Devin Nunes Discusses Testimony of Sally Yates…

HPSCI ranking member Devin Nunes appears on Fox News with Liz MacDonald to discuss the testimony of former Deputy AG Sally Yates.

This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Abusive Cops, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Lawfare, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

387 Responses to Devin Nunes Discusses Testimony of Sally Yates…

  1. dunewall says:

    Interesting Ms. Lindsey leads Yates by asking if Comey had ‘gone rogue’ which she, of course, took the hint and said yes. Objection, leading the witness. Sustained.

    Liked by 10 people

    • 4gypsybreeze says:

      And she didn’t go “rogue” when she refused to carry out the orders of her Commander in Chief and got fired for insubordination?

      What a strange term for Ms. Lindsey to use when questioning her- of all people.

      Guess it could be a case of—it takes one to know one.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Fubu says:

        Or more like the fix is in. It really sucks that we’ve been educated by Sundance because now we can see the BS a mile away. Lindsey we’re talking about you.

        Liked by 6 people

        • serrafeena says:

          Graham seems giddy in the process of taking down Comey as a way to seem like a caped crusader. Yea Graham, you’re a real hero. Go get ‘em. Thug life and all that. Ba bam💥. Lindsey Graham could be in a pit of Saw-Scaled Viper snakes and they’d convince him he’s a hero for going hard after the rodent.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Jan says:

          WE KNOW!!!

          Liked by 2 people

        • swampfox999 says:

          Politicians, apparatchiks and fakers exist in a shallow world of illusion and manipulation and cannot therefore recognize others not so motivated. But they recognize each other instantaneously. Lindsay and Sally are a case in point.

          Like

      • Robert Smith says:

        Sally would say “no” and then it’d be time to point out judges disagreed strongly with her legal and personal opinions. Which cast all her actions as suspect including carving out NSD.

        Liked by 3 people

      • MJJ says:

        President Trump said it best…. “It is not possible she could have known so little about Dirty Cop James Comey (and others) from her high position in the Department of ‘Justice,'” the president tweeted early Thursday. “The political Crime of the Century, and she had no idea what they were doing?”

        Absolute Impunity for Prosecutors that puts them above the Law in America requires New Criminal Reforms as well.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Jimmy R says:

      Isolate the damage to as few members of the coup e’etat as possible. Next, reduce the criminality of their deeds as much as possible. Goal: only a minimal number are punished and the punishment is retraining videos.

      Liked by 4 people

    • MJJ says:

      LAST CLIP:
      Senator Graham has Protected Yates and Rosenstein in his senate Hearings and allow them both to Skate on Signing False Information for FISA Warrants to Begin the Investigations now in Disrepute by USAG Barr Crew Correction Team. Maybe it was Planned to come out all along to Win in 2020 based on what DOJ-FBI -NSA did in 2016? All anyone knows now Joe Biden and Susan Rice could both be replaced before the Election, or Special Counsel be Appointed for an Investigation after the 2020 Election?
      28 June 2018 Jordan To Rosenstein: Why Are You Keeping Info From Congress:

      Liked by 4 people

      • Mr e-man says:

        Problem is there are other Republicans on that committee that could ask anything they wanted. Lindsay can’t control that.

        What did they ask, or not ask?

        Liked by 1 person

        • MJJ says:

          Yep, and some of the senators that were once Blinded by Russian Collusion are up for Re-Election now as well. Except The Honorable Senator Richard Mauze Burr of the Intelligence Committee that still sees Russian Conclusions Confusion that is retiring in 2022 with his Portfolio of Stocks & Bonds Sold they Minutes of that Day once learning about COVID-19 = “Communists Originated Virus Internationally Distributed in 2019?”

          By the way, what happen to that SEC-FBI Investigation?

          Liked by 1 person

      • cantcforest says:

        MJJ, after Comey’s stating that no reasonable prosecutor would take on Hildabeest, and Wolfe being hidden after some nominal plea bargain, I’m more than a little sensitive to your wording which suggests that LG has excused Yates and Rosenslime. I’m not ready to believe that Durham or Jensen? won’t wreck their little tea party. Just my 2 cents.

        Like

        • Amy2 says:

          So I gotta wonder why Graham is going on with this farce. He’ll get a few minutes of praise and then look like an idiot if Durham/Jensen come through.

          Like

        • MJJ says:

          I agree, it is up to USAG Barr, Durham, Jensen, & Bash to prove Crimes were Committed not just Incompetence Mistakes? FBI Clinesmith was Terminated and changed 302’s still lost in the FBI Sentinel System? Plus, USAG Barr said Prosecutors Misconduct happen but not Criminal in the Flynn Case and that has Confused Judge Sullivan as well???? Prosecutors Absolute Immunity is One Thing Above the Law in America Today and that needs Changed!

          Liked by 1 person

      • WhiteBoard says:

        Your last sentenCEEEE!!!

        Rosenstein was trying to say BECAUSE MUELLER IS IN CHARGE – keeping it from me. and he will make up a FAKE INDICTMENT of me carrying a wire if i dont stay out of the way

        Liked by 1 person

        • MJJ says:

          Rosenstein was suppose to being Briefed by Mueller Team but that did not happen either? Mueller only found Process Crimes using his “Absolute Immunity Prosecutions Above The Law Tactics” for “Absolution of any Criminal, Errors, and Omissions of any Brady Exculpatory Evidence, 302s Changes, Lost or Hidden, and not Investigating nor even knowing about GPS Fusion Config Delusion of Bruce Ohr Wife, and a Deputy to Acting USAG Sally Yates Confusion now be Changed and Transformed from 2017 Testimony to 2020 Hindsight Testimony on FBI Rogues Rules of Hillary Clinton Emails on her Watch?

          Like

          • WhiteBoard says:

            yes – rosenstein did what they said – cause he knew if they were capable of taking out the president, they were capable of taking him out

            and i watched the comey gowdy video you posted.

            Gowdy had comey admit to 10+ lies hillary did that are more consequential than the lies roger stone and papadopulos were charged with.

            Gowdy mentioned slackspace and calendar burnbags.

            Like

            • MJJ says:

              Well, noted it went back to the Clinton Days…..Contending his statement that “There’s nothing going on between us” had been truthful because he had no ongoing relationship with Lewinsky at the time he was questioned, Clinton said, “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing.

              No one expected the Clinton;s would keep making Mistakes like the Hillary Emails, and all wanted to be part of another Clinton Administration, but Trump Won!

              Only Mueller Process Crimes Roiling Rolling Process Crimes for Roger Stones but None for Rogue Breaking FBI Rules Investigations for Clever Comey that also Forgot to Seize DNC Computer Servers on Russian Collusion now destroyed by the DNC Computer Caretakers but Weissmann did not forget how to seize Manafort, Cohen and Stone Computers in the Middle of the Night and Dawning CNN media C overages with No Prosecutions of Illegal Leaks by Comey and Media Creeps, that had Prosecutors Absolute Immunity ABOVE THE LAW?

              Yet, Americans keep being told, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAWS but Prosecutors, Congressman, and section 230 Companies that now are the First Amendment Police of American Free Speech? To Paraphrase In Descriptive Grammar Shakespeare….”Something Is Rotten Not In Denmark But In A few Places Where American Law Must Remove Absolute Immunity That Abuse The American System of Government, Justice and Corporate Greed in Silicon Valley with COVID-19 Profits from Communists Originated Virus Internationally Distributed In 2019 Upon Americans, Business Owners, and President Trump a+Administration!

              Like

              • WhiteBoard says:

                Hell yea –

                what was the guys name that hammered hilarys devices? Justin Cooper? got to first letter minus name (the decision maker- acronym) pay attention to grammer again.

                Aaron Mortimer Zebley Was the deputy special counsel of the special counsel investigation headed by Robert Mueller. He was the former chief of staff to Mueller At the FBI

                Liked by 1 person

    • kimosaabe says:

      It’s not a court proceeding, dune. It’s an information gathering information release hearing. Surprised you don’t understand the difference.

      Like

      • Justin Green says:

        And that’s a huge difference. Many people watch these hearings and are upset that no law enforcement actions take place. Congress does not enforce the laws.

        Liked by 1 person

      • MJJ says:

        Well, explain that to Rosenstein and Yates that all of a sudden had a Lighting Strike of Saint Paul Revelation somewhere between 2016 and 2020 with a Renewed Reevaluation of their Blinding Signing Fisa Court Warrants Reticulations of False Information? All of a sudden in 2020 both have Testified they now have had a Rock of Ages Regret from once being Blind but now have had “Oh Can See You See Constitutional Criminal Violations Of Rights” asking for Department of Justice Recriminations Exoneration from any Incarcerations from Under The Oath Prior Testimony of Intentional Incompetence as seen in in PBS, CNN, and YouTube Clips that are Unalterable except Erasable by Section 230 Absolute Immunity Platforms?

        Just like Absolute Monarchs, Communists Party and Fascist Dictators that Americans Fought and Died for to End Absolute Power with Absolute Immunity that Corrupts Absolutely? Absolute Immunity from Prosecutions go Hand In Hand With Congressional Absolute Immunity from Defamation! One simple Question….Who Is Above The Law Again in America?

        Liked by 1 person

    • Donna in Oregon says:

      Yes. This!!!

      It’s almost like a dance. A dirty HO down. Until this debacle, Miz Lindsay has probably not danced with a woman in decades..

      Like

  2. CharterOakie says:

    Kudos to Liz MacDonald. She is VERY much on top of the details.

    Liked by 8 people

    • yy4u says:

      I have caught Liz McDonald a couple of times in interviews and need to record her program. She gets to the nitty gritty.

      I am always impressed with how INEFFECTIVE Republicans are in questioning witnesses.

      If the situation were reversed and the Democrats were questioning a Repub. DAG who lied on a FISA application, that DAG would be looking at jail time.

      I still say the GOP has passed its “use by” date and should, after Trump is out of office, go the way of the Whigs. The GOP should be working right now behind the scenes (Sundance? You’d be great to lead the mission) to start a new CONSTITUTIONAL Party that will do all the things the Republicans SAY they’ll do but have no intention of doing. Ask Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell who, when they had the House, Senate and Presidency…DIDN’T DO ANY OF THE THINGS THEY RAN ON.

      Liked by 4 people

      • yy4u says:

        Wish we had an edit button. The GOP BASE should be working now behind the scenes to start a new CONSTITUTIONAL Party…

        Liked by 1 person

        • TarsTarkas says:

          That would doom the Republic. The GOP Base needs to take over the GOP. DJT realized that early on that a third party insurgency can ‘throw’ an election the wrong way, which is why he ran as a Republican. If Perot doesn’t run in 1992, Bush Sr. would likely have won (yes, I know he’s Deep State nobility, but he would have been preferable to the Clintons). Wallace in 1968 allowed Nixon to win. Theodore Roosevelt splitting the Republican vote in 1912 gave us Woodrow Wilson and his theory of elitist governance.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Risa says:

            Yes, we do not need to start a third party. That would give elections over to the Democrat Communists in every election. We already have the Libertarian Party to drain off votes, we don’t need another.

            Better to work hard to kick RINOs out of the party, which is a daunting task because the state and national Republican organizations favor RINOs. The Uniparty depends on RINOs, whose interests align more with a Democrat’s than with Trumplicans. But we are still better in the short term with RINOs than Democrats, as illustrated by the recent impeachment fiasco.

            Liked by 3 people

          • Spooky says:

            You are delusional if you think the GOP can be reformed by it’s voting base. Trump has been president for 4 years now and the voters who put him there are still powerless. Elitist creeps and frauds like Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell are immune to our concerns and incapable of representing our interests. They are completely owned by powerful swamp interests like the U.S. Chamber of Crony Capitalism. They are globalist stooges who run the GOP for the benefit of their corporate and military masters. There is no way they can be dislodged by popular vote or sentiment and even if you could they would simply be replaced by like minded frauds and globalist hacks.

            You could set up a guillotine on the Capitol Mall and operate it 24/7/365 and still not drain the swamp. All you would have is a bloody mess and lots of headless corpses.

            Liked by 1 person

            • maggie0987 says:

              LIKE – (I am so fed up with WP these days, the lack of true ‘feedback’ from fellow Treepers is really annoying!!)

              Liked by 1 person

            • Azrajo says:

              You are so spot on. Once upon a time as a much younger Reagan ideologue I believed it could happen. It took me to the night at the 1980 Republican Convention To realize it would never happen. I remember calling my husband ,from convention hall , To tell him that they talked Reagan into selecting George Bush as his Vice Chair . The party was over before it began.

              Like

          • allin4freedom says:

            No, it would not doom the Republic, and I wrote to those clowns three years ago and told them one way to do it. Since the RINOs have wanted the conservatives out for decades, JUST GO. That’s the last thing they’d ever suspect. Using the Freedom Caucus as the nucleus, ally with the Libertarians and any surviving Democrats and Republicans who haven’t drunk the Kool-Aid to form a new party (I suggested naming it the Conservatarian Party). Had they done it when the Republicans had the majority, they would have instantly had a large enough controlling block: only the party that they decided to caucus with could create the majority to control the House and possibly even the Senate. They would have been in the catbird seat, either by forcing the RINOs back into traditional Republicanism, or threatening to caucus with the Democrats where they could have sat on their hands and done absolutely nothing, thereby spiking their cannons as well . With President Trump on board, it would have been game, set, match. There’s another chance in about 90 days. How about it?

            Liked by 1 person

      • Mr e-man says:

        Lindsay said he has no “proof” that Yates committed a crime so he treats her as if she didn’t. Innocent until proven guilty.

        The Dems do the opposite, they convict you and then grill you on committing the crime, even though they have no evidence. Guilty to never be proven innocent.

        And the media dutifully complies.

        And R’s wonder why the narrative is so one sided and completely wrong.

        Liked by 6 people

      • MJJ says:

        Still Lost but Not Found Original Flynn 302s that were Altered by Unaccountable Terminated FBI Employee in an Un-Erasable FBI Sentinel System that Proclaims that this kind of Data Harvesting is Incorruptible much like the Strzok-Page Text FBI Pnones that were Erased and lost by Mueller Investigators along with No Crime Scene of DNC Computers being Seized by the Above Holy Heavenly Media FBI Director James Brien Comey whose Daughter is Co-Lead Prosecutors on SDNY Epstein Investigations Prosecutions as well! No Refusals Nor Recusals just More Excuses of Unintentional Rogue Investigations that Lose Evidence and Witnesses Not Protect in a Jail Cell?

        When Clinton’s Names come under Investigations all of sudden Comey’s Names appear with Investigations and then the Media Games Blame Donald Trump Name comes under Investigations even when he was never in Government until 2017?

        Absence of Malice Subpoena’s on the Media also Never Exists or come to Fruition before a Weissmann Grand Jury according to Frustration Sidney Powell in a Two Tier Department of Justice Absolute Immunity Prosecutors? Americans Above The Law just for Prosecutors?

        Liked by 1 person

  3. MIKE says:

    I wish, someone could tell me, why 17 high-powered lawyers can spend $40 million on a bogus witch hunt, yet they could not afford to fly Mrs. Yates to the Capitol and give her a mask to wear.
    True, it isn’t the most pressing issue, but they isolated her for a reason, and it ain’t Covid-19.

    Liked by 8 people

    • MJJ says:

      What Really Caused The FBI In Position Of A Scandal Just Co,img Out Now, Double Justice Systems For Elected Public Servants And Process Crimes For Others Depending Upon Being Given A Pass By Prosecutors With Absolute Immunity Being Above The Law When they decide get any Investigation Wrong Intentionally Or Right Incompetently?
      FBI Chief Comey Grilled Over DNC Nominee Hillary Clinton Emails 7 June 2016 Link:

      Liked by 2 people

      • HeLLINaHandbasket says:

        @MJJ
        Why in the world are you capitalizing every word, in one great big run-on-sentence?
        I’ve stopped reading what you post, because your comments are impossible to read.

        Hey, I’m not telling you what to post, of course you’re capable of posting what you feel is important… but come on man, if you really want folks to read what you’re putting out there, you gotta make it readable!

        #MAGA

        Liked by 1 person

        • Fubu says:

          “Come on man?” Joe is that you? Just kidding. I agree

          Liked by 1 person

          • MJJ says:

            Fubu, No Bye-Don 2020, but I agree and can understand the Confusion many like you were taught the Traditional Way of Teaching Grammar in Schools under Deprived Prescriptive Grammar Arbitrary Rules. Grammar is seen as a set of Rules to follow. The Rules are passed from One Generation to another. Those who do not follow the Rules are looked down upon as being careless or Poorly Educated. In America, the style of Grammar used in Academic, Government, and Professional situations is called Standard American English FROM Bishop’s Lowth King Decree in England in 1762.

            There is No Official Government Agency in the United States that makes rules for the English Language. In fact, the United States does not even have an Official Language. Thus, it is the American Teachers that do not understand that either and usually rely on Tradition and Popular Style Guides to decide what proper grammar is. And they use Arbitrary and Capricious Rules themselves. As seen by the Poor Educational Quality coming out of American Schools today, by the way.

            Consequently, Descriptive Language existed before underprivileged grammar enthusiasts that cannot respond to content on Social Media boards? The Fact remains people still understood each other just fine, before Fake Grammatical Rules ever existed. Now during the Global Internet Text Age Blog Boards are Descriptive, no longer Prescriptive. Language as taught by Ignorant teachers that lack their own education in history.
            Cultural Language as used by Shakespeare merged now and like the Constitution of Rights is always evolving.

            I’m just ahead of the curve using Descriptive Grammar like Ben Franklin did refusing the King’s Ordain English. And the Proof is my Video Clip for those that cannot comprehend, nor recall, the Video testimony that now can be used against those that Testified Under Oath before Congress and Senate in 2016-2019. Or those that refused to Testify in Public Hearings and can be held in Contempt of Congress for 2 Years doing that too.

            Forget trying to Read using Prescriptive Grammar “HandiCAPS” to help you communicate more clearly. After all, my Clips must not have been so unclear since they came directly from Rosenstein, Yates, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, and Wray whose own Testimony was Confusing before Congress and senate back then but are changing their Tunes now that more Documents cam out?

            Liked by 1 person

            • HeLLINaHandbasket says:

              I notice you set your rules aside for your reply post, and went with the random capitalization instead of every single word – so, considering your reply was clarification defending your post (of every word capitalized), but your clarification reply doesn’t mimic that same regiment as the post you defended … geesh, I’m really not sure what your *rules* are now.

              … carry on, I’m out.

              #MAGA
              .

              Like

        • WhiteBoard says:

          He doesnt want to be associated with this information – because its an issue.

          so if you ignored his words – and rewatched the video – it might be useful through current eyes.

          Like

        • MJJ says:

          It is better to Recall what is “See Able Testimony Clips Available” of 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 when Posters Lack Abilities by worrying what they “Pretend is Unreadable” like you and “Fubull” as the only way for him to Object due his Disability Incapacity. So I Remind him he can see what he can’t read?

          The New Age Internet Grammar is back to “Descriptive Grammar” used by Shakespeare using blending of Words from the “Community, Other Nations, and Global Language Sources”, for Particular Emphasis.

          Ben Franklin used it too in this Example …..” “Printers are educated in the Belief, that when Men differ in Opinion, both Sides ought equally to have the Advantage of being heard by the Publick; and that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former is always an overmatch for the latter: Hence they chearfully serve all contending Writers that pay them well, without regarding on which side they are of the Question in Dispute.”
          Pennsylvania Gazette on 10 June 1731 – Ben Franklin

          FYI: The King of England ordered Bishop Robert Lowth’s book A Short Introduction to English Grammar, first published in 1762, using his random grammar rules were a way for the upper classes of London to protect themselves from a rising middle class. The English Elite Upper Classes of Slave Owners and Slave Ship Insurers became concerned that people below them were becoming more educated and access to sources of power held by King’s Favorites. So, to protect their own status and authority people started to prescribe their bias rules for grammar to keep “Obedient Citizens” from access to power and authority like the rich people of the day that get upset when they can’t respond and blame it on being unreadable???? Today, the Global Internet Language of Nations is Descriptive Grammar for everyone’s opinion, not Obsolete Prescriptive Grammar. Bishop Lowth hated Shakespeare by the way?

          Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      At least she doesn’t have a DOJ lawyer sitting by her and objecting to questions.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Guffman says:

      House arrest/ Ankle tracker??
      Just wishful thinking!!

      Like

    • MJJ says:

      Start Here…..
      Former Acting Solicitor General Neal Kumar Katyal that once was Appointed by President Bill Clinton commissioned him to write a report on the need for more legal pro bono work. In 1999 he drafted special counsel regulations, which have guided the Mueller investigation of the Russian government’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. He also represented Vice-President Al Gore’s as co-counsel in Bush v. Gore of 2000, and represented the Deans of most Major Private Law Schools in Grutter v. Bollinger, the University of Michigan affirmative-action case that the Supreme Court decided in 2003.

      Katyal forgot to put in Bipartisanship Selections Rules of Prosecutors so 17 Democratic Lawyers ended up on the Mueller Team of Russian Collusion?

      Sources:
      Remarks to Representatives of the Legal Community” (PDF). Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents. U.S. Government Publishing Office. 35 (29): 1430. 20 July 1999. Retrieved 27 June 2017.

      Neal K. Katyal. “Opinion | The Mueller Report Is Coming. Here’s What to Expect”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2019-02-21.

      Like

  4. cedars rebellion says:

    Eighty-eight days and ticking down.
    Still Investigating.
    Still preparing.
    Still smoke, no Durham indictments.
    Still Barr Blatherings on smug interviews on investigations…

    Liked by 1 person

    • Baby Hurley says:

      Well, at least someone with power to do something is outraged. /s

      Like

    • MJJ says:

      Why The Investigations Took So Long In Congress Hearing 7 December 2018 Link:
      Congressman Jordan Presses FBI Wray Over Strzok, Anti-Trump Dossier:

      Liked by 2 people

      • WhiteBoard says:

        Remember – Muelller is controlling what wray can see/touch/speak.

        see the insurance plan – from may 2017 – april 2019.

        Thats why we need to focus as the article states – ON THE PRIOR abuses.

        im sure the criminals in this russiascheme were also involved in the PRIOR abuses.

        Like

        • MJJ says:

          Katyal is now more Silent In Being Golden But Public Eyes Can Still See! All of sudden before the election? For example, once wrote…. “Why President Trump has left us with no choice but to remove him from office, as explained by celebrated Supreme Court lawyer and former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal. No one is above the law. This belief is as American as freedom of speech and turkey on Thanksgiving held sacred by Democrats and Republicans alike. But as celebrated Supreme Court lawyer and former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal argues in Impeach, if President Trump is not held accountable for repeatedly asking foreign powers to interfere in the 2020 presidential election, this could very well mark the end of our democracy.” https://www.nealkatyal.com/
          But forgot to explain why Prosecutors are Above the Law with Absolute Immunity?

          Liked by 1 person

          • WhiteBoard says:

            YES YOU CAUGHT HIM!

            he is the guy that coached Don Mcgahn to get POTUS to sign the EXECUTIVE ORDER that gave BOENTE God like status ( in 3 places at once)

            Liked by 1 person

    • Bud White says:

      I was told here that if nothing happens with Barr and his keystone cops by the 15th that SD is gonna unload a bunch of evidence and name names and stuff.
      So…

      Liked by 1 person

      • vikingmom says:

        That’s the rumor…although I don’t believe there was an exact date given – just “mid-August 2020” so we shall see. Would love to see the whole town of DC implode down upon itself but I am trying to not get my hopes too high, since they have been dashed so many times before!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Local Treeper says:

        I think Sundance is smart enough to know that August 17 is the date to go public. Being a Monday it lets the information lay bare in the public eye before everyone does their next mental reset the following weekend. He/ she would then hit the next big article on the 24th and so on.

        Liked by 1 person

      • MJJ says:

        The New York Times turned on Neal Katyal as well. Katyal endorsed President Trump’s nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court in an op-ed to The New York Times. When Public Editor of the NY Times criticized the op-ed for failing to disclose Katyal had active cases being considered by the Court, Katyal responded that it would have been obvious he always has cases being heard by the Supreme Court. Katyal formally introduced Judge Gorsuch at the Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings.

        After Neal spoke highly of President Trump’s nominations Gorsuch & Kavansugh to the Supreme Court. Calling him “mentoring and guidance” of Female Law Clerks as “a model for all of us in the legal profession.” “It’s very hard for anyone who has worked with him, appeared before him, to frankly say a bad word about him,” Then Katyal’s comments in support of Kavanaugh were made prior to Christine Blasey Ford’s Senate Judiciary Committee Testimony?

        Then Later…..Katyal did not go Rogue but did remain Silent on Kavanaugh after the Blasey Ford Foggy Memories? Katyal did join in the Congress Schiff Chorus Impeachment of President Trump in SCIF Rooms Stiffing, Staffing and Stuffing before Thanksgiving too.
        Looks like Schiff is still Above The Law With Absolute Defamation Immunity just like Section 230 California Platform Companies Too? Katyal forgot about that too with SILENCE IS GOLDEN but Katyal Eyes Can Only See Absolute Immunity For Liars on Trump Impeachment Phone Call Allegations?

        Like

  5. Right to reply says:

    Why did Rosemary Collier demand the mined NSA info be destroyed in 2017? She was demanding the destruction of EVIDENCE.

    Liked by 1 person

    • DiogenesVindicated says:

      Because once its destroyed the perps would not be able to use it. /s

      Liked by 1 person

    • jeans2nd says:

      The metadata was kept, the to/from and routing information.
      Only the contents of the email/phone conversation was deleted, obviously for privacy reasons.
      Adm Rogers was not that dumb, those calls/emails can still be traced.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

      Why did Rosemary Collier demand the mined NSA info be destroyed in 2017? She was demanding the destruction of EVIDENCE.

      The evidence was not actually destroyed.
      It still exists on the NSA database.
      The DOWNLOADED COPIES of the raw data are what were destroyed.

      The evidence is NOT the metadata.
      The evidence is the QUERY REQUESTS themselves

      It’s the NAME (or phone#, ip address) they were SEARCHING that is important.
      And that info is logged and should still be available.

      If those names are US Citizens then there better be a VALID SEARCH WARRANT to accompany it.

      Like

      • WhiteBoard says:

        the collyer report – documented the exporters were acessing behind the query system. they were directly within the source- so there was no way to track them.

        the exports had to of been found through other devices caught with them on it..

        Like

        • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

          16 and 17 queries are queries
          that’s how they were caught

          Please cite.

          Like

          • WhiteBoard says:

            START ———————-
            1) Unathorized user exported data – Page 69
            FBI aquired producted were exported [REDACTED} by users not authorized to access these products

            RIGHT HERE ——- > 2) Access to the system was Beyond/Behind the Query system – Page 20

            The NSA had not fully assessed the scope of problem: the IG and OCO reviews “did not include systems through which queries are conducted of upstream data but that do not interface with the NSA’s query audit sytem”.

            3) this UpStream Collection was MisLabeled in how acquired (masking the Comey Memo Method – Page 24

            Preliminary Notice (Mislabeling) (nearly ____ communications acquired through upstream Internet collection were “incorrectly labeled” as acquired from Internet service providers, and, as a result, likely subject to prohibited queries using US person identifers.”

            4) Comey gave access to users that the FISC was unaware of VIA an Interagency Memorandum (that was shut down immediately once found) (Footnote 60) – Page 87

            Like

            • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

              Thanks WB!
              Haven’t read that in awhile and totally missed that.
              “systems through which queries are conducted of upstream data but that do not interface with the NSA’s query audit sytem”
              Convenient backdoor.
              Funny…I’ve been going back over old materials and was yesterday re-watched the Senate Russia Investigation: National security officials testify to intelligence committee on FISA (Jun 2017)
              Rogers never mentions THIS 702 “feature” (vulnerability) nor a non-compliance issue.
              I’ve been getting the increasing sense over the past couple years that Rogers actions weren’t “heroic” but more a sense NSA may be left holding the bag.

              Like

  6. trapper says:

    Can’t watch all of it. Everyone keeps asking “why would Sally Yates lie?” For crying out loud. She lies for the same reason everyone who lies, lies. She doesn’t want to get in trouble. She wants to salvage her career and her law license.

    Only in the movies does Jimmy Cagny throw his hands in the air and declare “you GOT me, coppers. I did it.” In real life people lie about it. They deny they did it. They deny they even knew about it. They point the finger at someone else and say “he went rogue.” They say “some other dude did it.” They say “I dindunuthin.” They lie until you make it worth their while to NOT lie.

    That means they will keep lying right up until they have to admit their guilt in open court to support the plea deal you gave them that limits their penalty for what they did.

    Liked by 10 people

    • trapper says:

      Heard a line in a TV cop show the other day. A witness says : “I didn’t MEAN to lie. I just didn’t want to get in trouble.” Perfect

      Liked by 10 people

    • gymcy81 says:

      Yates,
      ” our department relies upon witnesses (and investigator$) telling us the truth ”
      (so when I review a FISA request…. to surveil a U.S. citizen…. I assume that when I read it… )

      uhhh….
      [ you can assume you are being duped by your colleagues….and should know it…you grew up in the mis-system…]
      …( and you were there because you were an “experienced”, high level, deputy AG that worked your way up in the (mis)system…? )

      [ and apparently the dept. does not deploy a timely check and balance system – other than the lag time of a 2 – 3 year process by the IG to find and report things – if, if he / she is made aware to look for something …
      …often way, WAY too late to timely prevent current legal harms from big government influences, occurring to others under investigations.
      repeat…
      page, pappadopolous, flynn, stone, manafort,…trump…
      untold others, for YEAR$… ]

      Liked by 4 people

    • Tom says:

      I wasn’t able to watch (due to work). I’m going to take a wild guess though: she was not put “under oath subject to the pains and penalties of perjury.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • botchedcasuality says:

      It appears that Lindsey just introduced and put her defense on record. I’m sure this interview will be shown in her defense.
      Ratcliff would have cornered her.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. SR says:

    These people are not getting indicted. These hearing results into nothing but talking points for 48 hrs. If lying under oath is a crime then whole DC would be in prison.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Koot Katmando says:

      Not even talking points. Almost nothing about it in the news. I looked at WSJ this morning expecting to see some thing. Did not see anything.

      Like

  8. MJJ says:

    PBS Sally Yates & Clapper Testifies Senate Subcommittee Investigating Russia Election:
    Pay Attention to Senator Grassley Questions at 1:13 Minute Mark & Senator Graham Remarks Questions? This was after Sally Yates was Fired and during Flynn Investigation by the FBI and Calling for Muller Special Counsel. Two Different Sally Yates Then and Yesterday? Don’t forget both Under Oath in Closed Congressional Hearings said they saw No Russian Collusion along with 37 other President Obama Appointees? Richard Allen Grenell Released Documents Provided that Change in Sally Yates Attitude on Flynn from 2017 to Yesterday in 2020?

    Liked by 2 people

    • WSB says:

      Even more important…1:12.

      Sally Yates testifies that the DOJ was working with the FBI “in the course” of the investigation.

      I guess Sally Yates was part of the “right people on the case.”

      Liked by 2 people

    • botchedcasuality says:

      If smthese Congress members heard in a closed hearing that no one believed Flynn lied that he was not involved in Russian intrigue. Why didn’t they step up? Why did they allow this innocent man to be stripped of everything?
      Cowardice and evil in their silence.
      RINOS Could have stopped this travesty.

      Liked by 3 people

    • botchedcasuality says:

      If smthese Congress members heard in a closed hearing that no one believed Flynn lied that he was not involved in Russian intrigue. Why didn’t they step up? Why did they allow this innocent man to be stripped of everything?
      Cowardice and evil in their silence.
      RINOS Could have stopped this travesty.

      Like

  9. Bubby says:

    Of course she did!

    Liked by 6 people

  10. MJJ says:

    “NSA Director Admiral Rogers Explains Unmasking 7 June 2017 Hearings”
    Note: Early View McCabe Sitting Next to Rosenstein Whispers As Soon As Admiral Rogers Answering The Question On Unmasking and Later We Know Illegal Leaks On Flynn Happen?

    Liked by 1 person

  11. MJJ says:

    Senator Angus King Presses Andrew McCabe Refuses To Answer Questions Intel Chiefs During The Same Hearings On 7 June 2017 Dodge Questions About Conversations They Had With President Trump.

    Like

  12. jus wundrin says:

    My confidence in the US senate to do the right thing against the coup plotters is nil. They can have all of the hearings they want, but in the end, and despite the obvious lying under oath, nothing will happen to them.

    The two tiered just-us system brought to you by ‘we the people’. Those that call themselves ‘conservative’ in SC who voted for grammy in the primary, are literally digging their own graves.

    Dear heavenly Father, please heal our land, and expose those who want to do evil in our country, and uplift, protect, and encourage those who want to do good!

    In Jesus name I pray, Amen

    Liked by 7 people

    • Justin Green says:

      True. Of course, it’s not Congress’ job to enforce the laws. That needs to be kept in everyone’s mind.

      What Congress CAN do is refuse to re-up the FISA court and the entire apparatus. Just eliminate it.
      They could make NSA database searches illegal. Repeal the Patriot Act in whole or in parts.
      They could increase the penalties for violating the civil rights of Americans.
      They could increase penalties for federal employees that knowingly file fraudulent charges, falsify testimony of witnesses, etc.

      Ultimately, this is up to Barr and his appointees, being in the appropriate branch of government to enforce the law.

      Like

  13. tominellay says:

    Liz has studied and learned Hannity’s method of interviewing…

    Like

    • Ockham's Phaser says:

      I’m sorry you think that way. The interruptions were not that bad and only accentuated by the time delay and her long introductions to her questions were NOT, unlike Hannity’s monologues, merely repetitions of talking points he’s repeated hundreds of times. She is inquisitive and on point.

      In fact, next time there is a Senate Judiciary hearing, I would rather see Liz McDonald in the captains chair asking the questions instead of Lindsey. Maybe we could have real interviewers asking the questions, real people instead of empty suits, asking pointed, probing questions with an interest in making these crooks squirm and getting to the bottom of things.

      Liked by 2 people

    • thedoc00 says:

      Wrong, all wrong. Liz is her own person and she never had anything to do with Hannity. She earned her stripes as a no BS side kick to Stewart Varney before (as was Maria B) he was roped in to being “fair and balanced” as part of his new contract. She was rewarded with her own show for her perfomance on Varney.

      If she did study another person it was Charles Payne.

      Liked by 4 people

    • steph_gray says:

      Cue the circular firing squad.

      Liz is excellent.

      Liked by 3 people

  14. gymcy81 says:

    After, 4 yrs, and listening to the q & a of the Senate and former deputy AG Yates it was even more apparent that;

    – there was (is) high paid, biased competence (incompetence) being deployed at the doj, fbi, state
    there is plenty of blame to go around, and plenty of finger pointing at others of being at fault – but, not themselves,
    – a complacent culture of not verifying each others fact gathering, work (or a nefarious bias to point to predetermined outcome )
    – secretive, rogue individuals performing duties – without consulting with colleagues – a lack of trust in each other to due their legal duty.
    – politicians more than willing to provide cover, or shade to the incompetence
    untrustworthy, illegal attempts and traps being set by ‘just-us’ to accuse those with a policy difference of opinion, of enacting something illegal.
    – there are thousands of employed people working in the same departments, but few have any idea of what is the common mission, or what is going on from person to person (other than some break room, or drinking fountain interactions….or passing each other in a hallway)
    – Having a meeting to discuss an agenda item (interference in election), but not being aware of a hidden agenda that is being played right in plain site (and not noticed until years, YEARS, after a IG sheds some light on it ) That point of larges$, beaurocratic deficiency, has had, and continues to have, HUGE impacts on past and current ongoing cases – adversely affecting untold lives across the U.S. – and apparently beyond the U.S.
    – Somehow, the involvement of the democrat party, or other countries, in the election interference got a blind eye, double standard treatment. (was not equally investigated).
    – Some of the entitled, elites, were willing to give Yates a pass, whom was well paid to perform the duties of the job title, yet no could say whomever else was to be in charge of effectuating an honest, unbiased legal process.
    – Apparently there is no timely, effective, check and balance system – nor a safe whistleblowing human resource outlet – to help improve the quality of workmanship. And that’s been going on, unchecked for how long…?
    – people pointed at the Mueller, and IG report, but skipped around whom was really running the doj / fbi for 2-3 years (figurehead Muellers special team…Weinstein etal…. )

    All of that, and more, is part of what some call a swamp, or the foggy bottoms – misaided and abetted by… (one could tell by Senate inquiry yesterday)

    A culture change, or a re-boot, or a re-start of the doj, fbi, State is needed – probably to clean up all of the divisive, double standards that were implemented with bo etc.
    [ that is hard to do fast and thorough given the legal job protections, but, when there are verified illegalities, the pathway to correct measures opens up… ]

    [ aiming or keeping that wrongful acts from ever happening again,
    would likely be further obfuscated with a biden / bo etc. mis-administration.
    So, those that want to protect their fed jobs, their culture, their double standards, their unadmitted bias, their inequality, likely know how they will selfishly vote…
    unless they truly become selfless in their every day, words and verified good deeds….
    (and undoubtedly, there may be some already present, there – that have been silenced, but should have an equal opportunity voice … )]

    So, if there is a genuine will for equal justice for all…
    then, there is a way…
    ( already, 4 Plus years way, way past due )
    …the corrective measure(s) would in effect, be loving thy neighbors and would clear a lot of consciences… a lawful, and good thing as part of we-the-peoples, longer term, pursuits of happiness.
    That opportunity is not a 1 person chore…it needs a group corrective effort, in concert with the laws…

    imho
    I do not know

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Mrs Lindsey said “we know Russia interfered in our election by hacking into Hillary’s emails” what? I thought Seth hacked in to Podestas emails exposing pediphile codes among other things

    Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      Lyndsey is throwing the DeepState media a line to keep their dead Russia, Russia, Russia story. If you hear anyone say “Russia” you can justifiably make solid conslusions about their mental judgment and TDS severity.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. islandpalmtrees says:

    Brookings institute, Hillary Clinton and the DNC funded the Steele Dossier.

    BUT, Soros funded Brookings institute and Hillary Clinton.

    So, who really funded the Dossier – Soros

    Liked by 6 people

    • Wethal says:

      IIRC, Paul SInger, a RINO billionaire, originally funded the Fusion GPS search for dirt on Trump during the primaries. When he didn’t want to continue after the primaries, the DNC picked it up. No doubt Glenn Simpson tipped them off that he had an oppo research operation going, and did they want to fund it.

      Liked by 2 people

  17. Richie says:

    No Audio/Sound for me again. This never happens on fake news you tube videos

    Like

  18. aja says:

    Rosenstein and Yates follow the Deep State tradition with Congress that it is easier to ask for forgiveness than it is for permission.

    Liked by 3 people

  19. Dimbulbz says:

    The reason why Joe Biden is running for President is because he was at the epicenter of the pushing of the Russian Hoax. You cant touch an Ex-president, or someone who is running for office. It would look too partisan. He and Obama were the pushers of the Russian narrative, and despite Joes obvious brain leakage, he and Obama can be found out, and no one can touch them. Everyone else can say “I was just following orders”. Its the perfect crime. Just wait, I bet Comey uses that – and he may get away with it, with Barr calling the shots.

    Like

    • Mr e-man says:

      “You cant touch an Ex-president, or someone who is running for office. It would look too partisan.”

      Yet they have no problem “touching” President Trump on every single issue.

      They only get away with it because the media covers for them.

      I read today that Trumps financial records were turned over by Douche Bank.

      Liked by 2 people

  20. islandpalmtrees says:

    I have added the following only because it talks to the funding.

    Soros, Obama and Dr. Fauci through grants funded the COVID-19 research in China, that produced COVID-19.

    The point is, Soros was once again involved in funding the destruction and corruption of the American government.

    Liked by 5 people

  21. Kitty-Kat says:

    She has a severe case of Hannityitus Interruptus.

    Like

  22. Sonia says:

    The prosecutor in charge, Connecticut U.S. Attorney Durham, has asked to interview ex-CIA Director John Brennan, “says a person familiar with the request”.

    News alert to the resistance that the top of the food chain has been reached?

    According to NBC Durham has not interviewed former directors Comey and McCabe, or former director of national intelligence James Clapper, according to two sources who are tracking the probe. A person close to Clapper said Clapper was informed by Durham’s office that he would not be interviewed as part of the investigation.

    Observation by Aaron Mate : “When CNN & MSNBC cover the criminal inquiry, they are literally covering their employees – John Brennan (MSNBC); James Clapper, Andrew McCabe, James Baker (CNN). I avoid the term, but it’s appropriate here: Deep State TV.”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sonia says:

      And also from Aaron Maté today – Fox News had taken up the battle for Seth Rich?

      Pretty strange. In court, Fox News is defending a May 2017 story that claimed Seth Rich had contact w/ Wikileaks & is asking Julian Assange to give a deposition. What I find puzzling is that Fox itself removed that story from their site, claiming it didn't meet their standards. https://t.co/pjP8h2gPne— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) August 6, 2020

      Liked by 1 person

      • I Hear You Now says:

        Sonia – it’s a bit more complex … I read an article on EpochTimes.com today that explains

        if you want to locate the article, one way is to use search feature at DuckDuckGo.com and put in this string:

        epoch times julian assange seth rich

        Like

    • beach lover says:

      I was ready to post this as well. I went back to listen to an interview with Joe DiGenova a couple weeks ago, and he said..Brennan will be the last person that Durham will be calling in. By that time, they will have testimony of others and probably plea deals already made.

      He also said, look for Brennan to take the Fifth.

      here’s the link for the audio..

      Like

      • bshaw7369610 says:

        Every time I see Joe D’s name come up in an article or post I just roll my eyes. Dude has been wrong on everything about the Russia Hoax. Especially in the IG report portion if my memory serves me. All these bombshells, indictments, and “6 days from today” type of hooks. And none of them ever came to fruition. Or if they did they were nothing burgers for lack of a better phrase.

        Its a shame too. Because he really gets you wound up when he talks. You feel his passion. I guess he’s really good at hype. He should be someone like Hannity’s hype guy. Kind of like female singers have a “Hype” girl on their dance team and whatnot.

        Like

  23. Dutchman says:

    I love the crutial role that Devin Nunes played, in exposing Spygate. It COST him, politically as he had a bogus ethics investigation opened against him, and was forced to step down as Chairman, somewhat stalling his efforts, …in addition there was a serious effort to defeat him in his next reelection.

    But, Liz McDonald at one point asks him TWO questions, and the second he ignores.
    “Are Republicans going soft on their questioning” (or something to that effect).

    Later, she does a little riff, “Republicans SAY they want to “get to the bottom of this” and yet,…”

    Unless the Republicon/Decepticon leadership in Congress, and their ESSENTIAL, ACTIVE role in the coup is EXPOSED for all to see, we simply can NOT “Drain the Swamp”; THEY, not Democrats alone, are the true dark, twisted, evil and blackened heart of the swamp.

    If the Republicons maintain control over the RNC and Congressional Republicon leadership in 2024, it doesn’t matter who is nominated in 2024.

    IMHO, THIS is the true battle for the soul of the party, and the future of America.

    Like

    • Hans says:

      So the major battle for the next session is Leader of the Senate … Mich has made them all rich.. it will not be easy… it’s the only way to clean the swamp.. remove them from the subcommittee ..

      Note Mich put Mitt Romney on several interesting committee …. Small Business … he raided them..

      Here is the link

      https://www.romney.senate.gov/committee-assignments

      Like

      • bshaw7369610 says:

        Americans MUST DEMAND that anyone that is elected to office at any level can not earn a single solitary penny through any means other than their political salary during their political life. And for 10 years AFTER they leave office. I don’t care if that means letting them keep their congressional salary throughout the ten years, IF, they leave office honorably.

        This would go a long way to cleaning up Washington. This way while in office they will not be able to set up any current OR post career dealings that will make their private businesses lucrative. I say 10 years because in all honesty, after 10 years it will be much more difficult for them to cash in on any side deals. In many cases if they tried to set something up political winds will have changed and deals will be broken. With the short memories of corrupt people, the “what have you done for me lately” mantra will govern the deals they may have set up for down the road.

        These politicians often times get into office and aren’t worth $100K. They leave office worth over $50 million. I mean, what more do we need to see to show that these people are bought and paid for??? Take that ability away from these people and it will go a looooong way in to getting corruption away from our political system.

        Like

      • Dutchman says:

        The key is “hearts and minds”; enough PDJT supporters need to bite the bullet, swallow the red pill, and SEE that the Republicons are OUR enemy, the enemy of America.

        Once they truly SEE that, and stop voting for them, once the Rinos are truly exposed for who and what they are, they lose any credibility, and with loss of credibility comes loss of power.

        Liked by 1 person

  24. akaPatience says:

    Stzrok’s notes from the infamous Jan. 5, 2017 Obama WH meeting contradict Yates. He wrote that Biden brought up the Logan Act, not Comey. The notes also mention that Comey said Flynn’s call with Kislyak was “legit”.

    Yates is lying to protect Biden.

    Liked by 2 people

    • deeperinfo says:

      Behind the Curtain:

      Don’t have link right now but have read that Brennan’s Legal Counsel brought up the Logan Act originally to Brennan. I’m guessing that Brennan used briefings to trasmit the Logan Virus to Biden and Comey for trasmission with no blame (like the kid in Portland arrested for throwing an explosive at the Federal Courthouse; handed to him by a stranger, and told “Throw this!”)

      Like

    • TarsTarkas says:

      That is if you trust the accuracy of Strozk’s notes. When did he write them? Why were they preserved? For all we know Yates might have been telling the trut. Besides, I’m not certain Biden would have known what the Logan Act was (he certainly doesn’t now).

      Like

  25. Hans says:

    So what is really missing in the weeds… the Panda..

    we keep hearing Russia Russia Russia. Meddling in the election .. when we should be hearing a Panda Panda Panda meddling in our country not to mention the election.. with the ownership of MSM ..

    This hearing IMHO was nothing but a distraction… no mention of Hunter Biden in the news lately
    .. and all the money he received to buy up distressed properties due to the Corona virus and the closed businesses on main st. All coordinated by Dem Governors and mayors.

    No revenue going to land lords.. no money to pay taxes or mortgages.. now who do you think is going to buy all those distressed properties…YOU GOT IT BAIN CAPITAL… and Mitt Romney and company on Wall St.

    No fase 4 by Congress yet .. surprised.. not really.

    Like

  26. Badger says:

    And we haven’t gotten to serious show-trial-theater yet about the attempted Papadopolous sting, with at least 2 other foreign intel services complicit in the charade. Wonderful stuff.
    “Just the ol’ Potomac Two-step, Jack…”

    Liked by 1 person

  27. John Rawls says:

    “Saudi Arabia, with Chinese help, has built a facility for extracting uranium yellowcake from uranium ore…”

    https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/saudi-arabia-reportedly-expands-nuclear-program-with-china-s-help-1.9049176

    Wonder what Gen. Flynn thinks about this? Flynn was trying to set up relations so that the US would be the ME go to ally on nuke tech. Many believe Obama/Mueller targeted Flynn for this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Siege Perilous says:

      Very good point, similar bunch of conniving happened here in the UK, 2014 ish time frame, the government sold it`s nuclear construction arm too…… you guessed it, China!
      Then to top it off, it goes and hires China to build the UK`s next generation of nuclear power plants, because it no longer had the capacity to build it`s own ones.
      Energy is the most corrupt legal business on the planet, because it is so important to the modern world, thus it is the literal hotbed of malfeasance, ineptitude, targeted weakening and just outright corruption, even more than the financial markets and that is saying something.

      Liked by 1 person

  28. Nessie509 says:

    The saddest part of this mess was the blatant plumbing of the NSA database to monetize the About Searches for the Elite UniParty and Corporate Donor Class.
    It’s a Big Club and You Ain’t In It. (George Carlin).

    Liked by 1 person

  29. puca58 says:

    Here’s my frustration with all these Kabucki theater hearings…Why does no one ever ask one of these seditionists what they think about Judge Collyer’s FISC opinion when they talk about FISA appl/warrants? (rhetorical; I know why!) It seems as if no one in the DOJ, FBI, NSA, or congress ever heard of it. Can it truly be that only Sundance & some of us here are they only ones who have?

    Like

    • cantcforest says:

      The only expectation I have of Congressional hearings is that they will be orchestrated to minimize damage to the Uniparty, and ignore/not pursue the important questions from Cruz, Nunes, Jordan and one or two others. You surely don’t expect the media to criticize softball questions to their darlings, do you?

      Liked by 1 person

  30. convert says:

    My question is: will Comey go quietly under the bus? Or has he been amassing all his own secret “insurance policy” material to take a bunch of people down with him?😂😂😂

    Liked by 1 person

    • Robert Smith says:

      Sometimes I say the term “true believers”, but they aren’t. They are sure actors, proven by their history of working for the DeepState. What actually are are calculating scum always wondering what’s in it for them. The less of the coup that is jailed the more the burden is going to fall on the chosen scapegoat. I don’t think Comey likes that deal.

      Comey’s Dear Diary notes to himself mare still out there.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hans says:

        I remember ‘for the greater good’… no way is this pompous a$$ going to take a hit.. he’s all about lying and manipulation.. he is self justified.

        I’ll bet he will a victim of his own procedure.. He will be investigated and he will sing like song bird. He has no friends in DC.. he has no options he has no choices.. cut a deal… IIRC Comey sent out a note to McCabe to stand tall. LOL…

        Like

    • kleen says:

      I think they write books to coordinate their testimonies so did McCabe and others.
      Comey wrote a book, they will all stick by the script.

      Liked by 1 person

  31. Jimmy R says:

    Comey can reduce his sentence (knock wood that he faces one) by giving the prosecutors Brennan. Brennan bamboozled Comey about the dossier in 2016. Just because Comey later caught wise and joined in the fraud doesn’t change that.

    Like

  32. Unsk says:

    Excuse me, but didn’t Nunes at least twice dodge Liz Mc Donald’s questions of why Obama and Biden shouldn’t be brought before the Senate Judiciary Committee. They are the big fish. Sally Yates is a small fry. Probably less than 5% of the American Public even know who she is. If she get fried for her lies and her fraudulent it likely won’t matter. At all.

    Liz was trying to get to the bottom of the January 5th meeting. Obama called the meeting. Why? What did he say. What did Biden say. It seems pretty clear that from Strzok’s notes that Biden brought up the the Logan Act. Why not really to get to the bottom of this Logan Act issue which cannot happen unless Biden is brought before the committee.

    Damn the media hoopla. Do their jobs. This was a serious undermining of the next administration by a sitting President that likely continued while Trump was in office. That has to be brought before the the American people. If they were serious they would call both Biden and Obama before the committee, put them under oath and then grill them about all this. The Fraudulent FISA warrant, the unmasking of thousands for political purposes and the January 5th meeting to undermine the next President.

    Like

    • Bryan Alexander says:

      Nunes is a house member, so that is not his role to speak about to begin with.

      He knows Graham, a Senator, is carrying the water for the Swamp. He knows that, First, it won’t happen, and Second, it would be a waste of time because the Graham is in the tank for the swamp and wouldn’t do anything.

      Liked by 1 person

  33. Bluto says:

    With everybody dog-piling on it being all Comey, I’m expecting to hear Comey start crying that it was all Brennan.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. kleen says:

    So much of what know, we knew back in 2017 during the Muller hoax.

    Just think about that, if not for Pravda, Muller scam would have collapsed before it even started.

    The ONLY reason it went on and on and had ANY credibility was because of Marxist Pravda. They control the information that most people see here and abroad.

    It needs to end. Something needs to done. Free speech, freedom of the press is one thing. But when they are taking orders to disinform the unsuspecting public to help a political party and sell that as news that is not free press or freedom of speech, that’s manipulation, fraud, disinformation to control the population. It should be illegal since is being sold as facts, news but all involved know is a lie.

    The truth was out years ago. Pravda is still manipulating the truth for political gain.

    There’s should be mandatory disclosure between opinion shows and true news then a way to hold them accountable for lies and disinformations. Law suits.

    If you claim it’s a fact, you better have a way to back it up.

    Opinion should be free and have no limit. But when they sell news it should be fact based and corrected as soon as they find a wrong information.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. kleen says:

    Like

  36. trumpthepress says:

    Yates is so full of it. They all had meetings about it. She is up there with Comey being a complete liar.

    The CYA junk is nauseating. Lindsey was terrible in 90% of his softball questioning.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. deeperinfo says:

    View at Medium.com

    I don’t find much mention of this key group meeting.

    Its all about getting proof from plea bargains to nail the Coordinating Conspirators. Plea Bargain Bingo and Pin the Indictments on the Donkeys.

    Trying to find an article that mentioned the actual origination of the Logan Act Accusation was Brennen, as thought up by his legal counsel. I suspect that Brennen infected the Logan Virus into Biden and Comey via Briefings… let others throw the bomb.

    Like

  38. johnnyfandango says:

    Also a nice summary following yesterday’s testimony by Roscoe Davis. Yates is such a liar. Just because Ms. Lindsey is giving her a pass doesn’t make it correct or accurate. She’s on the top 10 of my hit list.

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1291331458871721987.html

    Liked by 1 person

  39. kleen says:

    Up on Roscoe Davis Twitter:

    There are some Republicans as well. Just to his Twitter feed. I bet they are RINOs.
    Most are Dems

    @realDonaldTrump
    has struck a bigger blow for child trafficking and cracking down on these sick bastards, and pedophiles come room both political parties. But The Swamp is full of sick bastards.

    Grand Jury Indicts Ed Buck on Drug Trafficking Offenses, including Giving Methamphetamine to 2 Victims Who Suffered Fatal Overdoses

    Democratic radio host, Bernie Ward, plead guilty to one count of sending child pornography over the Internet Democratic deputy attorney general from California, Raymond Liddy, was arrested for possession of child pornography.

    Democratic State Department official, James Cafferty, pleaded guilty to one count of transportation of child pornography.

    Democratic State Department official, Daniel Rosen, under Hillary Clinton’s state department, was arrested and charged with allegedly soliciting sex from a minor over the internet.

    Democratic Maine Assistant Attorney General, James Cameron, was sentenced to just over 15 years in federal prison for seven counts of child porn possession, receipt and transmission.

    Democratic State Department official, Carl Carey, under Hillary Clinton’s state department, was arrested on ten counts of child porn possession.

    Democratic activist, donor, and spokesperson for Subway, Jared Fogle, was convicted of distribution and receipt of child pornography and traveling to engage in illicit sexual conduct with a minor.

    Democratic Illinois Congressman, Gus Savage was investigated by the Democrat-controlled House Committee on Ethics for attempting to rape an underage female Peace Corps volunteer in Zaire The Committee concluded that while the events did occur his apology was sufficient and took no further action.

    Democratic State Representative candidate for Colorado, Andrew Myers, was convicted for possession of child pornography and enticing children.

    Democratic State Senator from Alaska, George Jacko, was found guilty of sexual harassment of an underage legislative page.

    Democratic activist, donor, and director, Roman Polanski, fled the country after pleading guilty to statutory rape of a 13-year-old girl. Democrats and Hollywood actors still defend him to this day, including, Whoopi Goldberg, Martin Scorcese, Woody Allen, David Lynch, Wim Wenders, Pedro Almodovar, Tilda Swinton and Monica Bellucci.

    Democratic New York Congressman, Fred Richmond, was arrested in Washington D.C. for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old boy.

    Democratic Illinois Congressman, Mel Reynolds resigned from Congress after he was convicted of statutory rape of a 16-year-old campaign volunteer.

    Democratic Governor of Oregon, Neil Goldschmidt, after being caught by a newspaper, publicly admitted to having a past sexual relationship with a 13-year-old girl after the statute of limitations on the rape charges had expired.

    Democratic activist and actor, Russell Simmons, was sued based on an allegation of sexual assault where he coerced an underage model for sex.

    Democratic activist and aid to NYC Mayor De Blasio, Jacob Schwartz was arrested on possession of 3,000+ child pornographic images.

    Democratic Seattle Mayor Ed Murray resigned after multiple accusations of child sexual abuse were levied against him including by family members.

    Democratic Mayor of Racine, Wisconsin, Gary Becker, was convicted of attempted child seduction, child pornography, and other child sex crimes.

    Democratic activist and #metoo proponent, Asia Argento, settled a lawsuit for sexual harassment stemming from sexual activities with an underage actor.

    Democratic donor, activist, and Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein is being criminally prosecuted and civilly sued for years of sexual abuse (that was well known “secret” in Hollywood) including underage sexual activities with aspiring female actresses.

    Democratic New York Congressman, Anthony Weiner, plead guilty to transferring obscene material to a minor as part of a plea agreement for sexted and sending Twitter DMs to underage girls as young as 15.
    Democratic donor and billionaire, Jeffrey Epstein, ran an underage child sex brothel and was convicted of soliciting underage girls for prostitution.

    Democratic New Jersey State Assemblyman, Neil Cohen, was convicted of possession and distribution of child pornography.

    Democratic Alaskan State Representative, Dean Westlake, resigned from his seat after the media published a report alleging he fathered a child with a 16-year-old girl when he was 28.

    Democratic aide to Senator Barbara Boxer, Jeff Rosato, plead guilty to charges of trading in child pornography.

    Democratic California Congressman, Tony Cárdenas, is being sued in LA County for allegedly sexually abused a 16-year-old girl.

    Democratic official from Terre Haute, Indiana, David Roberts was sentenced to federal prison for producing and possessing child pornography including placing hidden cameras in the bedrooms and bathrooms at a home he shared with two minor female victims.

    Democratic activist, Andrew Douglas Reed, pleaded guilty to a multiple counts of 2nd-degree sexual exploitation of a minor for producing child pornography.

    Democratic Party Chairman for Davidson County, Tennessee, Rodney Mullin, resigned amid child pornography allegations

    Democratic activist and fundraiser, Terrence Bean, was arrested on charges of sodomy and sex abuse in a case involving a 15-year-old boy and when the alleged victim declined to testify, and the judge dismissed the case.

    Democratic party leader for Victoria County, Texas, Stephen Jabbour, plead guilty to possession and receiving over half a million child pornographic images.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Millbrook, New York, Donald Briggs, was arrested and charged with inappropriate sexual contact with a person younger than 17.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Stockton, California, Anthony Silva, was charged with providing alcohol to young adults during a game of strip poker that included a 16-year-old boy at a camp for underprivileged children run by the mayor.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Dawson, Georgia, Christopher Wright, was indicted on the charges of aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, rape, child molestation and statutory rape of an 11-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Randolph, Nebraska, Dwayne L. Schutt, was arrested and charged with four counts of felony third-degree sexual assault of a child and one count of intentional child abuse.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Winston, Oregon, Kenneth Barrett, was arrested for setting up a meeting to have sex with a 14-year-old girl who turned out to be a police officer.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Hubbard, Ohio, Richard Keenan, was given a life sentence in jail for raping a 4-year-old girl.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Clayton, New York, Dale Kenyon, was indicted for sexual acts against a teenager.

    Democratic Former Mayor of Stillwater, New York, Rick Nelson was plead guilty to five counts of possession of child pornography of children less than 16 years of age.

    Democratic Massachusetts Congressman, Gerry Studds, was censured by the House of Representatives after he admitted to an inappropriate relationship with a 17-year-old page.

    Democratic Virginia Delegate, Joe Morrissey, was indicted on charges connected to his relationship with a 17-year-old girl and was charged with supervisory indecent liberties with a minor, electronic solicitation of a minor, possession of child pornography and distribution of child pornography.

    Democratic Texas attorney and activist, Mark Benavides, was charged with having sex with a minor, inducing a child under 18 to have sex and compelling prostitution of at least nine legal clients and possession of child pornography.
    He was found guilty on six counts of sex trafficking.

    Democratic Texas attorney and activist, Mark Benavides, was charged with having sex with a minor, inducing a child under 18 to have sex and compelling prostitution of at least nine legal clients and possession of child pornography.

    Democratic activist and BLM organizer, Charles Wade, was arrested and charged with human trafficking and underage prostitution.

    Democratic Radnor Township Board of Commissioners member, Philip Ahr, resigned from his position after being charged with possession of child pornography and abusing children between 2 and 6 years-old.

    Democratic spokesperson for the Arkansas Democratic Party, Harold Moody, Jr, was charged with distribution and possession of child pornography.

    Democratic Illinois State Representative, Keith Farnham, has resigned and was charged with possession of child pornography and has been accused of bragging at an online site about sexually molesting a 6-year-old girl.

    Giselle Maxwells list finally became unsealed and here’s what’s happened before that while all we are strategically distracted by one political scandal after another and this covid mess. Not all shown are connected to Epstein over the years but it’s comprehensive list.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Sgt Stryker says:

    ….and there is NO evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC computers.
    Who killed Seth Rich?
    Why has no one questioned Assange?
    They’re still blowing smoke up our asses.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. regitiger says:

    SNAPSHOT Brief:

    (this summary is a short “snapshot” of how the corruptors, namely Yates, is attempting to frame/narrate/excuse the frameup of LTGEN Flynn.)

    I am providing this snapshop brief for two reasons:

    1. for those not having the patience to wade through and be frustrated with a ridiculously poor audio and video replay of 3 plus hour goat rodeo.)

    2. to select and laser in the crucial elements of misinformation/redirection strategies now being developed by the corruptors….

    snaphot:

    a. Yates insists this was not political spying
    b. Yates insists this was not spying that involved targeting LTGEN Flynn directly.
    c. Yates insists that the 4 January recommendation to drop the “criminal investigation” into LTGEN had no bearing on the further investigations that would become a counter-intel investigation.
    d. Yates elaborates accountability and responsibility on the matter of how false and manufactured fisa applications involving FISA warrants (e.i, Carter Page), but also open handedly serves up the FBI as the investigators who bear the brunt of the responsibility for this fraud. Yates admits she would not have approved this FISA application, had she KNOWN these errors and ommissions were present. (we understand the pass the buck strategy.)
    e. Yates insists there were two separate and unique mutually exclusive elements of “investigations”…both of which just happened to be run and operated by NSD Lawyers and the same cabal of FBI agents…

    there are:

    investigations into the potential the trump campaign and its associates that might have involved “collusion” with russians, or potential blackmail compromise to the same foreign power.

    counter-intelligence operation to determine and learn why Russia/Putin DID NOT respond according to the calculation of the obama sanctions had just made openly.

    Yates cannot seem to realize that trying to make some legal distinction between these two “investigations” is incredibly obtuse ….

    the reality is that Flynn WAS targeted…because HE was in fact talking to Kissie. They knew this…and they knew this without having to spy on him. LTGEN Flynn DID IN FACT MAKE NOTES AND RECORDS of this phone call. Thouroughly…He shared them voluntarily as a course of normal duty to the DIA, his former agency…which had already been established to work with him then and also later as part of his official duties within the Trump administration as the NSAdvisor.!

    FBI targeted Flynn on two modes of investigation because THIS IS ONE ASPECT OF THE ENTIRE INSURANCE POLICY…can’t get him on a crime….ok, then get him on some quibble on the c/intel investigation.

    f. Yates makes it clear she has zero love for comey….this is probably true…but let NOT that personal feud cloud the discussion and strategy…Yates did not perform her job in protecting the rights of a decorated combat military officer of exemplary record.

    Yates rubber stamped the FISA warrant KNOWING that Carter Page was a CIA plant installed for the direct purpose of deploying a large scale multi-hop spy operation that had its sole purpose to perform a coup against this president!

    these are the facts…some opinions…fully supported by more than just a short morning of analysis.

    stay tuned.

    note: true justice will not come from these judiciary committees….please understand that. this committee has ZERO power to prosecute anyone with a federal crime! They can expose and provide some sunshine on the matter, that is all. Do not place any false hopes that justice will come from any of these committees hearings…Either the DOJ/Durham will go after these crimes, or not. Or WE THE PEOPLE will serve justice….

    Liked by 1 person

  42. Loralie C says:

    Not impressed with Nunes shifting the narrative ever so carefully to Trump and Pence shouldn’t have fired Flynn. It’s unfortunate he was let go, and my hope is Flynn will be vindicated and if we are lucky he will again serve this nation. The idea that Trump could have done anything else while weathering the Russian Tsunami is ludicrous.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. Matt says:

    Cruz asked Yates ‘was any other 2016 candidate spied on . That could be the key if there was …it would blow everything wide open

    Liked by 1 person

  44. susanphd says:

    the reporter said Hillary Clinton was looking for a way to discredit or nullify the 2016 election. (So she could take over?) Thus she launched the crossfire hurricane scam. OMG I never heard that conclusion. Shocking!

    Liked by 1 person

  45. Siege Perilous says:

    In essence it is this, as Sun Tzu said a long time ago.

    ” Do not do battle at the time and place of your opponents choosing, give battle at the time when your enemy least suspects it and at the location they are least prepared “.

    I would venture Sundance is saying this exact thing.

    The enemy is prepared to rebuff any and all accusations, courtesy of Rice`s memo, so do not give battle at that point.

    The location to get out the trenches and storm the enemy is the predication, not the how they did all the corrupt processes rather why they did anything at all…..

    That trail leads firmly to the CIA/FBI inserted spies ( possibly elsewhere too ), who are the sole sources, to my knowledge, for any mention of Russia, which was on the record ( literally audio exists that the spies attained ), rebuffed and disavowed by anyone in the Trump camp.

    It is these setups that are the predicate and all of them, again to my knowledge, are from government implanted spies, stretching all the back to the ratfucker himself in 2014 trying to besmirch Flynn.

    Add in the fictitious hack of the DNC and the downstream events in that and that maybe a very good place to do battle in my opinion.

    Like

  46. horseyb says:

    @Johnheretohelp (worked with RR in Baltimore and is trying to help get the truth out) re-tweeted this interesting nugget. This was new to me. Why would all those players meet that day???

    Like

  47. horseyb says:

    And here’s another doozy. I can’t keep up! But it’s looking like Ukraine is finally breaking open too?

    Like

  48. Donna in Oregon says:

    This Senate hearing is a SHAM, a FAKE procedure. Bread for circuses.

    The statute of limitations is the time limit for filing charges against the defendant. The general federal statute of limitations for felonies stands for the proposition that the government can no longer file criminal charges for an offense once 5 years has passed. The federal statute of limitations is 18 USC 3282

    The Senate cannot charge any of these people….neither can the DOJ.

    What is the Statute of Limitations for Conspiracy?
    Section 371 conspiracies are subject to the general five-year statute of limitations for non-capital federal offenses set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3282. This five-year statute of limitations also applies to conspiracies under other federal statutes unless those statutes contain their own limitations periods. The statute of limitations for conspiracies that require an over act begins to run on the date of the last overt act. Concealing a conspiracy whose objective has been attained is not a conspiracy in and of itself and does not prolong the length of the conspiracy for purposes of the statute of limitations. For conspiracies under statutes that do not require an overt act, the conspiracy must continue into the limitations period. Because a conspiracy ends when its main criminal purpose has been achieved, whether the conspiracy has continued into the limitations period depends on the scope of the agreement and whether its purpose has been achieved or abandoned.

    What are Some Defenses to a Charge of Conspiracy?
    If you are being investigated for or have been charged with a criminal conspiracy, our firm’s experienced criminal defense attorneys can determine if you have any potential legal defenses. Defenses might include:

    Mere presence/mere association. In some cases, a defendant may be able to show that while he associated with members of a conspiracy, had knowledge of the planned crime, or even acquiesced in it, he did not agree to join a conspiracy.
    Withdrawal. In other cases, a defendant may be able to establish the affirmative defense of withdrawal by establishing that he effectively withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act was committed. Defenses based on withdrawal after an overt act has been committed are really statute of limitations defenses since the statute of limitations begins to run upon the conspirator’s withdrawal from the conspiracy.
    Lack of knowledge. A defendant may be able to show that he had no knowledge that there was a conspiracy, even if he acted in a way that furthered the conspiracy.

    https://www.finchmccranie.com/federal-conspiracy-cases.html
    .

    Liked by 1 person

    • regitiger says:

      Hi Donna,

      I am not confident you are correct here.

      conspiracy IS a continuing offense on federal statute. It is a very special exception to the “normal” five year clock.

      https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual-652-statute-limitations-conspiracy

      let this sink in

      “An individual’s “withdrawal” from a conspiracy starts the statute of limitations running as to that individual. “Withdrawal” from a conspiracy for this purpose means that the conspirator must take affirmative action by making a clean breast to the authorities or communicating his or her disassociation to the other conspirators. See United States v. Gonzalez, 797 F.2d 915 (10th Cir. 1986)”

      two things:

      1. This IS NOT to be viewed as my support for any further delays by main justice to slow walk the indictments and arrests….immediately is the correct answer …swift and decisive justice for a crime of this magnitude is of course, in order…

      2. there are a vast number of other felony crimes too numerous and dynamic (*at this time) to elaborate that are also NOT limited by the five year clock. I cannot imagine main justice NOT charging many of these individuals with other crimes above or below conspiracy. We shall see. In the course of investigations, it would almost certainly be expected other criminal activity pops up..it always does with the corrupt crowd…believing for years of firewalls, there are invincible and invisible. We shall see on that.

      regards,
      regitiger

      Liked by 1 person

  49. PVCDroid says:

    This is so infuriating. Graham just exonerated Yates and she didn’t blink an eye while lying her ass off obviously knowing no one is going to touch her.

    Like

    • Lurker360 says:

      Ms. Graham ain’t the fat lady. And she surely ain’t God. Ms Lindsay is trying to “earn her keep” for fundraising purposes while attempting to inoculate her DS associates. It does not by any stretch end here.

      Like

    • regitiger says:

      three things:

      1. no one fears congress. no one!

      lying isn’t punished by congress….check the history…let that be your guide.

      2. congress can “refer” charges to DOJ….they rarely do.

      check the history…let that be your guide.

      3. congress produces reports and massive tax payer fraud…not necessarily in the order.

      there is ZERO benefit to congress or this committee to expose ANYONE that threatens the secret police spy powers THAT CONGRESS manufactured quite a long time ago for some unmeasurable exigent foreign terror threat. That it has become THE MOST PRIZED money making machine like no other in the entire history of mankind was not coindidence. It was predicted by many. That we only “learned of it” recently should not really be something to celebrate. This apparatus and those that used it secretively to steal power, enrich themselves, and destroy their enemies was always going to be the end game. It’s been going on for quite a bit of time. Snowden and others exposed it, and yet, few if any paid serious energy in rolling these powers back…

      so that’s the game…how to remove this apparatus completely as a means to spy on US citizens.

      you are NEVER going to hear that discussion in congress…nope.

      WE THE PEOPLE will need to force this ….by our inherent powers enumerated in the constitution…and identified in our sense of self protection….and guts.

      Liked by 2 people

  50. botchedcasuality says:

    Remember when Sally Yates DOJ was asked to provide the InspectorGeneral(‘OIG’) Documents and access for review.
    She required 58 pages to say: (FU, no one is going to review our work!) Of the 58 page memo you need only read the first paragraph acknowledging the request and the conclusion in the final paragraph below.
    ‘For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that Title III, Rule 6(e), and section 626 permit the Department to disclose certain statutorily protected information to OIG in certain circumstances. We further conclude that to the extent those statutes prohibit disclosure of such information, neither the IG Act nor section 218 permits the Department to disclose it. ‘
    https://themarketswork.com/2018/05/28/bypassing-the-inspector-general-sally-yates-and-the-dojs-national-security-letter-carve-out/

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s