Lou Dobbs Interviews Sidney Powell on Today’s Oral Arguments….

Sidney Powell did an excellent job today representing the interests of her client Michael Flynn at the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.  Every client should be so fortunate. Following the hearing, Ms. Powell appears with Lou Dobbs to discuss the overall issues.

The Great Lou Dobbs represents the voices of millions in this interview as he shares his own perspective of outrage at the ongoing case.  Terrific interview:

This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Activist Judges, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, Lawfare, media bias, Phase 1, Phase 2, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Tripwires, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

281 Responses to Lou Dobbs Interviews Sidney Powell on Today’s Oral Arguments….

  1. corvairfan says:

    Anxiously awaiting any comment from Sundance regarding Lou Dobb’s statement that Durham investigation is going to be a whitewash. I would typically ignore it, but Lou Dobbs is solid.

    Liked by 4 people

    • WillRoll says:

      Lou may or may not have gotten the SD briefing, but if he did he didn’t also get the “live your best life” briefing. That’s alright. Truth will win. And Lou is def on our side.

      Liked by 2 people

    • jus wundrin says:

      He said it ‘looks’ like its going to be a whitewash. I just take that as his opinion, and since like any of us who has been down the same path over and over again of seeing no results of previous ‘investigations’, hes probably just as exasperated as the rest of us.

      The bottom line is that only a few people know how Durhams criminal investigation will unfold, and Dobbs. like the rest of us, doesnt really know how things will turn out in the end. Expect the worst, but hope for the best.

      Liked by 5 people

      • cali says:

        @jus wundrin: ^^^^^^^^^ this!

        The secret weapon in favor of Flynn is none other than Joe Pientka!
        There was a blip of a statement a while back although not available any longer where it said that Joe Pientka was indeed asked to change his original 302 to make it appear that Flynn lied.
        Rather than doing that he secretly reported to the IG that they wanted him to lie. He refused to do that. Whatever happened after that one can only wonder and I am convinced that the same Pientka is also a witness in the Durham probe ergo no further info forthcoming.
        Having said that I have hope that this original 302 exists in its original form as Pientka wrote it.
        Since than Pientka has been transferred numerous time to different location by Wray.

        In the end Flynn will be vindicated and his 302 will make it to Flynn and Powell as Durham wraps up his case.

        A pardon will not do justice to Flynn as it would keep the criminality of all involved secret. He deserves to be vindicated.

        God always wins despite delays, delays and more delays as each step exposed the rotten judicial systems and judges.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Pooch says:

      Nunes response to that.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. islandpalmtrees says:

    I wonder,

    A warning, to the All Panel Hearing On Flynn Today, or did Schrage conscience bother him

    A CIA person surfaces, because a clear warning was needed.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Heavy Mecha says:

      How and why was the guy recording another without permission, unless its a government spook operation? So obvious that certain elements, senate etc are carving out the fbi. Now comes along some spook with coincidentally ‘random’ recording. Within 30 minutes both senate and cia carved out the fall guys starting with halper and the fbi. Hah!

      Liked by 2 people

      • Wethal says:

        Some states do not require the consent of both parties to tape a conversation. (assuming it is not transmitted over the airwaves, but done with something like a dictaphone or a phone set only to record. Airwaves brings in the feds.).

        Liked by 1 person

      • regitiger says:

        schrage stated that he recorded it with consent.

        halper was not his mentor

        halper was his handler…same cia spook operatives.

        the purpose of making this public now was to control the narrative and be first…and that is a well known tradcraft for insulating and misinformation techniques.

        i provided comments earlier about this…m.bartiromo wittingly or not allowed a conspirator to televise a audio recording on a very relevant target of future and ongoing investigations..this was a huge boneheaded mistake….for lots of legal reasons that have wheels haller can argue successfully, this record cannot be used against him.

        we will have to go about dealing justice to these two with other records…that audio is now off the table…

        very smart play…that schrade puke is not to be underestimated.

        if doj doesnt understand the need to slap indictment on him right now and put a stop to this campaign to stopgap and insulate then a large scope of corruptors are going to walk free and clear.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Jan says:

        That July 12, 2018 letter from the DOJ to the FISA Court threw the FBI under the bus, too.

        Everybody throwing each other under the bus is funny, but it’s time to pick up the toys & start indicting/jailing.

        Like

      • fabrabbit says:

        Harper was Schrage’s “advisor” Schrage & Halper agreed that Schrage could record their conversations because (according to Schrage) Halper was erratic and gave him conflicting direction. Pretty clever, right? If true, did Halper (the Walrus) remember he was being recorded?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Paprika says:

          I view Schrage about as trustworthy and truthful as Halper! Which of course means; Not at all.

          Liked by 1 person

        • jaggggg says:

          Halper didn’t sound out of it by any means. It also seems all too convenient that Halper only suggests Flynn might cross someone (as he did Obama) and then get pushed out. I don’t see how anyone can pin down what Halper says here as evidence he knew Flynn was soon getting entrapped. If anything, it would be awfully convenient for this conversation to arise so as to “refute” evidence from another source that Halper indeed indicated to someone else he actually knew of the plot against Flynn.

          Liked by 1 person

      • devilman96 says:

        I’m not giving the political deep stater any credit but… He explained that he was recording Halper because Halper was all over the place flakey and could not / did not focus on his PhD needs so he began recording their conversations, with knowledge.

        Like

    • Heavy Mecha says:

      Within 30 minutes this past sunday morning, the senate and cia carved out the fall guys starting with halper and the fbi.

      Otherwise we are to believe that its normal for phd candidates to secretly record their advisors.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Issy says:

      islandpalmtrees: I don’t trust Schrage at all. He must not have a conscious or he wouldn’t have kept silent while Flynn was framed. I don’t understand what you mean by his coming forward now would a warning to the appellant panel on the Flynn case.

      Like

  3. borwarrior says:

    Explain please how Sullivan can bring the “hammer down” when the DOJ dropped the case?

    How can a judge render a verdict when there is no prosecutor charging a crime?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Wethal says:

      The goal is not now to railroad Flynn and get himn out of the White House so he can’t audit the intelligence agencies and can’t tell Trump about the secret Iran side deals (Flynn probably did the latter by backchannels by now).

      The goal now is to have some kind of fishing expedition by Sullivan and Gleeson to give the DNC ammo for the fall “Trump has politicized the DOJ” campaign.

      Even if Sullvan doesn’t get a chance to question any DOJ officials, as long as this is alive, the “politicized DOJ” campaign can continue.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mr e-man says:

        I agree but Barr also has “secret” evidence that could change all that. But he doesn’t supply it. He is holding it, rightly or wrongly, for current or future investigations, or prosecutions.

        Or he is running out the clock.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Ken Lawson says:

          If Barr has other evidence, it sounds like it’s probably part of the Durham investigation and to release it now for the Flynn cases could mess up prosecutions Durham is planning. My guess is that if Durham does finish his investigation and indict people, then the additional evidence for Flynn will come out and that will give Flynn’s case the ability to be shut down because it will be so overwhelming. My guess is that the evidence may have something to do with proof that the FBI set up Flynn, which is something that has never been talked about in court in Flynn’s case..

          Like

      • Issy says:

        Wethal: Right after the doj made the motion to dismiss the case, Sullivan made noises about charging Flynn with perjury. This was just a day or so after Obama said Flynn committed perjury. I don’t think he can do that as there is no prosecutor to bring the charges, but with Sullivan, who knows.

        I have read Sullivan can charge Flynn with contempt of court. For what, taking a plea deal? what is the punishment?

        Like

        • 1nikao says:

          Sullican is Obama/Lawfare’s “Hand.”
          He is protecting them. He is protecting the first half-black President’s legacy by prosecuting an innocent man without a prosecutor.
          Seems pretty Affirmative Action-y to me.
          Thanks, guys.
          You’re not doing this right.

          Like

        • regitiger says:

          it is a dubious judicial play.

          according to sully world…a person who reverses a guilty plea before sentencing phase can be subject to contempt of court. the nature of such a charge is quite significant. it literally gives the court, this judge, the exclusive nearly unlimited power to hold flynn in jail until …whatever period of time this judge feels necessary to induce the guilty party to change his position. its a nuclear power and this judge has already announced it in court on record as a very real possibility.

          now you might be thinking…no way…thats insane…but its the reality. us laws allows for this power and its been used before.

          of course, given the facts laid out clearly it would not be appropriate and correct, the only remedy to prevent sullivan from excercising this power is a higher court or appeals that would correct such actions.

          this is why powell went in early with the writ mandamus to the appeals court…she is trying correctly to prevent this judge from making that obviously evil and corrupt decision.

          i do not have a good feeling about how this dc appeals court is going to act…my sense is that they seem more interested in allowing sullivan to make a ruling on the motion to dismiss and then entertain a writ of mandamus from defense. legally this makes sense…

          however within the same writ of mandamus are two other matters, one involving a strong argument that sullivan be removed for judicial misconduct, animus and also unlawfully,acquiring third party amicus who has also showed animus about this political case.

          i would like to believe that the dc appeals court should determine that sullivan has not performed in a fair and objective manner befiting a federal circuit judgemand certainly that this has severe direct consequences to both flynn and also to the interests of law and the us people. in a normal functioning main justice this would be a no brained and sullivan is recused from the case ans another judge rules on the matter of motion to dismiss.

          right now however, sullivan remains in full control of this court and flynns life…tomorrow he could drop the nuke and have him jailed for contempt..

          regardless if he does that or not, the threat of it is very real…and that also becomes just another issue that will almost certain.y be used by this corrupt judge to delay this case and thus continue the persecution of flynn…which is meant to humiliate and antagonize trump before this election.

          and of course, flynn languishing in a threatened position and in a unusualy spot still effectively a guilty party keeps the ruse going for the corruptors that he is a traitor.

          its all very ugly…evil. and perverted.

          sullivans actions in such a public and political way have destroyed any illusions about the extent and tentacles of the conspiracy and coup…its far more broad and deep than any swamp anyone can imagine.

          this election outome is in fact the most consequential in all of us history…

          what we do now and leading up to the election will determine our liberties.

          one would do well to truly reconcile and get right with god

          Like

    • jus wundrin says:

      Because of a two tiered just-us system that exists in what was formally known as the US of A.

      Like

    • richard verney says:

      Because if President Trump does not win in November, there will be a new DOJ, in January, who will wish to push ahead with the Flynn prosecution, and to prosecute the former President Trump, and any of his supporters that they can frame up.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Raptors2020 says:

      The sad truth is the process has become the punishment. Most cases end in plea deals because the system has the power to punish you by just following procedure, and going as slow as they choose. Every poor person knows this, only the middle-class who watch “Matlock” or “Perry Mason” and think it’s real don’t get it.

      Judge Sullivan may achieve the landmark feat of turning the de facto truth that the process is the punishment into the law. It would certainly increase, or formalize the power of judges. Are we sure the appeals court judges wouldn’t like that?

      The Constitution promises a speedy trial (6th Amendment). It actually uses the casual word speedy. Well, the 800-pound gorilla in every courtroom is the obvious truth that almost no one gets a speedy trial; there must be powerful forces at work to deny that principle of justice to the American public.

      So much quotidian rhetoric about justice and fairness and human rights, but instead of speedy trials we get vandalized statues.

      Liked by 3 people

    • dayallaxeded says:

      Flynn already pleaded guilty. Under wrongful duress, extortion, and with conflicted counsel, but the plea is in the record. If Sulliedvan denies Flynn’s motion to withdraw his plea and DOinJ’s motion to dismiss, Sulliedvan goes directly to sentencing. Then Flynn’s only recourse, I think, would be habeas corpus or 1983.

      Like

  4. Awesome Patriot says:

    Slowly red pill non – believers a little bit at a time.

    Like

  5. OffCourseNation says:

    Once upon a time Russia was the Evil Empire. Now, thanks to the ‘Deep State’, we are the Evil Empire. If Joe Biden is elected, it will only get worse. Although there is already not much room left.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hugh Jass says:

      If you look at current history, taking place right now, Russia, Poland, and Hungary (there are a few other countries as well) are the ONLY ONES standing up for actual Christian values.

      Liked by 3 people

      • OffCourseNation says:

        “Christians in Syria are more vulnerable than ever before with the government in danger of collapsing. The Syrian government has been the one to protect minority groups, including Christians. If the Syrian government were to lose power to the Islamic State, not only would there be hundreds of thousands more refugees, but tens and tens of thousands more would be slaughtered by ISIS. Russian President Vladimir Putins policies to uphold Syrias government might save Christian lives. Pray for the Christians in Syria.”
        – Rev. Franklin Graham (Sep 30, 2015)

        “Russias Putin Jet Fighters Are Pulverizing Muslim Terrorists. Putin Wins Obama Loses. So why is the U.S. complaining about Russia for bombarding these broad alliance of hardline Islamist groups, which includes both Jabhat al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham? What is most embarrassing for the U.S. is that these seized the very weapons from U.S.-supplied so-called secular rebels as a result of Americas botched train-and-supply program. The Russians are basically trying to correct Obamas stupid mistakes. America cant complain because its al Qaeda and thats who this war is supposed to be against. It is for this reason I say For Putin I loved and Obama I hated!
        – Walid Shoebat [Sep 29, 2015]

        Liked by 3 people

  6. J Gottfred says:

    At this point, being uncertain of the outcome there is only one thing to do:
    Donate! We gotta believe in them!

    Receipt for your donation to Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn Legal Defense Fund Trust

    Receipt for your donation to The Last Refuge

    Do it now; do it right now!

    Liked by 2 people

  7. repsort says:

    why doesn’t Trump put an end to this bullshit?
    NOW?

    Like

    • Mortimer says:

      Because issuing a pardon at this point is dumb.

      A pardon makes Flynn guilty for life and was given a free pass by his buddy Trump.

      They are baiting him to do it.

      Liked by 7 people

  8. islandpalmtrees says:

    Anyone – connected to the CIA by chance?

    General Michael Flynn Hearing Before DC Circuit Court of Appeals

    Liked by 1 person

    • Issy says:

      Islandpalmtrees: Why do you ask? Quite frankly after listening to them for 4 hrs, I’m not sure the cia would have any use for any of them. How about Mr. Hypothetical Wilkins?

      Liked by 1 person

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        Was Schrage sending a warning, to All of the members on the Panel at Flynn’s Hearing , or did Schrage conscience bother him Realizing that Schrage is CIA.

        Reference posting above for more detail, Issy.

        Like

      • William the Comptroller says:

        We taxpayers pay these SuperSmart Legal Eagles to help write law….yet even when the law is direct in its specific meaning on paper, these same pompous jerks try to make things that are very clear and direct into nebulous emanations of verbal diarrhea and try to reframe every argument and nuance to confuse and confound actual Justice. So in the end, the People have really no idea what the various laws and statutes actual means vs what it says on paper, thus have to hedge against this lack of confidence in the System to not be liable for things a reasonable person would believe to be relevant in the course of their actions.

        Of course Chief Robert’s stupid ruling on Obamacare II (King v Burwell) threw out decades of bedrock normal practice of “what is written, it is what it means” to now the “standard” of “oh, well, the legislators really did not mean it that way and instead the bureaucrat writing the text will be in charge of what the legislator meant”. If a passed bill had an simple error, it was the practice for the bill to go back and have the Congress vote to correct the error. Not any more. The point in the SCOTUS case was that the drafters of Obamacare ASSUMED all the States would pony up any set up some sort of Medicare mechanism ( I forget exactly)…..but several states did not…which would have thrown the whole plan into a tailspin. So Roberts Saved the Day…again.

        Of course, now that ruling is “Precedence”, all following decisions have to use that flawed foundation to build a tower of new decisions……. and of course, a faulty foundation in the end causes collapse. Just think of the prior boneheaded/wrong/sloppy rulings of the Court for which we are still paying the price.

        It was as if the En Banq judges yesterday were just showing off to their insular cloistered colleagues on how “brilliant” they are with rattling off “edgy” hypotheticals… rather than see a bloody simple case right before their eyes. It is similar to the phenomenon in the medical field called “VIPitis”; a doctor may tend to go overboard with diagnostic tests when treating a VIP/celebrity/world leader for a relatively simple malady or condition so as to not be proven incompetent if they miss something and then everyone will know about in the news….and get the crap sued out of them….. and those tests come back with some ambiguous finding… leading to more tests, some of which might be invasive, and possibly exploratory surgeries which then cause iatrogenic injury. This is then compounded by the sometimes “over-demanding” expectations of perfection and fast treatment by the VIP patient that works against the doctor’s well-honed experience and their impulse to NOT do something, sometimes after the tough lesson of a prior experience in which the patient had a bad outcome and they do not ever wish to repeat that with a new patient.

        Liked by 1 person

  9. Randolph Scott says:

    We do not have to burn it down, but we would need to feed the bastards 308 pills. Lots of them.

    Like

  10. leavemygunsalone says:

    I don’t know. What I do know is the I am praying for General Flynn and his family. It breaks my heart.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Mr e-man says:

      He has no prosecutor. It’s done. If they want to prosecute Barr, that doesn’t include Flynn. He will eventually be cleared. It’s just a matter of time, which is shameful to our system of justice.

      I think 10 days to write their opinions. Then another 10 days to dismiss. Sullivan could appeal any adverse decision to the SC.That may add a few weeks. SC wont take this up when they return in October. That still won’t get them to the election.

      If they give it back to Sullivan, he could delay hearings but probably not thru October. He could accept the guilty plea and sentence Flynn. I am not sure that would be legal but he has done a lot that is on the boundaries of legal. That conviction and appeal could last another year.

      We can hope this ends by labor day.

      Liked by 2 people

      • fabrabbit says:

        Can Sullivan appeal to the SC? He has no standing.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Paprika says:

          He did not have any standing to bring in amicus opinions or to go to appeals court en blanc , but he did, and here we are. It would seem that the law itself no longer means anything except for how you choose to interpret the certain parts and pieces you choose to examine.

          Why would these appellate court “justices” continually bring up hypothetical possibilities that have nothing to do with the case before them instead of just examining the laws and how they apply to THIS case? Each and every case is supposed to be decided on it’s own merits by the facts presented in that case by the prosecutor and defense counsel–period.

          And what we have now is a bunch of black robes playing games with the process when there is no longer even a case–the case was dropped/withdrawn by the prosecution. There is nothing to decide because there is no case.

          General Flynn has been royally screwed by the FBI, the DoJ, His 1st legal team, and the judiciary. May God have mercy on all their souls, I sure as heck don’t!

          Liked by 2 people

      • cofvevern says:

        Labor Day??? I watched the hearing. At the end of the hearing the guy in charge said, “We’ll convene on December 9th.”

        Like

      • Issy says:

        Mr. e-man; You are not sure that would be legal. That’s funny. If anything about this farce was “legal” the court would not have had an en banc hearing. The court should dismiss the case itself.

        Sullivan has had two chances and he is not going to dismiss without having a three ring circus. He has already accused Flynn of treason, maybe he will accuse Barr of bribery. I don’t know who he will get to investigate or prosecute, but since he has already made himself a party to the case and has his own lawyer, why can’t he subpoena witnesses and hire investigators.

        Like

  11. johnnyfandango says:

    Can we get back to the evidence as well as the evidence that was purposely hidden that exonerates Flynn. All these hypotheticals by these judges is nothing but faculty room, lawyer bs speak. ”The cloud of Law” Fact is the FBI was not going to pursue Flynn, Obama forced a change, the FBI lied, falsified evidence, hid evidence from the defense, framed Flynn, there were conflicts of interest on his original defense team, SC team, FBI team and Judge. All these fckers should be removed, have their legal licenses taken away and incarcerated. All this case information is all public now. I know what I see with my own eyes. This is not justice and not ”who we are” as a country. GET IT DONE.

    Liked by 4 people

    • KT Prayer Warrior says:

      I was hoping Me Powell or Wall would turn that hypothetical into a judge getting the briefcase full of money on cell phone footage and ignoring all last judicial process…..

      I would not have cared if they pretended to be too thick in the head to understand the hypothetical, cuz it was an incredibly weak one.

      Liked by 1 person

  12. hawkins6 says:

    Sidney is still “Lady Justice of the USA” and Lou is still great.

    Did I here the Court Clerk correctly at the end of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals hearing. She said, the court is adjourned until December 9th.

    I assume they will announce their rulings long before then.

    Like

  13. Cocoon says:

    Trump stated clearly our Judicial System has become political. Chief Justice Roberts felt the need to publicly state this was not true.
    Anybody listening to this Hearing could tell in over 80% of the questions, which Party nominated which Judge.
    It confirms Trumps statement and will make this election all about who selects the next Supreme Court Justice.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. DefenderOfTroyDonahue says:

    An update on “The Hope Emerson Story” …. the Hollywood producers originally had the idea of offering Sidney Powell the title role, but they scrapped that in favor of hiring a professional actress. But now they’ve run into the big problem which movie producers always face … raising money. The whole project is now on the shelf and may never come off it. We won’t be seeing “The Hope Emerson Story” anytime soon and Sidney will never be a part of it, thank goodness.

    Like

  15. hawkins6 says:

    Devin Nunes’ no holds barred comments on the Corrupt Federal Judiciary, Obama judges and those appointed by President Trump. This excellent interview followed Sidney’s interview with Lou.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Paprika says:

      This was a very good interview for only being 7:51 minutes. Nunes hits hard and Dobbs allows him time to do so. And Lou’s wrap up statement to Nunes’ thoughts on whether it will be a whitewash or not encompasses my thoughts about Durham’s investigation.

      Dobbs: ” I certainly hope that I am as wrong as I could possible be(about it being a whitewash) and that you are as every bit as right as the COUNTRY NEEDS YOU TO BE!” – emphasis is mine.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Issy says:

        Paprika: Glad he had the guts to call the courts and judges corrupt. I don’t think Trump has even gone there, but it’s true. All the judges remain glacially silent as this travesty with Flynn proceeds.

        Liked by 1 person

  16. toothpick says:

    persecuted not prosecuted pretty much sums it up

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Misha Berra says:

    July 13, 2016 – CNN
    Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s well-known candor was on display in her chambers late Monday, when she declined to retreat from her earlier criticism of Donald Trump and even elaborated on it.
    “He is a faker,” she said of the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, going point by point, as if presenting a legal brief. “He has no consistency about him. He says whatever comes into his head at the moment. He really has an ego. …

    https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/politics/justice-ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump-faker/index.html

    Based on Supreme Court’s RBG ability to speak out – why can’t any member of the Supreme Court make a statement about this Judge Sullivan’s not playing by the rules – the laws of the
    USA – or have they been bought off too?! I’ve never seen RBG recuse herself from any of the
    President’s cases – have you?

    Liked by 1 person

  18. phillipk78 says:

    Listening to the exchange between Judge Merrick Garland and Jeffrey Wall it is clear that we dodged a bullet there.

    Liked by 5 people

  19. Sonia says:

    How much of this Free Thought Project article is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory or Rep Nunes’ damning conclusions.?

    While six companies controlling most everything the Western world consumes in regard to media may sound like a sinister arrangement, the Swiss Propaganda Research center (SPR) has just released information that is even worse. The research group was able to tie all these media companies to a single organization—the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

    Liked by 3 people

  20. Cowz says:

    Once this is over can Flynn file a civil suit against the court, more specifically Sullivan?

    Like

    • Issy says:

      No. I’m not a lawyer but I know the doj has made settlements to people they have targeted and framed. There should be some civil recourse against the department, but not individual agents, prosecutors or judges.

      He should have a good case against the Covington law firm that should have withdrawn from the case because they had a conflict.

      There were some news reports that called him a spy and a traitor, but that gets iffy as he was a public figure. I guess that was where Sullivan got his information.

      Like

  21. TwoLaine says:

    I will say it again, and again, and again, this is just as bad as what DIRTY LYING WEASEL COMEY did, usurping the powers of the DOJ and proclaiming ILLary untryable, after having yet another SHAM of a public funded “investigation” into the Clinton Crime Cabal.

    Mas ya’ wonder… Was the unrecorder “interview” of ILLary a meeting to conspire against Candidate/Nominee TRUMP? Was the Steele dossier delivery discussed? Perfect opportunity, inder the guise of an “investigation”. Or was that all determined at the airport meet and greet between Lynch and BILLary.

    Like

  22. Mark Bermingham says:

    I believe Federal Agents have been misusing and abusing NSA databases for years and a lot of folks knew about it.

    When they legitimately couldn’t find evidence on a target/subject, they circumvented the law and “spied on them”. With the “newfound” evidence, they then continued their cases with other legitimate evidence. “Confidential Informants” i.e. 302’s, 702’s, upstream and downstream data collection covered their tracks.

    If you were an agent and assigned a bad guy but couldn’t garner evidence….. and had a Nellie Ohr type contractor on speed dial, would you call to “get your man”? I would NOT but obviously there are hundreds that would make the call.

    I find myself wondering more often, if it’s CoVid that is letting prisoners go home or a DOJ cover up to right so many wrong incarcerations.

    Liked by 2 people

  23. Rick says:

    The US is under a multipronged attack against the Constitution by lawfare,
    Against our health by big pharma and monsanto,
    Against our Faith by selected quarantines against churches, and singing,
    Against our persons by riots and unhinged thieves, rapists and murderers.

    Have we entered the Tribulation?

    China’s massive flooding wiped out their crops which many Countries rely on. Could we be entering the phase of famines and pestilence?

    Liked by 4 people

  24. 4*Freedom says:

    Why does Flynn so terrify the Left that even judges lay their reputations on the line to keep him in am American-style gestapo? Why judicially muzzle him until election is over? As the nation’s premier intelligence expert who planned to audit intelligence systems he could quickly finger seditionists and big-titled criminals exploiting power….couldn’t he?

    Liked by 1 person

    • canoehustler says:

      What started as most likely McCabe revenge snowballed into something they have to cover up. I find it hard to believe that one person could be that pivotal to topping the jenga stack. Top level guys rarely know the full picture of the corruption. That’s my opinion. Mike Roger’s is the exception, not the rule.

      Liked by 2 people

    • canoehustler says:

      What started as most likely McCabe revenge snowballed into something they have to cover up. I find it hard to believe that one person could be that pivotal to topping the jenga stack. Top level guys rarely know the full picture of the corruption. That’s my opinion. Mike Roger’s is the exception, not the rule.

      Like

    • canoehustler says:

      What started as most likely McCabe revenge snowballed into something they have to cover up. I find it hard to believe that one person could be that pivotal to topping the jenga stack. Top level guys rarely know the full picture of the corruption. That’s my opinion. Mike Roger’s is the exception, not the rule.

      Like

  25. 4*Freedom says:

    No. No plan to relax before results.

    Like

  26. Michael Fink says:

    Why can’t I watch the video?

    Like

  27. Donata says:

    August 15th can’t get here soon enough. I totally trust you Sundance. Let it begin.

    Like

  28. corvairfan says:

    Posted this upstream a little but thought I’d make put it somewhere more visible.

    For those holding out hope that FBI Supervisor Joe Pientka might be a good guy. Doesn’t sound too good.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/01/dark-and-dirty-fbi-agent-joe-pientka-and-wife-living-the-high-life-after-he-set-up-general-flynn-forcing-flynn-to-sell-his-house-to-pay-for-legal-fees/

    Like

  29. Richard says:

    We will all hear about the ( alleged) violent , criminal, disgusting behaviour by the Judges son ( Emmit jr.) circa 2012 soon.
    Alleged sex, violence, obstruction — or as it is called in DC. ” JUST YOUR AVERAGE LAWLESSNESS WITH NO CONSEQUENCES “. Judges son ” walks” , ( with Daddys interference ) while Flynns son ( innocent) is extortion bait. Watch for the three eyed raven to unload this true story soon .

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s