the Accumulations of these Acts listed above and others not listed here rise to the level of Treason, Subversion and Sedition? (1) Attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the Government (2) The undermining of the power and authority of an established system or institution (3) Conduct inciting people to rebel against the Authority of a State.

        It appears Liberal Judges applied their own personal views of how the Laws/Constitution and the United States should be. It appears Liberal Judges “deepest values” and their inner “core” is above the Law and the Constitution. It appears Liberal Judges had their inner core battle with the United States of America. These Judges battles (rulings) with the United States Constitution was allied/partnered with Globalist/Elitist/Dims/Rinos/Media/Business-round table, Chamber of Commerce and Wall Street that wants to destroy the United States Constitution and replace it with the New Global Constitution.

        Why shouldn’t Liberal Judges be Impeached if they intentionally ignore Law resulting in Intentional Gross Negligence or if these Judges are Aiding and Abetting in Acts of Treason/Subversion and Sedition for the Purpose of destroying the Constitution and replacing it with Global Constitution. Are these Judges directly Aiding and Abetting in Acts of Treason/Subversion and Sedition? It seems these Liberal Judges are not doing their Sworn Duty under their Oath of following United States Law and the Constitution

        Liked by 3 people

        • David says:

          PART 4
          1. A majority vote of the House of Representatives is required to bring impeachment charges (Article I, Section 2, Clause 5), which are then tried before the Senate (Article I, Section 3, Clause 6). Two-thirds of the Senate must vote to convict before an official can be removed.
          2. The process of Impeachment is a difficult long process and would disrupt the Government.
          3. The Process of Impeachment would “Expose” the public to Liberal Judges rulings in the destruction of the U.S Constitution for their intended goal of replacing it with a Global Constitution.
          4. Is the Earthquake Disruption of Government worth it; since the United States is fighting a Legal Civil War of saving the U.S. Constitution?
          5. Shouldn’t Senators and Congress Representatives be replaced in future elections; to ensure the votes needed to replace Judges that cross the line into Intentional Gross Negligence for the intentional destruction of the Constitution are impeached?
          6. Are these Acts of Liberal Judges beyond Impeachment Rules (Policies/Procedures) and should just be removed and charged with Treason/Subversion and Sedition for trying to destroy the Constitution and America?

          It appears until the American People understand the value of the U.S. Constitution and how a Globalist Constitution would destroy them; resulting in electing a majority of government representative who doesn’t believe in Globalism, this Impeachment WOULD “NOT” HAPPEN.

          There is a movement in the United States to give birth to a New Globalist Constitution; they want to Remove/Destroy Statues, Monuments and the Complete History of the United States. PDJT stated; where does this end; George Washington and Thomas Jefferson.

          Globalist are very serious and determined “today” in replacing the U.S. Constitution with a Globalist Constitution and these are their Final steps to invalidate/delegitimize the United States Constitution.

          Globalist/Coup has been using their new Globalist Constitution (laws) not the U.S. Constitution (laws) without facing Justice, and therefore feel “Justified/Emboldened” in not following the Rule of Law and the Constitution.

          PDJT will be implementing Justice to ensure the Rule of Law and the Constitution will not be eliminated, Without Justice, Globalist Constitution wins.

          I don’t know how PDJT will deal with Judges who Rewrite the Constitution/Laws to become a Globalist Constitution against the Majority of the America People after implementing Justice.

          1. In doing the Comparative of how historical Judges were impeached (degree of the crime), are deminimis compared with the Gross Intentional Negligence or rise to the level (or aided and abetted) of Treason, Subversion and Sedition in their rulings, in the name of Globalism.
          2. Why shouldn’t Liberal Judges be Impeached if they intentionally ignore Law resulting in Intentional Gross Negligence or if these Judges are Aiding/Abetting in Acts of Treason/Subversion and Sedition for the Purpose of destroying the Constitution and replacing it with Global Constitution? Very difficult to accomplish and it will take years.
          3. Maybe these Acts of Liberal Judges are way beyond Impeachment and there is no need to follow impeachment Rules (Policies/Procedures); they should be removed and charged with Treason/Subversion and Sedition for trying to destroy the Constitution and America?

          Liked by 2 people

          • Eric says:

            I agree with your (two) case in point summary…very easy to follow your thought process.

            As you point out getting a large majority in the house and two-thirds in the senate would be the only way and would take at least until year 2022.

            Your analysis for justification for impeachment is there without doubt.

            Best and quickest option as you stated; these Acts of Liberal Judges are way beyond Impeachment and there is no need to follow impeachment Rules (Policies/Procedures); they should be removed and charged with Treason/Subversion and Sedition for trying to destroy the Constitution and America?

            PT implementing justice to save the rule of law and the constitution is easy compared to impeaching judges with a large majority in the house and two-thirds in the senate…the president has the power/duty and the written criminal codes that match with the criminal acts to easily prosecute and doesn’t need the house or senate.

            If the large majority happens, it would be worth the disruption of the government to impeach for valid reasons…since the constitution and U.S. is at risk.

            To get the large majorities in either case…the public must be educated in what the globalist/elitist are doing…educate the public what globalism stands for and how our lives will be destroyed.

            Liked by 3 people

          • Michael says:

            It should be clear to everyone, these liberal judges are not trying to interpret the law and the constitution; they are rewriting laws/constitution. They are legislating from the bench acting more like lawmakers (traitors), to transform the U.S. constitution to a globalist constitution.

            Besides impeachment your second option is probably the only other option. There is nothing wrong with thinking “outside the box” especially since Obama governed outside (no rules/laws and fake facts) the box using the global constitution and we are at war.

            Most people see or are starting to see that the U.S is being changed into a socialist/communist country and they don’t want this constitutional republic converted to a country that they or their parent ran away from.

            I believe your last statement s/b applied -Maybe these Acts of Liberal Judges are way beyond Impeachment and there is no need to follow impeachment Rules (Policies/Procedures); they should be removed and charged with Treason/Subversion and Sedition for trying to destroy the Constitution and America?

            Very Interesting, Thank You

            Liked by 2 people

            • WSB says:

              Doesn’t this put these judges in the catagory of domestic enemies of the State?

              Another thought…how many of these judges could be ousted with other crimes? Accepting bribes, DUI’s, colluding with ‘judge shoppers’, etc?

              Maybe there is a simpler way to eradicate these subversives.


              • Michael says:

                Yep…these judges appear to be easily classified as domestic enemies of the state, as an insurgent who revolts against the U.S. established government (constitution).

                Amendment 14, Section 3 states, “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

                It appears there are many enemy insurgents that have blended into the populations/government and flourished/prospered in the destruction of a failed state environment, by ignoring U.S. laws and the constitution, as a revolt against our established constitutional republic.

                IMO-Historically, before P/T became President, they blended into the populations/government, including the Obama administration, FBI, DOJ, and judges that secretly implemented their plan, for many reasons, to destroy American from within.

                President Trump forced the enemies of the state to reveal who they are within our own country, to the American people and their evil plan of converting the U.S. into a socialist/communist country.

                Now the American people have a clear choice in the next election of what type of government they want to live under.

                We the people, even every poster at the CTH, must take to heart to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and be proactive in doing so.

                Sundance is instrumental in many ways of defending the Constitution and the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

                You bring up excellent points: how many of these judges could be ousted with other crimes? Accepting bribes, DUI’s, colluding with ‘judge shoppers’, etc

                And yes maybe there is a simpler way to eradicate the subversives.

                Liked by 1 person

                • WSB says:

                  Hmmm…thanks for posting. With this provision, is the remedy only impeachment, or if this is considered a criminal offence, can these people just be arrested and charged by LE?


              • David says:

                Good Morning WSB…after posting yesterday I immediately boarded a plane and just came back to the CTH to see if there were any comments.

                I hope you don’t mind if I chime in on your questions. You made some Excellent points, noting there might be more than 2-options to deal with these Liberal Judges and…

                I believe as stated above, as a result of the seriousness of these Liberal Judges to our way of life, who are working to dismantle the U.S. Constitution, seen by everyone, every day and outlined above; PDJT has a duty to Strategically think of Creative Options, like in all wars, to stop these planted/prearranged Judges who are working in parallel with the Coup/Globalist to finish their many year plan to Globalize the U.S.

                There are 3 Accomplishments that must happen for the U.S. to continue as a Constitutional Republic.
                1. PDJT must win the election. 100% will happen.
                2. PDJT must/will Implement Justice. This will be easy because the President has all the Power, and the Duty given/required by the People and the Constitution, and PDJT knows MAGA is meaningless in the long run, AND the U.S. will be destroyed easily by the Globalist/Coup if Justice didn’t happen.
                3. Liberal Judges needs to be stopped. Much more difficult because Impeachment requires the Senate/House. If liberal judges are allowed to continue their rulings of ignoring Laws/Constitution and implementing their-own Globalist Laws/Constitution from the bench; this legal civil war will continue and never end. We will never have peace, just like other countries fighting several hundred years for freedom.

                Number 1 and 2 must happen or the U.S. is done.

                Number 3 needs to happen or the civil war continues and there will never be peace. This will leave an opening for the globalist down the road, it gives the globalist hope.

                Historically, people going to court for business reasons or any reason; there was about a 90% assurance, if you followed the laws and presented a truthful, factual case, you had nothing to worry about.

                Today, if you are unlucky and have to present your case in front of a liberal Judge; they will intentionally not follow the laws that are written, not follow the Constitution and there is a high probability they will rule against you, for no reason other than to continue their Legal Civil War. They will destroy you financially and by other methods. We the People should be very worried/scared, at the loss of Equal and Fair Justice that follows the Rule of Law.

                Your direct question; PDJT options to consider to stop Liberal Judges, as stated above;
                1. Maybe these Acts of Liberal Judges are way beyond Impeachment and there is no need to follow impeachment Rules (Policies/Procedures); they should be removed and charged with Treason/Subversion and Sedition for trying to destroy the Constitution and America. The criminal codes that apply to Treason/Subversion and Sedition against the will of the American People and the Constitution, making these Federal Criminal Acts and most likely would be prosecuted at the Federal Level.
                2. As you stated/implied: the different criminal codes (other than #1) that apply to domestic enemies of the State. The criminal codes can be applied wide/deep and can reach/overlap into different areas of criminal acts.
                3. As you stated/implied; how many of these judges could be ousted with other crimes? Accepting bribes, DUI’s, colluding with ‘judge shoppers’, etc.? Yes, I believe you are implying for the prosecutors to be aggressive in their tactic, like the globalist prosecutors.
                4. As you stated/implied; Maybe there is a simpler way to eradicate these subversives. Yes exactly; way beyond and more creative than our thinking/knowledge.
                5. IMPEACHMENT, as discussed above, will be more difficult and can be done in the long run. After PDJT Implements Justice and use the Justice process to educate the America people, educate the people of the importance of the U.S. Laws/Constitution that made the U.S. the best country ever, for all the people (331 million people). This must happen first in order for PDJT to finally have elected officials (votes) in both the house/senate that are fighting for the U.S. Constitution, after the next mid-term elections, to impeach these Traitorous Liberal Judges.

                I believe a combination of all of the above must happen too eliminate these Traitorous Liberal Judges.

                I believe PDJT is thinking outside the box of being creative/aggressive in eliminating these Liberal Judges.

                The main concern is PDJT Safety/Health because there is not one person on planet earth that has the will/ability/courage to accomplish what needs to be done to save our Country.

                Have a Great Day!

                Liked by 1 person

                • WSB says:

                  Thanks so much for weighing in, David. Sorry, I did not get back to you until now.

                  We both would appreciate a complete rethinking of Law Enforcement and taking RICO based cabals out of the system.

                  I am an interior designer, so I am of no helpto implement anything with indictments.

                  But maybe a good tip or two to the right people will grease the wheels.


                • WSB says:

                  David, one other angle I thought of…corral the CLERKS!!!! They are to ones who ‘randomly rotate’ all of these cases so they conveniently show up to the intended bench.

                  Once they squeal, there is no telling what will fall out…


              • David says:

                Everyone who contributes a thought/word/sentence in fighting for Justice is helping (planting Justice/Indictment Seeds) PDJT and saving our Constitution.

                You noted 2-possible additional options to deal with these Liberal Judges that I didn’t even think about. Thank You!

                We all have common sense and the majority has logical minds to understand the evidence and see exactly what happened and that Indictments/Justice has to happen; this is all that is needed to help (hopefully) checkmate Barr into doing his sworn duty.

                We all know PDJT has the Power/Duty/Will/Ability/knowledge/Evidence along with knowing Justice must happen for the survival of this great country.

                Therefore, you and everyone (majority of people) are contributing in many ways to help (PDJT) implement Indictments/Justice.

                PDJT will eventually Implement Justice.

                Until Next Time…Take Care.

                Liked by 1 person

  10. rondo123456 says:


    “These days everyone imagines himself or herself to be a scientist. Scolds, who labor under the delusion that reading the New York Times is equivalent to holding a doctorate, unceasingly inflict on us finger-wagging lectures about how we need to “listen to the science” when it comes to masks. Apparently “masks work” because “The Science™” says so. Newsflash: these media figures and self-styled authorities aren’t (largely) scientists and know not of what they speak. As a scientist myself I feel compelled to set the record straight on what is, and is not, science. For those degreed scientists out there parroting the mask propaganda: for shame, you should know better. Cherry picking, selection bias, anecdotal data, and dubious models have no place in the arsenal of scientific inquiry.”

    Liked by 8 people

    • Joemama says:

      “Science ” is a new codeword for liberals indicating that a subject shall not be debated and anyone that tries to debate the subject or introduce true scientific evidence is an “actual nazi”.

      If one is decreed an “actual nazi” all liberals are given carte blanche to physically harm said individual, up to and including the point of death. In fact, liberals are obligated to physically harm any individual deemed an “actual nazi”.

      Liked by 3 people

  11. Perot Conservative says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nigella says:

      He say’s a lot of stuff like this… Hope this time he is right

      Liked by 3 people

    • ohnoyoudonot says:

      Ship, go watch Maria Bartiromo’s interview with Senator Rubio this morning on Sunday Futures. He mentions 2 people have been indicted and there are some serious criminal activities found. Now we know Clinesmith, but who else? He also catches himself to say he’s speculating.

      Liked by 1 person

      • WhiteBoard says:

        when is the last time we saw tash tweet

        Liked by 1 person

      • ohnoyoudonot says:

        September 18, 2020.

        Don’t forget this headline the very day of RBG death …

        When is the last time four House committee chairs — Schiff, Nadler, Maloney and Lofgren — ask DOJ inspector general to conduct an “emergency investigation” into Bill Barr’s handling of the Durham investigation and whether he has authority to issue an ‘interim’ report???

        Liked by 1 person

    • Jimmy R says:

      He said August. Nothing. Then, he said early Sept. After that didn’t pan out he said by the election. After that he said probably by the election.

      I hope he’s right.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. Dora says:

    Liked by 11 people

  13. Jenevive says:

    How, exactly would the Dems pack the court do they just vote in however
    many judges they want? Is there some process? If so can POTUS do it
    if he wins…He should?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Guyski says:

      Everyone/everyone can play that game. An infinite odd number of supreme court judges. 🤪

      Liked by 1 person

    • Brant says:

      Yes, there is no set number in the constitution. You can even have 99 justices. And even odd number not there. Odd number is just natural to avoid no decisions.

      Liked by 2 people

    • dilonsfo says:

      Congress would create a bill adding justices to the court. The bill would have to be signed by the President and the President would appoint the additional judges, who would then have to go through the normal confirmation hearings. The Constitution does not fix the number of justices so if one party held all the power they could add or subtract the number of justices.

      The court has remained at 9 justices since the 1870s. The dems would not be able to do it unless they had the Presidency, and they majority in both the House and the Senate.

      Liked by 2 people

    • SHV says:

      In order to “pack the SCOTUS”, the Dems would have to win House, Senate majorities and the Presidency. A “Judicial Procedures Reform Bill” would likely be subject to filibuster, so the Dems would have to go “nuclear” and totally eliminate the filibuster. From a practical point of view, if the Dems get a huge “triple sweep” in this election, the Country would be totally screwed and court packing would be a minor consideration.

      Liked by 2 people

  14. Sentient says:

    Expodentially!!! Look out – 200 million Americans are going to die TODAY

    Liked by 6 people

    • More Bore says:

      Wow, how long ago was this posted and do I still have time to get my affairs in order???


      Liked by 5 people

    • TwoLaine says:

      There he goes talking to the wall again.

      Liked by 2 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      I don’t “SMH” much… but that deserves one.

      Let’s see… if 200 million Americans are gonna die… and the U.S. owns something like 20% of all global COVID deaths… hmm… doing some quick math here… carry the one… ok, that must mean there are currently a little over 32 billion COVID cases to date. Is that right? Sounds high.

      Liked by 2 people

    • BitchyPants says:

      Things like this and the Harris Admin. thing are written into the speeches on the teleprompter ON PURPOSE —- Guess Why:
      Then they end up on every conservative website/tv show
      It is part of their strategy – they already have the dem vote
      Don’t fall for it – Just to get his ugly face on every news site

      Liked by 1 person

      • warrprin1 says:

        I think they’re doing it purposefully, in order to prepare and convince the public that the coming bait / switch maneuver is not simply justifiable, but required – under the circumstances of Candidate Joe’s rapidly weakening health condition.

        Liked by 2 people

    • decisiontime16 says:

      The population of the United States…331,399,277 as of Monday, September 14, 2020
      A little over 300 million and of that 200 million will be dead by the time he finishes his diatribe.

      Joe is sick with dementia but what about his supporters?

      Liked by 2 people

    • gabytango says:

      Wonder if his coaches have him raise his voice the way he’s been doing lately to pretend he is firm and in charge of the nonsense he is saying? Very disturbing we are made to watch this clearly displayed cognitive decline.

      Liked by 1 person

      • warrprin1 says:

        Just terrible, gt. During the Primaries, and particularly when Clyburn came to Joe’s rescue, I thought it was all about keeping Bernie out of the picture – again – but via a less mafioso tactic than in 2016.

        It was a theory that I had to toss out. Recently I remembered that the Kenyan had favored KA-MA-LA all along. Without receiving a single vote in any Primary, she is going to be the ‘Rat candidate. The Kenyan has spoken – and nauseatingly – has used, read manipulated, his good old boy, buddy Joe, to pull it off.

        There is no low too low for them to sink in order to reach the coveted goal. Joe appears to be too far into decline to recognize – or care – how he’s being used, by “his friends” – not to mention, by his wife and son.

        Liked by 3 people

      • fionnagh says:

        What is disturbing is that Jill Biden has not put a stop to it, and permitted this in the first place. Biden needs a guardian, generally that would be a spouse.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Kay123 says:

        Gaby… we all know “friendly fingers” Joe…
        is not going to run this country if Joe is elected.

        The enemies… (the real “demon rat” puppeteers)
        the ones who write his speeches, his coaches, his
        doctors, and his “community organizers”…. are the
        real dangers. Some are treasonist nazi’s.

        Liked by 1 person

    • joebkonobi says:

      This is why his wife should be charged with elder abuse. Stress is a major factor on how fast Alzheimer’s progress with those affected.

      Liked by 1 person

  15. A Fortified City says:

    So then, the radical left promises to burn Congress down, shut the country down if Trump tries to appoint a replacement for Ginsberg ??

    Liked by 4 people

    • Shelley Childs says:

      Tammy Bruce (responding to Blumenthal on Twitter) “Or what, you’re gonna burn the cities down? Or what, you’re going to call POTUS a treasonous spy for Russia? Or what, you’re gonna hold up coronavirus relief? Or what, you’re gonna keep major cities shut down economically? Or what, you’re going to keep schools closed? OR WHAT? You’re gonna defund the police? Or what, you’re gonna impeach Trump? Or what, you’re gonna call Trump supporters Nazis? Or what, you’re gonna smear the SCOTUS nom as a gang rapist drug dealer? OR WHAT?!”

      Liked by 20 people

    • riverelf says:

      Can’t say the first threat triggers me all that much, and the second—what, a General Strike of gimmecrats and professional agitators? ‘more, bigger’ riots? storming areas beyond their urban comfort zone?

      The right could shut the country down pretty effectively, on the word of someone like, say, President Trump, but I’m not sure how the left plans to do it. Guess we’ll find out soon enough.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Alex1689 says:

      Looks like the answer is run another impeachment. According to custom (but not, I think, anything in the Constitution itself), all business in the Senate stops once the Articles are delivered by the House to the Senate. So in theory the Senate could not act to confirm a new Justice until it had the trial on the articles of impeachment. Of course, a naked political power play in the House would warrant a similar effort in the Senate, but some of the impeachment procedures are still subject to the filibuster? and that would be a problem perhaps ( unless the Senate just ditched the last remnants of the filibuster.)

      Games upon games. Every tool, every machination, being used.

      Trump should nominate Lagoa on Tuesday unless she’s actually a Justice Roberts in disguise, Mitch should set hearings for two weeks from now, start October 5th. Three days of hearings, move to a vote no later than October 9th.

      She just had hearings less than 18 months ago, no need for long ones now. Let’s see how quickly the Dems can really move and gin up some beach finds scheme.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Patience says:

      ???What are those empty FEMA Camps for

      Liked by 2 people

    • fionnagh says:

      Much of the country remains shut down. As for burning Congress down, well…hmmm.

      Liked by 1 person

  16. Perot Conservative says:

    Liked by 5 people

  17. msidaho says:

    Ruth Bader Ginsberg and the Democrat Party

    I have been mentally comparing RBG with the Democrat party. (I know there is a term for this, but I can’t think of it)
    – Ruth was OLD – Most ‘leaders’ in the Democrat party are OLD
    – Ruth was sick – As POTUS says about Democrats “These people are sick”
    – RBG’s cancer had metastasized – The socialist/cancer that has infected the democrat party has metastasized
    – RBG has been dying for quite awhile – When our VSG P DJT was elected I read a nice piece re: the demise of the Democrat party
    – RBG has died (aint none of us getting out of here alive) – as we watch the Democrats talking and taking actions which presage their demise (?)

    So, I see her last days full of hate and thwarting all efforts to live as good a retirement as possible as the embodiment of today’s Democrat party.

    Am i wrong?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. PaulCohen says:

    Biden blunders again!!!!! The man is unfit…. says “200 million will die of Covid by the time I finish this talk.”

    His poor brain is so confused….

    Liked by 2 people

  19. PaulCohen says:

    Biden blunders again!!!!! The man is unfit…. says “200 million will die of Covid by the time I finish this talk.”

    His poor brain is so confused….

    Liked by 1 person

  20. PaulCohen says:

    Biden blunders again!!!!! The man is unfit…. says “200 million will die of Covid by the time I finish this talk.”

    His poor brain is so confused….


  21. Just in time to “drop-out” of the debates?
    or is Sleepy Joe honestly sick?

    Liked by 2 people

  22. NJF says:

    Makes me proud of my fellow Long Islanders!!

    Liked by 9 people

  23. Alex1689 says:

    Another development to expect in the “October surprise” category – although it should not be a surprise at all – is some sort of major strike at Iran’s military capabilities. Seeing reports Iran will have enough fissile material to put a nuclear bomb together by year’s end, not to mention that Russia and China are either now or about to be out from under UN restrictions on arms sales to Iran.

    No way PDJT allows Iran to get a nuke on his watch.

    Someone set off a series of bombs in and around Iranian military bases and nuke development areas a few weeks ago. No one claimed credit.

    Expect more of that.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. cliffaheadwolvesbehind says:

    I just happened to see the parade and it was amazing.
    Thousands of President Trump supporters happy, cheering and having a great time.
    On Long Island of all places.
    Couldn’t believe it!!!!

    Liked by 4 people

    • StanH says:

      But John Roberts told us that there are no Obama, Bush judges just judges interpreting the law, like Judge Sullivan right?

      This incestuous den of thieves thrives on BS.

      Liked by 2 people

    • gsonFIT says:

      This is literally a national security issue. These Chinese companies create profiles that influence social media based on user data from these aps. I am not talking about selling and or data mining. I am talking about military psy-ops via AI. I am talking about rerouting police from crime scenes. This is very real and very dangerous

      This judge should loose his seat at the bench.

      Liked by 1 person

  25. Henry says:

    Did she really act this Way?

    Liked by 5 people

  26. WeThePeople2016 says:


    Liked by 2 people

  27. WhiteBoard says:

    this is what the President is temporarily having us see. THEY ARE REAL, they WILL COME FOR YOU… if we dont see them

    Liked by 2 people

  28. StanH says:

    Michael Moore: Shut Down Govt to Stop Trump SCOTUS Pick

    Take to the Streets — Be Ruthless

    If the levy does break Tubby, you will be one of the first run to ground along with your Hollywood comrades, Meathead, Hanoi Jane et al.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. OH Lordy! Can you imagine the hell he is bringing down on any GOP Senator who they think can be threatened, tortured, kidnapped, browbeaten or ricin-ed into submission.

    Liked by 2 people

  30. OH Lordy! Can you imagine the hell he is bringing down on any GOP Senator who they think can be threatened, tortured, kidnapped, browbeaten or ricin-ed into submission.


  31. burnett044 says:

    Good American Patriots …have had enuff of this…..look for it to increase they are desperate now.


  32. burnett044 says:

    from…..protest etc…..from yesterday…..ff to Portland near half way….

    Liked by 1 person

  33. sunnydaze says:

    Not NAZIs at all. Thank a Democrat.


  34. Tornarosa says:

    Free2313 was kind enough to transcribe a quote from PDJT at the NC Rally yesterday.

    Trump said Saturday that he had approved a transaction between Oracle Corp., Walmart Inc. and ByteDance Ltd. to create a new company called TikTok Global to run the U.S. video-sharing app. As part of the arrangement, Trump told reporters at the White House the companies agreed to contribute $5 billion to an education foundation.

    Later, during a campaign rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina, Trump said “we’re going to be setting up a very large fund for the education of American youth.”

    He told his rally audience that in conversation with leaders of the companies, he said “do me a favor, could you put up $5 billion into a fund for education, so we can educate people as to real history of our country — the real history, not the fake history.”

    This illustrates the fundamental difference between our Pres and Sleepy Joe. Biden would have asked Tik Tok Global to hire Hunter…

    Liked by 2 people

  35. A Fortified City says:

    Did big dummy Pelosi finally awaken from her slumber to condemn violent protest, Crazy Nancy you’ll a late your anarchist army is totally out of control now


    • Nepanyrush says:

      Which one is she protesting. Maybe the one in Philadelphia where they surround a car with a dog in it and use a hammer to break the glass, terrifying the family and the poor dog. I don’t suppose PETA will condemn it.

      Liked by 3 people

  36. burnett044 says:

    a couple of guys went to the small town of Madison NC with FU@K the cops sign….
    if you go to about 3forth the way thru this vid you will see the reaction of the towns folk…


  37. Carrie says:

    Ricin suspect apprehended..

    Liked by 3 people

  38. WhiteBoard says:

    Jan – 4 days after Flynn FBI setup inteview (2017)
    Yates visits the FARA – they WERE HUNTING for ways to commit Treason.

    When this didnt work – they masked murder – under a virus (yet no democrat is screaming at China for it getting loose)


  39. SJM says:


    Posted on September 20, 2020, at 1:01 p.m. ET

    A huge trove of secret government documents reveals for the first time how the giants of Western banking move trillions of dollars in suspicious transactions, enriching themselves and their shareholders while facilitating the work of terrorists, kleptocrats, and drug kingpins.

    And the US government, despite its vast powers, fails to stop it.

    Today, the FinCEN Files — thousands of “suspicious activity reports” and other US government documents — offer an unprecedented view of global financial corruption, the banks enabling it, and the government agencies that watch as it flourishes. BuzzFeed News has shared these reports with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and more than 100 news organizations in 88 countries.

    These documents, compiled by banks, shared with the government, but kept from public view, expose the hollowness of banking safeguards, and the ease with which criminals have exploited them. Profits from deadly drug wars, fortunes embezzled from developing countries, and hard-earned savings stolen in a Ponzi scheme were all allowed to flow into and out of these financial institutions, despite warnings from the banks’ own employees.


  40. Patriot1783 says:

    What an absolutely horrible person danang dick is….awful.
    I will never understand anyone who supports him…they are no better..good for Tammy and the others for eviscerating him in public. There have been times I’ve had to be at public events where he is…if he comes near my area I move. I make it a point to never be in a group photo with him or any CT State/Fed politician.

    Liked by 2 people

  41. Bubby says:

    Finally someone expressed what I believed all along that Justice Ginsberg was an “obedient puppet for the liberal agenda” ideology over law ideology over the Constitution!

    Liked by 6 people

  42. sunnyflower5 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  43. rondo123456 says:

    Confirm a Justice Now

    This is no time for Senate Republicans to go wobbly.


  44. laeagle says:

    Time for Barr to make the “i” in justice count with indictments!

    Liked by 1 person

  45. LBB says:

    Riacin sender arrested. From the AP

    “The woman was taken into custody by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers and is expected to face federal charges, the officials said.

    The letter addressed to the White House appeared to have originated in Canada, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have said. It was intercepted at a government facility that screens mail addressed to the White House and President Donald Trump and a preliminary investigation indicated it tested positive for ricin, according to the officials.

    The officials were not authorized to discuss the ongoing investigation publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.”


  46. A2 says:

    This past week the CCP is in a warmongering MO trolling a la DPRK.. Besides threatening to invade Taiwan and assassinate the President of Taiwan, an editorial from the Global Slimes👇

    Fatty Kim would be proud👇

    Chinese air force video simulates attack on US military base for the first time


    “ A video released by China’s air force on its official WeChat account showing the simulation of a bomber aircraft attacking a U.S. military base in Guam is set to further deepen tensions between the two countries.
    The video posted on Saturday has drawn the immediate attention of the international community as it is the first time the People’s Liberation Army has displayed visuals targeting a U.S. military facility.
    The footage includes real-life recordings and 3D animations showing the entire process of an attack mission by the H-6K bomber aircraft. The video begins with the bomber preparing for takeoff at the PLA’s air force base, before it approaches and secures a target, then fires a missile. A huge fireball is shown in the video as smoke emerges from the bombsite after the airstrike. The H-6K then safely returns to the base under the cover of several J-11 jet fighters.”

    Read more here👇

    Hollyweird 🤬


  47. Cathie says:

    This cracks me up…Sky News in Australia–moderators obviously pro Trump and making fun of Biden.

    Liked by 3 people

    • gabytango says:

      Amongst many other jabs at the horrible US Media, this one about Joe Biden putting a “Lid” on the next day’s events after RBG’s passing….

      First Announcer: “This is how bad they are, the Democrats, while Trump is out there giving rallies and talking about this, the day after RBG dies, there’s going to be a huge political fight, his (Biden’s) campaign puts out an announcement at 8:30am, there will be no further events or statements for the day, Biden was having the day off!”

      Second Announcer: “Of course he did and guess what James….well, Joe Biden will be having the next 4 years off, and will have plenty of time to spend in his basement then.

      BWAHAHAHA! They GET it, they really, really GET it!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s