Sunday Talks: Devin Nunes Discusses Potential Legal Action Against Adam Schiff…

HPSCI Ranking Member Devin Nunes appears on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the ongoing background efforts by Chairman Adam Schiff and his staff to use fraud in an effort to construct an illusion of impropriety against him.

Nunes is on the trail of a network of corrupt DC interests, political operatives and politicians who are fabricating evidence to support a non-existent impeachment narrative. As a consequence Nunes is a target of their efforts.


In the latter part of the interview Nunes discusses the upcoming FISA report from IG Horowitz. A growing concern surrounds the lack of declassification of background documents that have disappeared from the radar. The IG report is one piece of a puzzle, but declassification of hidden documents is more important.

Amid the twists and turns many people have forgotten about the material congress asked President Trump to declassify a year-and-a-half ago. Additionally there has been some material cited that just seemingly slipped away without follow-up. Consider:

  • Whatever happened to the forty pages of Lisa Page and Andrew McCabe text messages that Catherine Herridge noted nine months ago?  Herridge only published four of the pages in March 2019.
  • Why are the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages still redacted two years after their original release (December 1st, 2017)?
  • Where’s the release of the Susan Rice inauguration day memo to the file?
  • Why didn’t the DOJ/FBI release all of the Bruce Ohr 302’s without redaction?  Will those fully unredacted 302’s be part of the IG report release?
  • Where’s the unredacted David Archey FBI declarations that were previously ordered to be released by a DC judge?
  • The Mueller investigation ended 9 months ago.  Why are we still not able to see the  unredacted three authorization memos that Rosenstein gave to the special counsel on May 17th, August 2nd and October 20th, 2017?

Those simple questions (and releases) are in addition to the original list that congress provided to President Trump back in the summer of 2018.  A declassification list that DAG Rod Rosenstein asked President Trump not to release until after the Mueller investigation. Again, the Mueller investigation ended nine months ago; President Trump authorized AG Bill Barr to declassify the material six months ago on May 23rd.

This was the original list from congress in the summer of 2018:

  • All versions of the Carter Page FISA applications (DOJ) (FBI) (ODNI).
  • All of the Bruce Ohr 302’s filled out by the FBI. (FBI) (ODNI) [Without redactions]
  • All of Bruce Ohr’s emails (FBI) (DOJ) (CIA) (ODNI). All supportive documents and material provided by Bruce Ohr to the FBI. (FBI) [Without redactions]
  • All relevant documents pertaining to the supportive material within the FISA application. (FBI) (DOJ-NSD ) (DoS) (CIA) (DNI) (NSA) (ODNI);
  • All intelligence documents that were presented to the Gang of Eight in 2016 that pertain to the FISA application used against U.S. person Carter Page; including all intelligence documents that may not have been presented to the FISA Court. (CIA) (FBI) (DOJ) (ODNI) (DoS) (NSA)  Presumably this would include the recently revealed State Dept Kavalac email; and the FBI transcripts from wiretaps of George Papadopoulos (also listed in Carter Page FISA). [AKA ‘Bucket Five’]
  • All unredacted text messages and email content between Lisa Page and Peter Strzok on all devices. (FBI) (DOJ) (DOJ-NSD) (ODNI)
  • The originating CIA “EC” or two-page electronic communication from former CIA Director John Brennan to FBI Director James Comey that started Operation Crossfire Hurricane in July 2016. (CIA) (FBI) (ODNI)

Additionally, since the 2018 list was developed, more information surfaced about the underlying material.  This added to the possibility of documents for declassification:

♦ The August 2nd, 2017, two-page scope memo provided by DAG Rod Rosenstein to special counsel Robert Mueller to expand the fraudulent Trump investigation, and initiate the more purposeful obstruction of justice investigation. Also the October 20th, 2017, third scope memo that expanded the investigation again, and targeted additional people including Michael Flynn’s family. The Scope Memos are keys to unlocking the underlying spy/surveillance cover-up. [SEE HERE and SEE HERE]

♦ The July 31st, 2016, Crossfire Hurricane counterintelligence operation originated from a scheme within the intelligence apparatus.  The CIA operation  created the originating “Electronic Communication” memo. Declassify that two-page “EC” document that Brennan gave to Comey.  [The trail is found within the Weissmann report and the use of Alexander Downer – SEE HERE]

♦ Release and declassify all of the Comey memos that document the investigative steps taken by the FBI as an outcome of the operation coordinated by CIA Director John Brennan in early 2016.  [The trail was memorialized by James Comey – SEE HERE]  Release and declassify the declarations of FBI Agent David Archey that describe the purpose of the Comey memos:

♦ Reveal the November 2015 through April 2016 FISA-702 search query abuse by declassifying the April 2017 court opinion written by FISC Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer. Show the FBI contractors behind the 85% fraudulent search queries. [Crowdstrike? Fusion-GPS? Nellie Ohr? Daniel Richman?]  This was a weaponized surveillance and domestic political spying operation. [The trail was laid down in specific detail by Judge Collyer – SEE HERE]

♦ Did anyone question former DOJ-NSD (National Security Division) head John Carlin, and get his testimony about why he hid the abuse from the FISA court in October 2016; why the DOJ-NSD rushed the Carter Page application to beat NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers to the FISA court; and why did John Carlin quit immediately thereafter?

♦ The Carter Page FISA application (October 2016) was fraudulent, and likely based on deceptions to the FISA Court. Declassify the entire document, and release the transcripts of those who signed the application(s); and/or depose those who have not yet testified. The creation of the Steele Dossier was the cover-up operation. [SEE HERE]  What version of the FISA application will be released (if at all)?

♦ Release all of the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages without redactions. Let sunlight pour in on the actual conversation(s) that were taking place when Crossfire Hurricane (July ’16) and the FISA Application (Oct ’16) were taking place.  The current redactions were made by the people who weaponized the intelligence system for political surveillance and spy operation.  This is likely why Page and Strzok texts were redacted!

♦ Release all of Bruce Ohr 302’s without redactions.  And FBI notes from interviews and debriefing sessions, and other relevant documents associated with the interviews of Bruce Ohr and his internal communications. Including exculpatory evidence that Bruce Ohr may have shared with FBI Agent Joseph Pientka. [And did anyone get a deposition from this Pientka fella?] Bruce Ohr is the courier, carrying information from those outside to those on the inside.

Yes it is good the FISA investigation report is going to be released on December 9th, but if all of the underlying documents are not declassified there is a risk the information therein is subject to interpretation and/or manipulation.

There is a lot of material the public is aware of; and if the DOJ IG doesn’t release the underlying material then what exactly was the purpose of AG Bill Barr asking President Trump for the declassification authority?….. Accountability requires transparency.

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

81 Responses to Sunday Talks: Devin Nunes Discusses Potential Legal Action Against Adam Schiff…

  1. IGiveUp says:

    “There is a lot of material the public is aware of”

    Somehow I doubt that. However nothing wrong with stimulating consumer demand for transparent and good government through articles like this one.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. JohnCasper says:

    Adam Schiff makes a terrible congressman, but he would make an excellent Nazi. He certainly can make one wonder what country this is and what the year is.

    Liked by 21 people

  3. Johnny says:

    75 percent will have been wiped away with a cloth.
    Especially the text messages. The Government in DC has proved they are not scared of the citizens anymore. We are now serfs.

    Liked by 4 people

    • The Boss says:

      They are scared. We still have the 2A.
      The term “equalizer” is still back of mind.

      Liked by 2 people

    • raptors2020 says:

      I lean towards the number 100%: 100% odds that some is gone forever. That’s why no declassification: they’d go from the frying pan to the fire. Nixon made 18 1/2 minutes of audiotape disappear during Watergate, and it probably cost him the Presidency.

      I suspect assassination or violent coup was under discussion post-election; that shocker would negate all this legalese about some fraudulent counter-intelligence investigation. They were not just dirty cops, but criminals plotting serious crimes. Bill Barr and Chris Wray long ago decided to preserve their institutions, at almost any cost.

      The other less-than-shocker is this was a bipartisan plot; Lindsey Graham has just brazenly announced he won’t allow the truth of Ukraine to be revealed in any Senate impeachment trial. What’s a few minutes in front of the shredder compared to that effort?

      Liked by 2 people

  4. Grassleysgirl/Breitbartista says:

    Who asked who? In other words, did AG Barr REALLY want to ‘release the kraken’ in a truly transparent fashion? Or is he more driven by the ‘save the institutions’ motive.
    I pray that our AG has had a genuine redemptive awakening! Don’t betray the trust the President has place in you, Sir. Please give our Republic this one last chance.

    Liked by 12 people

  5. youme says:

    The lawfare group is congratulating itself on their efforts to destroy President Trump…we have all bases covered…we are infallible


  6. All Too Much says:

    “We know what the insurance policy is. Its something very specific.” 8:56

    That was a nice surprise,

    Liked by 7 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      Yes. Key point. FIrst time I’ve heard that it was a very specific thing. NUnes needs to keep stating this fact.

      Liked by 3 people

    • It is truly frightening to think what that something might be.


    • I have been saying on this site I don’t know how many times, that if you just listen to the multiple times that Nunes has said it, the insurance policy is the part of the FISA document we don’t know about yet. Nunes has seen it and he says it will shock you. That it is even worse than the Steele Dossier.

      Liked by 2 people

    • BitterC says:

      It must be maddening for Nunes to know everything he knows & sit quietly by as the left spins their narrative. Doubt if I could do it. But he knows he must follow all rules to a “T” with the outsized target on his back.

      Sucks tho since he could have put an end to Russian hoax before Mueller was appointed if our side owned the media


  7. Judiciary says:

    Speaking of retribution against Schiff, among others, have folks seen what Barr did on Friday? “Bill Barr indicts 8 including Mueller Top Witness for Funneling Millions in Foreign Donations to Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and Top Senate Democrats” No one is covering it, as far as I can tell, except Thegatewaypundit especially not the mainstream mefia.

    Liked by 14 people

  8. Black Conservative Patriot site says Chrissy Wray pulled the AT&T monopoly strings for Shifty to get phone logs….another SES swamp rat in need of long term incarceration

    Liked by 4 people

  9. Bogeyfree says:

    Questions for Barr……

    1) Why has none of the items Sundance posts above been declassified?

    2) Have you or Durham deposed Jullian Assange?

    3) What was on the Mifsud phones?

    4) Is Mifsud a Russian Agent as the Mueller report indicated?

    5) What happened to the Wiener Laptop?

    6) Did you trace the PapaD serial numbers from the 10k he was given?

    7) Did you depose any of the DNC officials and Crowdstrike about the DNC server and emails?

    8) Did you confiscate the Hillary Server from her 3rd party Colorado company? If not why not?

    9) What happened to the 47 hard drives from Dennis Montgomery?

    10) Have you spoken to the U1 whistleblower and if not why not?

    11) Why have you not opened an investigation into possible corruption and money laundering between Ukraine and US government officials especially with the Rudy evidence, the OANN reporting, the Joe Biden’s video and considering we have a treaty to fight corruption with Ukraine?

    IMO Barr should be brought before Grassley’s committee and under oath respond to many, many un-answered questions.

    After tomorrow IMO there is no reason Barr should not come forward and begin to explain why no declassification to date couple with a host of things listed above.

    Liked by 13 people

  10. ChampagneReady says:

    I trust what Victoria Toensing said that her source told her — “that is going to worse for democrats than you can even imagine,”

    Victoria would not be duped by a source.
    Victoria would know if a source was impeccable.
    Victoria would not exublerantly say this if she didn’t know her source to be EXTREMELY credible
    Victoria has never exaggerated anything she has said before to my knowledge
    VICTORIA WORKED WITH BILL BARR and both her and Joe know him.

    I will be shocked if Victoria’s information wasn’t accurate.

    Liked by 8 people

  11. Zorro says:

    Durham’s cases might need some of the material. That would be a good thing.

    Liked by 2 people

    • jbowen82 says:

      I’m sure that’s part of the answer as to why this information hasn’t been released.


      • vikingmom says:

        I have been hearing for months (or even years) that it’s ALL going to be released soon..and boy, they’re all finally going to go down for what they have done! As soon as the time is right, it’s ALL going to get released…soon, really, really soon…it’s ALL going to get released.

        Forgive me if I sound a little cynical or discouraged but I’m getting a little tired of hearing about some secret Grand Jury that’s meeting and boy, the indictments are gonna start pouring out and it’s ALL going to be released…soon!

        Liked by 1 person

    • felipe says:

      Zorro: “Durham’s cases might need some of the material.”
      I think Mike Flynn/Sidney Powell might also…


  12. Grassleysgirl/Breitbartista says:

    Bleach bit stocks surely skyrocketed during Horowitzs tenure.🚽🚿💸💉

    Liked by 1 person

  13. jbowen82 says:

    For what it’s worth, as I’ve posted before, there’s good reason to infer that Carlin’s a cooperating witness. Indeed, while going to a more lucrative position in private practice is certainly a motivator, it looks entirely possible that he got out when he saw what was going on before it ensnared him too deep.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. No_BlahBlah says:

    Our Constitution is, and has been described as the most perfect form of governance conceived;
    I would stipulate it was proven to be so because it took into account and acknowledgds the Fallibility of Man by utilizing the knowledge gained from the Bible, the ancients and the philosophers of the Enlightenment.

    Much of which the Austrian Economists validated in their writings that investigated Human Activity and, to paraphrase/summarize their writings, Why men act as men act. Cui bono. Occam’s Razor.

    The Founders knew that all men are subject to justifying their succumbing to venality, bribery, depravity, sin. And so, the Founders sought to limit the extent to which men would be exposed to situations or events that allowing their inherent weaknesses to be rule their actions.

    The creation of government for the administration of a sovereign nation must have a legitimate, legal basis to be accepted by the citizenry. A basis that is visible to the citizenry and that is an integral part of the Civil Society. In short, a regime that maintains the Rule of Law.

    When those who govern squander their mandate by embracing their base nature, or allow the unelected bureaucracy to suborn the responsiblity of governance, with NO accountability;

    It is naive to pretend that the legitimacy that has been given through electoral processes can transfer to unelected entities who are not held accountable for their actions and who act only in their own personal interests will ‘govern’ by the will of the people.

    There are always criminal elements within any enterprise. Discovering them is NOT a surprise.

    But if those criminal elements are allowed, as they have been for decades, to create a system where there are different standards of Justice depending upon an individuals status or identity rather than for ALL to be held accountable and judged in the same manner, BY THE RULE OF LAW;

    That society is unraveling and the mandate for being governed is fraying to the point of being severed.

    The widespread corruption of our government is breathtaking. It is not limited to a ‘few’ individuals that are gaming the system.

    IF the delays that we have witnessed are the result of the protected classes PROTECTING THEMSELVES FROM JUSTICE and not because the public disclosure of information will WEAKEN lawful prosecutions of the guilty;

    I weep for America. I weep for the world. Without an America that is the shining light to world, BECAUSE THE RULE OF LAW IS SANCROSANCT,

    There can be NO peaceful solution.

    Liked by 4 people

  15. hawkins6 says:

    The dogged efforts of OAN here and Gulliani et al indicate that a quick end to the Senate Impeachment trial might actually be the best option, so I’m posting my comment here)

    I don’t doubt any of sundance’s speculations or criticisms of Sen Graham but I’m wondering if ending the Dem Impeachment farce as quickly as possible in the Senate is actually the best option for President Trump instead of arranging to have another protracted “political” trial or lengthy bureaucratic investigation without indictable teeth. How will the public react to a Republican “show trial” that could have been avoided by an early vote? If, this Impeachment sham is quickly ended, P Trump will have another irritating load off his back.

    But the decision must depend on which alternative will best lead to P Trump’s re-election. Is an internal conflict loaded with allegations of corruption by Graham and other Republicans a wise move 11 months before the election? Graham unwisely revealed his entire no witness strategy to corrupt Schiff and the Dems which is something they would never do. So, the Dems will be even more emboldened to vote Yes for Impeachment for political reasons—whether positive for them or self defeating. If the Impeachment polls are accurate, it will be self defeating in 2020.

    THEN, after the “acquittal” to ease POTUS’s burden, the Senate is still free to open up a justified but “probably nowhere” investigation of Schiff and his band of Dem misfits. Guilliani, OAN etc will also not quit pursuing the truth. More importantly, actual indictments and accountability would have to come from A/G Barr’s DOJ, but if they have no interest in pursuing any of these issues what would be gained by another lengthy unnecessary trial.

    Liked by 1 person

    • hawkins6 says:

      I meant to post this comment after the OAN article but Rep Nunes’s efforts also show that there are other effective ways to pursue justice and get to the truth while easing P Trump’s burden.

      Liked by 3 people

    • bruzedorange says:

      “Graham unwisely revealed his entire no witness strategy to corrupt Schiff and the Dems which is something they would never do.”

      Or was Graham’s announcement made to reassure corrupt RINOs that he has them covered, that he’s still a member in-good-standing of the Big Club.

      Let’s see if Trump tweets on Lindsey’s announcement. Sometimes I think Trump and Graham are in one of those “I know that you know that I know, but do you know that I know you know that…” kind of relationships.

      Liked by 1 person

      • trnathens says:

        What if they convict in the Senate?

        If Dems truly thought it was pointless, and that Senate wouldn’t convict, why push so hard? Labeling him as “impeached” doesn’t hurt him or help them; but, once impeached the Senate CAN convict, regardless of evidence (called jury nullification), and remove him. Republicans are just as implicated as Democrats.

        Then what?

        Can’t happen? Why not? Is it conviction by 2/3 of 100, or 2/3 of those present at vote time? Even those not explicitly corrupted can be pressured. Doesn’t matter if you agree with it, once convicted…then what, I ask again?

        Liked by 1 person

    • mike lawson says:

      “Graham unwisely revealed his entire no witness strategy”

      You assume that was an unforced error on his part. It could have been intentional.

      Liked by 3 people

  16. LDave says:

    I assume all of DC was compromised by the leftists and their unlawful FISA searches.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. JohnCasper says:

    In Iran they have two systems of “justice”, one for the Mullahs and their close allies, and the other for the rest the people. Are we to have the same thing here just substituting Mullahs with the FBI/CIA/DOJ ?

    Liked by 3 people

  18. Regardless if we get the extent of ‘justice’ we are seeking…is anybody else besides me feeling like this is Christmas Eve, and we’re all waiting to open our presents tomorrow? 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  19. loteal2014 says:

    Okay, so in my opinion, Comey couldn’t get Hillary for intent, so they can’t get anyone for intent unless in black or white. Same with McCabe, etc. but they going after Trump for intent in phone call. I think in both cases it’s going to be a nothing, because you can’t get into the mind of anyone. I’ll hold my nose, but more evidence on McCabe insurance policy than anyone. This Horowitz report will be damaging but not much compared to Durham. I hope Durham can bring down the hammer.


  20. Mike in a Truck says:

    The Swamp is terrified. Watch Virginia. Counties and their Sheriff’s are refusing to comply with any anti 2nd Amendment legislation cooked up by the turds in Richmond. This has a bearing in every state. Next will be states via their counties refusing to comply with anything the D.C. Swampers legislate- no confidence. This is how the next Civil War begins.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Johnny says:

      The shooting will start because those idiots in Richmond that work in the DC Swamp will try to take away some guns by force. I pity the idiots thst listen to the Richmond communist and actually try a confiscation. All that boiling anger will be turned into action. If the Government fires one shot at anyone the fight will be on.

      It will go thru Richmond like green wheat thru a goose, and straight into DC. The failure to destroy DC in the first civil war will not be repeated. DC will get razed.

      I do not think this will be any militias. I believe it will be every citizen that owns a weapon is pissed at DC and it will be an all out stampede straight for DC with nothing but pure vengeance from the years of government ignoring the will of the people.

      Flyover country will be heard.

      Liked by 2 people

    • martyb59 says:

      Just like you say, a lot of sheriffs/law enforcement types will refuse to confiscate weapons. My guess is, if the military were to be called in to confiscate weapons, many if not most of the military would refuse this task as well. A liberal told me recently, if a civil war were to break out, all you people on the right, with your guns, would be in a lot of trouble, because the govt has high tech drones and weapons etc… I told him, my guess is 60% of the military would support those on the right and the real war wouldn’t be between the govt and the citizens with guns, the real war would be those on the political right vs the leftists… I then added, who has more fire power???

      Liked by 1 person

  21. Shyster says:

    Mushroom Theory: Keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit!


  22. islandpalmtrees says:

    Am I the only one to think that based on the information pouring out now. We are looking at Treason on a Large scale now. A great many members of Congress are obstructing the operation of our government to include the IC and State Department.

    Liked by 2 people

    • littleanniefannie says:

      Both parties too

      Liked by 1 person

    • livefreeordieguy says:

      Yes, island… And isn’t it ironic that one of the very few politicians in Washington who is NOT corrupt — the president — is the ONLY one being charged with Treason? Word is the Democrats are going to actually twist the Orwellian knot to the extent of including Treason in the Articles of (fake) Impeachment… God help us…

      Liked by 1 person

  23. TMonroe says:

    “Yes it is good the FISA investigation report is going to be released on December 9th, but if all of the underlying documents are not declassified there is a risk the information therein is subject to interpretation and/or manipulation.”

    Exactly. The telephone call was all set to be spun with insinuations as to what was said, until the president released it despite the unprecedented nature of doing so.

    (Of course, they still spun and entered fictions into the congressional record broadcast worldwide — then claimed parody oopsies after damage was done), but we and anyone wanting to investigate the truth were given the ammunition to challenge their spin and do so with PROOF). We need much more of the same, not only for now but for the history books and the next generations who need to fight neo-Bolsheviks.


  24. mtk says:

    Unfortunately the lack of sun light is proving President Obama right, “We are not an EXCEPTIONAL Nation…
    We are just another Nation with major corruption issues.”


  25. Why did Bill Barr request declassification/release authority?


    He wanted to sit on those documents because their release would provide irrefutable proof that the DNC/Obama Administration/Deep State colluded to “Fix” the 2016 election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

    And Barr is just another one of the corrupt SOBs who are trying to cover that up.

    Mr President: Do EVERYONE a favor and FIRE WILLIAM BARR!


  26. IMO, Congressional subpoenas should be granted by a judge, using the same criteria required when police apply for search warrants.


    Liked by 1 person

  27. SCAMpeachment will forever sear into the American Psyche:

    “NEVER Trust a Demo☭rat”

    EVER for ALL TIME.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Time for the Nunes, White House, or Senate to obtain a subpoena in cooperation with the ICIG,
    because we should see the Whistleblower’s phone calls, for both office phone and cell phone.

    Now, we don’t need to see the whistleblower’s name, or phone #, just show us how many times the whilstleblower called Nadler, Pelosi, Schiff’ Vindeman, Washington Post, and Yovanavich…

    This leaves the whistleblower anonymous, but tells us who has been lying about whether they know who the whistleblower is.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. tacocat43 says:

    If you read the Lawfare blog article (linked above), it seems they are every afraid to let the word “Stelee Dossier” come into the proceedings. So, please, Rep Nunes, bring it up, over and over!

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Robert Smith says:

    Isn’t Schiff just playing the role of an Avenatti?

    Both claimed the inside scoop on everything and everyone until it all collapsed, their usefulness was gone and the DeepState forgot their name.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Publius Syrus says:

    This is blowing up on the DNC, Pelosi/Schiff and Deep State and their captive media propagandists.

    Actually glad Grassley is taking back Judicial from Lindsey.
    Dont pi$$ off a farmer…

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s