Day Four – Senate Impeachment Trial – 1:00pm Livestream…

There will be 24 hours of presentation by House Impeachment Managers (over 3 days); 24 hours of presentation by Defense team (over 3 days); 16 hours of Senate questioning; 4 hours of closing arguments, equally divided; and then a Senate debate/vote on further motions to include witnesses. If there are going to be witnesses, they will first be deposed prior to testimony. No witness testimony will be permitted without first being deposed.

The Senate Trial continues today on day four 1:00pm EST. Today is the third and final 8 hour day of arguments by House Impeachment Managers.

Fox10 News Livestream LinkFox News LinkCSPAN LinkPBS News Link

.

.

.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Impeachment, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

299 Responses to Day Four – Senate Impeachment Trial – 1:00pm Livestream…

  1. bullnuke says:

    Can’t watch it anymore. See ya tomorrow morning at 10:00 am for the start of the beatdown.

    Liked by 20 people

  2. Don McAro says:

    According to ABC News they have a recording and video of President Trump
    As described by ABC, the recording appears to capture Trump speaking about Yovanovitch to Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, former associates of the president’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C. The actual audio has not been released.

    “Get rid of her!” a voice that appears to be Trump’s reportedly says. “Get her out tomorrow. I don’t care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. OK? Do it.”

    Liked by 3 people

    • bullnuke says:

      I read it was from 2018, way before Biden said he was running.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Don McAro says:

        Has nothing to do with Biden

        Liked by 2 people

        • bullnuke says:

          But Trump’s Ukraine scheme was started because he was afraid of Biden being a running mate. Ask a liberal, that’s what they say.

          Liked by 3 people

        • John55 says:

          What is supposed to be illegal, or even improper, about what Trump says in the alleged recording? He is perfectly entitled to fire or discipline his subordinates. By all accounts Yovanovitch richly deserved to be fired, and is lucky she is not facing criminal prosecution.

          Liked by 13 people

          • Pedro Morales says:

            Yep! We have another pearl clutcher who is going to wet his pants about Trump firing someone. Its his job! He gets to do these things according to the Constitution.

            Liked by 1 person

        • Pedro Morales says:

          1- There is nothing immoral, improper, illegal, or impeachable if every single word of that tape is accurate.
          2- He has complete and total authority to transfer, recall, or fire ANY AMBASSADOR HE WANTS!!! PERIOD!!! Anytime he wants. He does not need ABCs permission. It is not a conspiracy for Trump to fire an ambassador and talk about it.
          3- Yanovitch was NEVER fired! She was transferred and is working at Georgetown for the State Department

          Liked by 4 people

          • Mr e-man says:

            Schiff said Trump had Giuliani trying to smear her so he could fire her. Like you said, he didn’t need anyone to “smear” anyone. He could just recall her back home and replace her for no reason.

            Liked by 2 people

    • Did he say: “Take her coat”? Before or after “Get her out tomorrow….”
      Asking for ‘her Momma’…….seriously…

      Liked by 2 people

    • Ellis says:

      She works at the pleasure of the president. She was clearly insubordinate and did not hide her feelings towards him. He was right to fire her. This is a non-story from a desperate activist press.

      Liked by 14 people

    • Nigella says:

      And?The President has the right to fire anyone he wants

      Liked by 6 people

    • TwoLaine says:

      Good for him! That is his prerogative. Get used to it. What part of “I’m the President and you’re not” do these people not understand?

      Next up Chris Wray and Dana Boente PLEASE.

      Liked by 5 people

    • John55 says:

      Assuming it’s accurate, so what? Yovanovitch is one of Trump’s subordinates. He is perfectly within his rights in removing her from her position if he is not happy with her job performance. And from what we know about her, she should be facing criminal prosecution.

      Liked by 10 people

      • Tl Howard says:

        I agree with you but what they’ll emphasize is the “lie”.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Don McAro says:

          Boom…… and I do not mean that is a good way

          Like

        • John55 says:

          What “lie” would that be again? And II’m not impressed with people here carrying water from the lying media.

          Liked by 3 people

          • Tl Howard says:

            Who’s carrying water, John? The point is they’ll pass off his comments without mentioning WHEN he made them (before Biden was running), and then they’ll juxtapose the recent comments and say, “See, POTUS didn’t tell us the truth about his feelings toward her.”

            Like

            • ms doodlebug says:

              Democrats mistakenly think they and the unelected, like Vindman and the WB, have the authority to tell President Trump what he can think and do. Silly democrats.

              Like

            • steph_gray says:

              This is an easily refuted lie.

              I’m through caring one whit what the left says. The majority is on to their nonsense, and can no long unsee it. Just keep on explaining the facts for that “third person listening” that Dan B talks about.

              Like

    • Reserved55 says:

      There’s not a recording in the article.

      “A recording reviewed by ABC News appears to capture President Donald Trump telling associates he wanted the then-U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch fired while speaking at a small gathering that included Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman — two former business associates of Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani who have since been indicted in New York.

      The recording appears to contradict statements by Trump and support the narrative that has been offered by Parnas during broadcast interviews in recent days. Sources familiar with the recording said the recording was made during an intimate April 30, 2018, dinner at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C.”

      https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/recording-appears-capture-trump-private-dinner-ukraine-ambassador/story

      Like

    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      “Go home to mommy”

      Liked by 3 people

    • ezgoer says:

      So what? All ambassadors serve at the pleasure of the president. He can fire any of them whenever he wants. President makes policy they don’t.

      Liked by 6 people

    • ConfusedLurker says:

      Does Trump have a Russian accent in that audio?

      Liked by 2 people

    • vikingmom says:

      Sounds like a “Bombshell”! I thought Parnas had backtracked last week and admitted that he never actually talked with Donald Trump?

      Liked by 4 people

    • ATheoK says:

      Sounds edited.

      What does President Trump expect the two Ukrainians to do?
      Does Igor or Lev look like skilled assassins? So it can’t be assassination. They have zero authority over Yovanovitch.
      Ergo; POTUS never said it.

      ABC is pulling a CNN self face slap.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Lester Smith says:

      Sounds like digital editing at its finest. Fake contrived 11 hour B.S.the hands of the devil compells the evil of man’s soul.

      Like

    • Pedro Morales says:

      That tape sounds like what POTUS says when he wants a resistance warrior kicked out of his rallies! LOL! Did they cut out the part where he says, “The security is so nice. They never want to touch anybody too much and get sued”.

      Like

    • Gavin Kirk says:

      So this tape was made in April of 2018 and Trump finally got around to firing her in May of 2019? And? This it? This is the big get? “President Fires Ambassador 1 year after talking about it at a dinner party!” That’s not an impressive headline even if you are a democrat.

      Like

    • The Demon Slick says:

      The media is pointing to this saying it proves that his stated motives were untrue. This is based on the ridiculous idea that you must have just one reason for doing something. That’s garbage logic. OF COURSE you can have many reasons. Duh.

      Like

    • webgirlpdx says:

      While they’re having a wet dream over this….perhaps they can comment on the hot mic of “Tell Vlady that this is my last election and I’ll have more flexibility after it”.

      Liked by 1 person

    • NJ Transplant says:

      So what? Yovanovitch refused to even put a picture of President Trump in the embassy after he was inaugurated and constantly bad mouthed him. Who could blame him for firing her? She was also involved in Ukraine trying to fix the election. I don’t know how someone like her can play the victim.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. maggiemoowho says:

    I’m watching a Turkish Soap and decided to check in to see what was happening at the circus today and nobody posted anything yet, lol😄, looks like nobody could take one more day of listening to the clowns lies about our President. God Bless President Trump and his team of lawyers, they will kick-azz tomorrow.

    Liked by 16 people

  4. L4grasshopper says:

    How in the hell are the Dems spending 8 hours trying to explain the 2nd Article?

    Liked by 3 people

  5. boomerbeth says:

    Episode#1: Rudy Guiliani’s Common Sense (Thomas Paine 2.0)

    Liked by 3 people

    • RJ says:

      Rudy, get rid of the colored wrist bands, you are not a teenager, nor in a band, nor going to a concert…the flag lapel pin Trumps all those rubber bands!

      Then work on getting your eyes working like a man who has had a good night’s sleep. Of course, stop the hands clasping in the “steeplechase” manner. View your efforts and make the adjustments that communicate more effectively.

      You speak truths, don’t let gestures, etc. disarm those comments.

      Like

  6. Harlan says:

    Good grief! I tuned in to listen to the defense team only to find the dims still blathering.

    You can’t pay me enough to watch those liars.

    Liked by 8 people

  7. H. Hawke says:

    I’m still waiting for ANYONE to explain the legality of basing an impeachment on an anonymous source resulting in the defendant never getting to face the accuser!

    How. Is. That. LEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Liked by 10 people

    • Lefty says:

      Its clearly not legal per say, but it doesn’t need to be. Impeachment is not a legal process its a political process. They are not the same. This isn’t a legal court of law, it’s the US Senate.

      Liked by 1 person

      • John55 says:

        Politics is a legal process, and the legal system is a political process. Congress has no power to to break the law just because it is Congress. the Senate is a legal court of law, in fact it is the ultimate legal court of law, with the power to remove even Supreme Court Justices from office.

        Liked by 3 people

      • gsonFIT says:

        I agree that impeachment is political. I don’t think it should be but it obviously is. However I think this trial will set precedent that the trial proceedings are criminal or at least have to rise to a criminal level standard for removal from office.

        But the doors will be open to America’s “impeachment vote of confidence” in between elections Which is not the way it was intended

        Like

      • The Demon Slick says:

        Dems: it’s not a court of law!
        Also dems: what kind of a trial has no witnesses?

        Liked by 1 person

    • Reserved55 says:

      Listen to Rudy’s podcast.

      Liked by 2 people

      • H. Hawke says:

        Do you have the cliff notes re: this topic?

        I’m not a podcast fan. Prefer transcripts.

        Like

        • Reserved55 says:

          Both articles are Constitutionally bereft.

          Neither cite bribery treason high crimes and misdemeanors. Abuse of power is whatever the House says it is, “wearing the wrong color shoes”.
          Obstruction of Congress is Constitutionally seperation of powers. It is meaningless as well.
          Rudy two options.
          Ask the Court to declare them unconstitutional or Senate vote to dismiss.

          Liked by 1 person

    • TwoLaine says:

      110%

      Liked by 1 person

  8. RI_Righty says:

    fagawdssake, these clowns are a freakin joke. reading from the same script for 3 days? tune in intermittently and they are saying the exact same thing. bug eyes needs to crawl back under the rock he came from. hopefully he loses in Nov and joins the legions of homeless around CA.

    Liked by 6 people

  9. TwoLaine says:

    For you poor saps who are watching day 4 of this tedious circus.

    I had my fill today in less than a minute of the Sh1t Show. NEXT!

    Liked by 5 people

  10. I’m not watching until tomorrow morning! I’m watching Alaska PD from last njght!👍

    Like

  11. cboldt says:

    How many times will we get “weakened Ukraine, “emboldened Russia,” and the hsandful of other false ultimate conclusions?
    Haven’t even gotten to obstruction of Congress yet. Maybe they’ll say they thought they had 24 hours for each article. 😉

    Liked by 1 person

    • TwoLaine says:

      Bite your tongue!

      Like

    • ezgoer says:

      According to Senator Ernst, all these House managers voted against aid to Ukraine. Wow. Expose that.

      Liked by 7 people

    • Zimbalistjunior says:

      My favorite part of this is that people can’t do math.
      Schiff et al harp on the 10,000 or 15,000 soldiers killed in war with russia.
      What they fail to mention is that those deaths occured during obama presidency.
      Idiot ambassador bill taylor testified on day one that this so called hot war is killing 1-2 people currently a week.
      Why thats 50-100 Ukrainians killed a year!

      Mui caliente indeed.

      Like

  12. Jennifer Verner says:

    Laura Ingraham said she was told that if this thing opens up to witnesses, it will last for 4 months. No way in hell that happens.

    Like

  13. MR52 says:

    Shiffy has brought the Ghost of McStain in to this.

    Like

  14. paintbrushsage says:

    I am convinced the democrats/media are attempting to protect themselves from VP Biden’s conflict of interest not being investigated, even to the point of trying to remove an elected president from office and the next election’s ballot. The repetition is to solidify their Ukranian narrative in the minds of Americans.

    Bloomberg: Biden says son’s ties to Ukraine firm don’t diminish anti-corruption efforts
    10 December 2015

    https://www.unian.info/politics/1208915-bloomberg-biden-says-sons-ties-to-ukraine-firm-dont-diminish-anti-corruption-efforts.html

    Joe Biden on Hunter: “I Didn’t Know He Was On The Board Of That Company”
    Posted By Ian Schwartz
    November 2, 2019

    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/11/02/joe_biden_on_hunter_i_didnt_know_he_was_on_the_board_of_that_company.html

    Liked by 1 person

    • freepetta says:

      Of course Biden knew he set his failure son up because he’s a useless sex addict as well as addicted to drugs.
      If I had a kid like that I’d probably disown him.

      Like

      • I am amazed at how many politicians have loser middle aged “kids” like Hunter Biden freepetta.

        Liked by 1 person

        • freepetta says:

          Me too Chloe. Money and power definitely does not bring good choices, happiness and health. Seems to bring more suffering and entitlement.

          Like

        • FPCHmom says:

          Seriously – the guy is 50 yrs old and he is having illegitimate kids with strippers he probably hooked up with during a cocaine-fueled bender. After hooking up with his dead brother’s widow while he was still married.

          Oh, and he was paid $80,000 a month because his dad was VP assassination insurance.

          What a total loser. I wonder what excuse his lawyer will cook up to keep his financials under cover next week.

          The whole money-laundering-to-a-family-member business is probably common practice in congress. Our tax dollars right back into the pockets of the crooked politicians. It’s sickening.

          Like

          • This loser Hunter Biden, does not seem to have made any decent choices in his life at all.

            I don’t think I have ever seen a more disgusting family, except for the Clinton’s.

            They should all be in prison.

            Like

  15. freepetta says:

    I will skip this sham. I’ll watch when PDJT’s attorneys are answering these psycho charges.

    Liked by 3 people

  16. Tl Howard says:

    Typical of GOP—afraid if they go after the Bidens, the Bidens will reveal much about some of them.
    ___________________________________-

    Byron York
    @ByronYork
    ·
    4h
    Sen. Cornyn on
    @hughhewitt
    this morning: Democrats have opened the door to Hunter Biden testimony, but Republicans are not inclined to walk through it. http://ow.ly/yA8k50y47Iw

    Liked by 1 person

    • L4grasshopper says:

      GOP should refuse any witness “trade” and simply deny House any witnesses.

      Then vote to dismiss or acquit.

      If GOP wants to interview any Biden, then call him up before a Senate Committee they control.

      Liked by 18 people

      • Ding, ding! Yes, finish this stupid shampeachment without making any deals with the largest organized crime outfit in the world, the Democrat Party.

        Then, when shampeachment is over – I know this very wishful thinking – pursue criminal charges against corrupt politicians and millionaire “civil servants.”

        Liked by 5 people

      • convert says:

        Absolutely agree. The President doesn’t have to “try” the Bidens in his impeachment trial. Prove the impeachment process and the conduct of the Dems was unconstitutional, unprecedented, unfair, and predicated on lies. Present their own witnesses and the call transcript UNEDITED. Boom. Go home. Then get committees putting together the corruption story…

        Like

    • thedoc00 says:

      The Bidens ARE NOT needed for this trial. All the evidence and witnesses the Democrats gathered is sufficient. Just need to move to have Schiff deliver ALL evidence and testimony, as he obligated to do related to the House Inquiry supporting the current Article of Impeachment before the senate. Schiff spent tax money and worked under a democrat passed House Resolution to gather the evidence and has zero grounds to refuse it.

      There is NO NEED to step into the new witnesses and evidence trap and ambush.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. Lulu says:

    I don’t think anyone is watching this. I hear no one talking about it in person or on social media.

    The only people interested are the media and DNC but that’s redundant.

    Liked by 3 people

    • maggiemoowho says:

      True, I was at the grocery store yesterday and when the cashier asked me about my day, I brought up the boring hearing and she and the man bagging the groceries knew nothing about it or even showed any interest in any of it. They were young people too.

      Liked by 3 people

    • jello333 says:

      I just learned earlier today that my niece (in her 30s) doesn’t know who Elizabeth Warren is. 😉 Or actually, she said “I’ve heard the name, and I know she’s in politics”. Same goes for pretty much everyone else running. She knows a very little bit about Biden (that he was VP) and Bernie, but that’s it. “Never heard of him”, for Buttigieg and some others. She knows that there’s an attempted impeachment going on, but doesn’t know why “and couldn’t care less”. She’s well aware that half the country blames everything on Trump, but doesn’t understand what their problem is. She’s smart, is pretty active on social media, and has lots of friends who I’m sure talk about all kinds of stuff. And yet…

      I took all this as an overall GOOD sign. 😉

      Liked by 1 person

  18. islandpalmtrees says:

    Hills has connections with Shiff, Soros, Steele and more


    The Washington Examiner reported:

    When former national security council official fiona hill testified before the house intelligence committee, she said that she could not remember the name of the ukraine director when she joined the white house.

    That person was eric ciaramella, the career cia analyst who is alleged to be the ukraine whistleblower.

    Hill was white house nsc senior director for european and russian affairs, a position ciaramella held in an acting capacity while still ukraine director, for a brief period immediately before she took the post.

    Ciaramella, 33, is now a deputy national intelligence officer for russia and eurasia on the national intelligence council under president trump’s director of national intelligence, the Washington Examiner previously reported.

    According to Fiona Hill resume she worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute from 2000-2006, just 13 years ago.
    http//www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/fiona-hill-open-society.jpg
    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/complete-list-adam-schiffs-top-witness-fiona-hill-and-her-many-connections-to-soros-and-the-deep-state/

    Liked by 6 people

    • J says:

      To echo the great English spy Austin Powers, “Thats not a woman. Thats a man, Baby.”

      Also very interesting that a 29 year old Ciaramella held such a prestigious position. Must have been his vast experience in Eastern European affairs.

      Liked by 5 people

  19. Garavaglia says:

    According to Gateway Pundit..Graham says he will vote against calling Hunter as a witness. Would prefer to dig into that situation at a Starbucks/sarc. as that is the more appropriate forum.

    Like

  20. fanbeav says:

    I will watch tomorrow when President Trump’s attorneys make chum of the last few days. In addition to showing videos of everything dem’s house managers omitted or lied about, I want to see a chart of each house manager’s name and how many times they either left out pertinent information or lied! Another chart of each house manager’s name and how many times they used their assumptions in place of evidence!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Zimbalistjunior says:

      Exactly.
      I want a point by point refutation of every allegation and underlying facts asserted by Dems

      Each lie and half truth and conjecture should be quickly delineated. Use a chart if needed. Add up all the bullshit.

      Then I want someone to say the obvious point I’ve been mentioning for months:
      That investigations began prior to Biden announcing.
      Then point out the power point admission that they have no case from yesterday. When the Dems painted themselves into a corner admitting that the only impeachable offense would be if the president SOLELY conditioned aid for personal political purpose.

      Then stand there and say to the audience
      ‘ I will let this sink in for the jury for a minute. Think of what this means. They admitted they have no case. They made it into a power point slide. And yet they wasted your time for months on this crap.’

      Then spend the next 23 hours or so making fun of Schiff. All humor and ridicule.
      Read out loud Schiffs russian conspiracy stuff from today in a Schiff type voice delivery.
      Insult him
      Insult his overly emotive breathy delivery style.

      Don’t hold back

      Shame them

      Like

      • jello333 says:

        Show videos of people like Schiff and Swalwell crying about how horrible it is that Trump literally, ACTUALLY asked for Russia’s help. Pause for a moment for effect, for it to sink in, and then say, “They were right, Trump DID do that”. And then show the video clip of him PUBLICLY, JOKINGLY doing exactly that.

        Like

  21. Hans says:

    Fiona Hill testified that the Ukraine embassy meddled in the 2016 election. She also testified the Ukraine embassy backed the wrong horse…
    What are the democrats going to say to the debunked Ukraine involvement when PDT lawyers bring it up.. LOL.

    Wait till thewhistle blower is brought… withholding the complaints from congress… changed first hand knowledge to hearsay. LOL.

    Writing this so I don’t fall asleep.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Like Rudy G said:

    “Since no crimes exist, it must be dismissed!”

    Liked by 4 people

  23. MostlyRight says:

    Day 3 of this.

    Next verse, same as the first…

    Liked by 1 person

  24. islandpalmtrees says:

    More than 70 days of testimony against President Trump without one day being permitted for his defense to date. Maybe we will soon see that day!

    Like

  25. delighteddeplorable says:

    Listening to Rush who just made an excellent point about calling witnesses in this fiasco in order to expose the Bilking Bidens. He says just get the damn impeachment thing over with swiftly and go after the Bidens in another way. There are plenty of options available for that.

    One thing that isn’t being taken into account, Rush says, is the toll this has to be taking on President Trump. He’s seen as larger than life and bulletproof, but….he’s human and the last thing we want is for his health to be harmed. How he’s withstood it all is unimaginable but because he has, the personal reality of being relentlessly attacked every hour of every day for YEARS is minimized.

    Food for thought.

    Liked by 7 people

    • fanbeav says:

      He knew he would be attacked when he ran for President by both sides. The love many Americans have for him and the good work he has done for working people across this country is his medicine!

      Liked by 3 people

    • MDNA I says:

      As Andrew McCarthy said, in a courtroom trial, you don’t open the door if the door is shut. Schiff has to know this. I wonder if opening the door was a trap

      Like

    • Garavaglia says:

      How does going after the Bidens benefit the swamp?

      Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        It doesn’t. But apparently Schiff and his buddies think that if it’s gonna come out, better to have it come out NOW in this “trial”. I suspect they think it’ll allow them to pull in a bunch of other witnesses and “evidence” if the Biden stuff comes in. So in a way, yeah it might be a “trap” to entice Trump to pull the trigger too soon. So I’m starting to think maybe we should NOT go after Biden just yet… at least not as witnesses. Get this thing over with first, and THEN go after them (and others).

        Like

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      Until large numbers of IC and members of Congress are prosecuted, I expect these “relentlessly attacks” to continue. As it stands, I have not seen one of them going to jail.

      Liked by 2 people

    • cboldt says:

      — He says just get the damn impeachment thing over with swiftly and go after the Bidens in another way. —
      Yep. Plus, the MOST that needs to be shown in THIS venue is that *suspicion* was justified.
      Both points – that impeachment is not the venue to proseucute the Boiden case, and that suspicion is sufficient to justify investigation – are, I think, obvious points.

      Liked by 1 person

    • jello333 says:

      I tell you how he’s able to withstand it: People like US! People at the rallies, on social media, a few good people interviewed on Fox and elsewhere. And even some of the few remaining decent politicians. Yeah, all that has to help a lot when he starts feeling down.

      Liked by 1 person

  26. LULU says:

    They should have opted to go short. Hit their main points (if they could find them) and not indulge in rumination. The latter is intended for effect. Or, when there is no there there, to attempt to reinforce one’s weak argument with repetition. Fatiguing for the audience…

    Schiff could talk for a month, 24/7, or longer, but he is a mental case. Rumination is also a sign of mental disorder…

    Liked by 2 people

    • shevee says:

      I’m pretty sure Trump’s legal team will be able to make an air-tight case in much less time. Just look what happened the first day (over the amendments). Each side had an hour to argue their side. The commies took all or most of their time while the defense did not. Boring “jurors” to death is NOT a good strategy and the defense team will not make the same mistake.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. Somebody says:

    Supposedly “A Trump confidant” recently told CBS news, senators were warned “vote against Trump and you’re head will be on a pike”.

    This was just now on my newsreel, along with the ABC story about Parnas and the ambassador 🙄

    I guess we can consider these unsourced, low brow stories a sign that the D’s know they’ve lost. Sheesh, I fully expect POTUS’s 3rd grade classmate to come forward with news POTUS did a report on Russia, Russia, Russia……….and if you put it up to a mirror it said Orange Man Bad…..Orange Man the devil 😂

    In all seriousness, I bet words to that effect may have been spoken. Senators may have been told by any number of people something to the effect…..POTUS has a 95% approval rating with republicans, vote against him in the trial and the voters will put your head on a pike. I’d add we’ll place it next Schiff’s 😛

    Liked by 1 person

  28. YY4u says:

    Busy today but wanted to drop by to give a big, fat sarcastic thank you to West Virginia and Montana. Without them voting in incumbent Democrats, the Republicans would have 55 Senators and not 53. (And I say that even though I like Joe Manchin and think he’s a good guy. But numbers matter and West Virginia should have known that.) And another big, fat, sarcastic thank you to the RNC who did not properly fund John James (Michigan) when he could have won, the candidate in PA (forget his name) and Virginia’s Corey Stewart. Without the RNC helping the Democrats, the GOP would have 56 Senators…add in Montana and West VA and there’d be 58.

    So a big, fat sarcastic thank you to the RNC, West VA and Montana from this Donald Trump fan.

    Liked by 4 people

    • J says:

      Stabenow is Michigan political royalty. And John James almost beat her.

      Gary Peters was in a fight for his life with Cox in 2014. Yes it was Cox vs Peters. Either way we were screwed.

      John James is running against Peters in 2020. I expect Michigan will have one truly MAGA Senator next January.

      Liked by 2 people

      • trialbytruth says:

        Stabitnow is an empty pant suit. My first introduction to her was when she was still doing canvas work for the dim party in Lansing Mi. She couldnt intelligently answer the questions of a 17 year old answering the door. I told her take.her petiion and walk. My mom was laughing from the next room. Stabitnow cankled on Down the street

        Liked by 2 people

    • Lester Smith says:

      Just saw Adam Schitt with his concrete indisputal evidence. Washington post and New Times articles. Are you kidding me what an ahole. Adam believes in freedom of the press. He says the press has the right to say and do what ever it pleases. Adam says he believes in and supports a free press. These libatards are fing beyond evil. Is this the rapture.

      Liked by 2 people

      • jello333 says:

        In Trump’s 2nd term, someone needs to push a test case through to the Supremes regarding Sullivan v NY Times. That thing needs overturned, plus a few other laws/cases that help “protect” the media. We need to have SOME protections, for sure… but it’s now gotten WAY out of hand, there needs to be ACCOUNTABILITY.

        Like

    • jello333 says:

      Manchin will be on the right side in the final vote.

      Like

  29. Zimbalistjunior says:

    Schiff re jumping that shark now.
    This is astounding stuff

    Boring as crap. But still astounding.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Heika says:

      He is emboldened and sees not what power has done to him – revealed him as the idiot he is. I have been boiling mad at the waste of taxpayers’ dollars over all this when today something dawned upon me. The more he is left to keep going without interruption, the more the world can see what a lying sleazy snake he is. Where else would such a low life get a stage at the top of the country than in the US Senate? An audience before the king!? (whoever that is in this house of jokers). I fantasize that the court jester will keep on trying to entertain us all with his deception until the king’s patience expires and then his head will roll. So there are some upsides.

      Like

  30. thedoc00 says:

    Ignore the Bidens at this point, for once Lindsey Graham is right and giving the correct advice.

    Liked by 3 people

    • MDNA I says:

      If Rs get 1 of the Bidens, Ds get Bolton

      Like

      • thedoc00 says:

        Bolton is poopka and irrelevant. It opens the door for motions for more evidence Schiff claims exits. Stick to evidence and people used by the democrats to support the current articles. Nothing new needed, they only thing not shown by Schiff is all the evidence HE gathered and suppressed.

        Liked by 1 person

    • mimbler says:

      Yes, once the witness door is opened, it will never be closed. Each witness will provide chum for the fishing expedition and require further witnesses. Graham may be doing it for the wrong reason, but it is the right thing to do.

      Liked by 2 people

  31. MR52 says:

    This is just Shiffy’s audition for his acting job once they kick has a$$ out of the office.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Hans says:

    Love it ……Schiff brings up the Video the missing Hillary 33,000 emails and the server… now that’s sounds like a winning strategy. Russia , Russia Russia…
    Rejection of Intelegence agencies… let’s see the ones who illegally spied on him.. Does Schiff believe this has any traction..
    Schiff trying to scare Senate into possible investigation of members… must remove from office.

    Like

    • Somebody's Gramma says:

      My biggest thrill will be when Ukraine really does turn over the Crowdstrike servers (or the backups to those servers)! HAHAHAHAHAHA. Anything in the cloud, lives in the cloud forever!

      Like

  33. Drogers says:

    Given a choice of watching five more of BugEyes or a two hour root canal w/ no anesthesia …
    I’m going root canal.

    *not even close

    Like

  34. What would be wonderful is if there is a true to life patriot with the talents of a John Wick movie character kind of decisive “problem solver” who would step up and provide a problem solving for the subversive corrupt vermin who are domestic enemies of the republic and enemies of the current president who has done very well to defend that same republic. Send those subversive domestic enemy vermin to hell and let them try to “virtue signal” and be thought police from there in hell while they are busy burning. Regarding that waste of human skin kind of stinking useless trash, let dumpsters be full of them.

    Like

    • JG3 says:

      How ’bout require they have to sit 8 hrs per day in middle school classrooms with Schiff-like teachers, revisiting honest Civics, Constitution, Law, Bible… loosing their position/pay/retirement, while they are being tried for their crimes.

      Like

  35. Mike in a Truck says:

    This is what it all boils down to: The POTUS (R) cannot discipline, fire,transfer,demote, anyone in his administration, nor can he withhold, redirect, stop,rescind, delay foreign government entitlement funds provided by us Smucks (S),without the explicit approval of the Politburo (D). This is the “New America”.

    Like

    • Somebody's Gramma says:

      This is why we elected Trump, right? Something stinks to high heavens and now we’re finding out just what/who that is. I love a good movie.

      Like

  36. JohnCasper says:

    Dear any visiting space aliens, please don’t judge the entire population of earth by this deranged spectacle and destroy the planet. Or if you do, make it quick.
    Thank you

    Like

  37. Schiff reiterating the foundational lies which undergird this manufactured impeachment effort that:

    1) There was nothing that the Biden’s had done that was worthy of investigation

    and

    2) That President Trump was acting politically in his own interests (of which there is zero evidence in the record) as opposed to rooting out corruption, which is among the powers & duties of the Chief Executive…..especially in the wake of the 0bama/Biden years.

    Schiff & Co. are only fooling the fools who want to be fooled.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. islandpalmtrees says:

    I would love to see J take the gloves off when defending President Trump! Make it a defense to be remembered by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Make it the bad dream of the Socialist Democrats.

    We are counting on you!

    Like

  39. Reserved55 says:

    Neeed a group chanting hey hey ho ho Schiff has got to go

    Liked by 8 people

  40. Your Tour Guide says:

    WILL NOT watch one minute with the threat of Schiff talking.

    However, all the TVs in my home will be tuned to the defense
    tomorrow. And, everyone else reading this should do likewise.
    Even if you don’t watch any of it, have errands to run.

    Trump tweets about Saturdays being considered “Death Valley”
    for TV executives. Nobody tuning in.

    Anyone else here remember another show with that name?
    “Death Valley Days”. Starring Reagan. He seemed to do pretty
    well afterwards.

    Liked by 3 people

  41. Tiffthis says:

    So the president’s arguments start on Saturday? This is why the house wanted it over 3 days. Didn’t want to give trump a weekday of rebuttal. And stupid Mitch let the D’s have it 🤦🏼‍♀️. They still don’t have a case, but wth?

    Like

    • fanbeav says:

      They have Monday and Tuesday also? I thought it was broken down over three days 8 hours with Sundays off for defense just like Dems.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Tiffthis says:

        Yes, they have Monday and Tuesday also. But it just sux that they start on a Saturday. Maybe they put together a killer video loop of all the BS we’ve been put through for 3 yrs to be played non stop on Saturday- would be epic 🤣🤣🤣

        Liked by 1 person

        • cboldt says:

          The Sunday talk show producers will have material from both sides to choose from as they compose their “get Trump” Sunday shows.
          That feedback loop will inform Monday and Tuesday presentation.

          Liked by 2 people

        • mimbler says:

          I think that is why they are just doing a 3 hour “coming attractions” trailer on Saturday. That way the real meat will be on Mon and Tue when people are tuned in.

          Liked by 2 people

        • jello333 says:

          Not really, it might be a good thing. I mean a lot of people keep totally different hours on weekdays vs weekends. So far, Dems have gone all during the week, likely with the same general bunch of viewers/listeners each day. But Reps should get a little more variety.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Mr e-man says:

      Collins demanded it. He probably appeased her so he will get her vote against witnesses and to acquit.

      Like

  42. shevee says:

    The Schiff show fiasco kinda remind me of this (without the laughs of course)!

    Liked by 3 people

  43. Somebody's Gramma says:

    I watched the two first days… Pete and Repeat, so I tuned out. I’ll be watching Saturday. Long live the Republic!

    Like

    • cboldt says:

      Pete and Repete were in a boat. Pete fell out. Who was left?

      Like

      • Mr e-man says:

        Repete.

        Ok
        Pete and Repete were in a boat. Pete fell out. Who was left?

        Repete

        Ok
        Pete and Repete were in a boat. Pete fell out. Who was left?….ad finitum.

        Sounds like this Schiff show.

        Of course, I am wondering which was was left and which one was conservative.

        Like

  44. Zorro says:

    Someone please give this hearing the StepOnAllOfUs cut off sign.

    Like

  45. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Like

    • MDNA I says:

      See several of us above. It opens the door for more motions to subpoena witnesses & evidence. That’s probably the rationale. Politically, leaving the Bidens as unfinished business after trial is also attractive

      Liked by 2 people

    • Troublemaker10 says:

      Not a fan of Lindsey, but Lindsey Graham’s full statement was that he didn’t want any witnesses in the impeachment trial. He says the Biden and Ukraine issues should be a separate investigation (not used to bog down the impeachment trial).

      So, he isn’t saying we should never hear from Bidens or investigate that. He is saying it should be a separate investigation

      Liked by 2 people

    • jello333 says:

      In other words, there will be NO witnesses, for either side. Fine. Just get this garbage over with, and THEN drop the hammer(s).

      Like

  46. Mars says:

    Isn’t it Day Four of the trial?

    Like

  47. Admin says:

    So Lindsay has removed his masked and stated he will vote against subpoenaing either Pedo Joe or his deadbeat son, Hunter. Graham has done nothing but talk and talk and talk. He never was an ally to POTUS. He is McStain 2.0

    Liked by 1 person

  48. disman2017 says:

    I’m not watching this Impeachment Trial garbage. It’s a total waste of time! Besides, I don’t need my blood pressure going up! What’s the point of bringing witnesses when we know where most of the senators are going to vote. Feelings over facts plus Orange Man Bad according to many of these Democrats in congress. Some of these senators (Bernie, Liz, Amy K, Kamala, Kristin G, etc) wanted to unseat Trump as president in this election. Talk about conflict of interest. I don’t trust the weaklings in the GOP (Romney, Murkowski, etc) until they actually vote. They better not screw this up!

    As much as i would like to see the crooked Bidens, the so-called whistle-blower, and all the rest testify and ultimately reveal much of the corruption inside Washington DC, I just want this trial to be over with quickly. I’ve grown very fatigue over all this. The swamp has to protect the swamp.

    Keep this crap on the cable news (Fox, CSPAN) and fake news (CNN, MSNBC) channels. They don’t need this on the local channels. My mom (who’s strongly pro-Trump, btw) is mad that this impeachment trash has pre-empted “Days of Our Lives” all-week. The impeachment was also airing on local station WPWR 50 (which doesn’ t air news and is a duopoly with the Fox affiliate, WFLD 32) for some strange reason during the first day, thus pre-empting all those court shows that my mom likes to watch. I guess enough people complained and the impeachment coverage didn’t air on channel 50 any more. (still aired on the local affiliates Fox 32, NBC 5, CBS 2, and ABC 7 plus WGN 9).

    After Trump is acquitted (they don’t have the votes to actually remove him from office!), the DOJ must investigate Nadler, Pelosi, Schift, Waters, etc for their act of treason. This act must not go unpunished! Problem is that some of the biggest culprits live in deep-blue districts, meaning the voters who keep voting for them over and over again are totally unreliable (Trust me, I live in such a district here in Chicagoland). Where are you, Bill Barr? These coup enablers have wasted millions of taxpayer money on these hoaxes. The American people must demand a refund!

    The more I see this Schift guy, the more he creeps me out with his endless lies and insanity. He almost looks like a cartoon character. Reminds me of the main villain from “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” with those creepy eyeballs.

    Liked by 1 person

  49. MDNA I says:

    1. R Motion to subpoena Hunter
    2. D Motion to subpoena Witness or Evidence X
    3. POTUS asserts Executive Privilege
    4. Go to court
    5. We’re here a year from now watching the same trial

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bubby says:

      Exactly! The Democrats want the Republican idiots for vote for witnesses to tie the impeachment up in the courts over executive privilege! Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory is what Republicans are really good at!

      Like

  50. icanhasbailout says:

    Day 4, everybody realizes it’s more of the same BS we’ve heard for 3 years running and nobody cares anymore.

    Let’s fast forward this to the indictments of Dem leadership please. It’s time to hang traitors.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s