Day Five Impeachment Hearings – Fiona Hill and David Holmes – 9:00am ET Livestreams…

Today begins day five of the House impeachment hearings.  Testimony today will include Fiona Hill, President Trump’s top adviser on Russia; and David Holmes, a very sketchy State Department fellow whose wife, Stephanie Holmes, also works at the State Dept; holding a previous assignment with former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch.

The foreign service office is one big internecine anti-MAGA network of mutually aligned career interests, and hard-core political operatives.  The fiasco starts at 9:00am EDT

Fox News LivestreamFox Business LivestreamPBS News Livestream

.

.

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, Live Streaming, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,802 Responses to Day Five Impeachment Hearings – Fiona Hill and David Holmes – 9:00am ET Livestreams…

  1. FanGirl says:

    Takeaway: Bolton = Deep State, too

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Justin Green says:

    Dr. Hill knows that the Democrat involvement is a debunked hoax, but then admits to knowing nothing about it, lol.

    You can’t know it’s debunked if you don’t know anything about it.

    Liked by 8 people

  3. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    At least Hill admits that Ukraine attempted to influence our election, being critical of Trump.

    Like

  4. Peppurr says:

    She didn’t miss much?? The gall. Another hostile witness to be ignored.imo

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Ipse Dipxit says:

    Nice piece at American Thinker on how to launder foreign aid by dumping it directly into an embassy’s Econ office. I wonder if that happened in Ukraine, or Libya (though with 40 metric tons of gold and 40 metric tons of silver missing….)

    Liked by 2 people

    • Jeff says:

      40.
      Metric.
      Tons.
      Metric ton, that’s 2,200 lbs, right?
      Two Thousand Two Hundred POUNDS of Gold. Not ounces, POUNDS. Of Gold.
      “Wait, I got 39 more like it over here.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • ale81inn says:

      Yes, perhaps we should all learn more about Khadafy’s gold. It does explain a lot about what happened in Libya. In fact I think it has rather a lot to do with Ambassador Stevens’ death. He is dead because they wanted him dead

      Liked by 1 person

  6. Patience says:

    Oh, so it’s okay for Himes to disparage the US President, but not for Vindman to be considered questionable, Dr. Kill ?

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    She’s written plenty of op-eds herself? Can we find them all?

    Like

  8. Troublemaker10 says:

    Dem atty Hines back to trying to say Ukraine interference in our election is only a hoax/conspiracy theory.

    Like

  9. Paco Loco says:

    This hearing is just another “Sham-wow” commercial for the crazed Democrats.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Patience says:

    Oh goody. Let’s talk about Dr. Kill’s op-eds

    Like

  11. burnett044 says:

    there will be a day when Shiff head has no power to control……then watch his eyes bug out…
    what goes around comes around…

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    Did one of the Dems give Hill something to read during the break???

    Like

  13. Reserved55 says:

    Again.

    Liked by 8 people

  14. burnett044 says:

    Ms. Hill may I suggest de-caf

    Liked by 2 people

  15. DJ says:

    She called Hillary a horse…

    Like

  16. zimbalistjunior says:

    thanks Fiona re politico article by vogel
    what an idiot
    curry favor
    thanks for proving repub’s point

    Liked by 2 people

  17. sunnyflower5 says:

    Fiona is live Op-Eding her counter to other Op- Eds

    Liked by 2 people

  18. beach lover says:

    I would love to see Schiff and Jordan break into a knock down drag out… would be a fitting end to this circus.

    Like

  19. Patience says:

    WOW quite a YUGE portfolio
    >quite the conductor (not to mention spying ability)

    Liked by 1 person

  20. Ken Maritch says:

    Why does every answer sHill gives, turn into a 20 min speech?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Carolina Kat says:

      Because it consumes time and prevents further questions, including follow up questions on erroneous or contradictory remarks. Filibuster.

      Liked by 3 people

    • LULU says:

      She believes that she was a Very Important Person. The smartest person in the Administration (incluing the President). It is clear that she got her toes pinched when Giuliani and others appeared to her to be investigating her private, carefully staked out turf. Nunes has just made the point that the President had concerns she was not aware of, so it was perfectly reasonable for his personal attorney to be involved.

      She is now also a Woman Scorned.

      Take what she says with a grain of salt…

      Liked by 5 people

      • LULU says:

        On the other hand that dolt Holmes has to be grateful that they are spending more time with Hill. He volunteered for this fiasco and has had absolutely nothing to contribute other than his bogus claim and supposedly supporting performance that he overheard a phone call the President and Sondland were having – on a regular phone (no speaker phone) while sitting at an outdoor sidewalk cafe. Suuuuure…

        Liked by 1 person

      • LULU says:

        Correction: Invading her turf. The other was a slip, but probably true as well…

        Like

      • jbowen82 says:

        And she certainly likes to say it a lot.

        Like

    • ale81inn says:

      shes trying to run out the clock

      Like

  21. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    The Senate will never allow these people to rattle on and on during a real trial. Pelosi has a problem. Here are her choices, all are fails:

    1) call this mess off
    2) carry on with one-sided inquiry in the House during the primaries
    3) vote for impeachment, advance the mess to the Senate, and let the Senate have control of a trial during the primaries.

    Like

    • Nick the Deplorable says:

      I do not think she is going to bring this to a vote. If she does then the GOP senate is in control and sets the rules. The senate will bring in all the witnesses that Schitt disallowed including the whistleblower.

      Liked by 1 person

    • John55 says:

      The GOP Senate has already stated they they will have zero control over any Senate trial, beyond sitting there passively and listening to what the Dem impeachment managers have to say. John Roberts will be in charge of running the show, and he’s as big a Trump hater as Schiff is.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Carolina Kat says:

        Then they will lose the Senate in big numbers.

        Like

      • Peppurr says:

        ohhhh no. sigh

        Like

      • thedoc00 says:

        There is a big difference over the “conduct” of the trial and the “rules” used to conduct it. Lindsey Graham is responsible for those rules until he gives up his chairmanship.

        Like

        • Paprika says:

          Are you sure Lindsey is responsible for those rules? I was under the impression that in the last impeachment trial in the Senate that the majority and minority leader made/agreed upon the rules and it was then those rules were put to a simple majority vote.

          In either case, do we trust Lindsey or a Mitchy/Chucky agreement to what the rules should be?

          Like

          • thedoc00 says:

            It is Lindsey’s committee responsible for structuring the hearing and setting the rules. Just as Nadler’s committee is responsible for the Articles Impeachment and Impeachment Resolution. All those, whom you name, are involved but it is Lindsey Graham’s committee that writes them and passes them to the Senate for Vote. Those are current Senate Rules.

            Like

    • Ellis says:

      I am hearing talk being floated today of a censure. Kind of like a political participation trophy.

      It would be a way for Pelosi to save face, allow vulnerable seats to tell constituents they never believed in impeachment, and Pelosi can still tell the fringe left she tried.

      I believe Jackson was censured and he is memorialized on the $20 bill now. President Trump will have a field day with an epic fail like that, but it’s the price the democrats would have to pay for this farce.

      Like

  22. Vegas Guy says:

    Dems are losing this battle big time. These 2 bring nothing new to the table & are actually hurting their own credibility.

    But let not your heart feel sorrow….Chris Wallace on Fox will surely rehab their testimony….LOL

    Like

  23. joeknuckles says:

    Somebody please as Felonia if she is the anonymous op-ed writer.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    Hahaha! Holmes just thrown completely off balance by Ratcliffe. 🙂

    Liked by 5 people

  25. Phflipper says:

    When an ambassador from a foreign nation writes an oped in the NYT, or anywhere, attacking a candidate/nominee for our elections, people pay attention to that. An ambassador comes with gravitas just by title, it was interfering blatantly in our election from this alone, notwithstanding the uninformed voter being manipulated.

    Liked by 5 people

  26. SAM-TruthFreedomLiberty says:

    This incestuous b.s. makes on thing clear to me:
    Shut the gov. down! Fire everyone!

    Liked by 3 people

  27. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    Homes claimed he had a clear recollection of the conversation but can’t recall other important parts of it. lol

    Liked by 5 people

  28. Cam Heck says:

    I hope Elise Stefanik reads the transcript of Schiff on the phone with the Russian comics who fooled him into thinking they had dirt to offer on Trump. I understand he even had a staff member email them follow up.

    Liked by 4 people

  29. Patience says:

    Who was clearing their throat?
    “Sweden” ?????

    WOW, the first pause of the day

    Liked by 1 person

  30. Do stop thinking about tomorrow says:

    Can you say pompous a$$

    Liked by 1 person

  31. dogsmaw says:

    what did President Trump say next:

    response was `what about Sweden`…

    Liked by 2 people

  32. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    Holmes is hanging himself. He doesn’t recall crucial details (because Lawfare didn’t prep him to talk about them?)

    Liked by 5 people

  33. Patience says:

    Perhaps the wind blew in Holmes’ ear?

    Like

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      Worked with the ultimate stereotypical blonde,
      back when. Absolutely no common sense.

      Female coworker ( ex military) despised her.

      She asked one too many dumb questions one day.

      Ex-military:

      “Kathy, I’m going to blow in your ear and give you a refill”.

      Like

  34. Patience says:

    “My assumptions” ?????

    Liked by 3 people

  35. Revelation says:

    The Dems/Hill keep pulling a switcheroo. When PDJT talks about the Russia Hoax, he is not denying any involvement from Russia in the 2016 election, he is denying that he or anyone n the campaign colluded with them.

    Its deliberately partisan for Fiona Hill to play this game.

    Liked by 3 people

  36. pucecatt says:

    Hahaha , this guy Holmes is way out of his league ..

    Liked by 4 people

  37. Troublemaker10 says:

    Yesterday I thought Holmes probably did hear part of the phone conversation between Sondland and Trump.

    Today I think he made it up.

    Like

    • beach lover says:

      I dont know… I can see Sondland holding his phone out to impress Holmes. He’s such a wanna be. But, the real conversation was not heard in it’s entirety. The fact Trump went to Sweden was hilarious.

      Like

  38. Patience says:

    Dr. Kill, How do you “FEEL” about the President Trump “smear campaign” ??????

    Like

  39. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    Feeelllliiinnnnnnnnnnngs. They are attempting to impeach a President but feeeeellllliiinnnnnnggs are so important again.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Reserved55 says:

    Integrity. The hag is neck deep in Ukrainian corruption.

    Liked by 4 people

  41. sunnyflower5 says:

    How many Ambassadors were removed by Obama? Why did Mr. Holmes stand up for them?

    Like

  42. youme says:

    Too funny

    Like

  43. All Hype says:

    Fiona Hill looks happy and well adjusted!

    Like

  44. Lt Col Covfefe999 says:

    Hey lady, Don Trump Jr had an envelope filled with white powder mailed to him and it blew up in his wife’s face when she opened it. So cry me a river that your publicy-available address was tweeted.

    Liked by 6 people

  45. Reserved55 says:

    Nonpartisan official from the communist Brookings Institute.

    Liked by 2 people

  46. litenmaus says:

    Amazing that Yovanovich was smeared and it’s terrible according to the Dems, but a three year smear campaign against President Trump is lauded as the best thing since sliced cheese…..

    Liked by 4 people

  47. Ken Maritch says:

    Ohhhhh…. Hill does not like criticism by the little people on twitter…. wants it stopped.

    Like

  48. sunnyflower5 says:

    … but smearing the President is ok. It’s the new norm.

    Liked by 4 people

  49. Sherri Young says:

    Okee-dokee. Asl the career diplomats for their feelings about Marie Yovonovich having lost her job. They are lining up a narrative about Trump destroying morale among the rank and file diplomats. Therefore, not fit to serve as president.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s