U.S. and U.K. Intelligence Agencies Worry About John Durham – Scrutiny of CIA Draws Media Apoplexy…

There was once a time, not that long ago, when the mainstream left was highly critical of the CIA, and scrutiny of dubious claims by U.S. intelligence was a common occurrence. Of course all of that changed when those same intelligence agencies were weaponized to target a political enemy that was also the enemy of the left, namely Donald Trump.

Now, in the era of modern political narratives, no intelligence claim against the Trump administration is too outlandish. Regardless of dubious sourcing, it’s all pushed as fact so long as the target of the claim is President Donald Trump.

As a result it is not a surprise how targeted weaponization became the cornerstone of the Russian narrative, and sketchy intelligence claims of Russian involvement in elections became the mortar that binds the bricks.  The end product is tenuous at best; and if anyone starts to scrutinize the instability of the construct they too become a target.

Last year U.S. Attorney John Durham and U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr were reported to be spending time on a narrowed focus looking carefully at CIA activity in the 2016 presidential election.  That CIA activity is directly related to the construction of the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report (JAR), and January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA).  Both constructs are so critical to the Russia narrative that anyone who dare question the information becomes an immediate risk and target.

Using information from U.K. media, and looking closer at yesterday’s New York Times report about investigations of the CIA, in this outline we will explain where corrupt U.S. and U.K. interests merge; what specific action was taken, & why the mortar is crumbling.

2019 – “One British official with knowledge of Barr’s wish list presented to London commented that “it is like nothing we have come across before, they are basically asking, in quite robust terms, for help in doing a hatchet job on their own intelligence services””. (Link)

The U.K. Independent ran the above quote last year based on British intelligence officials who were concerned about scrutiny on their aligned activity with the U.S. CIA during the 2016 election.  More recently, yesterday the New York Times ran an article breathless with concern about DOJ inquiry and Attorney John Durham questioning the CIA directly.

2020 […]  The Justice Department has declined to talk about Mr. Durham’s work in meaningful detail, but he has been said to be interested in how the intelligence community came up with its analytical judgments — including its assessment that Russia was not merely sowing discord, but specifically sought to help Mr. Trump defeat Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

[…] The analysts could have been engaged in standard bureaucratic behavior like obeying the filtering process or hoarding sensitive information. Or perhaps they were trying to cover something up. The questions asked by Mr. Durham and his team suggest they are looking for any potential basis to support making the latter reading, officials said.

[…] Mr. Durham has interviewed F.B.I. officials and agents who worked on the bureau’s Russia investigation, called Crossfire Hurricane, and for the special counsel who took over the inquiry, Robert S. Mueller III. They have also interviewed C.I.A. analysts.

Mr. Durham and his team also interviewed around a half-dozen current and former officials and analysts at the National Security Agency, including its former director, the retired Adm. Michael S. Rogers, last summer and again last fall. The Intercept first reported the interviews of Admiral Rogers.

But Mr. Durham has not interviewed the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, his onetime deputy Andrew G. McCabe or Mr. Brennan. Mr. Durham has requested Mr. Brennan’s emails, call logs and other documents from the C.I.A. to learn what he told other officials, including Mr. Comey, about his and the C.I.A.’s views of a notorious dossier of assertions about Russia and Trump associates.  (NYT Link)

It is important to remember how critical the Russian interference narrative is to the activity that took place in 2016.  If you take away the mortar, the building collapses. If the concrete evidence is not there to support the intelligence claims of 2016/2017, then all justification for the downstream “investigations” is lost.

Without the Russia narrative, those who weaponized intelligence for political surveillance are naked to the world.  The Russia narrative is essential for their justification of everything.  In a world with a functioning media the high importance of a key detail would mean even more scrutiny on that detail was warranted. Alas, in the world of orange-man-bad, the concept of a functioning media is as visible as a rotary phone.

The two-year investigation that generated the Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central element to the Russia interference narrative in the 2016 U.S. election.  This claim is perhaps the sketchiest.

It is also important to remember just how extensive the operations of the CIA were in 2016; because it is within the network of foreign and domestic operations where FBI Agent Peter Strzok is noted as a bridge between the CIA and FBI operations.

By now people are familiar with the construct of CIA operations involving Joseph Mifsud, the Maltese professor now generally admitted/identified as some kind of a western intelligence operative who was tasked to run an operation against Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos in both Italy (Rome) and London. {Go Deep}

In a similar fashion the CIA tasked U.S. intelligence asset Stefan Halper to target another Trump campaign official, Carter Page. Under the auspices of being a Cambridge Professor Stefan Halper also targeted General Michael Flynn. Additionally, using assistance from a female FBI agent under the false name Azra Turk, Mr. Halper also targeted Papadopoulos.

The initial operations to target Flynn, Papadopoulos and Page were all based overseas. This seemingly makes CIA exploitation of assets and targets much easier. However, there is an aspect to the domestic operation also bearing fingerprints of the CIA; only this time due to the restrictive laws on targets inside the U.S. the CIA aspect is less prominent. This is where FBI Agent Peter Strzok working for both agencies starts to become important.

In their text messages Strzok has a working relationship with what he called their “sister agency”, the CIA. Additionally, CIA Director Brennan has admitted Strzok helped write the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which outlines the Russia narrative.

Also late July “Electronic Communication” from the CIA to the FBI originating FBI operation “Crossfire Hurricane” was party authored from the CIA by Strzok.  The fast moving Strzok immediately used that EC, to initiate Crossfire Hurricane as authorized by his boss FBI Director of Counterintelligence Bill Priestap.  Then Strzok traveled to London to debrief intelligence officials there about the Australian Ambassador to the U.K, Alexander Downer and his contacts with George Papadopoulos.

Peter Strzok appears as a very eager, profoundly overzealous James Bond wannabe, who enjoyed a role acting as a bridge between the CIA and the FBI. The perfect type of FBI career agent for CIA Director John Brennan to utilize. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]

Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson hired CIA Open Source analyst Nellie Ohr toward the end of 2015; at appropriately the same time as “FBI Contractors” were identified exploiting the NSA database and extracting information on a specific set of U.S. persons.

It was also Fusion-GPS founder Glenn Simpson who was domestically tasked with a Russian lobbyist named Natalia Veselnitskya. A little reported Russian Deputy Attorney General named Saak Albertovich Karapetyan was working double-agents for the CIA and Kremlin. Karapetyan was directing the foreign operations of Natalia Veselnitskaya, and Glenn Simpson was organizing her inside the U.S.

Glenn Simpson managed Veselnitskaya through the 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Donald Trump Jr. However, once the Fusion-GPS operation using Veselnitskaya started to unravel with public reporting… back in Russia Deputy AG Karapetyan unfortunately died in a helicopter crash.

Simultaneously timed in late 2015 through mid 2016, there was a domestic FBI operation using a young Russian named Maria Butina tasked to run up against republican presidential candidates. According to Patrick Byrne, Butina’s handler, it was FBI agent Peter Strzok who was giving Byrne the instructions on where to send her. {Go Deep}

Additionally, Christopher Steele was a British intelligence officer, hired by Fusion-GPS to assemble and launder fraudulent intelligence information within his dossier. And we cannot forget Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch who was recruited by Asst. FBI Director Andrew McCabe to participate in running an operation against the Trump campaign and create the impression of Russian involvement. Deripaska refused to participate.

All of this context outlines the extent to which the CIA and FBI were openly involved in constructing a political operation that settled upon anyone in candidate Donald Trump’s orbit.  Much of this overlapping operation was seemingly directed by Peter Strzok operating with a foot in both agencies. [Strzok gets CIA service coin]

Thus we see the importance of the Russian Conspiracy-Interference Narrative.  Without that baseline all of the aforementioned operations have no justification.  Again, this Russia narrative is the critical mortar that binds the investigative and political surveillance bricks.

All of this engagement was admittedly controlled by U.S. intelligence; and all of this was intended to give a specific Russia impression. This predicate is presumably what John Durham is currently reviewing.

The key background point is to see how committed the CIA/FBI were to the narrative of Russia interfering with the 2016 election. The CIA, FBI, and by extension the DOJ, put a hell of a lot of work into it. Intelligence community work that Durham is now unraveling.

John Durham is looking at the construct of the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); and talking to CIA analysts who participated in the construct of the January 2017 report that bolstered the false appearance of Russian interference in the 2016 election. This is important because it ties in to the next part that involves Julian Assange and Wikileaks.

On April 11th, 2019, the Julian Assange indictment was unsealed in the EDVA.

From the indictment we discover it was under seal since March 6th, 2018:

(Link to pdf)

On Tuesday April 15th, 2019, more investigative material was released. Again, note the dates: Grand Jury, *December of 2017* This means FBI investigation prior to….

♦The FBI investigation took place prior to December 2017, it was coordinated through the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) where current FBI chief legal counsel Dana Boente was U.S. Attorney at the time, while also holding jobs in Main Justice.

♦The grand jury indictment was sealed from March of 2018 until after Mueller completed his investigation, April 2019.

Why did the DOJ wait?

What was the DOJ waiting for?

Here’s where it gets interesting….

The FBI submission to the Grand Jury in December of 2017 was four months after congressman Dana Rohrabacher talked to Julian Assange in August of 2017: “Assange told a U.S. congressman … he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents … did not come from Russia.”

(August 2017, The Hill Via John Solomon) Julian Assange told a U.S. congressman on Tuesday he can prove the leaked Democratic Party documents he published during last year’s election did not come from Russia and promised additional helpful information about the leaks in the near future.

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, a California Republican who is friendly to Russia and chairs an important House subcommittee on Eurasia policy, became the first American congressman to meet with Assange during a three-hour private gathering at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, where the WikiLeaks founder has been holed up for years.

Rohrabacher recounted his conversation with Assange to The Hill.

“Our three-hour meeting covered a wide array of issues, including the WikiLeaks exposure of the DNC [Democratic National Committee] emails during last year’s presidential election,” Rohrabacher said, “Julian emphatically stated that the Russians were not involved in the hacking or disclosure of those emails.”

Pressed for more detail on the source of the documents, Rohrabacher said he had information to share privately with President Trump. (read more)

Knowing how much effort the CIA and FBI put into the Russia collusion-conspiracy narrative; and knowing how absolutely critical it was to justify all the surveillance that had taken place prior to the 2016 election; it would make sense for the FBI to take keen interest after this August 2017 meeting between Rohrabacher and Assange; and why the FBI would quickly gather specific evidence (related to Wikileaks and Bradley Manning) for a grand jury by December 2017.

Within three months of the grand jury the DOJ generated an indictment and sealed it in March 2018. The EDVA sat on the indictment while the Mueller probe was ongoing.

As soon as the Mueller probe ended, on April 11th, 2019, a coordinated effort between the U.K. and U.S. was executed; Julian Assange was forcibly arrested and removed from the Ecuadorian embassy in London, and the EDVA indictment was unsealed (link).

As a person who has researched this three year fiasco including: the ridiculously false 2016 Russian hacking and interference narrative; the “17 intelligence agencies”, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) needed for Obama’s anti-Russia narrative in December ’16; and then a month later the ridiculously political Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) in January ’17; the timing against Julian Assange was far too coincidental.

It doesn’t take a deep researcher to see the aligned U.S/U.K motive to control Julian Assange because the Mueller report was dependent on Russia cybercrimes, and that narrative is contingent on the Russia DNC hack story which Julian Assange disputes.

The Weissmann/Mueller report contains claims that Russia hacked the DNC servers as the central evidence to the Russia interference narrative in the U.S. election. This claim is directly disputed by WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, as outlined during the Dana Rohrabacher interview, and by Julian Assange on-the-record statements.

Now Watch This Brief Interview:


The predicate for Crossfire Hurricane was Russia interfering in the 2016 election.

The predicate for the FISA warrant against U.S. Carter Page was a Russia investigation, that included the Steele Dossier as evidence, and the use therein was contingent on Russia interfering in the 2016 election.

The predicate for Robert Mueller’s investigation was specifically due to Russian interference in the 2016 election; and the possibility of Trump-Russia collusion.

All of these predicate claims are demonstrably false or wildly overstated using the most tenuous of stretched interpretations.   This is what John Durham is looking at.

The fulcrum for the media to push the Russia interference narrative is the Intelligence Community Assessment; and the primary factual evidence claimed within the ICA is that Russia hacked the DNC servers.  A claim that is only made possible by relying on forensic computer analysis from Crowdstrike, a DNC contractor.

When it comes to reviewing all of the predication aspects, the CIA holds a massive conflict of self-interest in upholding the Russian hacking claim.  Thus we see members of the CIA and intelligence apparatus within media stories outraged over being questioned.

Without the initiation by the CIA, the FBI also is exposed.  Thus the FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining the Russia hacking (Crowdstrike) claim.

Additionally, all of those foreign countries whose intelligence apparatus participated with John Brennan and Peter Strzok also have a vested self-interest in maintaining the Russia hacking and interference narrative.

Most worrisome, Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack – but rather from a leak by a source inside the DNC.

This Russian “hacking” claim is ultimately so important to the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus; and right there is the most transparently obvious motive to shut Assange down as soon as U.S. and U.K. intelligence officials knew the Mueller report was going to be made public.

This entry was posted in Abusive Cops, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Julian Assange, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup, Wikileaks. Bookmark the permalink.

516 Responses to U.S. and U.K. Intelligence Agencies Worry About John Durham – Scrutiny of CIA Draws Media Apoplexy…

  1. fred5678 says:

    WOW! Is Mark Steyn wound up about “lack of candor” !!! I have never herd him this upset — even against Katz.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Delay, Diminish, Decline to prosecute. See a pattern?

    Liked by 4 people

  3. Genie says:

    So it is McCabe’s lawyers saying they heard from the DOJ that McCabe won’t be charged? Maybe just trolling for an obstructive response? I think I’ll wait for the actual DOJ press release, but not holding my breath.


  4. Tell Right says:

    Durham was appointed by then acting AG Whitaker. Whitaker got to his position because then AG Sessions appointed him Chief of Staff.

    Jessie Liu’s Treasury appointment was rescinded in part because she didn’t prosecute leaker James Wolfe. And we know James Wolfe was the leaker because his copy of the FISA application had a leak marker in it: an altered date stamp at the bottom of one of the pages. His copy was given to him back when….you guessed it…Sessions was the AG.

    I’m starting to take back my Sleepy Sessions accusations and think of him again as the Silent Executioner.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Still not convinced that AG Bill Barr actually runs the Department of Justice rather than being simply a figurehead. The swamp is so deep and the leftwing corruption so widespread & entrenched that it will take at least 10 years to fix the broken justice system; that is, if it can be repaired at all.

    ~~~~~~~ TRUMP 2020 ~~~~~~~

    Liked by 5 people

  6. CM-TX says:

    Ok, can we call it yet?

    (Hint: “Trust The Plan” was to create a divide– keeping the believers portion COMPLACENT.)

    “A Republic [ma’am], if YOU can keep it!” ~Ben Franklin (His reply, when asked what kind of Gov they came up with.)
    Understand, it [Gov gone awry] will NEVER correct itself!

    Liked by 8 people

    • Joemama says:

      Nope, I don’t believe that you can “call it” yet.

      Can you conceive of a strategy that might unroll over 5, 6, 7 or 8 years? Can you conceive of a strategy that would require PDJT to be a “lame duck” to be effective?

      I can. I think we can see some action later this Spring/early Summer, but that the big fireworks will fly in PDJT’s second term.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. willthesuevi says:

    On the plus side I guess is this information is FINALLY getting out to the Dancing with the Stars”, “Pokemon Go” and “Americas Got Talent” crowd.

    Interesting times.


  8. 6x47 says:

    No worries, overseas spy agencies! Didn’t you see that Andrew McCabe just got a pass? Nobody will be prosecuted for anything related to SpyGate, FISA abuse, or anything else directly or indirectly related to the attempted coup against President Trump.

    Meanwhile, Roger Stone will die in prison for being a smartass.

    It’s a Big Club, and we ain’t in it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Y’all Know What Time It is says:

      They passed on Manafort back when they first investigated him.Then when they could smear Trump, they revisited the matter and Andrea Chalupa or someone had the Ukrainians fabricate ‘the black ledger’ to revive the case against Manafort. Meanwhile Podesta was allowed to avoid any penalty for the same “Offense.”

      Liked by 3 people

    • Deplorable Texan says:

      They HAVE to protect Obama…….to big to fail on steroids, the elite edition. They fear the whole system will collapse if we were to know the truth.

      How many ways from Sunday are we? Seems like way more than 6.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Joemama says:

      In the big scheme of things, McCabe lying to the FBI and leaking to the press is small potatoes. Is that what you want to expend your ammo on?

      Yes, it would have been satisfying to see the dirtbag pay a price, but there are Coups, uranium sales, state secret and critical technology sales and other huge crimes out there.


  9. IGiveUp says:

    Dems will have hearings to investigate the DOJ’s Stone decision. Will Repubs have Senate hearings to investigate the DOJ’s McCabe decision?

    Liked by 1 person

    • IGiveUp says:

      and btw, feel free to violate the law of your choice. In America today, we each get a pass. And make it a good one like Andrew just did!


  10. Didnt Barr report that Durhams investigation would not be over until late spring-early summer?
    Duh? And, he wouldnt cut corners and would collect enough evidence in the correct way?

    Liked by 1 person

  11. solomonpal says:

    Ok … where are we at on the rollercoaster ride.


  12. Komrade Retslag says:

    Treepers should memorize the names of the two prosecutors that declined to indict Andrew McCabe for lying and leaking to the press.

    Their names are J.P. Cooney and Molly Gaston.

    They are the Chief and Assistant Attorneys for the Fraud and Public Corruption Section.
    Their names are on the letter informing McCabe he will not be charged.

    These people had proof of 3 counts of lying, from the IG report. I don’t what the details are for why they are declined to prosecute. But, it is very suspicious when compared to the General Flynn and Roger Stone cases. Why were Flynn and Stone prosecuted and not McCabe?

    This is firm evidence that we have a two-tiered justice system. One for the deep state, and another for everyone else.

    Remember these names, and keep a sharp eye for them in future legal situations. If they are ever nominated for higher positions requiring Senate confirmation, we can write our Senators and ask them not to confirm.

    If Attorney General Barr were really doing his job, he would seriously question these two, and make really sure that they had good reasons to let McCabe off. But, from my point of view, they had evidence enough to prosecute, especially when compared to the Flynn and Stone cases. Has Barr personally questioned these prosecutors?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Randolph Scott says:

      Pray that Henry Bowman visits these two.


    • Republicanvet91 says:

      Yes, they had enough evidence to prosecute. If they did not, I highly doubt Horowitz would have included each instance in his report.

      It should make one wonder, if an IG finds something so blatant and follows procedure with a referral, why hang your ass in the air when other officials ignore whatever is found?


    • joebkonobi says:

      It appears the Durham is the last chance for prosecutions. If he does not prosecute then all has been successfully swept under the rug and the rule of law is dead in America and is replaced by a government of tyranny. If the government can get away with this, what can’t they get away with? God help us please.

      Liked by 2 people

  13. islandpalmtrees says:

    I don’t believe Assange would still be alive, if he had revealed what he knows. Report after report of Julian Assange being mistreated by the guards and pleas for help by fellow prisoners,
    to help Assange.. Tell us all we need to know about the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI and U.K intelligence apparatus.

    Sundance Writes:
    “Most worrisome, Julian Assange is the only person with direct knowledge of how Wikileaks gained custody of the DNC emails; and Assange has claimed he has evidence it was not from a hack – but rather from a leak by a source inside the DNC.”

    Liked by 4 people

  14. islandpalmtrees says:

    No-one within their right mind would trust the CIA, FBI and NSA now. Yet, the Crowdstrike organization has members of all three running it. With a member of the CIA as it’s founder.

    Now, some how we are expected to believe the lies from the DNC who asked for their help.

    Sundance Writes:
    “Without the initiation by the CIA, the FBI also is exposed. Thus the FBI holds a massive interest in maintaining the Russia hacking (Crowdstrike) claim.”

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Elle says:

    I choose to be optimistic. I prefer to believe that when McCabe lost his top cover of the judges, he quickly cooperated or… as noted… this does not prevent him from being indicted in the future.

    The alternative is too unpleasant to contemplate as then it seems Barr was rubbing our face in it.

    Am I the only one that was shocked that Barr acknowledged in his interview the other day that they had briefed him that they wanted the sentence on Stone? Then Barr kinda rambles, somewhat incoherently, about how it wasn’t what they agreed on without ever assuring us he told them no flipping way he’d allow such a travesty of justice. But they apparently felt comfortable enough to brief him that that was what they wanted. That just seemed crazy to me. I sure hope this is a Rico case and we are just seeing the edges of the dealing going on.


    • gda53 says:

      Do you want to indict McCabe for ‘lack of candor”, basically a charge unconnected to the coup and probably at best involving a probation-type sentence soon forgotten?

      Or do you want to charge him under RICO for the coup against the President, forever staining him in the history books?

      I know what I want. I don’t see how this changes that, but I understand many are operating on jangled nerves and the all consuming thirst for revenge NOW!

      Liked by 2 people

  16. Brittney says:


    It appears P/T got blindsided outplayed for the moment…I do not know.

    P/T news conference JUST-2-days ago going after McCabe;
    were is Comey, what is happening with “McCabe”???, what happening to Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, it was a setup, false documents and everyone knows

    Entire news conference 2-days ago:
    They treated Roger Stone very badly they treated everybody very badly, and if you look at the Mueller investigation, it was a scam, because it was illegally set up, it was set up based upon false documentation, of false documents you look at what happened and how many people were hurt, their lives were destroyed, and nothing happened to the people that did it, is such a scam, were is Comey, what is happening with McCabe, what happening to Lisa Page, and Peter Strzok, it was a set-up, it was a disgrace for our country and everyone knows it, everyone,

    IMO President Trump might have been outplayed for the moment and there has to be a Big Chess-Move by P/T shortly.

    We know that P/T has been watching Barr and the President (American people) Barr would reveal himself by spring…

    Maybe P/T just got his answer and doesn’t have to wait for this spring? And if so, P/T needs to take actions according to many of Judicial Watch recommendations given over the last 2-years.

    P/T is 100% responsible for justice and must use his powers according to the Constitution and implement justice.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. I beginning to believe that “ain’t nuttin gonna happen – suck it up – have a drink and forget about it.”


  18. CNN_sucks says:

    For the first time I agreed with the demonrats. Go get that goddamn bagpipe SOB, impeached that SOB and charge him with obstruction of justice.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Robert Arvanitis says:

    My great fear is that someone close to Trump exploits his patriotism — “Mr. President, you can catch a few rats if you push this, but more than punishing rogues, you are damaging vital national institutions, now when we show a unified front to Xi, and Putin, and the mullahs…”
    And being a true patriot, the president sadly agrees.


  20. Republicanvet91 says:

    All of this detail on who is being questioned suggests this is a serious investigation. The question is, will there be serious consequences?

    Liked by 1 person

  21. jello333 says:

    Whenever I see that picture of them hauling off Julian, I wanna cry…. AND I feel I could literally kill someone. What they have done to that guy, that FEARLESS HERO, is absolutely SICK. Hang in there, Julian. 😦

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Offtie says:

    Maybe our 5-eyes mates should bethink themselves about getting involved in US politics and We the People for which it stands. Further they should recognize that the Nazis and old what’s his name’s (the Devil) plans for Europe and the World are at an end.


  23. aumechanic says:

    And we have already seen how well barr is at getting rid of witnesses, epstain didn’t kill hisself.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s