December 14th – 2019 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1059

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.

trump-president-3

This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Stephanie Grisham Twitter @StephGrisham45

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

736 Responses to December 14th – 2019 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1059

  1. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 6 people

    • CNN_sucks says:

      Sounds like voters fraud. Gearing up for 2020. Demonrats are going to steal the election.

      Liked by 7 people

      • CNN sucks- if there is an overwhelming majority, they can’t steal it. We have to get out the vote big time.

        Liked by 6 people

        • Paprika says:

          This is a good battle cry and I agree we need to get out the vote big time!

          But this does not negate the need to take solemn measures to prevent voter fraud at any level.

          Ye old; “If you can figure out how to cheat an inch, you can probably figure out how to cheat a mile” axiom might come into play. How would we truly know in today’s all out political scrimmage?

          Liked by 3 people

          • Paprika- we have to be prepared on ALL fronts! NY is now giving DRIVERS LICENSES to illegals, along with a dozen other states.
            It is now easier for the invaders to get a license than it is for a native New Yorker to get the enhanced license.
            And their licenses are also voter registration.
            How convenient. Hoping and praying that our President Trump’s team is on this big time.

            Liked by 1 person

      • lawrencepaul1 says:

        Well they surely will try, just as they did in 2016 and every other election for at least a decade or two.
        However they have there greatest success in counties that they control and would vote D anyway.
        Now it elections were decided by popular vote, well that would be a whole different thing.
        Which is precisely why democrats want that to happen.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Linda K. says:

        They will try to steal it.

        Liked by 2 people

    • WIVoter says:

      I always believed the election was stolen from ME, all the other Walker voters and Scott Walker himself. Walker was winning until a whole boatload of votes turned up in, I believe, Milwaukee county. Evers stole this election and democrats stole the House of Representatives by voter fraud especially in California.

      Liked by 11 people

      • Deb says:

        Walker ran a very lackluster campaign, my husband commented that he didn’t think Walker wanted to win.

        I say this as a Walker voter.

        The Supreme Court victory margin showed that the GOP didn’t get out the vote for the governor race.

        Like

    • Chuck says:

      Take all the fraud out of 2 counties (Milwaukee and Dane counties) and dems would never win a Wisconsin election again.
      Same can be said in Illinois and Washington state

      Liked by 3 people

    • Jim in TN says:

      These people either filed address changes with the post office or registered vehicles at a different address.
      But that doesn’t automatically remove them. The letters were to sent to check. By not responding or having the letter returned undeliverable the voters are to be removed from the rolls. (If you respond, they follow your direction.)
      And for some reason, the agency decided not to follow the law to remove them in a timely fashion, so the judge ordered them to follow the law. (They were going to wait until 2021.)
      And nothing stops people from registering anew.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Sherri Young says:

    I posed a question (in substance) on the earlier thread “Supreme Court Will Take Up Trump Financial Records and Tax Cases – Consolidated All Cases and Granted Writ…”

    It probably better belongs here. I would definitely appreciate any info / light SD(s) and Treepers can render. TIA

    My question is: Does anyone have any insight into the case that appears immediately above this one on the SCOTUS docket, USAID, et al v. Alliance for Open Society Int’l, et al. 19-177?

    That looks like it truthfully could be “US State Dept Dark Money Piggybank v. George Soros, et al”. If so, discovery could be a huge stinkin’ deal.

    Like

    • cboldt says:

      No discovery by the time it reaches SCOTUS
      Might be a spin-off of … https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/12-10.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOSI_v._USAID
      Decision below this one is at 911 F.3d 104. Question presented is at https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docketfiles/html/qp/19-00177qp.pdf

      Respondents are United States-based organizations that receive federal funds to fight HIV/AIDS abroad. In Agency for International Development v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc., 570 U.S. 205 (2013), this Court held that the First Amendment bars enforcement of Congress’s directive that respondents “have a policy explicitly opposing prostitution and sex trafficking” as a condition of accepting those funds. 22 U.S.C. 7631(f). The question presented is whether the First Amendment further bars enforcement of that directive with respect to legally distinct foreign entities operating overseas that are affiliated with respondents.

      Liked by 1 person

    • ristvan says:

      Sherry, had to look it up. This is an extension of a case of same name decided by SCOTUS in 2013. It involves a 2003 act of congress providing third world HIV funding to US based charitable organizations. The Executive placed a funding ‘policy provision’ that the recipient organizations expressly have charter provisions against prostitution and sex trafficking (obviously HIV related). The organizations sued to remove the ‘policy provision’ (says something negative about them). SCOTUS held that the USAID policy provision violated their first amendment speech rights. Sounds nuts, but was 6-2. Have not read it.

      This case is merely an extension. The Executive (USAID under Obama) decided that the 2013 ruling does NOT apply to their legally separate foreign affiliates who eventually spend the USAID HIV money. The same organizations sued again, (hence same case name) and lost. They have taken it to SCOTUS where cert was granted (IMO properly). The issue is narrow—whether the US Bill of Rights applies to foreign affiliates of US organizations whose only US nexus is USAID money originally given their US ‘parent’. Put differently, can US policy strings be attached to USAID spending overseas?

      Liked by 3 people

    • Jim in TN says:

      Discovery is solely the task of the trial court. Appeals courts can send a case back to be done properly, but they don’t do discovery.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Doppler says:

    Must read article by former CIA who sees much of the connective tissue in Horowitz’s report that Horowitz pretended not to see: obvious conclusion – a coup, plain and simple. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/former-cia-operations-officer-doj-igs-fisa-abuse-report-provides-concrete-evidence-that-russia-hoax-was-a-deliberate-covert-attempt-to-overthrow-the-democratic-process/

    Liked by 1 person

    • California Joe says:

      Horowitz is good at using deliberate IGNORANCE to whitewash his Democrat crooks!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Jimmy R says:

      Bongino’s podcast of yesterday (Friday) also saw connections in the Horowitz report that Horowitz didn’t see regarding FBI’s use of the Steele dossier. Horrible stuff.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sherri Young says:

        Bongino pointed out a footnote that changed / refined the story about the predicate and timing.

        Catherine Herridge says to watch the footnotes.

        Like

    • fred5678 says:

      Great timely catch!! For slow readers, my summary:

      “The essence of a coup, which some might refer to as covert action, is the hidden hand. One does not announce that a foreign power is overthrowing the government and installing a new government. One pulls strings as if from behind a curtain, making events that are all part of a carefully orchestrated plan appear disconnected, spontaneous and serendipitous.

      As I read through the recently released IG report for the second time, as someone with a great deal of experience in military and intelligence matters, I see that hand everywhere.

      Per the IG report, a single report is delivered to the FBI in the summer of 2016. It concerns a meeting between a cooperative contact of a foreign intelligence service and a junior level employee of the Trump campaign, George Papadopoulos.

      This one report from a foreign intelligence service goes directly to the top of the FBI. The Director himself, James Comey is briefed. A full investigation is launched. Multiple confidential human sources are tasked. Wiretaps are ordered. A task force is organized. Crossfire Hurricane is born.”

      Liked by 1 person

  4. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  5. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Liked by 7 people

  6. Perot Conservative says:

    Mollie@MZHemingway

    “One main value of IG report on FISA abuse is how it definitively shows media lied to public about Steele dossier, Nunes memo on FISA abuse, Schiff response memo, and general Russia collusion hoax. FBI corruption would have gone nowhere without media collusion.”

    Liked by 3 people

  7. lawrencepaul1 says:

    IG Report On FBI Spying Exposes “Scandal Of Historic Magnitude” For US Media
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/ig-report-fbi-spying-exposes-scandal-historic-magnitude-us-media

    Liked by 1 person

  8. clulessgrandpa says:

    Did anyone watch the 3 hour OAN special about Rudy and the Ukraine involvement in collusion, money laundering to the DNC this morning? Devastating. However will it go mainstream?

    Liked by 2 people

  9. Perot Conservative says:

    BEST QUOTE OF THE WEEK – SYDNEY POWELL

    Liked by 17 people

  10. Perot Conservative says:

    Must read UK vote – explained.

    Liked by 3 people

    • LouisianaTeaRose says:

      FABULOUS!!!

      I think we all understand what happened this week, and it’s not a coinkydink. Trump unleashed a movement that extends way, way beyond American politics.

      And the Dems know it.

      That’s why they are so pathetic in this charade. If ya got RBG callin’ bullshit, this little abomination is already over.

      Liked by 2 people

  11. Moe Grimm says:

    BE ADVISED: OANN (One America News Network) is airing all of Chanel Rion’s (with Giuliani) 3 part series in which Ukranians detail DNC collusion with Ukraine in the 2016 presidential election and their efforts to make it known to U.S.DoState. The Morgan bank records documenting Hunter Biden transactions are also covered in the series – the entries are clearly shown. Not to be missed. I’ve yet to see anything on this as comprehensive as this OANN series. Find your channel/s here: https://www.oann.com/wheretowatch/. It’s to be aired again tonight (Saturday) and also twice tomorrow (Sunday). https://www.oann.com/schedule/. Yuriy Lutsenko on Yovonovitch cut is here, but the series reveals much more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgKGjoIkaXU.

    Liked by 5 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      Rudy probably had two or three “mainstream” outlets to go through… and of those, OAN probably has the biggest reach. CNN, MSNBC, Dems, et al. will denounce this as “Debunked Conspiracy Theories from a Trump Propaganda Network”… which, ironically, only legitimizes the reporting. Because They will go after OAN and its owner and its staff by name, not try to dispute the information itself.

      Two things from The Bright Side:
      1.) OAN has The President’s ears and eyes
      2.) Given #1, and in the context of the very public legal onslaught against The President, it would be a real shame if all of this Giuliani/OAN stuff were to get even more exposure via Senate trial — Giuliani will see to it

      If #2 happens, it will have the “Hunter Biden Effect” on Impeachment and the Dems as a whole. As in: “well, that didn’t exactly go as planned!”.

      At the end of the day: anyone and everyone is free to dispute the documentary and testimonial evidence. We’ll see who steps up to the plate. (he said sarcastically)

      Like

  12. burnett044 says:

    I fell asleep while watching a doc on Et

    Liked by 1 person

  13. Perot Conservative says:

    I support getting the dept of public lands out of DC … but why Grand Junction, Colorado?

    Four hours from a major airport (Salt Lake City)?

    Like

    • ristvan says:

      Two reasons, in my opinion.
      First, there are daily flights on the majors to every major western city.
      Second, is more efficient to use small regional carriers to get closer to the public lands themselves. Examples: fly into Jackson hole wyoming, Billings Montana, or Boise Idaho from Grand Junction.

      Liked by 3 people

  14. Mark W says:

    IG Horowitz referred the ENTIRE chain of command of Obama’s FBI for further investigation… Chaffetz on IG: ‘I do believe people will wind up in handcuffs’
    https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/ig-horowitz-referred-the-entire-chain-of-command-of-obamas-fbi-for-further-investigation-chaffetz-on-ig-i-do-believe-people-will-wind-up-in-handcuffs/

    Like

  15. Reserved55 says:

    Like

  16. Reserved55 says:

    More DOJ coverups

    DOJ Refuses To Release Records On Imran Awan, Citing ‘Technical Difficulties’ And A Secret Case, Court Docs Show

    https://amp.dailycaller.com/2019/12/13/doj-imran-awan-records?__twitter_impression=true

    Like

  17. Perot Conservative says:

    Two of our most trusted sources seem to have divergent opinions.

    Sundance espouses full disclosure of likely over 100 documents.

    Ristvan, a retired (Federal?) attorney, offers that release of said documents could prejudice a jury pool, and the best defense lawyers in the world will use said releases to hammer the court and win early acquittals.

    Are there some ‘safe’ documents to release?

    Liked by 1 person

    • ristvan says:

      PC, impossible to say. Depends on what sort of criminal cases Durham is working up.
      We know there are individual Nunes referrals (Comey on false attestation 18USC1018) and Nunes conspiracy referrals (18USC242 against Carter Page) that cast a broad net. McCabe was referred for perjury before being fired. We know Barr and Durham think the EC predicate was bogus, hence criminal.

      But we don’t know the underlying evidence. My view is that it is better to hammer the perps in courts of law rather than in courts of public opinion, especially given fake news biases.

      No declass on Sundance’ list will derail the House impeachment vote, nor could it ever have, because is based on Ukraine call July 25 and that transcript was released.

      Liked by 5 people

    • MJ says:

      Sundance does not think there will be notable prosecutions. Ristvan offers that, while being a slow process, prosecutions will occur. We all form conclusions from the same pool of evidence. The problem is that all civility is lost once somebody takes it upon themselves to shout that their opinion is right or somebody else’s opinion is wrong, or both.

      Hopefully I haven’t triggered somebody for saying this much.

      Liked by 3 people

  18. Tl Howard says:

    Democrats have become the elected equivalent of Antifa.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Tl Howard says:

    I meant to type “Democrats in Congress….”.

    Like

    • Tl Howard says:

      Perhaps next they’ll take to wearing masks. After all, the so-called “whistleblower” might as well have worn one the way he was shielded by his Antifa Brothers and Sisters.

      Like

  20. Justin Green says:

    Okay, so thinking legally here…

    It seems like Comey, McCabe, Mueller, Stzrok, Page, Clinesmith, Rosenstein, and ALL the rest have not only broken numerous criminal laws, but Mueller’s team defrauded US taxpayers out of tens of millions of dollars.

    Can’t citizens sue Mueller now for defrauding US taxpayers? In the discovery phase, we’d like to see every single communication between Mueller’s entire team related to any portion of their investigation, Donald Trump, or anyone on his campaign. If Mueller knew, and he did early on, that this was a sham, and continued to investigate, he intentionally stole US taxpayer money.

    In fact, ALL of the bad players would be liable.

    Even if for some reason Durham doesn’t come through, US citizens should have a means of attaching some hefty and personally bankrupting costs to their crimes.

    Like

  21. youme says:

    Only the best for Yale:

    Students protest professor’s seminar
    https://yaledailynews.com/blog/2019/11/06/students-protest-professors-seminar/

    Like

    • sunnydaze says:

      Alums that are still donating to these Unis are as messed up as the Profs and Boards who run them.

      The mags these insane asylums send me every month (tho I’ve never signed up) get thrown straight into the trash.

      Liked by 1 person

  22. youme says:

    Like

  23. Dekester says:

    Just watching PDJT at centre field singing with the military.

    Fantastic…does he look concerned…naw.

    God bless PDJT

    Liked by 2 people

  24. RAC says:

    ” Wikileaks Document Shows John Podesta’s Emails Were Hacked in 2016 By the Ukraine, Not Russia – Creepy Podesta Brothers and Hillary Connected to Largest Russian Bank ”

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/wikileaks-document-shows-john-podestas-emails-were-hacked-in-2016-by-the-ukraine-not-russia-creepy-podesta-brothers-and-hillary-connected-to-largest-russian-bank/

    This seems a bit odd, it being reported now. How come it wasn’t spotted way back when they were first published ?

    Liked by 1 person

    • mimbler says:

      I’m guessing that it was reported back when, but it became a lot more relevant since PDJT is being impeached on a Ukraine premise.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mr.piddles says:

      Indeed, the IP is from Ukraine…

      16:04:30 > nslookup 134.249.139.239
      […]
      Non-authoritative answer:
      239.139.249.134.in-addr.arpa name = 134-249-139-239.broadband.kyivstar.net.

      … But that only means the attempt went through a Ukraine server. It could have been sourced from anybody sitting in their underwear anywhere in the world.

      Like

  25. Matthew LeBlanc says:

    Awesome. PDJT wearing a KAG hat to toss coin for 120th Army vs Navy game. Love him.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. K Ma says:

    Very moving, T at the game. N in each locker supporting each team.

    Like

  27. K Ma says:

    Very moving, T at the game. N in each locker supporting each team.

    Like

  28. K Ma says:

    Very moving, T at the game. N in each locker supporting each team.

    Like

  29. Bubby says:

    Anything to this?

    Liked by 1 person

    • MakeAmericaGreat says:

      IMO, there is a trap being set. But it’s not exactly the one McKinnon is laying out in his piece. Still, glad he wrote this because (with impeachment done in the House) it’s time to stop taking the Senate trial for granted.

      The game was afoot as soon as Dems started criticizing Mitch for saying he was going to coordinate with the White House on the trial. Now their astroturf efforts are going to go to shaping the set up of the trial.

      All of us want POTUS fully exonerated in the Ukraine Hoax. However, I am now leaning towards wanting a short trial with no witnesses rather than having people like Hunter Biden called to testify.

      The longer the trial goes on, the more the media can take soundbytes from it to harm POTUS’ standing. And there is a chance that the Dems could call witnesses they were not able to get in the House, people like Mulvaney, Rudy and so forth.

      Even if POTUS is utterly exonerated at the end of the trial, the media will focus on the “new” information given by Mulvaney, Rudy, etc to hurt POTUS. And so a trap had been set and achieved, which is to further weaken POTUS for the election.

      The larger trap now is clear, as set up by Dems and the media — either Mitch does a “fair” (Dem rules) trial, or else POTUS isn’t really exonerated. And doing a “fair” trial leads POTUS into the true trap.

      It is my belief that the Dems will gladly sacrifice BIden to hurt POTUS for 2020. That’s why Bloomberg and Patrick entered the race, as Biden falters. Biden is down to a single-digit lead in South Carolina now, which was going to be his firewall. He’s falling apart.

      If Biden has to get torched in a Senate trial so that POTUS is made weaker for 2020, all good for the Dems. The plan is to dirty POTUS up enough, and then bring in some “pristine, untouched” entity to run as the “anti-corrupt Trump.” Hence Bloomberg and Patrick.

      It sounds like Rudy has a bunch of things he’s waiting to drop on Ukraine, and likely Biden. Get the trial over ASAP and then take it from there, in my opinion. Don’t allow the media or the Dems to alter the parameters of the trial. Mitch should handle it just as the Dems handled the impeachment process in the House. No bending.

      Liked by 1 person

      • MakeAmericaGreat says:

        Just to be clear — I don’t think there is any chance POTUS is getting removed (as McKinnon seems to think may be the “trap” here). I think the real danger is the amount of damage that can be done to POTUS for 2020 in an extended, Dems-call-witnesses trial.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Magabear says:

          Get me McKinnon’s email address, I want to bet him a $100.00 that his theory will be wrong. 😁

          The Senate is the Turtles pond and I don’t think he really cares what the demonrats or the demon media have to say. Does anyone really think McTurtle is going to allow the person who wrote the forward to his book (PDJT) to be removed from office? Ain’t happening.

          Liked by 1 person

  30. lawrencepaul1 says:

    The comparisons are uncanny. Globalism is on the run.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Doppler says:

      Thanks for posting, LP1. Excellent inside baseball look at Boris’s victory. As the 100 year Labour wall across Wales to Scotland was described as falling to Boris, it occurred to me that the US 2020 analogue will be the Africa American, Latino and Native American vote abandoning the woke-Marxist-Globalist-shriekers in droves. Just as Liz Warren forfeited her credibility by shoplifting the Native American affirmative action, cluelessly trying to hang on by proving her 1024th part DNA, while denying she ever benefitted, before finally realizing she really needed to apologize, but was genuinely shocked when African American women were hostile, the repeated screams of “racist, misogynist, White Supremists, etc.,” will backfire bigly among the people who really know those traits and see what President Trump is doing every day for the working class of all stripes.

      Liked by 1 person

  31. NJF says:

    This is a thing of beauty.

    Like

  32. Reserved55 says:

    Like

  33. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    According to the Washington ComPost a New Jersey democrat congressman will be voting against impeachment and switching parties soon. “Officials said Saturday that Rep. Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, a vocally anti-impeachment Democrat, will join the Republican Party in the coming days following a Friday meeting with President Trump — a move that would put a political chill on the Democrats’ expected vote to impeach Trump next week. Two Democratic officials familiar with Van Drew’s discussions in recent days said they believe he has decided to switch parties. The White House meeting was confirmed by a Trump administration official and one of the Democratic officials.”

    As the worm turns . . .

    Like

    • Reserved55 says:

      If one believes in America one cannot be a Democrat. The entirety of the Democrat Party is Communist. They abhor everything America, which is why all you here from their lying Commie mouths is their “Oath to the Constitution”.

      The Communist Party hates President Trump because President Trump is America.

      Liked by 1 person

  34. Justin Green says:

    Oh dear… Hillary has a new look.

    Like

  35. Reserved55 says:

    Like

  36. Stormyeyesc says:

    Twas the Night …

    Twas the night of impeachment, and all through the House
    The members were stirring .. starting to verbally joust.
    The podium was polished, gavel ready to pound,
    In dems’ hopes that their scheming would soon bring Trump down.

    Pelosi in her pantsuit and Nadler in his tent
    Squad in rapt attention at this long-awaited event.
    As the Speaker stepped up and pounded the gavel
    Joy overtook her … her “somber act” did unravel.

    While visions of glory danced in her head,
    Schiff and Nadler beside her, the Articles she read.
    With a face shining bright and a heart filled with glee,
    She began the final vote for this contrived victory.

    Only dems voted “Aye,” most too fearful to stray,
    Republicans stood united and all voted “Nay.”
    The majority carried, but their victory rang hollow …
    A totally partisan vote would be too hard to swallow.

    Then back at the door, there arose such a racket,
    As Melania entered, in her “I Don’t Care” jacket.
    Right behind her was Trump, sporting a bright red tie,
    And they flew down the aisle in the blink of an eye ..

    Bearing gifts for the dems, with beautiful red bows ..
    They were lumps of coal … wrapped in the latest polls!!
    Trump had surged in those polls, with the dems losing big
    ‘Cause Folks saw the injustice … that the outcome was rigged.

    On Pelosi, On Nadler, On Schiff and On Others
    Lay the blame for dems’ failure to accept voters’ druthers.
    Then quick as a wink, the Trumps headed out,
    Their smiles beaming bright among Republicans’ shouts.

    And they heard Trump exclaim as he sped out the door,
    “The People of this country are deserving of more!!
    This is the best gift of all, and this act they’ll remember
    When we win in a landslide, thanks to YOU, next November!!!”

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Kmat says:

    T flips coin at Army Navy game

    Liked by 1 person

  38. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Believe me when I say that you will not regret watching this video.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. Reserved55 says:

    Retired CIA Russian Chief.

    Like

  40. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Is this true?

    Like

  41. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Like

  42. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  43. lawrencepaul1 says:

    Just when you thought that democrats could not possible become any more debased.

    Bernie Rescinds Endorsement Of Dem Candidate After “Legalize Bestiality” Video Resurfaces
    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/bernie-rescinds-endorsement-dem-candidate-after-legalize-bestiality-segment-resurfaces

    Like

    • FofBW says:

      The devil made him do it! 😆

      Liked by 1 person

    • Reserved55 says:

      I read an article earlier that failed to mention Cenk’s perversions. He claimed it was because his constituents weren’t happy with the establishment Ds endorsements.

      Liked by 1 person

    • lolli says:

      with people identifying as animals, not surprised.

      Of course, under sharia, this would need to be acceptable.

      They will start breaking us in, soon. First shock to dull our senses. Then constant advertising and propaganda

      Kinda like the tranny thingy, now 6 yr olds are being transitioned
      murdering babies up to birth
      open borders with illegals receiving our tax dollars,
      torment of political prisoners for the world to see,
      An ongoing coup disguised as an incompetent impeachment with no basis.
      Red flag law. Presumed guilty until proven innocent, based on heresay.

      10 years ago, would you have thought any of this could be acceptable?

      Liked by 2 people

  44. youme says:

    While the masses are distracted by the impeachment spectacle:

    Like

  45. Reserved55 says:

    Brennan and Comey are admitted Communists

    Liked by 1 person

  46. WeThePeople2016 says:

    No sympathy from me.

    Liked by 2 people

  47. linda4298 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  48. Reserved55 says:

    Jill Biden: Trump Is Afraid To Run Against My Husband

    “Well, you know, when Joe and I decided to run for president, when we made that decision, we knew it was going to be tough.”
    So it’s the Hill and Bill strategy.

    https://saraacarter.com/jill-biden-my-son-hunter-did-nothing-wrong/amp/

    Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      Jill Biden, such as she is, would be a better candidate than Joe Biden.

      Like

    • Justin Green says:

      Hilarious. Quid Pro Quo Pedo Joe barely knows what state he’s in when he speaks, talks about kids feeling his hairy legs, is on camera admitting a quid pro quo.

      On the unlikely event that Hell freezeth over and Biden becomes President, he should summarily be impeached on day 1.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s