Agencies In The Media….

Long term CTH readers will not find this surprising, but it’s nice to see it starting to be said/admitted openly:


State Dept. and Defense Dept. embeds primarily operate through CNN.  CIA embeds primarily operate through The Washington Post. FBI embeds primarily work through The New York Times; and Politico carries a blend.  Fox is the controlled opposition.

Researchers who travel the deep weeds of U.S. politics have noted this very predictable pattern has been very visible for well over two decades.

This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, FBI, media bias, Notorious Liars, NSA, President Trump, propaganda, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

284 Responses to Agencies In The Media….

  1. Either by choice, OR NOT….

    Enter Scarborough..

    You decide.

    Liked by 13 people

  2. Harlan says:

    “Fox is the controlled opposition.”

    That must mean they’re RACIST, or something equally disturbing.

    Liked by 5 people

    • rondonmonson says:

      No, CONTROLLED means the Deep Staters allow them a few Conservative pearls or leaks here and there, but for the most part, they seek to CONTROL THEM, like Ryan going to work there, they have since Suspended Dobbs, both Judges, fired O’Reilly before he got there, tried to get Hannity at the same time, the O’Reilly hit was orchestrated, they hit him while he was on vacation, before he could get back and create a defense.

      They just got Trish fired, and Kennedy seems to have lost her show. These are INTIMIDATION TACTICS.

      Liked by 16 people

    • Controlled opposition: Appear to be in opposition but always stop short of doing successful opposition. You will not see anything on the Federal Reserve, that politicians don’t write laws but lobbyists, etc. etc.

      When someone steps out of line, e.g. Trish Reagan identifying that the whole plandemic was used to remove Trump (destroy economy, mail ballots, etc.) she was fired.

      Liked by 12 people

      • Big Jake says:

        Trish Regan went full gun control. She lost viewers by the truckload. Glad she’s gone.



      • Dutchman says:

        For a clear example of “Controlled Opppsition” or PHONEY, FAKE “Opposition” look at Congressional Republicon Leadership; McConnell, Graham and the rest in leadership positions.

        Faux and the Republicon party leadership are both posing as ‘the Conservative alternative’, but NEITHER really ARE.

        But, they occupy the SPACE of a Conservtive Alternative, and block the formation of a REAL one, and guard their space zeolously.

        Its no accident that OAN is hard to access, whereas CNN and Fox are everywhere.

        Iits no accident that Perots party, and the tea party were undermined.

        Same thing.

        Liked by 5 people

        • BitterC says:

          It’s really come to the point where the sides are no longer conservatives vs lefties.

          Globalists vs Nationalists seems more apros pos

          Liked by 4 people

          • Dutchman says:

            Been saying that for awhile.
            When Mitt said he was “a TRUE Conservative” during 2012 election, I threw up. As I rinsed my mouth, I thought “THATS IT! I will no longer refer to myself, even in internal dialogue, as a “Conservative”,….
            But until PDJT came along, I didn’t have a term to replace it.

            I STILL consider myself to BE Conservative, just not A Conservative.

            An Economic Nationalist, Nationalist/Populist, Deplorable, MAGA/KAG, Anti-Globalist, Anti-Conmunist,…

            But I am NOT a “Conservative”, while I loved the movement of William F. Buckley, Barry Goldwater and Ronald Reagan, it was infiltrated subverted and corrupted cause thats what Conmunists do.

            When Romney, Graham, McStain, Bill Krystal-Nickt and George Will call themselves “Conservatives”, I can no longer consider my tent THAT big!

            Liked by 4 people

        • Ackman419 says:

          Rooster is a good example, too.

          Liked by 2 people

        • Exactly, spot on!


    • Chieftain says:

      You can so far and only so far.
      Seth Rich?
      Hannitus Interuptus?

      Liked by 1 person

  3. arsumbris says:

    Any guesses as to who the “embeds” are at Fox?

    Liked by 2 people

  4. MelH says:

    We knew it because Sundance told us, but seeing it in print on Twitter provides hope the unwoke might see it. Twitter recently thwarts using them as a help for Trump winning 2020 since there is no mixing of parties; The left see only Leftist posts and the Right see only Conservative posts. ONE of their censoring modes.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. RobInPA says:

    Surprise surprise surprise!


    Liked by 3 people

  6. TradeBait says:

    Zero doubt of this. Been proven too many times. The MSM is part of the DS and the DS is the enemy of the people. Mockingbirds + one fake predator.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. old sneakers says:

    Excellent article Sundance

    Liked by 7 people

  8. tageweb says:

    I LOVE the video!!!! WOW1111

    Liked by 10 people

  9. Serpentor says:

    Controlled opposition – a perfect description for them.

    Liked by 6 people

  10. MelH says:

    WordPress also censors. My Post “looked” like it would be posted but is not, a trend that seems to have started recently. Is there a daily limit on number of posts, per article, or per person? Or does the number of posts affect how much the site owner has to pay WordPress per day or week or month?

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Murray in Nashville says:

    My most fervent hope is that what ever charges Durham, Barr, et all bring; that they include “conspiracy” so that anyone or any group who furthered that conspiracy, knowingly or unknowingly is also charged. Obviously that could include the media AND THEIR OWNERS.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. hocuspocus13 says:


    Liked by 4 people

  13. Deplorable_Infidel says:

    “Fox is the controlled opposition.”

    IMO the key word is “controlled”.

    Just enough to keep us squabbling amongst ourselves while the (D) & (R) uniparty laughs all the way to their domestic & off shore banking accounts.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Raptors2020 says:

      Judge Napolitano blurted out the truth, that foreign intelligence agencies (5 eyes) were involved in setting up the Russian Collusion hoax. He was inexplicably suspended from Fox for this, and when he returned he was, effectively, a different person. His story might be more impactful, if revealed, than General Flynn’s.

      The salaries of these TV talking heads are absurdly large; that would be incentive enough, for most people, to obey orders and toe the line.

      Megyn Kelly’s attempt to “get” Trump during a debate on Fox certainly looked like “controlled opposition” at work. Her subsequent multi-million $ flop sojourn at NBC smelled like a payoff to many.

      Liked by 14 people

      • Your Tour Guide says:

        Noticed over the last year that the most
        strident of the MSM newsreaders and Hollyweird
        types are all absurdly wealthy.

        Sorry if I harp on this too much, but look up
        any of the most vocal’s net worths. Then, compare
        it to their talents/ marketability.

        Lately have started to wonder if the $$$$ are the
        carrot to continue the narrative. And if there is a
        $$$ stash for the chosen ones from either the deep
        state, or, say China.

        When you see how these persons live compared to
        most, it’s very reminiscent of upper level communist
        party members vs the proletariat back in the day.


      • donna kovacevic says:

        Megyn Kelly’s interview with president Putin a few years back was a big time flop. I believe she realized it as soon as she saw Putin’s look, it was like hey bimbo do you even know what you are talking about. I loved when he told her even her 5 year old daughter would know better, it was regarding the hoof marks as he called them, the prints saying Russia spied. I was embarrassed for her.

        Liked by 1 person

  14. gettimothy says:

    National Review, The Weekly Standard, WSJ, On radio, the mustachiod one…

    Liked by 2 people

  15. Bogeyfree says:

    And in case you want more proof that the game was always about spying first, gathering information second and using it for Leverage was the final play, here is it.

    This from the mouth of a government registered whistleblower who actually did the spying and then gave the FIB 47 hard drives worth of evidence back in 2015.

    “I produced 600 million pages. If you printed out each page it would be thirty miles high stacked one on top of another. The information is very sensitive information. They collected google searches, credit cards, phone records, images, pictures, anything and everything, and they did it for one reason: LEVERAGE. They didn’t know when, but they knew sooner or later they would need that information to use for those leverage against a person … The amount of information is mind-boggling, and I gave all of that to FBI Director Comey’s office.”

    AG Barr knows this so why is he ignoring this??


    Afraid what you will see? Afraid of the truth? Afraid to admit US Agencies have been spying on Americans for years. The difference is this was a concerted effort to gather and blackmail Americans and you say what???

    Where are those drives Mr. Barr?

    Don’t tell me lost by the FIB maybe???

    Liked by 5 people

    • TrumpPatriot says:

      I do not understand why Montgomery didn’t keep copies. Wouldn’t he realize he himself might need leverage? Why would he trust those he knew not to be trustworthy.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ketchikan says:

      Judicial Watch helped the whistleblower, Montgomery, turn the discs over to Comey. (Before anyone knew Comey was in the tank). My understanding is that Montgomery has copies and he has a suit against the govt..

      Judicial Watch initially sent a letter out to all of their followers touting the turning over of the discs, but not a peep since then.

      You can listen to a discussion of what Mongomery uncovered at:
      Per The American Report Whistleblower’s Tapes: Trump Wiretapped a “Zillion Times” by the HAMMER; Brennans’s and Clapper’s Secret Computer System.

      Remember they have info on EVERYBODY (judges, politicians, you and me) which gives them leverage over whoever they choose.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. islandpalmtrees says:

    Well, at-least we now understand why HIV drugs needed to be developed.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. alliwantissometruth says:

    Control the government, the media, the school system and the corporate influence

    Be it under the guise of politics, ideology or public safety

    Call it communism, progressive politics, fairness or the public good

    It all boils down to the same thing

    Power and money through corruption and criminality

    Money buys power. Power buys control

    The end result is always the same

    The power to control the people, their resources and their wealth, which is then transferred into the pockets of the elites

    Liked by 5 people

  18. merlintobie says:

    Here’s a blast from the past on the subject: CNN – “The CIA’s News Network?”

    Liked by 5 people

  19. Magabear says:

    Fox has Chrissy Wallace, Paul Ryano, Chris Stierewalt and I’m sure many others behind the scenes writers who script the narrative in the way the deep state actors prefer. Just look at the Fox news crawler for evidence of that.

    But at least Fox has a good primetime lineup, the rest of fake news has zilch.

    Liked by 4 people

  20. bessie2003 says:

    Having read here for a few years now, I created a handy post-it note cheat sheet of these networks and their ‘sources’ for material and/or spin.

    Am curious, any designations yet for Newsmax? I found out they are carried on our cable network (no OANN yet) because of Sean Spicer’s new show and find it much better than listening to Hannity’s never-ending haranguing monologue and haven’t watched their other shows long enough to figure out their angle.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Please remember those who never made it home because they are why you can enjoy the Decoration Day weekend.

    Liked by 9 people

  22. “Controlled opposition”, pretty much defines Sean Hannity. But what happen to Bill O’Reilly, wasn’t he controlled.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Joe20 says:

      Fox is all controlled opposition.

      Fox sells news to conservatives.

      Fox needs to appear conservative, so you trust them.

      Then they send “trusted Fox reporter” Meghan Kelly to kneecap Trump at the debate.

      And the conservatives who watch and trust Fox think, “My trusted news source tells me Trump is bad. I’ll be a Never Trumper now.”

      Liked by 1 person

  23. T2020 says:

    Thank you, SD!! Love that video compilation almost as the one from Election night Nov 2016!! And the meltdowns continue.👍🏻🇺🇸

    Liked by 1 person

    • Conservatarian says:

      IMHO…Fox has it’s own controlled oppo running at the bottom of the screen (crawler) which is unbelievably obvious at night. I also believe Fox is 100% globalism (WSJ/COC) but allows some controlled oppo of this on Fox Business with Lou Dobbs. Fox’s model is far more nuanced and subversive. Hook the true Conservative viewers with personalities (Dobbs, Carlson, Hannity, Ingraham) but run Uniparty during the day. The fake news is much harder to detect than on the whack job networks like CNN and MSNBC.

      Liked by 2 people

  24. “The agencies have someone at every major news outlet.” Only one?

    That can’t be right.

    “This Agit-Prop ain’t gonna write itself!”


  25. Publius2016 says:

    Since WWII our intelligence budget knows no bounds…after hundreds of billions dissappeared after 911, we’ve seen an explosion in research and development in new media…much of the money has come from Deep State…look at every major network and you will see public private partnerships through marriage and families…look at major networks and you will see the BIG FOUR…independent media is dependent on the BIG THREE social networks…

    A new technology is needed that allows maximum freedom of association and commerce…somebody will invent it!

    Liked by 3 people

    • OlderAndWiser says:

      On the new technology – it can be done. The question is the financing. You need billions to get it out there and get maximum adoption. Creating the technology itself? Probably 15-20M that competes effectively with the social networks.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Dutchman says:

        So, does ANYONE here think that DJT, after 2024, is going to rest?
        Trump Media, with an entertainment division, that like Disney USED to be, produces wholesome entertainment,,and a News Division, that puts ALL the others out of business.

        He has said “After I leave office, you will ALL go out of business!”
        Yeah, cause he’ll put them their!
        Probably buy them up, at fire sale prices, lol.

        Make up for the $ he is losing, during this 8 year stint as POTUS, and he’s entitled!

        Liked by 1 person

  26. Thunderstruck by a Failed Coup D’SWAMP called Crossfire Hurricane!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  27. Bryan Alexander says:

    “He graduated with a BA degree in 1983 and worked for about a year at the Business International Corporation, where he was a financial researcher ….” – Wikipedia on Barak Obama

    A 1977 New York Times article mentioned Business International as one of the lesser known of 22 news organizations found to have employed journalists who were also working for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

    Liked by 3 people

  28. Trent Telenko says:

    This casual admission sounds like the laying of the ground work for major exposures of Deep State agents in the MSM.

    “Everyone knew it, it was no big deal”



  29. Bogeyfree says:

    If I could get just one report from Grenell it would be……..

    Tell me how many Federal Judges were surveilled via the NSA Contractor Program or unmasked from 2009-2016.

    Then compare that total with the 8 years of Young Bush, Clinton or Reagan just for comparison sake.

    And I’d like especially to see if and how many times, if any, Judge Scalia, Judge Roberts And Judge Sullivan were surveilled or unmasked during this same time period.

    Just curious Mr. Grenell

    Liked by 6 people

  30. 4mercy says:

    Maybe Cavuto is FBI – that’s his problem!

    Liked by 1 person


    John Adams in a speech to the military in 1798 warned his fellow countrymen stating,

    “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion . . . Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

    John Adams

    Liked by 6 people

  32. patti says:

    CNN are The Mask Police now…..
    Can’t have POTUS out enjoying an afternoon of golf without being harassed can we?


  33. Merkin Muffley says:

    Has a name or two ever slipped out? Can you give us any speculation? Why do I want to say Dana Perino???

    Liked by 2 people

  34. patti says:

    Liked by 1 person

  35. Kirsty I says:

    I hate to be a sop but no matter what Bill Barr says, his actions speak much more loudly.
    E.g. When he said that they wouldn’t be laying charges against the two headed Serpent, Biden/Bama,
    the next day the audio of Biden and Poroshenko was released.
    Also the audio of Kerry and Poroshenko.
    The DOJ then told Michigan to stand down and joined in a law suit against their tyranny and also filed an amicus brief for the defendant in Flynn’s trial.
    Appear weak when you are strong.
    Trust the plan.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Exactly. Ignore the noise/words/strongly worded letters and look exclusively at actions/results or lack thereof.

      There is clear evidence of criminal actions of Brennan, Comey, McCabe, etc., yet ZERO indictments.

      We shouldn’t buy the BS that we need to wait for full investigation. We can indict TODAY and add charges as more crimes come to light. There is absolutely no reason to wait. The Dems didn’t have any evidence and still indicted everyone near Trump.

      It is time to take the gloves off.

      Liked by 5 people

      • dwpender says:

        Absolutely right! There is no reason Durham needs “to get to the bottom of ‘it’ ” (a phrase we hear from Barr and Congressmen all the time) to START indictments.

        Liked by 2 people

  36. woohoowee says:

    Co-conspirators. Is Durham going to get to the bottom of it, or will it be FISC?


  37. rcogburn says:

    They’ve had this in place since the 1950s: Operation Mockingbird.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Fox is part of the system. They did and do NOT want Trump. That’s why they have the BS polls.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. guybee55 says:

    It’s almost like it is a plan. Oops – how dumb of me. It is a plan.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Why do you think they tried to discredit conspiracy theories for decades?

      It gets so that people won’t look when the real conspiracy is going on and facts are staring us in the face.

      One of the things that woke me up is information from the book below. One of the documents was that generals went to JFK and wanted to shoot down an American plane and blame it on Cuba. This is NOT theory. This is fact. Yet, you don’t hear about it anywhere, including on Fox.

      That’s why you still hear the BS line from Hannity that 99% of FBI are good, when the truth is closer to maybe 10%. The FBI, CIA, FDA, etc. should be dismantled.

      63 Documents the Government Doesn’t Want You to Read by Jesse Ventura via @amazon


  40. woohoowee says:

    DOJ-FBI to FISC: It’s printed right here in this paper / newsclip, Your Honor, so ya know it’s gotta be true! (And we’ll both pretend I didn’t put it there to match what I’m saying is the reason for this warrant sans due process, wink-wink-nudge-nudge.)

    Justice American Style? No Judge could figure it out?


  41. Sherri Young says:

    The CIA has been involved in media since before there was a CIA. Here is a little something straight from their website.

    PBS did a documentary three decades ago or so about the movement of talented German artists and technicians into Hollywood, the work they did, and how they were able to help other Germans escape the Nazis and work in media, mostly film.


  42. VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

    I was caught,
    In the middle of a climate hoax… THUNBERG

    I looked around,
    And I knew that they’d stab us in the back… THUNBERG

    My mind braced,
    And I thought, what can we do… THUNBERG

    And I knew,
    There was no help, no help from news… THUNBERG

    Three little words
    Spewing from its mouth
    The words “How Dare You”
    Tore us apart

    You’ve been – THUNBERGSTRUCK

    Liked by 1 person

  43. sarasotosfan says:

    What a great clip!

    I’d like to see Grenade Grenell pull the pin on all the government connected people being paid with tax dollars that have infested media.

    They need to leave their lettered employer.


  44. Reserved55 says:

    Ol’ Frank Figliuzzi infamous FIB agent


  45. freepetta says:

    This action of leaking selective classified info to the ragsheet newspapers and liberal fake news sites is illegal!!
    When are the “journalists” going to be held accountable for these breeches!
    I loved the video it is very cool. Just sayin 💁🏻‍♀️

    Liked by 1 person

    • Dutchman says:

      Illegal to LEAK, ….NOT illegal to print.
      1A, dontcha know.
      However, the assumption of the Founders was that so long as ANYONE was ‘free’ (of GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP) to print anything and everything, or SAY anything, that the “Marketplace of ideas” would reject the foolish notions, just as it rejects foolish products of ANY kind.
      The FCC licenses “free” aka ‘commercial’ TV, because,WE the PEOPLE own the airwaves. However, WE don’t own cable or satelite, and the FCC control is either leftist or nonexistent.

      Its a dilemma HOW to ‘fix’ the media,…
      Constitutionally, and the marketplace of ideas doesn’t seem to be reigning in Big Media, or Big Tech.

      Anti-trust laws,….perhaps?

      Liked by 2 people

      • freepetta says:

        There is an easy solution. Fire and prosecute the feds that are leaking this defamatory and confidential info.
        Prosecute a “journalist” for disclosing highly sensitive national security info.
        All these people are cowards. They will fold like cheap suits.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Dutchman says:

          No, they couldn’t prosecute the Ny times, for printing the Pentagon papers, and we wouldn’t want them to.

          If they weren’t using Weismann fantasy law, they shouldn’t be able to punish assange, either.
          Now, Dickless Manning, or these other dickless leakers?
          Hell yeah!
          But, its not an ‘easy’ solution, without the WILL to prosecute.

          Both McCabe and Comey admitted leaking, and neither charged, at all.

          The SSIC guy got 2 months, after threatening to call Senators on SSCI, and put under oath and ask “Did you order him to leak?”

          We need WILL at,DOJ, to prosecute, and instead we got Bill.

          Liked by 1 person

          • freepetta says:

            The leakers should be brought to justice.
            Fake News journalists think they are immune to prosecution.
            That’s why we have this LEAKY situation.
            If you don’t make examples of some, this 💩 will never stop.
            Let Durham finish his investigation then you can moan and groan.
            These 💩 journalists are to blame as well and it’s time it’s stopped!


            • Dutchman says:

              Well, I don’t think Durham is going to hold anyone accountable.
              The problem with media is a much bigger problem than the journalists.
              Its them, plus their bosses, and those who own the multinational media conglomerates, that are ultimately beholden to China CCP, as there actions are making crystal clear.

              Liked by 2 people

              • freepetta says:

                Mr. Dutchman I could almost guarantee there will be indictments. I believe Durham has the goods.


                • Dutchman says:

                  Oh, I BELIEVE Durham HAS the goods, he even went to Europe, to recover misfuds blackberrys.

                  But, he didn’t turn the sim cards over to Sidney,….and Prosecutors don’t write reports;
                  The write indictments,…or declination memos.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • freepetta says:

                  In a real investigation you don’t disclose your evidence unlike the scamming RATS 🐀.


          • freepetta says:

            May I add it was “journalists” who bribed the Feds with sports tickets, vacations, theater tickets etc etc etc.
            So then that is ok with you?🤦🏻‍♀️


            • Dutchman says:

              No, I never said it was. I’m saying they could not legally prosecute Hanoi Jane, for treason, or ‘giving aid and comfort to the enemy’ although she obviously DID give aid and comfort to the N Viet Cong, and our boys who were fighting and dieing in that hellhole certainly considered N.Viet Cong the enemy.

              They could not prosecute the NYT for publishing the Pentagon papers, but they COULD, by todays laws, prosecute Danial Ellesberg, for LEAKING the Pentagon papers TO the NYT’s.

              The point of freedom of the press, is that once you start down the road of the Federal government restricting what the press can print, you end up with Rosen and Atkinson.

              They were writing stories the Fed. Government (Obama, Clapper, Brennan, Comey) did not WANT printed,…IIRC the,Rosen case WAS cause he published leaked material, so they tapped his phones, to try and find the leak, and prosecuted him either to cover up that they had tapped him, or to pressure him to reveal his sources.

              As for Atkinson, it may have started out going into her computer, but then it LOOKS like they deliberately PUT Classified info on her computer,..presumably to “frame” her, in order to get her to reveal her sources.

              You can’t say its o.k. to prosecute these leftist urinalists, because it also means its o.k. to prosecute Journalists who were TRYING to print the truth, about the Obama admin.

              We don’t ‘suffer’ from not enough Censorship; we suffer from too much.

              From political correctness and ‘hate crimes’ legislation, to media bias, to internet censorship, we have WAY to many restrictions on freedom of speech.
              The assault on 2 A is obvious, but the assault on 1A is more perniscious.
              Look how I-net is suppressing any questioning of the lockdown. THATS censorship, and you want,….MORE?

              Liked by 2 people

              • freepetta says:

                What I’m saying is there are other crimes involved by the Feds being bought for inside info and the fake news giving “gifts” for those leaks.
                This is a much bigger deal Dutch and yes even Fake News can be prosecuted for offering goods for info.
                Good discussion. 💁🏻‍♀️


  46. carthoris says:

    Our Founding Fathers would have considered King George III to be a minor threat to liberty compared to the FBI and CIA.

    Liked by 2 people

  47. TwoLaine says:

    I did not realize Adam had left Fox. When I was still watching FNC I did realize I had not seen him in awhile, but I mostly tho’t he was international or California specific.

    That is a shame. They keep running off the good ones and keeping pieces of sh1t like Lyin’ Liar Donna Brazile, and that Barf character, who run off all their audience.

    Does anyone remember when The Kenyan ha a plan to put someone in every news outlet? Yes, he got his way after all.

    And if you don’t do what he wants, he will invade your privacy BIGLY. Just ask Sharyl Attkisson and James Rosen.

    Liked by 1 person

    • IAWulf says:

      I follow Adam on twitter. He explained why he left Fox-he was interested in hard news reporting all across the globe. In his opinion, they had moved to primarily opinion, not hard news. He also was one of the original reporter’s breaking the news on the unmasking three years ago and wanted to pursue that in depth. He still has sources who know the score- he was a week ahead of all news organizations in reporting that the W uhan virus was from the virology lab and had been “messed with” according to three indpendent sources he knows. Also, he owns a winery and they are really good. Century Oak Winery for any one who has an interest.

      Liked by 2 people

      • TwoLaine says:

        Yes, I actually just read all that before I started my post earlier. I am happy for him and his family, but hope we will still get some of his ground-breaking stories. In fact, I just sent him one I hope he will take on.

        Liked by 1 person

  48. VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:

    I was caught,
    In the middle of a climate hoax… THUNBERG

    I looked around,
    And I knew that they’d stab us in the back… THUNBERG

    My mind braced,
    And I thought, what can we do… THUNBERG

    And I knew,
    There was no help, no help from news… THUNBERG

    Three little words
    Spewing from its mouth
    The words “How Dare You”
    Tore us apart

    You’ve been – THUNBERGSTRUCK

    Flew in the skyway
    Broke the limit, she hit the town
    Went to the U.N.
    Yeah U.N. and she had some fun

    She scowled the Donald, the Donald
    Who took her good time
    He broke all the Rules, showed us these fools
    Yeah, yeah, Hoax, Hoax, Hoaxing our minds.

    She was shaking at the knees
    Could she go away please
    Yeah, the people were too kind
    You’ve been – THUNBERGSTRUCK
    Yeah-yeah-yeah, THUNBERGSTRUCK


  49. theoldgoat says:

    At least Goebbels was more honest with calling it what it was, propaganda, a means to shape the news to fit the agenda.

    Pravda in the US has sunk to covering just about, if not all, the “news” agencies. This is exactly why we know it for what it is, Fake News.

    Liked by 1 person

  50. Hans says:

    What most people are missing…. journalist/gov operatives plant articles in the newspaper… the the CIA/FBI etc. quote those articles to open investigation/get a judicial Warrant… the government operatives set the predicate for spying…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s