The DC Cover-up That’s As Big As Spygate…

Former U.S. Attorney for DC, Jessie Liu, is scheduled for a Senate confirmation hearing this upcoming Thursday at 10:00am.  There’s also an unreported background story connected to the DOJ, Rod Rosenstein and Ms. Liu so controversial, it’s as big as Spygate.

In the event any Senator on the approval committee would be brave enough to question the participant here’s the story:

EVENT ONE – On February 9th, 2018, the media reported on text messages from 2017 between Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-Chairman Mark Warner and Chris Steele’s lawyer, a lobbyist named Adam Waldman.  In 2017 and 2018 Mr. Waldman represented the interests of dossier author Chris Steele and Russian Billionaire Oleg Deripaska.

There was some initial media discussion of the text messages, and some eyebrows raised over why the Vice-Chairman of the SSCI would make statements saying “he would rather not have a paper trail” around the Steele communication, but generally speaking the DC media dropped the story quickly.  It just didn’t fit the anti-Trump narrative in early 2018.

Unfortunately, because of the lack of media curiosity some rather elementary questions were never asked (let alone answered).  Questions including: •Why were the 2017 text messages between Mark Warner and Adam Waldman captured?  •Who captured them?.. and, perhaps more importantly: •why were they released?

The February 2018 story soon disappeared, and no-one ever paid enough attention to go back and see the answers to the questions….

We did.

EVENT TWO – Four months after the Mark Warner texts were made public, on June 8th, 2018, another headline story surfaced.  An indictment for Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Security Director James Wolfe was unsealed on June 7th, 2018.

Mr. Wolfe was indicted for leaking information from within the SSCI to four journalists; and lying to FBI investigators.

Within the indictment we discover the FBI were conducting an ongoing leak investigation throughout 2017.  Within that investigation a top-secret document was transferred to the custody of SSCI Security Director James Wolfe on March 17, 2017.  The details inside that document were leaked to the media.

The indictment describes FBI investigators informing Mr. Wolfe in October of 2017 about their investigation of national security leaks.  In December of 2017 Mr. Wolfe was confronted with evidence of his leaking to journalists including a woman now working for the New York Times named Ali Watkins, with whom he was having a sexual relationship – implied as a possible quid-pro-quo.

Wolfe left the SSCI quietly in mid-December and resigned shortly thereafter.   No-one, outside of the principle characters involved, knows about the investigation until six months later, June 2018, when the indictment is made public.  [Keep this in mind]

The June 2018 media coverage of the Wolfe indictment primarily focused on the affair with Ms. Watkins and Wolfe’s lying to investigators.   Headlines quickly disappeared as the case moved into the formality of legal proceedings between the DOJ and Wolfe’s defense.

No-one drew a connection between the February ’18 publicity of SSCI Vice-Chairman Warner’s text messages and the June ’18 release of the FBI investigation of Wolfe from inside the SSCI the prior year (2017).

EVENT THREE – Slightly less than two months after release of the Wolfe indictment, another headline story.  On July 21st, 2018, the DOJ/FBI declassified and publicly released the FISA application(s) used against former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.

The release was connected to a FOIA case filed by the New York Times the year prior [NOTE THIS].  There has never been a good explanation why the application was declassified and released.  Despite the pre-existing NYT FOIA case, it never made sense why the DOJ/FBI did not attempt to deny the FOIA request.  The request was a FOIA for FISA information, the highest security classification possible.  It would have been very easy to deny the FOIA simply because the NYT was seeking classified documents.  A no brainer for shielding any release.  FISA is classified “Top-Secret”.

So, given the nature of the FISA application itself; and considering the DOJ had denied a similar request from congress; why did the DOJ/FBI suddenly decide it was okay to release the FISA application to the public?

[Short Answer (ah-ha moment): The DOJ/FBI knew the New York Times already had it.]

The media discussion of the FISA application release was very heavy.  The story consumed a great deal of air time, print coverage and debate from the release on July 21st, 2018, all the way through to the Inspector General Horowitz report of December 2019, and that coverage continues through today.   However, just like the Warner Texts; and just like the Wolfe indictment; no-one bothered to go back and connect the three component stories.

♦ Within the Wolfe indictment you’ll notice the “Top Secret” document picked-up by SSCI Director James Wolfe took place on March 17th, 2017:

♦ Within the Mark Warner text messages you’ll note the SSCI Vice-Chairman went into the SSCI Secured Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) on March 17th, 2017, shortly after 4:00pm:

♦ Within the declassified and released FISA application you’ll notice the copy date from the FISA clerk for the FISA application was March 17th, 2017:

The information within the three events (Warner Text release, Wolfe Indictment release, and Carter Page FISA release) shows the connection of the events.  James Wolfe took custody of the Carter Page FISA, delivered it to the SCIF, it was reviewed by SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner, and then leaked by James Wolfe.

It was the Carter Page FISA application that James Wolfe leaked to Ali Watkins as outlined within the unsealed June 2018 indictment.

Sidebar, a fourth albeit buried public release in December 14th 2018 confirmed everything.  The FBI filed a sentencing recommendation proving it was the Carter Page FISA that was leaked:

I only share the sidebar (out of chronological sequence) to emphasize there is no doubt it was the FISA application that James Wolfe leaked.  (Don’t get hung up here).

This explains (slightly, but there’s a much bigger story) why the DOJ/FBI released the FISA application in July 2018, as the result of a New York Times FOIA request.

The investigators within the DOJ/FBI knew the New York Times already had the FISA application from the James Wolfe leak to journalist Ali Watkins.

It’s going to get complex and I’m likely to lose all except the most dedicated readers who can understand what comes next…..

Keep in mind when the FISA court released the application copy to Wolfe on March 17th, 2017, there was only the original application from October 21st, 2016, and one renewal from January that existed.  [The release was March 17th, 2017 – the April and June 2017 renewals had not taken place.]

Additionally, within the July 2018 public release (of the March 17th 2017 copy), the FBI investigators redacted all dates relating to the copy they released to Wolfe.  AND, in all subsequent releases of any information from the FBI -through the declassification process- (including the initial version of the IG report on FISA) those dates were always redacted.

There has purposefully never been a clean copy release of the original FISA application and the three renewals.  Therefore there has never been a clean copy release without date redactions – which includes the FISC copy dated March 17th.

When the DOJ/FBI released their July 2018 FOIA compliant set of FISA application(s) they didn’t just print a new copy, instead they re-released the Wolfe version and then added the last two renewals.

RECAP Chronology:  February 2018 release of Warner Texts.  June 2018 unsealed Wolfe Indictment.  July 2018 release FISA application.  All three of these releases are connected to one much larger story.

Knowing that James Wolfe was caught by the FBI and DOJ leaking the FISA application, why wasn’t the SSCI Security Director ever charged with leaking classified information?

Here’s where the poop hits the fan.

Here’s the cover-up.

Here’s where another event comes in.

Keep in mind SSCI Vice-Chairman Senator Mark Warner was the impetus for the FISA Court releasing the March 17th copy; also keep in mind the purpose of the text messages between Senator Warner and Chris Steele’s lawyer Adam Waldman.

During his initial summer and fall negotiations with the DOJ, James Wolfe threatened to subpoena the SSCI in his defense.  The implication was that Wolfe was directed to leak the FISA by members of the committee; and/or Wolfe was operating independently but under the assumption of alignment with SSCI members who were not adverse to Wolfe’s leak.

The investigation of Wolfe (October through December 2017) explains how and why the Warner text messages surfaced in Feb 2018.  It’s highly likely Warner’s communication with Waldman was intercepted by FBI investigators who then questioned the Vice-Chairman about those texts.  Or it’s possible/probable the FBI investigators asked Warner if he was aware of Wolfe’s leaks.

That investigative scenario prompted Senator Warner to attempt to get out in front of the story about his secret and covert communication efforts to contact and meet with Christopher Steele.  Thus in February 2018 the Warner texts hit the media.  The texts go from February 2017 though May 2017 [SEE HERE] and encompass the exact period when Wolfe leaked the FISA application – March 2017 (with April discussion).

As the Wolfe defense team discussions with the DOJ played out throughout the fall of 2018, there was little movement. Then came another event, the November 2018 mid-term election where Democrats took control over the House.

Meanwhile, in the lame-duck congressional period Senators on the SSCI asked the DOJ to go easy on Wolfe:

Immediately after the 2018 mid-terms DC Attorney Jessie Liu dropped most of the charges against Wolfe, and he was allowed -under a plea agreement- to plead guilty to only one count of lying to investigators.

December 11th, DOJ sentencing memo [HERE], and then a very pissed-off FBI follow-up within the DOJ response to the Defense sentencing memo [HERE] dated December 14th.

In essence, after the November election, SSCI Director Wolfe was allowed to avoid prosecution for leaking top-secret classified documents; and the bigger issue was covered-up.

DAG Rod Rosenstein was in charge; the Mueller investigation was ongoing; and DC U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu signed-off on the plea deal.

OPPORTUNITY – Ms. Jessie Liu is scheduled for her confirmation hearing on Thursday at 10:00am.  Ms. Liu will be under oath.  If any Senator on that committee is brave enough, they would ask:

♦ Did the DOJ or FBI have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the Carter Page FISA application to the media?

We know the honest answer is yes.

The next follow up:

♦ Why was James Wolfe not prosecuted for that leak of classified information?

And then things would get really interesting… Consider the ramifications.

An honest answer would prove the media lied for 18 months about the content of the FISA application. They’ve had it since March 2017. That’s how the New York Times knew to FOIA it. That’s why the New York Times filed the FOIA, to use it more openly.

An honest answer would prove the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was a participating entity in the coup effort.

An honest answer would explain why the SSCI would only approve of nominees who would not expose their activity. Remember, the CIA, FBI, DOJ, ODNI, DNI, etc. all require confirmation from the SSCI (including Chair and Vice-Chair); and the answer would highlight SSCI members were engaged in a seditious conspiracy against the office of the presidency.

An honest answer would explain how Vice-Chairman Mark Warner’s text messages surfaced. Mark Warner entered the dragnet of the FBI investigation of James Wolfe…. and he was questioned by the FBI about his text messages. THAT is why Warner got out in front of them.

An honest answer would also explain why former DOJ-NSD lawyer Michael Atkinson was recommended to become Intelligence Community Inspector General…. And why the SSCI approved. An honest answer would explain why ICIG Atkinson participated in the second soft-coup effort via the “whistle-blower.”

An honest answer would explain the unique nature of all the interests in/around Adam Schiff, Mark Warner, the House intel committee, the SSCI, the DOJ-NSD… Almost everything reconciles within the sunlight of an honest answer.

An honest answer would highlight several members of the 2016 U.S intel community oversight known as the “gang of eight” were participating in a covert effort against candidate Trump; and how some of the current Go8 members have legal exposure.

The ramifications are far reaching:

  • Who was Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and DC Attorney Jessie Liu protecting?
  • What institutional interests did Rod Rosenstein and Jessie Liu consider too stunning, too damaging, too overwhelming, to confront in their decision to allow such a weak plea contrast against such severe criminal conduct?
  • Is it even possible for the United States Dept. of Justice to conduct a trial where members of the Gang of Eight were implicated in the activity?
  • How could the institutions of the United States government survive the publicity of members within the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence conspiring with foreign and domestic actors to eliminate the President of the United States?
  • How could the highest and most widely recognized U.S. media institutions (NYT, WaPo, CNN and more) survive exposure within that same trial.  The media caught participating in a government effort (receiving leaked classified information) intended to eliminate the presidency of Donald John Trump?

The downstream consequences are quite dramatic. The answer to those questions could create an explosion strong enough to split the atom within the swamp.

Here’s all the documents you need for citations:

.

.

.

.

.

…”Ms. Liu, did the DOJ have evidence that SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaked the FISA application used against U.S. Person Carter Page?”…

They won’t ask.

Here’s the Link To The Committee Members

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Abusive Cops, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Treason, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

664 Responses to The DC Cover-up That’s As Big As Spygate…

  1. Tom Hansen says:

    We know that Richard Burr, Chairman of the SSCI is anti-Trump and needs to be accountable for his involvement in the coup as well. But, we know, in addition to Warner, that Pelosi, Schumer, and Adam Schiff are part of the gang of eight and have known of this cover up among other cover ups.
    Their involvement of the coup has been very heavy handed.

    But what concerns me the most is on the Republican side of the Gang of Eight. We know about Burr, but what did McConnell, McCarthy, and Collins know, and particularly Paul Ryan prior to McCarthy. What were their roles during the coup attempt. Were they able to communicate with Trump their concerns regarding the intelligence they received? Or did any of them stay silent and let the President dangle during the Russian hoax, Mueller investigation, and the Ukrainian based impeachment hoax?

    Liked by 6 people

    • All the Republcans on the SSCI had to have know. Also, Paul Ryan probably knew but somehow I do not think Collins would know and not sure about McCarthy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • dd_sc says:

        Rep. Collins is Judiciary Committee so he is not Gang of 8. McCarty became Minority Leader in 2018 so the coup was already happening when he got there; he was never briefed by Brennan.

        Rep. Nunes appears to be the odd man out from the 2016 Gang of 8. He was quickly brought up on an ethics violation and had to recuse himself for a while. Speaker Ryan didn’t elevate the next Republican in line to be interim chairman while Nunes was recused.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Jan says:

          I truly believe that Devin Nunes was not given the same briefing as McConnell, Feinstein, Reid, Schiff, Burr, Warner, Pelosi & Ryan in August-September 2016. Lying Brennan testified that he gave his briefing to each of the Gang of 8 individually.

          Reid immediately turned around and wrote a letter to Comey demanding an investigation of the Trump campaign.

          After the election in November, Feinstein wanted off the Committee and moved over to the Senate Judiciary Committee. I don’t think she wanted anything to do w/Intel members & the coup.

          Liked by 1 person

          • dd_sc says:

            I think you’re giving Feinstein too much credit. I think her move to the Judiciary Committee was a lateral move to get a member of the conspirators on that committee ahead of any investigations – implies the Judiciary Committee was clean.

            One of her first actions was to leak the Glen Simpson closed door testimony. Who knows what else her staff was doing.

            Like

      • hitgirl18 says:

        Liu another traitorous scumbag! I hope the republicans are not as stupid as they usually are and dont confirm this witch!

        Liked by 1 person

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        We all remember how Paul Ryan moved to get Nunes out of the way. Nunes was temporarily forced to step down from his own committee’s Russia investigation after the House ethics committee started an investigation.

        One of the early indicators of Paul Ryan’s corruption for me.

        Liked by 4 people

      • sdogood says:

        Ryan’s wife comes from a prestigious Dem family and she was a Big Pharma lobbyist.

        Liked by 1 person

    • huecowacko says:

      It’s similar to the Nazis and their “marching towards the Fuhrer,” they all are anti-Trump, they all are complicit, they all want Trump removed, and they don’t have to have deeply philosophical discussions in order to advance their agendas or their attempts to complete Trump’s removal from office. You ask me how I know, my gut tells me so, that and “intelligence guided by experience,” to quote Rush.

      Like

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      The Gang-Of-Eight involvement in the coup for me has been clear for sometime. One of the more major tells, is when we knew the CIA was actually involved in the coup, since Peter Strzok (FBI/CIA) is a double agent, came to light. You see the law says, the Gang-Of-Eight had to be told about CIA involvement within our borders. After that we knew or should I say learned about Eric Ciaramella. Who is also CIA. If the CIA agents knew, then the CIA director knew.

      Liked by 1 person

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        Side note: I am still waiting for Carter Page’s complete involvement to be revealed since he too is CIA.

        Liked by 1 person

      • islandpalmtrees says:

        I see know reason, why the rules that applied to Strzok don’t also applied to Carter Page. So the Gang-Of-Eight must have known about Carter Page?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Jan says:

          Not necessarily. The FBI didn’t get a FISA warrant on Carter until 10/21/2016. Carter didn’t join the campaign until March or so in 2016. Carter never met or spoke with candidate Trump. His involvement is more he went Russia for a conference in July 2016.

          He was involved with the FBI/DOJ in getting 3 Russians indicted out of operations in 2013 or 2014–2 were tried & convicted on his testimony; the other one was not tried because he escaped back to Russia. The trial on the 2 Russians ended about March 2016.

          His other involvements seems to evolve around Stefan Halper–attending a conference, discussions w/him and emails. And as we know Halper is a CIA operative, mainly operating out of the UK. (He was paid $1 million by DOD over 2015-16)

          Carter wrote a letter to Comey in September that he was hearing rumors he was being surveilled and asked to come in and talk with the FBI. Comey never responded. In October 2016, he wrote another letter that he sent out to some intel people.

          He is hard to pin down in an interview. The latest revealing that he is/was a CIA operative has yet to be analyzed in any writings I’ve seen in the last couple of weeks, but then I’ve had a lot to read lately.

          Like

    • Issy says:

      One Man started digging and his name was Devin Nunes. He found evidence and warned President Trump. It just took one honest man to stand up to start to turn the tide for POTUS. They tried to sideline Nunes too, but he persevered. We owe him an enormous debt of gratitude.

      You can understand what he did and the risk he took by reading Lee Smith’s book “The Plot Against The President”.

      Liked by 3 people

    • mauritia17 says:

      Nunes on Lou Dobbs said President pulled her nomination!!!

      Liked by 2 people

    • rondonmonson says:

      Lou Dobbs just repoted on this and President Trump just PULLED her nomination !! Woo Hoo, way to go Sundance !!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Ray Brown says:

      Who convinced Trump to pull her nomination before these questions could be asked?

      Like

      • Jan says:

        Either Sundance or Lou, who reads CTH & apparently talks to the President, or maybe the Senate Chair of the Committee who were going to conduct the hearing on Thursday.

        Like

    • tacocat43 says:

      Burr is not seeking re-election.

      Liked by 1 person

    • WardaddyFR says:

      What precisely does anything think they have on the ill named Burr?

      Like

    • vladdy says:

      Wish I could LIKE this …. Consider it “lilked” about 1,000 times!

      Like

  2. T2020 says:

    Thank you, SD⭐️👍🏻❤️🇺🇸 You’re a rock star!!!

    Like

  3. MJJ says:

    THE FEDERALISTS
    By Margot Cleveland
    January 28, 2020
    IG Report Proves Obama Administration Spied On Trump Campaign Big Time:
    https://thefederalist.com/2020/01/28/ig-report-proves-obama-administration-spied-on-trump-campaign-big-time/

    Liked by 3 people

  4. jello333 says:

    What’s the penalty for someone (any random person) in the gallery shouting out during a hearing? I mean I know they’ll be ejected, but beyond that… is it a crime? And if so, just a minor misdemeanor like “disturbing the peace”? Because if it’s not a serious offense…. well, I think you see where I’m going with this…

    [Random person in the gallery shouts out, LOUDLY] “Did the DOJ know that James Wolfe leaked the the Carter Page FISA application to the media?”

    Liked by 2 people

    • I like your idea…perhaps you could get a gallery pass and attend?

      Like

      • jello333 says:

        If I didn’t live halfway across the country, I just might. Of course my wife would kill me, so there’s that too. She feels the same way about things as the rest of us, but she’s told me in no uncertain terms she will not be happy if I do something to get myself thrown in jail. Which is kinda weird, since when we get talking about civil war or revolution, she’s all YEAH! 🙂

        Like

        • gustafus21 says:

          I understand your wife. I feel the same way. This 72 yr old grandma knows what has to be done – yet won’t be on the front lines –

          Our side must resist employing the violence and vitriol we see from ABC News surrogate army – antifa.

          We don’t want our loved ones to be early ineffective martyrs. She loves you , but knows we won’t get bathhouse Barry and wife Mike without a very well orchestrated ground game

          Liked by 2 people

        • gustafus21 says:

          I understand your wife. I feel the same way. This 72 yr old grandma knows what has to be done – yet won’t be on the front lines –

          Our side must resist employing the violence and vitriol we see from ABC News surrogate army – antifa.

          We don’t want our loved ones to be early ineffective martyrs. She loves you , but knows we won’t get bathhouse Barry and wife Mike without a very well orchestrated ground game

          Liked by 1 person

    • Patty in Porterville says:

      I live in Tulare County, CA, Congressman McCarthy’s district immediately adjacent to Congressman Nunes district. I just called Nunes office in Tulare and gave them the information from this article. Asked if Nunes might be able to get someone in the Senate to ask the right questions tomorrow. The gal seemed very interested and took the info and said she would get it to Nunes today. Fingers crossed that Nunes can get someone in the Senate bring this up.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. MJJ says:

    Deleted by Admin..

    Please stop posting movie clips. Movie clips, music videos, and cartoons do not belong on an otherwise serious thread. Thank you.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Streak 264 says:

    BREAKING: Mueller’s Prosecutor Abruptly Resigns From Roger Stone Case After DOJ Backs Down From Excessive Sentencing

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Marlee says:

    My uncle Gary is the man who plays the marshal in the tan suit coat. He was key grip on this movie and they gave him a little part 🙂

    Like

  8. Heika says:

    Add in this – protecting Eric Holder!?? WTF

    Liked by 1 person

    • Heika says:

      Rosenstein’s emails and calls days before the special counsel was announced in the article will blow your mind. While I am not surprised, I am stunned that it has come out! As suspected Huber was an Obama plant. Any wonder he found nothing on Hillary. My jaw is on the floor. He is buried up to his eyebrows in this. Did AG Barr actually read these emails before giving him the golden handshake? I think not! THANK YOU AGAIN Judicial Watch.

      Liked by 4 people

    • starfcker says:

      Two things to remember looking at those emails. First, it’s all been captured somewhere, and there’s plenty more where that came from (Here’s to you, Admiral Mike). And then let me quote our President, ” I caught them. I caught them all. ” Do the math.

      Liked by 3 people

      • gustafus21Z says:

        It’s deeply upsetting to read all this feverish inquiry – knowing company man Barr is negotiating the fate of Flynn, Stone and others – entrapped but certainly capital on the table.

        That diminishes our resolve to demand the big boys (and girls)

        I think we are conditioned to think trumps survival is punishment enough for “well intentioned DC veterans”. Who “may have over reacted to a reality show presidential winner. They were patriots. Actually.

        I can write the headlines.already

        Like

      • gustafus21Z says:

        It’s deeply upsetting to read all this feverish inquiry – knowing company man Barr is negotiating the fate of Flynn, Stone and others – entrapped but certainly capital on the table.

        That diminishes our resolve to demand the big boys (and girls)

        I think we are conditioned to think trumps survival is punishment enough for “well intentioned DC veterans”. Who “may have over reacted to a reality show presidential winner. They were patriots. Actually.

        I can write the headlines.already

        Like

    • Peppurr says:

      Rat Rosenstein. ugh

      Liked by 2 people

  9. redwishes says:

    Looks like my Senator is the Chairman of the approval committee. So I just emailed him and asked him to please ask her these questions. I also requested his explanation should he choose not to ask her. We shall see.

    Liked by 3 people

  10. youme says:

    Mainstream media loses their influence day by day….it’s all digital social media

    Liked by 4 people

  11. youme says:

    Liked by 6 people

    • starfcker says:

      “they can all return to private practice”. Bulls##t. How about they get returned to breaking rocks for the rest of their lives.

      Liked by 7 people

      • willthesuevi says:

        As much as I agree with you, I also know these criminals get more protection from the Federal Bureaucracy than the Snail darter.

        Like

        • gustafus21 says:

          Proves my point that until and unless we establish a counter cultural cable tv news network, acquire a couple mega city papers – yes TV and paper.

          And a don over education that throttles our public school system back to mainstream family values.

          I challenge any liberal, socialist, woke parent to defend the Super Bowl debacle in front of Millions of 9 and 12 year old boys and girls.

          They can’t – and it’s a rallying point should a few conservative heavy weights make it the central example which demands equal cultural access for conservative , yes, decent points of view.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Heika says:

      More importantly – everything they did, should be reversed as invalid and all charges turned over.

      Liked by 3 people

  12. Heika says:

    Sean Davis –
    “In a press release issued late Monday, the intelligence community inspector general admitted it changed its policy and its whistleblower form after an anti-Trump complainant alleged that Trump broke the law during a phone call with the Ukrainian president.”

    https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/01/intel-community-admission-of-whistleblower-changes-raises-explosive-new-questions/

    Liked by 4 people

  13. Patroit Act says:

    Mr President, you have the momentum and the public is on your side.
    Fire Barr and Wray, install temp AG Rudy and Sheriff Clark as temp FBI Director. Give them a squad of Marshals each.
    Day one: AG Rudy, RICO the whole DOJ down to SDNY, sort out the innocent later
    Director Clark, fire seventh floor and all field managers. Make them reapply for their jobs and drug test.
    Day two: AG Rudy and Director Clark, DECLASS (reason for marshals loaded to the teeth).
    Day Three: Rico Politicians and relatives involved with foreign aid fraud and money laundering
    Day four: Wolverine pack audits IRS and Treasury.
    Day five: 3 am raids on all corporate media owners and staff (rico would be easy,all on video)
    Day six: George Soros and children,strip citizenship and deport to Hungary( they will know what to do)
    Day Seven: Rest, Mar-a-lago

    Liked by 5 people

    • mugzey302 says:

      Consider financial audits for anyone re-applying for a job. The rest is perfect!

      Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        I’m all for getting rid of Wray, and I LOVE the idea of Clarke being involved. (You all have probably noticed I wanted him as VP 😉 ) But I’m not yet convinced Barr isn’t gonna do his job… thanks largely to the fact he’s got Durham working with him. We’ll see…

        Liked by 3 people

        • Deplorable Incisor says:

          Barr and Durham have had plenty of time to start rolling people up.
          If it hasn’t started by now then I fully expect the following:
          There will be another press conference laying out all of the crimes that have been committed, at the end of that press conference we will be told that none of it is actionable or would/can be prosecuted because of this/that/some other statute/policy/agreement.

          If Barr/Durham were going to do something, it would have already started.
          Right now I’m figuring that the October surprise will be zero prosecutions in an attempt to depress the vote for Trump. That is really the only play they have left that doesn’t kick off the 2nd American Revolution.

          Liked by 1 person

        • mugzey302 says:

          It should be obvious how difficult and time consuming it is to accomplish anything in that bureaucracy. Like turning the Titanic. Patience. We are “The Persistence”.

          Like

    • nimrodman says:

      “fire seventh floor and all field managers. Make them reapply for their jobs and drug test”

      You left off: polygraph test

      “Have you ever taken any action – or assisted in any action – counter to President Donald Trump or Candidate Donald Trump or others on his staff or in his campaign?”

      “Have you hidden, destroyed, altered, or fabricated any documents or evidence relating to President or Candidate Donald Trump or others on his staff or in his campaign?”

      … and other questions by those much more qualified and able than I am

      Liked by 1 person

    • James Carpenter says:

      Overall, this sounds a wee bit extreme.
      Nowhere do I see any mention at all of charging the SOROS family for their flight to Hungary.
      I suppose we taxpayers would have to take the hit for that too?!?!?!?
      It’s always just “one more thing”…

      Like

  14. Heika says:

    Neal Katyal, (a lawyer with more slinky in him than a slinky) wrote the book ‘IMPEACH” – the Case Against Donal Trump and he was one of Rosensteins consultants on what to do! WHA??
    Also Judge John Bates, the ‘anti-Trumper’.

    These were Rosenstiens ‘go-to guys’ for advice on the special counsel. What a skunk that little weasel is.

    NOW – RELEASE THE CRACKEN upon ‘little Rod’ – open the flood gates on that worm NOW… we have waited far too long to get this little sleazy mongrel.

    Liked by 2 people

    • margarite1 says:

      It’s a miracle POTUS has survived this onslaught! The best and brightest scumbags have done everything they can to take him out and maybe I’m wrong but isn’t POTUS the only target who didn’t get taken down?

      I suspect most of the GOP senators would rather see him gone but POTUS is too popular, too effective, and too indefatigable. I suspect their plan is to contain him ,as much as possible as it is to contain Donald Trump, and wait until 2024. Then they can resume their stealing without worrying about consequences. Nevertheless, I think Donald Trump is making serious change that will last decades including Blexit….and how we’ve all been scammed.

      Like

      • jwh49 says:

        It’s not a miracle. It’s our gift from Almighty God!. God is GREAT! MAGA 2020!

        Liked by 1 person

        • xode says:

          “I suspect most of the GOP senators would rather see him gone but POTUS is too popular, too effective, and too indefatigable. I suspect their plan is to contain him ,as much as possible as it is to contain Donald Trump, and wait until 2024. Then they can resume their stealing without worrying about consequences.” –> That’s why MAGA needs to: replace all of those Dems and RINOs in CONgress with MAGA candidates like Nunes in the upcoming elections; and have a MAGA candidate ready to take over in 2024 after Trump terms out. Nikki Haley has been suggested as president come 2024.

          Like

          • Deplorable Incisor says:

            Nikki Haley is not eligible to be President.

            Like

            • xode says:

              That’s questionable. She was born in the U.S. and it’s only case law and not the U.S. Constitution that claims she’s not a natural born citizen. Further, the corruption in the fraudulent courts, in the form of an aristocracy of attorneys that control those and their overall track record in suppressing accountability for other corruption, far exceeds the spygate and gang of 8 corruption that’s the topic of this thread. In any event, even 2 full terms of Trump won’t be near enough to clean up the corruption. MAGA definitely needs to continue with a successor to Trump after he terms out, and also needs to replace all of the Dems and RINOs in CONgress in the upcoming elections.

              Like

              • mushr45m says:

                Nikki Haley???
                She is a snake.
                Look at her SuperPAC for President started Nov 19.
                Heavy ties to Benedict Romney!!!!!!!
                Spuriously got (Ronna gave them to her) MAGA doner lists

                NOOOOOO Way. A Deep State Puppet.
                Maybe the Freedom Caucus

                Like

                • xode says:

                  Now your argument here appears valid just as the original argument of her being ineligible due to citizenship isn’t. You also make the critical point that MAGA needs to be very careful in who it supports as Trump’s successor. However, there definitely needs to be someone to take over when Trump terms out as 8 years is nowhere near enough time to get that DC swamp cleaned out.

                  Like

            • xode says:

              Nikki Haley being ineligible for president is questionable. She was born in the U.S. and it’s case law and not the U.S. Constitution that questions her eligibility. Further, the corruption in the fraudulent courts, in the form of a corrupt aristocracy of attorneys that control those and that suppresses accountability of other corruption, far exceeds even the corruption of spygate and the gang of 8. In any event, even 2 terms with Trump won’t be near enough to clean up the corruption. MAGA will definitely need to have a successor to Trump one he terms out, and also will need to replace all of the Dems and RINOs in CONgress in the upcoming elections.

              Like

      • Issy says:

        I don’t know. I think many of us are going to be asking about foreign aid and which government official’s families are getting a cut. More needs to be divulged about spouses and children serving on boards and employed by lobbyist. Insider trading appears to be a problem too. I thought that had been stopped. I guess they quietly did away with that rule. Pak money being transferred to the candidate for lifestyle enhancement. I didn’t know they could do that either.

        I doubt we can ever catch on to all their scams, but there are things that can be done to stop some of the corruption. If it can’t be stopped, exposing the graft seems to bring an end to some careers.

        Liked by 1 person

    • deannalaurence says:

      Wormtongue Rod

      Liked by 1 person

  15. youme says:

    Liked by 2 people

  16. R Greenhalgh says:

    I clearly understand this isn’t a “Trust the plan” friendly forum but can anyone [SD] please explain why it isn’t possible we’re now in the final phase of a huge drag net operation stemming from the leak investigations implemented by Jeff Sessions? And could it also be possible Rosenstein and/or Liu (knowingly or not) are part of that operation? This is a sincere question so please fellow treepers – no hate🙏🏻.

    Like

    • Joemama says:

      I suspect that your theory could be correct. Or at least part of “the plan”. I am not convinced that Sessions is a black hat.

      Like

    • Pedro says:

      What part of “Inside the Beltway” do you not understand? If it is happening inside the District of Criminals it is not for the benefit of the vast majority of this nation’s citizens; it is a cabal of snakes. No man is given power in our government at this stage of history without being vetted by The-Powers-That-Shouldn’t-Be (hat tip to James Corbett).

      Trust the plan?

      Grow up. You are too old for fairy tales…

      Liked by 1 person

  17. atomichillbilly says:

    Excellent timeline.

    I have suspected as much for years.

    But I doubt we can trust the swamprats to investigate themselves.

    Mitch McConnell doesn’t have the stomach for it, and Barr/Durham have too much “integrity” to do any strategic leaking of their own.

    If Lieu gets confirmed, we’ll know the fix is still in.

    Like

  18. atomichillbilly says:

    Excellent timeline.

    I have suspected as much for years.

    But I doubt we can trust the swamprats to investigate themselves.

    Mitch McConnell doesn’t have the stomach for it, and Barr/Durham have too much “integrity” to do any strategic leaking of their own.

    If Lieu gets confirmed, we’ll know the fix is still in.

    Like

  19. I have no respect for our current DOJ, including the FBI. I don’t trust them. I don’t respect them.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. mugzey302 says:

    If ever there was a need for a Special Counsel, it’s now. But finding such a person, not controlled by the swamp rats, the cabal, etc would be a Herculean task.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bogeyfree says:

      THIS is why IMO PT needs to have Sidney Powell as his WH Presidential Appointment whereby she is Special Liaison (think Justice Czar but a good one) between the WH and DOJ.

      She sits in on ALL Barr and Durham meetings along with all Barr and DA meeting (especially Treasury)

      PT also gives her the authority to declass any document related to:
      Russia Collusion
      the Dossier
      FISA Abuse
      FBI Contractor Abuse
      Uranium One
      the Hammer Program
      HRC unsecured server
      the DNC hack
      Seth Rich murder
      impeachment fraud
      Ukraine corruption and alleged money laundering of US taxpayer monies.

      She can read and review all of this info unredacted and reports back to the President. She in essence is Americans MAGA Insurance Policy.

      Yes, in the end AG Barr and Wray may chose to quit and if they do so be it.

      PT simply follows the agency hierarchy policy of next person up so there is no issue with Senate confirmation or crying from the left, as PT is by the book!

      But Sidney stays in place.

      Ask yourself, if Sidney was in this role how long do you think it would take her to get to these unanswered questions and so many more?

      1. Has the DOJ deposed the two U1 WB yet?
      2. Has the DOJ deposed Assange yet?
      3. What happened to the Wiener Laptop and the evidence on it?
      4. What happened to all 33k HRC emails that the NSA has?
      5. What happened to Mifsud’s phone and the information on it?
      6. What happened to the 47 Hammer Hard Drives that Montgomery turned into the FBI in 2015?
      7. Was all the evidence gathered by the FBI on the Seth Rich murder turned over to Judicial Watch and Ty Clevenger’s as their FOIA requested?
      8. What happened to the Rudy’s Ukraine evidence he turned over to Pompeo?
      9. What happened to the Lindsey request to Pompeo on turning over all Biden communications with Ukraine back in 2016?
      10. Did they ever trace the serial numbers on the PapaD money he was given?
      11. How long have they known Mifsud and Halper were ALWAYS western agents?
      12. Why hasn’t a joint investigation between the DOJ and Ukrainian Government not begun considering we have a treaty with them to jointly investigate corruption?

      Sidney comes with 100% trust by the American people where transparency, truth and justice is not just words.

      With Sidney in place the benefits are:
      1. PT gets a second set of eyes and opinion on all things.
      2. PT and the American people get peace of mind as we TRUST Sidney and with her on the job accountability, truth and justice can’t be far behind.
      3. The investigations continue and the odds of evidence getting lost, misplaced or overlooked is reduced greatly IMO.
      4. It gives Sidney a running start into 2021 and your second term.
      5. It gets the Ukraine investigation moving sooner than later.

      So if Sidney as the “Justice Czar” between the WH and the DOJ (Barr) works like I think it can, PT could do the same with Rudy as the “Law Enforcement Czar” between the WH and the FIB (Wray)

      And the best part, no Senate Confirmation is required!

      PT could make this happen with a stroke of his pen within 24 hrs.

      IMO it’s Pure Trump Genius!

      Liked by 1 person

  21. islandpalmtrees says:

    May I suggest, that one group is missing from the “The ramifications are far reaching:” list.

    I believe that we have seen more than enough reason to believe that the Chief Justice and at least some members of the FISA court are involved.

    Liked by 2 people

  22. awake_millennial says:

    BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Deep State Brings In Big Gun US ATTORNEY to Defy Request for Evidentiary Hearing on Previously Hidden Peter Strzok and Lisa Page Emails on Seth Rich
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/02/breaking-exclusive-deep-state-brings-in-big-gun-us-attorney-to-defy-request-for-evidentiary-hearing-on-previously-hidden-peter-strzok-and-lisa-page-emails-on-seth-rich/

    Between Sundance and this article everything is starting to come into focus a little bit more. The evidence really is pointing to a pre planned coup that was set up from the very beginning. Russia had nothing to do with it. And trump knows. That’s why he asked Ukraine about crowdstrike. And I love Sundance’s line “The answer to those questions could create an explosion strong enough to split the atom within the swamp”….. split the atom indeed. We just need the tipping point to get these senators to start asking the questions.

    Like

  23. islandpalmtrees says:

    When everything out of DOJ, Rod Rosenstein’s mouth became Bull Sh*t for me. “when he said, he did not read the FISA application on President Trump before signing it”. My committee read it.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. rcogburn says:

    Outstanding work! From the start, everything has been run through the IC establishment: DOJ, CIA, ODNI, NSC, HSCI and SSCI. Warner and Schiff are senior coup principals, who run the Congressional end of the operation, like Brennan ran the CIA; Comey the FBI, Clapper, then Coats the ODNI; Yates; then Rosenstein the DOJ; McMaster the NSC (where DOD and State loop in).

    Burr and Ryan are/were their Republican co-conspirators on the Gang of 8. Pelosi, Shumer, and McConnell were, I suspect, fully aware yet kept at enough distance for deniability. When Nunes became a problem, they (i.e. Ryan) forced his recusal from his own committee for “disclosing classified information,” then slapped him with ethics charges.

    None of the coup principals are still in their jobs, except for those in Congress. They have to be voted out, but they can also be exposed, as SD is doing.

    We know Warner’s fingers are all over Derispaska; all over the Steele dossier; all over the Wolfe FISA leaks; and all over Assange. Coincidence or not, Vault 7 was also released in March, 2017. Also during this time frame, Warner was pushing a bill to take away POTUS’ control over NSC staffing and give it to Congress and the IC –

    https://theintercept.com/2017/02/01/in-response-to-steve-bannons-appointment-bill-aims-to-get-politics-out-of-national-security-council/

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/steve-bannons-role-national-security-council-actually-unprecedented

    No doubt Evelyn Farkas had Warner and Schiff in mind when she admitted they were spying on Trump and shuttling info to “the hill.” How far down does the rabbit hole go with the Gang of 8/SSCI/HSCI?

    Liked by 2 people

  25. Bannaghar says:

    That’s a link to Senate Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs.

    Like

    • Thats where Liu will be confirmed for her next job- Domestic Terrorism.
      Do you want this Deep State LawFare plant to go on to do more dirty work?

      Call your Senator now, or anyone on the Committee, who represent all of America.
      Get Jessie Liu on sworn testimony…lets uncover this dirty business all the way…

      Have called mine and put out the word in flyover country- we will see.
      https://www.sayanythingblog.com/

      Liked by 1 person

  26. Another Scott says:

    Maybe we can get Jar Jar Binks to ask the question.

    Like

  27. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • Landslide says:

      Hope we get a more reliable source…..if true, our Lion is in full swamp-drain mode!

      Like

    • ElGato says:

      Sundance! Apparently your work found its way up the chain! She’s done!

      Liked by 1 person

    • DiogeneseVindicated says:

      Wow, it’s like an article in an obscure news blog reached the attention of the president!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Moe Grimm says:

        Don’t think CTH is too obscure anymore. Even the normies are catching on. And Dobbs I know reads here. I’ve heard him cite reporting here on two occasions. Lots of hard hearted Kith and Kin in our area read here regularly. Not happy folks. In a healthy country Sundance would be up for a Pulitzer. And win. Who here would deny this?

        Liked by 2 people

        • Joemama says:

          The enemy Shareblue/Media Matters/David Brock definitely know about CTH. They spend a lot of money paying trolls trying to disrupt CTH.

          The have failed spectacularly.

          Now David, and your butt buddies, just be nice and move to Venezuela or Cuba and enjoy the paradise that you so richly deserve.

          Like

    • Carrie says:

      Awesome news! Way to go Sundance! All the emails and tweets seem to have attracted the attention of the right person. However, now this woman will disappear and will she ever be questioned again? Is this the way the Swamp decided to sweep this under the rug again?

      Like

    • Deplore Able says:

      Maybe the President reads CTH!

      It seems that since shampeachment ended certain dominoes are starting to fall. Vindmans plus 70 NSA corruptocrats, Jessie Smollett,

      Keep it up President Trump. Keep the wins coming.

      Lincoln’s birthday would be a great day for an FBI/DOJ indictment.

      Liked by 1 person

  28. islandpalmtrees says:

    The CIA was keeping them informed. On what Peter Stzok, Eric Ciaramella and Carter Page were doing, for example.

    The incoming 2017 Gang of Eight is:

    The Gang of Eight are briefed on every covert operation that our various intelligence agencies carry out. They are directly responsible for oversight of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).

    (*** means they knew about the Crossfire Hurricane Operation and Perer Strzok. ***).

    It is also important to understand that nothing ever happens without these eight members of congress being briefed on the occurrence. If the United States are carrying out a covert CIA mission in Benghazi, these representative would know about and have approved. If the United States is carrying out a covert CIA effort in Syria, these eight members would have to approve.

    (*** means they knew about the spying on President Trumps campaign. ***)

    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/01/02/united-states-national-intelligence-oversight-the-gang-of-eight/

    (*** they did not get told about an operation once, they were keep in the loop with updates ***)

    Like

    • Jimmy Jack says:

      Definitely seems Page, Strzok and Ciaremella are C I A and were perhaps themselves keeping the Gang of 8 in the loop.

      I bigger question is to what extent has the CIA infiltrated itself throughout all our institutions and to what end. Their specialty is toppling governments….

      Like

  29. TwoLaine says:

    Lou Dobbs is discussing this now.

    Liked by 2 people

    • TwoLaine says:

      Liu nomination has been pulled by the President according to Devin Nunes on Lou Dobbs.

      Dobbs also days that it looks like President TRUMP is removing IG Atkinson too.

      Liked by 3 people

  30. Kristin DeBacco says:

    Great Lou Dobbs brought Jessie Liu. Devin Nunes just said the president pulled her nomination!!!!

    Liked by 2 people

  31. Carrie says:

    Jessie Liu is out!! Someone here managed to send the Sundance article to the right person!!! Yay!

    Liked by 1 person

  32. ElGato says:

    Devin Nunes on Dobbs just confirmed her nomination has been pulled!

    Like

  33. WIVoter says:

    Devin Nunes just said on Lou Dobbs that Liu nomination pulled.

    Like

  34. FPCHmom says:

    Someone in the WH is reading the treehouse –

    Like

  35. Moe Grimm says:

    Outstanding investigative journalism.Had to read it 3X, but it all fits. For that snake Burr, I’ve known who and what he is for almost two years, but no one should have ever been fooled by his dominatrix on SSIC Warner. Fiendstein as well. Burr clais this is his last term and he will not run again in 2004. If he did the normies in NC would send him right back. Ignorance remains maybe the greatest threat facing this republic. Everyone here should call the obvious contacts on this list tomorrow Wednesday 12 Feb (Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs) and demand they (Scott, Cotton, Kennedy as the rest are useless) ask Liu at least the two questions Sundance raises above. Slim chance they will, but let the bastards think. And by the way Lou Dobbs is kicking this tonight with Nunes saying he’s hearing PDT has jerked backed Liu’s nomination within the past hour. We already know Lou Dobbs reads here. My first order of business tomorrow just in case PDT hasn’t jerked her back….
    https://www.banking.senate.gov/about/membership.
    Scott’s reach: https://www.scott.senate.gov/ (202) 224-6121
    Cotton’s reach: https://www.cotton.senate.gov/ (202) 224-2353
    Kennedy’s reach: https://www.kennedy.senate.gov/public/ (202) 224-4623

    Like

  36. warrprin1 says:

    ¡ElGato! You beat me to it! Buh bye, Jessie Baybee! … Just looked more closely and saw that at least 4 other Treepers hit the keypad before both you and me. 😂

    Like

  37. CanaCon says:

    Lou Dobbs just presented this story almost verbatim then Nunes comes on to say PJDT just pulled the nomination.

    Lou should have given credit to Sundance!

    Like

  38. enduringoak says:

    Hi Treepers, Just saw this “breaking news” from Axios. Looks like Lui is going to be OUT. Hopefully out of government and out of law(fare). PDJT is the best President ever !!
    https://www.axios.com/trump-jessie-liu-treasury-us-attorney-838d1a3b-1d4d-414c-ac7d-77a7ba6d4edb.html

    “President Trump is withdrawing his nomination for former U.S. attorney for D.C. Jessie Liu to serve as the Treasury Department’s undersecretary for terrorism and financial crimes, a top position overseeing economic sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge.”

    First post here but lurker for 2_ years. What a great site. Sundance is amazing with his research. The commenters are thoughtful, fun, and spot on most of the time. StE I appreciate your moderating. I am missing Ristvan though. His reasoned perspective was very helpful.

    Back to my branch…

    Like

  39. CanaCon says:

    Lou Dobbs just did this story almost verbatim then Nunes came on to say PJDT pulled the nomination.

    Dobbs should have given credit to Sundance!

    Like

  40. waicool says:

    Winning! Jack Probosiak (sp?) tweeting Pres Trump withdrew Liu’s nomination today Thank you Sundance and treepers, you are making America Great Again

    Like

  41. Critical Thoughts says:

    Someone ask genius Sundance: if NYT had a full fledged COPY of the FISA, and “FBI knew it”, why the hell did NYT let WAPO break their story? Additionally, why did NYT incorrectly report the FISA was issued “in the summer”, incorrectly until the FISA was declassified?

    Like

  42. snarkybeach says:

    Here’s the Dobbs interview with Nunes:

    Liked by 1 person

  43. jstert says:

    add to the ssci shenanigans so well laid out here is cong. ratcliffe’s aborted nomination to be dni. it was torpedoed by the corrupt ssci precisely because ratcliffe is a swamp drainer.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. islandpalmtrees says:

    Obama had to know – remember what Page and Strzok had to say: this is being run out of the White House.

    The Intelligence Oversight Act of 1980 required the CIA to inform the intelligence panels of many covert activities and the president to brief congressional leaders of both parties (the “Gang of Eight”).

    (*** This means Brennan should have told President Trump about his CIA agents spying on him ***)

    The Gang of Eight are briefed on classified intelligence matters by the Executive Branch and are responsible for Congressional oversight of all Intelligence Agencies. They are the “Checks and Balances” for the Intelligence aspect of our government. Anything intelligence-related must be shown to this committee. If there is a U.S. covert operation, these members know of it and approved it. It is a very powerful committee.
    http://themarketswork.com/2017/05/25/john-brennan-heads-for-the-exits/

    Anything intelligence-related must be shown to this committee. Perhaps, an unwilling spy “Carter Page”.

    Like

  45. jstert says:

    i would have preferred to question liu under oath first, then yank her nomination and fire her.

    Like

  46. AIM says:

    Trump just pulled the nomination for her.

    Like

  47. Kay Sadeeya says:

    Maybe someone knew the Senate would ask Liu some awkward questions. There might have been an arangement to not air out too much Deep State activities. Just saying.

    Like

  48. rjones99 says:

    Just read this again. A couple of minor points;

    1/ Liu and Rosenstein will argue they didnt want to collect proof classified doc was in possession of journalists.
    2/ Whoever released that FOIAed FISA’s helped the SCCI conspirators. There would be no other reason to release it than to arm the media.
    3/ Anyone approved by the SCCI is suspect of being a traitor. I would think Trump should reappoint all without Senate advice/consent and challenge them to declare a constitutional crisis. Litigating the issue would be interesting.

    Like

  49. Fembottler says:

    And just like that Trump pulls the nomination….

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s