December 14th – 2019 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1059

In an effort to keep the Daily Open Thread a little more open topic we are going to start a new daily thread for “Presidential Politics”. Please use this thread to post anything relating to the Donald Trump Administration and Presidency.

trump-president-3

This thread will refresh daily and appear above the Open Discussion Thread.

President Trump Twitter @POTUS / Vice President Pence Twitter @VP

Stephanie Grisham Twitter @StephGrisham45

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

736 Responses to December 14th – 2019 Presidential Politics – Trump Administration Day #1059

  1. linda4298 says:

    Liked by 13 people

    • linda4298 says:

      Liked by 6 people

    • lawrencepaul1 says:

      A real chip of the old block.

      Liked by 11 people

      • FofBW says:

        Future President perhaps?

        Sure the possibility scares the hell out of the Liberal Deep State and Globalists.

        Liked by 6 people

        • lawrencepaul1 says:

          Does he qualify though/ His mother wasn’t an American citizen when he was born. Although I cant image anyone more American than him.
          If he does then yes please.

          Liked by 1 person

          • FofBW says:

            Good question!

            Liked by 1 person

            • lawrencepaul1 says:

              Which was never really answered during the Ted Cruz thing.

              Liked by 2 people

              • lolli says:

                Because Cruz sealed his records. He does not qualify, and he knows it.

                Liked by 1 person

              • Lack is not all says:

                It was done for Obama. His father was not an American

                Liked by 7 people

                • lawrencepaul1 says:

                  It was. But it darn well should not have been.

                  Liked by 3 people

                • Debra says:

                  Have YOU seen the definite birth record of Obama?

                  Or, have you RELIED on what you were told and fed via a website? Who among us born in that general time frame, does not have a state issued birth certificate with a raised seal, that we could hold beside our face and declare it to be representative of the true and natural circumstances that existed such that we were natural born to the male AND female listed on said document?

                  IOW, we have no definitive proof that Obama was born to the man AND woman he has put forth as his ‘legal’ parents. Being a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN refers to whom your biological parents are (as nature so made you) NOT your legal parents (as man’s laws so proclaimed).

                  So, if you LACK knowledge of how 44 came into this world, you cannot make the claim you are asserting. My whole assertion relies on this known: Barry is a liar.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • amjean says:

                  Two wrongs do not make a right. We must adhere to the constitution in every way.

                  Like

              • Tom22ndState says:

                Well LP1, I suppose our 44th president whose father was never an American citizen has answered that question.

                Liked by 1 person

                • lawrencepaul1 says:

                  Not really because he should never have been president. If the republicans had had the courage/desire to pursue it he may never have been.
                  Not that I am arguing against Don Jr. I would vote for him in a heartbeat.

                  Like

          • lolli says:

            As much as I would love this idea, if we still have our Constitution, he should not qualify.

            Liked by 3 people

            • lawrencepaul1 says:

              That’s how I understood it also.

              Like

            • Somebody says:

              Not sure when he was born, but I’m pretty sure the law changed in 65 or 73 to state one parent. Prior that that it was both, part of the issue people had with Obama. It might have even been a later change, but I know it changed to one parent vs both at some point.

              Liked by 1 person

                • Mariainohio says:

                  My memory is faulty these days and I really don’t remember, how did Obama pass the smell test with a British citizen dad? I remember the dems having a hissy fit. Is that all it took? If it is, we can have a hissy fit of our own. Obama is now precedent, right?

                  Like

              • lolli says:

                They are intentionally conflating the citizen issue with NBC. NBC has not changed.

                Like

              • 7delta says:

                Legislation or rule changes, alone, cannot amend the Constitution. Art. 2, Sec. 2 natural born citizen means the same thing today that it meant when it was put into the Constitution. Both parents were always the same citizenship (if they differed, wife automatically took husband’s at marriage, children followed the father’s too.) The only time a difference was possible was when a child was born out of wedlock. A rare occurrence back then.

                I think the one-parent thing you’re referring to applies to citizenship, whether born within U.S. jurisdiction or if naturalized after being born abroad to at least one U.S. citizen, who meets the legal qualifications to apply for the child’s citizenship. Neither child is a natural born citizen, but are citizens with all the same rights and privileges as any other citizen. There is no “right” to be president. Just qualifications.

                Melania was naturalized before Barron was born and DJT’s mother was before his birth, but I don’t know if Ivanna was a naturalized citizen at the time of her children’s births or if she is now.

                Like

              • cboldt says:

                The constitution didn’t change, so “law changes” aren’t relevant to the question of presidential qualification.
                Cruz, Cubanadian (Father Cuban, mother US, born in Canada) falls under the Rogers v. Bellei precedent. One citizen parent, child born abroad in naturalized but need not go through any ceremony. The law used to required the citizen to live in the US 5 years before reaching the age of 21 (something like that) in orderto stay a citizen. Bellei didn;t, and was stripped of his citizenship. All 9 SCOTUS judges agreed Bellei was naturalized. The split was whether ot not it was constitutional to strip him of what Congress had given.

                Like

            • cboldt says:

              Yeah, but if he runs, we’ll finally get a decision out of the court system on the defintion of Natural Born Citizen. And if DJT, Jr. isn’t qualified, neither was Obama.

              Like

            • mimbler says:

              I don’t disagree , but that ship has sailed. Obama set a legal precedent that will never be overturned IMO. And that precedent is that a person born to a citizen in the US (as he supposedly was) is a natural born citizen.

              Liked by 1 person

            • Pale rider says:

              There is another way of looking at this ‘obama’ situation. He was a gift that keeps giving. He set us up for Trump maybe Jr. too? I would bet money after four more years the markets won’t want anyone except a Trump.

              Like

          • Amy2 says:

            My understanding is one American citizen parent. Don’t think this would be an issue, although I’m sure some will try to make it one.

            Liked by 1 person

          • booger71 says:

            Barry’s daddy was never a U.S. citizen

            Liked by 2 people

            • lawrencepaul1 says:

              Yeah, but he didn’t ever qualify.

              Liked by 1 person

              • lolli says:

                And that worked out so well./s

                Liked by 1 person

                • lawrencepaul1 says:

                  Well it got us Trump and the Tea Party though.
                  Without Zero we would possibly not have gotten either.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • lolli says:

                  Yes, but you see, it set precedent. We do not want alaweed to run for President, do we? Or one of his kids?
                  The more unqualified citizens, who are not NBC, running, the less our Constitution is adhered to.
                  That is ok with the uniparty, they don’t like having any rules. Just invent rules as they go.

                  Like

            • Debra says:

              Barry’s ‘claimed’ daddy was not a citizen.

              Barry’s NATURAL (biological) daddy is whomever God saw doing the creation act with his biological mother.

              We, the people, have seen NO OFFICIAL DOCUMENTARY evidence of just whom 44’s biological parents were. Period. All we have is the words of KNOWN liars . . .

              Like

              • cboldt says:

                By his own account, Obama was born a dual citizen.
                The constitutional questions are whether a person born a dual citizen is a natural born citizen under the US constitution.
                That question can be approached under different scenarios – dual citizenship can attach by location of birth or citizenship of one parent, or (if born in the US) citizenship of both parents, e.g., are anchor babies and vacation babies qualified for the presidency?

                Like

                • Debra says:

                  By his own account, Barry was trying to fundamentally transform this county! How do you do that? By undermining the Constitution until it is no longer viable, which is exactly the pathway most of the commenters are following when they claim Obama set a precedent!

                  One cannot set a precedent with regard to how they NATURALLY came into existence. We are CREATED EQUALLY, which takes a human male AND a human female meshing DNA. One cannot claim their DNA is ‘something’ BASED ON A PRECEDENT.

                  You, and I, and Obama CANNOT change (fundamentally transform) whom we were born to, but plenty of people sure can lie about such things (ref. the Maury Povitch show) . . .

                  Like

          • rah says:

            LII 8 U.S. Code 1401
            Nationals and Citizens of the United States:
            https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

            Jr. was born to a Father that is a US citizen and was born in the United States and thus is a natural born citizen.
            “(a)a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;”

            Liked by 1 person

            • lawrencepaul1 says:

              I read that during the primaries but there was always a counter argument when we were going back over the Cruz situation. I just can’t recall what it was.

              Like

              • Bendix says:

                Cruz was born in Canada, and had Canadian citizenship. That was the issue that candidate Trump said Ted needed to get straightened out.
                Cruz supporters became angry at Donald Trump for expressing birther theories, but as usual, that was not what he was saying.
                He said Ted had a problem that needed to be straightened out. Ted DID need to get that straightened out.
                If he had become the nominee, it was very likely the Republicans would suddenly decide it was enough to keep him out of the race and put Jeb in.

                Liked by 1 person

                • lawrencepaul1 says:

                  “If he had become the nominee, it was very likely the Republicans would suddenly decide it was enough to keep him out of the race”
                  If not them Clinton certainly would have.

                  If not Clinton certaily would have

                  Like

            • Debra says:

              Reading comprehension is nation-saving.

              The code cited lists people who become citizens AT BIRTH, meaning a LAW gave them citizenship .

              Natural born citizenship is conveyed WITHOUT there being a law proclaiming same. A baby is born in the U.S. to a U.S. citizen mother and a U.S. citizen father is NATURALLY a U.S. citizen, because of the biological fact that it has no other ‘citizenry’ in its DNA.

              Our Constitution states that there WILL be natural born citizens (at some time in the future of the ratification of same) AND there will be citizens, which Congress has authority to uniformly rule what that requires. Your cited code is Congress declaring babies born under the circumstances enunciated to be citizens, NOT natural born citizens.

              Further, by setting different eligibility requirements for President/VP and other federal office holders, to wit, that the former be NBC’s while the latter are required to be citizens, our framers further solidified the LOGIC that one is either a natural born citizen OR a citizen made via a law (aka naturalization, even though in today’s vernacular that term has been hijacked by the ‘process’ a foreign individual goes through to become a citizen — when it actually covers the whole umbrage of ‘being made a citizen’ such as the law you cited conveys).

              Please do not spread misinformation here.

              Like

              • amjean says:

                Both parents must be natural born citizens because our forefathers wanted the
                loyalty to the US to be 100%.

                Like

                • Debra says:

                  Then you could NEVER have achieved ‘natural born citizen’ status in this country! Our founders WERE NOT BORN ‘CITIZENS’ . . . they were British subjects. How could they produce natural born citizens if they were not natural born citizens? Your logic does not hold up . . .

                  Like

              • rah says:

                If your are born in the United States or any of it’s possessions or places of jurisdiction, such as a military post or base in another country, or even a US flagged ship in international waters, and at least one parent is a citizen of the United States at the time, then you are a US citizen at birth, or in other words a Natural Born citizen. There have been 7 Presidents born on US soil who had one parent that was not born in the US. Both of Andrew Jackson’s parents were born outside the US.

                Like

                • Debra says:

                  Citizen at birth IS NOT the equivalent to natural born citizens. Yes, natural born citizens ARE citizens at birth, but NOT because the law you are citing conveys that — and the converse is not true (to wit, not all citizens at birth are NBC’s). IOW, the WHOLE SET of ‘citizens at birth’ are those whom Congress elucidates in that law, AND natural born citizens. The WHOLE SET of ‘citizens’ are those whom are citizens at birth AND those foreigners who come her and go through the legal procedure to become citizens. Once a person IS a citizen, then they (if they procreate with another citizen) CAN PRODUCE — as their offspring — a natural born citizen.

                  It is a logic equation that far too many people simply do not wish to engage their brain to follow . . .

                  Like

                • 7delta says:

                  Andrew Jackson was born in 1767 in Waxhaw, South Carolina, which was a British colony at the time. His parents were Scot-Irish immigrants, who died when he was young. As a boy, he fought in the Revolutionary War. Since he was born prior to Independence and to the ratification of the Constitution, he, with all others of the founding generation, became the first class of American citizens. They were eligible to the presidency, because there were no natural born American citizens, until the first child was born to two citizen parents, within U.S. jurisdiction, after the Constitution was ratified. Born under the Constitution.

                  Also, the alien-born parents of former presidents (save Barry) had all naturalized prior to the future president’s birth. Remember, at that time, an alien woman who married a U.S. citizen man became a U.S. citizen at the time of the marriage, with no further action required on her part. This held true until the Cable Act of 1922, after which, all alien women had to go through the same naturalization process as everyone else.

                  A naturalized U.S. citizen has the same rights and privileges as all other citizens. An alien-born parent, naturalized prior to the child’s birth, is a U.S. citizen parent. Where they were born is irrelevant.

                  Like

              • rah says:

                I’ll be glad when the SCOTUS is forced to rule on this crap so we can get it over with once and for all. But Obama was a president who’s father was not only not a citizen but never became one. Thus for all practical purposes the question has been answered. .

                Like

            • cboldt says:

              Without referring to USCode (because it isn’t the constitution) I think you’ve hit the criteria the founders had in mind with NBC.
              At the time, the citizenship of the wife/mother wasn’t relevant, but the citizenship of the father was. So was the location of the birth. Especially so with Britain, which claimed all people born on its soil (except diplomat’s kids).
              IIRC, the Happerset case is the one where SCOTUS says both parents citizens, born in the US, no question this is a NBC. But I think it is a fair to split that question out into more variations. If I’m counting right, there are eight combinations.
              Four combinations, born in US
              Father citizen, mother citizen
              Father citizen, mother not
              Father not, mother citizen
              Neither citizen (Congress will tell you these are natural born citizens)
              And same four combinations, born out of the country
              Congress will tell you that the ONLY people excluded from POTUS are father not citizen, mother not citizen, not born in the US.
              I believe every Congress has had a bill introduced to amend the constitution to make naturalized citizens eligible too. And I can imagine a “dreamer” extension to that.

              Like

              • Debra says:

                If Congress tells you that and you believe it, then you are an accomplice in contempt of the U.S. Constitution.

                Congress MAKES citizens via man’s law (cited code).

                Nature BEGATS citizens via natural law (biology).

                Your logic is fundamentally faulty, especially when you fail to understand the Constitution, as it was written.

                Like

              • 7delta says:

                The mother’s citizenship was equally important. The child, of an unmarried alien woman, born in the U.S., would not be a U.S. citizen, but since the birth occurred outside her country’s natural jurisdiction, and depending on its naturalization laws, the child would be a citizen/subject of her home country. If she naturalized in the U.S., her minor child would automatically become a U.S. citizen.

                Same with the the child born in the U.S. of 2 aliens parents. If the husband naturalized, the wife and minor children present in the U.S became citizens too.

                The practice of the wife taking the husband’s citizenship was a Natural Law perspective that when a man and woman married, they became as one. Assuring a unified family eliminated the conflict of differing loyalties, claims upon the child by foreign governments and thwarted foreign countries from using dual citizenship to eventually infiltrate their own into powerful positions. Because of the Western patriarchal family structure, which is no better or worse than a matriarchal one…it just was…the husband’s, as “head of the household”, determined the family’s citizenship.

                Early cultural norms may ruffle some modern feathers, but the woman’s citizenship was always as relevant to her political community, as a member, and in its continuation and security as the man’s.

                Like

          • Pew-Anon says:

            To bad he wasn’t born to an illegal alien who crossed the border just in time to give him birth. Then he would be a full-fledged citizen for sure.

            Liked by 1 person

    • LIG says:

      I’ve made about 12 calls and left messages. 6 boxes are full already full . Off to the gym and I’ll make more calls later. Happy We Love our awesome President day❤️ KAG

      Liked by 2 people

    • NJ Transplant says:

      We have one of the 31 in our district, 2-Maine. He has been sending insulting emails about how serious the charges are and how the whistleblower was correct in his complaint. These 31 dems think we are morons.

      I hope he votes for impeachment. If he votes against, it might help him win re-election. For a republican to win in our district, they have to get 50% of the vote with the corrupt ranked voting. Jared Golden, the congressman, actually lost, but the republican didn’t have 50% and Golden was the 2nd choice to voters of independents.

      Like

    • Sprawlie says:

      Those are the numbers to the DC Offices. Here are the numbers to the local district offices:
      AZ-01 – Tom Ohalleran – 520-316-0839 – 928-286-5338
      GA-06 – Lucy McBath – (470) 773-6330
      IL-14 – Lauren Underwood – (630) 549-2190
      IL-17 – Cheri Bustos – (309) 966-1813 – (309) 786-3406
      IA-01 – Abby Finkenauer – (319) 364-2288 – (563) 557-7789
      IA-02 – David Loebsack – (319) 351-0789 – (563) 323-5988
      IA-03 – Cynthia Axne – (712) 890-3117 – (641) 278-1828
      ME-02 – Jared Golden – (207) 249-7400 – (207) 492-6009
      MI-08 – Elissa Slotkin – (517) 993-0510
      MI-11 – Haley Stevens – (734) 853-3040
      MN-02 – Angie Craig – (651) 846-2120
      MN-07 – Collin Peterson – (218) 847-5056 – (320) 235-1061
      NV-03 – Susie Lee – 702-963-9336
      NH-01 – Chris Pappas – (603) 935-6710 – (603) 285-4300
      NJ-02 – Jefferson Van Drew – (609) 625-5008
      NJ-03 – Andy Kim – (732) 504-0490 – (856) 703-2700
      NJ-05 – Josh Gottheimer – (201) 389-1100 – (973) 940-1117
      NJ-11 – Mikie Sherrill – (973) 526-5668
      NM-02 – Xochitl Small – (505) 966-2751 – (575) 323-6384
      NY-11 – Max Rose – (718) 667-3313 – (718) 306-5500
      NY-18 – Sean Maloney – 845-561-1259
      NY-19 – Antonio Delgado – (845) 443-2930 – 845-295-6020
      NY-22 – Anthony Brindisi – (607) 242-0200 – (315) 732-0713
      OK-05 – Kendra Horn – (405) 602-3074
      PA-08 – Matt Cartwright – 570-341-1050 – 570-371-0317
      PA-17 – Conor Lamb – (412) 344-5583 – (724) 206-4860
      SC-01 – Joe Cunningham – (843) 521-2530 – (843) 352-7572
      UT-04 – Ben McAdams – (801) 999-9801
      VA-02 – Elaine Luria – (757) 364-7650 – (757) 364-7631
      VA-07 – Abigail Spanberger – (804) 401-4110
      WI-03 – Ron Kind – (608) 782-2558 – (715) 831-9214

      Liked by 2 people

    • patti says:

      “We’re mad as hell”….

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Mo says:

    Liked by 2 people

  3. linda4298 says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • The left isn’t used to seeing grass roots anger from conservatives and independents.

      The left relies on astroturfing malleable morons into protesting for their grievance du jour and it scares the hell out of them when they see the real thing.

      Some of what I’m beginning to see reminds me of the angry citizens pounding on the doors of the secret rooms where democrat precinct bosses were trying to steal the 2000 election for Al Gore by “recounting” sketchy ballots in private.

      I think there’s a good chance of seeing that again this coming week prior to the full House vote on this impeachment garbage.

      People are pretty wizzed off.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Eric says:

      Spanberger is ex-CIA. I’ve talked about her on CTH before.

      But I would not say her district is overly pro-Trump. The Fredericksburg area is now filled with limousine liberals who drive expensive SUVs with “co-exist” and “Love Trumps Hate” stickers on them.

      You know… morons.

      Liked by 7 people

  4. linda4298 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  5. linda4298 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  6. linda4298 says:

    Liked by 4 people

    • beaujest says:

      Plus they want to take away your car,airplanes,meat,air conditioning with their Green Deal !

      Liked by 2 people

      • Risa says:

        Do people not realize the Green Deal as presented would result in the deaths of an untold amount of people? I despair at how incapable so many people are of understanding the ultimate impact of this totalitarian plan.

        Modern energy has been a miracle for humanity. Affordable food due to fossil-fueled farm machinery, climate- controlled homes, the freedom of travel due to affordable cars..such a long list. How can we allow these to be taken from us?

        But one thing is certain. The Ruling Class will never live under the conditions they would impose on us.

        Like

      • decisiontime16 says:

        All those in favor of the new green deal should lead by example. No more travel except bicycle, walking, etc. for starters. Shopping? All those goods get to the stores using fossil fuel. And then there’s this thing called food. Also delivered with fossil fuel. Maybe they should eat only what they grow or barter for. The whole thing is beyond ludicrous and all of them are as phony or moronic as they come.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Bendix says:

        They already took away our convenient dishwashers.
        It was arbitrarily decided that the old ones used too much water. Enough to get the job done isn’t too much.
        Two hours is too long for a labor saving appliance.
        Dishwashers as they were, already were more efficient than doing dishes by hand.

        When someone has forgotten to run the dishwasher, and dishes are needed in a hurry, what happens then?
        They run the faucet in the sink and wash them. Wasteful of energy.

        No matter who we vote for, we get these edicts imposed on us by people we can’t see, who we never voted for.
        I actually had someone who claimed to be conservative tell me the government “got it right” with the new light bulbs. He couldn’t have purchased the new ones without the government taking away MY preference?

        Like

    • CM-TX says:

      There’s also NO OBSTRUCTION –without– an underlying CRIME for BASIS.
      No Crime = No Obstruction.
      You can NOT obstruct a non-crime, it just can’t be done!

      AG Barr made this abundantly clear in hearing on Mueller Report. He then passed off that report to Public (ie. The House)….

      So then we got Dems w/ their latest impeachment efforts: 🎩 /✨”A la Ukraine BS.”

      Liked by 2 people

      • cboldt says:

        Technically, it is not true that an underlying croime is required to obstruct justice, especially not when the obstruction is at the investigation stage.
        There aren’t many cases on that point, but the principle is a sound one. We expect people to either be truthful or mum when dealing with investigators. There is no allegation that Trump ws not truthful or that he caused an investigator to go down the wrong path, so allegations of “obstruction” are nonsense in his case.
        But in the universe of cases (plus this principle is in the USAM), it is possible to create and perpetuate a wild goose chase.
        I think it is valid to accuse Rosenstein of obstruction of justice for appointing Mueller to investigate what Rosenstein KNEW was no crime. There is no criminal statute on point, but the principle holds.

        Like

  7. Bigly says:

    Liked by 3 people

  8. The Boss says:

    Turning to the Trump economy for a moment…
    How many Treepers have experienced breakdowns in the Christmas / Hanukkah package tracking systems of USPS or UPS? We haven’t shipped Amazon or Fedex yet so I can’t speak to their systems’ performance. I’m asking because we’ve had numerous issues getting accurate tracking information this year like never before, especially USPS and UPS. And there is scant information out there about problems.
    Have you noticed the fleets of rented vans and box trucks that UPS and Amazon are using? Have you seen the USPS trucks operating EVERY day?The volume of packages being delivered in our neighborhood has been very heavy since before Thanksgiving. We see trucks at 9 PM and later now, and they’re out before dawn.
    It seems that package shipping volumes are so high they’re exceeding the peak load capabilities of tracking systems. Bad for customer service, but a sign of a red hot economy, IMHO.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Reserved55 says:

      What you are witnessing is Trump’s economy.

      UPS and other delivery companies rent vehicles every Christmas season.

      https://www.ups.com/us/en/Home.page

      Liked by 1 person

    • Battleship Wisconsin says:

      I’m on a road trip this weekend seeing friends and family in another city. There is half again more commercial traffic of all types on the highways and byways in our part of the state than there was five years ago.

      And yet the Democrats who run this state — and also the voting constituencies and the political machines which put those Democrats in office — they all refuse to acknowledge it is happening.

      If you take what they are saying as gospel, America’s economy is on the verge of serious recession. It’ll be showing up any day now. Unless of course Donald Trump can be quickly removed from office.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Pale rider says:

      You sure they are ‘delivering’ in rented vans?? Sarc

      Like

  9. DesertRain says:

    Nate Cain gave a long interview last night. Mr Cain is the IC whistleblower who provided direct evidence on the Clinton Foundation. Here’s a link to listen to his interesting story….

    Liked by 1 person

    • lolli says:

      👍littleflower
      Thank you. Lovely photos, and I love the one with her standing behind PT holding his hands in 🙏

      Liked by 2 people

      • I wish someone would make some BS magazine covers with our beautiful first Lady that we could paste on all the magazines in the supermarket checkout line.I loath those editors and liberal jerks for hating on our Melania……
        I think it would be fun to watch reactions.

        Like

  10. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  11. cajost says:

    “America’s Game” is on today at 330 EST.

    GO NAVY! BEAT ARMY!

    Hooray!

    Liked by 3 people

  12. jeans2nd says:

    Adding onto linda’s great comment uptop,
    Jenny Beth Martin is back, and she is back with a vengeance.

    Jenny Beth has reinvigorated the Tea Party, and none too soon.
    Jenny Beth has set up a website for action – trumpdefenseteam.com, which redirects you to https://www.teapartypatriotsaction.org/trumpdefense/

    Just bookmark that page. On it you will find booklets, pamphlets, pdfs, etc, links to every Congressman in the country by state, the very important list of The Dirty Thirty, lists of what actions everyone should begin taking, how to organize your group, phone banking, and so much more.

    Jenny Beth’s site is fully endorsed by several grassroots orgs and think tanks, including the most important (to me, anyway) Eagle Forum.

    Those who’ve not yet volunteered – please do something, anything. The 2016 Trump Campaign was the most fun we’ve had in years. And it is all for a good cause – the future of your kids, grandkids, and those yet to come.

    https://www.teapartypatriotsaction.org/trumpdefense/

    You can hear Jenny Beth in the second half of War Room: Impeachment Episode 71

    Liked by 6 people

    • Thanks, this is a great site!

      Liked by 1 person

    • rvsueandcrew says:

      Yes, this is a great site. I thank you for posting the link.

      The suggestions and instructions to have a local sign-waving event are excellent. There are petitions to sign re Pelosi, Schiff, and the impeachment.

      I am dismayed, however, to learn about this now when the sign-waving week was Dec. 9 – 13. What?

      I don’t do Twitter but I read CTH every day and I didn’t hear about this until today, Dec. 14.
      “Day late and a dollar short” comes to mind, only in this case it’s “Week late . . . . ”

      Okay, I know there’s no time limit on organizing events. I’m not an organizer type but I can show up, hold a sign, and wave a flag if I have the info!

      Liked by 2 people

      • I just heard about that today, also, and I am a great sign-waver. I organized myself in 2016 because the GOP Party here was uninterested in my volunteer services. I stood out on the main street in my small town with Trump signs and I got a lot of waves and honks. This is a Dem town and the town gives the Dems complete control of the public property so I stood on the curb right in front of them..haha.

        I guess I can do that myself again. I hadn’t thought about it…so sign should say Stop the Witch hunt? Any other ideas? I still have some Trump/Pence campaign signs and Women for Trump sign from 2016. I’m a political activist so that is what has been driving me crazy…not being able to do anything.

        Liked by 3 people

    • warrprin1 says:

      Done.

      Like

  13. Now, it seems the Dems are going to control the Senate impeachment even though they are the minority by threatening McConnell and they will call it an illegitimate trial if McConnell handles this. Can someone stop this madness before it gets there; like can the Republican Party go to the Supreme Court to declare this an illegitimate impeachment? Dershowitz has already said the SC has pretty much thrown out the second charge:
    https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/12/13/melania-trump-is-an-angel-white-house-christmas/

    Like

  14. Bogeyfree says:

    The thread I’d like to see from Sundance is one titled………

    The Top 20 Why Questions to Ask AG Barr

    This would be a comprehensive list of all the why hasn’t this happened yet questions that need answers from our highest attorney in the land.

    The point of compiling a top 20 list of these in a single thread is education and awareness for the public. When the masses see these they begin to say yea, why hasn’t that been answered yet and why hasn’t that been disclosed or declassified.

    These top 20 when compiled together are very powerful, logical and reasonable questions that Americans deserve to know the answers to.

    It is the public that IMO is the best checks and balance against our government agencies like the FIB and DOJ.

    After all, AG Barr did say he works for the American people so IMO it is time for answers and saying Durham’s investigation will go into the Summer of 2020 with no answers is not good enough.

    Think about this. The man who can see EVERYTHING has chosen not to declass anything for the American people BEFORE PT get impeached by the House AND now it appears nothing will be declassified for the public until the summer of 2020, well after the Senate trial.

    Hmmm…………

    So ask yourself, what if PT is impeached in the Senate come Feb/Mar. With PT now out of office, will anything EVER get declassified for the public or is this really just another JFK “hide the wienie” operation?

    Like

    • Proud American from Texas says:

      I’m frustrated as well.
      But, I find solace in the fact that Nunes and company referred 8 incidents/people for criminal investigation. One of these was as a conspiracy to defraud the USA.
      When he starts grousing about nothing being done, then I’ll get upset.
      I’m going to focus on PDJT’s re-election and regaining the House and keeping the Senate.

      Liked by 1 person

    • butch cassidy says:

      Ain’t nothing gonna happen until Barr says it will happen. Both his interviews the other day, I thought, were great. He told you what has happened, and that it will take time to put it all together, no matter what you want him to do.

      Like

    • The plan is an actual “palace coup.” Both Trump and Pence will be impeached simultaneously on a Bill of Attainder, which will not be challenged, and Nancy Pelosi will be sworn as the first President of the United States who was not elected. Inevitable public protest will be sufficient to declare a “special state of emergency,” necessitating the suspension of the 2020 elections. Donald Trump will simply vanish, and his body will never be found.

      Don’t think I’m joking. I’m not. This is history, folks. Its most bloody pages. About to happen right here, right now, because when the American people had the opportunity to fight back, they didn’t.

      Like

      • dawg says:

        Wait, what? You think thats whats going to happen?

        Like

      • owtolunch says:

        Off the wagon again — huh?

        Like

        • mr.piddles says:

          Outlandish… perhaps. But to play Devil’s Advocate, consider:

          1.) We’ve already had 25th Amendment talk. And you can be sure that wasn’t all just D.C. steak dinner chit-chat.

          2.) Never underestimate the lengths to which The Left and the Democrat Party will go to seize and retain power.

          The Speaker Of The House, Nancy Pelosi, has already asserted that U.S. Citizens can’t be trusted to vote Donald J. Trump out of office. Can’t be trusted. As in: The Constitution is not enough. That’s how those people think.

          Liked by 1 person

      • lawrencepaul1 says:

        There something seriously wrong with you.
        You support that evil liberal witch Ruth Ginsberg.
        You preach that America should have socialized healthcare.
        You chastise us for laughing when antifa gets hit be a traffic cone.
        You get angry because we don’t have amnesty for illegal immigrants and now this fear fearmongering pap.
        This is the “Conservative” tree house. You preach the very same rubbish that Bernie Sansers and Elizabeth Warren are peddling.

        Liked by 1 person

      • cboldt says:

        Ford was not elected.
        Nixon / Agnew. Agnew resigned, Nixon appointed Ford to be VP. Nixon resigned, for became pres.

        Like

      • Amy2 says:

        Mike, did somebody hack your computer?

        Like

      • Garavaglia says:

        My thinking is not much different than yours. Many, many here swore up and down Trump would not even be impeached in the house, which is all but inevetible. Now..we see Senate ‘Repubs” will likely not play by the same rules as the house during a Senate trial. Trump’s voice, I believe, will be thwarted in the trial. McConnel and Graham are voicing opposing views on what the trial would look like, and I don’t have any reason to trust either of them. I truly believe we, the citizens, have to try to stop this or something along the lines of what Mike has expressed will happen. Just my opinion. Don’t think we have the power to stop this? Think again.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Robert Smith says:

      Regardless of what blow back the two parties will suffer, Trump will be gone and they will have done what they set out to do.

      They know it’s all easier from there on. So whatever they say, there is huge risk in going to that step for America and the Constitution. Trump’s rights, our rights, have already been shredded.

      Like

      • butch cassidy says:

        wow, did this little thread about Barr devolve quickly.

        Liked by 1 person

      • 🍺Gunny66 says:

        Robert,

        Maybe I am taking your post the wrong way……

        What rights have already been shredded?
        All we have had is an MSM clown show in the House by a few idiots.

        This is what the enemy….libs and them all have expected from our President….to quit….

        It is not over….we still have our Constitution and our rights….this will come back to them all.

        “Fatigue makes losers of us all”
        Vince Lombardi……

        “Pain is only weakness leaving your body”
        USMC

        Liked by 1 person

        • Robert Smith says:

          I get nervous when I see clowns running the show without limitation. Having my day in court to assert my rights is great but I could be in pretty bad shape by the time I get there and that’s assuming I have the money to get there.

          I should take my cues from Trump and he doesn’t seem worried at all.

          Like

  15. cajost says:

    Had a friend over last night and during the 2016 election she said she was voting for Trump. But more or less because she could not stand the thought of Hillary being our President. Without me bringing the subject up she says, “Remember when I complained about Trump’s tweets? I get it now. He is brilliant! These demos with this absolutely no grounds for impeachment is going to kill them in the 2020 election. Not only is Trump going to win by a landslide, but I think a lot of these dems seats will turn over.”

    We clinked our wine glasses and cheered!

    It is HAPPENING!

    Liked by 11 people

  16. Bogeyfree says:

    I wish someone would tweet Don Jr this………..

    After 9 months has anyone deposed Jullian Assange?

    If the answer is no, I would be very concerned for your Father.

    Like

    • lolli says:

      👍bogey
      IMO, some are waiting for the truth to die, along with Julian. It makes me sick.
      All the crying regarding Kershogi (spelling not correct) dude being killed, yet we watch assange’s slow death sentence, for exposing the truth

      Liked by 1 person

      • CM-TX says:

        😠 There should be A LOT more appreciation for what ASSANGE did…

        PUBLISHING the TRUTH were TOOLS used by many concerned citizens to EXPOSE the Dems SHAM 2016 PRIMARY, & other CRIMINAL ACTIVITY by the Left.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Pale rider says:

          IMO, he pushed Trump over the finish line. I assume he is like some kinda radioactive isotope he is so dangerous? I do not understand that aspect of our president not fighting for him. At some place in our thoughts about all things Trump we need to add these facts, to see clearly. Maybe people here have truthful answers. Either way he should be protected even just to isolate. Our worst prisoners get better treatment than this man.
          Is it a crime when a corrupt government is revealed? Obviously demms don’t think so they protect the whistle blowers.

          Like

          • lolli says:

            Pale rider,
            Always in the back of my mind.
            The ongoing torment of this man in front of the world is so shameful, I have a tendency to see it as intentional, a warning.

            Like

    • booger71 says:

      First…the UK would have to allow it. Who in the UK is in charge of who gets to talk to him.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. Reserved55 says:

    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1205530370239795201.html

    Liked by 3 people

  18. Reserved55 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  19. Koot Katmando says:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-burr-in-nunes-saddle-11576281638?mod=opinion_lead_pos2

    Senate Committee with Burr is a den of vipers. Might behind a pay wall not sure. But Burr stands by statements he made Months ago that ” there were sound reasons for the FISA order”. Burr was lying then and lying now. Burr owes Nunes and PDT a huge apology. The Senate is as much an enemy of the people as the Press. Term Limit the bastards.

    Like

  20. Eric says:

    Ahh, the ugly Communist is seeping out in her…

    Greta Thunberg told a crowd in Italy that “we will make sure we put world leaders against the wall” if they do not do what she tells them to do.

    https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/12/14/greta-thunberg-we-will-put-world-leaders-wall/

    Liked by 3 people

  21. jeans2nd says:

    For those who don’t read American Thinker –

    Appears both CN&N and MSDNC are beginning to tell the truth to their viewers.
    This is 3:42 AND from MSDNC.

    Deplorables, this is earth-shattering for your Socialist friends. Prepare yourselves, your Socialist friends are going into full meltdown. This morning the CN&N chyron told the Socialist democrats what Pres Trump has done to their beloved redeemer-saviors The Courts. And Cardinal Comey is persona-non-grata once again.

    Approach the Socialist democrats with love, but with trepidation. One never knows what a wounded animal might do…

    h/t https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/12/msnbc_joins_cnn_in_starting_to_take_a_critical_look_at_the_impeachment_farce.html

    Liked by 5 people

    • lawrencepaul1 says:

      OMG, I can barely believe what I just saw.
      Somebody is going into full coverourasses mode I suspect, and don’t want to be dragged down into the abyss with the democrat party.

      Like

    • johnnyfandango says:

      Fair analysis…. but MSLSD and their Antifa audience will be screaming for his head and poor Ari gone by next weekend for crossing the liberal red line,

      Like

    • Pew-Anon says:

      “It was a ‘small matter’. But we still want you to know the facts. Three years late.”

      Thanks MSmNBC

      Like

  22. burnett044 says:

    Here is a vid about Nancy Pigloski`s city of San Fran….it is about 20 min long….but if you have time it is worth watching some of it to see how things really are there…

    Like

    • FofBW says:

      I hear from my L.A. suburb friends that it is worse there.

      I live in the Coachella Valley desert, so a bit isolated from all that, thank God!!

      Liked by 3 people

      • Patience says:

        Much of ‘downtown’ LA and surrounding areas was getting run down (dirty) and pretty seedy 17 years ago. Inside the hotels or restaurant seemed fine; till going outside. Night time walking? NO WAY! Also, way too crowded for walking or driving.
        >Such a shame.

        Don’t get me started about San Francisco. 8*( ….heartbreaking.

        Liked by 1 person

      • billrla says:

        FoBW: Parts of LA, including the Westside (plus Santa Monica) and the San Fernando Valley, are disgusting. Every single day, I see it and experience it with my own eyes.

        Liked by 1 person

  23. burnett044 says:

    and in the season of Peace on earth …we have France…

    Liked by 2 people

  24. bessie2003 says:

    Random thought: while listening to one of the talking heads on a news show they were commenting on how the House plans to vote to impeach President Trump on December 19th, the anniversary of the date when former President Bill Clinton was impeached in the House.

    My mind instantly said: another thing that will be known for Trump “stealing” something belonging to a Clinton. Even if it is a notorious thing, the day will now used in future days referencing President Trump and a Clinton will again be relegated to the back burner of historical oddities.

    Again President Trump will be owning the downside.

    Liked by 2 people

    • And the House leadership simply takes for granted that 100% of the Members who wear blue T-shirts will obediently write their names in the most-awful history books by voting “Aye.”

      §1.9.3 is not valid: “A Bill of Attainder can be passed, because we just did!” And, sorry, Mr. Jefferson, “‘maladministration’ is a valid cause for impeachment, because we just said so!” Now that we have established that a “high crime” is anything we wish for it to be, the United States Code notwithstanding, Madame Presidente Pelosi, having become the first in a soon-to-be long line of American Presidents who were not elected by the People but where appointed by The Party, will now proceed to “clean up” the Supreme Court. Long before they get around to making any decision next spring, all Justices who are not agreeable to The Party will have been removed from office by similar bills of attainder.

      And now, having in less than six weeks secured control of the United States Government and eliminated that pesky “separation of powers” thing, we can begin to turn our attention to conquest. World War III will soon be started, and the United States of America, now firmly under our control, will be the aggressor. Germany and Japan were children compared to the amount of military might that the United States can bring to the battlefield.

      Liked by 2 people

      • bessie2003 says:

        Just wanted to say that I’ve appreciated your continuing focus on the meaning of Bill of Attainder as this does seem to be an overlooked aspect in how the process of coup is being played out.

        The one thing that these plotters and their supporters never take into account – things never turned out how they plan. Wars are never quick and easy, coup leaders never end up in control. And stupid never wins!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Do stop thinking about tomorrow says:

        Bybit very nature impeachment is a bill of attainer focusing on one person.

        Like

      • butch cassidy says:

        Mike, I believe that I’m pretty much up to speed on the events that have taken place over the last few years, I have read a lot of sites, read a lot of opinions from well known lawyers who have opined on these subjects and I must say you are the only one that has used the term “bill of attainder”. I wonder why that is? I know there is a “bill of attainder”, but why hasn’t anyone else who follows this brought up your theory? No one. I’d be curious to hear what the lurking lawyer has to say.

        Like

        • Jan Pauliny-Toth says:

          A bill of attainder is prohibited by Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution because it deprivesthe person or persons singled out for punishment of the safeguards of a trial by jury.
          Or not?

          Like

  25. Zippy says:

    Communism is Cancer: A Poem

    Roderick Taylor, also known as Rod Taylor or Roderick Falconer, is an American poet, recording artist, screenwriter, television producer and television director. Taylor holds an MA from Stanford University where he was a Stegner Fellowship winner in poetry and where he later taught creative writing. Taylor is also a Woodrow Wilson fellowship winner and winner of the (American Academy of Poets Prize) for his first collection, Florida East Coast Champion (1972).

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Zippy says:

    Google Archipelago | Michael Rectenwald

    Like

  27. Bigly says:

    Sydney Powell is the smartest and thus the hottest woman in Washington – just so smooth, honest, and talks like lady thatcher – hot!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Zippy says:

      “We found no bias, no TESTIMONIAL (unintelligible mealy mouth word – docum…something) on that.” As Dan Bongino has said, what did he require, an ADMISSION of bias like, “Hey, we were biased”?

      Like

      • cboldt says:

        Exactly right. The statment “we found no testimonial of documentary evidence that any decision was made out of bias” is a misleading way to say nobody admitted wroing, nobody confessed.
        Horowitz is deliberately misleading, as was Mueller with “not exonerated.”
        Swampy people doing swampy things.

        Liked by 1 person

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      Horowitz did his job, that is to White-Wash the FBI, DOJ and FISA Judges. You could learn more from what he did not say, than what he did. Not, a word about the Gang-Of-Eight, not word about the content of the original FISA warrant on Carter Page.

      This point here is that Horowitz is nothing more than a shameful face for the FBI and DOJ.

      Please, no more talk about this corruption being limited to only a few leaders in these organizations.

      Like

    • gda53 says:

      Sydney is looking terrific here for sure.

      And what she’s saying is even more terrific.

      Which comes first – freedom for Gen. Flynn or indictment for Clinesmith?

      Like

    • Amy2 says:

      It’s DURHAM, not Dunham!

      Liked by 1 person

  28. Zippy says:

    Klavan runs intellectual circles around feminism “expert”

    Like

  29. Bogeyfree says:

    For those that don’t follow Rich Higgins, he is a Fmr Director of Strategic Planning at National Security Council that McMasters fired so IMO he knows and speaks the truth.

    Anyway here is a short reply from him on Carter Page for those who are still scratching their head on Page.

    Liked by 2 people

  30. sunnyflower5 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  31. Sherri Young says:

    Liked by 1 person

  32. sunnyflower5 says:

    Masterpiece

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Blue Moon says:

    I would love to see a repub rep in the house go after Nancy’s leadership. She needs to be impeach from the leadership job and someone else needs to replace her.

    Like

  34. keithinmissouri says:

    Ok, so here in another likely travesty in the plethora of travesties we are witnessing. The FBI is truly “famous but incompetent”, a bloated bureaucracy filled with brainwashed staff thinking they are truly the world’s elite crime fighting agency. It needs to get torn down or at least funding and staffing slashed. Instead, they will say they need more funding to “fix their well intentioned mistakes”, and they’ll get it, and become even more powerful and out of control. That’s one more thing MAGA needs to take on.

    Like

    • SHV says:

      “filled with brainwashed staff thinking they are truly the world’s elite crime fighting agency”
      ****
      Has been like that from the beginning…J. Edgar Hoover set the standard for the F.B.I., corrupt, narcissistic, thugs who set themselves above the law. The irony is that all of the “We are the F.B.I.” hubris, we now see it’s a clown show of incompetence.

      Like

    • Do stop thinking about tomorrow says:

      I heard one of the Demorats say affront to the memory of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

      The afront was when the FBI spied on MKL. Then use that against him. SOUND FAMILIER

      Like

  35. islandpalmtrees says:

    It should be clear to even the most casual observer by now, that the FBI is no-longer law enforcement but is instead a massive source of corruption. I could point to their part in the coup on our President or in the willingness to cover-up the crimes of people like Hillary Clinton.

    The point is, until the FBI and DOJ can be shunt down be very, very careful around these people – they are not be trusted. We have reason to believe that they operate without limits!

    Like

  36. TwoLaine says:

    I’m doing some research in the Panama City News Herald, FL today and I ran across 2 things too cute not to share. #1

    Opinion
    LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public not buying ‘World War Zero’ hysteria

    William Meadows of Parker once again takes on what he calls the “hysterical generalities” of climate change.

    The left wants power and that’s a given for that is their reason for existing. The fly in their ointment is finding a way to get it. That is clearly where climate change comes into the equation, even though they aren’t willing to define what it really is.

    Just this week the lovable loser John Kerry launched a new anti-global warming coalition called “World War Zero.” He actually said “World War Zero” was just as important as fighting Adolf Hitler was and the only way to win this war is to give the left total control of our economy, our country and our lives.

    John Kerry, Al Gore and others of that lopsided mindset refuse to have actual debates rooted in science about climate change. They only speak in hysterical generalities. Then claim if they are not in charge the world is going to end in a dozen years or so.

    A survey by The Hartland Institute found that in spite of all the propaganda and efforts fed to the public, more than half did not buy it.

    If John Kerry and his World War Zero against climate change is to be taken seriously, why is the U.S. the only one they want to wage war upon? Beyond any doubt China is the world’s top polluter so why is the left such an apologist for them?

    Democrats and environmentalists often seek to build large, diverse coalitions to push climate policies that end up crumbling under their own weight. Liberals have seized upon outlandishly improbable climate scenarios to urge drastic and immediate action.

    Al Gore has compared global warming to an asteroid colliding with the earth. He went on to claim, “Our food systems, our cities, our people, and our very way of life without immediate and decisive action conditions on Earth could become a memory.” I wonder where he got his crystal ball?

    That’s pretty heavy from a guy whose own movie predicted in 2006 that within 10 years all the ice caps would be melted and Miami and New York would be under water.

    That was just the tip of the iceberg (pun intended) of all the cataclysmic predictions he made that never happened. That alone is a real “Inconvenient Truth.”

    William Meadows, Parker

    https://www.newsherald.com/opinion/20191214/letter-to-editor-public-not-buying-world-war-zero-hysteria

    Like

    • mikeyboo says:

      If Al Gore gets any rounder, he’ll be the asteroid colliding with earth.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Bendix says:

      Modal verbs are often a difficult concept for non-English speakers to grasp.
      What surprises me is the number of Americans who only speak English, who completely miss the fact that all these climate predictions use words like “could”.
      Anything is possible. Monkeys could fly out of Al’s butt.
      BTW, our way of life WOULD become a memory WITH Al’s “decisive action”.

      Here are two things that don’t necessarily go together: suppose Global Warming or whatever was absolute fact. Undeniable. That does not mean writing a big check to “Africa” would fix it.

      I see it all the time, so do you- someone really does have a leaky roof our wet basement or their driveway is in need of repaving, but they still get scammed by fly by night repairmen.

      Liked by 1 person

      • TwoLaine says:

        Excellent points Bendix!

        Personally I think a lot of things could and have flown out of Al’s butt, but I’d really rather not think about it. I’m guessing though that they smell just like his inconvenient truths.

        Like

  37. TwoLaine says:

    #2

    Opinion
    LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The 12 Days of Impeachment

    Jon Prohaska of Shalimar has come up with a Christmas carol for today’s audience.

    (Sung to the tune of “12 Days of Christmas”)

    On the Twelfth day of Christmas the Lefties gave to me:

    12 Never Trumpers, 11 Network Toadies, 10 Lawyers Lying, 9 Shifty Schiffers, 8 Ukraine Mobsters, 7 Comey’s Homies, 6 FISA Forgers, STEELE DOSSIER.

    4 College Profs, 3 Spying Years, 2 Bidens’ Bribes, and Pelosi in a Pear Tree.

    Jon Prohaska, Shalimar

    https://www.newsherald.com/opinion/20191214/letter-to-editor-12-days-of-impeachment

    Liked by 4 people

  38. snellvillebob says:

    Since impeachment is unpopular with over 60% of voters, we need to have people outside polling stations in November with signs saying: “Soando voted to impeach Trump”.
    The very thought of this will drive the Left nuts.

    Like

  39. sunnyflower5 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  40. An says:

    When will we hear more about Flynn? Has another hearing been scheduled yet?

    Like

  41. Do stop thinking about tomorrow says:

    TRUMP IMPEACHED 4 U

    Liked by 1 person

  42. Nice synopsis at to where we’re at according to AG Barr as interpreted by Sheryl Atkinson.
    ____________________

    William Barr Has Suddenly Become Chatty— and He’s Provided Quite an Information Dump

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/william-barr-has-suddenly-become-chatty-and-hes-provided-quite-an-information-dump_3171471.html

    Like

  43. islandpalmtrees says:

    The FBI, DOJ and CIA organizations have shown themselves willing to fabricate evident’s, in order to have a crime, they can charge people with.

    I could point to people like General Flynn, President Trump, Carter Page, etc. as proof.

    And, many of the people responsible for these crimes are still in the FBI, DOJ and CIA organizations.

    These organizations FBI, DOJ and CIA must be shutdown before more people get entrapped by their manufactured charges.

    How many people are in jail from this?

    Liked by 3 people

  44. FPCHmom says:

    Great short video –

    Liked by 1 person

  45. k4jjj says:

    I am sick to death of all this propaganda about the majority of FBI people being “wonderful.” This is a dangerous, anti-American, crime mob who can frame anyone and get away with it. They need to be disarmed, de-funded and disbanded. We can have an independent federal crime lab agency to do forensic testing. The U.S. Marshal Service can carry guns and make arrests. The FBI is too busy covering up its own felonies to protect the USA. We citizens can refuse to cooperate with this bunch of crooks until they are driven out of business.

    The FBI is not SAVING America. It is DESTROYING America.

    Liked by 4 people

  46. FPCHmom says:

    And then there’s this –

    Like

  47. Bogeyfree says:

    Very interesting comment…….

    This from a man who was on the inside at the NSC at the time.

    Like

  48. Jenevive says:

    i know a lot of people don;t trust Barr. But why would he
    come out of retirement, put up up with the abuse of the Dems
    threatening to impeach him and sullying his reputation, why then
    would he sweep all this under the rug especially as he had
    nothing to do with this coup. But suddenly he is just gonna be
    part of it to cover for them.. Are we suppose to believe he came
    out of retirement to be part of the coup???

    I don;t thinks so if he was covering then why did he end
    the Mueller investigation as he did and write that summary?

    I know people say he was a bushie.. but maybe that was a deal
    that POTUS would keep the Kennedy file partly sealed (if indeed we
    beleive George Sr. as CIA director had something to do with it) and in
    exchange the Bushes recommended Barr to clean things up?

    I haven;t heard Barr in any way speak badly of POTUS or scold
    him for anything..

    Liked by 1 person

    • TarsTarkas says:

      He is also seems to be a believer in the rule of law. In that no matter your interests or ideology if the rule of law is discarded in pursuit of either or both, the rule of might will inevitably replace wielded by the ruthless and the unscrupulous. Ginsberg is also a proponent of rule of law, as well as Dershowitz, Turley, McCarthy, and others whose escape me at the moment.

      Weissman, Mueller, and the whole coup team and the impeachment team are who you get when the rule of law is discarded.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Debra says:

      I definitely get the feeling that ‘deals’ have been worked out amongst those who are ‘in the know’.

      Our VSGPDJT wants just government, not weaponized government. The surveillance game has always been one — if used politically — a weapon which is no friend of the just.

      PT inherited the weapon, but does not wield it, although he probably understands that in order to obliterate the weapon, it needs to be spent by ‘someone’ . . .

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s